1
|
Galsky MD, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, Milowsky MI, Schenker M, Valderrama BP, Tomita Y, Bamias A, Lebret T, Shariat SF, Park SH, Agerbaek M, Jha G, Stenner F, Ye D, Giudici F, Dutta S, Askelson M, Nasroulah F, Zhang J, Brophy L, Bajorin DF. Adjuvant Nivolumab in High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: Expanded Efficacy From CheckMate 274. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2400340. [PMID: 39393026 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.CheckMate 274 is a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial of adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) at high risk of recurrence after radical resection. The primary end points of disease-free survival (DFS) in intent-to-treat (ITT) and tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% populations were met. We report results at an extended median follow-up of 36.1 months in the ITT population. In addition, we report interim overall survival (OS) data for the first time and an exploratory analysis among patients with bladder primary tumors (muscle-invasive bladder cancer [MIBC]). Consistent DFS benefit with nivolumab versus placebo was observed in both the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86]) and PD-L1 ≥1% (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.72]) patients. The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.96) in the ITT population and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86) in the PD-L1 ≥1 population. Continuous benefit in nonurothelial tract recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival was also observed in both patient populations. The exploratory analysis of patients with MIBC also showed continued efficacy benefits, irrespective of PD-L1 status. No new safety signals were reported. Overall, these results further support adjuvant nivolumab as a standard of care for high-risk MIUC after radical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Matthew I Milowsky
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | | | - Thierry Lebret
- Hôpital Foch, Paris-Saclay University UVSQ, Versailles, France
| | | | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Gautam Jha
- M Health Fairview Clinics and Surgery Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Dingwei Ye
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Flammia RS, Tuderti G, Bologna E, Minore A, Proietti F, Licari LC, Mastroianni R, Bove AM, Anceschi U, Brassetti A, Ferriero MC, Guaglianone S, Chiacchio G, Calabrò F, Leonardo C, Simone G. Stratifying the Risk of Disease Progression among Surgically Treated Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Eligible for Adjuvant Nivolumab. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5466. [PMID: 39336951 PMCID: PMC11432608 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Check-Mate 274 has demonstrated the disease-free survival (DFS) benefit of adjuvant nivolumab in surgically treated muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Since immunotherapy represents an expensive treatment with potential side effects, a better understanding of patient-specific risks of disease progression might be useful for clinicians when weighing the indication for adjuvant nivolumab. Objective: To identify the criteria for risk stratification of disease progression among MIBC patients eligible for adjuvant nivolumab. Materials and methods: A single-institution, prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients eligible for adjuvant nivolumab according to Check-Mate 274 criteria. To account for immortal bias, patients who died or were lost to follow-up within 3 months of undergoing a radical cystectomy (RC) were excluded. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses addressed DFS, defined as the time frame from diagnosis to the first documented recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Regression tree analysis was implemented to identify criteria for risk stratification. Results: Between 2011 and 2022, 304 patients were identified, with a median follow-up of 50 (IQR 24-72) months. After multivariable adjustment, including NAC as a potential confounder, higher CCI (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.10-2.21, p = 0.013), T stage (HR 2.06, 95%CI 1.01-4.17, p = 0.046), N stage (HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.26-2.38, p = 0.001) and presence of LVI (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.07-2.15, p = 0.019) increased the risk of disease recurrence or death. Finally, a two-tier classification was developed. Here, five-year DFS rates were 56.1% vs. 18.1 for low vs. high risk (HR: 2.54, 95%CI 1.79-3.62, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The current risk classification, if externally validated on larger samples, may be useful when weighing the risk and benefit of adjuvant nivolumab treatment and making patients more aware about their disease and about the need for additional treatment after RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Simone Flammia
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Minore
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Leslie Claire Licari
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Maria Consiglia Ferriero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Salvatore Guaglianone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy;
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy; (R.S.F.); (G.T.); (E.B.); (L.C.L.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (A.B.); (M.C.F.); (S.G.); (G.C.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berg SA, Galsky MD. Understanding Adjuvant Therapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1459-1461. [PMID: 38359384 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Berg
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brück K, Meijer RP, Boormans JL, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, van Hoogstraten LMC, van der Heijden MS, Donders AR, Franckena M, Uyl de Groot CA, Leliveld AM, Aben KKH, Hulshof MCCM. Disease-Free Survival of Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Preserving Therapy: A Nationwide Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:41-49. [PMID: 37517601 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although level I evidence is lacking that radical cystectomy (RC) is superior to bladder-preserving therapy (BPT), RC is still advocated as the recommended treatment in patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This study sought to compare the survival of patients with MIBC treated with BPT versus those treated with RC. METHODS AND MATERIALS All patients with nonmetastatic MIBC diagnoses were identified via the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Only patients treated with BPT or RC were included. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time from start of treatment until locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Inverse propensity treatment weighting (IPTW) was used based on propensity scores to adjust for baseline differences between treatment groups. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS A total of 1432 patients were included, of whom 1101 underwent RC and 331, BPT. Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 27-51 months). The IPTW-adjusted 2-year DFS was 61.5% (95% CI, 53.5%-69.6%) with BPT and 55.3% (95% CI, 51.6%-59.1%) with RC, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69-1.05). The adjusted 2-year OS for patients treated with BPT versus RC was 74.0% (95% CI, 67.0%-80.9%) versus 66.0% (95% CI, 62.7%-68.8%), respectively, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.98). CONCLUSIONS There was no statistically significant difference between the 2-year DFS of patients treated with BPT and RC. We propose that both RC and BPT should be offered as a curative treatment option to eligible patients with nonmetastatic MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Brück
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa M C van Hoogstraten
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - A Rogier Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Carin A Uyl de Groot
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie M Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zlotta AR, Ballas LK, Niemierko A, Lajkosz K, Kuk C, Miranda G, Drumm M, Mari A, Thio E, Fleshner NE, Kulkarni GS, Jewett MAS, Bristow RG, Catton C, Berlin A, Sridhar SS, Schuckman A, Feldman AS, Wszolek M, Dahl DM, Lee RJ, Saylor PJ, Michaelson MD, Miyamoto DT, Zietman A, Shipley W, Chung P, Daneshmand S, Efstathiou JA. Radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional propensity score matched and weighted analysis. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:669-681. [PMID: 37187202 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00170-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous randomised controlled trials comparing bladder preservation with radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer closed due to insufficient accrual. Given that no further trials are foreseen, we aimed to use propensity scores to compare trimodality therapy (maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumour followed by concurrent chemoradiation) with radical cystectomy. METHODS This retrospective analysis included 722 patients with clinical stage T2-T4N0M0 muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (440 underwent radical cystectomy, 282 received trimodality therapy) who would have been eligible for both approaches, treated at three university centres in the USA and Canada between Jan 1, 2005, and Dec 31, 2017. All patients had solitary tumours less than 7 cm, no or unilateral hydronephrosis, and no extensive or multifocal carcinoma in situ. The 440 cases of radical cystectomy represent 29% of all radical cystectomies performed during the study period at the contributing institutions. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. Differences in survival outcomes by treatment were analysed using propensity scores incorporated in propensity score matching (PSM) using logistic regression and 3:1 matching with replacement and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). FINDINGS In the PSM analysis, the 3:1 matched cohort comprised 1119 patients (837 radical cystectomy, 282 trimodality therapy). After matching, age (71·4 years [IQR 66·0-77·1] for radical cystectomy vs 71·6 years [64·0-78·9] for trimodality therapy), sex (213 [25%] vs 68 [24%] female; 624 [75%] vs 214 [76%] male), cT2 stage (755 [90%] vs 255 [90%]), presence of hydronephrosis (97 [12%] vs 27 [10%]), and receipt of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (492 [59%] vs 159 [56%]) were similar between groups. Median follow-up was 4·38 years (IQR 1·6-6·7) versus 4·88 years (2·8-7·7), respectively. 5-year metastasis-free survival was 74% (95% CI 70-78) for radical cystectomy and 75% (70-80) for trimodality therapy with IPTW and 74% (70-77) and 74% (68-79) with PSM. There was no difference in metastasis-free survival either with IPTW (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0·89 [95% CI 0·67-1·20]; p=0·40) or PSM (SHR 0·93 [0·71-1·24]; p=0·64). 5-year cancer-specific survival for radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy was 81% (95% CI 77-85) versus 84% (79-89) with IPTW and 83% (80-86) versus 85% (80-89) with PSM. 5-year disease-free survival was 73% (95% CI 69-77) versus 74% (69-79) with IPTW and 76% (72-80) versus 76% (71-81) with PSM. There were no differences in cancer-specific survival (IPTW: SHR 0·72 [95% CI 0·50-1·04]; p=0·071; PSM: SHR 0·73 [0·52-1·02]; p=0·057) and disease-free survival (IPTW: SHR 0·87 [0·65-1·16]; p=0·35; PSM: SHR 0·88 [0·67-1·16]; p=0·37) between radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy. Overall survival favoured trimodality therapy (IPTW: 66% [95% CI 61-71] vs 73% [68-78]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·92]; p=0·010; PSM: 72% [69-75] vs 77% [72-81]; HR 0·75 [0·58-0·97]; p=0·0078). Outcomes for radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy were not statistically different among centres for cancer-specific survival and metastasis-free survival (p=0·22-0·90). Salvage cystectomy was done in 38 (13%) trimodality therapy patients. Pathological stage in the 440 radical cystectomy patients was pT2 in 124 (28%), pT3-4 in 194 (44%), and 114 (26%) node positive. The median number of nodes removed was 39, the soft tissue positive margin rate was 1% (n=5), and the perioperative mortality rate was 2·5% (n=11). INTERPRETATION This multi-institutional study provides the best evidence to date showing similar oncological outcomes between radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy for select patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These results support that trimodality therapy, in the setting of multidisciplinary shared decision making, should be offered to all suitable candidates with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and not only to patients with significant comorbidities for whom surgery is not an option. FUNDING Sinai Health Foundation, Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre R Zlotta
