Predictors of survival of advanced renal cell carcinoma: long-term results from Southwest Oncology Group Trial S8949

Two is company, is three a crowd? Triplet therapy, novel molecular targets, and updates on the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to highlight the most recent changes in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma, a complicated and ever-changing field of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent meta-analysis examining combination therapy favors nivolumab plus cabozantinib as the overall survival leader in doublet therapy. Initial results on the first ever trial of triplet therapy have demonstrated improved progression-free survival over current standard of care. The hypoxia-inducible factor-2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor belzutifan is FDA approved for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and is currently being investigated in patients with nonhereditary renal cell carcinoma. The new glutamate synthesis inhibitor, telaglenastat, perhaps confers synergistic benefit when combined with everolimus, but combination with cabozantinib was not so effective. Dual mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with sapanisertib does not appear to be an effective therapeutic option. New biomarkers and targets are actively being investigated. Four recent trials examining alternative agents to pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting did not demonstrate an improvement in recurrence-free survival. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the combination therapy era is supported by retrospective data; clinical trials are recruiting patients.

SUMMARY

The last year ushered in novel approaches of varying success for managing advanced renal cell carcinoma, including triplet therapy, HIF-2α inhibitors, metabolic pathway inhibitors, and dual mTOR inhibitors. Pembrolizumab remains the only modern therapy available in the adjuvant setting, and the waters surrounding cytoreductive nephrectomy are still murky.

Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide recommendations for the management of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

METHODS

An Expert Panel conducted a systematic literature review to obtain evidence to guide treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel considered peer-reviewed reports published in English.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC should be made using tissue biopsy of the primary tumor or a metastatic site with the inclusion of markers and/or stains to support the diagnosis. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk criteria should be used to inform treatment. Cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to select patients with kidney-in-place and favorable- or intermediate-risk disease. For those who have already had a nephrectomy, an initial period of active surveillance may be offered if they are asymptomatic with a low burden of disease. Patients with favorable-risk disease who need systemic therapy may be offered an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); patients with intermediate or poor risk should be offered a doublet regimen (no recommendation was provided between ICIs or an ICI in combination with a VEGFR TKI). For select patients, monotherapy with either an ICI or a VEGFR TKI may be offered on the basis of comorbidities. Interleukin-2 remains an option, although selection criteria could not be identified. Recommendations are also provided for second- and subsequent-line therapy as well as the treatment of bone metastases, brain metastases, or the presence of sarcomatoid features. Participation in clinical trials is highly encouraged for patients with metastatic ccRCC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.

New Paradigms for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy

Simple Summary

Cytoreductive surgery (CS) is performed to remove the primary tumor in the setting of metastatic disease. In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment paradigm has evolved, adjusting to new changes in systemic therapy agents. In particular, immunotherapeutic agents, which utilize the body’s own immune system to attack cancerous cells, have improved over the past decade. Newer immunotherapy agents offer more effective treatments in mRCC, with the goal of more tolerable side effect profiles. However, now urologic and medical oncologists must reframe the role of CN in the context of these new systemic therapies. This review will discuss the current data on this topic as well as the historical context in which it is being studied.

Abstract

The role of CN in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been studied over the course of the past few decades. With the advent of immuno-oncologic (IO) agents, there has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of RCC. Within this new era of cancer care, the role of CN is unclear. There are several studies currently underway that aim to assess the role of CN in combination with these therapies. We reviewed articles examining CN, both historically and in the modern immunotherapy era. While immune-oncologic agents are relatively new and large clinical trials have yet to be completed, data thus far is promising that CN may provide clinical benefit. Multiple ongoing trials may clarify the role of CN in this new era of cancer care.

The value of cytoreductive nephrectomy on the survival of metastatic renal carcinoma patients based on the number of site-specific metastases

BACKGROUND

There has been significant uncertainty in the selection of candidates for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This report investigates the influence of site-specific metastases (bone, brain, liver, and lung) on the survival benefit of CN.

METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2014), 1113 mRCC patients treated with CN (n = 618) or no surgery (NS, n = 495) met the selection criteria. 168 pairs of patients using propensity scores were matched to balance the selection bias of undergoing CN. Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall survival (OS). Cases were subdivided to investigate the advantages of each procedure.

RESULTS

Before or after matching, CN led to better OS and lower CSM in Kaplan-Meier analysis. In matched cohort, decreased CSM after CN compared to without CN were consistently found in most subgroups stratified by age, T stage, and patients with ≤2 site-specific metastases. However, patients with ≥ 3 site-specific metastases, or patients with ≥cT3 stage combined with ≥ 2 site-specific metastases were not benefit from the cytoreductive nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential benefit of CN disappeared in patients with ≥ 3 site-specific metastases, or patients with ≥cT3 combined with ≥ 2 site-specific metastases.

Indications, complications, and outcomes following surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Surgery may set the basis for a potential cure or would provide the best achievable quality of life in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, survival extension with this approach would be scarce and not exempt from adverse events, thus preventing its recommendation in an already frail patient. An evidence based analysis on the role of surgery in each of the possible clinical scenarios involved under this heading may provide a clear picture on this issue and would be of value in the decision making process. Areas covered: Current literature was queried in PubMed/Medline in a systematic fashion. Manuscripts included were selected according to the quality of the data provided. A narrative review strategy was adopted to summarize the evidence acquired. Expert commentary: A surgery-based multimodal treatment approach should be strongly considered after adequate counseling in locally advanced and mRCC, since it may provide for additional benefits in terms of survival. However, a critical reevaluation of its adequacy, optimal timing, and selection of ideal candidates is currently ongoing.

Surgical Management of Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach

The past decade has seen a rapid proliferation in the number and types of systemic therapies available for renal cell carcinoma. However, surgery remains an integral component of the therapeutic armamentarium for advanced and metastatic kidney cancer. Cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant cytokine-based immunotherapy (predominantly high-dose interleukin 2) has largely given way to systemic-targeted therapies. Metastasectomy also has a role in carefully selected patients. Additionally, neoadjuvant systemic therapy may increase the feasibility of resecting the primary tumor, which may be beneficial for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Several prospective trials examining the role of adjuvant therapy are underway. Lastly, the first immune checkpoint inhibitor was approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 2015, providing a new treatment mechanism and new opportunities for combining systemic therapy with surgery. This review discusses current and historical literature regarding the surgical management of patients with advanced and mRCC and explores approaches for optimizing patient selection.

[Should cytoreductive nephrectomy be performed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and what is the scientific rationale?]

Between 15 and 20% of patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma suffer from metastatic disease by the time of diagnosis. In the immunotherapy era, the standard treatment was to perform cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by treatment with interferon α. This was based on two prospective randomized trials and their combined analysis. Since the introduction of targeted therapy, the use of CN came into question and the number of performed CN has declined. Two trials (CARMENA and SURTIME) evaluating the role of CN in the times of targeted therapy have either closed early or are recruiting slowly and will probably not be able to answer this question. Thus, we need to focus on retrospective data consisting of several analyses with large numbers of patients. These analyses all seem to show a benefit in overall survival, and adjusted for prognostic factors CN represents an independent predictor of longer survival. A correlation between expected life span and efficacy of CN has been shown with a survival rate that is three times higher after 3 years. Only patients with low performance status, low life expectancy, cerebral metastases, and old age did not benefit from CN. Furthermore, symptom control of large primary tumors without response to systemic therapy and the fact that all reports of long-term remission or long survival rates are associated with the use of CN are theoretical aspects speaking in favor of this treatment. This leads to the recommendation to perform CN in all patients with good performance status in all important guidelines.

