1
|
McGenity C, Clarke EL, Jennings C, Matthews G, Cartlidge C, Freduah-Agyemang H, Stocken DD, Treanor D. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7:114. [PMID: 38704465 PMCID: PMC11069583 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01106-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Ensuring diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) before introduction into clinical practice is essential. Growing numbers of studies using AI for digital pathology have been reported over recent years. The aim of this work is to examine the diagnostic accuracy of AI in digital pathology images for any disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis included diagnostic accuracy studies using any type of AI applied to whole slide images (WSIs) for any disease. The reference standard was diagnosis by histopathological assessment and/or immunohistochemistry. Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL in June 2022. Risk of bias and concerns of applicability were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data extraction was conducted by two investigators and meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate random effects model, with additional subgroup analyses also performed. Of 2976 identified studies, 100 were included in the review and 48 in the meta-analysis. Studies were from a range of countries, including over 152,000 whole slide images (WSIs), representing many diseases. These studies reported a mean sensitivity of 96.3% (CI 94.1-97.7) and mean specificity of 93.3% (CI 90.5-95.4). There was heterogeneity in study design and 99% of studies identified for inclusion had at least one area at high or unclear risk of bias or applicability concerns. Details on selection of cases, division of model development and validation data and raw performance data were frequently ambiguous or missing. AI is reported as having high diagnostic accuracy in the reported areas but requires more rigorous evaluation of its performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare McGenity
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | - Emily L Clarke
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Charlotte Jennings
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Darren Treanor
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Centre for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carrie S, Fouweather T, Homer T, O'Hara J, Rousseau N, Rooshenas L, Bray A, Stocken DD, Ternent L, Rennie K, Clark E, Waugh N, Steel AJ, Dooley J, Drinnan M, Hamilton D, Lloyd K, Oluboyede Y, Wilson C, Gardiner Q, Kara N, Khwaja S, Leong SC, Maini S, Morrison J, Nix P, Wilson JA, Teare MD. Effectiveness of septoplasty compared to medical management in adults with obstruction associated with a deviated nasal septum: the NAIROS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-213. [PMID: 38477237 PMCID: PMC11017631 DOI: 10.3310/mvfr4028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The indications for septoplasty are practice-based, rather than evidence-based. In addition, internationally accepted guidelines for the management of nasal obstruction associated with nasal septal deviation are lacking. Objective The objective was to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of septoplasty, with or without turbinate reduction, compared with medical management, in the management of nasal obstruction associated with a deviated nasal septum. Design This was a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing septoplasty, with or without turbinate reduction, with defined medical management; it incorporated a mixed-methods process evaluation and an economic evaluation. Setting The trial was set in 17 NHS secondary care hospitals in the UK. Participants A total of 378 eligible participants aged > 18 years were recruited. Interventions Participants were randomised on a 1: 1 basis and stratified by baseline severity and gender to either (1) septoplasty, with or without turbinate surgery (n = 188) or (2) medical management with intranasal steroid spray and saline spray (n = 190). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 items score at 6 months (patient-reported outcome). The secondary outcomes were as follows: patient-reported outcomes - Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score at 6 and 12 months, Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 items subscales at 12 months, Double Ordinal Airway Subjective Scale at 6 and 12 months, the Short Form questionnaire-36 items and costs; objective measurements - peak nasal inspiratory flow and rhinospirometry. The number of adverse events experienced was also recorded. A within-trial economic evaluation from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective estimated the incremental cost per (1) improvement (of ≥ 9 points) in Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 items score, (2) adverse event avoided and (3) quality-adjusted life-year gained at 12 months. An economic model estimated the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained at 24 and 36 months. A mixed-methods process evaluation was undertaken to understand/address recruitment issues and examine the acceptability of trial processes and treatment arms. Results At the 6-month time point, 307 participants provided primary outcome data (septoplasty, n = 152; medical management, n = 155). An intention-to-treat analysis revealed a greater and more sustained improvement in the primary outcome measure in the surgical arm. The 6-month mean Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 items scores were -20.0 points lower (better) for participants randomised to septoplasty than for those randomised to medical management [the score for the septoplasty arm was 19.9 and the score for the medical management arm was 39.5 (95% confidence interval -23.6 to -16.4; p < 0.0001)]. This was confirmed by sensitivity analyses and through the analysis of secondary outcomes. Outcomes were statistically significantly related to baseline severity, but not to gender or turbinate reduction. In the surgical and medical management arms, 132 and 95 adverse events occurred, respectively; 14 serious adverse events occurred in the surgical arm and nine in the medical management arm. On average, septoplasty was more costly and more effective in improving Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 items scores and quality-adjusted life-years than medical management, but incurred a larger number of adverse events. Septoplasty had a 15% probability of being considered cost-effective at 12 months at a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold for an additional quality-adjusted life-year. This probability increased to 99% and 100% at 24 and 36 months, respectively. Limitations COVID-19 had an impact on participant-facing data collection from March 2020. Conclusions Septoplasty, with or without turbinate reduction, is more effective than medical management with a nasal steroid and saline spray. Baseline severity predicts the degree of improvement in symptoms. Septoplasty has a low probability of cost-effectiveness at 12 months, but may be considered cost-effective at 24 months. Future work should focus on developing a septoplasty patient decision aid. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN16168569 and EudraCT 2017-000893-12. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/226/07) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 10. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Carrie
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Honorary affiliation with Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tony Fouweather
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tara Homer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James O'Hara
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Bray
- Honorary affiliation with Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Laura Ternent
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katherine Rennie
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emma Clark
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nichola Waugh
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alison J Steel
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jemima Dooley
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Drinnan
- Honorary affiliation with Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Hamilton
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kelly Lloyd
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Yemi Oluboyede
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Caroline Wilson
- Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Quentin Gardiner
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Naveed Kara
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Darlington Memorial Hospital, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
| | - Sadie Khwaja
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Samuel Chee Leong
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Aintree Hospital, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sangeeta Maini
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Paul Nix
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Janet A Wilson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Dawn Teare
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stocken DD, Mossop H, Armstrong E, Lewis S, Dutton SJ, Peckitt C, Gamble C, Brown J. Good Statistical Practice-development of tailored Good Clinical Practice training for statisticians. Trials 2024; 25:113. [PMID: 38336761 PMCID: PMC10858586 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07940-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statisticians are fundamental in ensuring clinical research, including clinical trials, are conducted with quality, transparency, reproducibility and integrity. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) is an international quality standard for the conduct of clinical trials research. Statisticians are required to undertake training on GCP but existing training is generic and, crucially, does not cover statistical activities. This results in statisticians undertaking training mostly unrelated to their role and variation in awareness and implementation of relevant regulatory requirements with regards to statistical conduct. The need for role-relevant training is recognised by the UK NHS Health Research Authority and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). METHODS The Good Statistical Practice (GCP for Statisticians) project was instigated by the UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Registered Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) Statisticians Operational Group and funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), to develop materials to enable role-specific GCP training tailored to statisticians. Review of current GCP training was undertaken by survey. Development of training materials were based on MHRA GCP. Critical review and piloting was conducted with UKCRC CTU and NIHR researchers with comment from MHRA. Final review was conducted through the UKCRC CTU Statistics group. RESULTS The survey confirmed the need and desire for the development of dedicated GCP training for statisticians. An accessible, comprehensive, piloted training package was developed tailored to statisticians working in clinical research, particularly the clinical trials arena. The training materials cover legislation and guidance for best practice across all clinical trial processes with statistical involvement, including exercises and real-life scenarios to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Comprehensive feedback was incorporated. The training materials are freely available for national and international adoption. CONCLUSION All research staff should have training in GCP yet the training undertaken by most academic statisticians does not cover activities related to their role. The Good Statistical Practice (GCP for Statisticians) project has developed and extensively piloted new, role-specific, comprehensive, accessible GCP training tailored to statisticians working in clinical research, particularly the clinical trials arena. This role-specific training will encourage best practice, leading to transparent and reproducible statistical activity, as required by regulatory authorities and funders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Helen Mossop
- Biostatistics Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emma Armstrong
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Steff Lewis
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Susan J Dutton
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire Peckitt
- Royal Marsden and Institute for Cancer Research Clinical Trials Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Julia Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilson JA, Fouweather T, Stocken DD, Homer T, Haighton C, Rousseau N, O'Hara J, Vale L, Wilson R, Carnell S, Wilkes S, Morrison J, Ah-See K, Carrie S, Hopkins C, Howe N, Hussain M, Lindley L, MacKenzie K, McSweeney L, Mehanna H, Raine C, Whelan RS, Sullivan F, von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff A, Teare D. Tonsillectomy compared with conservative management in patients over 16 years with recurrent sore throat: the NATTINA RCT and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-195. [PMID: 38204203 PMCID: PMC11017150 DOI: 10.3310/ykur3660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The place of tonsillectomy in the management of sore throat in adults remains uncertain. Objectives To establish the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tonsillectomy, compared with conservative management, for tonsillitis in adults, and to evaluate the impact of alternative sore throat patient pathways. Design This was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing tonsillectomy with conservative management. The trial included a qualitative process evaluation and an economic evaluation. Setting The study took place at 27 NHS secondary care hospitals in Great Britain. Participants A total of 453 eligible participants with recurrent sore throats were recruited to the main trial. Interventions Patients were randomised on a 1 : 1 basis between tonsil dissection and conservative management (i.e. deferred surgery) using a variable block-stratified design, stratified by (1) centre and (2) severity. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the total number of sore throat days over 24 months following randomisation. The secondary outcome measures were the number of sore throat episodes and five characteristics from Sore Throat Alert Return, describing severity of the sore throat, use of medications, time away from usual activities and the Short Form questionnaire-12 items. Additional secondary outcomes were the Tonsil Outcome Inventory-14 total and subscales and Short Form questionnaire-12 items 6 monthly. Evaluation of the impact of alternative sore throat patient pathways by observation and statistical modelling of outcomes against baseline severity, as assessed by Tonsil Outcome Inventory-14 score at recruitment. The incremental cost per sore throat day avoided, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained based on responses to the Short Form questionnaire-12 items and the incremental net benefit based on costs and responses to a contingent valuation exercise. A qualitative process evaluation examined acceptability of trial processes and ramdomised arms. Results There was a median of 27 (interquartile range 12-52) sore throats over the 24-month follow-up. A smaller number of sore throats was reported in the tonsillectomy arm [median 23 (interquartile range 11-46)] than in the conservative management arm [median 30 (interquartile range 14-65)]. On an intention-to-treat basis, there were fewer sore throats in the tonsillectomy arm (incident rate ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.65). Sensitivity analyses confirmed this, as did the secondary outcomes. There were 52 episodes of post-operative haemorrhage reported in 231 participants undergoing tonsillectomy (22.5%). There were 47 re-admissions following tonsillectomy (20.3%), 35 relating to haemorrhage. On average, tonsillectomy was more costly and more effective in terms of both sore throat days avoided and quality-adjusted life-years gained. Tonsillectomy had a 100% probability of being considered cost-effective if the threshold for an additional quality-adjusted life year was £20,000. Tonsillectomy had a 69% probability of having a higher net benefit than conservative management. Trial processes were deemed to be acceptable. Patients who received surgery were unanimous in reporting to be happy to have received it. Limitations The decliners who provided data tended to have higher Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores than those willing to be randomised implying that patients with a higher burden of tonsillitis symptoms may have declined entry into the trial. Conclusions The tonsillectomy arm had fewer sore throat days over 24 months than the conservative management arm, and had a high probability of being considered cost-effective over the ranges considered. Further work should focus on when tonsillectomy should be offered. National Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults has assessed the effectiveness of tonsillectomy when offered for the current UK threshold of disease burden. Further research is required to define the minimum disease burden at which tonsillectomy becomes clinically effective and cost-effective. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN55284102. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/146/06) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 31. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet A Wilson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tony Fouweather
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Tara Homer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Catherine Haighton
- Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - James O'Hara
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rebecca Wilson
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sonya Carnell
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Scott Wilkes
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | | | - Kim Ah-See
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sean Carrie
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Ear, Nose and Throat and Head and Neck Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicola Howe
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Kenneth MacKenzie
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lorraine McSweeney
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hisham Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christopher Raine
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ruby Smith Whelan
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Frank Sullivan
- Population and Behavioural Science Division, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | | | - Dawn Teare
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carrie S, O'Hara J, Fouweather T, Homer T, Rousseau N, Rooshenas L, Bray A, Stocken DD, Ternent L, Rennie K, Clark E, Waugh N, Steel AJ, Dooley J, Drinnan M, Hamilton D, Lloyd K, Oluboyede Y, Wilson C, Gardiner Q, Kara N, Khwaja S, Leong SC, Maini S, Morrison J, Nix P, Wilson JA, Teare MD. Clinical effectiveness of septoplasty versus medical management for nasal airways obstruction: multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2023; 383:e075445. [PMID: 37852641 PMCID: PMC10583133 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness of septoplasty. DESIGN Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. SETTING 17 otolaryngology clinics in the UK's National Health Service. PARTICIPANTS 378 adults (≥18 years, 67% men) newly referred with symptoms of nasal obstruction associated with septal deviation and at least moderate symptoms of nasal obstruction (score >30 on the Nasal Obstruction and Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale). INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive either septoplasty (n=188) or defined medical management (n=190, nasal steroid and saline spray for six months), stratified by baseline symptom severity and sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was patient reported score on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) at six months, with 9 points defined as the minimal clinically important difference. Secondary outcomes included quality of life and objective nasal airflow measures. RESULTS Mean SNOT-22 scores at six months were 19.9 (95% confidence interval 17.0 to 22.7) in the septoplasty arm (n=152, intention-to-treat population) and 39.5 (36.1 to 42.9) in the medical management arm (n=155); an estimated 20.0 points lower (better) for participants randomised to receive septoplasty (95% confidence interval 16.4 to 23.6, P<0.001, adjusted for baseline continuous SNOT-22 score and the stratification variables sex and baseline NOSE severity categories). Greater improvement in SNOT-22 scores was predicted by higher baseline symptom severity scores. Quality of life outcomes and nasal airflow measures (including peak nasal inspiratory flow and absolute inhalational nasal partitioning ratio) improved more in participants in the septoplasty group. Readmission to hospital with bleeding after septoplasty occurred in seven participants (4% of 174 who had septoplasty), and a further 20 participants (12%) required antibiotics for infections. CONCLUSIONS Septoplasty is a more effective intervention than a defined medical management regimen with a nasal steroid and saline spray in adults with nasal obstruction associated with a deviated nasal septum. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN16168569.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Carrie
