1
|
Lasmanovich R, Shvero A, Kleinmann N. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: conservative management - intraluminal adjuvant therapy, and surveillance. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00204. [PMID: 39483069 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, intraluminal therapies have become a valid alternative for low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients, as overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were shown to be comparable to those achieved with radical nephroureterectomy for selected cases. Nonetheless, endoscopic treatment has its limitations. As technology progresses and the demand for endoscopic treatments increases, intraluminal chemotherapy and immunotherapy instillations within the upper tract have increasingly become the subject areas of research. RECENT FINDINGS The main intraluminal therapies and relevant instillation approaches are reviewed in this study, including recent publications and their main outcomes. The recurrence rates demonstrated in the literature strengthen the notion that patients with UTUC following current intraluminal treatments have a better prognosis than in the past. Updated relevant guidelines regarding surveillance among this population are also reviewed and summarized. SUMMARY The treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is clinically challenging. Developments in recent years show promising results in this field and ongoing research with new developments is emerging. Further studies are required to better understand the contribution of intraluminal therapies to the management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinat Lasmanovich
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Asaf Shvero
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nir Kleinmann
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei W, Fan P, Zhang Z, Wu D, Liu J, Wang L, Duan X, Zhang X, Ding D. A urine-based liquid biopsy for detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a self-matched study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:1180. [PMID: 39333973 PMCID: PMC11438001 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12913-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To establish the pathological diagnosis of UTUC before treatment is profitable. At present, the conventional pathological diagnostic methods have certain problems. Besides, the urine-based DNA methylation test have been already utilized to detect bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test and compare the combined test with cytology. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 45 patients from April 2019 to May 2022, all of whom underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), nephrectomy, diagnostic ureteroscopy or tissue biopsy. Before surgery, the urine samples were collected for DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test and cytology. The test performance was calculated, and comparative ROC curves were drawn. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 67 years. The Kappa value of the DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test and tissue pathology was 0.59 (p<0.001). The sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test was 86/80/94/62% compared with 29/100/100/29% for cytology. The AUC of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test was 0.829 (p<0.001).The mutated gene proportion of UTUC patients was 51.43% for TERT and 25.71% for TP53. CONCLUSION The test performance of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test was satisfactory, which may replace cytology in the future. Further multicenter studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the clinical value of this promising method. NOVELTY & IMPACT STATEMENTS We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of a urine-based liquid biopsy for the detection of UTUC and compared the combined test with cytology. We found satisfactory results and concluded that the test could partly replace cytology. Further studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wei
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Panhong Fan
- Department of Pathology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhishu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Danting Wu
- Department of Pathology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Junfeng Liu
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lingdian Wang
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Duan
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoli Zhang
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Degang Ding
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosenbaum CM, Netsch C, Filmar S, Hook S, Gross AJ, Becker B. [Organ-preserving treatment for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024:10.1007/s00120-024-02422-3. [PMID: 39269527 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02422-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare but the incidence is currently increasing in western countries. Radical nephroureterectomy has long been the standard treatment; however, it can lead to chronic kidney failure and also the necessity for dialysis. Therefore, organ-preserving treatment is now recommended for selected patients with low-risk tumors. The choice of treatment depends on the tumor characteristics, comorbidities and individual risk factors. Surgical options for organ preservation include ureterorenoscopy (URS), percutaneous treatment and partial ureteral resection. The URS is the most frequently used method for organ preservation. Photodynamic diagnostics (PDD) and narrow band imaging (NBI) can potentially also be used for tumor detection in the upper urinary tract. Conservative options such as topical treatment with mitomycin C or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and systemic treatment options are also possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens M Rosenbaum
- Klinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland.
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
| | - Christopher Netsch
- Klinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Simon Filmar
- Klinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Sophia Hook
- Klinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas J Gross
- Klinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Benedikt Becker
- Klinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuil HW, Figaroa OJ, Hendriks N, Schout BM, Beerlage HP, van Jamaludin FS, M.E.L. Henderickx M, van Moorselaar RJA, Kamphuis GM, Baard J. Navigating the Aftermath: A Comprehensive Scoping Review on Follow-up Strategies After Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 66:82-92. [PMID: 39050911 PMCID: PMC11268123 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) can be managed efficiently and safely through kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) in selected patient groups. However, the most effective and efficient postoperative surveillance strategy remains undetermined. We aimed to provide a comprehensive synopsis of the follow-up strategies and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with UTUC treated by KSS. Methods Following the systematic methodology outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted searches in four databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up until December 11, 2023. Key findings and limitations A total of 3121 articles underwent screening, of which 19 were selected for inclusion in this review. The follow-up