1
|
Johnson SE, Samson M. Cancer stigma: the need for policy and programmatic action. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:45-50. [PMID: 38836525 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a stigmatized disease in many countries that impacts the quality of life and mental health of people affected by cancer. This commentary examines some dimensions of cancer stigma and has been developed based on insights from participants in a Union for International Cancer Control program dedicated to cancer patient organizations in low- and middle-income countries. Aimed at program managers and policy makers, this commentary highlights the importance of developing strategies to reduce cancer stigma in cancer control programs in different contexts, working closely with community-based civil society organizations and those with lived experience of cancer to understand, evaluate, and take action regarding the impact of cancer stigma on health-seeking behavior and patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mélanie Samson
- Capacity Building, Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Studts JL, Deffendall CM, McCubbin SL, Hamann HA, Hoover K, Brymwitt WM, Williamson TJ. Examining evidence of lung cancer stigma among health-care trainees. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:20-29. [PMID: 38836527 PMCID: PMC11151328 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in lung cancer control and care have started to transform the landscape of lung cancer outcomes, but lung cancer stigma and biases have been implicated as a deterrent to realizing the promise of these innovations. Research has documented lung cancer stigma among the general public and lung cancer survivors (self-blame), as well as clinicians across many disciplines. However, studies have not explored lung cancer stigma in health-care trainees. These data seek to address that gap and inform efforts to prevent the emergence or mitigate the presence of lung cancer stigma among future clinicians. METHODS Using clinical vignettes and a 2x2 factorial design, this investigation evaluated the impact of a history of smoking (yes vs no) and cancer diagnosis (lung vs colorectal) on perceptions of the described patient among 2 groups of preclinical health-care trainees (medical = 94 and nursing = 138). A charitable giving paradigm also asked participants to donate provided funds to 1 of 2 cancer advocacy organizations: one serving the lung cancer community and one serving the colorectal cancer community. RESULTS In study 1, results revealed a consistent pattern of statistically significant and medium to large effect size differences regarding stigmatized perceptions (eg, higher stigmatizing behavior, increased pity, greater anger, and less helping) for individuals with a history of smoking but no reliable differences regarding cancer diagnosis. Analysis of data from nursing trainees in study 2 showed a similar pattern of statistically significant and medium to large effects pertaining to stigma behavior and perceptions of individuals who had a history of smoking depicted in the vignettes. The charitable giving paradigm did not identify any reliable difference between the groups in either study. CONCLUSIONS Findings revealed a consistent pattern of health-care trainee perceptions that varied by smoking status but much less evidence that the cancer diagnosis contributed to different perceptions. This suggests that efforts to integrate consideration of stigma and biases in health-care training needs to adopt an approach that seeks to mitigate or eliminate stigmatizing perceptions and behaviors toward individuals with a history of smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie L Studts
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Heidi A Hamann
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Hoover
- Population Health Shared Resource, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Whitney M Brymwitt
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy J Williamson
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tragantzopoulou P, Giannouli V. Echoes of Support: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Caregiver Narratives in Lung Cancer Care. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:828. [PMID: 38667590 PMCID: PMC11049801 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12080828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer stands as one of the prevalent cancers, impacting both men and women globally. Family caregivers, deeply involved in the care of individuals affected by this disease, often endure heightened distress and struggle to navigate the manifold challenges associated with caregiving. Understanding the intricate experiences and challenges of caregivers in the realm of lung cancer care is critical, given its profound impact on their well-being and the quality of patient care. This study aimed to comprehensively examine and synthesize qualitative data concerning caregiver experiences within the context of lung cancer. Six databases were systematically searched for studies with qualitative findings relevant to caregivers and lung cancer. Seventeen studies were included, and findings were reviewed and synthesized. The main challenges identified were: 'Information accessibility', 'Dual roles and family dynamics', 'Coping with emotional challenges and uncertainty', and 'Need for support networks'. These findings underscore the profound challenges faced by caregivers, shedding light on the substantial impact of cancer on their well-being and functionality. Moreover, the study accentuates the pressing need for tailored support systems that can address the emotional toll and information needs of caregivers. This emphasis on supportive interventions is vital to enhance the quality of care and overall well-being for both patients and caregivers within the lung cancer care continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vaitsa Giannouli
