Enhancing renal masses with zero net growth during active surveillance

Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics

Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Where Do We Stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present an overview of the current evidence-based studies covering diagnostic and management of SRM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 3% of the cancers. Nowadays, partial nephrectomy (PN) represents gold standard treatment. New nephron-sparing approaches such as active surveillance and ablative therapies have been increasingly used as an alternative to surgical intervention. Due to novel comprehension of RCC and widespread use of imaging techniques, diagnosis at early stage in elderly patients has increased. Treatment decision-making should be based on patient and tumour characteristics. With expanding treatment options, the management of SRMs has become a debate and should be adjusted to patient and tumour characteristics. In a shared decision manner, both active surveillance with possible delayed intervention and focal therapy should be discussed with the patient as an alternative to partial nephrectomy.

Overview of clinical management for older patients with renal cell carcinoma

The rapidly increasing pool of older patients being diagnosed with and surviving their cancer is creating many challenges. Regarding localized renal cell carcinoma, surgery is considered as gold standard treatment options even in older men, whereas active surveillance and ablation therapy are alternative options for a proportion of these patients. With regard to advanced disease, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) and immune check point inhibitor are standard treatment modalities, although treatment choice from multiple regimens and prevention of adverse events need to be considered. Better assessment techniques, such as comprehensive geriatric assessment to meet the unique needs of older patients, are a central focus in the delivery of high-quality geriatric oncology care. Through this process, shared decision-making should be adopted in clinical care to achieve optimal goals of care that reflect patient and caregiver hopes, needs and preferences. It is necessary to continue investigating oncological outcomes and complications associated with treatment in this population to ensure appropriate cancer care. In this narrative review, we completed a literature review of the various treatments for renal cell carcinoma in older patients that aimed to identify the current evidence related to the full range of the treatments including active surveillance, surgery, ablation therapy and systemic therapy. Prospectively designed studies and studies regarding geriatric assessment were preferentially added as references. Our goals were to summarize the real-world evidence and provide a decision framework that guides better cancer practices for older patients with renal cell carcinoma.

The impact of tumor size on the survival of patients with small renal masses: A population-based study

Background

Active surveillance (AS) with delayed intervention has gained acceptance as a management strategy for small renal masses (SRMs). However, during AS, there is a risk of tumor growth. Thus, we aim to investigate whether tumor growth in patients with SRMs leads to tumor progress.

Methods

In this study, we enrolled 16,070 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between 2004 and 2017. The 16,070 patients were divided into three groups: 10,526 in the partial nephrectomy (PN) group, 2768 in the local ablation (LA) group, and 2776 in the AS group. Associations of tumor size with all‐cause and cancer‐specific mortality were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression models.

Results

Four tumor size categories were delineated (≤1, >1–2, >2–3, and > 3–4 cm in diameter), and 10‐year all‐cause and cancer‐specific mortality both significantly increased with increasing tumor size in the PN, LA, and AS groups (all p < 0.05). Tumors were substaged based on diameter: T1aA (≤2 cm) and T1aB (>2–4 cm). All‐cause and cancer‐specific mortality were significantly higher in T1aB tumors than T1aA tumors in each group (hazard ratio = 1.395 and 1.538, respectively; all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Tumor growth relates to worse prognosis of T1a RCC, and 2 cm serves as a size threshold that is prognostically relevant for patients with T1a RCC. Because of the lack of accurate predictors of tumor growth rate, AS for patients with SRMs incurs a risk of tumor progression.

Renal Mass Biopsy

Kidney cancer accounts for 2% of cancer related deaths. Historically, a patient with a solid renal mass would undergo surgery without biopsy given the previously low diagnostic yield of biopsy and the fear of tumor seeding. This led to a high rate of resection for benign masses. With the rising incidence of renal masses discovered on imaging, improvements in biopsy technique and advancements in pathologic evaluation of biopsy samples of renal masses, renal mass biopsy now plays an important role in selected patients with renal masses. Coaxial core needle biopsy is the preferred technique with a low rate of complications and a high diagnostic yield. This article will discuss indications, methods, utility, limitations and complications of renal mass biopsy.

Routes to diagnosis and missed opportunities in the detection of renal cancer

AIM

To determine the proportion of renal cancers for which incidental detection was the route to diagnosis, the characteristics of tumours identified in this way, and the frequency with which opportunities to make this diagnosis were missed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with renal cancers treated at Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (April 2011 and July 2018 inclusive) were identified from the Trust's cancer registry database, and a retrospective review of the imaging and electronic case notes was undertaken. Mann-Whitney U-tests for comparison of patient age and tumour size at diagnosis, and chi-squared tests for comparing cell type distribution and grade were performed. Logistic regression was then used to identify the characteristics of patients in whom a renal tumour was missed initially.

RESULTS

Of 327 patients, 194 (63%) presented incidentally, and 133 (37%) symptomatically. Incidentally detected cancers were found in younger patients, (median of 65 years versus 69 p=0.01) and were smaller at presentation (median of 5.5 versus 7.2 cm, p<0.00001). Thirty-six different reporters missed opportunities to diagnose renal cancer in 50 (16%) patients on 78 occasions, 28 lesions (35%) being missed more than once. Thirty were imaged incompletely; four were visible only on a single image and three on a scout view at magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSION

The commonest route to diagnosis of renal cancer is by incidental detection of a mass. In 16% of patients in whom renal cancer is diagnosed, there is at least one prior examination on which the lesion is visible at an earlier date. The clinical impact of these missed diagnostic opportunities remains uncertain.