schedules after KSS exhibited considerable variability among the included studies. Diagnostic modalities employed consisted of computed tomography urography (present in 84% of protocols), X urography (21%), ultrasound (21%), thoracic imaging (26%), voided urine cytology (89%), selective upper tract cytology (5.3%), cystoscopy (84%), and ureterorenoscopy (53%) at varying frequencies. At 5 yr of follow-up, the reported recurrence-free survival rate ranged from 30% to 86%, overall survival was 50-92%, and metastasis-free survival was 77-90%. Conclusions and clinical implications This review unveils significant heterogeneity in clinical practices and survival outcomes, indicating disparities between real-world approaches and guideline recommendations. The lack of consensus on follow-up schemes is evident, emphasising the necessity for future initiatives aimed at developing a comprehensive protocol. Patient summary This review shows significant heterogeneity in follow-up strategies after kidney-sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A lack of evidence contributes to discrepancies between guidelines and real-world approaches. Thus, future endeavours should aim at establishing a comprehensive protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo W. Schuil
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Orlane J.A. Figaroa
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nora Hendriks
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harrie P. Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michaël M.E.L. Henderickx
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guido M. Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mizukami T, Kawamura H, Kubo N, Sato H, Kawahara M, Adachi A, Matsui H, Suzuki K, Saitoh JI, Nakano T, Ohno T. Carbon-ion radiotherapy for inoperable upper tract ureteral cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024; 20:365-371. [PMID: 37088970 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to report initial results of hypofractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for inoperable upper tract ureteral cancer. METHODS Retrospective chart review was performed for five consecutive patients with medically inoperable ureter cancer that was treated with radical C-ion RT between December 2013 and December 2014. The median age of the patients was 80 years (range, 68-84 years). The reasons for inoperability were advanced age, post-contralateral nephrectomy, alcoholic cirrhosis, both advanced age and contralateral renal function degeneracy, and pneumonia. The median size of tumor was 2.8 cm (range, 2.2-4.0 cm). Diagnostic imaging did not identify lymph node metastases or distant metastases in any case. All patients underwent C-ion RT (52.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness; 12 fractions in 3 weeks). The clinical target volume encompassed the growth tumor volume with a 5-mm margin bilaterally; there was a 40-mm margin craniocaudally but the clinical target volume did not encompass the whole ureter. RESULTS Within a median follow-up time of 32.9 months (range, 24-36 months), two patients died and three remained alive. Neither local recurrence nor regional lymph node metastases were observed. Secondary bladder tumor was observed in four patients, and one patient had a liver metastasis. Grade 1 hematuria was observed in two patients, and Grade 3 pyelonephritis was observed in one patient as acute toxicity. Ureteral obstruction was observed in two patients. CONCLUSION C-ion RT might be a useful treatment option for inoperable ureter cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuji Mizukami
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hidemasa Kawamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan
| | - Nobuteru Kubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiro Sato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kawahara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akiko Adachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsui
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Suzuki
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Jun-Ichi Saitoh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Takashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
- Quantum Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giulioni C, Brocca C, Tramanzoli P, Stramucci S, Mantovan M, Perpepaj L, Cicconofri A, Gauhar V, Merseburger AS, Galosi AB, Castellani D. Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol 2024; 42:318. [PMID: 38743260 PMCID: PMC11093876 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05032-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Localized Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon cancer typically detected at an advanced stage. Currently, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for high-risk UTUC. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival and bladder recurrence rates in studies comparing endoscopic kidney-sparing surgeries (E-KSS) with RNU in localized UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a literature search on 20th April 2023 through PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The PICOS model was used for study inclusion: P: adult patients with localized UTUC; I: E-KSS. C: RNU; O: primary: overall survival (OS); secondary: cancer-specific survival (CSS), bladder recurrence rate, and metastasis-free survival (MFS). S: retrospective, prospective, and randomized studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 11 studies involving 2284 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, 737 in the E-KSS group and 1547 in the RNU group. E-KSS showed a similar overall 5-year OS between E-KSS and RNU, and for low-grade tumors, while 5-year OS favored RNU for high-grade tumors (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.26-2.69, p = 0.002). No difference emerged for 5-year CSS between the two groups, even when the results were stratified for low- and high grade tumors. Bladder recurrence rate and 5-year MFS were also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our review showed that E-KSS is a viable option for patients with localized UTUC with non-inferior oncological outcomes as compared with RNU, except for 5-year OS in high-grade tumors which favoured RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Giulioni
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Carlo Brocca
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Tramanzoli
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Stramucci
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Matteo Mantovan
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Leonard Perpepaj
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Cicconofri
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Axel Stuart Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee CU, Lee JH, Lee HW, Chung JH, Song W, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Sung HH. Analysis of progression after elective distal ureterectomy and effects of salvage radical nephroureterectomy in patients with distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3497. [PMID: 38347103 PMCID: PMC10861547 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54232-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