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - James O'Hara
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tony Fouweather
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tara Homer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Bray
- Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Laura Ternent
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katherine Rennie
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emma Clark
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nichola Waugh
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alison J Steel
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jemima Dooley
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Drinnan
- Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Hamilton
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kelly Lloyd
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Yemi Oluboyede
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Caroline Wilson
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | | | - Naveed Kara
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
| | - Sadie Khwaja
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Manchester University Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Samuel C Leong
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sangeeta Maini
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jillian Morrison
- General Practice and primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul Nix
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Janet A Wilson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Dawn Teare
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilson JA, O'Hara J, Fouweather T, Homer T, Stocken DD, Vale L, Haighton C, Rousseau N, Wilson R, McSweeney L, Wilkes S, Morrison J, MacKenzie K, Ah-See K, Carrie S, Hopkins C, Howe N, Hussain M, Mehanna H, Raine C, Sullivan F, von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff A, Teare MD. Conservative management versus tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis in the UK (NATTINA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2023; 401:2051-2059. [PMID: 37209706 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00519-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tonsillectomy is regularly performed in adults with acute tonsillitis, but with scarce evidence. A reduction in tonsillectomies has coincided with an increase in acute adult hospitalisation for tonsillitis complications. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conservative management versus tonsillectomy in patients with recurrent acute tonsillitis. METHODS This pragmatic multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 27 hospitals in the UK. Participants were adults aged 16 years or older who were newly referred to secondary care otolaryngology clinics with recurrent acute tonsillitis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tonsillectomy or conservative management using random permuted blocks of variable length. Stratification by recruiting centre and baseline symptom severity was assessed using the Tonsil Outcome Inventory-14 score (categories defined as mild 0-35, moderate 36-48, or severe 49-70). Participants in the tonsillectomy group received elective surgery to dissect the palatine tonsils within 8 weeks after random assignment and those in the conservative management group received standard non-surgical care during 24 months. The primary outcome was the number of sore throat days collected during 24 months after random assignment, reported once per week with a text message. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, 55284102. FINDINGS Between May 11, 2015, and April 30, 2018, 4165 participants with recurrent acute tonsillitis were assessed for eligibility and 3712 were excluded. 453 eligible participants were randomly assigned (233 in the immediate tonsillectomy group vs 220 in the conservative management group). 429 (95%) patients were included in the primary ITT analysis (224 vs 205). The median age of participants was 23 years (IQR 19-30), with 355 (78%) females and 97 (21%) males. Most participants were White (407 [90%]). Participants in the immediate tonsillectomy group had fewer days of sore throat during 24 months than those in the conservative management group (median 23 days [IQR 11-46] vs 30 days [14-65]). After adjustment for site and baseline severity, the incident rate ratio of total sore throat days in the immediate tonsillectomy group (n=224) compared with the conservative management group (n=205) was 0·53 (95% CI 0·43 to 0·65; <0·0001). 191 adverse events in 90 (39%) of 231 participants were deemed related to tonsillectomy. The most common adverse event was bleeding (54 events in 44 [19%] participants). No deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION Compared with conservative management, immediate tonsillectomy is clinically effective and cost-effective in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet A Wilson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James O'Hara
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. james.o'
| | - Tony Fouweather
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tara Homer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Catherine Haighton
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Wilson
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lorraine McSweeney
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Scott Wilkes
- School of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | | | - Kenneth MacKenzie
- Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kim Ah-See
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sean Carrie
- Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department and Head and Neck Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicola Howe
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Hisham Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christopher Raine
- Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Frank Sullivan
- Population and Behavioural Science Division, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | | | - M Dawn Teare
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gale CP, Stocken DD, Aktaa S, Reynolds C, Gilberts R, Brieger D, Carruthers K, Chew DP, Goodman SG, Fernandez C, Sharples LD, Yan AT, Fox K. Effectiveness of GRACE risk score in patients admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (UKGRIS): parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2023; 381:e073843. [PMID: 37315959 PMCID: PMC10265221 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of risk stratification using the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score (GRS) for patients presenting to hospital with suspected non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN Parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING Patients presenting with suspected non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to 42 hospitals in England between 9 March 2017 and 30 December 2019. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged ≥18 years with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. INTERVENTION Hospitals were randomised (1:1) to patient management by standard care or according to the GRS and associated guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures were use of guideline recommended management and time to the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, new onset heart failure hospital admission, and readmission for cardiovascular event. Secondary measures included the duration of hospital stay, EQ-5D-5L (five domain, five level version of the EuroQoL index), and the composite endpoint components. RESULTS 3050 participants (1440 GRS, 1610 standard care) were recruited in 38 UK clusters (20 GRS, 18 standard care). The mean age was 65.7 years (standard deviation 12), 69% were male, and the mean baseline GRACE scores were 119.5 (standard deviation 31.4) and 125.7 (34.4) for GRS and standard care, respectively. The uptake of guideline recommended processes was 77.3% for GRS and 75.3% for standard care (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.92, P=0.56). The time to the first composite cardiac event was not significantly improved by the GRS (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.16, P=0.37). Baseline adjusted EQ-5D-5L utility at 12 months (difference -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.06 to 0.04) and the duration of hospital admission within 12 months (mean 11.2 days, standard deviation 18 days v 11.8 days, 19 days) were similar for GRS and standard care. CONCLUSIONS In adults presenting to hospital with suspected non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, the GRS did not improve adherence to guideline recommended management or reduce cardiovascular events at 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 29731761.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris P Gale
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Suleman Aktaa
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Reynolds
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Rachael Gilberts
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK
| | - David Brieger
- Cardiology Department, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathryn Carruthers
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Derek P Chew
- College of Medicine and Public Health of Medicine, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Shaun G Goodman
- Canadian VIGOUR Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Linda D Sharples
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andrew T Yan
- St Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Keith Fox
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ajjan RA, Heller SR, Everett CC, Vargas-Palacios A, Higham R, Sharples L, Gorog DA, Rogers A, Reynolds C, Fernandez C, Rodrigues P, Sathyapalan T, Storey RF, Stocken DD. Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial. Diabetes Care 2023; 46:441-449. [PMID: 36516054 PMCID: PMC9887626 DOI: 10.2337/dc22-1219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the impact of modern glucose-monitoring strategies on glycemic and patient-related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) and assess cost effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS LIBERATES was a multicenter two-arm randomized trial comparing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM), also known as flash CGM, in individuals with T2D and recent MI, treated with insulin and/or a sulphonylurea before hospital admission. The primary outcome measure was time in range (TIR) (glucose 3.9-10 mmol/L/day) on days 76-90 post-randomization. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included time in hypoglycemia, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), clinical outcome, quality of life (QOL), and cost effectiveness. RESULTS Of 141 participants randomly assigned (median age 63 years; interquartile range 53, 70), 73% of whom were men, isCGM was associated with increased TIR by 17 min/day (95% credible interval -105 to +153 min/day), with 59% probability of benefit. Users of isCGM showed lower hypoglycemic exposure (<3.9 mmol/L) at days 76-90 (-80 min/day; 95% CI -118, -43), also evident at days 16-30 (-28 min/day; 95% CI -92, 2). Compared with baseline, HbA1c showed similar reductions of 7 mmol/mol at 3 months in both study arms. Combined glycemic emergencies and mortality occurred in four isCGM and seven SMBG study participants. QOL measures marginally favored isCGM, and the intervention proved to be cost effective. CONCLUSIONS Compared with SMBG, isCGM in T2D individuals with MI marginally increases TIR and significantly reduces hypoglycemic exposure while equally improving HbA1c, explaining its cost effectiveness. Studies are required to understand whether these glycemic differences translate into longer-term clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi A. Ajjan
- Clinical Population and Sciences Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
- Corresponding author: Ramzi A. Ajjan,
| | - Simon R. Heller
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Colin C. Everett
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
| | | | - Ruchi Higham
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Linda Sharples
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, U.K
| | - Diana A. Gorog
- School of Life and Medical Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, U.K
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, U.K
| | | | - Catherine Reynolds
- Clinical Population and Sciences Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
| | - Catherine Fernandez
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Pedro Rodrigues
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
| | - Thozhukat Sathyapalan
- Academic Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Allam Diabetes Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, U.K
| | - Robert F. Storey
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Deborah D. Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Coxon-Meggy AH, Vogel I, White J, Croft J, Corrigan N, Meggy A, Stocken DD, Keller D, Hompes R, Knowles CH, Quyn A, Cornish J. Pathway Of Low Anterior Resection syndrome relief after Surgery (POLARiS) feasibility trial protocol: a multicentre, feasibility cohort study with embedded randomised control trial to compare sacral neuromodulation and transanal irrigation to optimised conservative management in the management of major low anterior resection syndrome following rectal cancer treatment. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064248. [PMID: 36627161 PMCID: PMC9835955 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rectal cancer is common with a 60% 5-year survival rate. Treatment usually involves surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy. Sphincter saving curative treatment can result in debilitating changes to bowel function known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). There are currently no clear guidelines on the management of LARS with only limited evidence for different treatment modalities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Patients who have undergone an anterior resection for rectal cancer in the last 10 years will be approached for the study. The feasibility trial will take place in four centres with a 9-month recruitment window and 12 months follow-up period. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of recruitment to the POLARiS trial which will be achieved through assessment of recruitment, retainment and follow-up rates as well as the prevalence of major LARS.Feasibility outcomes will be analysed descriptively through the estimation of proportions with confidence intervals. Longitudinal patient reported outcome measures will be analysed according to scoring manuals and presented descriptively with reporting graphically over time. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted by Wales REC1; Reference 22/WA/0025. The feasibility study is in the process of set up. The results of the feasibility trial will feed into the design of an expanded, international trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CT05319054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Harriet Coxon-Meggy
- Colorectal Surgery, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Irene Vogel
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Judith White
- Cedar, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Julie Croft
- University of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Neil Corrigan
- University of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Alun Meggy
- Research and Development, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- University of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Deborah Keller
- Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
| | | | - Aaron Quyn
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- University of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Julie Cornish
- Colorectal Surgery, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nugent M, Bryant V, Butcher C, Fisher H, Gill S, Goranova R, Hiu S, Lindley L, O'Hara J, Oluboyede Y, Patterson J, Rapley T, Robinson T, Rousseau N, Ryan V, Shanmugasundaram R, Sharp L, Smith Whelan R, Stocken DD, Ternent L, Wilson J, Walker J. Photobiomodulation in the management of oral mucositis for adult head and neck cancer patients receiving irradiation: the LiTEFORM RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-172. [PMID: 36484364 PMCID: PMC9761526 DOI: 10.3310/uwnb3375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral mucositis is a debilitating and painful complication of head and neck cancer irradiation that is characterised by inflammation of the mucous membranes, erythema and ulceration. Oral mucositis affects 6000 head and neck cancer patients per year in England and Wales. Current treatments have not proven to be effective. International studies suggest that low-level laser therapy may be an effective treatment. OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in the management of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer irradiation. To identify barriers to and facilitators of implementing low-level laser therapy in routine care. DESIGN Placebo-controlled, individually randomised, multicentre Phase III superiority trial, with an internal pilot and health economic and qualitative process evaluations. The participants, outcome assessors and therapists were blinded. SETTING Nine NHS head and neck cancer sites in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS A total of 87 out of 380 participants were recruited who were aged ≥ 18 years and were undergoing head and neck cancer irradiation with ≥ 60 Gy. INTERVENTION Random allocation (1 : 1 ratio) to either low-level laser therapy or sham low-level laser therapy three times per week for the duration of irradiation. The diode laser had the following specifications: wavelength 660 nm, power output 75 mW, beam area 1.5 cm2, irradiance 50 mW/cm2, exposure time 60 seconds and fluence 3 J/cm2. There were 20-30 spots per session. Sham low-level laser therapy was delivered in an identical manner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The mean Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer score at 6 weeks following the start of irradiation. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. RESULTS A total of 231 patients were screened and, of these, 87 were randomised (low-level laser therapy arm, n = 44; sham arm, n = 43). The mean age was 59.4 years (standard deviation 8.8 years) and 69 participants (79%) were male. The mean Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer score at 6 weeks was 33.2 (standard deviation 10) in the low-level laser therapy arm and 27.4 (standard deviation 13.8) in the sham arm. LIMITATIONS The trial lacked statistical power because it did not meet the recruitment target. Staff and patients willingly participated in the trial and worked hard to make the LiTEFORM trial succeed. However, the task of introducing, embedding and sustaining new low-level laser therapy services into a complex care pathway proved challenging. Sites could deliver low-level laser therapy to only a small number of patients at a time. The administration of low-level laser therapy was viewed as straightforward, but also time-consuming and sometimes uncomfortable for both patients and staff, particularly those staff who were not used to working in a patient's mouth. CONCLUSIONS This trial had a robust design but lacked power to be definitive. Low-level laser therapy is relatively inexpensive. In contrast with previous trials, some patients found low-level laser therapy sessions to be difficult. The duration of low-level laser therapy sessions is, therefore, an important consideration. Clinicians experienced in oral cavity work most readily adapt to delivering low-level laser therapy, although other allied health professionals can be trained. Blinding the clinicians delivering low-level laser therapy is feasible. There are important human resource, real estate and logistical considerations for those setting up low-level laser therapy services. FUTURE WORK Further well-designed randomised controlled trials investigating low-level laser therapy in head and neck cancer irradiation are needed, with similar powered recruitment targets but addressing the recruitment challenges and logistical findings from this research. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN14224600. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 46. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