Computed tomography features predicting aggressiveness of malignant parenchymal renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy

The aim of this study was to identify and standardize computed tomography (CT) features having a potential role in predicting aggressiveness of malignant parenchymal renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy (PN). We performed a non-systematic review of the recent literature to evaluate the potential impact of CT variables proposed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma in predicting aggressiveness of newly diagnosed malignant parenchymal renal tumors. The analyzed variables were clinical tumor size, tumor growth rate, enhancement characteristics, amount of cystic component, polar and capsular location, tumor margins and distance between tumor and renal sinus. Unfavorable behavior was defined as: 1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with stage ≥pT3; 2) nuclear grade 3 or 4; 3) presence of sarcomatoid de-differentiation; or 4) non-clear cell subtypes with unfavorable prognosis (type 2 papillary RCC, collecting duct or renal medullary carcinoma, unclassified RCC). Beyond clinical tumor size, tumor growth rate, enhancement characteristics, amount of cystic component, tumor margins and distance between tumor and renal sinus are highly relevant features predicting an unfavorable behavior. Moreover, several studies supported the role of necrosis as preoperative predictor of tumor aggressiveness. Peritumoral and intratumoral vasculature as well as capsule status are emerging variables that need to be further evaluated. Tumor size, enhancement characteristics, tumor margins and distance to the renal sinus are highly relevant CT features predicting biological aggressiveness of malignant parenchymal renal tumors. Combination of these parameters might be useful to generate tools to predict the unfavorable behavior of renal tumors suitable for PN.

Renal tumor growth rate in patients with previously normal CT scan: Analysis of the initial stage of growth

OBJECTIVE

Most of the studies regarding natural history of renal masses are based on active surveillance series and suggest that the renal masses have a slow growth rate. Nevertheless, only a few studies report the time between a normal computed tomography (CT) scan to the first detection of a tumor. We aimed to analyze the growth rate in newly diagnosed kidney tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed patients with enhancing renal masses that developed after a normal CT scan, which was performed at most 12 months earlier. Variables examined included patient age, gender, tumor size, volume, tumor linear growth rate (LGR). All cases were surgically treated. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare variables. A p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

We found 31 patients with 33 lesions. Male to female ratio was 1.58 (19/12). The average age was 59.2 years (standard deviation [SD]±12.1), and the mean tumor size was 4.27 cm (SD±4.3). Tumor LGR was 0.87 cm/month (range: 0.28-1.66) and presumed to be 10.4 cm at 1 year (range: 3.36-19.9). Tumor LGR for time detection at <6 month or ≥6 months were 1.1 cm/month and 0.68 cm/month (range: 0.27-1.08 and 0.88-1.76, respectively; p=0.0004), respectively. Tumor LGRs for low- and high-grade tumors were 0.89 cm/month and 0.83 cm/month (p=0.65), respectively. Median volume was 36.1 cm³ (range: 2.61-143.7), and for low and high grade the median volumes were 27.9 cm³ and 47.6 cm³, respectively (p=0.54). Malignant pathology was present in 93.9 % (31 of 33) of masses (lesions).

CONCLUSION

We found differences in tumor LGR in tumors detected before and after 6 months. We did not find any correlation between tumor growth rate and Fuhrman grade system, gender, histology, or age. We found the highest LGR published up to date.

Discrimination of papillary renal cell carcinoma from benign proteinaceous cyst based on iodine and water content on rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate whether rapid kV-switching dual energy CT (rsDECT) can discriminate between papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and benign proteinaceous cysts (BPCs) based on iodine and water content.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with histopathologically proven papillary RCC and 38 patients with 41 BPCs were retrospectively included. Patients with BPCs were eligible for inclusion when the cysts were stable in size and appearance for at least 2 years or proved to be a cyst on ultrasound or MRI. All patients underwent delayed phase (70-90 s) rsDECT. Iodine and water content of each lesion was measured on the workstation.

RESULTS

Of papillary RCC patients, 4 (16%) were female and 20 (84%) were male. Mean tumor size was 39±20 mm. Mean iodine and water content was 2.08±0.7 mg/mL and 1021±14 mg/mL, respectively. Of BPC patients, 9 were female and 29 were male. Mean cyst size was 20±7 mm. Mean iodine and water content was 0.82±0.4 mg/mL and 1012±14 mg/mL, respectively. There were significant differences between iodine and water contents of papillary RCCs and BPCs (P < 0.001). The best cutoff of iodine content for differentiating papillary RCC from BPC was 1.21 mg/mL (area under the curve [AUC]=0.97, P < 0.001, sensitivity 96%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value [PPV] 82%, negative predictive value [NPV] 97%, accuracy 91%,); the best cutoff of water content was 1015.5 mg/mL (AUC=0.68, P = 0.016, sensitivity 83%, specificity 56%, PPV 52%, NPV 85%, accuracy 66%).

CONCLUSION

An iodine content threshold of 1.21 mg/mL accurately differentiates papillary RCC from BPCs on a single postcontrast rsDECT. Despite having a high sensitivity, water content has inferior diagnostic accuracy.

Small Renal Mass Surveillance: Histology-specific Growth Rates in a Biopsy-characterized Cohort

BACKGROUND

Most reports of active surveillance (AS) of small renal masses (SRMs) lack biopsy confirmation, and therefore include benign tumors and different subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OBJECTIVE

We compared the growth rates and progression of different histologic subtypes of RCC SRMs (SRM^RCC) in the largest cohort of patients with biopsy-characterized SRMs on AS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data from patients in a multicenter Canadian trial and a Princess Margaret cohort were combined to include 136 biopsy-proven SRM^RCC lesions managed by AS, with treatment deferred until progression or patient/surgeon decision.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Growth curves were estimated from serial tumor size measures. Tumor progression was defined by sustained size ≥4 cm or volume doubling within 1 yr.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median follow-up for patients who remained on AS was 5.8 yr (interquartile range 3.4-7.5 yr). Clear cell RCC SRMs (SRM^ccRCC) grew faster than papillary type 1 SRMs (0.25 and 0.02 cm/yr on average, respectively, p =  0.0003). Overall, 60 SRM^RCC lesions progressed: 49 (82%) by rapid growth (volume doubling), seven (12%) increasing to ≥4 cm, and four (6.7%) by both criteria. Six patients developed metastases, and all were of clear cell RCC histology. Limitations include the use of different imaging modalities and a lack of central imaging review.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor growth varies between histologic subtypes of SRM^RCC and among SRM^ccRCC, which likely reflects individual host and tumor biology. Without validated biomarkers that predict this variation, initial follow-up of histologically characterized SRMs can inform personalized treatment for patients on AS.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Many small kidney cancers are suitable for surveillance and can be monitored over time for change. We demonstrate that different types of kidney cancers grow at different rates and are at different risks of progression. These results may guide better personalized treatment.