We compared the progression patterns after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and elective distal ureterectomy (DU) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the distal ureter. Between Jan 2011 and Dec 2020, 127 patients who underwent RNU and 46 who underwent elective DU for distal ureteral cancer were enrolled in this study. The patterns of progression and upper tract recurrence were compared between the two groups. Progression was defined as a local recurrence and/or distant metastasis after surgery. Upper tract recurrence and subsequent treatment in patients with DU were analyzed. Progression occurred in 35 (27.6%) and 10 (21.7%) patients in the RNU and DU groups, respectively. The progression pattern was not significantly different (p = 0.441), and the most common progression site was the lymph nodes in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pT2 stage, concomitant lymphovascular invasion, and nodal stage were significant predictors of disease progression. Upper tract recurrence was observed in nine (19.6%) patients with DU, and six (66.7%) patients had a prior history of bladder tumor. All patients with upper tract recurrence after DU were managed with salvage RNU. Elective DU with or without salvage treatment was not a risk factor for disease progression (p = 0.736), overall survival (p = 0.457), cancer-specific survival (p = 0.169), or intravesical recurrence-free survival (p = 0.921). In terms of progression patterns and oncological outcomes, there was no difference between patients who underwent RNU and elective DU with/without salvage treatment. Elective DU should be considered as a therapeutic option for distal ureter tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Hye Won Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klemm J, Bekku K, Abufaraj M, Laukhtina E, Matsukawa A, Parizi MK, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Current Surveillance Strategies for Non-Metastatic Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:44. [PMID: 38201472 PMCID: PMC10777993 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Non-metastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) is a comparatively rare condition, typically managed with either kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Irrespective of the chosen therapeutic modality, patients with UTUC remain at risk of recurrence in the bladder; in patients treated with KSS, the risk of recurrence is high in the remnant ipsilateral upper tract system but there is a low but existent risk in the contralateral system as well as in the chest and in the abdomen/pelvis. For patients treated with RNU for high-risk UTUC, the risk of recurrence in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, as well as the contralateral UT, depends on the tumor stage, grade, and nodal status. Hence, implementing a risk-stratified, location-specific follow-up is indicated to ensure timely detection of cancer recurrence. However, there are no data on the type and frequency/schedule of follow-up or on the impact of the recurrence type and site on outcomes; indeed, it is not well known whether imaging-detected asymptomatic recurrences confer a better outcome than recurrences detected due to symptoms/signs. Novel imaging techniques and more precise risk stratification methods based on time-dependent probabilistic events hold significant promise for making a cost-efficient individualized, patient-centered, outcomes-oriented follow-up strategy possible. We show and discuss the follow-up protocols of the major urologic societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8525, Japan
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada;
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Qiu J, Deng R, Yu C, Gong K. The long-term outcome of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study of 1969 patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:14869-14878. [PMID: 37598342 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the long-term outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and investigate prognostic factors for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as the role of NSS for UTUC remains unclear. METHODS Patients diagnosed with organ-localized UTUC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The propensity score overlap weighting (PSOW) process, Cox regression analysis, Kaplan‒Meier analysis, competing-risks models, and subgroup analysis were employed to compare the outcomes and identify prognostic factors. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) nomograms were developed and evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. RESULTS A total of 1969 patients were included. After the process of PSOW, baseline data were well balanced. RNU was associated with similar OS and CSS than NSS in the overall cohort. Age, T stage, and histologic grade were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, while marital status was an independent prognostic factor only for OS. Four and three predictors were identified for developing the OS and CSS nomograms, respectively. C-index (OS 0.637, CSS 0.670), calibration curve, and Kaplan-Meier analysis proved excellent predictive accuracy of nomograms. CONCLUSION Patients accepting RNU had a comparative or better outcome in each sample group. NSS achieved a similar oncologic control for selected patients with organ-localized UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhui Qiu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Ruiyi Deng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chaojian Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Kan Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ghoreifi A, Sari Motlagh R, Fuchs G. Modern Kidney-Sparing Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4495. [PMID: 37760465 PMCID: PMC10526335 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the latest evidence on the modern techniques and outcomes of kidney-sparing surgeries (KSS) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS A comprehensive literature search on the study topic was conducted before 30 April 2023 using electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. A narrative overview of the literature was then provided based on the extracted data and a qualitative synthesis of the findings. RESULTS KSS is recommended for low- as well as select high-risk UTUCs who are not eligible for radical treatments. Endoscopic ablation is a KSS option that is associated with similar oncological outcomes compared with radical treatments while preserving renal function in well-selected patients. The other option in this setting is distal ureterectomy, which has the advantage of providing a definitive pathological stage and grade. Data from retrospective studies support the superiority of this approach over radical treatment with similar oncological outcomes, albeit in select cases. Novel chemoablation agents have also been studied in the past few years, of which mitomycin gel has received FDA approval for use in low-risk UTUCs. CONCLUSION KSSs are acceptable approaches for patients with low- and select high-risk UTUCs, which preserve renal function without compromising the oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Ghoreifi
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA;
| | | | - Gerhard Fuchs
