1
|
Popeneciu IV, Mohr MN, Strauß A, Leitsmann C, Trojan L, Reichert M. Personalized Treatment Strategy in "Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Candidates" Using Irreversible Electroporation: Prospective Evaluation of Feasibility, Morbidity, Functional and Oncological Outcomes. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:821-829. [PMID: 38311374 PMCID: PMC11439813 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the morbidity, functional and oncological outcome of irreversible electroporation (IRE) as a focal therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) when used in "active surveillance (AS)" candidates refusing standard treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS IRE was performed under general anaesthesia, and the transurethral catheter was removed one day after intervention in all patients. Pre- and post-interventional voiding parameters (measured by International Prostate Symptom Score Questionnaire [IPSS], uroflowmetry and post-void residue) were compared. Follow-up (FU) was observed over a minimum of six months, including oncological outcome (controlled by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, rebiopsy, prostate-specific antigen dynamic as well as the need and type of secondary treatment) and general functional outcome (International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire, satisfaction of the procedure). RESULTS Twenty-four patients refusing AS or standard treatment with a median FU of 18.7 months were included. IPSS showed nine patients with mild, 12 with moderate and two with severe obstructive voiding symptoms pre-intervention (focal IRE). Median IPSS pre-IRE was 9 points, 8.5 (p=0.341) at six months and 10 (p=0.392) after 12 months, respectively. Pre-IRE maximum urinary flow (Qmax) (median: 16.1±8.0 mL/sec) and Qmax after catheter removal (16.2±7.6 mL/sec) did not differ significantly (p=0.904). Thirteen PCa recurrences occurred (54.2%). Out-of-lesion-PCa was found in 12/13 patients (92.3%), while 4/13 patients showed in-lesion-PCa recurrence simultaneously (30.8%). In one patient, there was an in-lesion-PCa recurrence only (7.7%). Six out of 24 patients (25.0%) received a secondary treatment. All patients were satisfied with the IRE procedure. CONCLUSIONS Focal IRE underperforms regarding the overall oncological outcome and should not be offered as an equivalent therapy to established curative treatment strategies. Nevertheless, under a strict FU regimen, its lack of significant additional morbidity compared to an active surveillance strategy makes IRE a feasible alternative for low-risk PCa in highly selected patients as a personalised approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ionel Valentin Popeneciu
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettigen, Germany
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Mirjam Naomi Mohr
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettigen, Germany
| | - Arne Strauß
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettigen, Germany
| | - Conrad Leitsmann
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettigen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettigen, Germany
| | - Mathias Reichert
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettigen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang K, Teoh J, Zhu G, Ng CF, Suberville M, Laguna P, de la Rosette J. Irreversible Electroporation for the Focal Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:42.e65. [PMID: 39028129 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.240012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a promising alternative treatment for low-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. In this systematic review we aim to evaluate the safety profile and functional and oncological outcomes of this new technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus up to 24 August 2023. Nineteen studies were analyzed, including 12 prospective studies and 7 retrospective studies. A total of 1,452 patients underwent IRE as the sole primary treatment modality. RESULTS The in-field clinically significant prostate cancer rate was reported between 0%-15.6% in the repeat biopsy. The retreatment rate was reported from 8% to 36.6%. The 3 years failure-free survival was presented between 90%-96.8%. The post-operative pad-free rate ranged between 96.7%-100%. Greater heterogeneity exists considering the change in erectile function. The most common reported complications were urinary tract infection and hematuria. Major complications were rare. CONCLUSIONS These results underline that IRE achieves favorable oncological control with an excellent safety profile, in the meantime preserving patients' urinary and erectile function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing United Family Hospital and Clinics, Beijing, China
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Gang Zhu
- Department of Urology, Beijing United Family Hospital and Clinics, Beijing, China
| | - Chi-Fai Ng
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Michel Suberville
- Department of Urology, Pôle Saint Germain Centre Hospitalier de BRIVE, Brive la Gaillarde, France
