1
|
Piszczek R, Krajewski W, Subiela JD, Del Giudice F, Nowak Ł, Chorbińska J, Moschini M, Masson-Lecomte A, Bebane S, Cimadamore A, Grobet-Jeandin E, Rouprêt M, D'Andrea D, Mastroianni R, Gutierrez Hidalgo B, Gomez Rivas J, Mori K, Soria F, Laukhtina E, Mari A, Albisinni S, Gallioli A, Mertens LS, Pichler R, Marcq G, Łaszkiewicz J, Hałoń A, Carrion DM, Akand M, Pradere B, Shariat SF, Palou J, Babjuk M, Burgos Revilla J, Małkiewicz B, Szydełko T. Prognosis of patients with T1 low-grade urothelial bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:591-599. [PMID: 37728495 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05418-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The existence and prognosis of T1LG (T1 low-grade) bladder cancer is controversial. Also, because of data paucity, it remains unclear what is the clinical history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated T1LG tumors and if it differs from other NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer) representatives. The aim of this study was to analyse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T1LG bladder cancers treated with BCG immunotherapy. METHODS A multi-institutional and retrospective study of 2510 patients with Ta/T1 NMIBC with or without carcinoma in situ (CIS) treated with BCG (205 T1LG patients) was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test for RFS and PFS to compare the survival between TaLG, TaHG, T1LG, and T1HG NMIBC were used. Also, T1LG tumors were categorized into EAU2021 risk groups and PFS analysis was performed, and Cox multivariate model for both RFS and PFS were constructed. RESULTS The median follow-up was 52 months. For the T1LG cohort, the estimated RFS and PFS rates at 5-year were 59.3% and 89.2%, respectively. While there were no differences in RFS between NMIBC subpopulations, a slightly better PFS was found in T1LG NMIBC compared to T1HG (5-year PFS; T1LG vs. T1HG: 82% vs. 89%; P<0.001). A heterogeneous classification of patients with T1LG NMIBC was observed when EAU 2021 prognostic model was applied, finding a statistically significant worse PFS in patients classified as high-risk T1LG (5-year PFS; 81.8%) compared to those in intermediate (5-year PFS; 93,4%), and low-risk T1LG tumors (5-year PFS; 98,1%). CONCLUSIONS The RFS of T1LG was comparable to other NMIBC subpopulations. The PFS of T1LG tumors was significantly better than of T1HG NMIBC. The EAU2021 scoring model heterogeneously categorized the risk of progression in T1LG tumors and the high-risk T1LG had the worst PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radosław Piszczek
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland -
| | - Jose D Subiela
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Łukasz Nowak
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sonia Bebane
- Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jan Łaszkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Hałoń
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Diego M Carrion
- Department of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Murat Akand
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Juan Palou
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Javier Burgos Revilla
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Maxim Bruins H, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, A L M Kiemeney L, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. T1G1 Bladder Cancer: Prognosis for this Rare Pathological Diagnosis Within the Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Spectrum. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1627-1634. [PMID: 35577750 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathological existence and clinical consequence of stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer are the subject of debate. Even though the diagnosis of T1G1 is controversial, several reports have consistently found a prevalence of 2-6% G1 in their T1 series. However, it remains unclear if T1G1 carcinomas have added value as a separate category to predict prognosis within the non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) spectrum. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of T1G1 carcinomas compared to TaG1 and T1G2 carcinomas within the NMIBC spectrum. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta and T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals in Europe and Canada were analyzed. Transurethral resection (TUR) was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Time to recurrence and progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS T1G1 represented 1.9% (99/5170) of all carcinomas and 5.3% (99/1859) of T1 carcinomas. According to primary TUR dates, the proportion of T1G1 varied between 0.9% and 3.5% per year, with similar percentages in the early and later calendar years. We found no difference in time to recurrence between T1G1 and TaG1 (p = 0.91) or between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Time to progression significantly differed between TaG1 and T1G1 (p < 0.001) but not