Pediatric Robotic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation: Comparison With Open Surgery

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation in Pre-Toilet Trained Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of pre-toilet trained children undergoing RALUR for the treatment of primary VUR at our institution and compare these to an older cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from a single institution's registry, comparing outcomes between pre-toilet trained and toilet trained children who underwent RALUR for primary VUR. Preoperative parameters, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 158 patients, with 24 in the pre-toilet trained group and 134 in the toilet trained group. Both cohorts exhibited similar demographics and preoperative characteristics. Operative times, complication rates, and surgical outcomes were comparable between the groups, despite the pre-toilet trained group presenting with more severe VUR grades. Incidence of febrile UTI after surgery and need for further intervention did not significantly differ between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrates the feasibility, success, and safety of RALUR in pre-toilet trained compared to toilet-trained children and thus support the stance that it is a viable alternative to open surgery.

Endoscopic injection vs anti-reflux surgery for moderate- and high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children: a cost-effectiveness international study

Even if vesicoureteral reflux is a common condition in children, there are no guidelines about the best therapeutic approach. This study aims to compare the results of endoscopic injection and ureteral reimplantation in children with grade III, IV and V VUR. A multicenter retrospective study included children with grade III, IV and V VUR treated from 2003 to 2018 at three Departments of Pediatric Surgery. Patients were divided into Group A (endoscopic injections) and Group B (anti-reflux surgery), B1 (open, OUR), B2 (laparoscopic, LUR) and B3 (robot-assisted laparoscopic RALUR). Follow-up was at least 5 years. 400 patients were included, 232 (58%) in group A and 168 (42%) in group B. Mean age at surgery was 38.6 months [3.1-218.7]. Mean follow-up was 177.8 months [60-240]. Group A had shorter operative time than group B (P < 0.01); lower analgesic requirement (p < 0.05), shorter hospital stay (P < 0.05) and lower overall costs (p < 0.05), but higher postoperative PNPs (p < 0.01), lower success rate (p < 0.01) and higher redo-surgery percentage (p < 0.01). No differences in terms of postoperative complications, success rate and mean radiation exposure between the two groups. Endoscopy is associated with shorter operative time, shorter hospitalization and lower cost, also in case of multiple injections. Recurrence rate after surgery is lower meaning lower rate of re-hospitalization and radiation exposure for children.

Robot-Assisted Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation (REVUR) in Pediatric Patients: A New Standard of Treatment for Patients with VUR-A Narrative Review

Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (REVUR) was described for the first time in 2004. Since then, the surgical approach of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has changed dramatically. The benefits of this technique are great when compared to the laparoscopic or traditional open approaches. A literature search of PubMed was performed to identify articles covering any aspect of REVUR in the pediatric population. A total of 108 papers published over the period 2004-2024 were collected. Of these, 40 studies were considered valuable in terms of obtaining a complete overview of the REVUR technique. This review aimed to describe the current state of the art of REVUR and define it as the new standard technique for surgical management of selected patients with VUR.

Advancements in Surgical Management of Megaureters

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review and describe the recent evolution of surgery for the various types of pediatric megaureter.

RECENT FINDINGS

Megaureter management first relies on determining the underlying cause, whether by obstruction, reflux, or a combination, and then setting appropriate surgical indications because many cases do not require surgery as shown by observation studies. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been on the rise as a major treatment option for obstructive megaureter, while refluxing megaureters can also be treated by laparoscopic and robotic techniques, whether extravesically or transvesicoscopically. During ureteral reimplantation, tapering is sometimes necessary to address the enlarged ureter, but there are also considerations for not tapering or for tapering alternatives. Endoscopic and minimally invasive surgeries for megaureter have been the predominant focus of recent megaureter literature. These techniques still need collaborative prospective studies to better define which surgeries are best for patients needing megaureter interventions.

Minimally Invasive versus Open Ureteral Reimplantation in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

 We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) in children.

METHODS

 Literature searches were conducted to identify studies that compared MIS (laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation or robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation) and OUR in children. Parameters such as operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, success rate, postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), urinary retention, postoperative hematuria, wound infection, and overall postoperative complications were pooled and compared by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

 Among the 7,882 pediatric participants in the 14 studies, 852 received MIS, and 7,030 received OUR. When compared with the OUR, the MIS approach resulted in shorter hospital stays (I 2 = 99%, weighted mean difference [WMD] -2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.22 to -1.41; p < 0.001), less blood loss (I 2 = 100%, WMD -12.65, 95% CI -24.82 to -0.48; p = 0.04), and less wound infection (I 2 = 0%, odds ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.78; p = 0.02). However, no significant difference was found in operative time and secondary outcomes such as postoperative UTI, urinary retention, postoperative hematuria, and overall postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

 MIS is a safe, feasible, and effective surgical procedure in children when compared with OUR. Compared with OUR, MIS has a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less wound infection. Furthermore, MIS is equivalent to OUR in terms of success rate and secondary outcomes such as postoperative UTI, urinary retention, postoperative hematuria, and overall postoperative complications. We conclude that MIS should be considered an acceptable option for pediatric ureteral reimplantation.

Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted endoscopic treatment of primary intermediate and high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children in a long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is an important minimally invasive surgical approach in patients undergoing surgical treatment of VUR. In our past experience, we observed that a bulking agent mound sagittal diameter of 10 mm is the main predictor of effectiveness of the procedure. Moreover we noticed that the use of intraoperative ultrasound, allows the surgeon to better identify the site, volume and shape of the bulking agent injected, finally reducing operative time.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate if the intraoperative ultrasound assistance could definitively improve effectiveness of the endoscopic procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared two series treated with endoscopic procedures for intermediate and high grade primary VUR, respectively without (series A) and with (series B) intraoperative ultrasound (IO-US). In all patients VCUG was performed to assess VUR grade and to verify resolution or VUR downgrading during the follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 177 ureteric units were treated. Endoscopic procedures globally were effective in 68/96 ureters (70.8 %) in series A and in 68/81 ureters (83.9 %) in series B. No significant differences in effectiveness were observed comparing the series with regard to VUR grades, but a significant difference is shown (p < 0.05) when grouping grades III-V VUR. No significance in differences of volume injected were detected, but operative time was significantly lower in series B (27.5 min vs 19.6 min, p < 0.05). Mean sagittal mound diameter measured during cystoscopy in series B was 10.45 mm (range 8.5-14.2 mm).

DISCUSSION

The intraoperative ultrasound assistance during endoscopic treatment of VUR could represent a valid tool for surgeons to better identify location, volume and shape of the bulking agent. Furthermore, the use of an objective parameter of evaluation of the implant can overcome the subjective intraoperative evaluation of the implant itself, improving results for experienced surgeons and reducing the learning-curve for inexperienced ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of endoscopic injection of bulking-agent can be improved with intraoperative ultrasound, allowing at the same time a significant reduction of operative time.

The LUAA Gundeti Technique for Bilateral Robotic Ureteral Reimplantation: Lessons Learned over a Decade for Optimal (Resolution, Urinary Retention, and Perioperative Complications) Trifecta Outcomes

Background

Ureteral reimplantation is the gold standard treatment for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in pediatric patients. Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (RALUR-EV) using the LUAA technique has emerged as a viable alternative to traditional open and laparoscopic surgical correction.

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes, reflux resolution, urinary retention, and complications associated with bilateral RALUR-EV for primary VUR using the LUAA Gundeti technique in pediatric patients.