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cynthia Kuk
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gus Miranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael Drumm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ethan Thio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Charles Catton
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anne Schuckman
- Aresty Department of Urology, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adam S Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Wszolek
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Douglas M Dahl
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard J Lee
- MGH Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Philip J Saylor
- MGH Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Dror Michaelson
- MGH Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David T Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anthony Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William Shipley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Aresty Department of Urology, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
von Deimling M, Rink M, Klemm J, Koelker M, König F, Gild P, Khonsari M, Ludwig TA, Marks P, Dahlem R, Fisch M, Vetterlein MW. Oncological validation and discriminative ability of pentafecta criteria after open radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2023; 131:90-100. [PMID: 36088640 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To validate the pentafecta criteria (PC) proposed by the PROMETRICS group for outcome reporting after radical cystectomy in an open radical cystectomy (ORC) cohort with long-term follow-up and to assess the discriminative ability of PC attainment for oncological endpoints. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2009 and December 2017, 420 patients underwent ORC with pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion for non-metastatic bladder cancer. The PC were defined as reported by the PROMETRICS group. The primary endpoint was PC attainment, and oncological outcomes comprised further endpoints. We used uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of PC attainment. The discriminative ability of PC for overall mortality (OM), cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and cumulative incidence functions. After stratification by the number of PC attained, the association between PC attainment and the survival endpoints was tested on multivariable Cox regression and competing-risks models. RESULTS A total of 108 patients (26%) fulfilled all PC, while 195 (46%), 77 (18%), 35 (8.3%) and five (1.2%) attained 4/5, 3/5, 2/5 and ≤1/5 PC, respectively. Increasing age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, P = 0.015) and incontinent diversion (OR 0.38, P = 0.005) were independent predictors of PC non-attainment. The median follow-up was 73 months. PC attainment (≥4/5 vs 3/5 vs ≤2/5 PC attained) was used to stratify patients into groups at significantly different risk of death (P < 0.001). A decreasing number of PC attained (<4/5) was associated with unfavourable survival estimates for both OM and CSM (all P ≤ 0.005) but not for OCM (all P ≥ 0.2). CONCLUSIONS The PC proposed by the PROMETRICS group represent accurate quality indicators for oncological outcome reporting after ORC for non-metastatic bladder cancer and have a distinct discriminative ability to predict long-term OM and CSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mara Koelker
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Gild
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maryam Khonsari
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Urologikum Hamburg MVZ Alstertal, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim A Ludwig
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Phillip Marks
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roland Dahlem
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Malte W Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Joyce DD, Wymer KM, Sharma V, Moriarty JP, Borah BJ, Geynisman DM, Plimack ER, Costello BA, Pagliaro LC, Boorjian SA. Comparative cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Results according to VESPER data. Cancer 2022; 128:4194-4202. [PMID: 36251574 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The VESPER trial demonstrated improved progression-free (PFS) and (preliminarily) overall survival (OS) with six cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVACx6) versus four cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCx4) before radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but with increased toxicity. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of these regimens. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant ddMVACx6 and GCx4 was performed using a decision-analytic Markov model with 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. Probabilities were derived from reported VESPER data. Utility values were obtained from the literature. Primary outcomes were effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS At 5 years, ddMVACx6 improved QALYs by 0.30 at an additional cost of $16,100, rendering it cost-effective relative to GCx4 (ICER: $53,284/QALY). Additionally, probabilistic sensitivity analysis found ddMVACx6 to be cost-effective in 79% and 81% of microsimulations at10-year and lifetime horizons, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated a minimum difference in 5-year progression of 0.9% and progression mortality of 0.7% between ddMVACx6 and GCx4 was necessary for ddMVACx6 to remain cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant ddMVACx6 was more cost-effective than GCx4 for MIBC. These data, together with the improved PFS and (albeit preliminary) OS noted in VESPER, support use of this regimen in appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy before RC. LAY SUMMARY We performed a benefit-to-cost analysis using evidence from a randomized controlled trial that compared two different chemotherapy treatments before bladder removal for bladder cancer that had invaded into the bladder muscle. Despite being more expensive and having a greater likelihood of toxicity, six cycles of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was more cost-effective (or had higher value) than four cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Joyce
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kevin M Wymer
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - James P Moriarty
- Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bijan J Borah
- Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Daniel M Geynisman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Plimack
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fasanella D, Marchioni M, Domanico L, Franzini C, Inferrera A, Schips L, Greco F. Neobladder "Function": Tips and Tricks for Surgery and Postoperative Management. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12081193. [PMID: 36013372 PMCID: PMC9409805 DOI: 10.3390/life12081193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction is a continent urinary diversion procedure increasingly used in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer following radical cystectomy (RC). It represents a valid alternative to the ileal duct in suitable patients who do not prefer a stoma and are motivated to undergo adequate training of the neobladder. Careful patient selection, taking into account the absolute and relative contraindications for ONB as well as an adequate recovery protocol after surgery are integral to the success of this procedure and the oncological and functional outcomes. The objective of this review is to summarize the current data on RC with ONB in terms of patient selection, preoperative preparation, surgical techniques and functional (continence and sexual activity) and oncological outcomes, with particular attention to the management of complications and the impact on quality of life (QoL).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Fasanella
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, SS Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, SS Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Luigi Domanico
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudia Franzini
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Antonino Inferrera
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, SS Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3317918535
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Progression-free survival is an adequate endpoint for clinical trials of locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:500-503. [DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
10
|
Comparing Long-Term Survival Outcomes for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Who Underwent with Radical Cystectomy and Bladder-Sparing Trimodality Therapy: A Multicentre Cohort Analysis. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:7306198. [PMID: 35607328 PMCID: PMC9124076 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7306198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Although radical cystectomy (RC) is the clinical practice guideline-recommended treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), bladder-sparing trimodality therapy (TMT) has emerged as a valid treatment option. Findings comparing the survival outcomes for MIBC patients who underwent RC and TMT are inconclusive. Objective We designed a large hospital-based multicohort study to compare the effectiveness of TMT with RC. Methods Information on deaths was jointly retrieved from EMR (electronic medical record), cause of death registry, and chronic disease surveillance as well as study-specific questionnaire. To avoid the systematical difference between patients who received two modalities, RC-MIBC cohort was propensity score-matched to TMT-MIBC cohort, and the Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results There were 891 MIBC patients treated with RC and another 891 MIBC patients who underwent with TMT in the propensity score matching. Comparable effectiveness between two modalities was observed for DSS (HR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94 to 1.49) and OS (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.43) according to multiple adjustment after a median follow-up of approximately 9.3 years. However, a relatively higher mortality rate around 5 years after TMT treatment was found compared to RC (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.53). The respective 5-year OS rates were 69% and 73% for TMT cohort and RC cohort, respectively. Conclusions Our findings supported that MIBC patients with TMT yielded survival outcomes comparable to MIBC patients who underwent RC overall. Treatment options should be suggested considering patients' age and willingness.