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rajagopalan NR, Munawar T, Sheehan MC, Fujimori M, Vista WR, Wimmer T, Gutta NB, Solomon SB, Srimathveeravalli G. Electrolysis products, reactive oxygen species and ATP loss contribute to cell death following irreversible electroporation with microsecond-long pulsed electric fields. Bioelectrochemistry 2024; 155:108579. [PMID: 37769509 PMCID: PMC10841515 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Membrane permeabilization and thermal injury are the major cause of cell death during irreversible electroporation (IRE) performed using high electric field strength (EFS) and small number of pulses. In this study, we explored cell death under conditions of reduced EFS and prolonged pulse application, identifying the contributions of electrolysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ATP loss. We performed ablations with conventional high-voltage low pulse (HV-LP) and low-voltage high pulse (LV-HP) conditions in a 3D tumor mimic, finding equivalent ablation volumes when using 2000 V/cm 90 pulses or 1000 V/cm 900 pulses respectively. These results were confirmed by performing ablations in swine liver. In LV-HP treatment, ablation volume was found to increase proportionally with pulse numbers, without the substantial temperature increase seen with HV-LP parameters. Peri-electrode pH changes, ATP loss and ROS production were seen in both conditions, but LV-HP treatments were more sensitive to blocking of these forms of cell injury. Increases in current drawn during HV-LP was not observed during LV-HP condition where the total ablation volume correlated to the charge delivered into the tissue which was greater than HV-LP treatment. LV-HP treatment provides a new paradigm in using pulsed electric fields for tissue ablation with clinically relevant volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tarek Munawar
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Mary Chase Sheehan
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | | | - William-Ray Vista
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Wimmer
- Dept. of Radiology, Division of General Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | | | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA; Institute for Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Faiella E, Santucci D, Vertulli D, Vergantino E, Vaccarino F, Perillo G, Beomonte Zobel B, Grasso RF. Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) for Prostate Cancer (PCa) Treatment: The State of the Art. J Pers Med 2024; 14:137. [PMID: 38392571 PMCID: PMC10890194 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the most recent research from 2000 to 2023 in order to deeply investigate the applications of PCa IRE, first exploring its usage with primary intent and then salvage intent. Finally, we discuss the differences with other focal PCa treatments. In the case of primary-intent IRE, the in-field recurrence is quite low (ranges from 0% to 33%). Urinary continence after the treatment remains high (>86%). Due to several different patients in the studies, the preserved potency varied quite a lot (59-100%). Regarding complications, the highest occurrence rates are for those of Grades I and II (20-77% and 0-29%, respectively). Grade III complications represent less than 7%. Regarding the specific oncological outcomes, both PCa-specific survival and overall survival are 100%. Metastasis-free survival is 99.6%. In a long-term study, the Kaplan-Meier FFS rates reported are 91% at 3 years, 84% at 5 years, and 69% at 8 years. In the single study with salvage-intent IRE, the in-field recurrence was 7%. Urinary continence was still high (93%), but preserved potency was significantly lower than primary-intent IRE patients (23%). In addition, Grade III complications were slightly higher (10.8%). In conclusion, in males with localized low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer, IRE had an excellent safety profile and might have positive results for sexual and urinary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliodoro Faiella
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Domiziana Santucci
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Vertulli
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Elva Vergantino
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Vaccarino
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Gloria Perillo
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Beomonte Zobel
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosario Francesco Grasso
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Campus Bio-medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prabhakar P, Avudaiappan AP, Sandman M, Eldefrawy A, Caso J, Narayanan G, Manoharan M. Irreversible electroporation as a focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review. Indian J Urol 2024; 40:6-16. [PMID: 38314081 PMCID: PMC10836445 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_370_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new and promising focal therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In this systematic review, we summarize the literature on IRE for prostate cancer published over the last decade. Methods PubMed and EMBASE were searched with the end date of May 2023 to find relevant publications on prostate cancer ablation using IRE. Original studies with focal IRE as the primary curative treatment which reported on functional or oncological outcomes were included. The bibliography of relevant studies was also scanned to identify suitable articles. Results A total of 14 studies reporting on 899 patients treated with IRE for localized prostate cancer were included. Of all the studies reviewed, 77% reported on recurrence