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wei W, Liu J, Wang L, Duan X, Ding D. Segmental ureterectomy for high-risk ureteral carcinoma: a preliminary report. BMC Urol 2023; 23:103. [PMID: 37277741 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01265-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND EAU guidelines strongly recommend kidney sparing surgery (KSS) as the primary treatment option for the low-risk UTUC patients. While there are few reports involving the KSS treated for the high-risk counterparts, especially the ureteral resection. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the segmental ureterectomy (SU) for the patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 20 patients from May 2017 to December 2021 who underwent segmental ureterectomy (SU) in Henan Provincial People's Hospital. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Besides, the ECOG scores and postoperative complications were also included. RESULTS As of December 2022, the mean OS was 62.1months (95%CI:55.6-68.6months) and the mean PFS was 45.0months (95%CI:35.9-54.1months). The median OS and median PFS were not reached. The 3-year OS rate was 70% and the 3-year PFS rate was 50%. The percentage of Clavien I and II complications was 15%. CONCLUSION For the selected patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma, the efficacy and safety of segmental ureterectomy were satisfactory. But we still need to conduct prospective or randomized study to validate the value of SU in patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wei
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Junfeng Liu
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lingdian Wang
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Duan
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Degang Ding
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Masson-Lecomte A, Vaillant V, Roumiguié M, Lévy S, Pradère B, Peyromaure M, Duquesne I, De La Taille A, Lebâcle C, Panis A, Traxer O, Leon P, Hulin M, Xylinas E, Audenet F, Seisen T, Loriot Y, Allory Y, Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y. Oncological Outcomes of Distal Ureterectomy for High-Risk Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study by The French Bladder Cancer Committee. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215452. [PMID: 36358870 PMCID: PMC9656759 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). It implies significant reduction in the renal function, compromising adjuvant chemotherapy administration and leading to risk of end stage renal disease in frail patients. Distal ureterectomy (DU) might be an alternative for tumors of the distal ureter but its indications remain unclear mainly due to concern about potential upper tract recurrences. The objective of our retrospective study was to determine the oncologic outcomes of DU for high-risk UTUC of the pelvic ureter, and to assess factors associated with recurrence in the particular population. We showed that oncological outcomes after DU were similar to those after RNU. Some of the classical prognostic factors after RNU were not identified in this cohort, pinpointing the necessity to consider tumors of the distal ureter as a specific entity. Abstract Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon disease and its gold-standard treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Distal ureterectomy (DU) might be an alternative for tumors of the distal ureter but its indications remain unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes of DU for UTUC of the pelvic ureter. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with UTUC who underwent DU. The primary endpoint was 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), followed by overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence-free (IVR) and homolateral urinary tract recurrence-free (HUR) survivals as secondary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to assess factors associated with outcomes. 155 patients were included, 91% of which were high-risk. 5-year CSS was 84.4%, OS was 71.9%, IVR-free survival was 43.6% and HUR-free survival was 74.4%. Multifocality, high grade and tumor size were the most significant predictors of survival endpoints. Of note, neither hydronephrosis nor pre-operative diagnostic ureteroscopy/JJ stent were associated with any of the endpoints. Perioperative morbidity was minimal. In conclusion, DU stands as a possible alternative to RNU for UTUC of the pelvic ureter. Close monitoring is mandatory due to the high risk of recurrence in the remaining urinary tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010 Paris, France
- Inserm, CEA, HIPI, Université Paris Cité, 75475 Paris, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Victoire Vaillant
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphan Lévy
- Department of Urology, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- Department of Urology-UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaël Peyromaure
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Igor Duquesne
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alexandre De La Taille
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Cédric Lebâcle
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Adrien Panis
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Olivier Traxer
- GRC 10 Lithiase Urinaire, Department of Urology, APHP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Priscilla Leon
- Department of Urology, clinique Pasteur, 17200 Royan, France
| | - Maud Hulin
- Department of Urology, clinique Pasteur, 17200 Royan, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Bichat Claude-Bernard, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Department of Urology, APHP, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Pathology, Curie Institute, University of Paris-Saclay–UVSQ, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Department of Urology, APHP, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Foch, University of Paris-Saclay–UVSQ, 92150 Suresnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kawada T, Laukhtina E, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Pallauf M, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Pradere B, Fajkovic H, Enikeev D, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Araki M, Shariat SF. Oncologic and Safety Outcomes for Endoscopic Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 9:236-240. [PMID: 36463089 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
We systematically reviewed the literature and summarized oncologic and safety outcomes for endoscopic management (EM) compared to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Studies comparing oncologic and/or safety results for EM versus RNU in patients with UTUC were included in our review. Overall, 13 studies met the criteria, and five studies were included in a meta-analysis using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS). EM was associated similar OS (HR 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-2.16), CSS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.99-1.91), and BRFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.61-1.55) to RNU, while 28-85% of patients treated with EM experienced upper tract recurrence across the studies. EM required more interventions with a higher cumulative risk of complications and lower likelihood of renal preservation. In summary, EM for low-grade UTUC had comparable survival outcomes to RNU at the cost of higher local recurrence rates resulting in a need for long-term rigorous surveillance and repeated interventions. PATIENT SUMMARY: For selected cases of cancer in the upper urinary tract, surgical treatment via a telescope inserted through the urethra or the skin (endoscope) results in cancer control outcomes that are comparable to those after removal of the kidney and ureter. However, because of its higher rate of local recurrence, this approach requires repeated endoscopic treatment sessions. Patients should be well informed about these issues to help in shared decision-making.