|
11
|
Tassinari CJ, Higham R, Smith IL, Arnold S, Mujica-Mota R, Metcalfe A, Simpson H, Murray D, McGonagle DG, Sharma H, Hamilton TW, Ellard DR, Fernandez C, Reynolds C, Harwood P, Croft J, Stocken DD, Pandit H. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062721. [PMID: 35772819 PMCID: PMC9247693 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knee replacement (KR) is a clinically proven procedure typically offered to patients with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA) to relieve pain and improve quality of life. However, artificial joints fail over time, requiring revision associated with higher mortality and inferior outcomes. With more young people presenting with knee OA and increasing life expectancy, there is an unmet need to postpone time to first KR. Knee joint distraction (KJD), the practice of using external fixators to open up knee joint space, is proposed as potentially effective to preserve the joint following initial studies in the Netherlands, however, has not been researched within an NHS setting. The KARDS trial will investigate whether KJD is non-inferior to KR in terms of patient-reported postoperative pain 12 months post-surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS KARDS is a phase III, multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing KJD with KR in patients with severe knee OA, employing a hybrid-expertise design, with internal pilot phase and process evaluation. 344 participants will be randomised (1:1) to KJD or KR. The primary outcome measure is the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) pain domain score at 12 months post-operation. Secondary outcome measures include patient-reported overall KOOS, Pain Visual Analogue Scale and Oxford Knee Scores, knee function assessments, joint space width, complications and further interventions over 24 months post-operation. Per patient cost difference between KR and KJD and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over 24 months will be estimated within trial, and incremental cost per QALY gained over 20 years by KJD relative to KR predicted using decision analytic modelling. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Research Authority (HRA). Trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences, through relevant patient groups and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN14879004; recruitment opened April 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cerys Joyce Tassinari
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ruchi Higham
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Isabelle Louise Smith
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Susanne Arnold
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Andrew Metcalfe
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Hamish Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Murray
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Dennis G McGonagle
- Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Hemant Sharma
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Thomas William Hamilton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - David R Ellard
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | - Catherine Fernandez
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Reynolds
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Harwood
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Julie Croft
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hemant Pandit
- Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
- Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hammond CJ, Stocken DD. Comment on: Future of surgical registries. Br J Surg 2021; 109:e59. [PMID: 34928366 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chapman SJ, Naylor M, Czoski Murray CJ, Tolan D, Stocken DD, Jayne DG. Non-invasive, vagus nerve stimulation to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery: protocol for a feasibility trial with nested mechanistic studies. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046313. [PMID: 34290065 PMCID: PMC8296772 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ileus is a common and distressing condition characterised by gut dysfunction after surgery. While a number of interventions have aimed to curtail its impact on patients and healthcare systems, ileus is still an unmet challenge. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve is a promising new treatment due to its role in modulating the neuro-immune axis through a novel anti-inflammatory reflex. The protocol for a feasibility study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), and a programme of mechanistic and qualitative studies, is described. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a participant-blinded, parallel-group, randomised, sham-controlled feasibility trial (IDEAL Stage 2b) of self-administered nVNS. One hundred forty patients planned for elective, minimally invasive, colorectal surgery will be randomised to four schedules of nVNS before and after surgery. Feasibility outcomes include assessments of recruitment and attrition, adequacy of blinding and compliance to the intervention. Clinical outcomes include bowel function and length of hospital stay. A series of mechanistic substudies exploring the impact of nVNS on inflammation and bowel motility will inform the design of the final stimulation schedule. Semistructured interviews with participants will explore experiences and perceptions of the intervention, while interviews with patients who decline participation will explore barriers to recruitment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol has been approved by the Tyne and Wear South National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee (19/NE/0217) on 2 July 2019. Feasibility, mechanistic and qualitative findings will be disseminated to national and international partners through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, social media channels and stakeholder engagement activities. The findings will build a case for or against progression to a definitive randomised assessment as well as informing key elements of study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN62033341.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Maureen Naylor
- West Riding of Yorkshire Ileostomy Association, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David G Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cole M, Yap C, Buckley C, Ng WF, McInnes I, Filer A, Siebert S, Pratt A, Isaacs JD, Stocken DD. TRAFIC: statistical design and analysis plan for a pragmatic early phase 1/2 Bayesian adaptive dose escalation trial in rheumatoid arthritis. Trials 2021; 22:433. [PMID: 34229728 PMCID: PMC8259060 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05384-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adaptive model-based dose-finding designs have demonstrated advantages over traditional rule-based designs but have increased statistical complexity but uptake has been slow especially outside of cancer trials. TRAFIC is a multi-centre, early phase trial in rheumatoid arthritis incorporating a model-based design. Methods A Bayesian adaptive dose-finding phase I trial rolling into a single-arm, single-stage phase II trial. Model parameters for phase I were chosen via Monte Carlo simulation evaluating objective performance measures under clinically relevant scenarios and incorporated stopping rules for early termination. Potential designs were further calibrated utilising dose transition pathways. Discussion TRAFIC is an MRC-funded trial of a re-purposed treatment demonstrating that it is possible to design, fund and implement a model-based phase I trial in a non-cancer population within conventional research funding tracks and regulatory constraints. The phase I design allows borrowing of information from previous trials, all accumulated data to be utilised in decision-making, verification of operating characteristics through simulation, improved understanding for management and oversight teams through dose transition pathways. The rolling phase II design brings efficiencies in trial conduct including site and monitoring activities and cost. TRAFIC is the first funded model-based dose-finding trial in inflammatory disease demonstrating that small phase I/II trials can have an underlying statistical basis for decision-making and interpretation. Trial registration Trials Registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN36667085. Registered on September 26, 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Cole
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - C Yap
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, Sutton, UK
| | - C Buckley
- School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - W F Ng
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - I McInnes
- College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Filer
- School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Siebert
- College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Pratt
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J D Isaacs
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - D D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pratt AG, Siebert S, Cole M, Stocken DD, Yap C, Kelly S, Shaikh M, Cranston A, Morton M, Walker J, Frame S, Ng WF, Buckley CD, McInnes IB, Filer A, Isaacs JD. Targeting synovial fibroblast proliferation in rheumatoid arthritis (TRAFIC): an open-label, dose-finding, phase 1b trial. Lancet Rheumatol 2021; 3:e337-e346. [PMID: 33928262 PMCID: PMC8062952 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00061-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background Current rheumatoid arthritis therapies target immune inflammation and are subject to ceiling effects. Seliciclib is an orally available cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that suppresses proliferation of synovial fibroblasts—cells not yet targeted in rheumatoid arthritis. Part 1 of this phase 1b/2a trial aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose of seliciclib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite ongoing treatment with TNF inhibitors, and to evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics. Methods Phase 1b of the TRAFIC study was a non-randomised, open-label, dose-finding trial done in rheumatology departments in five UK National Health Service hospitals. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or the 2010 ACR–European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and had moderate to severe disease activity (a Disease Activity Score for 28 joints [DAS28] of ≥3·2) despite stable treatment with anti-TNF therapy for at least 3 months before enrolment. Participants were recruited sequentially to a maximum of seven cohorts of three participants each, designated to receive seliciclib 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg, or 1000 mg administered in 200 mg oral capsules. Sequential cohorts received doses determined by a restricted, one-stage Bayesian continual reassessment model, which determined the maximum tolerated dose (the primary outcome) based on a target dose-limiting toxicity rate of 35%. Seliciclib maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration time curve 0–6 h (AUC0–6) were measured. This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN36667085. Findings Between Oct 8, 2015, and Aug 15, 2017, 37 patients were screened and 15 were enrolled to five cohorts and received seliciclib, after which the trial steering committee and the data monitoring committee determined that the maximum tolerated dose could be defined. In addition to a TNF inhibitor, ten (67%) enrolled patients were taking conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. The maximum tolerated dose of seliciclib was 400 mg, with an estimated dose-limiting toxicity probability of 0·35 (90% posterior probability interval 0·18–0·52). Two serious adverse events occurred (one acute kidney injury in a patient receiving the 600 mg dose and one drug-induced liver injury in a patient receiving the 400 mg dose), both considered to be related to seliciclib and consistent with its known safety profile. 65 non-serious adverse events occurred during the trial, 50 of which were considered to be treatment related. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild; 20 of the treatment-related non-serious adverse events contributed to dose-limiting toxicities. There were no deaths. Average Cmax and AUC0–6 were two-times higher in participants developing dose-limiting toxicities. Interpretation The maximum tolerated dose of seliciclib has been defined for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to TNF blockade. No unexpected safety concerns were identified to preclude ongoing clinical evaluation in a formal efficacy trial. Funding UK Medical Research Council, Cyclacel, Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre (Versus Arthritis), and the National Institute of Health Research Newcastle and Birmingham Biomedical Research Centres and Clinical Research Facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur G Pratt
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stefan Siebert
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael Cole
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christina Yap
- Clinical Trial and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stephen Kelly
- Department of Rheumatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Muddassir Shaikh
- Department of Rheumatology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Amy Cranston
- Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Miranda Morton
- Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jenn Walker
- Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Wan-Fai Ng
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Christopher D Buckley
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Filer
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John D Isaacs
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
O'Hara J, Stocken DD, Watson GC, Fouweather T, McGlashan J, MacKenzie K, Carding P, Karagama Y, Wood R, Wilson JA. Use of proton pump inhibitors to treat persistent throat symptoms: multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2021; 372:m4903. [PMID: 33414239 PMCID: PMC7789994 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to treat persistent throat symptoms. DESIGN Pragmatic, double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. SETTING Eight ear, nose, and throat outpatient clinics, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS 346 patients aged 18 years or older with persistent throat symptoms who were randomised according to recruiting centre and baseline severity of symptoms (mild or severe): 172 to lansoprazole and 174 to placebo. INTERVENTION Random blinded allocation (1:1) to either 30 mg lansoprazole twice daily or matched placebo twice daily for 16 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was symptomatic response at 16 weeks measured using the total reflux symptom index (RSI) score. Secondary outcomes included symptom response at 12 months, quality of life, and throat appearances. RESULTS Of 1427 patients initially screened for eligibility, 346 were recruited. The mean age of the study sample was 52.2 (SD 13.7) years, 196 (57%) were women, and 162 (47%) had severe symptoms at presentation; these characteristics were balanced across treatment arms. The primary analysis was performed on 220 patients who completed the primary outcome measure within a window of 14-20 weeks. Mean RSI scores were similar between treatment arms at baseline: lansoprazole 22.0 (95% confidence interval 20.4 to 23.6) and placebo 21.7 (20.5 to 23.0). Improvements (reduction in RSI score) were observed in both groups-score at 16 weeks: lansoprazole 17.4 (15.5 to19.4) and placebo 15.6 (13.8 to 17.3). No statistically significant difference was found between the treatment arms: estimated difference 1.9 points (95% confidence interval -0.3 to 4.2 points; P=0.096) adjusted for site and baseline symptom severity. Lansoprazole showed no benefits over placebo for any secondary outcome measure, including RSI scores at 12 months: lansoprazole 16.0 (13.6 to 18.4) and placebo 13.6 (11.7 to 15.5): estimated difference 2.4 points (-0.6 to 5.4 points). CONCLUSIONS No evidence was found of benefit from PPI treatment in patients with persistent throat symptoms. RSI scores were similar between the lansoprazole and placebo groups after 16 weeks of treatment and at the 12 month follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN38578686 and EudraCT 2013-004249-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James O'Hara
- Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK James.O'
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Clinical Trials Research, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gillian C Watson
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Tony Fouweather
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Kenneth MacKenzie
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. Visiting Professor, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul Carding
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ruth Wood