Cytoreductive surgery in the era of targeted molecular therapy

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was regarded standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the immunotherapy era. With the advent of targeted molecular therapy (TMT) for the treatment of mRCC, the routine use of CN has been questioned. Up to date evidence continues to suggest that CN remains an integral part of treatment in appropriately selected patients. This review details the original context in which the efficacy of CN was established and rationale for the continued use of cytoreductive surgery in the era of TMT.

Surgical considerations for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 25-30% present with metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis. Despite the ever-increasing array of treatment options available for these patients, surgery remains one of the cornerstones of therapy. Proper patient selection for cytoreductive surgery is paramount to its effective use in the management of patients with metastatic RCC despite the decrease in reported morbidity rates. We explore the evolving role cytoreductive surgery in metastatic RCC spanning the immunotherapy era to the targeted therapy era. Despite significant advances in the management of patients with metastatic RCC, further evidence on the definitive role of cytoreductive surgery in the targeted therapy era is awaited through large randomized trials.

[Medical therapies for locally advanced/metastatic kidney cancer]

AIMS

To analyze the medical literature concerning the results of the international randomized muticentric trials concerning therapeutic innovations, mainly targeted therapies in locally advanced and or metastatic renal cell cancer and to evaluate the benefit of these TT.

METHODS

We performed a review of publications that concerned this topic published from 2000 to 2014.

RESULTS

They concerned the large randomized trials have showed a benefit of the targeted therapies in the treatment of clear cell carcinomas in terms of progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Advances in molecular biology have allowed the development of these targeted therapies that have all proved their role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Surgical management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been considered standard management for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for over a decade. This practice, based on evidence from the immunotherapy era, has now come into question with the dramatic shift in management of mRCC patients due to the development and approval of several targeted molecular therapies (TMT).

METHODS

A comprehensive English language literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed to identify articles and guidelines pertinent to CN in mRCC.

RESULTS

Retrospective studies have demonstrated improved survival for patients who underwent CN compared to those that did not; however, these studies suffer from heavy selection bias. Furthermore, the optimal timing of TMT, before or after surgery is not known. Pre-surgical TMT has the advantage of early treatment of metastases, downsizing of the primary, and may be an effective 'litmus test' for the selection of patients for CN based on response to TMT. The results of two ongoing phase III trials (CARMENA and SURTIME) will address much of the controversy on the role of CN and the timing of systemic therapy in the TMT era. In this review, we aim to present the evidence that lead to adoption of CN in the era of immunotherapies as well as the available data about the oncologic benefit of CN in patients with mRCC who receive TMT as their primary systemic therapy.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be an important role for CN in the era of TMT, mostly in patients with favorable risk and where a high percentage of tumor burden can be removed by cytoreductive surgery.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, genetics, and therapeutic modalities

The treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a major therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Despite advances in the understanding of the immunobiology of RCC and the availability of several novel targeted agents, there has been little improvement in the survival of patients with metastatic RCC. This review will focus on the recent understanding of risk factors and treatment options and outcomes of metastatic RCC, in particular, targeted therapeutic agents that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways. Prospective studies are required to determine whether sequential targeted therapy will further improve progression-free survival in RCC. Ongoing research to develop novel agents with better tolerability and enhanced efficacy in the treatment of metastatic RCC is required.

Selecting patients for cytoreductive nephrectomy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: who and when

Renal cell carcinoma presents with metastatic disease in approximately 30% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) of the primary tumor in the face of metastatic disease is part of a multimodality approach including systemic therapy that is based on evidence from randomized trials in the cytokine era. Data from the pretargeted therapy era showed that CN had a clear role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, increasing life expectancy by approximately 6 months. The substantial improvement in outcomes reported for targeted therapy has challenged the previous role of CN. However, despite the absence of data from Phase III trials, available evidence suggests that some patients may benefit substantially from CN in the era of targeted therapy. This review summarizes current arguments for CN and how to best select patients for surgery. Ongoing trials are key in generating evidence towards a personalized approach to debulking nephrectomy.

Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma

With the advent of targeted therapy for the treatment of metastatic renal cancer, the routine use of cytoreductive nephrectomy has been questioned. However, available data suggest that cytoreductive nephrectomy remains an integral part of treatment in properly selected patients. This review details the rationale for the continued use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in acceptable surgical candidates in the era of targeted therapy.

Early primary tumor size reduction is an independent predictor of improved overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sunitinib

BACKGROUND

In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with targeted agents and their primary tumor (PT) in situ, early PT decrease in size correlates with improved overall PT response, but the effect on overall survival (OS) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether early PT size reduction is associated with improved OS in patients with mRCC undergoing treatment with sunitinib.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We reviewed the clinical and radiographic data of all mRCC patients seen at our institution between January 2004 and December 2009 without prior systemic treatment who received sunitinib with their PT in situ.

MEASUREMENTS

Two independent reviewers measured the diameter of the PT and metastatic disease at baseline and subsequent scans to assess response. Early minor response was defined as ≥10% decrease within 60 d of treatment initiation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to calculate a hazard ratio (HR) corresponding to the risk of death based on clinical and pathologic factors as well as PT response.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We identified 75 consecutive patients with a median follow-up of 15 mo. All patients were intermediate or poor risk by common risk stratification systems. Median initial PT diameter was 9.7cm. Median maximum PT size reduction was -10.2% overall and -36.4% in patients who had early minor PT response. Median OS for patients without minor PT response, with minor PT response after 60 d, and with early minor PT response was 10.3, 16.5, and 30.2 mo, respectively. On multivariate analysis, early minor response was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR: 0.26; p=0.031). Other significant predictors included venous thrombus, multiple bone metastases, lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal, symptoms at presentation, and more than two metastatic sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Early minor PT response is associated with improved OS. Future studies should evaluate this prognostic factor to identify patients with prolonged OS.

Associations of serum alkaline phosphatase with metabolic syndrome and mortality

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest that elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels are associated with increased mortality, but the mechanisms for this association are unknown. As metabolic syndrome is associated with higher serum alkaline phosphatase levels, we examined the joint association of mortality with metabolic syndrome and serum alkaline phosphatase levels in the US general population.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of 15,234 adult participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to jointly relate mortality risk to serum alkaline phosphatase and indicators of metabolic syndrome.

RESULTS

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 14% to 41% among patients in lowest and higher quartiles, respectively, for baseline serum alkaline phosphatase. The mortality hazard ratio for each doubling of serum alkaline phosphatase was 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.72) adjusting only for demographic factors, and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.21-1.56) adjusting for both demographic and metabolic syndrome factors in the full cohort, and was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.36-2.46) adjusting for demographic factors in the subgroup without any of the component conditions of metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

In the US general population, higher levels of serum alkaline phosphatase is a predictor of mortality independent of the baseline prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Further studies are warranted to unravel the mechanisms of this association.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy vs medical therapy as initial treatment: a rational approach to the sequence question in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be considered as two distinct entities: localized and metastatic disease.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the scientific literature published within the past decade pertaining to cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic RCC.

RESULTS

Retrospective data and historical prospective series have demonstrated the survival benefit of debulking nephrectomy in well-selected RCC patients. New medical therapies, including vascular endothelial growth factor and mTOR pathway blocking drugs, are active biological agents, with survival improvement and potential regression of metastatic and primary tumors. Our current therapeutic challenge is the optimal integration of multimodal therapy consisting of systemic therapy and surgery including cytoreductive nephrectomy, debulking, and metastasectomy. Empiric data to guide this decision are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision concerning whether medical or surgical therapy should be the primary treatment approach selected must be made on an individual basis, taking into account patient performance status, clinical parameters, and physician expertise and recommendations, thus making each case a unique therapeutic challenge.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): Technological innovation and application in gynecologic oncology

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel form of noninvasive, highly conformal radiation treatment that delivers a high dose to tumor. The advantage of the technique resides in its ability to provide a high dose to tumor but spare normal tissues to an extent not previously possible. In this paper we will provide an introduction and review of this technology with regard to its use in gynecologic malignancies. Preliminary results from our experience are presented for the purpose of illustrating the range of SBRT applications in gynecologic oncology.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted and our experience from the past three years was reviewed.

