The Number of Cores Positive for High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Initial Biopsy is Associated With Prostate Cancer on Second Biopsy

Physical Inactivity, Metabolic Syndrome and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Development of a Predicting Nomogram

Insufficient physical activity (PA) may be a shared risk factor for the development of both metabolic syndrome (MetS) and prostate cancer (PCa). To investigate this correlation and to develop a nomogram able to predict tumor diagnosis. Between 2016 and 2018, a consecutive series of men who underwent prostate biopsy at three institutions were prospectively enrolled. PA was self-assessed by patients through the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire; MetS was assessed according to Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. A logistic regression analyses was used to identify predictors of PCa diagnosis and high-grade disease (defined as International Society of Uro-Pathology grade >2 tumors). A nomogram was then computed to estimate the risk of tumor diagnosis. A total of 291 patients were enrolled; 17.5% of them (n = 51) presented with MetS. PCa was diagnosed in 110 (38%) patients overall while 51 presented high-grade disease. At multivariable analysis, age (OR 1.04; 95%CI: 1.00−1.08; p = 0.048), prostate volume (PV) (OR 0.98; 95%CI: 0.79−0.99; p = 0.004), suspicious digital rectal examination (OR 2.35; 95%CI: 1.11−4.98; p = 0.02), total PSA value (OR 1.12; 95%CI: 1.05−1.2; p < 0.001), and PASE score (OR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.98−0.99; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of tumor diagnosis. The latter two also predicted high-grade PCa. MetS was not associated with PCa diagnosis and aggressiveness. The novel nomogram displayed fair discrimination for PCa diagnosis (AUC = 0.76), adequate calibration (p > 0.05) and provided a net benefit in the range of probabilities between 20% and 90%. reduced PA was associated with an increased risk of PCa diagnosis and high-grade disease. Our nomogram could improve the selection of patients scheduled for prostate biopsy at increased risk of PCa.

The current recommendation for the management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the current predictive value of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in repeat biopsies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 293 men with isolated HGPIN detected in previous biopsies performed without multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and who underwent repeat biopsy within 1 to 3 years, was analysed. Pre-repeat biopsy mpMRI and guided biopsies to suspicious lesions (Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] ≥3) and/or and systematic biopsies were performed. Persistent prostate cancer (PCa) suspicion, defined as sustained serum prostate-specific antigen level >4 ng/mL and/or abnormal digital rectal examination, was present in 248 men (84.6%), and was absent in 45 men (15.4%). A control group of 190 men who had no previous HGPIN, atypical small acinar proliferation or HGPIN with atypia who were scheduled to undergo repeat biopsy due to persistent PCa suspicion were also analysed. csPCa was defined as tumours of Grade Group ≥2.

RESULTS

In the subset of 45 men with isolated HGPIN, in whom PCa suspicion disappeared, only one csPCa (2.2%) and one insignificant PCa (iPCa) were detected. csPCa was detected in 34.7% of men with persistent PCa suspicion and previous HGPIN, and in 28.4% of those without previous HGPIN (P =0.180). iPCa was detected in 12.1% and 6.3%, respectively (P =0.039). Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of csPCa detection was not predicted by previous HGPIN: odds ratio (OR) 1.369 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.894-2.095; P =0.149); however, previous HGPIN increased the risk of iPCa detection: OR 2.043 (95% CI 1.016-4.109; P =0.006).

CONCLUSION

The risk of csPCa in men with isolated HGPIN, in whom PCa suspicion disappears, is extremely low. Moreover, in those men in whom PCa suspicion persists, the risk of csPCa is not influenced by the previous finding of HGPIN. However, previous HGPIN increases the risk of iPCa detection. Therefore, repeat prostate biopsy should not be recommended solely because of a previous HGPIN.

The role of immune PSA complex (iXip) in the prediction of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To analyse the performance of iXip in the prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) and high-grade PCa.

METHODS

A consecutive series of men undergoing MRI/FUSION prostate biopsies were enrolled in one centre. Indications for prostate biopsy included abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (PSA > 4 ng/ml) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or abnormal MRI. All patients underwent the evaluation of serum PSA-IgM concentration and the iXip ratio was calculated. Accuracy iXip for the prediction of PCa was evaluated using multivariable binary regression analysis and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Overall 160 patients with a median age of 65 (62/73) years were enrolled. Overall, 42% patients were diagnosed with PCa and 75% of them had high-grade cancer (Epstein ≥ 3). Patients with PCa were older and presented higher PSA levels, higher PIRADS scores and lower prostate volumes (PVs). On ROC analysis iXip presented an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.57 in the prediction of PCa and of 0.54 for the prediction of high-grade PCa.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, immune PSA complexes are not predictors of PCa. iXip analysis should not be included in the diagnostic pathway of patients at increased risk of PCa.

Precursor Lesions of Urologic Malignancies

CONTEXT

- Precursor lesions of urologic malignancies are established histopathologic entities, which are important not only to recognize for clinical purposes, but also to further investigate at the molecular level in order to gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis of these malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

- To provide a brief overview of precursor lesions to the most common malignancies that develop within the genitourinary tract with a focus on their clinical implications, histologic features, and molecular characteristics.

