High Dose Chemotherapy as Salvage Treatment for Unresectable Late Relapse Germ Cell Tumors

Analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI) in pediatric gonadal and extra-gonadal germ cell tumors

Gonadal and extragonadal pediatric germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare neoplasms with different clinical behavior. Although surgery and cisplatin-based chemotherapy are resolutive in most cases, some patients do not respond to chemotherapy and have a worse outcome. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was correlated to resistance to chemotherapy and sensitivity to immunotherapy in different neoplasms. A series of 21 pediatric GCTs were tested by immuno-histochemistry and PCR to evaluate MSI status. Next generation sequencing was applied to further evaluate cases with discordant results between immunohistochemistry and PCR. Twenty-one cases of pediatric GCT were included in the series. The mean age ranged between 1 and 10 years. Nine cases were gonadal GCTs and the remaining 12 were extra-gonadal GCTs. By immunohistochemistry, one case showed a deficit of Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. This case was a 1-year-old children affected by gonadal yolk sac tumor. However, all cases resulted microsatellite stable (MSS) by PCR and NGS. MSI was not detected in our series of pediatric GCTs, as well as the data present in literature about adult patients with GCTs. Molecular techniques could have a role to confirm the MSI status in case of dMMR by immunohistochemistry.

High-dose chemotherapy for relapsed testicular germ cell tumours

Relapsed testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) might be cured with salvage chemotherapy. Accepted salvage treatment is conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). HDCT with peripheral blood stem cell transplant might produce a higher number of durable responses than CDCT. We discuss studies reporting on outcomes of salvage HDCT in relapsed GCTs. The most reproducible results were achieved with HDCT with two cycles of etoposide and carboplatin or three cycles of the paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide regime. Using these two regimens, sustained cure rates of 50-66% were reported in phase I, phase II and retrospective studies published in the past two decades. Cure rates in patients with cisplatin-resistant disease are between 30% and 45%. Two phase III randomized studies were conducted with certain limitations and were unsuccessful in showing a survival benefit of HDCT. Thus, salvage treatment remains a controversial topic. Salvage HDCT with peripheral blood stem cell transplant and CDCT are two recommended treatment options for relapsed GCTs. Consistently reported cure rates from phase I, phase II and large retrospective studies support the use of HDCT in the hands of an experienced team of oncologists.

Salvage management of patients with relapsing testicular germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize the latest evidence of medical and surgical treatment options for patients with relapsing testicular germ cell tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Depending on International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Group risk classification 10-50% of patients with metastatic TGCT develop relapse which needs further multimodality treatment. With regard to therapy, early relapses are stratified according to their prognostic risk profile which results in a 3-year overall survival between 6% in the very high to 77% in the very low risk group. Prognostic risk score dictates systemic therapy which might be second line chemotherapy (TIP, PEI) or high dose chemotherapy. Any residual masses following salvage chemotherapy need to be completely resected due the presence of viable cancer and/or teratoma in more than 50% of cases. Targeted therapy in men with druggable mutations is for individualized cases only. Patients with late relapses developing more than 2 years after first-line chemotherapy are best managed by surgery. Desperation surgery is reserved for those patients with rising markers during or immediately after chemotherapy and good risk factors such as rising alpha-fetoprotein, <3 metastatic sites and complete resectability. Multimodality treatment will result in long-term cure of 25% to 60%. Due to the complexity of treatment, chemotherapy as well as surgery should be performed in highly experienced centres only.

SUMMARY

Multimodality treatment to salvage relapsing patients with metastatic testis cancer requires extensive experience for both systemic therapy and surgery. If done properly, it will result in moderate to high cure rates. Personalized therapeutic options are currently evaluated in clinical trials.

Management of Refractory Germ Cell Cancer

Over the past 5 decades, the use of well-validated, guideline-based strategies has resulted in high cure rates in newly diagnosed patients with germ cell cancer. However, about 30% of those with metastatic disease at initial presentation will experience refractory disease. Salvage treatment is far more complex and less validated than first-line treatment because it is rare, patient cohorts are more heterogeneous, and prognostic factors seem to have greater impact. Prior to the initiation of any salvage treatment, several considerations must be made, including assessment of known prognostic factors and choice of the optimal salvage strategy. Evaluation of patients according to their disease biology, response to prior treatment, and the extent of their tumor burden at the time of salvage treatment is crucial for establishing the optimal salvage strategy. Patients with metastatic germ cell cancer in whom adequate cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy fails should be included in the ongoing randomized TIGER trial comparing conventional-dose chemotherapy with high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment. Outside this trial, patients may be treated with conventional or high-dose chemotherapy depending on the presence or absence of adverse prognostic factors, availability of resources, and patient and physician preferences.