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Janet A Wilson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wilson JA, Stocken DD, Watson GC, Fouweather T, McGlashan J, MacKenzie K, Carding P, Karagama Y, Harries M, Ball S, Khwaja S, Costello D, Wood R, Lecouturier J, O'Hara J. Lansoprazole for persistent throat symptoms in secondary care: the TOPPITS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-118. [PMID: 33492208 PMCID: PMC7869007 DOI: 10.3310/hta25030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent throat symptoms are commonly attributed to 'laryngopharyngeal reflux'. Despite a limited evidence base, these symptoms are increasingly being treated in primary care with proton pump inhibitors. OBJECTIVE To assess the value of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with persistent throat symptoms. DESIGN This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised Phase III trial. SETTING This was a multicentre UK trial in eight UK ear, nose and throat departments. PARTICIPANTS A total of 346 participants aged ≥ 18 years with persistent throat symptoms and a Reflux Symptom Index score of ≥ 10, exclusive of the dyspepsia item, were recruited. INTERVENTION Random allocation (1 : 1 ratio) to either 30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily or matched placebo for 16 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Symptomatic response (i.e. total Reflux Symptom Index score after 16 weeks of therapy). RESULTS A total of 1427 patients were screened and 346 were randomised. The mean age was 52 years (standard deviation 13.7 years, range 20-84 years); 150 (43%) participants were male and 196 (57%) were female; 184 (53%) participants had a mild Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item and 162 (47%) had a severe Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item. A total of 172 patients were randomised to lansoprazole and 174 were randomised to placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES A total of 267 participants completed the primary end-point visit (lansoprazole, n = 127; placebo, n = 140), of whom 220 did so between 14 and 20 weeks post randomisation ('compliant' group); 102 received lansoprazole and 118 received placebo. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores at baseline were similar [lansoprazole 22.0 (standard deviation 8.0), placebo 21.7 (standard deviation 7.1), overall 21.9 (standard deviation 7.5)]. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores at 16 weeks reduced from baseline in both groups [overall 17.4 (standard deviation 9.9), lansoprazole 17.4 (standard deviation 9.9), placebo 15.6 (standard deviation 9.8)]. Lansoprazole participants had estimated Reflux Symptom Index scores at 16 weeks that were 1.9 points higher (worse) than those of placebo participants (95% confidence interval -0.3 to 4.2; padj = 0.096), adjusted for site and baseline severity. SECONDARY OUTCOMES Ninety-five (43%) participants achieved a Reflux Symptom Index score in the normal range (< 12) at 16 weeks: 42 (41%) in the lansoprazole group and 53 (45%) in the placebo group. A total of 226 participants completed the end-of-trial follow-up visit (lansoprazole, n = 109; placebo, n = 117), of whom 181 were 'compliant'. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores at 12 months reduced from baseline in both groups [lansoprazole 16.0 (standard deviation 10.8), placebo 13.6 (standard deviation 9.6), overall 14.7 (standard deviation 10.2)]. A total of 87 (48%) participants achieved a Reflux Symptom Index score in the normal range at 12 months: 33 (40%) in the lansoprazole group and 54 (55%) in the placebo group. Likewise, the Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - Health Related Quality of Life total scores and subscales all showed very similar changes in the lansoprazole and placebo cohorts at both 16 weeks and 12 months. LIMITATIONS Drop-out rate and compliance are issues in pragmatic clinical trials. The Trial Of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Throat Symptoms (TOPPITS) aimed to detect clinically relevant difference with 90% power. The 346 randomised participants reduced to 283 at the primary end point; 267 completed the primary outcome measure, 220 within the protocol time scale. Despite this, the powers to detect the clinically relevant difference in Reflux Symptom Index score at 16 weeks were 82% (compliant comparison) and 89% (pragmatic comparison). The lack of difference between lansoprazole and placebo is generalisable across NHS clinics. CONCLUSIONS Participants on lansoprazole did not report significantly better outcomes than participants on placebo on any of the three patient-reported outcome tools (Reflux Symptom Index, Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - Health Related Quality of Life). This multicentre, pragmatic, powered, definitive Phase III trial found no evidence of benefit for patients by treating persistent throat symptoms with lansoprazole. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN38578686 and EudraCT number 2013-004249-17. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet A Wilson
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gillian C Watson
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tony Fouweather
- Biostatistics Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julian McGlashan
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kenneth MacKenzie
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul Carding
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Yakubu Karagama
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Meredydd Harries
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Stephen Ball
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Sadie Khwaja
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, UK
| | - Declan Costello
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruth Wood
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jan Lecouturier
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James O'Hara
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gierula J, Lowry JE, Paton MF, Cole CA, Byrom R, Koshy AA, Chumun H, Kearney LC, Straw S, Bowen TS, Cubbon RM, Keenan AM, Stocken DD, Kearney MT, Witte KK. Response by Gierula et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Personalized Rate-Response Programming Improves Exercise Tolerance After 6 Months in People With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Heart Failure: A Phase II Study". Circulation 2020; 142:e319-e320. [PMID: 33166218 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.050610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John Gierula
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Judith E Lowry
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria F Paton
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte A Cole
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rowenna Byrom
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron A Koshy
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Hemant Chumun
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine C Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Straw
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - T Scott Bowen
- Leeds Faculty of Biological Sciences (T.S.B.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M Cubbon
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- Leeds School of Healthcare (A.- M.K.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (D.D.S.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Klaus K Witte
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jabbar A, Ingoe L, Junejo S, Carey P, Addison C, Thomas H, Parikh JD, Austin D, Hollingsworth KG, Stocken DD, Pearce SHS, Greenwood JP, Zaman A, Razvi S. Effect of Levothyroxine on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 324:249-258. [PMID: 32692386 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.9389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Thyroid hormones play a key role in modulating myocardial contractility. Subclinical hypothyroidism in patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with poor prognosis. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of levothyroxine treatment on left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction and subclinical hypothyroidism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in 6 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Patients with acute myocardial infarction including ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation were recruited between February 2015 and December 2016, with the last participant being followed up in December 2017. INTERVENTIONS Levothyroxine treatment (n = 46) commencing at 25 µg titrated to aim for serum thyrotropin levels between 0.4 and 2.5 mU/L or identical placebo (n = 49), both provided in capsule form, once daily for 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was left ventricular ejection fraction at 52 weeks, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, adjusted for age, sex, type of acute myocardial infarction, affected coronary artery territory, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction. Secondary measures were left ventricular volumes, infarct size (assessed in a subgroup [n = 60]), adverse events, and patient-reported outcome measures of health status, health-related quality of life, and depression. RESULTS Among the 95 participants randomized, the mean (SD) age was 63.5 (9.5) years, 72 (76.6%) were men, and 65 (69.1%) had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The median serum thyrotropin level was 5.7 mU/L (interquartile range, 4.8-7.3 mU/L) and the mean (SD) free thyroxine level was 1.14 (0.16) ng/dL. The primary outcome measurements at 52 weeks were available in 85 patients (89.5%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline and at 52 weeks was 51.3% and 53.8%, respectively, in the levothyroxine group compared with 54.0% and 56.1%, respectively, in the placebo group (adjusted difference in groups, 0.76% [95% CI, -0.93% to 2.46%]; P = .37). None of the 6 secondary outcomes showed a significant difference between the levothyroxine and placebo treatment groups. There were 15 (33.3%) and 18 (36.7%) cardiovascular adverse events in the levothyroxine and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this preliminary study involving patients with subclinical hypothyroidism and acute myocardial infarction, treatment with levothyroxine, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve left ventricular ejection fraction after 52 weeks. These findings do not support treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism in patients with acute myocardial infarction. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN52505169.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avais Jabbar
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Lorna Ingoe
- Department of Cardiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Endocrinology, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, United Kingdom
| | - Shahid Junejo
- Department of Endocrinology and Cardiology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Carey
- Department of Endocrinology and Cardiology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Addison
- Department of Endocrinology, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, United Kingdom
| | - Honey Thomas
- Department of Cardiology, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Cramlington, United Kingdom
| | - Jehill D Parikh
- Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - David Austin
- Department of Cardiology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Kieren G Hollingsworth
- Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Simon H S Pearce
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - John P Greenwood
- Leeds University and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Azfar Zaman
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Salman Razvi
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Endocrinology, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Siebert S, Pratt AG, Stocken DD, Morton M, Cranston A, Cole M, Frame S, Buckley CD, Ng WF, Filer A, McInnes IB, Isaacs JD. Targeting the rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblast via cyclin dependent kinase inhibition: An early phase trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20458. [PMID: 32590730 PMCID: PMC7328978 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Targeted biologic therapies demonstrate similar efficacies in rheumatoid arthritis despite distinct mechanisms of action. They also exhibit a ceiling effect, with 10% to 20% of patients achieving remission in clinical trials. None of these therapies target synovial fibroblasts, which drive and maintain synovitis. Seliciclib (R-roscovitine) is an orally available cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that suppresses fibroblast proliferation, and is efficacious in preclinical arthritis models. We aim to determine the toxicity and preliminary efficacy of seliciclib in combination with biologic therapies, to inform its potential as an adjunctive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS TRAFIC is a non-commercial, multi-center, rolling phase Ib/IIa trial investigating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of seliciclib in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis receiving biologic therapies. All participants receive seliciclib with no control arm. The primary objective of part 1 (phase Ib) is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and safety of seliciclib over 4 weeks of dosing. Part 1 uses a restricted 1-stage Bayesian continual reassessment method based on a target dose-limiting toxicity probability of 35%. Part 2 (phase IIa) assesses the potential efficacy of seliciclib, and is designed as a single arm, single stage early phase trial based on a Fleming-A'Hern design using the maximum tolerated dose recommended from part 1. The primary response outcome after 12 weeks of therapy is a composite of clinical, histological and magnetic resonance imaging scores. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters, autoantibodies, and fatigue. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been reviewed and approved by the North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee (reference 14/NE/1075) and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), United Kingdom. Results will be disseminated through publication in relevant peer-reviewed journals and presentation at national and international conferences. TRIALS REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN36667085. Registered on September 26, 2014; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN36667085Current protocol version: Protocol version 11.0 (March 21, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Siebert
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - Arthur G. Pratt
- Translational and Experimental Medicine Institute, Newcastle University and Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | | | - Miranda Morton
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - Amy Cranston
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - Michael Cole
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | | | - Christopher D. Buckley
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
- Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Roosevelt Drive, Headington University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Wan-Fai Ng
- Translational and Experimental Medicine Institute, Newcastle University and Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - Andrew Filer
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - Iain B. McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - John D. Isaacs
- Translational and Experimental Medicine Institute, Newcastle University and Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gierula J, Lowry JE, Paton MF, Cole CA, Byrom R, Koshy AO, Chumun H, Kearney LC, Straw S, Bowen TS, Cubbon RM, Keenan AM, Stocken DD, Kearney MT, Witte KK. Personalized Rate-Response Programming Improves Exercise Tolerance After 6 Months in People With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Heart Failure. Circulation 2020; 141:1693-1703. [DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.045066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background:
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is characterized by blunting of the positive relationship between heart rate and left ventricular (LV) contractility known as the force-frequency relationship (FFR). We have previously described that tailoring the rate-response programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with HFrEF on the basis of individual noninvasive FFR data acutely improves exercise capacity. We aimed to examine whether using FFR data to tailor heart rate response in patients with HFrEF with cardiac implantable electronic devices favorably influences exercise capacity and LV function 6 months later.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial in patients with stable symptomatic HFrEF taking optimal guideline-directed medical therapy and with a cardiac implantable electronic device (cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator). Participants were randomized on a 1:1 basis between tailored rate-response programming on the basis of individual FFR data and conventional age-guided rate-response programming. The primary outcome measure was change in walk time on a treadmill walk test. Secondary outcomes included changes in LV systolic function, peak oxygen consumption, and quality of life.
Results:
We randomized 83 patients with a mean±SD age 74.6±8.7 years and LV ejection fraction 35.2±10.5. Mean change in exercise time at 6 months was 75.4 (95% CI, 23.4 to 127.5) seconds for FFR-guided rate-adaptive pacing and 3.1 (95% CI, −44.1 to 50.3) seconds for conventional settings (analysis of covariance;
P
=0.044 between groups) despite lower peak mean±SD heart rates (98.6±19.4 versus 112.0±20.3 beats per minute). FFR-guided heart rate settings had no adverse effect on LV structure or function, whereas conventional settings were associated with a reduction in LV ejection fraction.
Conclusions:
In this phase II study, FFR-guided rate-response programming determined using a reproducible, noninvasive method appears to improve exercise time and limit changes to LV function in people with HFrEF and cardiac implantable electronic devices. Work is ongoing to confirm our findings in a multicenter setting and on longer-term clinical outcomes.
Registration:
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT02964650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gierula
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Judith E. Lowry
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria F. Paton
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte A. Cole
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rowenna Byrom
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron O. Koshy
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Hemant Chumun
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine C. Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Straw
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - T. Scott Bowen
- Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Medicine (T.S.B.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M. Cubbon
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Deborah D. Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (D.D.S), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T. Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Klaus K. Witte
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Everett CC, Reynolds C, Fernandez C, Stocken DD, Sharples LD, Sathyapalan T, Heller S, Storey RF, Ajjan RA. Rationale and design of the LIBERATES trial: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of flash glucose monitoring for optimisation of glycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes and recent myocardial infarction. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2020; 17:1479164120957934. [PMID: 33081502 PMCID: PMC7919208 DOI: 10.1177/1479164120957934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hyperglycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with guarded clinical prognosis. Studies improving glucose levels in T2D following MI relied on HbA1c as the main glycaemic marker, failing to address potential adverse effects of hypoglycaemia and glucose variability. We describe the design of the LIBERATES trial that investigates the role of flash glucose monitoring in optimising glycaemic markers in high vascular risk individuals with T2D. This multicentre trial is designed to recruit up to 150 insulin and/or sulphonylurea-treated T2D patients, within 5 days of a proven MI. Individuals will be randomised 1:1 into intervention and control groups using flash glucose monitoring sensors and traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose, respectively. The control group will also wear a blinded continuous glucose monitoring sensor. The primary outcome is the difference in time spent in euglycaemia (defined as glucose levels between 3.9-10.0 mmol/l), comparing study groups 3 months following recruitment, assessed daily for 14 days and as an average. Secondary and exploratory end points include time spent in hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, HbA1c, quality of life measures, major adverse cardiac events and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. This study will establish the role of flash glucose monitoring in glycaemic management of individuals with T2D sustaining a cardiac event.(Trial Registration: ISRCTN14974233, registered 12th June 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin C Everett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Catherine Reynolds
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Catherine Fernandez
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Linda D Sharples
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, Bloomsbury, London, UK
| | | | - Simon Heller
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Robert F Storey
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Ramzi A Ajjan
- Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocirnology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