DATA SOURCES

- Literature review from PubMed, urologic pathology textbooks, and the 4th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. All photomicrographs were taken from cases seen at Weill Cornell Medicine or from the authors' personal slide collections.

CONCLUSIONS

- The clinical importance and histologic criteria are well established for the known precursor lesions of the most common malignancies throughout the genitourinary tract, but further investigation is warranted at the molecular level to better understand the pathogenesis of these lesions. Such investigation may lead to better risk stratification of patients and potentially novel treatments.

The impact of African American race on prostate cancer detection on repeat prostate biopsy in a veteran population

PURPOSE

Racial differences in the incidence of prostate cancer on initial biopsy are well established, but the predictive value of African American race on the probability of prostate cancer detection on repeat biopsy is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At a single institution between January 2007 and June 2014, we reviewed 277 men who first underwent a negative transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate, and who then subsequently underwent a second biopsy. Detection rates were compared via Chi-square analysis. Race, age, PSA, presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, presence of atypical small acinar proliferation, prostate volume, PSA velocity and PSA density were compared via a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

496 AA men and 352 Caucasian men underwent initial biopsy, and AA men had a 49 % cancer detection rate, compared to 34 % in Caucasians (p < 0.0001). AA men also had a greater incidence of Gleason 7 cancers (p = 0.00018) and a smaller mean TRUS volume (p = 0.006) compared to Caucasians. On repeat biopsy, AA men no longer had a higher cancer detection rate (p = 0.227), nor difference in Gleason 7 detection or TRUS volume (p = 0.0992). On initial biopsy, AA race and increasing PSA were both associated with an increased likelihood for cancer detection (p < 0.001 for both). After an initial negative biopsy, AA race no longer predicted for future malignancy detection (p = 0.57), nor did PSA (p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of men with high pre-test probability of prostate cancer and an initial negative biopsy, African American race in a veteran population fails to predict the detection of future prostate cancer.

Metabolic syndrome diagnosis and widespread high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia significantly increase prostate cancer risk: results from a multicenter biopsy study

Background

To test in multicenter setting if patients affected of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and initial widespread high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (wHGPIN) diagnosis are at higher risk of prostate cancer (PCa) on repeat biopsy.

Methods

Patients clinical charts from three European Academic Hospital were reviewed in order to identify patients with initial diagnosis of HGPIN undergone to repeat biopsy. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were adopted to minimize patient heterogeneity. MetS was defined according to Word Heart Organization criteria while initial wHGPIN when ≥4 cores biopsy were involved. A multivariate logistic model was computed to assess the association between PCa and clinical-pathological variables.

Results

Overall 283 patients were scheduled. Median age was 67 years (IQR 62–72). MetS was diagnosed in 116/283 (41 %) patients and PCa was detected in 84/283 (29.7 %) patients.

In particular, PCa was more frequently diagnosed in patients affected of wHGPIN and MetS (45/86, 52.3 %) than in patients with wHGPIN and normal metabolic profile (28/95, 29.5 %), p = 0.002. The multivariate logistic model confirmed that wHGPIN and MetS are independent risk factors for following PCa diagnosis, respectively OR 2.4 (95 % CI 1.01–5.71, p = 0.04), OR 2.79 (95 % CI 1.49–5.22, p = 0.01) while total PSA and DRE findings are not able to predict PCa at repeat biopsy, OR 1.05 (95 % CI 0.98–1.03 p = 0.69) and OR 1.01 (95 % CI 0.55–1.84, p = 0.96) respectively.

Conclusions

wHGPIN is positively associated to PCa; assessing metabolic profile and repeat prostate biopsy is advisable in patients with initial diagnosis of wHGPIN.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2085-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Metabolic abnormalities linked to an increased cardiovascular risk are associated with high-grade prostate cancer: a single biopsy cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Smoking, hypertension, abdominal obesity and metabolic abnormalities have been considered individual factors involved in prostate cancer (PCa) pathogenesis. All of these factors are used to define the individual cardiovascular risk (CVR). The aim of our study was to evaluate the association between CVR and PCa diagnosis and grade among a consecutive series of men undergoing prostate biopsy.

METHODS

From 2010 onwards, consecutive patients undergoing 12-core prostate biopsy were enrolled. Body mass index was measured before the biopsy. Blood samples were collected and tested for: PSA, fasting glucose, triglycerides and high-density lipoproteins. Blood pressure was also recorded. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel III and CVR according to the European Association of Cardiologist Guidelines. We evaluated the association between CVR and PCa biopsy Gleason score using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-four patients were enrolled. Four hundred and six patients (70%) presented a moderate/high CVR. Two hundred and thirty-seven (40.6%) patients had cancer on biopsy; 157 with moderate/high CVR and 80 with low/no CVR (P=0.11). Out of the 237 patients with PCa, 113 had a Gleason score 6 and 124 a Gleason score ⩾7. Out of them, 92/124 (75%) presented a moderate/high CVR (P=0.004). Moderate/high CVR was not associated with an increased risk of PCa (odds ratio (OR): 0.741, confidence interval (CI): 0.474-1.156; P=0.186) but with an increased risk of Gleason score ⩾7 (OR: 2.154, CI: 1.076-4.314; P=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, a moderate/high CVR is associated with an increased risk of a high-grade Gleason score when PCa is diagnosed on biopsy. Although these results should be confirmed in multicentre studies, patients with moderate/high CVR should be carefully evaluated for PCa diagnosis.