The Role of Salvage High-Dose Chemotherapy in Relapsed Male Germ Cell Tumors

Germ cell tumors (GCT) are a unique tumor entity with excellent cure rates if guideline-endorsed treatment is thoroughly applied. Even patients with widespread metastatic disease can often be cured with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy as part of a multimodal treatment approach. However, about 30% of patients with metastatic disease at initial presentation, corresponding to about 5-10% of all GCT patients, relapse or progress despite first-line treatment and therefore require salvage chemotherapy. Salvage systemic treatment either consists of conventional-dose cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy or sequential high-dose treatment with carboplatin and etoposide plus subsequent autologous stem cell support. This review is based on a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE and conference proceedings of ESMO, ASCO, and EAU meetings until 2018 and provides an overview of current treatment options for germ cell cancer patients relapsing after or progressing during first-line cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Role of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Rescue in Men With Previously Treated Germ Cell Tumors

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 39-year-old, previously healthy man presented with a left testicular mass, confirmed on ultrasound. He underwent left inguinal orchiectomy, which disclosed testicular carcinoma composed of 90% choriocarcinoma, 9% seminoma, and 1% teratoma. Imaging revealed numerous metastases in the lungs, liver, and brain. Prechemotherapy levels of serum tumor markers were alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 2.0 ng/mL, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 151,111 IU/L, and lactate dehydrogenase 588 U/L. He received four courses of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy, given without bleomycin because of the anticipated need for postchemotherapy thoracic surgery. He had an incomplete response to induction chemotherapy. The serum hCG level was 8.1 IU/L, and there were residual lesions in the liver and lungs whereas the brain metastases had nearly resolved. His Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was zero. He had no symptoms of ototoxicity or peripheral neurotoxicity. Repeat serum hCG levels after chemotherapy were 12.3 IU/L at 2 weeks and 325 IU/L at 4 weeks. He was referred to discuss optimal ongoing treatment.

High-dose chemotherapy for germ cell tumors: do we have a model?

INTRODUCTION

Since the late nineties, the intensification of chemotherapy doses with hematopoietic stem cell rescue held promise for patients with advanced and poor prognosis germ cell tumors (GCTs). High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has, nowadays, a recognized indication in the salvage setting of advanced GCTs and is steadily utilized worldwide.

AREAS COVERED

We evaluated the available data with the use of HDCT in these patients. In addition, we provided an original perspective on several issues as experts on behalf of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and IGG, including peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and the use of HDCT in special subpopulations of GCT, with the aim to help clarify critical issues in the absence of available clear-cut information.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite HDCT being currently considered a therapeutic option in the salvage setting, critical questions regarding patient selection are still unanswered. Eligibility of patients with a chemoresistant disease, the use of available prognostic factors as well as tumor marker decline in clinical practice are pending issues. Moving forward, these are critical arguments in favor of further clinical research in the field of advanced GCTs.

A phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) supported by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy: the Multicentric TAXIF II study

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is an effective salvage treatment of germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients. In the first salvage setting, 30%-70% of patients may achieve durable remissions. Even when HDCT is administered as subsequent salvage treatment, up to 20% of patients may still be definitively cured. However, patients with refractory/relapsed disease still have a very poor long-term prognosis, requiring earlier intervention of HDCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial was addressed to nonrefractory patients failing Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria included seminomatous GCT in relapse after two lines of chemotherapy, nonseminomatous GCT in relapse after first or second lines, partial remission after first line, primary mediastinal GCT in first relapse. Patients received two cycles combining Epirubicin and Paclitaxel (Epi-Tax), followed by three consecutive HDCT, one using a Paclitaxel/Thiotepa (Thio-Tax) association and two using the 5-day Ifosfamide-Carboplatin-Etoposide regimen. The main objective was to determine the complete response rate.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included between September 2004 and December 2007: 44 received the first HDCT cycle, 39 two HDCT cycles, 29 could receive the whole protocol. Sixteen patients did not receive the entire protocol, including eight (17.7%) for toxic side-effects. Two patients (4.4%) died of toxicities, and 17 (37.7%) of disease progression. With a median follow-up time of 26 months (range, 4-51), the final overall response rate was 48.8% (including a complete response rate of 15.5% and a partial response/negative serum markers rate of 26.6%) in an intent-to-treat analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 22 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2-not reached] and 32 months (95% CI 4-49), respectively. The 2-year PFS was a plateau setup at 50% (95% CI 32-67) and the 2-year OS was 66% (95% CI 44-81).