Design setting and participants

A retrospective study was conducted at a single academic center, involving 34 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent RALUR-EV for bilateral VUR management between December 2008 and December 2022. The study included only patients who were evaluated with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG).

Surgical procedure

The LUAA extravesical ureteral reimplantation technique was performed, involving the identification and mobilization of the ureter, creation of a peritoneal window, dissection close to the neurovascular bundle, Y dissection at the ureterovesical junction, detrusorotomy, detrusorrhaphy with advential inclusion, and apical alignment suture.

Measurements

The primary outcome was radiographic resolution of VUR on VCUG. The secondary outcomes included urinary retention and Clavien-Dindo grade III complications.

Results and limitations

The overall radiographic resolution rate was 85.2%, with success rates of 76.7%, 75%, and 96.7% across the three distinct patient cohorts. The overall Clavien-Dindo grade III complication rate was 5.8%, and transient urinary retention was 8.8%. Resolution of urinary retention occurred within 7-28 d. The study's limitations include the small sample size, single-center design, and retrospective nature.

Conclusions

The LUAA technique demonstrates sustainable outcomes for VUR resolution with a low incidence of transient urinary retention and complications. A thorough understanding of pelvic anatomy is essential for successful dissection and minimization of the risk of complications. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches in reducing the incidence of transient urinary retention following bilateral extravesical reimplantation.

Patient summary

In this study, we examined the results of the Gundeti LUAA surgical technique for treating primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. We identified various essential modifications that increase the likelihood of achieving favorable outcomes.

Robotic approach to the uretero-vesical junction in children: An international multicentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted approach to UVJ is getting more and more used in pediatric patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective study 26 patients affected by nephro-urological malformations, robotic-surgically treated from 2016 and 2021 at 3 Pediatric Surgery Department were included: 3 (11.5%) primary obstructive megaureter, 2 (7.7%) dysplastic kidneys, 3 (11.5%) duplex collecting system, 18 (69.2%) primary vescico-ureteral reflux (VUR).

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 6 years old. 22 (84.6%) underwent Lich Gregoire extravesical ureteral reimplantation, 4 (15.4%) total nephroureterectomy. Mean operative time was 230 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications. Median hospital stay was 4 days. There were 4 (15.38%) postoperative complications: 3 (11.54%) persistent VUR and 1 (3.84%) refluxing megaureter. 2 (7.7%) redo-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic Surgery should be considered a safe and effective technique for treatment of UVJ anomalies in children, because it firstly allows surgeons to approach both upper and lower ureteral ends without modifying trocars' placement.

Paediatric robotic surgery: a narrative review

The benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with traditional open surgery, including reduced postoperative pain and a reduced length of stay, are well recognised. A significant barrier for MIS in paediatric populations has been the technical challenge posed by laparoscopic surgery in small working spaces, where rigid instruments and restrictive working angles act as barriers to safe dissection. Thus, open surgery remains commonplace in paediatrics, particularly for complex major surgery and for surgical oncology. Robotic surgical platforms have been designed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery by offering a stable 3-dimensional view, improved ergonomics and greater range of motion. Such advantages may be particularly beneficial in paediatric surgery by empowering the surgeon to perform MIS in the smaller working spaces found in children, particularly in cases that may demand intracorporeal suturing and anastomosis. However, some reservations have been raised regarding the utilisation of robotic platforms in children, including elevated cost, an increased operative time and a lack of dedicated paediatric equipment. This article aims to review the current role of robotics within the field of paediatric surgery.

Pediatric robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (revur) in simple and complex ureter anatomy: Report of a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (REVUR) is a well established approach for surgical treatment of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). However, further evidence is needed to confirm its efficacy even in case of complex anatomy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to further confirm the evidence that REVUR is safe and effective in both simple and complex ureter anatomy.

STUDY DESIGN

The charts of all patients with VUR, who received REVUR in 6 different institutions over a 5-year period, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with both simple and complex ureter anatomy were included. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and post-operative results were assessed. VUR resolution was defined as either being resolved VUR on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) or clinically without symptoms during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with median age of 6.9 years (range 4.5-12), receiving REVUR in the study period, were included. Eighteen (31.6%) patients had complex anatomy and included prior failed endoscopic injection (n = 13), complete ureteral duplication (n = 2), periureteral diverticulum (n = 2), ectopic megaureter requiring dismembering (n = 1). The median operative time was 155 min for unilateral and 211.5 min for bilateral repairs. The clinical + radiographic VUR resolution rate was 96.5%. Post-operative complications (Clavien 2) included urinary retention following bilateral repair (n = 5, 8.7%), febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) (n = 6, 10.5%) and gross hematuria (n = 3, 5.2%). Comparative analysis between simple and complex cases showed that REVUR was faster in simple cases in both unilateral [p = 0.002] and bilateral repair [p = 0.001] and post-operative urinary retention was more frequent in simple cases [p = 0.004] and in patients with pre-operative bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) [p = 0.001] (Table).

DISCUSSION

This series confirmed that the robot-assisted technique was feasible even in cases with complex anatomy using some technical refinements, that justified the longer operative times in both unilateral and bilateral cases. An interesting finding of this study was the correlation emerged between BBD and risk of post-operative urinary retention and VUR persistence. Our results also excluded any significant correlation between complex cases and risk of post-operative urinary retention. The main study limitations included the retrospective and nonrandomized design, the small number of cases and the arbitrary definition of complex anatomy.

CONCLUSION

REVUR was safe and effective for management of VUR in both simple and complex ureter anatomy. Complex REVUR required slightly longer operative times, without significant differences in post-operative mordidity and success rates. Aside from complex anatomy, BBD emerged as the main risk factor associated with surgical failure and post-operative morbidity.

Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review

To establish the feasibility of robotic surgical procedures in urology in terms of the applications, merits, and demerits as well as the postoperative and oncological outcomes while comparing it with the conventional approaches. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort studies on Robot-Assisted urological surgical procedures in comparison with the conventional methods. The quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the revised Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool. A qualitative narrative synthesis of the data extracted from the studies was performed and presented in tabulated form. After screening, 39 studies were included in our review (7 Randomized Controlled Trials and 32 Cohort studies). Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy appears to be associated with lower estimated blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay. For Robot-Assisted Cystectomy, the results suggest longer operative time and fewer complications. Robot-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy was found to be associated with fewer perioperative complications and longer mean operative time while Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy was associated with less positive surgical margins and reduced need for postoperative analgesia. The mean operative time was longer while the length of stay was shorter for the robotic approach in inguinal lymphadenectomy and ureteral reimplantation. The feasibility of Robot-Assisted surgery varied for different outcome measures as well as for different procedures. Some common advantages were a shorter length of stay, lesser blood loss, and fewer complications while the drawbacks included longer operative time.Study protocol PROSPERO database (Registration Number: CRD42021256623).

Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic, laparoscopic and open surgery in ureteral reimplantation: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

To compare the efficacy and safety between open ureteral replantation (OUR), laparoscopic ureteral replantation (LUR) and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation (RALUR). This review produced by the R3.5.0 software with "gemtc" program package and JAGS3.4.0 software based on the Bayesian model. A comprehensive search was done in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, Cnki, CBM and WANFANG DATA. Studies that compared OUR, LUR OR RALUR were selected. Summary of Conclusions by ranking of Outcomes. A total of 3949 patients from 29 studies were included. The success rate in OUR, LUR and RALUR was 97.72%, 94.68% and 95.82%. The OR (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR was 0.76 (0.42,1.7) and 0.76 (0.30, 2.6), respectively, compared with OUR. The rate of complications in OUR, LUR and RALUR was 12.78%, 7.94% and 16.32%. The OR (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR was 0.28 (0.16, 0.48) and 0.61 (0.24,1.3), respectively, compared with OUR. The MD (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR for operation time was 22 (2,40) and 46 (7.5,84), respectively, compared with OUR. The MD (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR for hospital stay was - 3.6 (- 4.5, - 2.7) and - 1.1 (- 2.9, 0.58), respectively, compared with OUR. There is no significant difference in the success rates of OUR, LUR, and RALUR. RALUR and OUR has similar complication rates and time of hospital stay, while LUR has fewer complications and faster time to discharge compared to RALUR and OUR. The operative time of OUR is significantly less compared to LUR and RALUR.

Incidence and resolution of de novo hydronephrosis after pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux

INTRODUCTION

With the advent of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), understanding and minimizing its complications continues to be critical. Incidence of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR could be indicative of an outcome that needs further study or could be a benign transient finding.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we hypothesized that the incidence of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR is low and resolves spontaneously.

METHODS

An IRB-approved prospective single-institutional registry was utilized to identify all patients undergoing RALUR via an extravesical approach from 2012 to 2020. Patients with primary VUR and minimal (Grade I SFU) or no hydronephrosis prior to surgery were included. Patients who had other associated pathology or underwent concomitant procedures were excluded. Preoperative characteristics including VUR and hydronephrosis grades as well as post-operative clinical details and hydronephrosis grades were aggregated and analyzed.

RESULTS

86/172 (50%) patients (133 ureters), with median reflux grade of 3 (IQR: G2, G3) met the inclusion criteria. Patients underwent RALUR at a median age of 5.7 years (IQR: 3.4, 8.7) with median 36.2 months (IQR: 19.6, 63.6) follow-up. Renal ultrasound at 4-6 weeks post-op showed de novo hydronephrosis in 18 (13.5%) ureters; the complete resolution was seen in 13 ureters (72%) at a median of 4.5 months from surgery. Among the 5 with non-resolved hydronephrosis (SFU G2:4, G3:1), 2 patients (3 ureters) underwent subsequent interventions.

DISCUSSION

The present study evaluating the natural history of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR-EV performed for primary VUR, is to our knowledge the largest cohort of patients undergoing RALUR that this has been studied in. In our cohort, the incidence of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR was 13.5%, similar to rates reported in two OUR cohorts, and significantly lower than reported incidence rates of 22-26% in several OUR cohorts, and 30% in a RALUR cohort. In the present cohort, hydronephrosis resolved spontaneously in more than 72% of cases. The median time from surgery until resolution of hydronephrosis was 4.5 (1.6, 10.5) months, which is shorter in comparison to the average time to resolution of 7.6 months, reported by Kim et al. in an earlier study.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo hydronephrosis after RALUR can be followed with serial renal ultrasounds. The majority of de novo hydronephrosis post-RALUR is transient and resolves spontaneously within a year of surgery with a very low re-intervention rate.

The Role of the Versius Surgical Robotic System in the Paediatric Population

The uptake of robot-assisted surgery has continuously grown since its advent in the 1990s. While robot-assisted surgery is well-established in adult surgery, the rate of uptake in paediatric surgical centres has been slower. The advantages of a robot-assisted system, such as improved visibility, dexterity, and ergonomics, could make it a superior choice over the traditional laparoscopic approach. However, its implementation in the paediatric surgery arena has been limited primarily due to the unavailability of appropriately sized instruments as per paediatric body habitus, therefore, requiring more technologically advanced systems. The Versius surgical robotic system is a new modular platform that offers several benefits such as articulated instruments which pass through conventional 5 mm ports, compact arms for easier manoeuvrability and patient access, the ability to mimic conventional port placements, and adaptive machine learning concepts. Prior to its introduction to paediatric surgery, it needs to go through a careful pre-clinical and clinical research program.

Contemporary Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Children

Purpose of Review

Urinary tract infection (UTI) in children is a major source of office visits and healthcare expenditure. Research into the diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis of UTI has evolved over the past 10 years. The development of new imaging techniques and UTI screening tools has improved our diagnostic accuracy tremendously. Identifying who to treat is imperative as the increase in multi-drug-resistant organisms has emphasized the need for antibiotic stewardship. This review covers the contemporary management of children with UTI and the data-driven paradigm shifts that have been implemented into clinical practice.

Recent Findings

With recent data illustrating the self-limiting nature and low prevalence of clinically significant vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), investigational imaging in children has become increasingly less frequent. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram (CEVUS) has emerged as a useful diagnostic tool, as it can provide accurate detection of VUR without the need of radiation. The urinary and intestinal microbiomes are being investigated as potential therapeutic drug targets, as children with recurrent UTIs have significant alterations in bacterial proliferation. Use of adjunctive corticosteroids in children with pyelonephritis may decrease the risk of renal scarring and progressive renal insufficiency. The development of a vaccine against an antigen present on Escherichia coli may change the way we treat children with recurrent UTIs.

Summary

The American Academy of Pediatrics defines a UTI as the presence of at least 50,000 CFU/mL of a single uropathogen obtained by bladder catheterization with a dipstick urinalysis positive for leukocyte esterase (LE) or WBC present on urine microscopy. UTIs are more common in females, with uncircumcised males having the highest risk in the first year of life. E. coli is the most frequently cultured organism in UTI diagnoses and multi-drug-resistant strains are becoming more common. Diagnosis should be confirmed with an uncontaminated urine specimen, obtained from mid-stream collection, bladder catheterization, or suprapubic aspiration. Patients meeting criteria for imaging should undergo a renal and bladder ultrasound, with further investigational imaging based on results of ultrasound or clinical history. Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial; however, evidence shows patients with high-grade VUR and bladder and bowel dysfunction retain the most benefit. Open surgical repair of reflux is the gold standard for patients who fail medical management with endoscopic approaches available for select populations.

Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Assessment of Clinical Failure after Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation: A Multi-Center Study

We aimed to develop and validate a scoring system as an objective assessment tool for predicting clinical failure after pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation. Data for this multi-institutional retrospective cohort was obtained from two tertiary referral hospitals. We defined clinical failure as incomplete radiographic resolution or post-operative febrile UTI. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups according to the score. External validation was performed using the model projected to the external validation cohort. An amount of 115 renal units in the development cohort and 46 renal units in the validation cohort were analyzed. The prediction score was calculated with weighted points to each variable according to their regression coefficient as age (year) + BMI + BBD times 10 + VUR grade times 7 + console time (h) + hospital stay times 6. The C-index of our scoring system was 0.850 and 0.770 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Clinical failure was significantly different among risk groups: 0% (low-risk), 3.3% (intermediate-risk), and 22.2% (high-risk) (p = 0.004) in the development cohort. A novel scoring system using multiple pre- and intra-operative variables provides a prediction of children at risk of failure after robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation.