- School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hasson RM, Bridges CJ, Curley RJ, Erhunmwunsee L. Access to Lung Cancer Screening. Thorac Surg Clin 2023; 33:353-363. [PMID: 37806738 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Rural and racial/ethnic minority communities experience higher risk and mortality from lung cancer. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography reduces mortality. However, disparities persist in the uptake of lung cancer screening, especially in marginalized communities. Barriers to lung cancer screening are multilevel and include patient, provider, and system-level barriers. This discussion highlights the key barriers faced by rural and racial/ethnic minority communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rian M Hasson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 51 Medical Center Drive Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
| | - Connor J Bridges
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Richard J Curley
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Loretta Erhunmwunsee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Olson RE, Wen EX, Staines Z, Goh F, Marshall HM. Imperatives of health or happiness: Narrative constructions of long-term smoking after undergoing lung screening. Health (London) 2023; 27:1115-1134. [PMID: 35668696 DOI: 10.1177/13634593221099108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco control policies reinforce a health imperative that positions citizens as duty-bound to manage their health by abstaining from or quitting smoking. Limited attention is paid to the repercussions - especially for lung screening - of anti-smoking rhetoric emphasising individual responsibility. Drawing on interviews with 27 long-term smokers involved in an international lung screening trial, this study analysed Australian smokers' narratives of smoking. By attending to stigma and the use of public health rhetoric within personal narratives, we show how narratives underscoring individual responsibility for quitting were layered with conflicting explanations of biological responsibility and normative expectations. Ironically, narratives of individual responsibility potentially undermine smoking cessation. In positioning smokers as responsible for their own healthy choices, such rhetoric also positions smokers as responsible for managing their emotional health, which some did through smoking. Thus, anti-smoking campaigns pit the neoliberal imperative of health against the happiness imperative. These findings have implications for the design and delivery of lung screening campaigns. They also support calls to move beyond health messaging emphasising individual choice, towards acknowledging the moral power of structures and public health campaigns to discipline citizens in unintended ways.
Collapse
|
6
|
Challenges of Help-Seeking in Iranian Family Caregivers of Patients with Cancer: A Qualitative Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm-127060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: The nature of cancer is such that it causes several problems for patients and caregivers. As a vital source of support for patients with cancer, family caregivers must seek assistance and make use of available resources to overcome these issues and offer better care for the patient. Objectives: This study aimed at exploring the challenges of seeking help in Iranian family caregivers of patients with cancer from supportive sources. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from 2019 to 2021 on 15 family caregivers with a wide variety of caring experiences and 13 health professionals (i.e. nurse, physician, social worker, clergyman, and family counselor who were engaged with services for the patient and caregiver) via purposive sampling and semi-structured in-depth interviews in a central cancer care hospital in Isfahan. Graneheim and Lundman's conventional qualitative content analysis approach was used to analyze the data. To assess data trustworthiness, Lincoln and Guba's criteria were used. Data management was performed using MAXQDA (v. 10) software. Results: Four main categories were identified consisted of (1) being strained by social desirability; (2) stigmatizing attitudes toward help-seeking; (3) reactive self-forgetfulness; and (4) resistance to change. Conclusions: The need to develop and implement interventions geared to enhance family caregivers' preferred attitudes and personal skills in order to overcome socio-cultural obstacles to help-seeking behaviors was underlined in this research. Both health care professionals and the community should be prepared to make support services more accessible and usable for family caregivers.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bédard S, Sasewich H, Culling J, Turner SR, Pellizzari J, Johnson S, Bédard ELR. Stigma in Early-Stage Lung Cancer. Ann Behav Med 2022; 56:1272-1283. [PMID: 35738010 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaac021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phenomenon of lung cancer stigma has been firmly established in the literature. However, studies have predominantly focused on patients with advanced disease, whose experiences may differ from patients with earlier stage, surgically resectable lung cancer and an improved prognosis. PURPOSE The objective of the study was to examine the stigma experienced in a Canadian population with early-stage, resectable lung cancer. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer were enrolled at a tertiary thoracic surgery clinic. The 25-item Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (LCSI) was self-administered by patients to quantitatively measure experiences of lung cancer stigma. LCSI results informed the development of a semi-structured focus group and individual interviews. RESULTS Of the 53 participants completing the survey, 38 (72%) met established LCSI score threshold, indicating a clinically meaningful level of stigma. No significant relationship was found between total LCSI scores and any demographic variable. Analysis of qualitative data revealed multiple themes related to experiences of lung cancer stigma. The major themes were classified into four categories: impact of the association between lung cancer and smoking, societal attitudes and assumptions, personal choices in relation to diagnosis, and experiences related to care. CONCLUSIONS A surgical population of patients with predominantly early-stage lung cancer experienced lung cancer stigma at a high incidence and a level similar to previously studied populations with more advanced disease. The qualitative results support the quantitative findings that respondents experienced more internal stigma than either perceived stigma from others or constrained disclosure related to their diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bédard
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Hannah Sasewich
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jessica Culling
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Simon R Turner
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Janelle Pellizzari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Scott Johnson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Eric L R Bédard
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rodrigues A, Chauhan J, Sagkriotis A, Aasaithambi S, Montrone M. Understanding the lived experience of lung cancer: a European social media listening study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:475. [PMID: 35490223 PMCID: PMC9055221 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09505-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Social media platforms are increasingly being used by stakeholders to generate, access, and share health-related information and experiences. Lung cancer is the most common cancer, impacting > 2 million patients globally. This observational study utilized a social listening approach to analyze social media trends and gain insights into stakeholder perceptions of lung cancer. Methods This social media study retrospectively collated data from open access blogs, forums, and social networking sites. Social media posts were collected between June 2019–May 2020 from 14 European countries. Using social media aggregator tools, posts comprising lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer-specific terms were extracted. Manual and automated relevancy algorithms filtered the extracted information to provide the relevant dataset. This contextualized dataset was further mined to generate the final data for analysis. Results Of 1360 conversations analyzed, 42% were generated by patients/caregivers and 14% by healthcare professionals (HCPs). A majority of patients were 51–70 years old (approximately 50%) and 91% (n = 500/550) had late-stage cancer. Treatment (35%) and disease awareness (30%) were among the most discussed topic of the patient journey. Although the overall treatment sentiment was neutral, chemotherapy was the treatment type with the highest associated negative sentiment (28%); fewer negative sentiments were associated with immunotherapy (9%) and targeted therapy (2%), due to perceptions of longer survival outcomes and fewer side effects. In conversations that discussed clinical endpoints, “survivability” and “overall survival” (47 and 30%, respectively; n = 539) were most frequently mentioned by stakeholders. HCPs mostly used technical terms, whereas patients and caregivers used colloquial terms such as “getting rid of cancer”. Emotional wellness was identified to have a huge impact on quality of life in lung cancer. Delay or treatment cancellations due to COVID-19, lack of effective treatments and funding, and lack of empathy by physicians emerged as the key unmet needs among patients/caregivers. Conclusions Social listening proved to be an effective tool to explore stakeholders’ perceptions and their key unmet needs, typically not available in published literature or databases, and provides HCPs with valuable insights into the distress, doubts, and needs of lung cancer patients and caregivers. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09505-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rodrigues
- Medical Oncology, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, EPE, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Jyoti Chauhan
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd (H.A.), Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | - Michele Montrone
- Medical Thoracic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Diaz D, Quisenberry AJ, Fix BV, Sheffer CE, O'Connor RJ. Stigmatizing attitudes about lung cancer among individuals