Physical activity as a risk factor for prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective biopsy cohort analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between physical activity, evaluated by the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire, and prostate cancer risk in a consecutive series of men undergoing prostate biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From 2011 onwards, consecutive men undergoing 12-core prostate biopsy were enrolled into a prospective database. Indications for a prostatic biopsy were a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value of ≥4 ng/mL and/or a positive digital rectal examination. Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumferences were measured before the biopsy. Fasting blood samples were collected before biopsy and tested for: total PSA, glucose, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and trygliceride levels. Blood pressure was recorded. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined according to the Adult Treatment panel III. The PASE questionnaire was completed before the biopsy.

RESULTS

In all, 286 patients were enrolled with a median (interquartile range, IQR) age and PSA level of 68 (62-74) years and 6.1 (5-8.8) ng/mL, respectively. The median (IQR) BMI was 26.4 (24.6-29) kg/m(2) and waist circumference was 102 (97-108) cm, with 75 patients (26%) presenting with MetS. In all, 106 patients (37%) had prostate cancer at biopsy. Patients with prostate cancer had higher PSA levels (median [IQR] 6.7 [5-10] vs 5.6 [4.8-8] ng/mL; P = 0.007) and lower LogPASE scores (median [IQR] 2.03 [1.82-2.18] vs 2.10 [1.92-2.29]; P = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, in addition to well-recognised risk factors such as age, PSA level and prostate volume, LogPASE score was an independent risk factor for prostate cancer diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 0.146, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.037-0.577; P = 0.006]. LogPASE score was also an independent predictor of high-grade cancer (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.006-0.764; P = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

In our single-centre study, increased physical activity, evaluated by the PASE questionnaire, is associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer and of high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy. Further studies should clarify the molecular pathways behind this association.

[Distribution of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and associated lesions in the cancer foci on radical prostatectomy specimens]

OBJECTIVE

The distribution of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and other intraductal lesions associated with IDC-P was evaluated in the cancer foci on radical prostatectomy specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed slide in 412 cases treated by radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Mapping study was performed with regard to IDC-P, other intraductal lesions associated with IDC-P and invasive carcinoma.

RESULTS

We identified 98 cases (23.8%) and 102 cancer foci associated with IDC-P. In these all cancer foci, IDC-P was associated with invasive carcinoma and other intraductal neoplastic lesions with tufting, micropapillary and loose cribriform patterns were contiguous and admixed with IDC-P in 83 cancer foci (81.4%). There were lesions with invasive carcinoma around the IDC-P in 95 cancer foci (93.1%) and lesions without invasive carcinoma around IDC-P in 66 foci (64.7%). The latter lesions existed in the marginal areas of the cancer foci in 63 (61.8%) and in the central areas of the cancer foci in 14 (13.7%). In 5 cancer foci (4.9%), volume of IDC-P was larger than that of invasive carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of IDC-P with dense cribriform and solid patterns varied in cancer foci, and intraductal lesions with tufting, micropapillary and loose cribriform patterns were frequently seen in area contiguous and admixed with IDC-P. The latter lesion may be low grade morphology of IDC-P, although the lesions could not be distinguished from high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Serum levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) are not predictive of prostate cancer diagnosis and aggressiveness: results from an Italian biopsy cohort

PURPOSE

To explore the association between serum levels of Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) and the risk of developing prostate cancer (PCa) as well as high grade disease in men undergoing prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2012, we prospectively enrolled 740 patients with no history of PCa undergoing prostate biopsy. Before biopsy general data of the patient DRE, PSA and BMI were recorded. The risk of detecting cancer and high grade cancer was assessed as a function of SHBG using crude and adjusted logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Serum levels of SHBG were not associated with an increased risk of PCa or high grade disease. Age (OR 1.027 95% CI 1.003-1.052 p = 0.027), DRE (OR 3.391 95% CI 2.258-5.092 p = 0.000) and PSA (OR 1.078 95% CI 1.037-1.120 p = 0.000) were found to be independent predictors of prostate cancer risk. Age (OR 1.051 95% CI 1.009-1.095 p = 0.016), DRE (OR 2.519 95% CI 1.384-4.584 p = 0.000), BMI (OR 1.098 95% CI 1.011-1.193 p = 0.027) and PSA (OR 1.074 95% CI 1.014-1.137 p = 0.015) were found to be independent predictors of high grade disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of patients, serum levels of SHBG are not predictive of PCa or high grade disease. According to our experience SHBG should not be considered a biomarker in PCa diagnosis neither a marker for high grade disease.