Extravesical vs. intravesical ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the outcomes of extravesical (EVUR) and intravesical (IVUR) ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) via systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Literature review from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane since inception to March 2022 was performed. Meta-analysis was conducted on eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational cohort studies (OCS) comparing outcomes between EVUR and IVUR.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, comprising 577 patients (778 ureters) operated by EVUR and 395 patients (635 ureters) by IVUR. Pre-operative VUR grade, postoperative VUR persistence and hydronephrosis was not statistically significant. EVUR had shorter operative time [mean differences (MD) -22.91 min; 95% confidence interval (CI), -44.53 to -1.30, P = 0.04] and hospital stay (MD -2.09 days; 95% CI, -2.82 to -1.36, P < 0.00001) compared to IVUR. Bilateral EVUR had higher risk of postoperative acute urinary retention (ARU) (8.1%) compared to bilateral IVUR (1.7%) (OR = 4.40; 95% CI, 1.33-14.58, P = 0.02). No patient undergoing unilateral EVUR or IVUR experienced ARU.

CONCLUSION

Both EVUR and IVUR are equally effective in correcting primary VUR. Operative time and hospital stay are shorter after EVUR compared to IVUR. However, bilateral EVUR is associated with higher risk of postoperative ARU.

Outcomes of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation after failed ipsilateral endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic injection (EI) has been considered a minimally invasive option with high success rates. However, in clinical settings where EI has failed, and after repeat injections or worsening clinical presentation, different treatment modalities may be offered. Open ureteral reimplantation has emerged as a safe option in patients who have failed EI for VUR treatment. Currently there is limited literature describing success of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) following primary EI for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

OBJECTIVE

We aim to describe our surgical technique and outcomes using RALUR approach following failed EI for VUR. We hypothesize RALUR can be a safe, salvage option in patients who have failed EI for VUR in the setting of recurrent VUR or ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO).

METHODS

A single site, retrospective study using electronic medical records of all patients who underwent RALUR between 2013 and 2019 following history of previous ipsilateral EI using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA) for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was conducted. Primary outcomes were radiographic resolution and/or clinical resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 17 RALUR procedures were reviewed in 16 patients. There were 14 females (87.5%) and 2 males (12.5%). Seven patients had two prior EI. Median (range) age at time of RALUR was 10.1 (5.7-17.9) years, and the average time between EI and RALUR was 5.9 years [1-13]. The average VUR recurrence grade after failed EI was 3 (ranges 2-4) on preoperative VCUG. History of bilateral EI using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA), was observed in 14 patients. Surgical diagnosis at time of RALUR included persistent VUR (N = 10) or symptomatic ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO, N = 6). Mean console times were 102 min (range 70-240 min) for RALUR vs 128 min (range 70-180 min) for cases requiring ureteral tailoring. Six complications occurred in 16 patients (37.6%): Using the Clavien-Dindo classification scale, four patients (25%) were grade I, one (6.3%) grade II, and one (6.3%) was grade IIIb, which required additional procedures for ureteral obstruction.

CONCLUSION

RALUR after failed EI should be considered a reasonably safe and effective surgical approach in older children with persistent VUR or acquired UVJO.

Robot‑Assisted Laparoscopic Extra-Vesical Ureteral Reimplantation (Ralur/Revur) for Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Systematic Review of Literature

This literature review aimed to assess the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (RALUR/REVUR) in standard, complex and re-operative cases. Twenty-two studies (period 2008-2019) containing 1362 children receiving RALUR/REVUR, were included. Unilateral repair was faster compared to bilateral (P = .0000). The overall patient success rate was 92%. The mean post-operative complications rate was 10.7%. The mean re-operations rate was 3.9%. The available data show that RALUR/REVUR can be a first line surgical approach for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux at most centers with the caveat that learning curves for the surgeons are expected as with most new surgical procedures.

Parental preferences for vesicoureteral reflux treatment: Profile case best-worst scaling

INTRODUCTION

Vesicoureteral reflux is a common pediatric urologic condition that often has several reasonable treatment options depending on condition severity. In order to choose the best treatment for their child, parents are expected to make judgements that weigh attributes such as treatment cost, effectiveness, and complication rate. Prior research has shown that factors such as treating hospital and surgeon also influence patient treatment choice.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates parental preferences for reflux treatment using profile case best-worst scaling, an emerging technique in both urologic and health care preference estimation. The study also uses latent class analysis (LCA) to identify parental sub-classes with different preferences.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were collected from a community sample of parents via a multimedia best-worst scaling survey instrument published to Amazon's Mechanical Turk online community. After extensive review of the literature, reflux attributes and attribute levels were selected to correspond with available treatments. The profile case best-worst scaling exercise elicited preferences for granular attributes of reflux treatments. Data were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression and class analysis to distinguish preference heterogeneity. Probability scaled values (PSVs) reflected the order of desirability of the attributes. Attribute preference importance was rescaled into dollar units for comparison as well.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 248 respondents. The highest treatment effectiveness was more desirable than all other leveled treatment attributes (PSV 17.8, all p < 0.01) (Table). Low complication rate and doctor recommendation were amongst the other most desirable treatment attributes (PSV 11.3 and 9.0, respectively). Latent class analysis identified a class with more extreme preferences, for whom doctor recommendation and avoiding hospitalization were particularly desirable.

DISCUSSION

In this community-based sample, high treatment effectiveness and low complication rate were the most desirable treatment attributes to parents, though parents likely have heterogenous treatment preference structures. Shared parent-physician decision-making that incorporates parental preferences will likely allow more effective, targeted decision-making in the future.

Preoperative Bladder Bowel Dysfunction Is the Most Important Predictive Factor for Postoperative Urinary Retention After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation via An Extravesical Approach: A Multi-Center Study

Introduction: Postoperative acute urinary retention (pAUR) is a known occurrence after robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation via an extravesical approach (RALUR-EV). We hypothesized that the risk factor of pAUR after RALUR-EV might be similar to that of pAUR after open reimplantation. We aimed at performing a retrospective multi-institutional study to evaluate the risk factors for pAUR after RALUR-EV. Materials and Methods: Perioperative data collected from two tertiary referral hospitals included demographics and perioperative variables such as bladder bowel dysfunction (BBD) status, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) grade, and laterality. pAUR was defined as the need for urethral catheter replacement after removal of the initial postoperative catheter. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for pAUR. Results: A total of 117 patients with 174 renal units from the 2 hospitals were enrolled in this study. The median age at the time of surgery was 5 (0.3-19) years. Bilateral RALUR-EV was performed in 57 (48.7%) cases. pAUR rate was 3.4% in all patients and 7.0% in 57 patients with bilateral VUR. All four cases of pAUR occurred after bilateral surgery. Univariate analysis showed age (p = 0.037), weight (p = 0.039), height (p = 0.040), and bilaterality (p = 0.037) as risk factors of pAUR. In a multivariate analysis, BBD was the only significant risk factor of pAUR (p = 0.037). Conclusion: Urinary retention after RALUR-EV occurred less frequently when compared with the previously reported open surgery series. pAUR was seen only in bilateral cases in our series. Preoperative history of BBD, but not male gender or length of surgical time, was the only risk factor of pAUR after RALUR-EV.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplant: A single-center experience

Introduction:

Open ureteral reimplant has been the gold standard for management of lower ureteric strictures. With the widespread acceptance of robotic surgery, robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplant (RALUR) is becoming the preferred choice for performing ureteral reimplant. We present our single-institution and single-surgeon experience of performing RALUR.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent RALUR at our institute in the last 5 years. Demographic data were recorded along with presenting complaint and diagnosis. Intraoperative variables included operative and docking time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, technique, and procedure performed. Postoperative data that were analyzed included complications, hospital stay, and outcomes. Patient satisfaction score was calculated using a numerical scale of points 1–6.