who smoke cigarettes. Tob Induc Dis 2022; 20:38. [PMID: 35529324 PMCID: PMC9006129 DOI: 10.18332/tid/146907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many individuals with lung cancer report experiencing stigma associated with their diagnosis. The objective of this study was to explore how different factors, including smoking status, lung cancer concern, and thoughts on smoking behaviors, were associated with increased stigmatizing attitudes towards people with lung cancer. METHODS In 2015, a Web-based survey was completed by people who currently smoked. Participants (n=1419) aged 18–65 years were randomly assigned to one of three scenarios in which the character who was diagnosed with lung cancer currently, formerly, or never smoked cigarettes. Two aspects of stigma were assessed: blaming the victim and negative attributions about people with lung cancer. RESULTS For blaming the victim and negative attributions, lung cancer stigma differed by scenario (described smoking status, p<0.0001), when adjusting for race, sex, education level, age, income, nicotine dependence, quit intentions, and quit attempts. Higher levels of lung cancer concern were associated with greater blaming the victim (p=0.001), when adjusting for scenario and other significant correlates. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that stigmatizing attitudes from people who smoke towards people with lung cancer may be reflective of how they feel about their own smoking habits. We suggest that specific messaging guidelines that avoid an over emphasis on an individual’s smoking status, cessation interventions that address stigma, and screening messages tailored to smoking status, may help to lessen the burden of lung cancer stigma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Destiny Diaz
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
| | - Amanda J. Quisenberry
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
| | - Brian V. Fix
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
| | - Christine E. Sheffer
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
| | - Richard J. O'Connor
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patients' Perceptions at Diagnosis: Lung Cancer Discovery and Provider Relationships. Cancer Nurs 2022; 45:397-405. [PMID: 35067577 PMCID: PMC9294071 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, most lung cancer cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, limiting treatment options and impacting survival. This study presents patients' perspectives on the complexity of factors influencing a lung cancer diagnosis. Lung cancer awareness regarding risks, symptoms, smoking behaviors, family history, and environmental factors can lead to preventative and early detection measures. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore lung cancer patient perspectives on lung cancer awareness within the context of an earlier study to understand sleep-wake disturbances in adults with non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS A content analysis was used to analyze the original deidentified longitudinal interview data collected from 26 patients diagnosed with lung cancer. RESULTS Of the original 26 participants, 16 were included in this secondary data analysis. The participants were primarily females (n = 10) and Whites (n = 13), with ages ranging between 49 and 83 years. Half of the sample was diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer and most of the sample was on chemotherapy (n = 10). Two key themes were identified: the lung cancer discovery and the patient-physician relationship. CONCLUSIONS Unspecific initial symptoms, lack of knowledge and screening, as well as fear of the diagnosis delayed seeking medical care. Patient-physician relationships were hindered by smoking-associated stigma, inadequate sharing of information, and lack of coordinated, holistic care. Positive communication strategies are critical between patients and providers to meet patients' specific needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Educational interventions that enhance lung cancer awareness may improve prevention and screening actions, improve timely healthcare intervention, and reduce incidence and mortality.
Collapse
|
11
|
Akin-Odanye EO, Husman AJ. Impact of stigma and stigma-focused interventions on screening and treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1308. [PMID: 34824631 PMCID: PMC8580722 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stigma is known to negatively influence cancer patients’ psychosocial behaviour and treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current data on cancer-related stigma across different populations and identify effective interventions used to address it. Methodology The protocol, search, appraisal, synthesis, analysis and reporting framework was used for conducting this systematic literature review. CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO and Google Scholar databases were searched using the different combination of keywords that include ‘cancer stigma’. Articles publication period was set for 2010–2020. A total of 54 articles (31 quantitative, 19 qualitative, 2 mixed methods and 2 scoping reviews) that met inclusion criteria were reviewed out of the 958 articles initially identified. Quality assessment of included studies revealed the studies had varying levels of methodological quality. Extracted data were organised and narratively analysed. Results Cancer stigma was expressed across different segments of the society including amongst the elites and healthcare providers. Developing countries had higher rates of stigma reported and experience of stigma varied by cancer type. Cancer was consistently associated with imminent death in all studies reviewed. Cancer patients experiencing stigma were more inclined to conceal their diagnosis and to seek medical help later. Whilst cancer stigma majorly resulted in negative psychosocial outcomes in patients, there were also instances of posttraumatic growth emanating from the stigma experienced. Literature on cancer-related stigma interventions was scant. Conclusion Cancer related stigma remains high in both clinical settings and amongst the general public. There is need for more interventions to combat cancer stigma and its effect in both patient and non-patient population. Anti-cancer public enlightenment campaigns should be sensitively designed to not further fuel stigma against patients with certain types of cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth O Akin-Odanye