The role of percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy in the management of small renal masses without chance of nephron-sparing surgery

PURPOSE

We seek to confirm the safety and efficacy of percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for small renal masses (SRMs) without chance of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, 169 consecutive patients with SRMs treated in two medical centers were enrolled in the study retrospectively. All patients were evaluated to be candidates of radical nephrectomy (RN) at the initial evaluation preoperatively and they would receive the second evaluation in operation to decide the ultimate surgical regimen. Patients were divided into two groups according to FNAB.

RESULTS

169 patients met inclusion criteria were enrolled in the finial study. The median follow-up of was 35 months (ranges from 23 to 49 months) from the first diagnosis. 83 patients received FNAB before surgery, and the other 86 patients underwent surgery immediately. The initial success rate of FNAB was 91.6% (76/83) and the rate of accuracy in identifying malignancies was 100%. 15 (18.1%) of 83 patients developed different levels of complications. 15 (18.1%) were diagnosed as benign tumors by FNAB. The initial success rate was just 50% for cystic SRMs. Complicated cystic SRMs account for 5.9% of all with a 50% benignity rate. The FNAB group had a significant lower ratio of RN than non-FNAB group (74.7% vs. 93%, p = 0.001, Pearson Chi-square test).

CONCLUSION

FNAB is safe and effective for SRMs without chance of NSS, and it could significantly reduce unnecessary RN.

Cell cycle progression score has potential prognostic value for stage T1 renal cell carcinomas

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing effort to identify a biomarker which predicts metastatic progression of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score biomarker in predicting metastasis in RCC after local resection of pathologic T1 disease.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Pathologic T1 tumors at the University of Iowa were reviewed in patients who had a radical or partial nephrectomy between 1995 and 2010. Patients with known or suspected metastasis, who had received chemotherapy, or who developed metastasis within 60 days of surgery were excluded. Final analysis included 163 patients with RCC who developed metastasis or a new primary within 5 years after surgery or had been followed for 5 years without developing metastasis.

INTERVENTION(S)

Expression levels of 31 cell cycle genes and 15 control genes from the tumor were measured and reported as a CCP score.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the development of a metastasis or new primary within 5 years of resection was calculated for varying CCP score cutoffs.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 4 (2.5%) patients developed metastasis and 7 (4.3%) developed a new primary renal tumor. A CCP score of >-0.25 had a 100% sensitivity and 43% specificity for predicting metastatic progression. A CCP score of >-0.7 had a 100% sensitivity and 20% specificity for predicting the development of a new renal primary.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCP score has potential prognostic value in predicting metastatic progression and might be a useful tool for the management of patients with RCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study we looked at the utility of a particular gene expression profile from kidney tumors. We found that this gene expression test has the potential to identify tumors at risk of metastasis and thus could be a useful tool in the management of patients with kidney tumors.

Update on Indications for Percutaneous Renal Mass Biopsy in the Era of Advanced CT and MRI

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this article is to review the burgeoning role of percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB). CONCLUSION. Percutaneous RMB is safe, accurate, and indicated for an expanded list of clinical scenarios. The chief scenarios among them are to prevent treatment of benign masses and help select patients for active surveillance (AS). Imaging characterization of renal masses has improved; however, management decisions often depend on a histologic diagnosis and an assessment of biologic behavior of renal cancers, both of which are currently best achieved with RMB.

Collagen organization of renal cell carcinoma differs between low and high grade tumors

Background

The traditional pathologic grading for human renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has low concordance between biopsy and surgical specimen. There is a need to investigate adjunctive pathology technique that does not rely on the nuclear morphology that defines the traditional grading. Changes in collagen organization in the extracellular matrix have been linked to prognosis or grade in breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers, but collagen organization has never been correlated with RCC grade. In this study, we used Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) based imaging to quantify possible differences in collagen organization between high and low grades of human RCC.

Methods

A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed from RCC tumor specimens. Each TMA core represents an individual patient. A 5 μm section from the TMA tissue was stained with standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Bright field images of the H&E stained TMA were used to annotate representative RCC regions. In this study, 70 grade 1 cores and 51 grade 4 cores were imaged on a custom-built forward SHG microscope, and images were analyzed using established software tools to automatically extract and quantify collagen fibers for alignment and density assessment. A linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts to account for the within-patient correlation was created to compare grade 1 vs. grade 4 measurements and the statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Both collagen density and alignment differed significantly between RCC grade 1 and RCC grade 4. Specifically, collagen fiber density was greater in grade 4 than in grade 1 RCC (p < 0.001). Collagen fibers were also more aligned in grade 4 compared to grade 1 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Collagen density and alignment were shown to be significantly higher in RCC grade 4 vs. grade 1. This technique of biopsy sampling by SHG could complement classical tumor grading approaches. Furthermore it might allow biopsies to be more clinically relevant by informing diagnostics. Future studies are required to investigate the functional role of collagen organization in RCC.