Collapse
|
11
|
Joshi M, Polimera H, Krupski T, Necchi A. Geography Should Not Be an "Oncologic Destiny" for Urothelial Cancer: Improving Access to Care by Removing Local, Regional, and International Barriers. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-14. [PMID: 35471833 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_350478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Urothelial cancer care is particularly susceptible to geographical health disparity given its complex nature, requiring access to several specialists such as a urologist, a medical oncologist, a radiation oncologist, a surgical oncologist, and multidisciplinary care teams. Furthermore, other barriers to care access in underserved areas include travel burden, longer wait times, late-stage disease at the time of diagnosis, cost, type of treatment, less enrollment in clinical trials, lack of follow-up among cancer survivors, and less research funding in this area. Here, we discuss the impact of geographical location on access to urothelial cancer care, management decisions, and outcomes and we reflect on how to address geographical disparities in care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA
| | - Hyma Polimera
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA
| | - Tracey Krupski
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chemotherapy is superior to checkpoint inhibitors after radical surgery for urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic and toxicity outcomes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103570. [PMID: 34902554 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the oncologic and toxicity outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients treated with radical surgery for urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS We used the Bayesian approach in the network meta-analysis of different therapy regimens compared to observation or placebo. RESULTS Nine studies comprised of 2,444 patients met the eligibility criteria. In bladder UC, chemotherapy, atezolizumab, and nivolumab did not improve disease progression compared to observation/placebo. In upper tract UC (UTUC), chemotherapy was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of disease progression compared to observation/placebo, while atezolizumab and nivolumab were not. Based on the analysis of the treatment ranking, adjuvant chemotherapy appeared as the best treatment approach in both bladder UC and UTUC. The risk of adverse events with ICIs was comparable to that of observation/placebo. CONCLUSION Our analysis suggests a superior oncologic benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy over ICIs in patients treated with radical surgery for both bladder UC and UTUC.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kumar N. Checkmate 274 trial: Is Nivolumab the new standard in adjuvant setting for high-risk muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma? Indian J Urol 2021; 37:369-371. [PMID: 34759535 PMCID: PMC8555569 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_288_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Kumar
- Department of Urology, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Sasaram, Bihar, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khaki AR, Shan Y, Nelson RE, Kaul S, Gore JL, Grivas P, Williams SB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition vs. cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:732.e9-732.e16. [PMID: 33766465 PMCID: PMC8455700 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple single-arm clinical trials showed promising pathologic complete response rates with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing neoadjuvant ICIs with cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CBC). METHODS We applied a decision analytic simulation model with a health care payer perspective to compare neoadjuvant ICIs vs. CBC. For the primary analysis we compared pembrolizumab with ddMVAC. We performed a secondary analysis with gemcitabine/cisplatin as CBC and exploratory analyses with atezolizumab or nivolumab/ipilimumab as ICI. We input pathologic complete response rates from trials or meta-analysis and costs from average sales price. Outcomes of interest included costs, 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of cost per 2-year RFS. A threshold analysis estimated a price reduction for ICI to be cost-effective and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS The incremental cost of pembrolizumab compared with ddMVAC was $8,041 resulting in an incremental improvement of 1.5% in 2-year RFS for an ICER of $522,143 per 2-year RFS. A 21% reduction in cost of pembrolizumab would render it more cost-effective with an ICER of $100,000 per 2-year RFS. GC required an 89% pembrolizumab cost reduction to achieve an ICER of $100,000 per 2-year RFS. Atezolizumab appeared to be more cost-effective than ddMVAC. CONCLUSIONS ICIs were not cost-effective as neoadjuvant therapies, except when atezolizumab was compared with ddMVAC. Randomized clinical trials, larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are required to better understand the value of ICIs as neoadjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Yong Shan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Richard E Nelson
- IDEAS Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Sapna Kaul
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kartolo A, Kassouf W, Vera-Badillo FE. Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Is It Ready for Prime Time? Eur Urol 2021; 80:679-681. [PMID: 34366212 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We discuss results from the Checkmate-274 and IMvigor010 trials on adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and conclude that adjuvant ICI (nivolumab but not atezolizumab) should be considered for patients with resected high-risk MIBC, especially for those who have received NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi Kartolo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dellis A, Zakopoulou R, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Tzannis K, Koutsoukos K, Fragkoulis C, Kostouros E, Papatsoris A, Varkarakis I, Stravodimos K, Boutati E, Pagoni S, Seferlis M, Chrisofos M, Kouloulias V, Ntoumas K, Deliveliotis C, Constantinides C, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A. Referral for "Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy" for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer to a Multidisciplinary Board: Patterns, Management and Outcomes. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:5941-5955. [PMID: 34354376 PMCID: PMC8331106 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s317500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer in everyday practice differs from that of clinical trials. We describe the patterns of referral for “neoadjuvant chemotherapy”, treatment and outcomes in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Methods This was an observational study. Patients referred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy received 4 cycles of dose-dense gemcitabine/cisplatin and were then assessed for definitive local therapy. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Primary objective was a 3-year disease-free survival rate. Results Forty-six patients (clinical stages II: 28, IIIA: 9, IIIB: 4, IVA: 3, missing: 2) were included. Following chemotherapy, 30 underwent radical cystectomy, 8 radiotherapy and 8 no further therapy. Pathological downstaging was observed in 14 (46.6%) of the 30 patients who underwent radical cystectomy; clinical TNM staging was correlated with disease-free survival in the whole population, while clinical and pathological stages, as well as pathological downstaging, were correlated with disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Three-year disease-free survival rates for the whole cohort and for patients undergoing radical cystectomy were 67.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51–79.2) and 65.2 (95% CI: 44.9–79.6), respectively. Conclusion Real-world muscle invasive bladder cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy are characterized by more advanced diseases and less frequent radical surgery than those included in clinical trials. Nevertheless, outcomes were comparable and, therefore, offering patients with stage II–IVA muscle invasive bladder cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy after assessment by multidisciplinary tumor boards should be strongly encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Dellis
- 2nd Department of Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Andromahi Kougioumtzopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Kimon Tzannis
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Koutsoukos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Efthymios Kostouros
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Varkarakis
- 2nd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Stravodimos
- First Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Laiko" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Boutati
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stamata Pagoni
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece
| | | | - Michael Chrisofos
- 3rd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Kouloulias
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Ntoumas
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece
| | - Charalambos Deliveliotis
- 2nd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Constantine Constantinides
- First Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Laiko" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, Schenker M, Valderrama BP, Tomita Y, Bamias A, Lebret T, Shariat SF, Park SH, Ye D, Agerbaek M, Enting D, McDermott R, Gajate P, Peer A, Milowsky MI, Nosov A, Neif Antonio J, Tupikowski K, Toms L, Fischer BS, Qureshi A, Collette S, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Broughton E, Zardavas D, Koon HB, Galsky MD. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:2102-2114. [PMID: 34077643 PMCID: PMC8215888 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2034442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 450] [Impact Index Per Article: 150.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. METHODS In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. RESULTS A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P<0.001). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 74.5% and 55.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; P<0.001). The median survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract in the intention-to-treat population was 22.9 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 33.4) with nivolumab and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 20.3) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract at 6 months was 77.0% with nivolumab and 62.7% with placebo (hazard ratio for recurrence outside the urothelial tract or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 75.3% and 56.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 17.9% of the nivolumab group and 7.2% of the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis were noted in the nivolumab group. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 274 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02632409.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean F Bajorin
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Michael Schenker
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Thierry Lebret
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Se Hoon Park
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Dingwei Ye
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Mads Agerbaek
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Deborah Enting
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Ray McDermott
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Pablo Gajate
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Avivit Peer
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Alexander Nosov
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - João Neif Antonio
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Krzysztof Tupikowski
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Laurence Toms
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Bruce S Fischer
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Anila Qureshi
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Sandra Collette
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Keziban Unsal-Kacmaz
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Edward Broughton
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Dimitrios Zardavas
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Henry B Koon
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gottlieb J, Kovac E, Aboumohamed A, Schoenberg M, Gartrell B, Bodner W, Guha C, Mehta K, Garg M, Sankin A. Erratum: Outcomes of Trimodal Therapy for cT2-3 Urothelial Carcinoma in a Racially Diverse Population: A Single Institution Experience in the Bronx. Bladder Cancer 2021. [PMID: 33999040 DOI: 10.3233/blc-200332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3233/BLC-200332.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Gottlieb
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Evan Kovac
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Ahmed Aboumohamed
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Mark Schoenberg
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Gartrell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - William Bodner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Keyur Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Madhur Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Sankin
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Following platinum-based regimens becoming the reference standard of care, it has taken almost four decades to find a systemic treatment that improved overall survival in metastatic urothelial tumors. Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors have not only improved overall survival but also the quality of life of patients with metastatic urothelial tumors after failure of platinum-based regimens and as a maintenance therapy after four to six cycles of standard first-line chemotherapy. In addition, very promising data are emerging when single-agent immunotherapy is offered as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for patients with muscle-invasive disease and also in the non-muscle-invasive setting. There is an extensive debate about the role of PD-L1 expression as a reliable biomarker to predict the activity of immune-based regimens. Furthermore, the lack of consensus concerning its utility means that there is a need for more and better tools to identify patients who are likely to benefit from these novel approaches. The field of urothelial tumors now additionally exploits novel antibody-drug conjugates and fibroblast growth factor-receptor inhibitors that are being tested in combination with immunotherapy. This added complexity contributes to an enormous increase in the challenges that will be faced shortly.
