Obesity-Specific Association of Statin Use and Reduced Risk of Recurrence of Early Stage NSCLC

Visceral Obesity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

While obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) has been paradoxically associated with reduced risk and better outcome for lung cancer, recent studies suggest that the harm of obesity becomes apparent when measured as visceral adiposity. However, the prevalence of visceral obesity and its associations with demographic and tumor features are not established. We therefore conducted an observational study of visceral obesity in 994 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated during 2008-2020 at our institution. Routine computerized tomography (CT) images of the patients, obtained within a year of tumor resection or biopsy, were used to measure cross-sectional abdominal fat areas. Important aspects of the measurement approach such as inter-observer variability and time stability were examined. Visceral obesity was semi-quantified as visceral fat index (VFI), the fraction of fat area that was visceral. VFI was found to be higher in males compared to females, and in former compared to current or never smokers. There was no association of VFI with tumor histology or stage. A gene expression-based measure of tumor immunogenicity was negatively associated with VFI but had no bearing with BMI. Visceral obesity is appraisable in routine CT and can be an important correlate in lung cancer studies.

The anticancer effect of statins in obese esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

In addition to treating hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis, statins have demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antitumor activity in various cancers. We evaluate this effect in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

METHODS

Esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between March 2007 and December 2015 were included. Association between presurgery statin use and relevant variables with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using Cox hazards. Survival analyses were independently performed for body mass index (BMI)-based subgroups.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between statin use and outcomes overall. However, in subgroup analysis, there was significant association between statin use and outcomes in patients with BMI ≥ 30. Multivariable analysis in obese patients demonstrated the association of statins with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, p = 0.025), DSS (HR: 0.39, p = 0.015), and RFS (HR: 0.38, p = 0.022). The only other variable significantly associated with all three outcome measures was stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use is associated with improved OS, DSS, and RFS of obese patients in resected esophageal cancer. BMI could be investigated as a biomarker for adjunctive statin use in future studies.

Exploring the Impact of the Obesity Paradox on Lung Cancer and Other Malignancies

Simple Summary

Studies have shown that obesity is associated with many adverse health effects, including worse cancer outcomes. Many studies paradoxically suggest a survival benefit for obesity in treatment outcomes of cancers such as non-small-cell lung cancer. This relationship is not seen in animal models. We hypothesize that this relationship is secondary to suboptimal quantification of adiposity, enhanced immunotherapy response, and variables such as sex, medications, and smoking status. There are many ways to measure and classify adiposity, but the ability to distinguish abdominal obesity is likely key in predicting accurate prognosis. There are many ways obesity impacts cancer treatment course from diagnosis to survivorship. In this paper, we aim to analyze the factors contributing to the obesity paradox and its effect on lung cancer. This can aid the treatment and prognosis of lung cancer and may support further research into obesity-specific impacts on this malignancy.

Abstract

There is a paradoxical relationship between obesity, as measured by BMI, and many types of cancer, including non-small-cell lung cancer. Obese non-small-cell lung cancer patients have been shown to fare better than their non-obese counterparts. To analyze the multifaceted effects of obesity on oncologic outcomes, we reviewed the literature on the obesity paradox, methods to measure adiposity, the obesity-related derangements in immunology and metabolism, and the oncologic impact of confounding variables such as gender, smoking, and concomitant medications such as statins and metformin. We analyzed how these aspects may contribute to the obesity paradox and cancer outcomes with a focus on lung cancer. We concluded that the use of BMI to measure adiposity is limited and should be replaced by a method that can differentiate abdominal obesity. We also concluded that the concomitant metabolic and immunologic derangements caused by obesity contribute to the obesity paradox. Medications, gender, and smoking are additional variables that impact oncologic outcomes, and further research needs to be performed to solidify the mechanisms.