Personalized Treatment for Small Renal Tumors: Decision Analysis of Competing Causes of Mortality

Purpose To compare the effectiveness of personalized treatment for small (≤4 cm) renal tumors versus routine partial nephrectomy (PN), accounting for various competing causes of mortality. Materials and Methods A state-transition microsimulation model was constructed to compare life expectancy of management strategies for small renal tumors by using 1 000 000 simulations in the following ways: routine PN or personalized treatment involving percutaneous ablation for risk factors for worsening chronic kidney disease (CKD), and otherwise PN; biopsy, with triage of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to PN or ablation depending on risk factors for worsening CKD; active surveillance for growth; and active surveillance when MRI findings are indicative of papillary RCC. Transition probabilities were incorporated from the literature. Effects of parameter variability were assessed in sensitivity analysis. Results In patients of all ages with normal renal function, routine PN yielded the longest life expectancy (eg, 0.67 years in 65-year-old men with nephrometry score [NS] of 4). Otherwise, personalized strategies extended life expectancy versus routine PN: in CKD stages 2 or 3a, moderate or high NS, and no comorbidities, MRI guidance for active surveillance extended life expectancy (eg, 2.60 years for MRI vs PN in CKD 3a, NS 10); and with Charlson comorbidity index of 1 or more, biopsy or active surveillance for growth extended life expectancy (eg, 2.70 years for surveillance for growth in CKD 3a, NS 10). CKD 3b was most effectively managed by using MRI to help predict papillary RCC for surveillance. Conclusion For patients with chronic kidney disease and small renal tumors, personalized treatment selection likely extends life expectancy. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Surveillance versus ablation for incidentally diagnosed small renal tumours: the SURAB feasibility RCT

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty around the appropriate management of small renal tumours. Treatments include partial nephrectomy, ablation and active surveillance.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the feasibility of a randomised trial of ablation versus active surveillance.

DESIGN

Two-stage feasibility study: stage 1 - clinician survey and co-design work; and stage 2 - randomised feasibility study with qualitative and economic components.

METHODS

Stage 1 - survey of radiologists and urologists, and development of patient information materials. Stage 2 - patients identified across eight UK centres with small renal tumours (< 4 cm) were randomised (1 : 1 ratio) to ablation or active surveillance in an unblinded manner. Randomisation was carried out by a central computer system. The primary objective was to determine willingness to participate and to randomise a target of 60 patients. The qualitative and economic data were collected separately.

RESULTS

The trial was conducted across eight centres, with a site-specific period of recruitment ranging from 3 to 11 months. Of the 154 patients screened, 36 were eligible and were provided with study details. Seven agreed to be randomised and one patient was found ineligible following biopsy results. Six patients (17% of those eligible) were randomised: three patients received ablation and no serious adverse events were recorded. The 3- and 6-month data were collected for four (67%) and three (50%) out of the six patients, respectively. The qualitative substudy identified factors directly impacting on the recruitment of this trial. These included patient and clinician preferences, organisational factors (variation in clinical pathway) and standard treatment not included. The health economic questionnaire was designed and piloted; however, the sample size of recruited patients was insufficient to draw a conclusion on the feasibility of the health economics.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial did not meet the criteria for progression and the recruitment rate was lower than hypothesised, demonstrating that a full trial is presently not possible. The qualitative study identified factors that led to variation in recruitment across the sites. Implementation of organisational and operational measures can increase recruitment in any future trial. There was insufficient information to conduct a full economic analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31161700.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 81. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Growth rates and outcomes of observed large renal masses

INTRODUCTION

The natural history of small renal masses has been well defined, leading to the recommendation of active surveillance in some patients with limited life expectancy. However, this information is less clear for large renal masses (LRM), leading to ambiguity for management in the older, comorbid patient. The objective of this study was to define the natural history, including the growth rate and metastatic risk, of LRM in order to better counsel patients regarding active surveillance.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with solid renal masses >4 cm that had repeated imaging identified from an institutional imaging database. Patient comorbidities and outcomes were obtained through retrospective chart analysis. Outcomes assessed included tumour growth and metastatic rates, as well as cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) usimg Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

We identified 69 patients between 2005 and 2016 who met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at study entry was 75.5 years; mean tumour maximal dimension at study entry was 5.6 cm. CSS was 83% and OS 63% for patients presenting without metastasis, with a mean followup of 57.5 months. The mean growth rate of those that developed metastasis during followup (n=15) was 0.98 cm/year (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-1.63) as compared to those that did not develop metastasis (n=46), with a growth rate of 0.67 cm/year (95% CI 0.34-1) (non-significant). Seven patients had evidence of metastasis at the baseline imaging of their LRM and had subsequent growth rate of 1.47 cm/year (95% CI 0.37-2.57) (non-significant) CONCLUSIONS: Compared to small renal masses, LRM are associated with higher metastasis rates and lower CSS and more rapid growth rates. Selection criteria for recommending observation of LRM in older, comorbid patients should be more conservative than for small renal masses.

Imaging Protocols for Active Surveillance in Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the growth kinetics of small renal masses and available imaging modalities for mass characterization and surveillance, highlight current organizational recommendations for the active surveillance of small renal masses, and discuss the most recently reported oncological outcomes of patients as they relate to various surveillance imaging protocols and progression to delayed intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall, organizational guideline recommendations are broad and lack specifics regarding timing and modality for follow-up imaging of small renal masses. Additionally, despite general consensus in the literature about certain criteria to trigger delayed intervention, there exist no formal guidelines. Active surveillance of small renal masses is an acceptable management strategy for patients with prohibitive surgical risk; however, standardized imaging protocols for surveillance are lacking, as are randomized, prospective trials to evaluate the ideal follow-up protocol.

The natural history of large renal masses followed on observation

PURPOSE

The safety and feasibility of active surveillance in comorbid patients with renal masses ≥4.0cm is uncertain. The aim of this study is to describe our institutional experience with the observation of large renal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients were identified with renal masses ≥ 4.0cm that were followed on observation for at least 6 months without surgical intervention between 1994 and 2016. Linear regression was conducted to determine predictors for renal mass growth and competing risk methods were used to estimate the probability of progression in the setting of death from other causes.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 73 years and 73% of patients had a Charlson Comorbidity index ≥ 4. At presentation, the median mass size was 4.9cm. The median growth rate was 0.4cm/y and there were no significant predictors of growth. Surveillance was discontinued in 34 patients who underwent delayed intervention. Median follow up for metastasis-free survivors was 4 years. In total, 10 patients developed metastatic disease, 3 died from kidney cancer and 30 patients died from other causes. The 5-year probability of other cause mortality was 22% (95% CI: 14%-32%) compared to 6% (95% CI: 2%-13%) for metastatic progression of kidney cancer.