- Ramzi A Ajjan, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, The LIGHT Laboratories, Clarendon Way, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Danilenko M, Stamp E, Stocken DD, Husain A, Zangarini M, Cranston A, Stones R, Sinclair N, Hodgson K, Bowett SA, Roblin D, Traversa S, Plummer R, Veal G, Langtry JAA, Ashworth A, Burn J, Rajan N. Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol 2019; 154:913-921. [PMID: 29955768 PMCID: PMC6128505 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Question Can targeting tropomyosin receptor kinase with an existing topical kinase inhibitor, pegcantratinib, 0.5% (wt/wt), reduce cutaneous cylindroma tumor volume more than placebo? Findings In this phase 2 clinical trial that included 150 tumors from 15 patients with CYLD cutaneous syndrome, pegcantratinib-treated tumors did not achieve the primary outcome of response. Molecular analyses of biopsy material demonstrated drug penetration; however, drug concentrations achieved were inadequate to abrogate tropomyosin receptor kinase signaling in CYLD cutaneous syndrome tumors. Meaning These findings indicate that further studies should examine dose-escalation of pegcantratinib in these patients. Importance There are no medical interventions for the orphan disease CYLD cutaneous syndrome (CCS). Transcriptomic profiling of CCS skin tumors previously highlighted tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs) as candidate therapeutic targets. Objective To investigate if topical targeting of TRK with an existing topical TRK inhibitor, pegcantratinib, 0.5% (wt/wt), is safe and efficacious in CCS. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 1b open-label safety study, followed by a phase 2a within-patient randomized (by tumor), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (the Tropomyosin Receptor Antagonism in Cylindromatosis [TRAC] trial). The setting was a single-center trial based at a tertiary dermatogenetics referral center for CCS (Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom). Patients who had germline mutations in CYLD or who satisfied clinical diagnostic criteria for CCS were recruited between March 1, 2015, and July 1, 2016. Interventions In phase 1b, patients with CCS applied pegcantratinib for 4 weeks to a single skin tumor. In phase 2a, allocation of tumors was to either receive active treatment on the right side and placebo on the left side (arm A) or active treatment on the left side and placebo on the right side (arm B). Patients were eligible if they had 10 small skin tumors, with 5 matched lesions on each body side; patients were randomized to receive active treatment (pegcantratinib) to one body side and placebo to the other side once daily for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measure was the number of tumors meeting the criteria for response in a prespecified critical number of pegcantratinib-treated tumors. Secondary clinical outcome measures included an assessment for safety of application, pain in early tumors, and compliance with the trial protocol. Results In phase 1b, 8 female patients with a median age of 60 years (age range, 41-80 years) were recruited and completed the study. None of the participants experienced any adverse treatment site reactions. Three patients reported reduced pain in treated tumors. In phase 2a (15 patients [13 female; median age, 51 years], with 150 tumors), 2 tumors treated with pegcantratinib achieved the primary outcome measure of response compared with 6 tumors treated with placebo. The primary prespecified number of responses was not met. The incidence of adverse events was low. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, pegcantratinib, 0.5% (wt/wt), applied once daily appeared to be well tolerated and to penetrate the tumor tissue; however, the low tumor drug concentrations demonstrated are likely to account for the lack of response. Dose-escalation studies to assess the maximal tolerated dose may be beneficial in future studies of CCS. Trial Registration isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN75715723
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Danilenko
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine Stamp
- Biostatistics Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Biostatistics Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Akhtar Husain
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Monique Zangarini
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Cranston
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Stones
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Sinclair
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsty Hodgson
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Susan A Bowett
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - David Roblin
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ruth Plummer
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Veal
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - James A A Langtry
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Ashworth
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - John Burn
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Rajan
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Everett CC, Fox KA, Reynolds C, Fernandez C, Sharples L, Stocken DD, Carruthers K, Hemingway H, Yan AT, Goodman SG, Brieger D, Chew DP, Gale CP. Evaluation of the impact of the GRACE risk score on the management and outcome of patients hospitalised with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the UK: protocol of the UKGRIS cluster-randomised registry-based trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032165. [PMID: 31492797 PMCID: PMC6731819 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) there is a gap between the use of class I guideline recommended therapies and clinical practice. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is recommended in international guidelines for the risk stratification of NSTEACS, but its impact on adherence to guideline-indicated treatments and reducing adverse clinical outcomes is unknown. The objective of the UK GRACE Risk Score Intervention Study (UKGRIS) trial is to assess the effectiveness of the GRACE risk score tool and associated treatment recommendations on the use of guideline-indicated care and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The UKGRIS, a parallel-group cluster randomised registry-based controlled trial, will allocate hospitals in a 1:1 ratio to manage NSTEACS by standard care or according to the GRACE risk score and associated international guidelines. UKGRIS will recruit a minimum of 3000 patients from at least 30 English National Health Service hospitals and collect healthcare data from national electronic health records. The co-primary endpoints are the use of guideline-indicated therapies, and the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, new onset heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular readmission at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include duration of inpatient hospital stay over 12 months, EQ-5D-5L responses and utilities, unscheduled revascularisation and the components of the composite endpoint over 12 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has ethical approval (North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee reference: 14/NE/1180). Findings will be announced at relevant conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals in line with the funder's open access policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN29731761; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin C Everett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Catherine Reynolds
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Fernandez
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Linda Sharples
- Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kathryn Carruthers
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Harry Hemingway
- Health Data Research UK London, UCL, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK
- The National Institute for Health Research UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Derek P Chew
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Chris P Gale
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kunadian V, Wilson N, Stocken DD, Ali H, McColl E, Burns G, Howe N, Fisher A, De Soyza A. Antiplatelet therapy in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled proof-of-concept trial. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5:00110-2019. [PMID: 31403053 PMCID: PMC6680071 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00110-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The APPLE COPD-ICON2 trial is a prospective 2×2 factorial, double-blinded proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial targeting patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) without prior history of cardiovascular disease. The primary goal of this trial is to investigate if treatment with antiplatelet therapy will produce the predefined cut-off of platelet inhibition measured using the Multiplate test in COPD patients. Eligible patients were randomised to aspirin plus placebo, ticagrelor plus placebo, aspirin plus ticagrelor or placebo only for 6 months. The primary outcome comprises inhibition (binary response) of arachidonic acid- (ASPI test, cut-off <40) and adenosine diphosphate- (ADP test, cut-off <46) induced platelet aggregation at 6 months. 543 patients were screened and 120 patients were recruited with mean age of 67.5 years; 47.5% patients were male. The per-protocol ASPI test response rate to aspirin was 68.3% (95% CI 52.3–80.9%). The per-protocol ADP test response rate to ticagrelaor was 68.8% (95% CI 50.4–82.6%). Platelet response to antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor was not observed in nearly one-third of COPD patients without prior history of cardiovascular disease. These findings support the high pro-thrombotic milieu and the need for further research to determine the effect of antiplatelet/antithrombotic therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in COPD patients. COPD is the world's number 2 killer. In our study, treatment with antiplatelet therapy in COPD patients did not lead to adequate platelet response in just under a third of patients, emphasising the high thrombotic milieu in these patients.http://bit.ly/2WT8241
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Kunadian
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nina Wilson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Leeds Institute of Clinical Trial Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hani Ali
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine McColl
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Graham Burns
- Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicola Howe
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Fisher
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anthony De Soyza
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Paton MF, Gierula J, Jamil HA, Lowry JE, Byrom R, Gillott RG, Chumun H, Cubbon RM, Cairns DA, Stocken DD, Kearney MT, Witte KK. Optimising pacemaker therapy and medical therapy in pacemaker patients for heart failure: protocol for the OPT-PACE randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028613. [PMID: 31320354 PMCID: PMC6661620 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Permanent artificial pacemaker implantation is a safe and effective treatment for bradycardia and is associated with extended longevity and improved quality of life. However, the most common long-term complication of standard pacemaker therapy is pacemaker-associated heart failure. Pacemaker follow-up is potentially an opportunity to screen for heart failure to assess and optimise patient devices and medical therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study is a multicentre, phase-3 randomised trial. The 1200 participants will be people who have a permanent pacemaker for bradycardia for at least 12 months, randomly assigned to undergo a transthoracic echocardiogram with their pacemaker check, thereby tailoring their management directed by left ventricular function or the pacemaker check alone, continuing with routine follow-up. The primary outcome measure is time to all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes include external validation of our risk stratification model to predict onset of heart failure and quality of life assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial design and protocol have received national ethical approval (12/YH/0487). The results of this randomised trial will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, communicated to healthcare professionals and patient involvement groups and highlighted using social media campaigns. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01819662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria F Paton
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John Gierula
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Haqeel A Jamil
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Judith E Lowry
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rowena Byrom
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard G Gillott
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Hemant Chumun
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard M Cubbon
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David A Cairns
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark T Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Klaus K Witte
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Graziadio S, O’Leary RA, Stocken DD, Power M, Allen AJ, Simpson AJ, Price DA. Can mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) increase the prognostic accuracy of NEWS in predicting deterioration in patients admitted to hospital with mild to moderately severe illness? A prospective single-centre observational study. BMJ Open 2019; 8:e020337. [PMID: 30798282 PMCID: PMC6278796 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the value added to the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) by mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) blood level in predicting deterioration in mild to moderately ill people. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING The Medical Admissions Suite of the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle. PARTICIPANTS 300 adults with NEWS between 2 and 5 on admission. Exclusion criteria included receiving palliative care, or admitted for social reasons or self-harming. Patients were enrolled between September and December 2015, and followed up for 30 days after discharge. OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who, within 72 hours, had an acuity increase, defined as any combination of an increase of at least 2 in the NEWS; transfer to a higher-dependency bed or monitored area; death; or for those discharged from hospital, readmission for medical reasons. RESULTS NEWS and MR-proADM together predicted acuity increase more accurately than NEWS alone, increasing the area under the curve (AUC) to 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) from 0.55 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.62). When the confounding effects of presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure and interaction with MR-proADM were included, the prognostic accuracy further increased the AUC to 0.69 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS MR-proADM is potentially a clinically useful biomarker for deterioration in patients admitted to hospital with a mild to moderately severe acute illness, that is, with NEWS between 2 and 5. As a growing number of National Health Service hospitals are routinely recording the NEWS on their clinical information systems, further research should assess the practicality and use of developing a decision aid based on admission NEWS, MR-proADM level, and possibly other clinical data and other biomarkers that could further improve prognostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Graziadio
- NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel Amie O’Leary
- NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Power
- NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A Joy Allen
- NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A John Simpson
- NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Ashley Price
- NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Soomro N, Lecouturier J, Stocken DD, Shen J, Hynes AM, Ainsworth HF, Breen D, Oades G, Rix D, Aitchison M. Surveillance versus ablation for incidentally diagnosed small renal tumours: the SURAB feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess 2019; 21:1-68. [PMID: 29280434 DOI: 10.3310/hta21810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty around the appropriate management of small renal tumours. Treatments include partial nephrectomy, ablation and active surveillance. OBJECTIVES To explore the feasibility of a randomised trial of ablation versus active surveillance. DESIGN Two-stage feasibility study: stage 1 - clinician survey and co-design work; and stage 2 - randomised feasibility study with qualitative and economic components. METHODS Stage 1 - survey of radiologists and urologists, and development of patient information materials. Stage 2 - patients identified across eight UK centres with small renal tumours (< 4 cm) were randomised (1 : 1 ratio) to ablation or active surveillance in an unblinded manner. Randomisation was carried out by a central computer system. The primary objective was to determine willingness to participate and to randomise a target of 60 patients. The qualitative and economic data were collected separately. RESULTS The trial was conducted across eight centres, with a site-specific period of recruitment ranging from 3 to 11 months. Of the 154 patients screened, 36 were eligible and were provided with study details. Seven agreed to be randomised and one patient was found ineligible following biopsy results. Six patients (17% of those eligible) were randomised: three patients received ablation and no serious adverse events were recorded. The 3- and 6-month data were collected for four (67%) and three (50%) out of the six patients, respectively. The qualitative substudy identified factors directly impacting on the recruitment of this trial. These included patient and clinician preferences, organisational factors (variation in clinical pathway) and standard treatment not included. The health economic questionnaire was designed and piloted; however, the sample size of recruited patients was insufficient to draw a conclusion on the feasibility of the health economics. CONCLUSIONS The trial did not meet the criteria for progression and the recruitment rate was lower than hypothesised, demonstrating that a full trial is presently not possible. The qualitative study identified factors that led to variation in recruitment across the sites. Implementation of organisational and operational measures can increase recruitment in any future trial. There was insufficient information to conduct a full economic analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31161700. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 81. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naeem Soomro
- The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jan Lecouturier
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jing Shen
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ann Marie Hynes
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Holly F Ainsworth
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Breen
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - David Rix
- The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jia X, Sun ZD, Patel JV, Flood K, Stocken DD, Scott DJA. Systematic review of endovascular intervention and surgery for common femoral artery atherosclerotic disease. Br J Surg 2018; 106:13-22. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endovascular intervention has emerged as a potential alternative to open surgery in treating common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic disease. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy of both techniques.
Methods
Thirteen electronic databases from 1980 to 3 January 2018 were searched. Study quality was assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Interventional Procedure Programme quality assessment tool. Safety and efficacy outcome measures were analysed.
Results
Thirty-one studies reporting 813 endovascular procedures and 3835 endarterectomies were included. Only two small RCTs have been reported. The methodological quality of available studies was generally low and follow-up short. Safety endpoint assessment revealed a similar risk of wound haematoma for endovascular intervention and endarterectomy (5·5 (95 per cent c.i. 0·2 to 17·2) versus 3·9 (1·7 to 6·9) per cent respectively), a lower risk of wound infection with endovascular procedures (0 versus 5·9 (3·4 to 9·0) per cent) and a lower risk of wound lymph leakage (0 versus 5·7 (3·3 to 8·6) per cent). Efficacy endpoint assessment at 1 year identified that endovascular intervention had a lower primary patency rate than endarterectomy (78·8 (73·3 to 83·8) versus 96·0 (92·2 to 98·6) per cent respectively), a higher revascularization rate (16·0 (6·1 to 29·4) versus 5·8 (1·0 to 14·2) per cent) and a similar amputation rate (2·7 (1·2 to 4·8) versus 1·9 (0·7 to 3·8) per cent).