RESULTS

Six case series are published that report results of SBRT for gynecologic malignancies. Sixteen gynecologic patients have been treated with SBRT at our institution. Treatment sites include pelvic and periaortic nodes (9 patients), oligometastatic disease (2), and cervical or endometrial primary tumors when other conventional external radiation or brachytherapy techniques were unsuitable (5). Preliminary follow-up at a median of 11 months (range, 0.3-33 months) demonstrates 79% locoregional control, 43% distant failure, and 50% overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT boosts to macroscopic periaortic node recurrences and other sites seem to provide local control and a possibility of long-term disease-free survival in carefully selected patients. Previously this had been difficult to achieve with conventional radiotherapy because of the proximity of periaortic nodes to small bowel. SBRT also offers a novel approach for minimally invasive treatment in the management of gynecological cancer where current surgical and radiotherapy techniques are unsuitable.

[Role of surgery (cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy) in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a literature review]

Cytoreductive nephrectomy is an established treatment option prior immunotherapy in well-selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With the recent introduction of new targeted agents, the role of surgery has been source of controversy. This review examines the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy during the immunotherapy era, then in the new targeted therapies era. This review also summarizes the optimal timing of these treatments, the prognostic factors predicting outcome following cytoreductive nephrectomy, the role of metastasectomy, partial and laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Use of systemic therapy and factors affecting survival for patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To present a multi-institutional experience evaluating the use of systemic therapy in patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), as prospective randomized trials showed a survival benefit for CN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy, and these data have been extrapolated to support CN in the era of targeted therapy, but the likelihood that patients with metastatic kidney cancer who undergo CN will receive systemic treatment afterward remains poorly defined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 141 patients who underwent CN between 1990 and 2008 were identified from our Institutional Kidney Cancer Registries. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models were used to assess the effect of clinicopathological and perioperative variables on patients' subsequent receipt of systemic therapy, and survival after CN.

RESULTS

Overall, 98 of the 141 patients (69.5%) received postoperative systemic treatment, at a median (range) of 2.5 (0.1-61.5) months after CN. In this group, 52 (53%) patients received immunotherapy, 34 (35%) targeted agents, and 12 (12%) other regimens. By contrast, 43 patients (31%) did not receive systemic therapy, because of rapid disease progression (13, 30%), decision for surveillance by medical oncology (nine, 21%), patient refusal (10, 23%), perioperative death (eight, 19%), and unknown reasons in three (7%). The median (range) survival after CN was 16.7 (0-120) months. The risk of death after surgery correlated with the number of metastatic sites (P = 0.012) and symptoms (P = 0.001) at presentation, poor performance status (P = 0.001), high tumour grade (P = 0.006), and presence of sarcomatoid features (P < 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Nearly a third of patients undergoing CN did not receive systemic treatment. While some were electively observed or declined therapy, others did not receive treatment due to rapidly progressive disease. Further investigation is warranted to identify those patients at highest risk of rapid postoperative disease progression who might benefit instead from an initial approach to treatment with systemic therapy.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic RCC in the era of targeted therapy

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has traditionally been associated with a poor prognosis with few effective treatments. In the multimodal treatment of metastatic RCC, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) became the standard of care after two randomized trials demonstrated a benefit in overall survival in patients who received CN prior to treatment with interferon. More recently, several agents (sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus and bevacizumab) have been developed that target angiogenesis and the cellular growth pathways involved in metastatic RCC. These targeted agents have demonstrated improved outcomes compared to cytokine therapy, and have transformed metastatic RCC treatment. Targeted agents are being used as a first-line systemic treatment in patients with metastatic RCC with unprecedented success, and many studies are now focusing on the role of CN in combination with these agents for patients with metastatic RCC.