Collapse
|
20
|
Tripathi A, Khaki AR, Grivas P. Perioperative Immunotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:131-133. [PMID: 33642222 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have already been approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma and are now being investigated for perioperative treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Ongoing trials are assessing ICIs as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments. Early data are promising, and long-term survival data are awaited to confirm the potential of ICIs in MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Tripathi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology Oncology, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Al-Adra DP, Hammel L, Roberts J, Woodle ES, Levine D, Mandelbrot D, Verna E, Locke J, D'Cunha J, Farr M, Sawinski D, Agarwal PK, Plichta J, Pruthi S, Farr D, Carvajal R, Walker J, Zwald F, Habermann T, Gertz M, Bierman P, Dizon DS, Langstraat C, Al-Qaoud T, Eggener S, Richgels JP, Chang GJ, Geltzeiler C, Sapisochin G, Ricciardi R, Krupnick AS, Kennedy C, Mohindra N, Foley DP, Watt KD. Pretransplant solid organ malignancy and organ transplant candidacy: A consensus expert opinion statement. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:460-474. [PMID: 32969590 PMCID: PMC8576374 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Patients undergoing evaluation for solid organ transplantation (SOT) often have a history of malignancy. Although the cancer has been treated in these patients, the benefits of transplantation need to be balanced against the risk of tumor recurrence, especially in the setting of immunosuppression. Prior guidelines of when to transplant patients with a prior treated malignancy do not take in to account current staging, disease biology, or advances in cancer treatments. To develop contemporary recommendations, the American Society of Transplantation held a consensus workshop to perform a comprehensive review of current literature regarding cancer therapies, cancer stage-specific prognosis, the kinetics of cancer recurrence, and the limited data on the effects of immunosuppression on cancer-specific outcomes. This document contains prognosis based on contemporary treatment and transplant recommendations for breast, colorectal, anal, urological, gynecological, and nonsmall cell lung cancers. This conference and consensus documents aim to provide recommendations to assist in the evaluation of patients for SOT given a history of a pretransplant malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Al-Adra
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Laura Hammel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - John Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - E Steve Woodle
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Deborah Levine
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Didier Mandelbrot
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Elizabeth Verna
- Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia, New York, New York
| | - Jayme Locke
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Maryjane Farr
- Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia, New York, New York
| | - Deirdre Sawinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jennifer Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sandhya Pruthi
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Deborah Farr
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Richard Carvajal
- Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia, New York, New York
| | - John Walker
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Fiona Zwald
- Piedmont Transplant Institute, Piedmont Atlanta Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Morie Gertz
- Hematology Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Philip Bierman
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Don S Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Carrie Langstraat
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Talal Al-Qaoud
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Scott Eggener
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John P Richgels
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cristina Geltzeiler
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Rocco Ricciardi
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Cassie Kennedy
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nisha Mohindra
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David P Foley
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brodie A, Kijvikai K, Decaestecker K, Vasdev N. Review of the evidence for robotic-assisted robotic cystectomy and intra-corporeal urinary diversion in bladder cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:2946-2955. [PMID: 33457267 PMCID: PMC7807361 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The surgery is both complex and highly morbid. Robotic cystectomy is now in its 16th year with established techniques and sufficient research maturity to enable comparison with its open counterpart. The present review focuses on the current evidence for robotic cystectomy and assesses various metrics including oncological, perioperative, functional, surgeon-specific and cost outcomes. The review also encapsulates the current evidence for intra-corporeal urinary diversion and its current status in the cystectomy arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Brodie
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Kittinut Kijvikai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Reply to Alexander Andreev-Drakhlin, Jianjun Gao, Arlene Siefker-Radtke. Levelling the Evidence: A Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2021;79:655-6. Eur Urol 2020; 79:657-658. [PMID: 33077305 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
24
|
Sonpavde G, Necchi A, Gupta S, Steinberg GD, Gschwend JE, Van Der Heijden MS, Garzon N, Ibrahim M, Raybold B, Liaw D, Rutstein M, Galsky MD. ENERGIZE: a Phase III study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or with nivolumab with/without linrodostat mesylate for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Future Oncol 2020; 16:4359-4368. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In cisplatin-eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy improves overall survival. Tumor PD-L1 expression increases in MIBC after NAC, suggesting potential synergy in combining PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors with NAC. IDO1 is overexpressed in bladder cancer and is associated with poor outcomes. Linrodostat mesylate (BMS-986205) – a selective, potent, oral IDO1 inhibitor – combined with nivolumab has demonstrated safety and preliminary evidence of clinical activity in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Here, we discuss the rationale and trial design of the ENERGIZE, a Phase III trial investigating the efficacy of NAC in combination with nivolumab with or without linrodostat followed by postsurgery nivolumab or nivolumab with linrodostat in cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC. Clinical trial registration number: NCT03661320
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guru Sonpavde
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Genitourinary Oncology Division, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | | | - Michiel Simon Van Der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Danny Liaw
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
| | | | - Matt D Galsky
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nguyen EK, Yu H, Pond G, Shayegan B, Pinthus JH, Kapoor A, Mukherjee SD, Neville A, Lalani AKA, Hotte SJ, Corbett TB, Dayes IS, Lukka HR. Outcomes of trimodality bladder-sparing therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 14:122-129. [PMID: 31702551 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although radical cystectomy is considered the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), recent data has suggested comparable survival outcomes for bladder-sparing trimodality therapy (TMT). We conducted a retrospective, single-institution analysis of MIBC patients to evaluate the efficacy of TMT as an alternative, curative approach to surgical intervention. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of MIBC patients assessed by a multidisciplinary team at the Juravinski Cancer Centre from 2010-2016. Patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Patients could receive neoadjuvant treatment. Clinical data and response rates were summarized, and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Our analytic cohort included 115 patients, of whom 53 underwent TMT and 62 underwent radiotherapy alone following TURBT. Median age at diagnosis was 79 years and median followup was 21 months. Complete response rates in those receiving TMT and radiation without chemotherapy were 84.4% and 66.7%, respectively. For TMT patients, three-year OS and DFS were 68.5% and 49.6%, respectively. Patients who received TMT had reduction in risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; p=0.026) and disease recurrence (HR 0.55; p=0.017) compared to those who had radiation without chemotherapy. Overall, four patients had grade 3 or higher late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS In this single-institution analysis, TMT appears to be a safe and effective approach in the short-term management of MIBC in appropriately selected patients. Extended followup and analysis are necessary to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric K Nguyen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Hang Yu
- Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gregory Pond
- Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jehonathan H Pinthus
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Som D Mukherjee
- Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alan Neville
- Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Aly-Khan A Lalani
- Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastien J Hotte
- Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas B Corbett
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ian S Dayes
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Himanshu R Lukka
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Accurate Quantification of Residual Cancer Cells in Pelvic Washing Reveals Association with Cancer Recurrence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy. J Urol 2019; 201:1105-1114. [PMID: 30730413 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Bladder cancer recurrence following cystectomy remains a significant cause of bladder cancer specific mortality. Residual cancer cells contribute to cancer recurrence due to tumor spillage or undetectable preexisting micrometastatic tumor clones. We detected and quantified residual cancer cells in pelvic washing using ultradeep targeted sequencing. We compared the levels of residual cancer cells with clinical variables and cancer recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS The primary tumor specimen was available in 17 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy. All tumors had negative surgical margins. Pelvic washes and blood were collected intraoperatively before and after robot-assisted radical cystectomy, after pelvic lymph node dissection and in the suction fluid collected during the procedure. Two-step sequencing, including whole exome sequencing followed by ultradeep targeted sequencing (× greater than 50,000), was done to quantify residual cancer cells in each sample. Eight patients were excluded from study due to sample quality issues. The final analysis cohort comprised 9 patients. The residual cancer cell level was quantified for each sample as the relative cancer cell fraction and compared between time points. The peak relative cancer cell fraction of each patient was correlated with clinical and pathological variables. RESULTS Residual cancer cells were detected in approximately half of the pelvic washing specimens during or after but not before robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Higher residual cancer cell levels were associated with aggressive variant histology and cancer recurrence. Verifying the feasibility of using residual cancer cells as a novel biomarker for recurrence requires larger cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Detection of residual cancer cells in intraoperative peritoneal washes of patients with bladder cancer who undergo radical cystectomy may represent a robust biomarker of tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential.