Preneoplasia in the prostate gland with emphasis on high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

There are a variety of morphological patterns and processes that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), inflammation with or without atrophy, and adenosis (atypical adenomatous hyperplasia) have all been given candidate status as precursor lesions of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Based on decades of research, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HPIN), a proliferative lesion of prostatic secretory cells, has emerged as the most likely morphological pre-invasive lesion involved in the evolution of many but not all prostatic adenocarcinomas. In this manuscript, we briefly discuss other proposed precursors of prostatic adenocarcinoma and then focus on the history, diagnostic criteria and morphology of HPIN. The incidence of HPIN and its relationship to prostate cancer is reviewed. The differential diagnosis of large glandular patterns in the prostate is discussed in depth. Finally, we summarise the recent clinicopathological studies evaluating the clinical significance of HPIN and discuss follow-up strategies in men diagnosed with HPIN.

Serum levels of 17-β-estradiol are not predictive of prostate cancer diagnosis and aggressiveness: results from an Italian biopsy cohort

OBJECTIVES

To explore the association between serum levels of 17-β-estradiol (17BE) and prostate cancer (PCa) risk in men undergoing prostate biopsy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2006 and 2012, we prospectively enrolled 894 patients, with no history of PCa, undergoing prostate biopsy. Before biopsy was performed, general data, digital rectal examination (DRE), body mass index, 17BE, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were recorded. The risk of detecting cancer and high-grade cancer was assessed as a function of 17BE using crude and adjusted logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Serum levels of 17BE were not associated with an increased risk of PCa or high-grade disease. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.07; P = 0.000), DRE(OR 2.81; 95% CI: 1.98-4.00; P = 0.000), and PSA(OR 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04-1.10; P = 0.000) were found to be independent predictors of PCa risk. Age (OR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.09; P = 0.007), DRE (OR 3.04; 95% CI: 1.79-5.17; P = 0.000), body mass index (OR 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.150; P = 0.040), and PSA (OR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12; P = 0.000) were found to be independent predictors of high-grade disease.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of patients, serum levels of 17BE are not predictive of PCa or high-grade disease. In patients at risk of PCa, 17BE should not be considered a reliable marker to predict poorly differentiated PCa in the setting of initial prostate biopsy.

Patients with metabolic syndrome and widespread high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia are at a higher risk factor of prostate cancer on re-biopsy: a prospective single cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that patients with widespread high grade prostatic intra epithelial neoplasia (wHGPIN) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are at a higher risk of prostate cancer (PCa) at a repeat biopsy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We prospectively evaluated 161 patients submitted from December 2004 to December 2011 to prostate rebiopsy after a initial diagnosis of HGPIN in a tertiary academic center. A 12 core biopsy template was used for all the biopsies. Rebiopsy was performed six months after the initial biopsy independently from PSA level and the DRE finding. wHGPIN was defined as≥4 biopsy cores involved. MetS was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III criteria.

RESULTS

Overall, 64 patients (39.7%) presented wHGPIN and 97 isolated HGPIN (60.3%). MetS was found in 63 patients, 39.1% of the whole population. Out of them 16 (25.3%) and 47 (74.7%) patients had a diagnosis of isolated and wHGPIN (P = 0.001). PCa detection rate at repeat biopsy was significantly higher in patients with MetS and wHGPIN than in those with wHGPIN and no MetS (57.4% Vs 23.5%; P = 0.016). A logistic regression model confirmed that wHGPIN and MetS are independent risk factors of prostate cancer diagnosis (respectively: Odds ratio (OR) = 4.187, 95%CI: 1.65-10.57 p = 0.002 and OR=3.603, 95%CI: 1.41-9.19, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Patients with MetS and wHGPIN are at a higher risk of PCa, therefore performing a new prostate biopsy in those patients should be recommended.

The impact of obesity on the predictive accuracy of PSA in men undergoing prostate biopsy

PURPOSE

Obese men have been reported to have lower serum PSA values relative to normal-weight men in population-based studies, screening cohorts, and in men with prostate cancer (CaP) treated with surgery. There are concerns that PSA may be less accurate in detecting prostate cancer in men with increased body mass index (BMI). We determine whether the diagnostic potential of PSA is negatively influenced by obesity by comparing its operating characteristics across BMI categories among men undergoing prostate biopsy.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data on 917 men who underwent trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy from 2002 to 2010 at a University hospital in Italy were used in the study. Men were categorized for BMI as follows: <25 kg/m(2) (normal weight), 25-29.9 kg/m(2) (overweight), and ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (obese). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess PSA accuracy for predicting prostate cancer overall and then stratified according to digital rectal examination (DRE) findings using the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The obesity rate of the study cohort was 21 %. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall AUCs of PSA for predicting CaP among normal-weight (AUC = 0.56), overweight (AUC = 0.60), and obese men (AUC = 0.60; p = 0.68) in either DRE-positive or negative men.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of Italian men undergoing prostate biopsy, the performance accuracy of PSA as a predictor of CaP is not significantly altered by BMI. Obesity does not negatively impact the overall ability of PSA to discriminate between CaP and benign conditions.