CONCLUSION

The TAXIF II protocol was effective in nonrefractory GCT patients failing Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The toxic death rate remained acceptable in the field of HDCT regimens.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00231582.

[Update on first-line and relapse chemotherapy for testicular cancer]

Germ-cell cancer (GCC) is still the most common cancer diagnosis in men between the ages of 20 and 45 years with an increasing incidence. Due to effective and standardized algorithms that have been developed to stratify patients into different risk groups, remarkable progress has been made in the medical treatment of testicular cancer with an overall cure rate of 88%. The application of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the choice of chemotherapy agents as well as treatment duration is defined in international consensus guidelines. The guidelines are based on histology, tumor stages and presence or absence of already known and well-established risk factors. These stringent parameters guarantee the optimal curative treatment options for each GCC patient and can avoid overtreatment as well as undertreatment. For patients with early stage disease, careful consideration between possible side effects due to an adjuvant therapy and the expected relapse rate must be made, whereas in advanced tumor stages the optimal sequence of chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy is the focus. In patients who progress or relapse after first-line therapy, the issue of optimal treatment represents a particular challenge and is far more complex. It needs to take into account the analysis of special prognostic variables for a further risk-tailored therapy. A careful weighting between the chosen regimen and the often higher rate of treatment failure in contrast to increased toxic side-effects is mandatory.The disregard of accurate risk stratification and application of accepted treatment standards for patients with GCC at the time of initial diagnosis or at relapse is associated with developing more extensive disease and more intensive treatment. It also results in lower cure rates with the need for further therapy or leads to death of the patient without ever having had a chance for cure.

Beyond stage I germ cell tumors: current status regarding treatment and long-term toxicities

Approximately 20% to 40% of patients with germ-cell tumors (GCT) will need advanced medical treatment because of relapse or initial metastatic disease. The survival and recommended treatment for men with metastatic disease varies according to histology, primary and metastatic sites, and the level of prechemotherapy tumor markers. For patients with a good prognosis, three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) or four cycles of etoposide, and cisplatin are recommended. For patients with intermediate- and poor prognosis, four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin remains the preferred treatment option, although a switch to a more intensive regimen can be considered a new alternative. A major advance in salvage therapy for GCT in the last 5 years was the development of a new risk classification system. Initial salvage treatment includes both high-dose chemotherapy and standard-dose chemotherapy. There is clear consensus that patients with residual masses larger than 1 cm should undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND); however, the role of PC-RPLND in patients with serologic and radiographic complete response to first-line chemotherapy is controversial. The rationale for PC-RPLND in patients with small residual masses is discussed, and only a small minority of advanced nonseminoma GCT (NSGCT) patients are suitable candidates for observation after first-line chemotherapy. Post-treatment long-term toxicity has emerged as an important issue for GCT survivors. Examples of late effects are secondary nongerm-cell cancers and cardiovascular disease, which represent the most severe and potentially life-threatening effects of cancer treatment. Follow-up of cancer survivors should include recommendations for maintaining a healthy lifestyle to reduce the risk of serious long-term and late effects of treatment.

Late relapse of testis cancer

Most relapses of germ-cell tumors occur within 2 years of initial treatment. In 2 % to 4 % of patients, relapse may occur later. The retroperitoneum is the primary site of late relapses, and alpha-fetoprotein is the predominant marker. These tumors are highly resistant to chemotherapy. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment. If the recurrent disease is inoperable, salvage chemotherapy may be instituted, followed by resection of the residual disease.

Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer

In November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377-1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497-513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, ∼50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.

Sequential Versus Single High-Dose Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Germ Cell Tumors: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term survival rates in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCTs) after single or sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT).

Patients and Methods

Between November 1999 and November 2004, 211 patients with relapsed or refractory GCT were randomly assigned to treatment with either one cycle of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, etoposide 375 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 6 g/m2 (VIP) plus three cycles of high-dose carboplatin 1,500 mg/m2 and etoposide 1,500 mg/m2 (CE, arm A) or three cycles of VIP plus one cycle of high-dose carboplatin 2,200 mg/m2, etoposide 1,800 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 6,400 mg/m2 (CEC, arm B) followed by autologous stem-cell reinfusion. Long-term progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) 6 years after random assignment of the last patient were compared by using the log-rank test.