Collapse
|
14
|
Baard J, Cormio L, Cavadas V, Alcaraz A, Shariat SF, de la Rosette J, Laguna MP. Contemporary patterns of presentation, diagnostics and management of upper tract urothelial cancer in 101 centres: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global upper tract urothelial carcinoma registry. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:354-362. [PMID: 34009177 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To assess patterns of presentation, diagnostics and treatment in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a multicentre registry was launched. Clinical data of UTUC patients were prospectively collected over a 5-year period. RECENT FINDINGS Data from 2380 patients were included from 2014 to 2019 (101 centres in 29 countries). Patients were predominantly male (70.5%) and 53.3% were past or present smokers. The majority of patients (58.1%) were evaluated because of symptoms, mainly macroscopic hematuria. Computed tomography (CT) was the most common performed imaging modality (90.5%). A ureteroscopy (URS) was part of the diagnostic process in 1184 (49.7%) patients and 488 (20.5%) patients were treated endoscopically. In total, 1430 patients (60.1%) were treated by a radical nephroureterectomy, 59% without a prior diagnostic URS. Eighty-two patients (3.4%) underwent a segmental resection, 19 patients (0.8%) were treated by a percutaneous tumour resection. SUMMARY Our data is in line with the known epidemiologic characteristics of UTUC. CT imaging is the preferred imaging modality as also recommended by guidelines. Diagnostic URS gained a stronger position, however, in almost half of patients a definitive treatment decision was made without complete endoscopic information. Only one-third of patients with UTUC are currently treated with kidney sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Vitor Cavadas
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Department of Urology Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Motol Hospital Charles University, Praque, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, I.M. Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria P Laguna
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Endoscopic management versus radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a high endemic region. Sci Rep 2021; 11:4040. [PMID: 33597574 PMCID: PMC7889610 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83495-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to analyze the clinical and survival differences among patients who underwent the two main treatment modalities, endoscopic ablation and radical nephroureterectomy. This study examined all patients who had undergone endoscopic management and RNU between Jul. 1988 and Mar. 2019 from the Taiwan UTUC registry. The inclusion criteria were low stage UTUC in RNU and all cases in endoscopic managed UTUC with a curative intent. The demographic and clinical characteristics were included for analysis. In total, 84 cases in the endoscopic group and 272 cases in the RNU group were enrolled for final analysis. The median follow-up period were 33.5 and 42.0 months in endoscopic and RNU group, respectively (p = 0.082). Comparison of Kaplan–Meier estimated survival curves between groups, the endoscopic group was associated with similar overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRS) but demonstrated inferior disease free survival (DFS) (p = 0.188 for OS, p = 0.493 for CSS and p < 0.001 for DFS). Endoscopic management of UTUC was as safe as RNU in UTUC endemic region.
Collapse
|
16
|
Farrow JM, Kern SQ, Gryzinski GM, Sundaram CP. Nephron-sparing management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Investig Clin Urol 2021; 62:389-398. [PMID: 34190434 PMCID: PMC8246013 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is uncommon and presents unique challenges for diagnosis and management. Nephroureterectomy has been the preferred management option, but it is associated with significant morbidity. Nephron-sparing treatments are a valuable alternative and provide similar efficacy in select cases. A PubMed literature review was performed in English language publications using the following search terms: urothelial carcinoma, upper tract, nephron-sparing, intraluminal and systemic therapy. Contemporary papers published within the last 10 years were primarily included. Where encountered, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were given priority, as were randomized controlled trials for newer treatments. Core guidelines were referenced and citations reviewed for inclusion. A summary of epidemiological data, clinical diagnosis, staging, and treatments focusing on nephron-sparing approaches to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are outlined. Nephron-sparing management strategies are viable options to consider in patients with favorable features of UTUC. Adjunctive therapies are being investigated but the data remains mixed. Protocol variability and dosage differences limit statistical interpretation. New mechanisms to improve treatment dwell times in the upper tracts are being designed with promising preliminary results. Studies investigating systemic therapies are ongoing but implications for nephron-sparing management are uncertain. Nephron-sparing management is an acceptable treatment modality best suited for favorable disease. More work is needed to determine if intraluminal and/or systemic therapies can further optimize treatment outcomes beyond resection alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Farrow
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Sean Q Kern
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gustavo M Gryzinski
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Chandru P Sundaram
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raman JD. Adjuvant and ablative therapies for low-risk UTUC: avenues to enhance kidney preservation. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:433-434. [DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-0338-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
18
|
Yamada Y, Ukimura O, Kaneko M, Matsugasumi T, Fujihara A, Vourganti S, Marks L, Sidana A, Klotz L, Salomon G, de la Rosette J. Moving away from systematic biopsies: image-guided prostate biopsy (in-bore biopsy, cognitive fusion biopsy, MRUS fusion biopsy) -literature review. World J Urol 2020; 39:677-686. [PMID: 32728885 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03366-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the detection rate of clinically significant cancer (CSCa) by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) with that by standard systematic biopsy (SB) and to evaluate the role of MRI-TB as a replacement from SB in men at clinical risk of prostate cancer. METHODS The non-systematic literature was searched for peer-reviewed English-language articles using PubMed, including the prospective paired studies, where the index test was MRI-TB and the comparator text was SB. Also the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are included if one arm was MRI-TB and another arm was SB. RESULTS Eighteen prospective studies used both MRI-TB and TRUS-SB, and eight RCT received one of the tests for prostate cancer detection. In most prospective trials to compare MRI-TB vs. SB, there was no significant difference in any cancer detection rate; however, MRI-TB detected more men with CSCa and fewer men with CISCa than SB. CONCLUSION MRI-TB is superior to SB in detection of CSCa. Since some significant cancer was detected by SB only, a combination of SB with the TB technique would avoid the underdiagnosis of CSCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhiro Yamada
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
| | - Masatomo Kaneko
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Toru Matsugasumi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Atsuko Fujihara
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | | | - Leonard Marks
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Abhinav Sidana
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Georg Salomon