between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS The relative prevalence of T1G1 diagnosis was low and remained constant over the past three decades. Time to recurrence of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for other stage/grade NMIBC combinations. Time to progression of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for T1G2 but not for TaG1, suggesting that treatment and surveillance of T1G1 carcinomas should be more like the approaches for T1G2 NMIBC in accordance with the intermediate and/or high risk categories of the European Association of Urology NMIBC guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY Although rare, stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer is still diagnosed in daily clinical practice. Using individual patient data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada, we found that time to progression of T1G1 cancer was comparable to that for T1G2 but not TaG1 cancer. Therefore, our results suggest that primary T1G1 bladder cancers should be managed with more aggressive treatment and more frequent follow-up than for low-risk bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Plata A, Guerrero-Ramos F, Garcia C, González-Díaz A, Gonzalez-Valcárcel I, de la Morena JM, Díaz-Goizueta FJ, del Álamo JF, Gonzalo V, Montero J, Sousa-Escandón A, León J, Pontones JL, Delgado F, Adriazola M, Pascual Á, Calleja J, Ruano A, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Angulo JC. Long-Term Experience with Hyperthermic Chemotherapy (HIVEC) Using Mitomycin-C in Patients with Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Spain. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215105. [PMID: 34768625 PMCID: PMC8584886 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Intravesical mitomycin-C (MMC) combined with hyperthermia is increasingly used in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), especially in the context of a relative BCG shortage. We aim to determine real-world data on the long-term treatment outcomes of adjunct hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with MMC and a COMBAT® bladder recirculation system (BRS); (2) Methods: A prospective observational trial was performed on patients with NMIBC treated with HIVEC using BRS in nine academic institutions in Spain between 2012–2020 (HIVEC-E). Treatment effectiveness (recurrence, progression and overall mortality) was evaluated in patients treated with HIVEC MMC 40mg in the adjuvant setting, with baseline data and a clinical follow-up, that comprise the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Safety, according to the number and severity of adverse effects (AEs), was evaluated in the safety (SAF) population, composed by patients with at least one adjunct HIVEC MMC instillation; (3) Results: The FAS population (n = 502) received a median number of 8.78 ± 3.28 (range 1–20) HIVEC MMC instillations. The median follow-up duration was 24.5 ± 16.5 (range 1–81) months. Its distribution, based on EAU risk stratification, was 297 (59.2%) for intermediate and 205 (40.8%) for high-risk. The figures for five-year recurrence-free and progression-free survival were 50.37% (53.3% for intermediate and 47.14% for high-risk) and 89.83% (94.02% for intermediate and 84.23% for high-risk), respectively. A multivariate analysis identified recurrent tumors (HR 1.83), the duration of adjuvant HIVEC therapy <4 months (HR 1.72) and that high-risk group (HR 1.47) were at an increased risk of recurrence. Independent factors of progression were high-risk (HR 3.89), recurrent tumors (HR 3.32) and the induction of HIVEC therapy without maintenance (HR 2.37). The overall survival was determined by patient age at diagnosis (HR 3.36) and the treatment duration (HR 1.82). The SAF population (n = 592) revealed 406 (68.58%) patients without AEs and 186 (31.42%) with at least one AE: 170 (28.72%) of grade 1–2 and 16 (2.7%) of grade 3–4. The most frequent AEs were dysuria (10%), pain (7.1%), urgency (5.7%), skin rash (4.9%), spasms (3.7%) and hematuria (3.6%); (4) Conclusions: HIVEC using BRS is efficacious and well tolerated. A longer treatment duration, its use in naïve patients and the intermediate-risk disease are independent determinants of success. Furthermore, a monthly maintenance of adjunct MMC HIVEC diminishes the progression rate of NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Plata
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Carretera Ofra s/n, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain; (A.P.); (C.G.)
| | - Félix Guerrero-Ramos
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (F.G.-R.); (A.G.-D.)
| | - Carlos Garcia
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Carretera Ofra s/n, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain; (A.P.); (C.G.)
| | - Alejandro González-Díaz
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (F.G.-R.); (A.G.-D.)
| | - Ignacio Gonzalez-Valcárcel
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Paseo de Europa 34, San Sebastián de los Reyes, 28702 Madrid, Spain; (I.G.-V.); (J.M.d.l.M.)