Results:

The mean age of patients was 31.5 ± 9.8 years (r = 4–45). Male: female ratio was 3:5. The most common presenting symptom was flank pain, and the most common etiology was iatrogenic strictures in adults and congenital vesicoureteral reflux in children. The mean operative time and blood loss were 135.3 ± 45.1 min (r = 84–221) and 67.7 ± 31.4 ml (r = 32–118), respectively. There were no intraoperative complications and nil conversion to open surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 ± 2.3 days (r = 3–9). Radiographic success was achieved in 41 out of 44 ureters. Eighty-five percent of the patients were completely satisfied with robotic approach and its outcomes.

Conclusion:

RALUR is a minimally invasive, safe, feasible, less morbid technique with good outcome.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Universal Cystoscopy at the Time of Benign Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To estimate the rate of lower urinary tract injury (LUTI) and percentage of LUTI needing to be recognized intraoperatively to make universal cystoscopy cost-effective and cost-saving during laparoscopic hysterectomy.

DESIGN

A decision tree model was used to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with delayed or intraoperative recognition of LUTI at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Probabilities and utilities were estimated from published literature. Costs were estimated from Medicare national reimbursement schedules. Threshold analyses estimated the LUTI rate and cystoscopy sensitivity that would make universal cystoscopy cost-effective or cost-saving. Monte Carlo simulations were performed.

SETTING

US healthcare system.

PATIENTS

Individuals undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications.

INTERVENTIONS

Theoretic implementation of a universal cystoscopy policy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The total direct medical costs of laparoscopic hysterectomy under usual care were $8831 to $9149 and under universal cystoscopy were $8944 to $9068. When low LUTI rates (0.44%; estimated using sample-weighted estimates of retrospective and prospective data) were assumed, universal cystoscopy was only cost-effective in 17.1% of the simulations; the incremental cost was estimated to be $111 to $131. With median LUTI rates (2.3%) or high LUTI rates (4.0%; estimated using only prospective data with universal screening), the universal cystoscopy strategy was cost-effective in 93.9% and 99.6% of the simulations, respectively, and potentially cost-saving if the sensitivity of intraoperative cystoscopy for ureteral injury exceeded 65% or 31%, respectively. The estimated potential savings were $18 to $95 per hysterectomy. In threshold analysis assuming the average cystoscopy sensitivity rate, universal cystoscopy is estimated to be cost-effective when the LUTI rate exceeds 0.80%.

CONCLUSION

In our model, universal cystoscopy is the preferred approach for laparoscopic hysterectomy and is estimated to be cost-effective in contemporary clinical settings where the LUTI rate is estimated to be 1.8% and potentially cost-saving among higher-risk populations, including those with endometriosis or pelvic organ prolapse. If the LUTI rates are less than 0.75%, the estimated incremental costs are modest-up to $131 per case. Administrators and providers should consider the local LUTI rates and practice patterns when planning implementation of a universal cystoscopy policy.

Robotics in Pediatric Urology: Evolution and the Future

Almost 30 years have passed since the inception of minimally invasive surgery in urology and specifically in pediatric urology. Laparoscopy has now become an essential tool in the pediatric urologic armamentarium. The application of robot-assisted surgery in pediatrics has allowed for widespread utilization for common reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation. Understanding the implementation, technical considerations, and outcomes are critical for continued success and adoption. This has allowed for increased use in more complex urologic procedures such as redo pyeloplasty, dismembered ureteral reimplantation, catheterizable channel creation, and bladder augmentation.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical versus conventional laparoscopic extravesical ureteric reimplantation for pediatric primary vesicoureteric reflux: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteric reimplantation (RALUR) with conventional laparoscopic extravesical ureteric reimplantation (LEVUR) for primary vesicoureteric reflux in children. We searched the databases to identify all papers of RALUR and LEVUR between 2001 and 2020. Systematic review was performed to identify patient data, age, reflux grades, laterality, duration of surgery, time to discharge, success rate and complications. Heterogeneity was reported with I² statistics and publication bias was assessed by Doi curve and Luis Furuya-Kanamori index. Pooled data from both groups were compared with Student's t test and Fisher's exact test, wherever appropriate. From a total of 43 articles screened, 28 articles were included (18 RALUR and 10 LEVUR). The I² statistics for RALUR and LEVUR showed heterogeneity of 86% and 25%, respectively. Both groups had comparable minor publication bias. RALUR had higher proportion of grade 5 VUR (p < 0.001) and bilateral reimplantations (p < 0.001). The success rate of RALUR was significantly lower than that of LEVUR (97.6% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.0018). RALUR took a significantly longer duration for surgery compared to LEVUR, both for unilateral and bilateral cases (p < 0.001). The complication rate was not significantly different: 6.6% for RALUR and 5.35% for LEVUR (p = 0.32). The most common complication in both groups was post-operative urinary retention in bilateral cases. Articles on LEVUR reported more consistent success. RALUR series had higher proportion of grade 5 cases and bilateral reimplantations. RALUR reported longer operative time and lower success compared to LEVUR, with a complication rate comparable to LEVUR.

Parental perception of bladder spasms and hematuria after surgery for vesicoureteral reflux: A prospective multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Anti-reflux surgery success has been well-documented in the literature. Little data exists about the characterization of the child's symptoms regarding pain, bladder spasms, and hematuria following these procedures. These symptoms may affect the choice of surgery for families and providers.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize parent's perception of recovery from surgery and preparedness for recovery from surgery. We hypothesized that parents of children undergoing open intravesical reimplantation (Open) would report a higher incidence of bladder spasms and hematuria compared to children undergoing robotic extravesical reimplantation (RALR) or endoscopic treatment (DxHA).

STUDY DESIGN

A 20-question survey was developed to assess perception of recovery preparedness, pain, and symptoms. Parents completed the survey at a follow-up visit occurring 3-6 weeks post-discharge. Chi-square and t-test or their non-parametric equivalents were used for between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

Participating were three institutions and eleven surgeons. Eighty-four parents completed the survey a median of 33 days (IQR 27-40) post-surgery. More parents reported bladder spasms and hematuria in the Open group vs RALR and DxHA. Although there was no difference in maximum bladder spasm pain, duration of pain medication for spasms was longer with Open vs RALR. Most parents (87%) reported they were prepared for their child's symptoms after surgery. Approximately one-quarter of parents whose child underwent Open (33%) or RALR (36%) reported the bladder spasms were more painful than expected, and almost half of parents whose child underwent Open (49%) reported hematuria was worse than expected.

DISCUSSION

We found that Open had significantly worse parental reports of bladder spasms, pain medication usage, and severity of hematuria than RALR and DxHA. Although most parents said they were prepared for their child's recovery, many reported the symptoms were worse than expected. These contradictions may reflect a need for improved physician to parent communication when discussing anti-reflux surgery.

Robotic Ureteral Reimplantation

Minimally invasive techniques have gained popularity in pediatric surgery. Among these, is the robotic approach for ureteral reimplantation in children with vesico-ureteral reflux. We describe main indications of this surgery, our surgical technique as well as trouble shooting of anatomical variants and the post-operative management. We also provide a description of other techniques described in the literature and a brief review of outcomes of published series.