CONCLUSION

In highly comorbid patients, the observation of large renal masses has low likelihood for metastatic progression relative to the risk of nonkidney cancer related death. This data supports the use of surveillance as an acceptable strategy for highly selected patients with competing risks from other serious illnesses.

Improving needle biopsy accuracy in small renal mass using tumor-specific DNA methylation markers

Purpose

The clinical management of small renal masses (SRMs) is challenging since the current methods for distinguishing between benign masses and malignant renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are frequently inaccurate or inconclusive. In addition, renal cancer subtypes also have different treatments and outcomes. High false negative rates increase the risk of cancer progression and indeterminate diagnoses result in unnecessary and potentially morbid surgical procedures.

Experimental Design

We built a predictive classification model for kidney tumors using 697 DNA methylation profiles from six different subgroups: clear cell, papillary and chromophobe RCC, benign angiomylolipomas, oncocytomas, and normal kidney tissues. Furthermore, the DNA methylation-dependent classifier has been validated in 272 ex vivo needle biopsy samples from 100 renal masses (71% SRMs).

Results

In general, the results were highly reproducible (89%, n=70) in predicting identical malignant subtypes from biopsies. Overall, 98% of adjacent-normals (n=102) were correctly classified as normal, while 92% of tumors (n=71) were correctly classified malignant and 86% of benign (n=29) were correctly classified benign by this classification model.

Conclusions

Overall, this study provides molecular-based support for using routine needle biopsies to determine tumor classification of SRMs and support the clinical decision-making.

Multiple growth periods predict unfavourable pathology in patients with small renal masses

OBJECTIVE

To use the number of positive growth periods as a characterization of the growth of small renal masses in order to determine potential predictors of malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent axial imaging at multiple time points prior to surgical resection for a small renal mass were queried. Patients were categorized based on their pathological tumour grade and stage: favourable (benign, chromophobe and low-grade pT1-2 renal cell carcinoma [RCC]) vs unfavourable (high-grade of any stage and low-grade pT3-4 RCC). A positive growth period was counted each time the difference in greatest tumour diameters between two images was positive. The Cochran-Armitage trend test and Somers' D association were used to determine if the number of positive growth periods was correlated with unfavourable pathology.

RESULTS

Of the 124 patients, 86 (69.4%) had favourable pathology and 38 (30.6%) had unfavourable pathology. Those who had favourable pathology were younger than those who had unfavourable pathology: median (interquartile range [IQR]) 61.0 (52.2-66.0) vs 68.5 (61.5-77.0); P < 0.001. The overall growth rate was higher in the unfavourable group, but was not statistically significant: mean (sd) 0.7 (1.7) vs 1.6 (2.8) cm/year; P = 0.07. There was a significant trend difference in the number of positive growth periods between favourability groups (P = 0.02). An association between increased number of positive growth periods and unfavourable pathology was observed: 0.15 (95% confidence interval 0.02, 0.29). The ratios of favourable to unfavourable pathology were 1.8, 1.0, 0.66, 0.59 and 0 as the number of positive growth periods increased from 0 to 4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While overall growth rate was not predictive of pathology favourability, there was a positive association between the number of positive growth periods and unfavourable pathology. The number of positive growth periods may be a potential parameter for malignant potential in patients undergoing active surveillance for small renal masses.

Update on Screening for Urological Malignancies

Urological malignancies are a major source of morbidity and mortality in men over 40. Screening for those malignancies has a potential benefit of reducing both. However, even after more than two decades of screening for prostate cancer, the implications of most resulting information are still a matter of debate. Controversy extends over several aspects of prostate cancer screening programs, including age of onset, defining populations at risk, most appropriate intervals, as well as the optimal methods to be used for screening. The medical community is still divided regarding the effectiveness of prostate cancer-related death prevention and its benefits-to-harms ratio, reflecting an inconsistency regarding screening recommendations. Similarly, benefits of screening for urothelial and kidney tumors are yet lacking high-level evidence, although recent evidence supports screening of populations at risk. Clearly, the current era of evolving molecular and genetic biomarkers harbors the potential to change screening practice. In this paper, we review current guidelines as well as giving an update on new developments which might influence screening strategies in common urological malignancies.

[Percutaneous renal ablation: Pre-, per-, post-interventional evaluation modalities and adapted management]

OBJECTIVES

Ablative treatment (AT) rise is foreseen, validation of steps to insure good proceedings is needed. By looking over the process of the patient, this study evaluates the requirements and choices needed in every step of the management.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, using (MeSH) words and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance.

RESULTS

Explanations of AT proposal rather than partial nephrectomy or surveillance have to be discussed in a consultation shared by urologist and interventional radiologist. Per-procedure choices depend on predictable ballistic difficulties. High volume, proximity of the hilum or of a risky organ are in favor of general anesthesia, cryotherapy and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Percutaneous approach should be privileged, as it seems as effective as the laparoscopic approach. Early and delayed complications have to be treated both by urologist and radiologist. Surveillance by CT/MRI insure of the lack of contrast-enhanced in the treated area. Patients and tumors criteria, in case of incomplete treatment or recurrence, are the key of the appropriate treatment: surgery, second session of AT, surveillance.

CONCLUSION

AT treatments require patient's comprehension, excellent coordination of the partnership between urologist and radiologist and relevant choices during intervention.