Collapse
|
27
|
Influence of laparoscopic access in cancer-specific mortality of patients with pTa-2pN0R0 bladder cancer treated with radical cistectomy. Actas Urol Esp 2019; 43:241-247. [PMID: 30910257 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery represents an attractive surgical approach in radical cystectomy. However, its effect on the oncological results is still controversial due to the lack of definite analyses. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the laparoscopic approach on cancer-specific mortality. MATERIAL AND METHOD A retrospective cohort study of two groups of patients in a pT0-2pN0R0 stage, undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC) (n=191) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) (n=74). Using Cox regression, an analysis has been carried out to identify the predictor variables in the first place, and consequently, the independent predictor variables related to survival. RESULTS 90.9% were males with a median age of 65years and a median follow-up period of 65.5 (IQR27.75-122) months. Patients with laparoscopic access presented a significantly higher ASA index (P=.0001), a longer time between TUR and cystectomy (P=.04), a lower rate of intraoperative transfusion (P=.0001), a lower pT stage (P=.002) and a lower incidence of infection associated with surgical wounds (P=.04). When analyzing the different risk factors associated with cancer-specific mortality, we only found the ORC approach (versus LRC) as an independent predictor of cancer-specific mortality (P=.007). Open approach to cystectomy multiplied the risk of mortality by 3.27. CONCLUSIONS In our series, the laparoscopic approach does not represent a risk factor compared to the open approach in pT0-2N0R0 patients.
Collapse
|
28
|
Hosseini A, Ebbing J, Collins J. Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and continent urinary diversion. Scand J Urol 2019; 53:81-88. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1598486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Abolfazl Hosseini
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institut, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Ebbing
- Urology, Universitat Basel Medizinische Fakultat, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Justin Collins
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institut, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2019; 37:1557-1570. [PMID: 30976902 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02708-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The efficacy of RARC in oncologic outcomes compared ORC is controversial. We assess potential differences in oncologic outcomes between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC). METHODS We performed the literature search systematically according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. A pooled meta-analysis was performed to assess the difference in oncologic outcomes between RARC and ORC, separately in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRCTs). RESULTS Five RCTs and 28 NRCTs were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was no difference in the rate of overall positive surgical margin (PSM) in RCTs, while NRCTs showed a lower rate for RARC. There was no difference in the soft tissue PSM rate between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. There was no difference in the lymph node yield by standard and extended lymph node dissection between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. There was no significant difference in survival outcomes between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current evidence, there is no difference in the rate of PSMs, lymph node yield, recurrence rate and location as well as short-term survival outcomes between RARC and ORC in RCTs. In NRCTs, only PSM rates were better for RARC compared to ORC, but this was likely due to selection and reporting bias which are inherent to retrospective study designs.
Collapse
|
30
|
Influence of the laparoscopic approach on cancer-specific mortality of patients with stage pt3-4 bladder cancer treated with cystectomy. Actas Urol Esp 2019; 43:71-76. [PMID: 30327148 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIM The main aim of the study was to establish the oncological safety of the laparoscopic approach to radical cystectomy for high-risk, non-organ-confined urothelial tumours. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study of 216 stage pT3-4 cystectomies operated between 2003 and 2016; using an open approach (ORC, n=108), and using a laparoscopic approach (LRC, n=108). RESULTS Both groups have similar pathological features except, in G3 TUR, there were more lyphadenectomies and greater pN+, and more adjuvant chemotherapies using the LRC. The median follow-up of the series was 15 (IQR: 8-10.5) months. Sixty-eight point one percent of the series relapsed, with no differences between either group (p=.11). The estimated differences for cancer-specific survival was greater in the LRC group (p=.03), as was overall survival (p=.009). There were no differences between either group in estimated recurrence-free survival (p=.26). The type of surgical approach (p=.03), pTpN stage (p=.0001), and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p=.003) were related to cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in the univariate analysis. Only the pTpN stage (p=.0001), and not giving adjuvant chemotherapy (p=.003) behaved as independent predictive factors of CSM. CONCLUSION The type of surgical approach to cystectomy (ORC vs. LRC) did not influence CSM. Lymph node involvement and not giving adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as predictive factors of CSM. Our study supports the oncological safety of the laparascopic approach for cystectomy in patients with locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder tumours.
Collapse
|
31
|
Leow JJ, Bedke J, Chamie K, Collins JW, Daneshmand S, Grivas P, Heidenreich A, Messing EM, Royce TJ, Sankin AI, Schoenberg MP, Shipley WU, Villers A, Efstathiou JA, Bellmunt J, Stenzl A. SIU–ICUD consultation on bladder cancer: treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2019; 37:61-83. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2606-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
|
32
|
Al-Daghmin A, Alhamss S, Al-Najjar H, Al-Saidi I, Al-Qasem K, Abukhiran I, Hamad A, Alhusban M. Survival and metastasis in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who present with indeterminate pulmonary nodules before treatment. Ann Saudi Med 2019; 39:42-47. [PMID: 30712050 PMCID: PMC6464682 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are common during initial evaluation of bladder cancer patients. Their significance is still unknown. OBJECTIVE Determine the significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, including their size and number, in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients before definitive local therapy by surgery or chemo-radiotherapy. DESIGN Retrospective review, single-center descriptive study. SETTINGS A tertiary cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent definitive local therapy of bladder cancer by either radical cystectomy and lymph node dissection or with chemo-radiotherapy between January 1997 and December 2015. We identified patients with baseline CT scans done during staging work-up prior to definitive treatment. Patients with proven clinical metastasis at pre.sentation were excluded, while patients who had IPNs without features suggesting metastasis were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Disease-free survival and overall survival. SAMPLE SIZE 168 patients. RESULTS The median age of patients at diagnosis was 66 years; 92% were males and 56% were smokers. IPNs (3 cm or less) were present in 74 patients (44.0%). Median follow-up was 24 months. IPNs were associated with decreased disease-free survival while IPNs did not affect the overall survival (HR=1.9; 95% CI: 1.1-3.4); P=.01 and HR=1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.5); P=.07, respectively. In addition, nodules greater than 1 cm had reduced disease-free survival (HR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9); P=.04. In the surgery group (n=126), the median number of lymph nodes excised was 14, with no association between lymph nodes status and the presence of IPNs (P=.08). CONCLUSION The presence of IPNs, especially nodules greater than 1 cm had a negative effect on disease-free survival. Tailored postoperative follow-up of these patients may impact disease outcomes. LIMITATIONS The retrospective nature, the lack of standardized preoperative imaging protocols, the lack of a central radiology review and the small number of patients. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Al-Daghmin
- Dr. Ali Al-daghmin, Department of Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center, 1269 Al-Jubeiha, Amman, Jordan, T: +962796230136, aa.11119@khcc. jo, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8716-6713
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Linares-Espinós E, Sánchez-Salas R. Re: Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Bladder Cancer (RAZOR): An Open-label, Randomised, Phase 3, Non-inferiority Trial. Eur Urol 2018; 75:199. [PMID: 30144958 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
34
|
Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, Gonzalgo ML, Woods ME, Svatek RS, Weizer AZ, Konety BR, Tollefson M, Krupski TL, Smith ND, Shabsigh A, Barocas DA, Quek ML, Dash A, Kibel AS, Shemanski L, Pruthi RS, Montgomery JS, Weight CJ, Sharp DS, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Gupta GN, Gorbonos A, Uchio EM, Skinner E, Venkatramani V, Soodana-Prakash N, Kendrick K, Smith JA, Thompson IM. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018; 391:2525-2536. [PMID: 29976469 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30996-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 476] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy is the surgical standard for invasive bladder cancer. Robot-assisted cystectomy has been proposed to provide similar oncological outcomes with lower morbidity. We aimed to compare progression-free survival in patients with bladder cancer treated with open cystectomy and robot-assisted cystectomy. METHODS The RAZOR study is a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial done in 15 medical centres in the USA. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had biopsy-proven clinical stage T1-T4, N0-N1, M0 bladder cancer or refractory carcinoma in situ. Individuals who had previously had open abdominal or pelvic surgery, or who had any pre-existing health conditions that would preclude safe initiation or maintenance of pneumoperitoneum were excluded. Patients were centrally assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, with block randomisation by institution, stratified by type of urinary diversion, clinical T stage, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, to receive robot-assisted radical cystectomy or open radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Treatment allocation was only masked from pathologists. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival, with non-inferiority established if the lower bound of the one-sided 97·5% CI for the treatment difference (robotic cystectomy minus open cystectomy) was greater than -15 percentage points. The primary analysis was done in the per-protocol population. Safety was assessed in the same population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01157676. FINDINGS Between July 1, 2011, and Nov 18, 2014, 350 participants were randomly assigned to treatment. The intended treatment was robotic cystectomy in 176 patients and open cystectomy in 174 patients. 17 (10%) of 176 patients in the robotic cystectomy group did not have surgery and nine (5%) patients had a different surgery to that they were assigned. 21 (12%) of 174 patients in the open cystectomy group did not have surgery and one (1%) patient had robotic cystectomy instead of open cystectomy. Thus, 302 patients (150 in the robotic cystectomy group and 152 in the open cystectomy group) were included in the per-protocol analysis set. 2-year progression-free survival was 72·3% (95% CI 64·3 to 78·8) in the robotic cystectomy group and 71·6% (95% CI 63·6 to 78·2) in the open cystectomy group (difference 0·7%, 95% CI -9·6% to 10·9%; pnon-inferiority=0·001), indicating non-inferiority of robotic cystectomy. Adverse events occurred in 101 (67%) of 150 patients in the robotic cystectomy group and 105 (69%) of 152 patients in the open cystectomy group. The most common adverse events were urinary tract infection (53 [35%] in the robotic cystectomy group vs 39 [26%] in the open cystectomy group) and postoperative ileus (33 [22%] in the robotic cystectomy group vs 31 [20%] in the open cystectomy group). INTERPRETATION In patients with bladder cancer, robotic cystectomy was non-inferior to open cystectomy for 2-year progression-free survival. Increased adoption of robotic surgery in clinical practice should lead to future randomised trials to assess the true value of this surgical approach in patients with other cancer types. FUNDING National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipen J Parekh