Results

Overall, 108 and 103 patients were randomly assigned to arms A and B, respectivelyl. The study was stopped prematurely because of excess treatment-related mortality in arm B (14%) compared with that in arm A (4%; P = .01). As of December 2010, nine (5%) of 211 patients were lost to follow-up; 94 (45%) of 211 are alive and 88 (94%) of 94 patients are progression free. Five-year PFS is 47% (95% CI, 37% to 56%) in arm A and 45% (95% CI, 35% to 55%) in arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.70; P = .454). Five-year OS is 49% (95% CI, 40% to 59%) in arm A and 39% (95% CI, 30% to 49%) in arm B (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.05; P = .057).

Conclusion

Patients with relapsed or refractory GCT achieve durable long-term survival after single as well as sequential HDCT. Fewer early deaths related to toxicity translated into superior long-term OS after sequential HDCT.

[EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. European Association of Urology]

CONTEXT

On behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU), guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer were established.

OBJECTIVE

This article is a short version of the EAU testicular cancer guidelines and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of testicular cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary guidelines working group. A systematic review was carried out using Medline and Embase, also taking Cochrane evidence and data from the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group into consideration. A panel of experts weighted the references, and a level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of literature especially regarding longer term follow-up, and results from a number of ongoing trials are awaited. The choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance, and treatment in reference centres within clinical trials, especially for poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, provides better outcomes. For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, based on recently published data on long-term toxicity, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment. The TNM classification 2009 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information for the standardised management of patients with testicular cancer based on the latest scientific insights. Cure rates are generally excellent, but because testicular cancer mainly affects men in their third or fourth decade of life, treatment effects on fertility require careful counselling of patients, and treatment must be tailored taking individual circumstances and patient preferences into account.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Although testicular cancer has excellent cure rates, the choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance. Expert centres achieve better results for both early stage testicular cancer (lower relapse rates) and overall survival (higher stages within clinical trials). For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment.

Overlooking evolution: a systematic analysis of cancer relapse and therapeutic resistance research

Cancer therapy selects for cancer cells resistant to treatment, a process that is fundamentally evolutionary. To what extent, however, is the evolutionary perspective employed in research on therapeutic resistance and relapse? We analyzed 6,228 papers on therapeutic resistance and/or relapse in cancers and found that the use of evolution terms in abstracts has remained at about 1% since the 1980s. However, detailed coding of 22 recent papers revealed a higher proportion of papers using evolutionary methods or evolutionary theory, although this number is still less than 10%. Despite the fact that relapse and therapeutic resistance is essentially an evolutionary process, it appears that this framework has not permeated research. This represents an unrealized opportunity for advances in research on therapeutic resistance.

EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update

CONTEXT

On behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU), guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer were established.

OBJECTIVE

This article is a short version of the EAU testicular cancer guidelines and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of testicular cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary guidelines working group. A systematic review was carried out using Medline and Embase, also taking Cochrane evidence and data from the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group into consideration. A panel of experts weighted the references, and a level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of literature especially regarding longer term follow-up, and results from a number of ongoing trials are awaited. The choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance, and treatment in reference centres within clinical trials, especially for poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, provides better outcomes. For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, based on recently published data on long-term toxicity, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment. The TNM classification 2009 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information for the standardised management of patients with testicular cancer based on the latest scientific insights. Cure rates are generally excellent, but because testicular cancer mainly affects men in their third or fourth decade of life, treatment effects on fertility require careful counselling of patients, and treatment must be tailored taking individual circumstances and patient preferences into account.

A review of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic models for disseminated germ cell tumors

Despite an excellent prognosis even for patients with disseminated disease, about 20% to 30% of men with advanced germ cell tumors are refractory to first-line chemotherapy or experience disease recurrence after an initial remission with such treatment. Many of these are cured with conventional dose cisplatin/ifosfamide-based regimen or high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. Controversy exists regarding the optimal choice between these 2 second-line approaches, and available data for each is reviewed here. Clinical factors can help prognosticate patients, and recently an international effort developed a prognostic model for the second-line setting that can be universally applied in future studies.