- Prostate Cancer Centre, Martini Clinic, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shan H, Tian W, Hong Y, Xu B, Wang C, Yu B, Wang X. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma complicated with aristolochic acid nephropathy after radical nephroureterectomy. BMC Complement Med Ther 2020; 20:166. [PMID: 32493345 PMCID: PMC7268428 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-2861-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to identify the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients complicated with aristolochic acid nephropathy(AAN) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods The clinical data of 42 UTUC patients with AAN (AAN group) and 238 UTUC patients without AAN (Non-AAN group) were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received a RNU with excision of bladder cuff. Demographic and clinical data, including preoperative indexes, intraoperative indexes and surgical outcomes were compared. Results There were no significant differences in age, tumor location, surgery approach, tumor pathologic grade, stage, the mean operative time and estimated blood loss between the two groups (all p > 0.05). There were more female patients in the AAN group (p < 0.001), and 57.1% were high grade tumors. The AAN group showed a higher complications rate (p = 0.003). The median follow-up time was 43.2 months. The AAN group showed a worse estimated 5-year overall survival rate (35.1% vs. 63.0%, p = 0.014), however, no significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to disease specific survival (63.5% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.091). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that AAN was an independent factor related with overall and disease specific survival. 38.9% of all patients experienced any types of recurrence, and the estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was lower in the AAN group (37.1% vs. 63.7%, p = 0.001). In the comparison of subgroups stratified by recurrence type, the AAN group had a higher intravesical (p = 0.030) and contralateral recurrence rate (p = 0.040). Conclusion UTUC with AAN occurred more frequently in female patients who were more likely to develop high-grade tumors. However, these patients showed a worse overall survival and a lower recurrence-free survival rate than the other patients. AA-related UTUC might be associate with an increased risk of intravesical and contralateral recurrence after RUN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongli Shan
- Department of clinical laboratory, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen Tian
- Department of Blood Transfusion, The Second Hospital of Jinlin University, Changchun, 131000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yazhao Hong
- Department of urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Xu
- Department of urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunxi Wang
- Department of urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China
| | - Bing Yu
- Department of urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xiaoqing Wang
- Department of urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aragon-Ching JB, Choudhury A, Margulis V, Yu EY. Formidable Scenarios in Urothelial and Variant Cancers of the Urinary Tract. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:262-275. [PMID: 31099661 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the field of bladder and upper tract cancers provide opportunities for multidisciplinary care. Urothelial cancers make up the majority of the histologic subtype of bladder and upper tract cancers. Although the existence of variant histology, nonurothelial cancers, and urethral cancers is rare, these cancers pose a challenging clinical dilemma given the lack of well-defined consensus treatment guidelines. This review focuses on key issues of treatment: cisplatin ineligibility with emphasis on the definition, nuances of chemotherapy and frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, use of radiation in bladder-preservation strategies, upper tract urothelial cancer management, and highlights of urothelial variants and nonurothelial tumors and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- 2 The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- 3 The Univeristy of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Evan Y Yu
- 4 University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hasan MN, Rouprêt M, Keeley F, Cracco C, Jones R, Straub M, Traxer O, Osther PJS, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of risk stratification: long-term results and follow-up. World J Urol 2019; 37:2289-2296. [PMID: 30944969 PMCID: PMC6825637 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02739-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To summarize current knowledge on upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) regarding risk stratification, long-term results, and follow-up. Methods A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase. Consensus was reached through discussions at Consultation on UTUC, September 2018, Stockholm. Results To optimize oncological outcome considering both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), it is essential to identify pre- and postoperative prognostic factors. In low-risk UTUC, kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) offer equivalent CSS, whereas RNU may result in poorer OS due to nephron loss. For more aggressive tumours, undergrading can lead to insufficient treatment. The strongest prognostic factors are tumour stage and grade. Determining grade is best achieved by ureterorenoscopy (URS) with focal samples, biopsy and cytology. Staging is more difficult but can be indirectly achieved by multiphase computed tomography urography (CTU) or tumour grade determined by cytology and histopathology. Patients treated with KSS should be monitored closely with regular follow-ups (URS and CTU). Conclusion KSS should be offered in low-risk UTUC when feasible, whereas RNU is the treatment of choice in organ-confined high-risk UTUC. Intravesical recurrence (IVR) is common after RNU, but a single postoperative dose of mitomycin instillation decreases IVR. Endourological management has high local and bladder recurrence rates; however, its effect on CSS or overall survival OS is unclear. RNU is associated with significant risk of chronic kidney disease. Careful selection of patients and risk stratification are mandatory, and patients should be followed according to strict protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mudhar N Hasan
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Francis Keeley
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Cecilia Cracco
- Department of Urology, Cottolengo Hospital of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Freifeld Y, Krabbe LM, Clinton TN, Woldu SL, Margulis V. Therapeutic strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:765-774. [PMID: 29848133 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1481395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many controversies exist regarding the appropriate management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), including staging, surgical management, use of systemic therapy, and prevention of bladder recurrence. Due to the rarity of this condition, high-level evidence is often lacking and in many cases guidelines are extrapolated from existing evidence on urothelial bladder cancer. Areas covered: This review paper summarizes the evidence on proper diagnosis and staging, surgical techniques, prevention of bladder recurrences, the use of local or systemic treatments in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings as well as special consideration for hereditary UTUC. Expert commentary: UTUC is a rare malignancy and slow progress is being made in the acquisition of high-quality evidence in this field. Treatments that facilitate preservation of the kidney are being explored such as advanced endoscopic techniques or partial resection of ureteral disease with seemingly acceptable oncological results. Further prospective evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval Freifeld
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA.,b Department of Urology , University of Muenster Medical Center , Muenster , Germany
| | - Timothy N Clinton
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Comparison of Radical Nephroureterectomy and Partial Ureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:2793172. [PMID: 29854736 PMCID: PMC5944270 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2793172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the oncological and renal outcomes of partial ureterectomy (PU) versus radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). UTUC patients' clinical information was reviewed, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and kidney function were collected. The mean follow-up period was 59 (6-135) months in the RNU group and 34.5 (5-135) months in the PU group. The mean operation time in the PU group was 141 (64-340) min, which is significantly shorter than the RNU group (P < 0.01). Regarding kidney function at one year or two years after operation, the PU group had significantly improved mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels and a remarkably decreased constitution of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) III or higher group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the RNU group and the PU group (P > 0.05). Multifactor Cox regression analysis indicated that age and the preoperative CKD stages were independent risk factors for poor kidney functions of UTUC patients. Compared to patients in RNU group, patients in PU have no significant difference in survival time but have shorter operation time, shorter hospital stay, and improved kidney functions.