- Department of Urology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Isildinha M Reis
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Sylvester Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Erik P Castle
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael E Woods
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alon Z Weizer
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Tracey L Krupski
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Norm D Smith
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ahmad Shabsigh
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Marcus L Quek
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Atreya Dash
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Raj S Pruthi
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - David S Sharp
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, Oklahoma University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Gopal N Gupta
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Alex Gorbonos
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Edward M Uchio
- Department of Urology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Eila Skinner
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vivek Venkatramani
- Department of Urology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash
- Department of Urology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kerri Kendrick
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Joseph A Smith
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ian M Thompson
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Medical Center Hospital, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lotan Y, Woldu SL, Sanli O, Black P, Milowsky MI. Modelling cost-effectiveness of a biomarker-based approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2018; 122:434-440. [PMID: 29603871 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To model the cost-effectiveness of a biomarker-based approach to select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We obtained data from the most recent clinical studies on patients with locally advanced MIBC treated by RC, including stage distributions, overall survival (OS) estimates, associated costs, and utilisation/response to NAC. Additionally, we estimated the putative efficacy of three biomarkers to select patients for NAC: DNA-repair gene panel [ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), retinoblastoma 1 (RB1), and Fanconi anaemia complementation group C (FANCC)], excision repair cross-complementation group 2 (ERCC2), and ribonucleic acid (RNA) subtypes. A decision analysis model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biomarker-based approaches to select patients with MIBC for NAC. Comparison of cost-effectiveness included RC alone, unselected NAC plus RC, and NAC based on the three aforementioned biomarkers. RESULTS The DNA-repair gene panel-based approach to NAC was the most cost-effective strategy (mean OS of 3.14 years, $31 482/life year). Under this approach, 38% would undergo NAC, about twice the number of patients who are currently receiving NAC for MIBC. Such an approach would improve mean OS by 5.2, 1.6, and 4.4 months compared to RC alone, a hypothetical scenario where all patients received NAC, and compared to current estimates of NAC utilisation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A biomarker-based strategy to identify patients with MIBC who should undergo NAC was more cost-effective than unselected use of NAC or RC alone. As further data becomes available, such a model may serve as a basis for incorporating biomarkers into clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Oner Sanli
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Peter Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Audenet F, Sfakianos JP. Evidence of Atypical Recurrences After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Bladder Cancer 2017; 3:231-236. [PMID: 29152547 PMCID: PMC5676761 DOI: 10.3233/blc-170127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has seen remarkable growth in the last decade. Despite a low level of evidence, numerous publications reporting on outcomes after RARC are now available. While definitive data on the long-term oncologic safety and efficacy of this technique are still lacking, similar oncological and functional outcomes compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC) have been reported. Several studies have also reported on atypical recurrences after RARC, including peritoneal carcinomatosis, extra-pelvic lymph node metastasis and port-site metastasis. While distant metastases overall do not appear to be affected by technique, it is possible that RARC may be associated with an increased risk of some atypical recurrences and this should be prospectively studied in RARC. However, atypical recurrences are rare events and are infrequent in their description. To date, there is no convincing evidence that, in the hands of equally experienced surgeons who treat bladder cancer routinely, a skillfully performed RARC is less oncologically efficacious than a skillfully performed ORC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Balbay MD, Koc E, Canda AE. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: patient selection and special considerations. ROBOTIC SURGERY (AUCKLAND) 2017; 4:101-106. [PMID: 30697568 PMCID: PMC6193425 DOI: 10.2147/rsrr.s119858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Robot-assisted (RA) procedures are increasingly being performed as minimally invasive surgical approaches. Less insensible losses due to a closed abdomen, smaller incisions with less retractor strain, decreased analgesic requirements, and earlier postoperative ambulation are suggested advantages of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Patients who undergo open radical cystectomy are also candidates for RARC procedure. However, the steep Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum develop a non-physiological condition. Intra-abdominal adhesions preventing the placement of the ports and patients who cannot tolerate the pneumoperitoneum and/or steep Trendelenburg position are special contraindications of RARC. Besides, body mass index >30 kg/m2, presence of extravesical disease, bulky lymphadenopathy, previous vascular surgery, previous distal colorectal surgery, previous pelvic radiation, previous pelvic trauma, and/or preexisting cardiovascular/pulmonary disease that is compromised with positioning are not certainly contraindicated but unwanted conditions in which the RARC may be performed successfully as the surgeons gain experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erdem Koc
- Department of Urology, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Erdem Canda
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Characterization of Late Recurrence After Radical Cystectomy in a Large Multicenter Cohort of Bladder Cancer Patients. Urology 2017; 106:119-124. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 04/01/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
39
|
Mokhtar A, Al MM, Al WM, Othman KA, Kattan SA, Al MF. Is survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Saudi patients different from that of Western patients? Ann Saudi Med 2017; 37:194-200. [PMID: 28578357 PMCID: PMC6150585 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2017.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although radical cystectomy (RC) is considered the gold standard treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer, nearly half of patients develop metastases and ultimately die within 2 years. OBJECTIVE To assess survival, evaluate different prognostic factors that may affect disease-free survival (DFS) in Saudi patients after RC for carcinoma of the bladder and to compare our results with those of Western countries. DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING A tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS We collected data on patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer in the period between 1979 and 2014. Demographic, clinical and pathological variables and the application of perioperative chemotherapy were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done with DFS as the end point. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Disease-specific survival. RESULTS On 328 patients for whom data was available, the median follow up was 23 months (range, 2 month-28 years) and median age was 58 years (range, 21-90). Of these patients, 268 were males (81.7%), 235 (71.7%) had urothelial carcinoma (UC), 79 (24.1%) had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 208 (63.4%) had pathological tumor stage 3 or more. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and DFS were 52% and 48%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in DFS of patients with UC and pure SCC. On univariate analysis, lymph node status and pathological tumor stage were significant predictors of DFS. Both variables sustained statistical significance in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Survival following RC is almost the same as others. Moreover, pathological tumor stage and lymph node metastasis were the only independent predictors for survival following RC. Future cooperative prospective studies are required to gain data on our region. LIMITATIONS Relatively small sample size and retrospective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamed Matar Al
- Dr. Mohammed Faihan Al Otaibi, Consultant Urology,, Department of Urology,, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, PO Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia T: +966555787885 F: +966114424301
| | - Waleed Mohamad Al
- Dr. Mohammed Faihan Al Otaibi, Consultant Urology,, Department of Urology,, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, PO Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia T: +966555787885 F: +966114424301
| | | | | | - Mohammed Faihan Al
- Dr. Mohammed Faihan Al Otaibi, Consultant Urology,, Department of Urology,, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, PO Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia T: +966555787885 F: +966114424301