In situ and intraductal epithelial proliferations of prostate: definitions and treatment implications. Part 1: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? In the era of extended biopsy sampling of the prostate, multifocal high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is associated with a significantly higher rate of cancer diagnosis than unifocal HGPIN or a benign diagnosis. In addition, the cancers that are subsequently diagnosed in men with HGPIN on their initial biopsy tend to be smaller, lower grade and more commonly organ-confined. This has led to a reappraisal of the need and timing of repeat biopsies. The present paper provides a series of recommendations on the optimal timing of repeat biopsies in men with HGPIN on biopsy, based on the current available evidence. This is the first of a two part series reviewing the nature and clinical significance of in situ cellular proliferations in the prostate gland. This first part examines prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), while the second part in the next supplement discusses intraductal carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. PIN is a precursor lesion in the development of some forms of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In the 1990 s, high-grade PIN (HGPIN) on biopsy was a significant predictor of carcinoma, but this was due to incomplete sampling with sextant biopsies. With more extensive sampling in the last decade, the likelihood of identifying cancer after a diagnosis of HGPIN is not significantly different from a benign diagnosis. In several recent studies, it is now recognised that multifocal HGPIN is a better predictor of cancer than unifocal HGPIN. Most cases of cancer will be detected in the vicinity of the HGPIN, but up to 40% of cancers will occur in different sextants. In assessing potential markers for carcinoma in men with HGPIN on biopsy, α-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool. HGPIN with strong staining for AMACR is associated with a higher rate of cancer detection in subsequent biopsies compared with AMACR-negative HGPIN. Also, AMACR positivity in HGPIN is more commonly seen adjacent to carcinoma, and this may provide guidance as to the site of future biopsies.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) has been established as a precursor to prostatic adenocarcinoma. HGPIN shares many morphological, genetic, and molecular signatures with prostate cancer. Its predictive value for the development of future adenocarcinoma during the prostate-specific antigen screening era has decreased, mostly owing to the increase in prostate biopsy cores. Nevertheless, a literature review supports that large-volume HGPIN and multiple cores of involvement at the initial biopsy should prompt a repeat biopsy of the prostate within 1 year. No treatment is recommended for HGPIN to slow its progression to cancer.

Type of transrectal ultrasonography probe influences prostate cancer detection rates on repeat prostate biopsy

It is known that the end-fire probe detects more prostate cancer on initial prostate biopsy, but there is no literature looking at the influence of type of probe on repeat biopsy. Given that the literature on the influence of ultrasonography probe on repeat prostate biopsy is non-existent, the present study adds information which may help urologists improve their chances of detecting prostate cancer on prostate biopsy. Determining which type of probe to use on a prostate biopsy is a simple external factor that may help improve patient management.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the type of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) probe used during repeat prostate biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 680 men undergoing repeat prostate biopsy at our institution between 2000 and 2010. Patient mean (range) age was 64.2 (39-95) years. The median (range) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 5.5 (0.37-33.8) ng/mL and median (range) free PSA was 17 (5-45) %. Patient age, PSA, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, time interval between initial and repeat biopsy, digital rectal examination and pathological findings were all included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The use of an end-fire probe on repeat biopsy significantly increased prostate cancer detection (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.46). The time interval between 1(st) and 2(nd) biopsy was also significant (OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.09). On univariate analysis, white race (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.99), increasing prostate volume (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89), and higher free PSA (OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.84) were associated with a decreased risk of cancer. When evaluating the different permutations of using an end-fire or side-fire probe on initial or repeat biopsy, there was no difference in prostate cancer detection regardless of order of use of an end-fire or side-fire probe.

CONCLUSIONS

An end-fire probe is associated with improved prostate cancer detection rates on both initial and repeat biopsy. The order of probe use does not appear to matter.

Metabolic syndrome is associated with high grade Gleason score when prostate cancer is diagnosed on biopsy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome (MS) and prostate cancer diagnosis and grade in patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

METHODS

From 2009 onwards, a consecutive series of patients undergoing 12-core prostate biopsy for PSA value ≥4 ng/ml and/or positive digital rectal examination (DRE) were prospectively enrolled. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumferences, and blood pressure were measured before the biopsy. Blood samples were tested for: PSA, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol HDL. MS presence was defined according to Adult Treatment Panel III criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety five patients were enrolled with a median age and PSA of 69 years and 5.6 ng/ml respectively. Median BMI was 27.6 kg/m(2) with 64 patients (33%) being classified as obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) ). Eighty-six patients (44%) had MS. Eighty-three patients (43%) had cancer on biopsy; 37 (45%) with MS and 46 (55%) without (P = 0.48). PSA was independently associated with higher risk of cancer (OR 1.12/1 U PSA, P = 0.01). Out of 83 patients with prostate cancer, 42 (51%) had Gleason score 6 (12 (28.5%) presented a MS) and 41 (49%) a Gleason score ≥7 (25 (61%) presented a MS). The presence of MS was not associated with an increased risk prostate cancer (OR: 0.97, P = 0.94) but with an increased risk of Gleason ≥7 (OR: 3.82; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

In our single center study, MS is associated with an increased risk of high grade Gleason score when prostate cancer is diagnosed on biopsy. However, these results should be confirmed in a larger multicenter study. .