Collapse
|
24
|
Re: Impact of Diagnostic Ureteroscopy on Intravesical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol 2018; 199:889-890. [PMID: 29642354 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
25
|
Campi R, Minervini A, Mari A, Hatzichristodoulou G, Sessa F, Lapini A, Sessa M, Gschwend JE, Serni S, Roscigno M, Carini M. Anatomical templates of lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:235-246. [PMID: 28103449 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1285232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indications and techniques of lymph node dissection (LND) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are still controversial. Areas covered: In this study, a systematic review of the English-language literature was performed up to 1 July 2016 using the Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Sciences databases to provide a detailed overview of the most commonly dissected surgical templates of LND for UTUC according to laterality and location of the tumor. Overall, sixteen studies were analyzed. Based on the shared experiences in the scientific literature, the LND template typically included: for right-sided tumors of the renal pelvis, upper third and middle third of the ureter, the renal hilar, paracaval, precaval and retrocaval nodes, while for left-sided tumors the renal hilar, paraaortic and preaortic nodes. For tumors of the lower ureter, an extended pelvic LND was performed in most cases; however, the paracaval, paraaortic or presacral nodes were dissected in selected series. Expert commentary: LND is not routinely performed at the time of surgery for UTUC and both indication and extent of LND vary among surgeons and institutions. Future high-quality studies are needed to define the most accurate LND templates and to assess their oncological efficacy and surgical morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- a Department of Urology , Careggi Hospital, University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- a Department of Urology , Careggi Hospital, University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- a Department of Urology , Careggi Hospital, University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| | - Georgios Hatzichristodoulou
- b Department of Urology , Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar , Munich , Germany
| | - Francesco Sessa
- a Department of Urology , Careggi Hospital, University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| | - Albero Lapini
- a Department of Urology , Careggi Hospital, University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| | - Maurizio Sessa
- c Department of Experimental Medicine , Section of Pharmacology 'L. Donatelli', II University of Naples , Naples , Italy
| | - Jurgen Erich Gschwend
- b Department of Urology , Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar , Munich , Germany
| | - Sergio Serni
- a Department of Urology , Careggi Hospital, University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| | - Marco Roscigno
- d Department of Urology , AO Papa Giovanni XXIII , Bergamo , Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- a Department of Urology , Careggi Hospital, University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abufaraj M, Moschini M, Soria F, Gust K, Özsoy M, Mathieu R, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Karam JA, Wood CG, Briganti A, Bensalah K, Haitel A, Shariat SF. Prognostic role of expression of N-cadherin in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. World J Urol 2016; 35:1073-1080. [PMID: 27830374 PMCID: PMC5486535 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1968-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the role of N-cadherin as prognostic biomarker in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in a large multi-institutional cohort of patients. Patients and methods Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the status of N-cadherin expression in 678 patients with unilateral sporadic UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. N-cadherin was considered positive if any immunoreactivity with membranous staining was detected. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate recurrence-free survival, overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Disease recurrence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality probabilities were tested in Cox regression models. Results Expression of N-cadherin was observed in 292 (43.1%) of patients, and it was associated with advanced tumour stage (p < 0.04), lymph node metastases (p = 0.04) and sessile architecture (p < 0.02). Within a median follow-up of 37.5 months (IQR 20–66), 171 patients (25.2%) experienced disease recurrence and 150 (22.1%) died from UTUC. In univariable analyses, N-cadherin expression was significantly associated with higher probability of recurrence (p = 0.01), but not overall (p = 0.9) or cancer-specific mortality (p = 0.06). When adjusted for the effects of all available confounders, N-cadherin was not associated with any of the survival outcomes. Conclusion N-cadherin is expressed in approximately 2/5 of UTUs. It is associated with adverse pathologic factors but not with survival outcomes. Its clinical value remains limited. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1968-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Kilian Gust
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mehmet Özsoy
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris VI, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. .,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. .,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. .,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mbeutcha A, Mathieu R, Rouprêt M, Gust KM, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature. Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5:720-734. [PMID: 27785429 PMCID: PMC5071205 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.09.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In the context of customized patient care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), decision-making could be facilitated by risk assessment and prediction tools. The aim of this study was to provide a critical overview of existing predictive models and to review emerging promising prognostic factors for UTUC. A literature search of articles published in English from January 2000 to June 2016 was performed using PubMed. Studies on risk group stratification models and predictive tools in UTUC were selected, together with studies on predictive factors and biomarkers associated with advanced-stage UTUC and oncological outcomes after surgery. Various predictive tools have been described for advanced-stage UTUC assessment, disease recurrence and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Most of these models are based on well-established prognostic factors such as tumor stage, grade and lymph node (LN) metastasis, but some also integrate newly described prognostic factors and biomarkers. These new prediction tools seem to reach a high level of accuracy, but they lack external validation and decision-making analysis. The combinations of patient-, pathology- and surgery-related factors together with novel biomarkers have led to promising predictive tools for oncological outcomes in UTUC. However, external validation of these predictive models is a prerequisite before their introduction into daily practice. New models predicting response to therapy are urgently needed to allow accurate and safe individualized management in this heterogeneous disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Mbeutcha