| | - José Manuel de la Morena
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Paseo de Europa 34, San Sebastián de los Reyes, 28702 Madrid, Spain; (I.G.-V.); (J.M.d.l.M.)
| | | | - Julio Fernández del Álamo
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Mateo Inurria, s/n, Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Victoria Gonzalo
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Avenida Islas Baleares 3, 09006 Burgos, Spain; (V.G.); (J.M.)
| | - Javier Montero
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Avenida Islas Baleares 3, 09006 Burgos, Spain; (V.G.); (J.M.)
| | - Alejandro Sousa-Escandón
- Urology Department, Hospital Comarcal de Monforte, Rúa Corredoira s/n, 27400 Monforte de Lemos, Spain; (A.S.-E.); (J.L.)
| | - Juan León
- Urology Department, Hospital Comarcal de Monforte, Rúa Corredoira s/n, 27400 Monforte de Lemos, Spain; (A.S.-E.); (J.L.)
| | - Jose Luis Pontones
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (J.L.P.); (F.D.)
| | - Francisco Delgado
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (J.L.P.); (F.D.)
| | - Miguel Adriazola
- Urology Department, Hospital General Rio Carrión, Avenida Donantes de Sangre s/n, 34005 Palencia, Spain; (M.A.); (Á.P.)
| | - Ángela Pascual
- Urology Department, Hospital General Rio Carrión, Avenida Donantes de Sangre s/n, 34005 Palencia, Spain; (M.A.); (Á.P.)
| | - Jesús Calleja
- Urology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Av. Ramón y Cajal 3, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (J.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Ana Ruano
- Urology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Av. Ramón y Cajal 3, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (J.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Luis Martínez-Piñeiro
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Javier C. Angulo
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Getafe, Carretera de Toledo, Km 12.500, Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain;
- Clinical Department, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Carretera de Toledo, Km 12.500, Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-699497569
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park JY. Risk Factors for Recurrence and Progression of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809939-1.00013-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Hofbauer SL, Shariat SF, Chade DC, Sarkis AS, Ribeiro-Filho LA, Nahas WC, Klatte T. The Moreau Strain of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) for High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Alternative during Worldwide BCG Shortage? Urol Int 2015; 96:46-50. [PMID: 26555711 DOI: 10.1159/000440701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard of care for adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy for intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after complete transurethral resection. Increasing evidence suggests that there are marked differences in outcomes according to BCG substrains. BCG-Moreau was recently introduced to the European market to cover the issue of BCG shortage, but there are little data regarding the oncologic efficacy. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 295 consecutive patients, who received adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy with BCG-Moreau for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC between October 2007 and April 2013 at a single institution. The end points of this study were time to first recurrence and progression to muscle-invasive disease. RESULTS Median age was 66 years (interquartile range 59-74, mean 65.9 years). According to the EAU risk group, 76 patients presented with intermediate-risk and 219 patients with high-risk NMIBC. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival rate was 64.8% (95% CI 52.8-74.4) and 81.4% (95% CI 65.2-90.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS BCG-Moreau is an effective substrain for adjuvant instillation therapies of NMIBC, and outcomes appear to be comparable to series using other substrains. During worldwide shortage of BCG-TICE, Connaught and RIVM, BCG-Moreau may serve as an equally effective alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian L Hofbauer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitrakas LP, Zachos IV, Tzortzis VP, Gravas SA, Rouka EC, Dimitropoulos KI, Vandoros GP, Karatzas AD, Melekos MD, Papavassiliou AG. Previous Bladder Cancer History in Patients with High-Risk, Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Correlates with Recurrence and Progression: Implications of Natural History. Cancer Res Treat 2014; 47:495-500. [PMID: 25483745 PMCID: PMC4506110 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Accepted: 04/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation of previous bladder cancer history with the recurrence and progression of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with adjuvant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and to evaluate their natural history. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were divided into two groups based on the existence of previous bladder cancer (primary, non-primary). A logistic regression analysis was used to identify the possible differences in the probabilities of recurrence and progression with respect to tumor history, while potential differences due to gender, tumor size (> 3 cm, < 3 cm), stage (pTa, T1), concomitant carcinoma in situ (pTis) and number of tumors (single, multiple) were also assessed. Univariate and multivariate models were employed. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare recurrence- and progression-free survival between the groups. RESULTS A total of 192 patients were included (144 with primary and 48 with non-primary tumors). The rates of recurrence and progression for patients with primary tumors were 27.8% and 12.5%, respectively. The corresponding percentages for patients with non-primary tumors were 77.1% and 33.3%, respectively. The latter group of patients displayed significantly higher probabilities of recurrence (p=0.000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.067 to 18.804) and progression (p=0.002; 95% CI, 1.609 to 7.614) in a univariate logistic regression analysis. Previous bladder cancer history remained significant in the multivariate model accounting for history, age, gender, tumor size , number of tumors, stage and concomitant pTis (p=0.000; 95% CI, 4.367 to 21.924 and p=0.002; 95% CI, 1.611 to 8.182 for recurrence and progression respectively). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the non-primary group hadreduced progression- and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION Previous non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer history correlates significantly with recurrence and progression in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive disease treated with adjuvant BCG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lampros P Mitrakas
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis V Zachos
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Vassileios P Tzortzis
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Stavros A Gravas
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Erasmia C Rouka
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Konstantinos I Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Anastasios D Karatzas
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Michael D Melekos
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walczak R, Bar K, Walczak J. The value of EORTC risk tables in evaluating recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in everyday practice. Cent European J Urol 2014; 66:418-22. [PMID: 24757531 PMCID: PMC3992449 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2013] [Revised: 09/23/2013] [Accepted: 10/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Due to the risk of recurrence and progression, patients with non–muscle–invasive bladder cancer have to be under observation. The aim of this study is the evaluation of early recurrence at the first control cystoscopy, as a prognostic factor for recurrence and progression based on EORTC risk tables. Material and methods This study analyzed 243 patients with non–muscle–invasive bladder cancer, with an average observation time of 46 months. Recurrence was observed in case of 99 patients. Among these patients, we selected 79 who had the first cystoscopy 3 months after the transurethral electroresection of the bladder tumor. Subsequently, 45 patients with early recurrence at the first control cystoscopy were compared with 34 patients whose cancer recurred at later control cystoscopies. The patients were compared with respect to the number of points assigned by EORTC tables. Results Those patients who had an early recurrence had a significantly higher score in the EORTC table in the progression scale (p = 0.017) but not in the recurrence scale (p = 0.11), as compared with patients who had a late recurrence. Conclusions Early recurrence that occurs within 3 months after TURBT indicates a higher risk of progression, as compared with a late recurrence. Patients who had an early recurrence had a significantly higher EORTC risk score for progression. Their EORTC risk score for recurrence was also higher, but the difference was not statistically significant. Every patient with an early recurrence has a worse prognosis and a higher risk of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Walczak
- Department of Urology, Henryk Jankowski District Hospital in Przeworsk, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Bar
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Medical University in Lublin, Poland
| | - Janusz Walczak