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University College Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Road, Oritamefa, Ibadan, Oyo State, 200212, Nigeria
| | - Anisah J Husman
- College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huang CH, Peng TC, Cheng YT, Huang YT, Chang BS. Perioperative exercise intervention in patients with lung cancer: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. Tzu Chi Med J 2021; 33:412-418. [PMID: 34760640 PMCID: PMC8532582 DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_273_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: During perioperative, lung cancer (LC) patients are often left to experience debilitating disease-related symptoms, impaired physical activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and social difficulties, despite the progress achieved in terms of treatment efficacy. Nonpharmacological intervention, such as exercise, has been identified as an effective strategy in LC patients before and after lung resection. Therefore, we aimed to assess evidence of the effect of perioperative exercise among patients with LC. Materials and Methods: Seven databases were searched from January 1998 to September 2020. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of exercise on the physical and psychological status of patients with LC during the perioperative period were reviewed. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of all studies included here using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. Results: Seventeen RCTs (1199 participants) published between 2011 and 2019 met for this literature review. The outcome measures that emerged from these studies included subjective outcomes, such as HRQoL, pain score, fatigue, and objective effects, such as cardiorespiratory fitness, pulmonary function, physical activity, and biological markers. Overall, these studies suggest that exercise should be an optimal option for LC; however, its efficacy and effectiveness regarding HRQoL should be investigated further. Conclusion: Perioperative exercise could be included in the rehabilitation program of patients with LC. More extensive, high-quality RCTs evidence is needed on the ideal exercise type, duration, intensity, and timing across the LC perioperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Hou Huang
- Department of Nursing, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Chu Peng
- Department of Nursing, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Tso Cheng
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Ta Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Bee-Song Chang
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rankin NM, McWilliams A, Marshall HM. Lung cancer screening implementation: Complexities and priorities. Respirology 2021; 25 Suppl 2:5-23. [PMID: 33200529 DOI: 10.1111/resp.13963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer death worldwide. The benefits of lung cancer screening to reduce mortality and detect early-stage disease are no longer in any doubt based on the results of two landmark trials using LDCT. Lung cancer screening has been implemented in the US and South Korea and is under consideration by other communities. Successful translation of demonstrated research outcomes into the routine clinical setting requires careful implementation and co-ordinated input from multiple stakeholders. Implementation aspects may be specific to different healthcare settings. Important knowledge gaps remain, which must be addressed in order to optimize screening benefits and minimize screening harms. Lung cancer screening differs from all other cancer screening programmes as lung cancer risk is driven by smoking, a highly stigmatized behaviour. Stigma, along with other factors, can impact smokers' engagement with screening, meaning that smokers are generally 'hard to reach'. This review considers critical points along the patient journey. The first steps include selecting a risk threshold at which to screen, successfully engaging the target population and maximizing screening uptake. We review barriers to smoker engagement in lung and other cancer screening programmes. Recruitment strategies used in trials and real-world (clinical) programmes and associated screening uptake are reviewed. To aid cross-study comparisons, we propose a standardized nomenclature for recording and calculating recruitment outcomes. Once participants have engaged with the screening programme, we discuss programme components that are critical to maximize net benefit. A whole-of-programme approach is required including a standardized and multidisciplinary approach to pulmonary nodule management, incorporating probabilistic nodule risk assessment and longitudinal volumetric analysis, to reduce unnecessary downstream investigations and surgery; the integration of smoking cessation; and identification and intervention for other tobacco related diseases, such as coronary artery calcification and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. National support, integrated with tobacco control programmes, and with appropriate funding, accreditation, data collection, quality assurance and reporting mechanisms will enhance lung cancer screening programme success and reduce the risks associated with opportunistic, ad hoc screening. Finally, implementation research must play a greater role in informing policy change about targeted LDCT screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Rankin
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Annette McWilliams
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.,Thoracic Tumour Collaborative of Western Australia, Western Australia Cancer and Palliative Care Network, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Henry M Marshall