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; ; Department of Urology, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, University Paris VI, Paris, France
| | - Kilian M Gust
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Ospedale S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; ; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; ; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fang D, Seisen T, Yang K, Liu P, Fan X, Singla N, Xiong G, Zhang L, Li X, Zhou L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:1625-1635. [PMID: 27612412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative studies reporting oncological and renal function outcomes of segmental ureterectomy (SU) versus radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search on Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, and a meta-analysis was performed to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS) and surgery-related variations in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS A total of 11 retrospective studies with 3963 patients who underwent either SU (n = 983; 24.8%) or RNU (n = 2980; 75.2%) were included. Although patients treated with SU were more likely to be diagnosed with favorable pathological features, the meta-analysis of unadjusted data revealed no significant difference between both groups in terms of CSS (HR 0.90, p = 0.33) and OS (HR 0.98, p = 0.93). Accordingly, the meta-analysis of adjusted data confirmed equivalent CSS (HR = 0.90, p = 0.47) between SU and RNU. Similarly, no significant difference was found in terms of RFS (HR 1.06, p = 0.72) and IVRFS (HR 1.35, p = 0.39). However, a significant decreased risk of impaired renal function was observed after SU when compared to RNU (mean eGFR difference = 9.32 ml/1.73 m2, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Although adverse patient and tumor characteristics were not equally balanced between treatment arms, our systematic review and meta-analysis supports similar oncological outcomes between SU and RNU, with better preservation of renal function after SU. As such, SU should be preferably used as the first-line treatment for low-risk ureter tumors, while considered for selected cases of high-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China
| | - T Seisen
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris F-75013, France; UPMC University Paris 06, GRC5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Paris F-75005, France
| | - K Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China
| | - P Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China
| | - X Fan
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107 Yanjiang West Rd, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - N Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - G Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China
| | - L Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China
| | - X Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
| | - L Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Seisen T, Peyronnet B, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Bruins HM, Yuan CY, Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, Kaasinen E, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Sylvester RJ, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M. Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2016; 70:1052-1068. [PMID: 27477528 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 199] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT There is uncertainty regarding the oncologic effectiveness of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) compared with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVE To systematically review the current literature comparing oncologic outcomes of KSS versus RNU for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A computerised bibliographic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies reporting comparative oncologic outcomes of KSS versus RNU. Approaches considered for KSS were segmental ureterectomy (SU) and ureteroscopic (URS) or percutaneous (PC) management. Using the methodology recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, we identified 22 nonrandomised comparative retrospective studies published between 1999 and 2015 that were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. A narrative review and risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment were performed using cancer-specific survival (CSS) as the primary end point. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seven studies compared KSS overall (n=547) versus RNU (n=1376). Information on the comparison of SU (n=586) versus RNU (n=3692), URS (n=162) versus RNU (n=367), and PC (n=66) versus RNU (n=114) was available in 10, 5, and 2 studies, respectively. No significant difference was found between SU and RNU in terms of CSS or any other oncologic outcomes. Only patients with low-grade and noninvasive tumours experienced similar CSS after URS or PC when compared with RNU, despite an increased risk of local recurrence following endoscopic management of UTUC. The RoB assessment revealed, however, that the analyses were subject to a selection bias favouring KSS. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review suggests similar survival after KSS versus RNU only for low-grade and noninvasive UTUC when using URS or PC. However, selected patients with high-grade and invasive UTUC could safely benefit from SU when feasible. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of selection bias. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the studies that compared kidney-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We found similar oncologic outcomes for favourable tumours when using ureteroscopic or percutaneous management, whereas indications for segmental ureterectomy could be extended to selected cases of aggressive tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Seisen
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris; Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris 6, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Harman M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Andreas Böhle
- Department of Urology, HELIOS Agnes-Karll-Krankenhaus, Bad Schwartau, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpétrière, UPMC, Paris, France
| | - Nigel C Cowan
- Radiology Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Eero Kaasinen
- Department of Urology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris; Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris 6, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. World J Urol 2016; 35:337-353. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1826-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
|
31
|
Gakis G, Schubert T, Alemozaffar M, Bellmunt J, Bochner BH, Boorjian SA, Daneshmand S, Huang WC, Kondo T, Konety BR, Laguna MP, Matin SF, Siefker-Radtke AO, Shariat SF, Stenzl A. Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on upper tract urothelial carcinoma 2016: treatment of localized high-risk disease. World J Urol 2016; 35:327-335. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1819-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|