- Department of Urology, Henryk Jankowski District Hospital in Przeworsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parsons JK, Pierce JP, Natarajan L, Newman VA, Barbier L, Mohler J, Rock CL, Heath DD, Guru K, Jameson MB, Li H, Mirheydar H, Holmes MA, Marshall J. A randomized pilot trial of dietary modification for the chemoprevention of noninvasive bladder cancer: the dietary intervention in bladder cancer study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013; 6:971-8. [PMID: 23867158 PMCID: PMC3857028 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-13-0050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Epidemiological data suggest robust associations of high vegetable intake with decreased risks of bladder cancer incidence and mortality, but translational prevention studies have yet to be conducted. We designed and tested a novel intervention to increase vegetable intake in patients with noninvasive bladder cancer. We randomized 48 patients aged 50 to 80 years with biopsy-proven noninvasive (Ta, T1, or carcinoma in situ) urothelial cell carcinoma to telephone- and Skype-based dietary counseling or a control condition that provided print materials only. The intervention behavioral goals promoted seven daily vegetable servings, with at least two of these as cruciferous vegetables. Outcome variables were self-reported diet and plasma carotenoid and 24-hour urinary isothiocyanate (ITC) concentrations. We used two-sample t tests to assess between-group differences at 6-month follow-up. After 6 months, intervention patients had higher daily intakes of vegetable juice (P = 0.02), total vegetables (P = 0.02), and cruciferous vegetables (P = 0.07); lower daily intakes of energy (P = 0.007), fat (P = 0.002) and energy from fat (P = 0.06); and higher plasma α-carotene concentrations (P = 0.03). Self-reported cruciferous vegetable intake correlated with urinary ITC concentrations at baseline (P < 0.001) and at 6 months (P = 0.03). Although urinary ITC concentrations increased in the intervention group and decreased in the control group, these changes did not attain between-group significance (P = 0.32). In patients with noninvasive bladder cancer, our novel intervention induced diet changes associated with protective effects against bladder cancer. These data show the feasibility of implementing therapeutic dietary modifications to prevent recurrent and progressive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kellogg Parsons
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0987, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Although the conservative approach including Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy is considered as the first-line option in high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder tumors, cystectomy is often required as an alternative treatment in the case of BCG failure. Considering all the parameters, including clinical data, endoscopic aspects and new biological markers, the question of the indication, and moreover timing, of cystectomy has become crucial. RECENT FINDINGS In fact, the real positive effect of BCG remains controversial and its actual benefit in terms of survival is not evident. Therefore, early cystectomy for this population with high risk of progression and metastasis diffusion is clearly a radical approach which can lead to a reduction in specific mortality. Recent articles have studied the parameters involved in this issue to determine the exact timing of cystectomy. SUMMARY To avoid delay of appropriate treatment, it is crucial to determine the non-BCG responder population. Unfortunately, no consensual marker is currently available. Nevertheless, multifocal tumors, associated carcinoma in situ, prostatic urethral involvement, tumoral size greater than 3 cm and depth of infiltration are useful parameters in clinical practice to propose early cystectomy. In the future, the crucial question of cystectomy timing may be answered by progress in molecular signatures for bladder cancers.
Collapse
|
10
|
Predictive factors for recurrence progression and cancer specific survival in high-risk bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2012; 22:415-20. [PMID: 22825460 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e328356ac20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite standard treatment with transurethral resection (TUR) and adjuvant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), a large percentage of high-risk bladder cancer (HRBC) recur, and some progress. On the basis of review of the current guidelines and literature, we have developed actualized clinical and molecular prognostic factors of recurrence, progression and cancer specific survival (CSS) in patients with HRBC. RECENT FINDINGS A Medline search was conducted to identify the current literature updating the most important clinic and pathological predictive factors published in the last years. Also, there have been reviewed the new molecular markers that can assess prognosis and BCG response. SUMMARY Despite different methodological bias, as short follow-up, a small number of patients and a different definition of prognostic factors, increased evidence supports sex, age, grade, stage, multifocality, history of previous recurrences, carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra and early recurrence as prognostic factors for recurrence, progression and CSS in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Also lymphovascular invasion in TUR and new molecular markers (galectin-3, profilin-1, and combination of markers) are increasingly useful in predicting prognosis and BCG response. Moreover, there is enough evidence to consider the implementation of new specific risk tables for patients treated with BCG. In cases with poor prognostic factors after TUR in HRBC early cystectomy should be considered.