Conclusion
Endovascular intervention of CFA disease appears to reduce the risk of wound complications but is associated with a lower patency rate and increased rates of subsequent revascularization procedures. Standardization of the endovascular technique and quantification of the proportions of patients suitable for either technique are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Jia
- Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Z D Sun
- Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - J V Patel
- Radiology Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - K Flood
- Radiology Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - D D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D J A Scott
- Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wong LL, Fisher HF, Stocken DD, Rice S, Khanna A, Heneghan MA, Oo YH, Mells G, Kendrick S, Dyson JK, Jones DEJ. The Impact of Autoimmune Hepatitis and Its Treatment on Health Utility. Hepatology 2018; 68:1487-1497. [PMID: 29663477 PMCID: PMC6585808 DOI: 10.1002/hep.30031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Patient reporting suggests that the physical and psychological effects of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can be substantial. However, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with AIH remains incompletely characterized, and health utility remains to be explored. Treatment for AIH often includes the use of corticosteroids, which are agents that can be associated with significant adverse effects. Here we explore the impact of AIH and its treatments on patient-reported HRQOL and health utility in a large cohort of prevalent cases from the United Kingdom Autoimmune Hepatitis (UK-AIH) national study. Data were collected from 990 adult participants with a clinical diagnosis of AIH using validated HRQOL tools including the European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and clinical data forms. The EQ-5D-5L dimension scores were compared with UK population norms and with a disease control cohort with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Within the AIH cohort, regression analysis was used to explore associations between HRQOL and demographic and clinical variables with a particular focus on the impact of AIH therapies including corticosteroid use. HRQOL, measured by the EQ-5D-5L utility index, is shown to be significantly impaired in our cohort of AIH patients compared with population norms. Within the AIH cohort, corticosteroid use was found to be significantly associated with impaired HRQOL, even when controlling for biochemical disease activity status. CONCLUSION Our data show evidence of HRQOL impairment in a large cohort of AIH patients compared with the general population. Furthermore, corticosteroid use is strongly associated with decreased HRQOL, independent of remission status. This highlights the need for better corticosteroid-free therapy approaches and it emphasizes the need for future novel therapeutic trials in AIH. (Hepatology 2018; 00:000-000).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Lee Wong
- Institute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom,Liver Unit, Freeman HospitalThe Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Holly F Fisher
- Institute of Health and SocietyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials ResearchUniversity of LeedsLeedsUnited Kingdom
| | - Stephen Rice
- Institute of Health and SocietyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Amardeep Khanna
- Institute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom,Liver Unit, Freeman HospitalThe Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Ye Htun Oo
- Centre for Liver Research and NIHR BRCUniversity of Birmingham and Liver Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUnited Kingdom
| | - George Mells
- Academic Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s HospitalCambridge Biomedical CampusUnited Kingdom
| | - Stuart Kendrick
- GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)Research and DevelopmentHertfordshireUnited Kingdom
| | - Jessica Katharine Dyson
- Institute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom,Liver Unit, Freeman HospitalThe Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - David E. J. Jones
- Institute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Little SA, Speight J, Leelarathna L, Walkinshaw E, Tan HK, Bowes A, Lubina-Solomon A, Chadwick TJ, Stocken DD, Brennand C, Marshall SM, Wood R, Kerr D, Flanagan D, Heller SR, Evans ML, Shaw JAM. Sustained Reduction in Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia: Two-Year Follow-up in the HypoCOMPaSS Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1600-1607. [PMID: 29661916 DOI: 10.2337/dc17-2682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Severe hypoglycemia is a feared complication of type 1 diabetes; yet, few trials have targeted prevention using optimized self-management (educational, therapeutic, and technological support). We aimed to investigate whether improved awareness and reduced severe hypoglycemia, achieved during an intensive randomized clinical trial (RCT), were sustained after return to routine care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Ninety-six adults with type 1 diabetes (29 ± 12 years' duration) and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia at five U.K. tertiary referral diabetes centers were recruited into a 24-week 2 × 2 factorial RCT (HypoCOMPaSS). Participants were randomized to pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) or multiple daily injections (MDIs) and real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), with equal education/attention to all groups. At 24 weeks, participants returned to routine care with follow-up until 24 months, including free choice of MDI/CSII; RT-CGM vs. SMBG comparison continued to 24 months. Primary outcome was mean difference (baseline to 24 months [between groups]) in hypoglycemia awareness. RESULTS Improvement in hypoglycemia awareness was sustained (Gold score at baseline 5.1 ± 1.1 vs. 24 months 3.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.0001). Severe hypoglycemia rate was reduced from 8.9 ± 12.8 episodes/person-year over the 12 months prestudy to 0.4 ± 0.8 over 24 months (P < 0.0001). HbA1c improved (baseline 8.2 ± 3.2% [66 ± 12 mmol/mol] vs. 24 months 7.7 ± 3.1% [61 ± 10 mmol/mol]; P = 0.003). Improvement in treatment satisfaction and reduced fear of hypoglycemia were sustained. There were no significant differences between interventions at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS Optimized insulin replacement and glucose monitoring underpinned by hypoglycemia-focused structured education should be provided to all with type 1 diabetes complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart A Little
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K.,Newcastle Diabetes Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Jane Speight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.,The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,AHP Research, Hornchurch, U.K
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Emma Walkinshaw
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sheffield University, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Horng Kai Tan
- Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, U.K
| | - Anita Bowes
- Centre for Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Poole, U.K
| | | | - Thomas J Chadwick
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Catherine Brennand
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Sally M Marshall
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K.,Newcastle Diabetes Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Ruth Wood
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - David Kerr
- Centre for Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Poole, U.K
| | | | - Simon R Heller
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sheffield University, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Mark L Evans
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - James A M Shaw
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K. .,Newcastle Diabetes Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Carbone M, Nardi A, Flack S, Carpino G, Varvaropoulou N, Gavrila C, Spicer A, Badrock J, Bernuzzi F, Cardinale V, Ainsworth HF, Heneghan MA, Thorburn D, Bathgate A, Jones R, Neuberger JM, Battezzati PM, Zuin M, Taylor-Robinson S, Donato MF, Kirby J, Mitchell-Thain R, Floreani A, Sampaziotis F, Muratori L, Alvaro D, Marzioni M, Miele L, Marra F, Giannini E, Gaudio E, Ronca V, Bonato G, Cristoferi L, Malinverno F, Gerussi A, Stocken DD, Cordell HJ, Hirschfield GM, Alexander GJ, Sandford RN, Jones DE, Invernizzi P, Mells GF. Pretreatment prediction of response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis: development and validation of the UDCA Response Score. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:626-634. [PMID: 30017646 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(18)30163-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to primary biliary cholangitis: all patients begin treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) monotherapy and those with an inadequate biochemical response after 12 months are subsequently considered for second-line therapies. However, as a result, patients at the highest risk can wait the longest for effective treatment. We determined whether UDCA response can be accurately predicted using pretreatment clinical parameters. METHODS We did logistic regression analysis of pretreatment variables in a discovery cohort of patients in the UK with primary biliary cholangitis to derive the best-fitting model of UDCA response, defined as alkaline phosphatase less than 1·67 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), measured after 12 months of treatment with UDCA. We validated the model in an external cohort of patients with primary biliary cholangitis and treated with UDCA in Italy. Additionally, we assessed correlations between model predictions and key histological features, such as biliary injury and fibrosis, on liver biopsy samples. FINDINGS 2703 participants diagnosed with primary biliary cholangitis between Jan 1, 1998, and May 31, 2015, were included in the UK-PBC cohort for derivation of the model. The following pretreatment parameters were associated with lower probability of UDCA response: higher alkaline phosphatase concentration (p<0·0001), higher total bilirubin concentration (p=0·0003), lower aminotransferase concentration (p=0·0012), younger age (p<0·0001), longer interval from diagnosis to the start of UDCA treatment (treatment time lag, p<0·0001), and worsening of alkaline phosphatase concentration from diagnosis (p<0·0001). Based on these variables, we derived a predictive score of UDCA response. In the external validation cohort, 460 patients diagnosed with primary biliary cholangitis were treated with UDCA, with follow-up data until May 31, 2016. In this validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the score was 0·83 (95% CI 0·79-0·87). In 20 liver biopsy samples from patients with primary biliary cholangitis, the UDCA response score was associated with ductular reaction (r=-0·556, p=0·0130) and intermediate hepatocytes (probability of response was 0·90 if intermediate hepatocytes were absent vs 0·51 if present). INTERPRETATION We have derived and externally validated a model based on pretreatment variables that accurately predicts UDCA response. Association with histological features provides face validity. This model provides a basis to explore alternative approaches to treatment stratification in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. FUNDING UK Medical Research Council and University of Milan-Bicocca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Carbone
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Nardi
- Department of Mathematics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Steve Flack
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Guido Carpino
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Ann Spicer
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Badrock
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Francesca Bernuzzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Cardinale
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Polo Pontino, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Holly F Ainsworth
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Michael A Heneghan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bathgate
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Liver Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Massimo Zuin
- Division of Internal Medicine and Liver Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Milan, Italy
| | - Simon Taylor-Robinson
- Liver Unit, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maria F Donato
- CRC "AM e A Migliavacca" Center for the Study of Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - John Kirby
- Applied Immunobiology and Transplantation Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | | | - Annarosa Floreani
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Fotios Sampaziotis
- Department of Surgery, Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, Anne McLaren Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luigi Muratori
- Liver Unit, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Domenico Alvaro
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Polo Pontino, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Marzioni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ospedali Riuniti University Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luca Miele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Marra
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Edoardo Giannini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eugenio Gaudio
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Legal Medicine, and Orthopedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ronca
- Division of Internal Medicine and Liver Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Bonato
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Cristoferi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Malinverno
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Gerussi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Heather J Cordell
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Gideon M Hirschfield
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Richard N Sandford
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E Jones
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Pietro Invernizzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - George F Mells
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brass D, Fouweather T, Stocken DD, Macdonald C, Wilkinson J, Lloyd J, Farr PM, Reynolds NJ, Hampton PJ. An observer-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial comparing localized immersion psoralen-ultraviolet A with localized narrowband ultraviolet B for the treatment of palmar hand eczema. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179:63-71. [PMID: 29235664 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand eczema is a common inflammatory dermatosis that causes significant patient morbidity. Previous studies comparing psoralen-ultraviolet A (PUVA) with narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) have been small, nonrandomized and retrospective. OBJECTIVES To conduct an observer-blinded randomized controlled pilot study using validated scoring criteria to compare immersion PUVA with NB-UVB for the treatment of chronic hand eczema unresponsive to topical steroids. METHODS Sixty patients with hand eczema unresponsive to clobetasol propionate 0·05% were randomized to receive either immersion PUVA or NB-UVB twice weekly for 12 weeks with assessments at intervals of 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving 'clear' or 'almost clear' Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included assessment of the modified Total Lesion and Symptom Score (mTLSS) and the Dermatology Life Quality index (DLQI). RESULTS In both treatment arms, 23 patients completed the 12-week assessment for the primary outcome measure. In the PUVA group, five patients achieved 'clear' and eight 'almost clear' [intention-to-treat (ITT) response rate 43%]. In the NB-UVB group, two achieved 'clear' and five 'almost clear' (ITT response rate 23%). For the secondary outcomes, median mTLSS scores were similar between groups at baseline (PUVA 9·5, NB-UVB 9) and at 12 weeks (PUVA 3, NB-UVB 4). Changes in DLQI were similar, with improvements in both groups. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized pilot trial recruitment was challenging. After randomization, there were acceptable levels of compliance and safety in each treatment schedule, but lower levels of retention. Using validated scoring systems - PGA, mTLSS and DLQI - as measures of treatment response, the trial demonstrated that both PUVA and NB-UVB reduced the severity of chronic palmar hand eczema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Brass
- Newcastle Dermatology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - T Fouweather
- Biostatistics Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - D D Stocken
- Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
| | - C Macdonald
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - J Wilkinson
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - J Lloyd
- Newcastle Dermatology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - P M Farr
- Newcastle Dermatology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - N J Reynolds
- Newcastle Dermatology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - P J Hampton
- Newcastle Dermatology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Meyer T, Fox R, Ma YT, Ross PJ, James MW, Sturgess R, Stubbs C, Stocken DD, Wall L, Watkinson A, Hacking N, Evans TRJ, Collins P, Hubner RA, Cunningham D, Primrose JN, Johnson PJ, Palmer DH. Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (TACE 2): a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:565-575. [PMID: 28648803 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30156-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the standard of care for patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma, while the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib improves survival in patients with advanced disease. We aimed to determine whether TACE with sorafenib improves progression-free survival versus TACE with placebo. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (TACE 2) in 20 hospitals in the UK for patients with unresectable, liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients were eligible if they were at least aged 18 years, had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less, and had Child-Pugh A liver disease. Patients were randomised 1:1 by computerised minimisation algorithm to continuous oral sorafenib (400 mg twice-daily) or matching placebo combined with TACE using drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE), which was given via the hepatic artery 2-5 weeks after randomisation and according to radiological response and patient tolerance thereafter. Patients were stratified according to randomising centre and serum α-fetoprotein concentration (<400 ng/mL and ≥400 ng/mL). Only the trial coordinator was unmasked to treatment allocation before patient progression during the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival defined as the interval between randomisation and progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause, and was analysed by intention-to-treat. Safety was analysed by intention-to-treat. The trial has been completed and the final results are reported. The trial is registered at EudraCT, number 2008-005073-36, and ISRCTN, number ISRCTN93375053. FINDINGS Between Nov 4, 2010, and Dec 7, 2015, the trial enrolled 399 patients and was terminated after a planned interim futility analysis. 86 patients failed screening and 313 remaining patients were randomly assigned: 157 to sorafenib and 156 to placebo. The median daily dose was 660 mg (IQR 389·2-800·0) sorafenib versus 800 mg (758·2-800·0) placebo, and median duration of therapy was 120·0 days (IQR 43·0-266·0) for sorafenib versus 162·0 days (70·0-323·5) for placebo. There was no evidence of difference in progression-free survival between the sorafenib group and the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·99 [95% CI 0·77-1·27], p=0·94); median progression-free survival was 238·0 days (95% CI 221·0-281·0) in the sorafenib group and 235·0 days (209·0-322·0) in the placebo group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were fatigue (29 [18%] of 157 patients in the sorafenib group vs 21 [13%] of 156 patients in the placebo group), abdominal pain (20 [13%] vs 12 [8%]), diarrhoea (16 [10%] vs four [3%]), gastrointestinal disorders (18 [11%] vs 12 [8%]), and hand-foot skin reaction (12 [8%] and none). At least one serious adverse event was reported in 65 (41%) of 157 patients in the sorafenib group and 50 (32%) of 156 in the placebo group, and 181 serious adverse events were reported in total, 95 (52%) in the sorafenib group and 86 (48%) in the placebo group. Three deaths occurred in each group that were attributed to DEB-TACE. Four deaths were attributed to study drug; three in the sorafenib group and one in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION The addition of sorafenib to DEB-TACE does not improve progression-free survival in European patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Alternative systemic therapies need to be assessed in combination with TACE to improve patient outcomes. FUNDING Bayer PLC and BTG PLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Meyer
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, UK; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Richard Fox
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Paul J Ross
- Guy's Hospital, London, UK; King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Martin W James
- Guy's Hospital, London, UK; Nottingham University Hospitals NIHR BRC, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Clive Stubbs
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Lucy Wall
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Nigel Hacking
- Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | | - David Cunningham
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel H Palmer
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Henry J Grantham
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK; Newcastle Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nick J Reynolds
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK; Newcastle Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cranston A, Stocken DD, Stamp E, Roblin D, Hamlin J, Langtry J, Plummer R, Ashworth A, Burn J, Rajan N. Tropomyosin Receptor Antagonism in Cylindromatosis (TRAC), an early phase trial of a topical tropomyosin kinase inhibitor as a treatment for inherited CYLD defective skin tumours: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:111. [PMID: 28270164 PMCID: PMC5341402 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1812-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with germline mutations in a tumour suppressor gene called CYLD develop multiple, disfiguring, hair follicle tumours on the head and neck. The prognosis is poor, with up to one in four mutation carriers requiring complete surgical removal of the scalp. There are no effective medical alternatives to treat this condition. Whole genome molecular profiling experiments led to the discovery of an attractive molecular target in these skin tumour cells, named tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK), upon which these cells demonstrate an oncogenic dependency in preclinical studies. Recently, the development of an ointment containing a TRK inhibitor (pegcantratinib — previously CT327 — from Creabilis SA) allowed for the assessment of TRK inhibition in tumours from patients with inherited CYLD mutations. Methods/design Tropomysin Receptor Antagonism in Cylindromatosis (TRAC) is a two-part, exploratory, early phase, single-centre trial. Cohort 1 is a phase 1b open-labelled trial, and cohort 2 is a phase 2a randomised double-blinded exploratory placebo-controlled trial. Cohort 1 will determine the safety and acceptability of applying pegcantratinib for 4 weeks to a single tumour on a CYLD mutation carrier that is scheduled for a routine lesion excision (n = 8 patients). Cohort 2 will investigate if CYLD defective tumours respond following 12 weeks of treatment with pegcantratinib. As patients have multiple tumours, we intend to treat 10 tumours in each patient, 5 with active treatment and 5 with placebo. Patients will be allocated both active and placebo treatments to be applied randomly to tumours on the left or right side. The target is to treat 150 tumours in a maximum of 20 patients. Tumour volume will be measured at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of tumours responding to treatment by 12 weeks, based on change in tumour volume, with secondary measures based on adverse event profile, treatment compliance and acceptability, changes in tumour volume and surface area, patient quality of life and pain. Discussion Interventions for rare genetic skin diseases are often difficult to assess in an unbiased way due to small patient numbers and the challenges of incorporating adequate controls into trial design. Here we present a single-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial design that leverages the multiplicity of tumours seen in an inherited skin tumour syndrome that may inform the design of other studies in similar genetic diseases. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, ISRCTN75715723. Registered on 22 October 2014. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1812-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Cranston
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK.