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,The University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yu W, Lu Q, Lu Y, Yang H, Zhang L, Guo R, Hou X. Anticipatory Grief among Chinese Family Caregivers of Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2021; 8:369-376. [PMID: 34159229 PMCID: PMC8186392 DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon-214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to explore the interrelationship between anticipatory grief (AG), caregiver burden, communication, preparation for death, and coping style. Methods A convenience sample of 256 Chinese family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer were recruited from an academic cancer hospital between April 2018 and May 2019. This cross-sectional survey included the AG Scale, caregiver burden (Caregiver Reaction Assessment), communication (Caregivers' Communication with Patients about Illness and Death Scale), preparation for death, and coping style (Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire). Structural equation modeling tested the interrelation between them. Results The final model fitted the data acceptably (χ2 = 25.79, degrees of freedom = 17, P = 0.08, root mean square error of approximation = 0.05, goodness-of-fit index [GFI] = 0.98, adjusted GFI [AGFI] = 0.95, parsimony GFI [PGFI] = 0.46, normed fit index = 0.94, comparative fit index = 0.98). Poor communication contributed to less preparation for death and caregiver burden, which further aggravate AG. Communication was positively associated with AG. In addition, communication and positive coping style interacted to further influence caregiver burden. Conclusions Preliminary results supported the model and showed that poor communication, less preparation for death, and caregiver burden contributed to AG while positive coping alleviated AG. Findings suggest the need for further studies to explore effective intervention for communication, preparation for death, burden, and coping style of caregivers to ultimately alleviate AG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhua Yu
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Lu
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhan Lu
- Department of Nursing, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Yang
- Department of Nursing, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lichuan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Renxiu Guo
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoting Hou
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Antonakoudis A, Barbosa R, Kotidis P, Kontoravdi C. The era of big data: Genome-scale modelling meets machine learning. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2020; 18:3287-3300. [PMID: 33240470 PMCID: PMC7663219 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
With omics data being generated at an unprecedented rate, genome-scale modelling has become pivotal in its organisation and analysis. However, machine learning methods have been gaining ground in cases where knowledge is insufficient to represent the mechanisms underlying such data or as a means for data curation prior to attempting mechanistic modelling. We discuss the latest advances in genome-scale modelling and the development of optimisation algorithms for network and error reduction, intracellular constraining and applications to strain design. We further review applications of supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods to omics datasets from microbial and mammalian cell systems and present efforts to harness the potential of both modelling approaches through hybrid modelling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Cleo Kontoravdi
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Avancini A, Sartori G, Gkountakos A, Casali M, Trestini I, Tregnago D, Bria E, Jones LW, Milella M, Lanza M, Pilotto S. Physical Activity and Exercise in Lung Cancer Care: Will Promises Be Fulfilled? Oncologist 2019; 25:e555-e569. [PMID: 32162811 PMCID: PMC7066706 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer‐related death worldwide. Affected patients frequently experience debilitating disease‐related symptoms, including dyspnea, cough, fatigue, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and pain, despite the progresses achieved in term of treatment efficacy. Physical activity and exercise are nonpharmacological interventions that have been shown to improve fatigue, quality of life, cardiorespiratory fitness, pulmonary function, muscle mass and strength, and psychological status in patients with lung cancer. Moreover, physical fitness levels, especially cardiorespiratory endurance and muscular strength, are demonstrated to be independent predictors of survival. Nevertheless, patients with lung cancer frequently present insufficient levels of physical activity and exercise, and these may contribute to quality of life impairment, reduction in functional capacity with skeletal muscle atrophy or weakness, and worsening of symptoms, particularly dyspnea. The molecular bases underlying the potential impact of exercise on the fitness and treatment outcome of patients with lung cancer are still elusive. Counteracting specific cancer cells’ acquired capabilities (hallmarks of cancer), together with preventing treatment‐induced adverse events, represent main candidate mechanisms. To date, the potential impact of physical activity and exercise in lung cancer remains to be fully appreciated, and no specific exercise guidelines for patients with lung cancer are available. In this article, we perform an in‐depth review of the evidence supporting physical activity and exercise in lung cancer and suggest that integrating this