Collapse
|
11
|
Thomas F, Noon AP, Rubin N, Goepel JR, Catto JWF. Comparative outcomes of primary, recurrent, and progressive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2012; 63:145-54. [PMID: 22985746 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2012] [Accepted: 08/28/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) is problematic given the variable natural history of the disease. Few reports have compared outcomes for primary high-risk tumours with those that develop following previous BCas (relapses). The latter represent a self-selected cohort, having failed previous treatments. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes in patients with primary, progressive, and recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive BCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We identified all patients with primary and relapsing high-risk BCa tumours at our institution since 1994. Relapses were divided into progressive (previous low- or intermediate-risk disease) and recurrent (previous high-risk disease) cancers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Relationships with outcome analysed using multivariable Cox regression and log-rank analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We identified 699 primary, 110 progressive, and 494 recurrent high-risk BCa tumours in 809 patients (average follow-up: 59 mo [interquartile range: 6-190]). Muscle invasion occurred most commonly in recurrent (23%) tumours, when compared to progressive (20%) and primary (14.6%) cohorts (log rank p<0.001). Disease-specific mortality (DSM) occurred more frequently in patients with recurrent (25.5%) and progressive (24.6%) tumours compared to primary disease (19.2%; log rank p=0.006). Other-cause mortality was similar in all groups (log rank p=0.57), and overall mortality was highest in the progressive cohort (62%) compared with the recurrent (58%) and primary groups (54%; log rank p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, progression and DSM were predicted by tumour grouping (hazard ratio [HR]: >1.15; p<0.026), stage (HR: >1.30; p<0.001), and patient age and sex (HR: >1.03; p<0.037). Carcinoma in situ was only predictive of outcome in primary tumors. Limitations include retrospective design and limited details regarding bacillus Camille-Guérin use. CONCLUSIONS Patients with relapsing, high-risk, BCa tumors have higher progression, DSM, and overall mortality rates than those with primary cancers. The use of bladder-sparing strategies in these patients should approached cautiously. Carcinoma in situ has little predicative role in relapsing, high-risk, BCa tumors.
Collapse
|
12
|
May M, Stief C, Brookman-May S, Otto W, Gilfrich C, Roigas J, Zacharias M, Wieland WF, Fritsche HM, Hofstädter F, Burger M. Gender-dependent cancer-specific survival following radical cystectomy. World J Urol 2011; 30:707-13. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0773-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2011] [Accepted: 09/21/2011] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
13
|
Diminished Efficacy of Bacille Calmette-Guérin Among Elderly Patients with Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urology 2011; 78:848-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2011] [Revised: 04/11/2011] [Accepted: 12/04/2011] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
14
|
Long-term Cancer-specific Survival in Patients with High-risk, Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer and Tumour Progression: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2011; 60:493-500. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2011] [Accepted: 05/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
15
|
Segal R, Yafi FA, Brimo F, Tanguay S, Aprikian A, Kassouf W. Prognostic factors and outcome in patients with T1 high-grade bladder cancer: can we identify patients for early cystectomy? BJU Int 2011; 109:1026-30. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10462.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Boström PJ, Alkhateeb S, van Rhijn BWG, Kuk C, Zlotta AR. Optimal timing of radical cystectomy in T1 high-grade bladder cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011; 10:1891-902. [PMID: 21110756 DOI: 10.1586/era.10.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
T1 high-grade (formerly T1G3) bladder cancer is a challenging clinical entity representing approximately 10-15% of all new bladder cancer cases. The variable natural history of the disease and possible impairment in quality of life associated with radical treatment makes T1 high-grade one of the most challenging uro-oncological patient groups to manage. In particular, the risk of clinical understaging and not recognizing muscle-invasive disease may have detrimental effects on patient outcome. The cornerstone of contemporary staging is restaging transurethral resection (TUR), which helps in defining further management. In patients with restaging TUR stage less than T1, induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin combined with maintenance offers good results. The option of radical cystectomy should be discussed with patients with restaging TUR stage T1 or higher and it is highly recommended to all patients with recurrent T1 of carcinoma in situ during bacillus Calmette-Guérin maintenance. In addition to restaging TUR stage, several other clinicopathological factors, such T1 substaging, associated carcinoma in situ, tumor size and appearance, lymphovascular invasion, and hydronephrosis, aid in the decision making between radical and conservative treatment. Future prospects include improved staging and molecular markers that may guide toward conservative therapy or allow more cT1 patients to be offered nerve-sparing cystectomies and neobladders and, thus, improving quality of life for patients undergoing radical surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Boström
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Frequency of Tumor Recurrence: A Strong Predictor of Stage Progression in Initially Diagnosed Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. J Urol 2011; 185:450-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2010] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|