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kulkarni GS, Hermanns T, Wei Y, Bhindi B, Satkunasivam R, Athanasopoulos P, Bostrom PJ, Kuk C, Li K, Templeton AJ, Sridhar SS, van der Kwast TH, Chung P, Bristow RG, Milosevic M, Warde P, Fleshner NE, Jewett MAS, Bashir S, Zlotta AR. Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2299-2305. [PMID: 28410011 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.2327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Multidisciplinary management improves complex treatment decision making in cancer care, but its impact for bladder cancer (BC) has not been documented. Although radical cystectomy (RC) currently is viewed as the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), radiotherapy-based, bladder-sparing trimodal therapy (TMT) that combines transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy for radiation sensitization, and external beam radiotherapy has emerged as a valid treatment option. In the absence of randomized studies, this study compared the oncologic outcomes between patients treated with RC or TMT by using a propensity score matched-cohort analysis. Methods Data from patients treated in a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic (MDBCC) from 2008 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Those who received TMT for MIBC were identified and matched (for sex, cT and cN stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, Charlson comorbidity score, treatment date, age, carcinoma in situ status, and hydronephrosis) with propensity scores to patients who underwent RC. Overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards modeling and a competing risk analysis, respectively. Results A total of 112 patients with MIBC were included after matching (56 who had been treated with TMT, and 56 who underwent RC). The median age was 68.0 years, and 29.5% had stage cT3/cT4 disease. At a median follow-up of 4.51 years, there were 20 deaths (35.7%) in the RC group (13 as a result of BC) and 22 deaths (39.3%) in the TMT group (13 as a result of BC). The 5-year DSS rate was 73.2% and 76.6% in the RC and TMT groups, respectively ( P = .49). Salvage cystectomy was performed in 6 (10.7%) of 56 patients who received TMT. Conclusion In the setting of a MDBCC, TMT yielded survival outcomes similar to those of matched patients who underwent RC. Appropriately selected patients with MIBC should be offered the opportunity to discuss various treatment options, including organ-sparing TMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girish S Kulkarni
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yanliang Wei
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bimal Bhindi
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raj Satkunasivam
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Athanasopoulos
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter J Bostrom
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cynthia Kuk
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kathy Li
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arnoud J Templeton
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Theodorus H van der Kwast
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Milosevic
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shaheena Bashir
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Girish S. Kulkarni, Thomas Hermanns, Yanliang Wei, Bimal Bhindi, Raj Satkunasivam, Paul Athanasopoulos, Peter J. Bostrom, Kathy Li, Arnoud J. Templeton, Srikala S. Sridhar, Peter Chung, Robert G. Bristow, Michael Milosevic, Padraig Warde, Neil E. Fleshner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Shaheena Bashir, and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Cynthia Kuk and Alexandre R. Zlotta, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Orré M, Latorzeff I, Fléchon A, Roubaud G, Brouste V, Gaston R, Piéchaud T, Richaud P, Chapet O, Sargos P. Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective multicenter study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0174978. [PMID: 28384195 PMCID: PMC5383060 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph-node dissection (LND) is standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC). However, loco-regional recurrence (LRR) is a common early event associated with poor prognosis. We evaluate 3-year LRR-free (LRRFS), metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survivals (OS) after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for pathological high-risk MIBC. Material and methods We retrospectively reviewed data from patients in 3 institutions. Inclusion criteria were MIBC, histologically-proven urothelial carcinoma treated by RC and adjuvant RT. Patients with conservative surgery were excluded. Outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Acute toxicities were recorded according to CTCAE V4.0 scale. Results Between 2000 and 2013, 57 patients [median age 66.3 years (45–84)] were included. Post-operative pathological staging was ≤pT2, pT3 and pT4 in 16%, 44%, and 39%, respectively. PLND revealed 28% pN0, 26% pN1 and 42% pN2. Median number of lymph-nodes retrieved was 10 (2–33). Forty-eight patients (84%) received platin-based chemotherapy. For RT, clinical target volume 1 (CTV 1) encompassed pelvic lymph nodes for all patients. CTV 1 also included cystectomy bed for 37 patients (65%). CTV 1 median dose was 45 Gy (4–50). A boost of 16 Gy (5–22), corresponding to CTV 2, was administered for 30 patients, depending on pathological features. One third of patients received intensity-modulated RT. With median follow-up of 40.4 months, 8 patients (14%) had LRR. Three-year LRRFS, MFS and OS were 45% (95%CI 30–60), 37% (95%CI 24–51) and 49% (95%CI 33–63), respectively. Five (9%) patients had acute grade ≥3 toxicities (gastro-intestinal, genito-urinary and biological parameters). One patient died with intestinal fistula in a septic context. Conclusions Because of poor prognosis, an effective post-operative standard of care is needed for pathological high-risk MIBC. Adjuvant RT is feasible and may have oncological benefits. Prospective trials evaluating this approach with current RT techniques should be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Orré
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux,France
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Oncorad Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Véronique Brouste
- Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Richard Gaston
- Department of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thierry Piéchaud
- Department of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Richaud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux,France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiotherapy, CHU de Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux,France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sargos P, Larré S, Chapet O, Latorzeff I, Fléchon A, Roubaud G, Orré M, Belhomme S, Richaud P. [Adjuvant radiotherapy for bladder cancer in patients with risk of locoregional recurrence: Who, what and how?]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:67-72. [PMID: 28187997 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.08.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection remains the standard of care for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Locoregional control is a key factor in the outcome of patients since it is related to overall survival, metastasis-free survival and specific survival. Locoregional recurrence rate is directly correlated to pathological results and the quality of lymphadenectomy. In addition, while pre- or postoperative chemotherapy improved overall survival, it showed no impact on locoregional recurrence-free survival. Several recent publications have led to the development of a nomogram that predicts the risk of locoregional recurrence, in order to identify patients for which adjuvant radiotherapy could be beneficial. International cooperative groups have then come together to provide the rational for adjuvant radiotherapy, reinforced by recent technical developments limiting toxicity, and to develop prospective studies to reduce the risk of relapse. The aim of this critical literature review is to provide an overview of the elements in favor of adjuvant radiation for patients treated for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sargos
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
| | - S Larré
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, 45, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51100 Reims, France
| | - O Chapet
- Département de radiothérapie, CHU Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - I Latorzeff
- Département de radiothérapie, groupe Oncorad Garonne, clinique Pasteur, bâtiment Atrium, 1, rue de la Petite-Vitesse, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - A Fléchon
- Département d'oncologie médicale, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, promenade Léa-et-Napoléon-Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - M Orré
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - S Belhomme
- Département de physique médicale, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - P Richaud
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Parodi A, Traverso P, Kalli F, Conteduca G, Tardito S, Curto M, Grillo F, Mastracci L, Bernardi C, Nasi G, Minaglia F, Simonato A, Carmignani G, Ferrera F, Fenoglio D, Filaci G. Residual tumor micro-foci and overwhelming regulatory T lymphocyte infiltration are the causes of bladder cancer recurrence. Oncotarget 2016; 7:6424-35. [PMID: 26824503 PMCID: PMC4872724 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer has an unexplained, high recurrence rate. Causes of recurrence might include the presence of sporadic tumor micro-foci in the residual urothelial tissue after surgery associated with an inverted ratio between intratumoral effector and regulatory T cell subsets. Hence, surgical specimens of both tumors and autologous, macroscopically/histologically free-of-tumor tissues were collected from 28 and 20 patients affected by bladder or renal cancer, respectively. The frequencies of effector (IFNγ+ and IL17+ T cells) and regulatory (CD4+CD25hiCD127lo and CD8+CD28-CD127loCD39+ Treg) T cell subpopulations among tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were analyzed by immunofluorescence, while the gene expression of MAGE-A1 and MAGE-A2 tumor-associated antigens was studied by RT-PCR. The results show that both the T cell infiltrate and the frequency of MAGE-A1/A2 gene expression were comparable in tumors and in autologous free-of-tumor tissues in bladder cancer, while the autologous free-of-tumor renal tissues showed reduced T cell infiltrate and frequency of MAGE gene expression as compared to the autologous tumors. Importantly, the intra-tumor T effector/Treg cell ratio was consistently <1 in bladder cancer patients (n. 7) who relapsed within two years, while it was always >1 in patients (n. 6) without recurrence (regardless of tumor stage) (P = 0.0006, Odds ratio = 195). These unprecedented findings clarify the pathogenic mechanism of bladder cancer recurrence and suggest that microscopically undetectable micro-foci of tumor may predispose to recurrence when associated with an inverted intratumoral T effector/Treg cell ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Parodi
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Traverso
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Kalli
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Samuele Tardito
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Monica Curto
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federica Grillo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Mastracci
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Cinzia Bernardi
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Nasi
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Minaglia
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgio Carmignani
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferrera
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniela Fenoglio
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gilberto Filaci
- Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino - IST - Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Early Oncologic Failure after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2016; 197:1427-1436. [PMID: 27993668 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to investigate the prevalence and variables associated with early oncologic failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the IRCC (International Radical Cystectomy Consortium) database of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy since 2003. The final cohort comprised a total of 1,894 patients from 23 institutions in 11 countries. Early oncologic failure was defined as any disease relapse within 3 months of robot-assisted radical cystectomy. All institutions were surveyed for the pneumoperitoneum pressure used, breach of oncologic surgical principles, and techniques of specimen and lymph node removal. A multivariate model was fit to evaluate predictors of early oncologic failure. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to depict disease specific and overall survival, and Cox proportional regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of disease specific and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 305 patients (22%) experienced disease relapse, which was distant in 220 (16%), local recurrence in 154 (11%), peritoneal carcinomatosis in 17 (1%) and port site recurrence in 5 (0.4%). Early oncologic failure developed in 71 patients (5%) at a total of 10 institutions. The incidence of early oncologic failure decreased from 10% in 2006 to 6% in 2015. On multivariate analysis the presence of any complication (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.38-5.96, p = 0.004), pT3 or greater disease (OR 3.73, 95% CI 2.00-6.97, p <0.001) and nodal involvement (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.21-3.80, p = 0.008) was a significant predictor of early oncologic failure. Patients with early oncologic failure demonstrated worse disease specific and overall survival (23% and 13%, respectively) at 1 and 3 years compared to patients who experienced later or no recurrences (log rank p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of early oncologic failure following robot-assisted radical cystectomy has decreased with time. Disease related rather than technical related factors have a major role in early oncologic failure after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Collins JW, Hosseini A, Adding C, Nyberg T, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, Schumacher MC, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay M, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupić S, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Wiklund PN. Early Recurrence Patterns Following Totally Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) Scientific Working Group. Eur Urol 2016; 71:723-726. [PMID: 27816299 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Recurrence following radical cystectomy often occurs early, with >80% of recurrences occurring within the first 2 yr. Debate remains as to whether robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) negatively impacts early recurrence patterns because of inadequate resection or pneumoperitoneum. We report early recurrence patterns among 717 patients who underwent RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion at nine different institutions with a minimum follow-up of 12 mo. Clinical, pathologic, radiologic, and survival data at the latest follow-up were collected. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression models were built to assess variables associated with recurrence. RFS at 3, 12, and 24 mo was 95.9%, 80.2%, and 74.6% respectively. Distant recurrences most frequently occurred in the bones, lungs, and liver, and pelvic lymph nodes were the commonest site of local recurrence. We identified five patients (0.7%) with peritoneal carcinomatosis and two patients (0.3%) with metastasis at the port site (wound site). We conclude that unusual recurrence patterns were not identified in this multi-institutional series and that recurrence patterns appear similar to those in open radical cystectomy series. PATIENT SUMMARY In this multi-institutional study, bladder cancer recurrences following robotic surgery are described. Early recurrence rates and locations appear to be similar to those for open radical cystectomy series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rami Issa
- St. Georges Hospital London, London, UK
| | | | - Carl Wijburg
- Carl Wijburg, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Simone G, Papalia R, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Minisola F, Ferriero M, Vallati G, Guaglianone S, Gallucci M. Robotic Intracorporeal Padua Ileal Bladder: Surgical Technique, Perioperative, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2016; 73:934-940. [PMID: 27780643 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction is a challenging procedure. The need for surgical skills and the long operative times have led to concern about its reproducibility. OBJECTIVE To illustrate our technique for RARC and totally intracorporeal orthotopic Padua ileal bladder. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From August 2012 to February 2014, 45 patients underwent this technique at a single tertiary referral centre. SURGICAL PROCEDURE RARC, extended pelvic lymph node dissection, and intracorporeal partly stapled neobladder. Surgical steps are demonstrated in the accompanying video. MEASUREMENTS Demographics, clinical, and pathological data were collected. Perioperative, 2-yr oncologic and 2-yr functional outcomes were reported. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Intraoperative transfusion or conversion to open surgery was not necessary in any case and intracorporeal neobladder was successfully performed in all 45 patients. Median operative time was 305min (interquartile range [IQR]: 282-345). Median estimated blood loss was 210ml (IQR: 50-250). Median hospital stay was 9 d (IQR: 7-12). The overall incidence of perioperative, 30-d and 180-d complications were 44.4%, 57.8%, and 77.8%, respectively, while severe complications occurred in17.8%, 17.8%, and 35.5%, respectively. Two-yr daytime and night-time continence rates were 73.3% and 55.5%, respectively. Two-yr disease free survival, cancer specific survival, and overall survival rates were 72.5%, 82.3%, and 82.4%, respectively. The small sample size and high caseload of the centre might affect the reproducibility of these results. CONCLUSIONS Our experience supports the feasibility of totally intracorporeal neobladder following RARC. Operative times and perioperative complication rates are likely to be reduced with increasing experience. PATIENT SUMMARY We report the outcomes of our first 45 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladders. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes support this technique as a feasible and safe surgical option in tertiary referral centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Minisola
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giulio Vallati
- Department of Radiology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sargos P, Baumann BC, Eapen LJ, Bahl A, Murthy V, Roubaud G, Orré M, Efstathiou JA, Shariat S, Larré S, Richaud P, Christodouleas JP. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer: time to reconsider? Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5:702-710. [PMID: 27785427 PMCID: PMC5071208 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.08.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection, associated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, remains the standard of care for advanced, non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Loco-regional control is a key factor in the outcome of patients since it is related to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cause-specific survival. The risk of loco-regional recurrence (LRR) is correlated to pathological factors as well as the extent of the lymphadenectomy. In addition, neither pre- nor post-operative chemotherapy have shown a clear impact on LRR-free survival. Several recent publications have led to the development of a nomogram predicting the risk of LRR, in order to identify patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Given the high risk of LRR for selected patients and improvements in radiation techniques that can reduce toxicity, there is a growing interest in adjuvant radiotherapy; international cooperative groups have come together to provide the rationale in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinical trials in order to reduce the risk of pelvic relapse are opened based on this optimizing patient selection. The aim of this critical literature review is to provide an overview of the rationale supporting the studies of adjuvant radiation for patients with pathologic high-risk MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Libni J Eapen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit Bahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathieu Orré
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephane Larré
- Department of Urology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Pierre Richaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - John P Christodouleas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
The importance of clinical stage among patients with a complete pathologic response at radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J Urol 2016; 34:1561-1566. [PMID: 26943643 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1801-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients without evidence of disease at radical cystectomy (RC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have the greatest potential for survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Historically, 15 % of such patients will experience disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. We sought to evaluate the effect of pre-treatment clinical factors on the risk of recurrence in patients who were ypT0N0 at RC. METHODS We performed a multi-institutional review of patients treated with NAC + RC for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (≥cT2) without pathologic evidence of disease at surgery (ypT0N0). The association of pre-treatment clinicopathologic features with recurrence was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS A total of 78 patients were identified with ypT0 disease at RC after NAC. Median postoperative follow-up was 32.4 months (IQR 16.8, 60.0), during which time 17 patients recurred at a median of 6.4 months after RC. Estimated 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of this cohort was 74.8 %. In univariate analysis, cT4 disease (HR 3.12; p = 0.04) and time to RC (HR 1.17 for each month increase; p < 0.01) were associated with inferior RFS. CONCLUSION Patients without evidence of disease at the time of RC are still at risk of recurrence and death from bladder cancer. Higher clinical stage and increased time to RC were associated with an increased risk of recurrence and subsequent death. These data highlight the importance of timely RC and the continued risk of recurrence in higher clinically staged patients-underscoring the need for close monitoring and patient counseling.
Collapse
|
49
|
Chang SS. Re: Conditional Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Evidence for a Patient Changing Risk Profile over Time. J Urol 2016; 195:610-1. [PMID: 26887704 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
50
|
BAKRY RANIA, EL-SAYED MOHAMEDI, HAMZA HESHAMM, HASSAN KHALEDH. Pretreatment levels of serum osteoprotegerin and p53 protein and urine telomerase as prognostic factors affecting survival in Egyptian bladder cancer patients. Oncol Lett 2016; 11:823-830. [PMID: 26870291 PMCID: PMC4727083 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A non-invasive marker is required for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the potential prognostic significance of serum osteoprotegerin (OPG), p53 protein and urine telomerase in patients with bladder cancer. For all patients, serum levels of OPG and p53 protein were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and urine telomerase was assessed using a polymerase chain reaction ELISA technique. Patients were assigned into group 1 (cystectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy) or group 2 (transurethral resection and chemoradiotherapy). The results revealed that serum OPG and p53, and urine telomerase levels were significantly higher in bladder cancer patients compared with in healthy individuals (P<0.0001). High serum OPG was associated with significantly lower overall survival and disease-free survival rates (both P=0.001), and was correlated with advanced tumor stages (P<0.0001), high tumor grades (P<0.0001) and the occurrence of disease relapse (P=0.001). Serum p53 and urine telomerase did not demonstrate prognostic significance. These findings indicate that serum OPG level may be used as a diagnostic tool and a prognostic variable for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Future trials are required to elucidate its therapeutic role in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RANIA BAKRY
- Department of Clinical Pathology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut 71111, Egypt
| | - MOHAMED I. EL-SAYED
- Department of Radiotherapy, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut 71111, Egypt
| | - HESHAM M. HAMZA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut 71111, Egypt
| | - KHALED H. HASSAN
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|