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK.,Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Elaine Stamp
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - David Roblin
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 2BE, UK
| | - Julia Hamlin
- Ziarco Pharma Ltd, Innovation House, Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent, CT13 9ND, UK
| | - James Langtry
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Ruth Plummer
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Alan Ashworth
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - John Burn
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK
| | - Neil Rajan
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.,Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Camilleri N, Newbury-Birch D, McArdle P, Stocken DD, Thick T, Le Couteur A. Innovations in Practice: A case control and follow-up study of 'hard to reach' young people who suffered from multiple complex mental disorders. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2017; 22:49-57. [PMID: 32680404 DOI: 10.1111/camh.12202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations Project (IP) was a new multidisciplinary team based within an inner city, walk-in health centre, North East England (throughout 2011). The aim was to describe the social and mental disorders of the hard to reach young people (HTRYP) from the IP and compare with a matched sample who attended a Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and follow-up both samples 24 months after discharge. METHODS A retrospective review of clinical case notes of YP who attended the IP and CMHT. A 24-month (postdischarge) follow-up evaluation of the mental state and social function of the YP in both groups using Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (HoNOSCA) and Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). RESULTS Thirty-six referrals were accepted over a one-year period by the IP, 31 met criteria for the HTRYP, 15 were offered individually tailored therapy. The HTRYP who were more deprived compared to the CMHT matched sample (n = 115), experienced a higher median number of mental disorders (n = 3 compared to CMHT n = 1), higher severity scores and lower levels of social function (HTRYP HoNOSCA mean: 19.1 (95% CI 15.9-22.2) and CMHT mean: 11.2 (95% CI 2.0-23.0) p = <.001, and HTRYP CGAS mean: 51.0 (95% CI 46.0-56.2) and CMHT mean: 58.9 (95% CI 52.9-64.8), p = .05). The HTRYP made significantly greater improvement compared to CMHTYP; (HoNOSCA p = <.001 and CGAS p = <.002) at discharge. A total of 13 HTRYP and 9 CMHT YP attended the follow-up review at 24 months. There was substantial variability in terms of social function between the YP within each sample. CONCLUSIONS The term 'HTR' describes a state that may be often temporary, as opposed to lifelong. A bespoke service offering a developmental theoretical framework, regular reviews and an individualised care plan, was able to engage and had the potential to reduce morbidity suffered by HTRYP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nigel Camilleri
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddilley-Clarke Building, Richardson Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.,Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, County Durham DL2 2TS, UK
| | | | - Paul McArdle
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddilley-Clarke Building, Richardson Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Tony Thick
- Ponteland Road Health Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ann Le Couteur
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddilley-Clarke Building, Richardson Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.,Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McSweeney LA, O'Hara JT, Rousseau NS, Stocken DD, Sullivan F, Vale L, Wilkes S, Wilson JA, Haighton CA. 'Thinking that somebody's going to delay [a tonsillectomy] for one to two years is quite horrifying really': a qualitative feasibility study for the NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA Part 2). Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 42:578-583. [PMID: 27862965 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Level one evidence on the value of adult tonsillectomy versus non-surgical management remains scarce. Before embarking on a costly national randomised controlled trial, it is essential to establish its feasibility. DESIGN Feasibility study with in-depth qualitative and cognitive interviews. SETTING ENT staff and patients were recruited from nine hospital centres across England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS Patients who were referred for tonsillectomy (n = 15), a convenience sample of general practitioners (n = 11) and ear, nose and throat staff (n = 22). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES To ascertain whether ear, nose and throat staff would be willing to randomise patients to the treatment arms. To assess general practitioners' willingness to refer patients to the NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA) centres. To assess patients' willingness to be randomised and the acceptability of the deferred surgery treatment arm. To ascertain whether the study could progress to the pilot trial stage. RESULTS Ear, nose and throat staff and general practitioners were willing to randomise patients to the proposed NATTINA. Not all ENT staff were in equipoise concerning the treatment pathways. Patients were reluctant to be randomised into the deferred surgery group if they had already waited a substantial time before being referred. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that the NATTINA may not be feasible. Proposed methods could not be realistically assessed without a pilot trial. Due to the importance of the question, as evidenced by NATTINA clinicians, and strong support from ENT staff, the pilot trial proceeded, with modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A McSweeney
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J T O'Hara
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,ENT Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - N S Rousseau
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - D D Stocken
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - F Sullivan
- Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.,Department of Community and Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Vale
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - S Wilkes
- Department of Pharmacy Health and Well-being, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.,UK Coquet Medical Group, Amble, Northumberland, UK
| | - J A Wilson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,ENT Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - C A Haighton
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Paleri V, Wood J, Patterson J, Stocken DD, Cole M, Vale L, Franks J, Guerrero-Urbano T, Donnelly R, Barclay S, Rapley T, Rousseau N. A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2016; 2:29. [PMID: 27965848 PMCID: PMC5154009 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0069-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are 7000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) treated by the NHS each year. Stage III and IV HNSCC can be treated non-surgically by radio therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT can affect eating and drinking through a range of side effects with 90 % of patients undergoing this treatment requiring nutritional support via gastrostomy (G) or nasogastric (NG) tube feeding. Long-term dysphagia following CRT is a primary concern for patients. The effect of enteral feeding routes on swallowing function is not well understood, and the two feeding methods have, to date, not been compared to assess which leads to a better patient outcome. The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two options with particular emphasis on patient willingness to be randomised and clinician willingness to approach eligible patients. Methods/design This is a mixed methods multicentre study to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy versus oral feeding plus as required nasogastric tube feeding in patients with HNSCC. A total of 60 participants will be randomised to the two arms of the study (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome of feasibility is a composite of recruitment (willingness to randomise and be randomised) and retention. A qualitative process evaluation investigating patient, family and friends and staff experiences of trial participation will also be conducted alongside an economic modelling exercise to synthesise available evidence and provide estimates of cost-effectiveness and value of information. Participants will be assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation), during CRT weekly, 3 months and 6 months. Discussion Clinicians are in equipoise over the enteral feeding options for patients being treated with CRT. Swallowing outcomes have been identified as a top priority for patients following treatment and this trial would inform a future larger scale RCT in this area to inform best practice. Trial registration ISRCTN48569216
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinidh Paleri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK ; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Joanne Patterson
- City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mike Cole
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | - Stewart Barclay
- Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle Dental Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tim Rapley
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Little SA, Leelarathna L, Walkinshaw E, Tan HK, Chapple O, Lubina-Solomon A, Chadwick TJ, Barendse S, Stocken DD, Brennand C, Marshall SM, Wood R, Speight J, Kerr D, Flanagan D, Heller SR, Evans ML, Shaw JAM. Response to comment on Little et al. Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS). Diabetes Care 2014;37:2114-2122. Diabetes Care 2014; 37:e272-3. [PMID: 25414405 DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart A Little
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Emma Walkinshaw
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sheffield University, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Horng Kai Tan
- Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, U.K
| | - Olivia Chapple
- Bournemouth Diabetes and Endocrine Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, U.K
| | | | - Thomas J Chadwick
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | | | - Deborah D Stocken
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Catherine Brennand
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Sally M Marshall
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Ruth Wood
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Jane Speight
- AHP Research, Hornchurch, U.K. The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Australia-Vic, Melbourne, Australia Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - David Kerr
- Centre for Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, U.K
| | | | - Simon R Heller
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sheffield University, Sheffield, U.K
| | - Mark L Evans
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - James A M Shaw
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Little SA, Leelarathna L, Walkinshaw E, Tan HK, Chapple O, Lubina-Solomon A, Chadwick TJ, Barendse S, Stocken DD, Brennand C, Marshall SM, Wood R, Speight J, Kerr D, Flanagan D, Heller SR, Evans ML, Shaw JAM. Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS). Diabetes Care 2014; 37:2114-22. [PMID: 24854041 DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) can be improved and severe hypoglycemia (SH) prevented in type 1 diabetes, we compared an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) with multiple daily injections (MDIs) and adjuvant real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT) with conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A 24-week 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial in adults with type 1 diabetes and IAH was conducted. All received comparable education, support, and congruent therapeutic targets aimed at rigorous avoidance of biochemical hypoglycemia without relaxing overall control. Primary end point was between-intervention difference in 24-week hypoglycemia awareness (Gold score). RESULTS A total of 96 participants (mean diabetes duration 29 years) were randomized. Overall, biochemical hypoglycemia (≤3.0 mmol/L) decreased (53 ± 63 to 24 ± 56 min/24 h; P = 0.004 [t test]) without deterioration in HbA1c. Hypoglycemia awareness improved (5.1 ± 1.1 to 4.1 ± 1.6; P = 0.0001 [t test]) with decreased SH (8.9 ± 13.4 to 0.8 ± 1.8 episodes/patient-year; P = 0.0001 [t test]). At 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in awareness comparing CSII with MDI (4.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.2 ± 1.7; difference 0.1; 95% CI -0.6 to 0.8) and RT with SMBG (4.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.0 ± 1.7; difference -0.3; 95% CI -1.0 to 0.4). Between-group analyses demonstrated comparable reductions in SH, fear of hypoglycemia, and insulin doses with equivalent HbA1c. Treatment satisfaction was higher with CSII than MDI (32 ± 3 vs. 29 ± 6; P = 0.0003 [t test]), but comparable with SMBG and RT (30 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 5; P = 0.79 [t test]). CONCLUSIONS Hypoglycemia awareness can be improved and recurrent SH prevented in long-standing type 1 diabetes without relaxing HbA1c. Similar biomedical outcomes can be attained with conventional MDI and SMBG regimens compared with CSII/RT, although satisfaction was higher with CSII.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart A Little
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Emma Walkinshaw
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sheffield University, U.K
| | - Horng Kai Tan
- Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, U.K
| | - Olivia Chapple
- Bournemouth Diabetes and Endocrine Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, U.K
| | | | - Thomas J Chadwick
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | | | - Deborah D Stocken
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Catherine Brennand
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Sally M Marshall
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Ruth Wood
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Jane Speight
- AHP Research, Hornchurch, U.K.The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Australia-Vic, Melbourne, AustraliaCentre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - David Kerr
- Centre for Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Bournemouth University, U.K
| | | | - Simon R Heller
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sheffield University, U.K
| | - Mark L Evans
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - James A M Shaw
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Valle JW, Palmer D, Jackson R, Cox T, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P, Rawcliffe CL, Bassi C, Stocken DD, Cunningham D, O'Reilly D, Goldstein D, Robinson BA, Karapetis C, Scarfe A, Lacaine F, Sand J, Izbicki JR, Mayerle J, Dervenis C, Oláh A, Butturini G, Lind PA, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Sumpter K, Carter R, Büchler MW. Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:504-12. [PMID: 24419109 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.50.7657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 275] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant chemotherapy improves patient survival rates after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but the optimal duration and time to initiate chemotherapy is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated within the international, phase III, European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer-3 (version 2) study were included if they had been randomly assigned to chemotherapy. Overall survival analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis, retaining patients in their randomized groups, and adjusting the overall treatment effect by known prognostic variables as well as the start time of chemotherapy. RESULTS There were 985 patients, of whom 486 (49%) received gemcitabine and 499 (51%) received fluorouracil; 675 patients (68%) completed all six cycles of chemotherapy (full course) and 293 patients (30%) completed one to five cycles. Lymph node involvement, resection margins status, tumor differentiation, and completion of therapy were all shown by multivariable Cox regression to be independent survival factors. Overall survival favored patients who completed the full six courses of treatment versus those who did not (hazard ratio [HR], 0.516; 95% CI, 0.443 to 0.601; P < .001). Time to starting chemotherapy did not influence overall survival rates for the full study population (HR, 0.985; 95% CI, 0.956 to 1.015). Chemotherapy start time was an important survival factor only for the subgroup of patients who did not complete therapy, in favor of later treatment (P < .001). CONCLUSION Completion of all six cycles of planned adjuvant chemotherapy rather than early initiation was an independent prognostic factor after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. There seems to be no difference in outcome if chemotherapy is delayed up to 12 weeks, thus allowing adequate time for postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan W Valle