Diagnosis of isolated high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia: proposal of a nomogram for the prediction of cancer detection at saturation re-biopsy

Study Type--Diagnostic (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? And what does the study add? Multifocality, age, PSA values, and biopsy protocols regarding the predictive value of high grade PIN have been discussed extensively in the literature. Our study developed for the first time a predictive nomogram that could be helpful for patient counselling and to guide the urologist to perform rPBX after an initial diagnosis of isolated HGPIN.

OBJECTIVE

• To evaluate factors that may predict prostate cancer (PCa) detection after the initial diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on prostate biopsy (PBx) with six to 24 random cores.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• We retrospectively evaluated 262 patients submitted from 1998 to 2007 to prostate re-biopsy (rPBx) after an initial HGPIN diagnosis in tertiary academic centres. • HGPIN diagnosis was obtained on initial systematic PBx with six to 24 random cores. • All patients were re-biopsied with a 'saturation' rPBx with 20-26 cores, with a median time to rPBx of 12 months. • All slides were reviewed by expert uropathologists.

RESULTS

• Plurifocal HGPIN (pHGPIN) was found in 115 patients and monofocal HGPIN (mHGPIN) was found in 147 patients. • In total, 108 and 154 patients, respectively, were submitted to >12-core initial PBx and ≤12-core initial PBx. • Overall PCa detection at rPBx was 31.7%. PSA level (7.7 vs 6.6 ng/mL; P= 0.031) and age (68 vs 64 years; P= 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with PCa at rPBx. • PCa detection was significantly higher in patients with a ≤12-core initial PBx than in those with a >12-core initial PBx (37.6% vs 23.1%; P= 0.01), as well as in patients with pHGPIN than in those with mHGPIN (40% vs 25.1%; P= 0.013). • At multivariable analysis, PSA level (P= 0.041; hazards ratio, HR, 1.08), age (P < 0.001; HR, 1.09), pHGPIN (P= 0.031; HR, 1.97) and ≤12-core initial PBx (P= 0.012; HR, 1.95) were independent predictors of PCa detection. • A nomogram including these four variables achieved 72% accuracy for predicting PCa detection after an initial HGPIN diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

• PCa detection on saturation rPBx after an initial diagnosis of HGPIN is significantly higher in patients with a ≤12-core initial PBx than those with a >12-core initial PBx and in patients with pHGPIN than in those with mHGPIN. • We developed a simple prognostic tool for the prediction of PCa detection in patients with initial HGPIN diagnosis who were undergoing saturation rPBx.

The optimal rebiopsy prostatic scheme depends on patient clinical characteristics: results of a recursive partitioning analysis based on a 24-core systematic scheme

BACKGROUND

The most beneficial number and the location of prostate biopsies remain matters of debate, especially after an initial negative biopsy.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal combination of sampling sites (number and location) to detect prostate cancer (PCa) in patients previously submitted to an initial negative prostatic biopsy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic 24-core prostate biopsy (24PBx) was performed prospectively in 340 consecutive patients after a first negative biopsy (at least 12 cores).

MEASUREMENTS

We relied on a classification and regression tree analysis to identify three clinically different subgroups of patients at dissimilar risk of harboring PCa at second biopsy. Subsequently, we set the cancer-positive rate of the 24PBx at 100% and calculated PCa detection rates for 255 possible combinations of sampling sites. We selected the optimal biopsy scheme (defined as the combination of sampling sites that detected 95% of all the cancers with the minimal number of biopsy cores) for each patient subgroup.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

After an initial negative biopsy, cancer was detected at rebiopsy in 95 men (27.9%). At a given number of cores, the cancer detection rates varied significantly according to the different combination of sites considered. Three different PCa risk groups were identified: (1) previous report of atypical small acinar proliferation of the prostate (ASAP), (2) no previous ASAP and ratio of free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) to total PSA (%fPSA) ≤10%, and (3) no previous ASAP and %fPSA >10%. For patients with previous ASAP or patients with no previous ASAP and %fPSA ≤10%, two schemes with different combinations of 14 cores were most favorable. The optimal sampling in patients with no previous ASAP and %fPSA >10% was a scheme with a combination of 20 cores.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the number and the location of biopsy cores taken affect cancer detection rates in a repeated biopsy setting. We developed an internally validated flowchart to identify the most advantageous set of sampling sites according to patient characteristics.