Does de novo hydronephrosis after pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral re-implantation behave similarly to open re-implantation?

BACKGROUND

While open ureteral re-implantation surgery is the gold standard for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral re-implantation via an extravesical approach (RALUR-EV) has become a minimally invasive alternative. Previous studies have shown that transient hydronephrosis after open re-implantation can occur in up to 28% of patients. However, previous studies have also shown that de novo hydronephrosis after open re-implantation is not predictive of final differential renal function.

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective review was performed to characterize the natural history of postoperative hydronephrosis after RALUR-EV for primary VUR in pediatric patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon series was performed for pediatric patients who underwent RALUR-EV for primary VUR. The severity of de novo hydronephrosis was assessed using the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grading system via renal ultrasound at the 1-month postoperative follow-up. Renal ultrasound was performed at least every six months. Radiographic success was defined as complete resolution of VUR on the voiding cystourethrogram at the 4-month mark. Patient demographics, surgery duration, length of hospital stay, pre-operative and postoperative VUR grades, and follow-up time periods were collected. Patients with other associated urinary pathology and patients lost to follow-up were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients (121 kidney units) with primary VUR who underwent RALUR-EV met the inclusion criteria. SFU grade 1-3 hydronephrosis was noted in 30.3% (36/119) of kidney units at the 1-month mark, but 83.9% (26/31) cases with hydronephrosis completely resolved in a median time of 7.9 months (range: 3.4-21.0 months), and all four cases with unresolved hydronephrosis were downgraded to SFU grade 1 without the need for intervention.

DISCUSSION

A radiographic success rate of 96% was demonstrated in this cohort, which is comparable with that of historical open re-implantation series. A similar rate of de novo hydronephrosis was also noted in this cohort when compared with that of previous open re-implantation series, but de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR-EV had a similar or more rapid resolution rate than that previously reported after open intravesical and extravesical re-implantation series.

CONCLUSION

De novo hydronephrosis after RALUR-EV behaves similarly to de novo hydronephrosis after open ureteral re-implantation, where de novo hydronephrosis is present in up to 30% of pediatric patients who underwent RALUR-EV. The hydronephrosis self-resolves without the need for intervention in the overwhelming majority of cases and resolves at a median time of 7.9 months after surgery.

Lessons learned from a single-surgeon series of paediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic urological procedures: predictors of high-grade postoperative complications

OBJECTIVES

To describe postoperative complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic urological surgery in children, and identify potential predictors of these complications by analysing the outcomes of a large-volume single-surgeon experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed our institutional database to identify all robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) cases performed between December 2007 and December 2017. Patients were grouped into three cohorts based on the anatomical location of the procedure: upper urinary tract (kidney and renal pelvis); lower urinary tract (ureter); and lower urinary tract reconstruction with bowel (bladder reconstruction). A descriptive analysis of baseline characteristics, intra-operative variables and postoperative outcomes was carried out. All complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale, and grouped based on type and time of occurrence (<30, 30-90, >90 days). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of high-grade complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III). We also measured complication rates based on year of surgery and surgical caseload.

RESULTS

Our database included a total of 326 patients, of whom 57% (n = 186) underwent upper urinary tract procedures, 30% (n = 97) ureteric procedures, and 13% bladder reconstruction. The median follow-up for each procedure was 13, 11 and 57 months, respectively. Of the total, 10 cases were converted to an open approach and excluded from further analysis. The most common types of complication in all groups were infections (urinary tract infections) and urinary complications (urine leaks and urolithiasis). Bladder reconstructive procedures, which require the use of bowel, presented the highest rate of high-grade complications (32%). Length of hospital stay (LOS; odds ratio [OR] 1.33, confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.53), estimated blood loss (EBL) in surgery (OR 1.01, CI 1.002-1.019) and operating time (OR 1.004, CI 1.002-1.006) were all associated with increased odds of high-grade complications on multivariate analysis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-surgeon series, we have described the most commonly encountered complications after RAL in paediatric urology, finding rates similar to the complication rates reported in the current literature on other surgical approaches. In addition, LOS, operating time and EBL, which are probable surrogates of case complexity, were associated with increased odds of high-grade complications.

Parental Preferences for Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatment: A Crowd-sourced, Best-worst Scaling Study

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively evaluate parental preferences for the various treatments for vesicoureteral reflux using crowd-sourced best-worst scaling, a novel technique in urologic preference estimation.

METHODS

Preference data were collected from a community sample of parents via 2 best-worst scaling survey instruments published to Amazon's Mechanical Turk online community. Attributes and attribute levels were selected following extensive review of the reflux literature. Respondents completed an object case best-worst scaling exercise to prioritize general aspects of reflux treatments and multiprofile case best-worst scaling to elicit their preferences for the specific differences in reflux treatments. Data were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Results from the object-case provided probability scaled values (PSV) that reflected the order of importance of attributes.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 248 and 228 respondents for object and multiprofile case BWS, respectively. When prioritizing general aspects of reflux treatment, effectiveness (PSV = 20.37), risk of future urinary tract infection (PSV = 14.85), and complication rate (PSV = 14.55) were most important to parents. Societal cost (PSV = 1.41), length of hospitalization (PSV = 1.09), and cosmesis (PSV = 0.91) were least important. Parents perceived no difference in preference for the cosmetic outcome of open vs minimally invasive surgery (P = .791). Bundling attribute preference weights, parents in our study would choose open surgery 74.9% of the time.

CONCLUSION

High treatment effectiveness was the most important and preferred attribute to parents. Alternatively, cost and cosmesis were among the least important. Our findings serve to inform shared parent-physician decision-making for vesicoureteral reflux.

Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications

Over the last 30 years, robotic surgery has evolved into the preferred surgical approach for many operative cases. Robotics has been associated with lower pain scales, shorter hospitalizations, and improved cosmesis (1, 2). However, its acceptance in pediatrics have been hampered by longer operative times, smaller working space, and limited fine surgical instruments. Many find these challenges even more pronounced when performing robotic surgery in infants (i.e., children <1 year old). Although the data in infants is less robust, many studies have shown benefits similar to the adult population. Specifically, multiple reports of robotic surgery in infants have shown lower postoperative analgesic use. Additionally, hospital stays are shorter, which may lead to quicker return to work for parents and guardians. Multiple reports have shown low complication rates of robotic surgery in infants. When complications have occurred, they are usually Clavien Grade 1 and 2, with occasional grade 3. Often the complications are not from the robotic technique, but are linked to other factors such as the ureteral stents (3, 4). Most importantly, the success rates of surgery are comparable to open surgery. This chapter will review indications for the most common urologic robotic surgeries performed in infants. Also, we will review reported results and complications of robotic surgery in children, with specific attention to the infant population. However, data focused only on infants is limited. Many studies have some infant patients, but their results are often mixed with all pediatric patients.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: a valuable alternative to open surgery

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical systems have led to new minimally invasive options for complex reconstructive procedures in children including for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation has been shown to be a viable minimally invasive surgical option for children with VUR. However, higher-than-expected complication rates and sub-optimal reflux resolution rates at some centers have also been reported.

METHODS

This article provides a focused literature review as well as current perspectives on open reimplantation and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation as non-endoscopic surgical options for pediatric VUR.