- Juan W. Valle, Derek O'Reilly, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester; Richard Jackson, Trevor Cox, John P. Neoptolemos, Paula Ghaneh, Charlotte L. Rawcliffe, Liverpool Cancer Research UK Centre and the National Institute for Health Research Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool; Daniel Palmer, the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Deborah D. Stocken, the Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital Foundation Trust, Sutton; Mark R. Middleton, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford; Alan Anthoney, The Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds; Kate Sumpter, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne; Ross Carter, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Claudio Bassi, Giovanni Butturini, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; David Goldstein, Bridget A. Robinson, Christos Karapetis, the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; Andrew Scarfe, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Francois Lacaine, Hôpital TENON, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Universite Pierre Et Marie Curie, Paris, France; Juhani Sand, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Jakob R. Izbicki, University of Hamburg, Hamburg; Julia Mayerle, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Greifswald; Markus W. Büchler, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Christos Dervenis, the Agia Olga Hospital, Athens, Greece; Attila Oláh, the Petz Aladar Hospital, Gyor, Hungary; Pehr A. Lind, Karolinska-Stockholm Söder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hui EP, Taylor GS, Jia H, Ma BBY, Chan SL, Ho R, Wong WL, Wilson S, Johnson BF, Edwards C, Stocken DD, Rickinson AB, Steven NM, Chan ATC. Phase I trial of recombinant modified vaccinia ankara encoding Epstein-Barr viral tumor antigens in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Cancer Res 2013; 73:1676-88. [PMID: 23348421 PMCID: PMC6485495 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with several malignancies including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a high incidence tumor in Chinese populations, in which tumor cells express the two EBV antigens EB nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) and latent membrane protein 2 (LMP2). Here, we report the phase I trial of a recombinant vaccinia virus, MVA-EL, which encodes an EBNA1/LMP2 fusion protein designed to boost T-cell immunity to these antigens. The vaccine was delivered to Hong Kong patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma to determine a safe and immunogenic dose. The patients, all in remission more than 12 weeks after primary therapy, received three intradermal MVA-EL vaccinations at three weekly intervals, using five escalating dose levels between 5 × 10(7) and 5 × 10(8) plaque-forming unit (pfu). Blood samples were taken during prescreening, immediately before vaccination, one week afterward and at intervals up to one year later. Immunogenicity was tested by IFN-γ ELIspot assays using complete EBNA1 and LMP2 15-mer peptide mixes and known epitope peptides relevant to patient MHC type. Eighteen patients were treated, three per dose level one to four and six at the highest dose, without dose-limiting toxicity. T-cell responses to one or both vaccine antigens were increased in 15 of 18 patients and, in many cases, were mapped to known CD4 and CD8 epitopes in EBNA1 and/or LMP2. The range of these responses suggested a direct relationship with vaccine dose, with all six patients at the highest dose level giving strong EBNA1/LMP2 responses. We concluded that MVA-EL is both safe and immunogenic, allowing the highest dose to be forwarded to phase II studies examining clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin P Hui
- State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir YK Pao Center for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Graham S Taylor
- Cancer Research UK Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TA, United Kingdom
| | - Hui Jia
- Cancer Research UK Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TA, United Kingdom
| | - Brigette BY Ma
- State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir YK Pao Center for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Stephen L Chan
- State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir YK Pao Center for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Rosalie Ho
- State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir YK Pao Center for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - WL Wong
- State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir YK Pao Center for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Steven Wilson
- Health Protection Agency, West Midlands Public Health Laboratory, Heart of England Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ceri Edwards
- Cancer Research UK Drug Development Office, London, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Cancer Research UK Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TA, United Kingdom
| | - Alan B Rickinson
- Cancer Research UK Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TA, United Kingdom
| | - Neil M Steven
- Cancer Research UK Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TA, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony TC Chan
- State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir YK Pao Center for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tudur Smith C, Stocken DD, Dunn J, Cox T, Ghaneh P, Cunningham D, Neoptolemos JP. The value of source data verification in a cancer clinical trial. PLoS One 2012; 7:e51623. [PMID: 23251597 PMCID: PMC3520949 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2012] [Accepted: 11/05/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Source data verification (SDV) is a resource intensive method of quality assurance frequently used in clinical trials. There is no empirical evidence to suggest that SDV would impact on comparative treatment effect results from a clinical trial. METHODS Data discrepancies and comparative treatment effects obtained following 100% SDV were compared to those based on data without SDV. Overall survival (OS) and Progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and Cox models. Tumour response classifications and comparative treatment Odds Ratios (ORs) for the outcome objective response rate, and number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were compared. OS estimates based on SDV data were compared against estimates obtained from centrally monitored data. FINDINGS Data discrepancies were identified between different monitoring procedures for the majority of variables examined, with some variation in discrepancy rates. There were no systematic patterns to discrepancies and their impact was negligible on OS, the primary outcome of the trial (HR (95% CI): 1.18(0.99 to 1.41), p = 0.064 with 100% SDV; 1.18(0.99 to 1.42), p = 0.068 without SDV; 1.18(0.99 to 1.40), p = 0.073 with central monitoring). Results were similar for PFS. More extreme discrepancies were found for the subjective outcome overall objective response (OR (95% CI): 1.67(1.04 to 2.68), p = 0.03 with 100% SDV; 2.45(1.49 to 4.04), p = 0.0003 without any SDV) which was mostly due to differing CT scans. INTERPRETATION Quality assurance methods used in clinical trials should be informed by empirical evidence. In this empirical comparison, SDV was expensive and identified random errors that made little impact on results and clinical conclusions of the trial. Central monitoring using an external data source was a more efficient approach for the primary outcome of OS. For the subjective outcome objective response, an independent blinded review committee and tracking system to monitor missing scan data could be more efficient than SDV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catrin Tudur Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Spooner D, Stocken DD, Jordan S, Bathers S, Dunn JA, Jevons C, Dodson L, Morrison JM, Oates GD, Grieve RJ. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate both the role and the optimal fractionation of radiotherapy in the conservative management of early breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012; 24:697-706. [PMID: 23036277 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2011] [Revised: 07/09/2012] [Accepted: 08/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Postoperative radiotherapy is routinely used in early breast cancer employing either 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions (long course) or 40 Gy in 15 daily fractions (short course). The role of radiotherapy and shorter fractionation regimens require validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with clinical stage I and II disease were randomised to receive immediate radiotherapy or delayed salvage treatment (no radiotherapy). Patients receiving radiotherapy were further randomised between long (50 Gy in 25 daily fractions) or short (40 Gy in 15 daily fractions) regimens. The primary outcome measure was time to first locoregional relapse. Reported results are at a median follow-up of 16.9 years (interquartile range 15.4-18.8). RESULTS In total, 707 women were recruited between 1985 and 1992: median age 59 years (range 28-80), 68% postmenopausal, median tumour size 2.0 cm (range 0.12-8.0); 271 patients have relapsed: 110 radiotherapy, 161 no radiotherapy. The site of first relapse was locoregional158 (64%) and distant 87 (36%). There was an estimated 24% reduction in the risk of any competing event (local relapse, distant relapse or death) with radiotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.65, 0.88). The benefit of radiotherapy treatment for all competing event types was statistically significant (X(Wald)(2) = 36.04, P < 0.001). Immediate radiotherapy reduced the risk of locoregional relapse by 62% (hazard ratio = 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.27, 0.53), consistent across prognostic subgroups. No differences were seen between either radiotherapy fractionation schedules. CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed better locoregional control for patients with early breast cancer receiving radiotherapy. A radiotherapy schedule of 40 Gy in 15 daily fractions is an efficient and effective regimen that is at least as good as the international conventional regimen of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Spooner
- The Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Stocken DD, Billingham LJ, Johnson PJ, Freemantle N. Choice of transformation for modelling non-linear continuous biomarkers. Trials 2011. [PMCID: PMC3287734 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-s1-a20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
47
|
Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, Ghaneh P, Cunningham D, Goldstein D, Padbury R, Moore MJ, Gallinger S, Mariette C, Wente MN, Izbicki JR, Friess H, Lerch MM, Dervenis C, Oláh A, Butturini G, Doi R, Lind PA, Smith D, Valle JW, Palmer DH, Buckels JA, Thompson J, McKay CJ, Rawcliffe CL, Büchler MW. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010; 304:1073-81. [PMID: 20823433 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 936] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Adjuvant fluorouracil has been shown to be of benefit for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine is known to be the most effective agent in advanced disease as well as an effective agent in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. OBJECTIVE To determine whether fluorouracil or gemcitabine is superior in terms of overall survival as adjuvant treatment following resection of pancreatic cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-3 trial, an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial conducted in 159 pancreatic cancer centers in Europe, Australasia, Japan, and Canada. Included in ESPAC-3 version 2 were 1088 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone cancer resection; patients were randomized between July 2000 and January 2007 and underwent at least 2 years of follow-up. INTERVENTIONS Patients received either fluorouracil plus folinic acid (folinic acid, 20 mg/m(2), intravenous bolus injection, followed by fluorouracil, 425 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus injection given 1-5 days every 28 days) (n = 551) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion once a week for 3 of every 4 weeks) (n = 537) for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measure was overall survival; secondary measures were toxicity, progression-free survival, and quality of life. RESULTS Final analysis was carried out on an intention-to-treat basis after a median of 34.2 (interquartile range, 27.1-43.4) months' follow-up after 753 deaths (69%). Median survival was 23.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1-25.0) months for patients treated with fluorouracil plus folinic acid and 23.6 (95% CI, 21.4-26.4) months for those treated with gemcitabine (chi(1)(2) = 0.7; P = .39; hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.81-1.08]). Seventy-seven patients (14%) receiving fluorouracil plus folinic acid had 97 treatment-related serious adverse events, compared with 40 patients (7.5%) receiving gemcitabine, who had 52 events (P < .001). There were no significant differences in either progression-free survival or global quality-of-life scores between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION Compared with the use of fluorouracil plus folinic acid, gemcitabine did not result in improved overall survival in patients with completely resected pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00058201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Neoptolemos
- Liverpool Cancer Research UK Cancer Trials Unit, Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Liverpool, Fifth Floor, UCD Bldg, Daulby Street, Liverpool, L69 3GA, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, Valle JW, Smith D, Steward W, Harper PG, Dunn J, Tudur-Smith C, West J, Falk S, Crellin A, Adab F, Thompson J, Leonard P, Ostrowski J, Eatock M, Scheithauer W, Herrmann R, Neoptolemos JP. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5513-8. [PMID: 19858379 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.24.2446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 550] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Both gemcitabine (GEM) and fluoropyrimidines are valuable treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. This open-label study was designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients randomly assigned to GEM alone or GEM plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas with a performance status <or= 2 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to GEM or GEM-CAP. The primary outcome measure was survival. Meta-analysis of published studies was also conducted. RESULTS Between May 2002 and January 2005, 533 patients were randomly assigned to GEM (n = 266) and GEM-CAP (n = 267) arms. GEM-CAP significantly improved objective response rate (19.1% v 12.4%; P = .034) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P = .004) and was associated with a trend toward improved OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .08) compared with GEM alone. This trend for OS benefit for GEM-CAP was consistent across different prognostic subgroups according to baseline stratification factors (stage and performance status) and remained after adjusting for these stratification factors (P = .077). Moreover, the meta-analysis of two additional studies involving 935 patients showed a significant survival benefit in favor of GEM-CAP (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.98; P = .02) with no intertrial heterogeneity. CONCLUSION On the basis of our trial and the meta-analysis, GEM-CAP should be considered as one of the standard first-line options in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cunningham
- Royal Marsden National HealthService (NHS) Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Carter R, Stocken DD, Ghaneh P, Bramhall SR, Olah A, Kelemen D, Bassi C, Friess H, Dervenis C, Spry N, Büchler MW, Neoptolemos JP. Longitudinal quality of life data can provide insights on the impact of adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer-Subset analysis of the ESPAC-1 data. Int J Cancer 2009; 124:2960-5. [PMID: 19330830 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC-1) study is the largest study of adjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to date and confirmed a survival advantage for adjuvant chemotherapy but not for chemoradiation. The importance of parallel evaluation of survival and quality of life (QoL) has been recognized as fundamental and the aim was to assess QoL and quality adjusted survival. A longitudinal QoL study on a subset of ESPAC-1 patients who prospectively completed the EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire during treatment and follow-up. An integrated quality-survival product method was used to adjust any treatment effect on survival by a function of measured QoL, calculated over a restricted 24-month-period (QALM-24). Three hundred and sixteen patients completed 1,201 questionnaires. There were no differences between treatment groups in dimension scores at baseline (randomization). For the chemotherapy group, the mean Quality Adjusted Life Months over 24 months (QALM-24) was 9.6 (95% CI: 8.7, 11.2) months compared with the mean QALM-24 of 8.6 (95% CI: 7.6, 10.5) months for the no chemotherapy group. For the chemoradiation group, the mean QALM-24 was 7.1 (95% CI: 6.0, 9.0) months compared with the mean QALM-24 of 8.1 (95% CI: 7.0, 10.0) months for the no chemoradiation group. The previously reported survival advantage supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy is maintained when adjusted using quality adjusted survival methodology. Chemotherapy provided on average an additional 1.0 quality-adjusted life months within a restricted 2-year time period from the time of resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross Carter
- Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wilson S, Taskila T, Ismail T, Stocken DD, Martin A, Redman V, Wakelam M, Perry I, Hobbs R. Establishing the added benefit of measuring MMP9 in FOB positive patients as a part of the Wolverhampton colorectal cancer screening programme. BMC Cancer 2009; 9:36. [PMID: 19175925 PMCID: PMC2639610 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2009] [Accepted: 01/28/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bowel cancer is common and a major cause of death. The NHS is currently rolling out a national bowel cancer screening programme that aims to cover the entire population by 2010. The programme will be based on the Faecal Occult Blood test (FOBt) that reduces mortality from colon cancer by 16%. However, FOB testing has a relatively low positive predictive value, with associated unnecessary cost, risk and anxiety from subsequent investigation, and is unacceptable to a proportion of the target population. Increased levels of an enzyme called matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) have been found to be associated with colorectal cancer, and this can be measured from a blood sample. MMP9 has potential for detecting those at risk of having colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess whether MMP9 estimation enhances the predictive value of a positive FOBt. Methods and design FOBt positive people aged 60–69 years attending the Wolverhampton NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Unit and providing consent for colonoscopy will be recruited. Participants will provide a blood sample prior to colonoscopy and permission for collection of the clinical outcome from screening unit records. Multivariate logistic regression analyses will determine the independent factors (patient and disease related, MMP9) associated with the prediction of neoplasia. Discussion Colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Pilot studies have confirmed the feasibility of the national cancer screening programme that is based on FOBt. However, the test has high false positive rates. MMP9 has significant potential as a marker for both adenomas and cancers. This study is to examine whether using MMP9 as an adjunct to FOBt improves the accuracy of screening and reduces the number of false positive tests that cause anxiety and require invasive and potentially harmful investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Wilson
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|