Screening for Prostate Cancer by Digital Rectal Examination and PSA Determination in Senegal

Objectives. The goal of our study was to investigate the prevalence of prostate cancer in an unselected population of Senegalese men. Patients and Methods. We conducted the study over two years (2008 and 2009) on an unselected population of 572 Senegalese men, aged 35 and older. The following parameters have been investigated: the subject's age, the presence or absence of urination disorders, the family's history of prostate cancer or prostate surgery, the aspects of the prostate on digital rectal examination (DRE), the total PSA level, and the outcomes of the prostate biopsies. Data entry was performed with Epi Info 6 software and was analyzed and recorded using Excel software. We performed mean and frequency calculations. Results. The mean age of our patients was 65.5 years, with extremes of 38 and 93 years. Age groups from 50 to 59 and from 60 to 69 were the most represented. DRE was normal in the age group from 35 to 39, and only one patient in the age group from 40 to 49 had a prostate nodule. PSA level was greater than or equal to 4 ng/mL in 66 cases. A total of 5.4% patients had a PSA level greater than or equal to 10 ng/mL. Only two patients in the age group from 40 to 49 had a PSA level greater than 4 ng/mL. Of the 72 biopsies we performed, prostatic adenocarcinoma was found in 30.6% of the cases. It is the only type of prostate cancer we found in our series. The cases of prostate cancer were mostly observed in the age groups from 60 to 69 and from 70 to 79. No cases were detected for ages younger than 50. DRE gave indications of possible adenocarcinoma in 27.30% cases. Its sensitivity was 27%, while its positive predictive value was estimated at 35%. Of all positive biopsies, 4.5% had a PSA level between 0 and 3.9 ng/mL. In this case, the sensitivity of PSA was 95.5%, and the positive predictive value was 31.8%. High-grade intraepithelial neoplasiae were observed in 21 cases. Conclusion. Prostate cancer is frequent in Senegal, and screening remains the best way for early diagnosis.

Predicting prostate cancer at rebiopsies in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a study on 546 patients

The aim of this study was to analyse the factors that predict the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) after high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Data from 546 patients with HGPIN submitted up to a 6-month series of three rebiopsies, according to an institutional protocol, were reviewed. PCa has been found in 174 cases (31.8%), in 116 cases at the first and in 58 cases at a further rebiopsy. The risk of finding PCa at the first rebiopsy was correlated with the PSA value and with an anomalous digital rectal examination (DRE) at the time of the initial biopsy; the risk at a subsequent rebiopsy was correlated to the number of cores with HGPIN, with a cutoff of four, and to the ratio with the total number of cores ('PIN density'), with a cutoff of 50%, at the time of initial biopsy. A tailored protocol of controls can be suggested: (a) higher PSA value and/or anomalous DRE: early extended or saturation rebiopsy; (b) number of cores with HGPIN ≥4 and/or PIN density ≥50%: delayed rebiopsy; and (c) no risk factors: PSA and DRE controls.

Prostate cancer does not influence androgen levels: a radical prostatectomy cohort study

AIM

To investigate the relationship between androgens and prostate cancer in patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients scheduled for open radical prostatectomy were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before prostate biopsy and 12 months later to evaluate testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), PSA, calculated free and bioavailable testosterone.

RESULTS

44 patients were consecutively enrolled. 15 patients (34%) presented a Gleason score (GS) of 6, 24 patients GS 7 (54%), 1 patient (2%) GS 8, and 4 patients GS 9 (9%). Mean prostate cancer volume was 4.3 ± 5.7 cm(3). 24 patients presented a pT2 stage, 16 a pT3a stage, and 4 a pT3b stage. Positive surgical margins were detected in 12 patients (27.3%). No significant change of testosterone (4.21 ± 1.49 vs. 4.00 ± 1.48 ng/ml, p = 0.46), free testosterone (9.01 ± 3.64 vs. 8.85 ± 3.04 pg/ml, p = 0.83), SHBG (38 ± 14.39 vs. 38.5 ± 17.23 nmol/l, p = 0.71), calculated free testosterone (0.091 ± 0.13 vs. 0.067 ± 0.026, p = 0.563), and bioavailable testosterone (1.89 ± 0.722 vs. 1.88 ± 0.53, p = 0.912) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-center study, prostate cancer does not impact on serum androgen levels, however our results should be confirmed in a larger study.

Beyond diagnosis: evolving prostate biopsy in the era of focal therapy

Despite decades of use as the “gold standard” in the detection of prostate cancer, the optimal biopsy regimen is still not universally agreed upon. While important aspects such as the need for laterally placed biopsies and the importance of apical cancer are known, repeated studies have shown significant patients with cancer on subsequent biopsy when the original biopsy was negative and an ongoing suspicion of cancer remained. Attempts to maximise the effectiveness of repeat biopsies have given rise to the alternate approaches of saturation biopsy and the transperineal approach. Recent interest in focal treatment of prostate cancer has further highlighted the need for accurate detection of prostate cancer, and in response, the introduction of transperineal template-guided biopsy. While the saturation biopsy approach and the transperineal template approach increase the detection rate of cancer in men with a previous negative biopsy and appear to have acceptable morbidity, there is a lack of clinical trials evaluating the different biopsy strategies. This paper reviews the evolution of prostatic biopsy and current controversies.