RESULTS

The heterogeneity of surgical outcomes may, in part, be due to the learning curve inherent with all new technology and procedures. As a result, the current gold standard surgical option for VUR continues to be open ureteral reimplantation. While it remains to be seen if robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery will gradually replace open surgery as the most utilized surgical option for VUR in pediatric patients, robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with the current robotic surgical systems may be just one step toward an eventual minimally invasive option that all experienced surgeons can offer with the requisite high success rates and low major complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation remains a viable minimally invasive surgical option for children with VUR, but with the expected learning curve associated with all new technologies.

Managing vesicoureteral reflux in children: making sense of all the data

Current management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children is the result of a steady albeit controversial evolution of data and thinking related to the clinical impact of VUR and urinary tract infection (UTI) in children, the value of clinical screening, and the relative impact of testing and interventions for VUR. While controversy continues, there is consensus on the importance of bladder dysfunction on VUR outcomes, the likelihood of VUR resolution, and the fact that not all children with VUR require active treatment. Early efforts to define risk stratification hold the most promise to provide more patient-specific treatment of UTI and VUR in children.

The Robot-Assisted Extravesical Anti-reflux Surgery: How We Overcame the Learning Curve

Management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has evolved over the past several decades, with a trend toward a decrease in surgical management. In spite of this, ureteral reimplantation remains a commonly performed procedure by pediatric urologists in selected cases. Although the basic tenets of the ureteral reimplant procedure remain the same, the extra- vs. intravesical approach, and the traditional open vs. minimally invasive approach remain the primary options to correct reflux. Considering the advantages conferred by the robotic surgery platform, many leading centers have preferentially adopted robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical anti-reflux surgery, or in common surgical parlance, the robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR), over pure laparoscopic or open approaches. Predicated on our experience of performing over 170 cases of RALUR, we have made technical modifications which we posit reduce the morbidity of the procedure while offering acceptable outcomes. This review highlights the evolution and establishment of RALUR as a standardization of care in the surgical management of VUR at our institution. In particular, we emphasize the technical nuances and specific challenges encountered through the learning curve in hopes of facilitating this process for others.

Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population

Robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) surgery is a safe, minimally invasive technique that has become more widely used in pediatric urology over recent decades. With several advantages over standard laparoscopy, robotic surgery is particularly well-suited to reconstructive surgery involving delicate structures like the ureter. A robotic approach provides excellent access to and visualization of the ureter at all levels. Common applications include upper ureteral reconstruction (e.g., pyeloplasty, ureteropelvic junction polypectomy, ureterocalicostomy, and high uretero-ureterostomy in duplex systems), mid-ureteral reconstruction (e.g., mid uretero-ureterostomy for stricture or polyp), and lower ureteral reconstruction (e.g., ureteral reimplantation and lower ureter-ureterostomy in duplex systems). Herein, we describe each of these robotic procedures in detail.

A contemporary single-institution retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative outcomes between robotic and open partial nephrectomy for poorly functioning renal moieties in children with duplex collecting systems

INTRODUCTION

Studies evaluating robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) are limited to case series, amounting to a lack of studies directly comparing perioperative outcomes for RALPN to open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes between RALPN and OPN.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed to compare perioperative outcomes (operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), complications, readmissions, postoperative interventions, loss in size of the residual moiety, and the presence of postoperative 'contained fluid collections') for RALPN and OPN between February 2007 and July 2014. Descriptive statistics were calculated and unadjusted analyses performed, including Chi-squared/Fisher's exact for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables.

RESULTS

During the study period, 43 partial nephrectomies were performed for benign disease: 27 (63%) RALPN and 16 (37%) OPN. The RALPN cohort was significantly older than the OPN cohort (3.5 vs. 0.8 years; P = 0.003). The cohorts were otherwise similar regarding race, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), affected moiety, laterality, associated anomalies, moiety function, and surgical indication. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with a significantly shorter LOS (1 vs. 3 days; P = 0.002). Operative time and complication rates were comparable. The OPN group had a longer median follow-up (2.7 years vs. 1.1; P = 0.03). No differences were observed between the cohorts for readmissions, postoperative interventions, loss in size of residual moiety, or development of 'contained fluid collections'. These outcomes are reported in the Summary Table. 'Contained fluid collections' occurred more frequently after lower pole resections (73% vs. 30%; P = 0.009).

DISCUSSION

This study is one of the few to directly compare RALPN to OPN, and demonstrated that RALPN has comparable (if not better) outcomes than OPN. In particular, RALPN provides the advantage of a shorter LOS. Avoiding the flank incision used in OPN may also offer reduced pain; however, this was not studied here and the literature provides weak evidence for this effect. This unadjusted analysis may have been confounded by its short median follow-up and significantly younger OPN cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this contemporary comparative analysis, RALPN predicted a similar median OT and safety profile to OPN while offering the advantage of a shorter LOS. Regardless of surgical cohort, there were no adverse effects on the residual renal moieties and postoperative 'contained fluid collections' occurred with notable frequency and were independently associated with lower pole pathology.

Robotic surgery in pediatric urology: Current status

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has been increasingly embraced in the fields of adult and pediatric urology, especially in North America and Europe. The advantages of a stable magnified 3-D view, tremor filtering, and motion scaling allow for precise intracorporeal exposure and suturing. Because most surgeries are performed as reconstructive rather than excision procedures, the robotic platform is particularly feasible for the field of pediatric urology. In this review, we summarize the recent viewpoints on RALS, such as pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation, bladder neck reconstruction, bladder neck sling, appendicovesicostomy, bladder diverticulectomy, and treatments for ureterocele or ectopic ureters, and we also critically summarize the current status of the literature. Based on our initial experience, RALS is technically feasible for pediatric patients and may be achieved with comparable surgical outcomes. RALS is also associated with reduced morbidity compared to open surgery to conventional laparoscopic surgery. This evolution will offer an alternative in the treatment pediatric patients, along with improved care and patient quality of life. Further large case series and randomized controlled trials that investigate the robotic platform's technological improvements will help to expand indications of RALS in the field of pediatric urology.

Paediatric robotic surgery

A review of the current status of robotic surgery use in paediatrics.

Prospective multicenter study on robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (RALUR-EV): Outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (RALUR-EV) is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. We have previously reported retrospective outcomes from our study group, and herein provide an updated prospective analysis with a focus on success rate, surgical technique, and complications among surgeons who have overcome the initial learning curve.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of RALUR-EV in children, among experienced surgeons.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed our prospective database of children undergoing RALUR-EV by pediatric urologists at eight academic centers from 2015 to 2017. Radiographic success was defined as absence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien scale. Univariate regression analysis was performed to assess for association among various patient and technical factors and radiographic failure.

RESULTS

In total, 143 patients were treated with RALUR-EV for primary VUR (87 unilateral, 56 bilateral; 199 ureters). The majority of ureters (73.4%) had grade III or higher VUR preoperatively. Radiographic resolution was present in 93.8% of ureters, as shown in the summary table. Ureteral complications occurred in five ureters (2.5%) with mean follow-up of 7.4 months (SD 4.0). Transient urinary retention occurred in four patients following bilateral procedure (7.1%) and in no patients after unilateral. On univariate analysis, there were no patient or technical factors associated with increased odds of radiographic failure.