Focal ablation therapy for renal cancer in the era of active surveillance and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy

Partial nephrectomy is the optimal surgical approach in the management of small renal masses (SRMs). Focal ablation therapy has an established role in the modern management of SRMs, especially in elderly patients and those with comorbidities. Percutaneous ablation avoids general anaesthesia and laparoscopic ablation can avoid excessive dissection; hence, these techniques can be suitable for patients who are not ideal surgical candidates. Several ablation modalities exist, of which radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation are most widely applied and for which safety and oncological efficacy approach equivalency to partial nephrectomy. Data supporting efficacy and safety of ablation techniques continue to mature, but they originate in institutional case series that are confounded by cohort heterogeneity, selection bias, and lack of long-term follow-up periods. Image guidance and surveillance protocols after ablation vary and no consensus has been established. The importance of SRM biopsy, its optimal timing, the type of biopsy used, and its role in treatment selection continue to be debated. As safety data for active surveillance and experience with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy are expanding, the role of focal ablation therapy in the treatment of patients with SRMs requires continued evaluation.

Active Surveillance of Nonfatty Renal Masses in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Use of CT Features and Patterns of Growth to Differentiate Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report our experience with active surveillance of nonfatty renal masses in a large cohort of patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), correlate their CT features and patterns of growth with histopathology results, and provide guidelines for management.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Yearly CT examinations were performed of 367 women (age range, 21-75 years; mean age, 47 years). For the 31 patients with 37 nonfatty renal masses that were biopsied, excised, or followed for ≥ 5 years, CT enhancement characteristics and patterns of growth were compared with the histopathology results.

RESULTS

Four of 37 nonfatty renal masses were biopsied without follow-up CT examinations: Two were heterogeneous renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), one was a heterogeneous nonfatty angiomyolipoma (AML), and one was homogeneous nonfatty AML. In the remaining 33 nonfatty renal masses with multiple follow-up CT examinations, two growth patterns were identified. Four showed a continuous increase in size of > 0.5 cm/y in some years, and all four in this first group were heterogeneous and were biopsy-proven RCC. The second group was composed of the remaining 29 masses. These 29 masses showed yearly no change, increase, or decrease in diameter. Eight were heterogeneous, and 21 were homogeneous. Of the masses showing a yearly increase, the increase was < 0.5 cm/y in all except one. In the one exception, the increase followed a decrease. Nine of the 29 masses were biopsied, and all nine were nonfatty renal masses (five homogeneous, four heterogeneous).

CONCLUSION

Our data provide further evidence in a large prospective study with longterm follow-up that active surveillance is an appropriate strategy in the management of nonfatty renal masses in patients with LAM. Our analysis of the growth patterns reveals duration of growth in addition to growth rate as criteria for biopsy or excision. Biopsy should be reserved for nonfatty renal masses that show sustained growth or growth > 0.5 cm/y during follow-up.

Delayed Intervention of Small Renal Masses on Active Surveillance

Although surgical excision is the standard of therapy for small renal masses (SRMs), there is a growing recognition of active surveillance as an option in select patients who are poor surgical candidates or who have shorter life expectancy. A number of patients on expectant management, however, subsequently advance to definitive therapy. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature and performed a pooled analysis of active surveillance series to evaluate the rate and indications for definitive treatment after initiating a period of active surveillance. Fourteen clinical series (1245 patients; 1364 lesions) met our selection criteria. Mean lesion size at presentation was 2.30 ± 0.40 cm with a mean follow-up of 33.6 ± 16.9 months. Collectively, 34.0% of patients underwent delayed intervention, which ranged in individual series from 3.6% to 70.3%. Of patients undergoing delayed intervention, the average time on active surveillance prior to definitive treatment was 27.8 ± 10.6 months. A pooled analysis revealed that 41.0% of patients underwent therapy secondary to tumor growth rate and 51.9% secondary to patient or physician preference in the absence of clinical progression. Overall, 1.1% of all patients progressed to metastatic disease during the average follow-up period. Thus, active surveillance may be an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with SRMs. However, delayed treatment is pursued in a significant percentage of patients within 3 years. Prospective registries and clinical trials with standardized indications for delayed intervention are needed to establish true rates of disease progressions and recommendations for delayed intervention.

Surveillance of Small Renal Masses

The widespread utilization of imaging has led to an increasing incidence of small renal masses (SRMs). However, at least 20% are benign. Nevertheless, nephron-sparing surgery is the standard treatment for SRMs without pretreatment characterization with biopsy. Elderly patients and patients with multiple comorbidities and limited life expectancy may safely be managed with active surveillance with low risk of disease progression and mortality. An initial period of observation to determine tumor growth kinetics is safe and appropriate in select candidates. Renal tumor biopsy is accurate, safe and should be considered for SRMs prior to finalizing treatment plans.

Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology

Representing 2%-3% of adult cancers, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 90% of renal malignancies and is the most lethal neoplasm of the urologic system. Over the last 65 years, the incidence of RCC has increased at a rate of 2% per year. The increased incidence is at least partly due to improved tumor detection secondary to greater availability of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging modalities over the last few decades. Most RCCs are asymptomatic at discovery and are detected as unexpected findings on imaging performed for unrelated clinical indications. The 2004 World Health Organization Classification of adult renal tumors stratifies RCC into several distinct histologic subtypes of which clear cell, papillary and chromophobe tumors account for 70%, 10%-15%, and 5%, respectively. Knowledge of the RCC subtype is important because the various subtypes are associated with different biologic behavior, prognosis and treatment options. Furthermore, the common RCC subtypes can often be discriminated non-invasively based on gross morphologic imaging appearances, signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images, and the degree of tumor enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging examinations. In this article, we review the incidence and survival data, risk factors, clinical and biochemical findings, imaging findings, staging, differential diagnosis, management options and post-treatment follow-up of RCC, with attention focused on the common subtypes.

Tumor Growth Kinetics and Oncologic Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Residual Renal Tumor following Percutaneous Thermal Ablation

PURPOSE

To evaluate growth kinetics and oncologic outcomes of patients with renal tumors undergoing active surveillance (AS) for residual viable tumor following percutaneous ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following percutaneous thermal ablation, residual tumor was detected in 21/133 (16%) patients on initial follow-up imaging, and AS was undertaken in 17/21 (81%) patients. Initial tumor volumes and volumes after ablation were assessed from cross-sectional imaging to calculate volumetric growth rate (VGR) and volume doubling time (VDT) of residual tumor. The rate of metastasis, overall survival, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC)-specific survival were compared between patients in the AS group and in the routine follow up group of patients who did not have residual tumor.