Which Factors allow to Anticipate the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Pin Patients? A Study on 546 Patients

Aim of the study

TO analyze which factors allow to assess the risk of finding a prostate cancer (PCa) at repeated biopsies in patients with diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN).

Patients and Methods

At our institute all patients with a diagnosis of PIN undergo a 6–monthly control biopsy until the achievement of a benign histology or up to a maximum of 4 consecutive biopsies. For this study a retrospective review of clinical and bioptic data of patients with a diagnosis of isolated PIN (i.e. without associated atypical small acinar proliferation or small cancer foci) was carried out. The correlation between these features and the probability to find PCa at the first re-biopsy or at a further re-biopsy was independently analyzed.

Results

The data of 546 patients subjected to a median number of 3 biopsies, (mean: 10.8 and 12.9 cores at initial biopsy and at first re-biopsy respectively), and with a mean “bioptic” follow-up time of 14.8 months, were analyzed. PCa was found in 174 cases (31.8%): for 116 of them it took place at the first re-biopsy with a mean latency of 7.8 months from PIN diagnosis, whereas for 58 at a further re-biopsy with a mean latency of 21.6 months. The risk of diagnosing PCa at the first re-biopsy was statistically correlated with the PSA value - for which a cut-off value of 7 ng/mL was identified - and with an anomalous rectal prostatic examination at the time of the initial biopsy. Differently, the risk of diagnosing PCa after the first re-biopsy correlated with the number of cores positive for PIN at the initial biopsy - for which a cut-off of 4 was identified - and to the ratio between these and the total number of cores, defined as PIN density - for which a cut-off of 50% was determined.

Discussion and Conclusions

It is possible to suggest a tailored protocol of controls in patients with a diagnosis of PIN on the basis of the data available at the initial biopsy: a) high PSA value and/or an anomalous prostatic rectal examination: the diagnosis of PCa is probably just unacknowledged by the initial sampling and it is advisable to carry out an early re-biopsy; b) number of cores with PIN equal to or higher than 4 and/or PIN density equal to or higher than 50%: a true transition from PIN to PCa is likely to happen with time and it is advisable to carry out a delayed re-biopsy; c) no risk factors: just clinical and PSA monitoring to establish the indication to re-biopsy.

Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature

CONTEXT

The number and location of biopsy cores and the interpretation of prostate biopsy in different clinical settings remain the subjects of continuing debate.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to review the current evidence regarding the performance and interpretation of initial, repeat, and saturation prostatic biopsy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive Medline search was performed using the Medical Subject Heading search terms prostate biopsy, prostate cancer, detection, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), nomogram, and diagnosis. Results were restricted to the English language, with preference given to those published within the last 3 yr.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

At initial biopsy, a minimum of 10 but not >18 systematic cores are recommended, with 14-18 cores in glands ≥ 50 cm³. Biopsies should be directed laterally, and transition zone (TZ) cores are not recommended in the initial biopsy setting. Further biopsy sets, either as an extended repeat or as a saturation biopsy (≥ 20 cores) including the TZ, are warranted in young and fit men with a persistent suspicion of prostate cancer. An immediate repeat biopsy is not indicated for prior high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis given an adequate extended initial biopsy. Conversely, biopsies with atypical glands that are suspicious but not diagnostic of cancer should be repeated within 3-6 mo. Overall recommendations for further biopsy sets (a third set or more) cannot be made. Transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsies represent the standard-of-care method of prostate sampling. However, transperineal biopsies are an up-to-standard alternative.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal prostatic biopsy regimen should be based on the individualized clinical setting of the patient and should follow the minimum standard requirements reported in this paper.

Is high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia still a risk factor for adenocarcinoma in the era of extended biopsy sampling?

AIMS

There is controversy regarding the role of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on prostatic needle biopsy (PNB) as a risk factor for prostatic adenocarcinoma. We utilise a large Canadian database to determine whether HGPIN detected on extended PNB is a significant risk factor for prostatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Pathological findings from PNBs from 12 304 men who underwent initial PNB during an 8 year period were analysed. Patients were included in the study if their initial diagnosis was HGPIN alone or a benign diagnosis, if at least one follow-up PNB was performed, and if both the initial and follow-up PNB contained at least 10 prostate cores.

RESULTS

In the benign group of 105 patients and the HGPIN group of 120 patients, 14.1% and 20.8% were diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma, respectively. When the HGPIN group was further subdivided into unifocal (1 core) and multifocal (>or=2 cores) groups, 9.4% and 29.9% developed prostatic adenocarcinoma, respectively (p < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis adjusting for age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) confirms the significance of HGPIN as a risk factor for prostatic adenocarcinoma (p = 0.0045).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an initial diagnosis of multifocal HGPIN on extended PNB are at a greater risk for subsequent prostatic adenocarcinoma than those with unifocal HGPIN or benign diagnoses.