kind of intervention within the framework of a global, multidimensional approach, taking into account also nutritional and psychological aspects, might be the most effective strategy. Implications for Practice Although growing evidence supports the safety and efficacy of exercise in lung cancer, both after surgery and during and after medical treatments, most patients are insufficiently active or sedentary. Engaging in exercise programs is particularly arduous for patients with lung cancer, mainly because of a series of physical and psychosocial disease‐related barriers (including the smoking stigma). A continuous collaboration among oncologists and cancer exercise specialists is urgently needed in order to develop tailored programs based on patients’ needs, preferences, and physical and psychological status. In this regard, benefit of exercise appears to be potentially enhanced when administered as a multidimensional, comprehensive approach to patients’ well‐being. The potential effect of physical activity in lung cancer is not fully understood, and no specific exercise guidelines for lung cancer patients are available. This article reviews the evidence supporting physical activity and exercise in lung cancer and suggests that this type of intervention, along with considerations for the nutritional and psychological aspects of such an intervention, might be the most effective strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Avancini
- Section of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Science, Department of Medicine, University of VeronaItaly
| | - Giulia Sartori
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of VeronaItaly
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly
| | - Anastasios Gkountakos
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University and Hospital Trust of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Miriam Casali
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of VeronaItaly
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly
| | - Ilaria Trestini
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of VeronaItaly
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly
| | - Daniela Tregnago
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of VeronaItaly
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly
| | - Emilio Bria
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)RomeItaly
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - Lee W. Jones
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of VeronaItaly
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly
| | - Massimo Lanza
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of VeronaItaly
| | - Sara Pilotto
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of VeronaItaly
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kedia SK, Collins A, Dillon PJ, Akkus C, Ward KD, Jackson BM. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2019; 29:251-262. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Satish K. Kedia
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Andy Collins
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Patrick J. Dillon
- School of Communication Studies Kent State University at Stark North Canton Ohio
| | - Cem Akkus
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Kenneth D. Ward
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Bianca M. Jackson
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dresler C, Warren GW, Arenberg D, Yang P, Steliga MA, Cummings KM, Stone E, Jassem J. Indeed, Nuance Matters. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14:e16-e17. [PMID: 30579550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Dresler
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Montrose, Colorado.
| | - Graham W Warren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston South Carolina; Department of Cell and Molecular, Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston South Carolina
| | - Douglas Arenberg
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ping Yang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Matthew A Steliga
- Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; Tobacco Cessation Program, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - K Michael Cummings
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Emily Stone
- St.Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jacek Jassem
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Nightingale CL, Steffen LE, Tooze JA, Petty W, Danhauer SC, Badr H, Weaver KE. Lung Cancer Patient and Caregiver Health Vulnerabilities and Interest in Health Promotion Interventions: An Exploratory Study. Glob Adv Health Med 2019; 8:2164956119865160. [PMID: 31360617 PMCID: PMC6637827 DOI: 10.1177/2164956119865160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lung cancer patients and their caregivers are at risk for negative health behaviors and poor psychosocial functioning, but few interventions exist that target this population. To inform intervention development, we explored potential targets and interest and concordance in health promotion interventions among lung cancer patients and their caregivers. Methods Lung cancer patients (n = 18) with a smoking history and their caregivers (n = 15) participated in a cross-sectional, observational survey study (an average of 1 month postdiagnosis) to assess health behaviors, psychosocial functioning, and interest in health promotion interventions. Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests examined factors associated with intervention interest. McNemar’s test examined concordance in interest. Results Many caregivers (40%) reported providing care at least 4 days per week, and over half (53.3%) reported a smoking history. Patients reported high cancer self-blame (mean = 3.1, standard deviation = 0.9, range = 1–4). Patients (55.6%) and caregivers (60%) reported clinically significant depressive symptoms. There was high interest and concordance in interest in cancer education (patients, 77.8%; caregivers, 86.7%) and diet and exercise (patients, 66.7%; caregivers, 80%) interventions. Significantly more caregivers were interested in stress reduction (patients, 53.3%; caregivers, 73.3%; P = .05) and yoga (patients, 16.7%; caregivers, 50%; P = .03) than patients. Caregivers interested in stress reduction interventions had higher levels of distress than those not interested. Discussion Health promotion interventions are needed and of interest to lung cancer patients and caregivers. Shared interests in interventions suggest dyadic interventions may be appropriate, yet interventions should also address distinct patient and caregiver needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandylen L Nightingale
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Laurie E Steffen
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet A Tooze
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - William Petty
- Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Suzanne C Danhauer
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Hoda Badr
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The social dynamics of lung cancer talk on Twitter, Facebook and Macmillan.org.uk. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2:51. [PMID: 31304397 PMCID: PMC6557847 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0124-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
People with lung cancer and others affected by the condition are using social media to share information and support, but little is known about how these behaviours vary between different platforms. To investigate this, we extracted posts from Twitter (using relevant hashtags), the Lung Cancer Support Group on Facebook and the Macmillan.org.uk lung cancer discussion forum for a single month. Interaction Process Analysis revealed that all three platforms were used more for giving than seeking information, opinion or suggestions. However, interaction types (including sentiment) varied between platforms, reflecting their digital architectures, user-base and inclusion of a moderator. For example, a higher percentage of information-seeking and sentiment marked the Macmillan.org.uk, compared with Twitter and the Facebook Group. Further analysis of the messages using a four-dimensional typology of social support revealed that emotional and informational support types were most prevalent on the Macmillan.org.uk forum, closely followed by the Facebook Group. Contrary to expectations, Twitter posts showed the most companionship support, reflecting the use of hashtags as user-generated signals of community belonging and interests. Qualitative analysis revealed an unanticipated sub-category of spiritual support, which featured uniquely in the Lung Cancer Support Group on Facebook. There was little evidence of trolling or stigma, although some users remarked that lung cancer was unfairly resourced compared with other cancers. These findings provide new insights about how people affected by lung cancer use social media and begin to elucidate the value of different platforms as channels for patient engagement and support, or as potential research data sources.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dao D, O'Connor JM, Jatoi A, Ridgeway J, Deering E, Schwecke A, Breitkopf CR, Huston O, Le-Rademacher JG. A qualitative study of healthcare-related experiences of non-smoking women with lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:123-130. [PMID: 30989430 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04759-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lung cancer in non-smoking women is a distinct entity, but few studies have examined these patients' healthcare-related experiences. METHODS Women with lung cancer and with no smoking history underwent a face-to-face semi-structured, audio-recorded interview that was analyzed with a qualitative inductive approach. RESULTS Twenty-three patients were interviewed, and three themes emerged. The first theme centered on a delay in cancer diagnosis. One patient described, "The whole initial diagnostic process just fills me with rage… I didn't actually get my Tarceva® until the last week in April." Second, the diagnosis of lung cancer seemed especially challenging in view of patients' non-smoking history and otherwise good health; these factors seem to have contributed to the diagnostic delay. One patient explained, "Well, I was just so adamant that I didn't like smoking… maybe if I had been a smoker, they [the healthcare providers] would've been more resourceful." Finally, the stigma of a smoking-induced malignancy was clearly articulated, "Yeah. Because it's a stigma, and I had read that, too -- people go, 'Well, it's your own damn fault because you were a smoker.'" CONCLUSIONS: Non-smoking women with lung cancer appear to endure a long trajectory from symptoms to cancer diagnosis to the initiation of cancer therapy. An awareness and acknowledgement of this long trajectory might help healthcare providers render more compassionate cancer care to these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dyda Dao
- Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer M O'Connor
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Aminah Jatoi
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Jennifer Ridgeway
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Erin Deering
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Anna Schwecke
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | - Olivia Huston
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|