RESULTS

Median tumor volume prior to ablation, after first ablation, and at final follow-up were 25 cm(3), 6 cm(3), and 6 cm(3), respectively, in patients with residual tumor. Stable, mild, and moderate VGR occurred in 8/17 (47%), 4/17 (24%), and 5/17 (29%) cases, respectively. The 4 cases with fastest VDT underwent delayed intervention with ablation (n = 1) and nephrectomy (n = 3) without subsequent residual, recurrence, or metastasis. There was no significant difference in the rates of RCC metastasis, overall survival, or RCC-specific survival between AS and routine follow-up groups. Metastatic RCC and subsequent death occurred in 1 patient in the AS group, after the patient had refused offers for retreatment for local progression over 60.7 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases when patients are not amenable to further intervention, AS of residual tumor may be an acceptable alternative and allows for successful delayed intervention when needed.

Natural history of small renal masses

Objective:

To review the natural history and growth kinetics of small renal masses (SRMs).

Data Sources:

The literature concerning natural history and growth kinetics of SRMs was collected from PubMed published from 1990 to 2014.

Study Selection:

We included all the relevant articles on the active surveillance (AS) or delayed treatment for SRMs in English, with no limitation of study design.

Results:

SRMs under AS have a slow growth potential in general. The mean linear growth rate is 0.33 cm/year, the mean volumetric growth rate is 9.48 cm³/year. The rate of metastasis during AS is below 2%. Some factors are associated with the growth rate of SRMs, including tumor grade, histological subtype, initial tumor size, age, radiographic characteristics, and molecular markers. No definite predictor of growth rate of SRMs is defined at present. SRMs with high tumor grade and the subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma may have aggressive growth potential.

Conclusions:

AS is a reasonable choice for elderly patients with SRMs, who are at high risk from surgery. Progression during observation is the biggest concern while performing AS. There is no definite predictor of progression for SRMs under AS. Percutaneous renal biopsy providing immunohistological and genic biomarkers may improve the understanding of natural history of SRMs.

Active surveillance in prostate cancer: a concept analysis

AIM

To report an analysis of the concept of active surveillance.

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer has become more prevalent since the introduction of PSA screening, however, many men are diagnosed with low-risk disease that may not require treatment. Active surveillance is a treatment strategy used to avoid treatment and related adverse effects when immediate treatment is not necessary. A universal definition is lacking.

DESIGN

Concept analysis.

DATA SOURCES

The CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched for literature published between 1980 and 2014 using the term active surveillance.

METHODS

The method of Walker and Avant (2010) was used to analyse the concept of active surveillance, specifically within the context of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Key attributes of active surveillance emerging from the analysis include: regular and purposeful monitoring, early detection of disease progression and planned curative intervention if necessary. Multiple terms are used in the literature to refer to the concept of active surveillance. Active surveillance can cause uncertainty, and prompt men to make lifestyle changes and seek more information on prostate cancer.

CONCLUSION

Active surveillance is not well understood, and ambiguity remains around the concept. Active surveillance and watchful waiting are used interchangeably in the literature and in clinical practice, but in fact do not refer to the same strategy. Active surveillance can generate significant uncertainty for the patient and family, which may be a barrier to choosing it as a treatment strategy and nursing research in this area is limited.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses need a clear understanding of active surveillance and how it differs from other strategies in order to reduce ambiguity around the concept. Nurses must be aware of the uncertainty accompanying active surveillance, and a need exists for continued nursing research in this area.

CLINICAL FEATURES OF 15 PATIENTS UNDER SURVEILLANCE FOR RENAL MASSES

(Objective) We investigated the clinical features of patients under surveillance for localized renal masses. (Methods) This study was a retrospective analysis of 15 patients who were diagnosed as having clinically localized renal cell carcinoma and were placed under surveillance and 68 patients who underwent immediate radical operation for renal masses. (Results) The age at diagnosis in the surveillance group was significantly higher than in the immediate operation group (median, 81 vs. 65 years, respectively, P<0.01). The Charlson Comorbidity Index in the surveillance group was significantly higher than in the immediate operation group (median, 5 vs. 2, respectively, P<0.01) and 10 patients (67%) had complications, which was one of the reasons for surveillance. The median initial tumor size in the surveillance group was 2.5 cm (1.5-10.1). There was no significant difference in the tumor size between the two groups. During a median follow-up of 19 months (6-55) the median tumor growth rate was 0.29 cm per year (-0.19-0.65) in the surveillance group. Of the 15 patients with computed tomography follow-up, four underwent surgical resection of the renal masses after surveillance. The histological diagnosis was clear cell renal cell carcinoma in all four. During follow-up, two patients died of other causes and one patient had bone metastasis but there was no death related to the renal masses in the surveillance group. (Conclusions) The appropriateness of the surveillance should be considered when we initiate surveillance for patients with renal masses because metastasis was detected in one patient in this study. On the other hand, surveillance may be an acceptable management method for elderly or severely comorbid patients because there were two deaths from other causes in the surveillance group.