DISCUSSION

We report a radiographic success rate of 93.8% overall, and 94.1% among children with grades III-V VUR. In contemporary series, alternate management options such as endoscopic injection and open UR have reported radiographic success rates of 90% and 93.5% respectively. We were unable to identify specific patient or technical factors that influenced outcomes, although immeasurable factors such as tissue handling and intraoperative decision-making could not be assessed. Ureteral complications requiring operative intervention were rare and occurred with the same incidence reported in a large open series. Limitations include lack of long-term follow-up and absence of radiographic follow-up on a subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic resolution of VUR following RALUR is on par with contemporary open series, and the incidence of ureteral complications is low. RALUR should be considered as one of several viable options for management of VUR in children.

Current status of robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although open ureteral reimplantation remains the gold standard for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) holds promise and is becoming more widely utilized. The present article outlines primary operative techniques for RALUR, summarizes the current literature with respect to surgical outcomes and costs, and discusses early applications of RALUR to complex and reoperative cases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intravesical and extravesical techniques for RALUR have been described. Published outcomes vary with respect to operational definitions of surgical success and reporting of complications. Several studies have directly compared RALUR and open reimplant, suggesting equivalent efficacy and safety. Recent noncomparative studies have reported lower VUR resolution rates and higher complication rates for RALUR, particularly in bilateral cases. The application of RALUR to reoperative surgery and cases requiring tapering and dismemberment is under very early investigation. RALUR is consistently associated with lower postoperative analgesic requirements and decreased hospital stay, but longer operative times and higher costs compared to open reimplant.

SUMMARY

Published outcomes after RALUR show mixed results that, on average, may be inferior to open reimplant. Future investigations should seek to identify patient-related and intraoperative factors associated with successful and unsuccessful outcomes.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open ureteral reimplantation for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) and open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) in treating primary pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) based on published literature.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and VIP databases was conducted to identify studies comparing the outcomes of RALUR with OUR for treating primary pediatric VUR. The last search was in January 2017. Summarized mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the differences in outcomes between RALUR and OUR.

RESULTS

A total of six studies containing 7122 children with primary VUR were included in this analysis. Significantly longer operation time was needed for RALUR than OUR (MD 66.69 min, 95% CI 41.71-91.67, P < 0.00001), while the RALUR group had significantly fewer days of hospital stay (MD - 17.80 h, 95% CI - 21.18 to - 14.42, P < 0.00001) and postoperative Foley placement (MD - 0.32 days, 95% CI - 0.57 to - 0.07, P = 0.01). No significant differences were found in estimated blood loss during operation, success rate, complications, and postoperative analgesia usage between the two groups. In subgroup analyses, a significantly higher rate of short-term postoperative complications in RALUR was found compared with OUR (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.72-5.85, P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that compared with OUR, RALUR is also an effective surgical approach for primary pediatric VUR and could help patients return to society more quickly; however, short-term postoperative complications of RALUR should be considered cautiously.

Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction - current status and future directions

Robotic surgery in the treatment in certain urological diseases has become a mainstay. With the increasing use of the robotic platform, some surgeries which were historically performed open have transitioned to a minimally invasive technique. Recently, the robotic approach has become more utilized for ureteral reconstruction. In this article, the authors review the surgical techniques for a number of major ureteral reconstuctive surgeries and briefly discuss the outcomes reported in the literature.

Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (revur) for unilateral vesico-ureteral reflux in children: results of a multicentric international survey

PURPOSE

This multicentric international retrospective study aimed to report the outcome of robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (REVUR) in patients with unilateral vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR).

METHODS

The medical records of 55 patients (35 girls, 20 boys) underwent REVUR in four international centers of pediatric robotic surgery for primary unilateral VUR were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' average age was 4.9 years. The preoperative grade of reflux was III in 12.7%, IV in 47.3% and V in 40%. Twenty-six patients (47.3%) presented a loss of renal function preoperatively and 10 (18.1%) had a duplex system.

RESULTS

Average robot docking time was 16.2 min (range 5-30). Average total operative time was 92.2 min (range 50-170). No conversions or intra-operative complications were recorded. All patients had a bladder Foley catheter for 24 h post-operatively. Average hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-3). Average follow-up length was 28 months (range 9-60). We recorded three (5.4%) postoperative complications: 1 small urinoma resolved spontaneously (II Clavien) and 2 persistent reflux, only one requiring redo-surgery using endoscopic injection (IIIb Clavien).

CONCLUSION

REVUR is a safe and effective technique for treatment of primary unilateral VUR. The procedure is easy and fast to perform thanks to the 6° of freedom of robotic arms. The learning curve is short and it is useful to begin the robotics experience with a surgeon expert in robotic surgery as proctor on the 2nd robot console. The high cost and the diameter of instruments remain the main challenges of robotics applications in pediatric urology.

Is robot-assisted laparoscopic bilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation associated with greater morbidity than unilateral surgery? A comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION

Voiding dysfunction after bilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux has long remained a concern. Robotic approach with improved visualization that enables focused and minimal dissection may help with this concern.

OBJECTIVES

To compare postoperative outcomes after bilateral robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation to unilateral robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study using data abstracted from an institutional review board-approved registry prospectively maintained at our institution since 2012. Patient demographics, preoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Patients with postoperative febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) underwent voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Surgical success is defined as absence of febrile UTI or febrile UTI with negative VCUG.

RESULTS

92 patients with a median follow-up of 14 (25th and 75th IQR 5, 28) months. Median operative time (150 vs. 178 min, p = 0.01) and median hospital stay (33 vs. 37 h, p = 0.01) were longer in the bilateral cohort. Weight-adjusted morphine equivalents requirement was also higher in the bilateral group (0.45 vs. 0.59, p = 0.019).

DISCUSSION

Early postoperative voiding dysfunction is influenced by anesthesia, postoperative pain, analgesics, age, surgical dissection, and preoperative voiding issues. Effective preoperative management of voiding dysfunction, minimizing surgical dissection and cautery, and minimizing opiate use will aid improving outcomes after surgery and enable bilateral surgeries on uretero-vesical junction. A robotic approach to facilitate such strategies could help outcomes after bilateral ureteral reimplantation. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design, the absence of routine postoperative VCUG after ureteral reimplantation, and unknown confounding variables.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic bilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity compared with unilateral surgery.

Our experiences with robot- assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients: the first case series from Turkey

OBJECTIVE

Robotic surgery is a leading treatment option for minimally invasive surgery and has an increasing popularity in pediatric population, as well. In this article, we reported our case series of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 29 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent robot- assisted procedures between May 2014 and October 2016. Patient demographics, hospitalization time, estimated blood loss, robotic time and total operative and peri-, and post-operative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 24 ureter units (18 patients) with grade 1-5 vesicoureteral reflux in 13 female and 5 male, 1 male patient with vesicoureteral stenosis were underwent robot- assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR). All patients had complete resolution after surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) was performed in 6 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. All patients had complete resolution after surgery. Completely intracorporeal robotic assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty (RLAIC) was applied to two patients with neurogenic bladder. The symptoms and preoperative hydronephrosis were regressed on the first month of follow-up. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reduction cystoplasty (RALRC) was performed in 14-year-old boy with a bladder diverticula and recurrent urinary tract infection. The last case was eleven- year-old female patient with non-functioning kidney. She had recurrent urinary tract infections and was treated with robotic assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (RALN).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is safe and efficient in pediatric population. Although open surgery is still the gold standard for many pediatric diseases, inherent reconstructive advantages of robotic assisted laparoscopy have a chance to change this view.