MET Amplification and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer with MET amplification: review of epidemiology, associated disease characteristics, testing procedures, burden, and treatments

Introduction

Mesenchymal-epidermal transition factor gene amplification (METamp) is being investigated as a therapeutic target in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed the epidemiology and disease characteristics associated with primary and secondary METamp, as well as the testing procedures used to identify METamp, in advanced NSCLC. Economic and humanistic burdens, and the practice patterns and treatments under investigation for METamp were also examined.

Methods

Embase and Medline (via ProQuest), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (2015-2022) were systematically searched. Conference abstracts were searched via Embase and conference proceedings websites (2020-2022). The review focused on evidence from the United States; global evidence was included for identified evidence gaps.

Results

The median rate of primary METamp in NSCLC across the references was 4.8% (n=4 studies) and of secondary METamp (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]-mutant NSCLC) was 15% (n=10). Next-generation sequencing (NGS; n=12) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; n=11) were most frequently used in real-world studies and FISH testing most frequently used in clinical trials (n=9/10). METamp definitions varied among clinical trials using ISH/FISH testing (MET to chromosome 7 centromere ratio of ≥1.8 to ≥3.0; or gene copy number [GCN] ≥5 to ≥10) and among trials using NGS (tissue testing: GCN ≥6; liquid biopsy: MET copy number ≥2.1 to >5). Limited to no data were identified on the economic and humanistic burdens, and real-world treatment of METamp NSCLC. Promising preliminary results from trials enrolling patients with EGFR-mutated, METamp advanced NSCLC progressing on an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were observed with MET-TKIs (i.e., tepotinib, savolitinib, and capmatinib) in combination with EGFR-TKIs (i.e., gefitinib and osimertinib). For metastatic NSCLC and high-level METamp, monotherapy with capmatinib, crizotinib, and tepotinib are recommended in the 2022 published NSCLC NCCN Guidelines.

Conclusion

Primary METamp occurs in approximately 5% of NSCLC cases, and secondary METamp in approximately 15% of cases previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor. Variability in testing methods (including ISH/FISH and NGS) and definitions were observed. Several treatments are promising in treating METamp NSCLC. Additional studies evaluating the clinical, economic, and humanistic burdens are needed.

Savolitinib versus crizotinib for treating MET positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The c-MET protein, encoded by the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) gene, can regulate cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Studies have shown that it is one of the essential driver genes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, several clinical studies have carried out objective assessments on the efficacy and safety of different types of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, direct cross-sectional comparisons between different agents are still not available.

METHODS

Our study was a single-center retrospective clinical study, which collected the data from MET positive NSCLC patients treated with MET TKIs at the Lung Cancer Center of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. We explored the efficacy and safety of crizotinib versus savolitinib in patients with METex14 skipping and MET amplification, separately.

RESULTS

Patients with METex14 skipping (median PFS = 10.7 months) had a better clinical response to MET TKIs than MET amplification patients (median PFS = 4.1 months). In the METex14 skipping subgroup, savolitinib did not show better survival benefit with significance than crizotinib (p > 0.05). In the MET amplification subgroup, savolitinib (median PFS = 7.1 months) demonstrated a better progression-free survival benefit than crizotinib (median PFS = 1.4 months), p = 0.05. The most common adverse effects of both MET TKIs were peripheral edema (41.2%), gastrointestinal reactions (23.5%), and liver injury (14.7%). The incidence rate of peripheral edema was higher in savolitinib than crizotinib.

CONCLUSION

In METex14 skipping NSCLC patients, the efficacy of savolitinib and crizotinib did not show significant difference. In MET amplification patients, savolitinib showed better efficacy than crizotinib.

Refining patient selection of MET-activated non-small cell lung cancer through biomarker precision

Dysregulated MET signaling plays an important role in lung oncogenesis, tumor growth and invasiveness. It may occur through various mechanisms, such as MET overexpression or gene amplification or mutation, all of which can be detected by specific methods. The utility of MET overexpression as a biomarker remains unclear due to discrepancies in its occurrence and non-standardized cut-off thresholds. MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) was established as a strong predictor of response to selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and clinical trial results in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring METex14 led to the approval of capmatinib and tepotinib by regulatory agencies worldwide. MET amplification is an emerging biomarker, with clinical data indicating an association between MET gene copy number and response to MET-TKIs. Additionally, MET amplification represents an important mechanism of resistance to TKIs in oncogene-driven NSCLC. The identification of molecular alterations for which targeted therapies are available is important, and high-throughput next-generation sequencing techniques can provide information on multiple genes at the same time, helping to provide valuable predictive information for oncogene-driven cancers. This review summarizes the current methods used for the detection of METex14, MET amplification and MET overexpression, and discusses the evidence for the use of MET-TKIs in patients with NSCLC with MET dysregulation. We discuss the practical challenges that impact the use of METex14 in the clinic and the evidence gaps that need to be addressed to validate additional genomic markers for MET-dependent cancers.

Mutational Landscape and Expression of PD-L1 in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Genomic Alterations of the MET gene

Background

Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutations and MET gene amplification occur in 3–5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting MET alterations have shown promising results in these patients.

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe the genomic profile, PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features of MET dysregulated NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

We identified 188 patients with advanced-stage NSCLC with data on MET expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC for PD-L1 expression was performed in 131 patient samples, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed in 109 patient samples.

Results

MET exon 14 skipping alterations were identified in 16 (14.7%) samples, MET amplifications with cut-off ≥4 copy number variations were identified in 11 (10.1%) samples, and an oncogenic MET mutation (MET p.D1228N) was identified in 1 (0.9%) sample. 12/15 tumors (80.0%) harboring MET exon 14 alterations and 7/11 (63.6%) MET-amplified tumors expressed PD-L1 in ≥1% of tumor cells. Tumors harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations expressed PD-L1 more frequently than MET wild-type IHC-positive tumors (p = 0.045). Twenty-five percent of MET exon 14-altered cases and 33% of MET-amplified cases harbored potentially targetable oncogenic co-mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR. The most frequent co-occurring mutations in all MET-altered tumors were TP53, KRAS, BRAF, and CDK4.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that MET exon 14 skipping alterations and MET amplification are not mutually exclusive to other oncogenic co-mutations, and report the association of genomic MET alterations with PD-L1 expression. Since genomic MET alterations are emerging targets requiring upfront treatment, optimal understanding of the co-mutational landscape for this patient population is needed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-022-00918-6.