Prediction of renal mass aggressiveness using clinical and radiographic features: a global, multicentre prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the ability of preoperative clinical characteristics to predict histological features of renal masses (RMs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from consecutive patients with clinical stage I RMs treated surgically between 2010 and 2011 in the Clinical Research Office of Endourology Society (CROES) Renal Mass Registry were collected. Based on surgical histology, tumours were categorised as benign, low- or high-aggressiveness cancer. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of the histological group by clinical and radiographic features in the entire cohort and a subcohort of cT1a tumours. The performance of the models was studied by calibration, Nagelkerke's R(2) , and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 2 224 patients with a clinical stage I RM, of which 1 367 (61%) were cT1a. Benign lesions were found in 369 (16.6%), low-aggressiveness tumours in 1 156 (52%) and high-aggressiveness tumours in 699 (31.4%). Male gender, smoking history, increased tumour size, and lower exophytic rate were associated with malignancy and high-aggressiveness features (all P < 0.05). Models developed based on these characteristics had the ability to discriminate benign from malignant (bootstrap corrected c-index of 0.64) and high-aggressiveness tumours from benign and low-aggressiveness tumours (bootstrap corrected c-index of 0.66). Similar results were achieved in the cT1a subgroup. The c-index of tumour diameter as a single predictor of malignancy and high-aggressiveness tumours in the entire cohort was 0.6 and 0.63, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although older age, male gender, smoking history, increased tumour diameter, and reduced exophytic rate are associated with malignancy and high aggressiveness of clinical stage I RMs, models incorporating these characteristics have modest discriminating power, being only slightly better than the predictive ability of tumour size alone.

MRI features of renal cell carcinoma that predict favorable clinicopathologic outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to determine whether MRI features of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), such as enhancing solid component and T1 signal intensity, are associated with clinicopathologic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 241 RCCs in 230 patients who underwent preoperative MRI, had pathologic analysis results available, and were monitored for at least 3 months. A radiologist assessed tumor features on MRI, including unenhanced T1 signal relative to renal cortex and the percentage of solid enhancing components. The electronic medical record or follow-up images were reviewed to assess for the development of local recurrence or metastases. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate imaging features at MRI with pathologic and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

The following tumor features were observed: predominantly cystic morphologic features (defined as solid component≤25%, n=33), solid component greater than 25% (n=208), T1 hypointensity (n=97), and T1 intermediate intensity or hyperintensity (n=144). Local recurrence or metastases were observed in 14 patients. Compared with T1-intermediate or -hyperintense lesions, T1-hypointense RCCs were more likely to be low stage (90.7% vs 74.3%; p=0.001) and low grade (78.9% vs 41.8%; p<0.001) and had a lower rate of recurrence or metastases (3.3% vs 8%; p=0.167). Compared with lesions with greater than 25% solid enhancement, predominantly cystic RCCs were more likely to be lower stage (93.9% vs 78.8%; p=0.053) and lower grade (94.7 vs 56.5%; p<0.001) and to have no incidence of recurrence or metastasis (0% vs 6.9%; p=0.227). RCCs that were both cystic and T1 hypointense (n=14) were lower stage (100% vs 79.6%; p=0.047) and lower grade (92.9% vs 58.1%; p=0.01) and had no recurrence or metastases on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Cystic and T1-hypointense RCC show less-aggressive pathologic features and favorable clinical behavior.

The natural history and predictors for intervention in patients with small renal mass undergoing active surveillance

Aim. To describe the natural history of small renal mass on active surveillance and identify parameters that could help in predicting the need for intervention in patients with small renal masses undergoing active surveillance. We also discuss the need for renal biopsy in the management of these patients. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 78 renal masses ≤4 cm diagnosed at our Urology Department at Bnai Zion Medical Center between September 2003 and March 2012. Results. Seventy patients with 78 small renal masses were analyzed. The mean age at diagnosis was 68 years (47-89). The mean follow-up period was 34 months (12-112). In 54 of 78 masses there was a growth of at least 2 mm between imaging on last available follow-up and diagnosis. Eight of the 54 (15%) masses which grew in size underwent a nephron-sparing surgery, of which two were oncocytomas and six were renal cell carcinoma. Growth rate and mass diameter on diagnosis were significantly greater in the group of patients who underwent a surgery. Conclusions. Small renal masses might eventually be managed by active surveillance without compromising survival or surgical approach. All masses that were eventually excised underwent a nephron-sparing surgery. None of the patients developed metastases.

Is anatomic complexity associated with renal tumor growth kinetics under active surveillance?

INTRODUCTION

Linear growth rate (LGR) is the most commonly employed trigger for definitive intervention in patients with renal masses managed with an initial period of active surveillance (AS). Using our institutional cohort, we explored the association between tumor anatomic complexity at presentation and LGR in patients managed with AS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Enhancing renal masses managed expectantly for at least 6 months were included for analysis. The association between Nephrometry Score and LGR was assessed using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for the age, Charlson score, race, sex, and initial tumor size.

RESULTS

Overall, 346 patients (401 masses) met the inclusion criteria (18% ≥ cT1b), with a median follow-up of 37 months (range: 6-169). Of these, 44% patients showed progression to definitive intervention with a median duration of 27 months (range: 6-130). On comparing patients managed expectantly to those requiring intervention, no difference was seen in median tumor size at presentation (2.2 vs. 2.2 cm), whereas significant differences in median age (74 vs. 65 y, P < 0.001), Charlson comorbidity score (3 vs. 2, P<0.001), and average LGR (0.23 vs. 0.49 cm/y, P < 0.001) were observed between groups. Following adjustment, for each 1-point increase in Nephrometry Score sum, the average tumor LGR increased by 0.037 cm/y (P = 0.002). Of the entire cohort, 6 patients (1.7%) showed progression to metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The demonstrated association between anatomic tumor complexity at presentation and renal masses of LGR of clinical stage 1 under AS may afford a clinically useful cue to tailor individual patient radiographic surveillance schedules and warrants further evaluation.

Can we negotiate with a tumor?

Recent progress in deciphering the molecular portraits of tumors promises an era of more personalized drug choices. However, current protocols still follow standard fixed-time schedules, which is not entirely coherent with the common observation that most tumors do not grow continuously. This unpredictability of the increases in tumor mass is not necessarily an obstacle to therapeutic efficiency, particularly if tumor dynamics could be exploited. We propose a model of tumor mass evolution as the integrated result of the dynamics of two linked complex systems, tumor cell population and tumor microenvironment, and show the practical relevance of this nonlinear approach.