within the zone of ablation, and it ranged from 0% to 38.9% for in-field and 3.6% to 28% for out-of-field recurrence. Although, a standardised follow-up protocol was not followed, all the studies employed serial prostate-specific antigen monitoring, a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and a biopsy (6-12 months post-treatment). Across all the studies, 58% reported that the urinary continence returned to the pretreatment levels and 25% reported a minor decrease in the continence from the baseline at 12-months of follow-up. Erections sufficient for intercourse varied from 44% to 75% at the baseline to 55% to 100% at 12-months of follow-up across all the studies. Conclusion IRE, as a focal therapy, shows promising results with minimal complications and reasonably effective oncological control, but the data comparing it to the standard of care is still lacking. Future research should focus on randomized definitive comparisons between IRE, radical prostatectomy, and radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushan Prabhakar
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Mayer Sandman
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ahmed Eldefrawy
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jorge Caso
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Govindarajan Narayanan
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Murugesan Manoharan
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Real-World Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Irreversible Electroporation and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Ablation. Urology 2023; 174:7-17. [PMID: 36736917 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative safety and effectiveness of 2 prostate cancer treatment ablation modalities: irreversible electroporation (IRE) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). METHODS: Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on IRE and HIFU were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed and EMBASE. Independent reviewers assessed literature eligibility and abstracted safety and effectiveness data. Oncological, safety, functional, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were examined for each technology. MAs were conducted where data quality and availability allowed, using normal methods and a random/mixed effects model, and quality assessments performed. RESULTS Fifty-five publications (n = 22 IRE; n = 33 HIFU) were included in the SLRs, and MAs were conducted on negative in-field post-procedure biopsy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level reduction, potency, urinary continence, and AE rate outcomes. MAs revealed that IRE patients had lower mean percent PSA level reductions, higher mean rates of in-field negative post-treatment biopsy, and higher rates of potency maintenance than HIFU patients. Most adverse events (AEs) reported were comparable and minor (Grades I, II), with urinary tract infection, dysuria, hematuria, and incontinence or urgency most frequently reported. The proportion of patients experiencing a severe AE (≥Grade III) ranged from 0 to 8% after IRE and HIFU. Both modalities were associated with positive functional outcomes as well as maintenance of QOL after treatment. CONCLUSIONS Both IRE and HIFU were found to produce favorable effectiveness outcomes and have low complication rates while minimally impacting patient urinary and erectile function and maintaining overall QOL. These real-world findings can help guide clinical decision making and improve disease management for patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
7
|
Effects of different applied voltages of irreversible electroporation on prostate cancer in a mouse model. Sci Rep 2022; 12:22336. [PMID: 36572706 PMCID: PMC9792528 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25258-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
As a non-thermal ablation method, irreversible electroporation (IRE) has been widely investigated in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, no consensus has been achieved on the optimal parameters of IRE for prostate cancer. Since high voltage is known to carry risks of muscle contraction and patient discomfort, it is crucial to identify the minimum but effective and safer applied voltage to inhibit tumor growth. In this study, the effect of different applied voltages of IRE on prostate cancer was evaluated in BALB/c nude mice. Mathematical simulation and measurement of the actual ablation area revealed a larger ablation area at a higher voltage. In in vivo experiment, except for the three different voltages applied, all groups received identical electrical conditions: pulse number, 180 (20 groups × 9 pulses/group); pulse width, 100 µs; pulse interval, 2 ms; distance between the electrodes, 5 mm; and electrode exposure length, 15 mm. Whilst the tumor volume initially decreased in the 500 V (1000 V/cm) and 700 V (1400 V/cm) groups and subsequently increased, only a transient increase followed by a continuous decrease until the sacrifice was observed in the 900 V (1800 V/cm) group. This result demonstrated a lasting effect of a higher applied voltage on tumor growth inhibition. The histological, immunohistochemical, and western blot findings all confirmed IRE-induced apoptosis in the treatment groups. Taken together, 900 V seemed to be the minimum applied voltage required to reduce tumor growth, though subsequent studies are anticipated to further narrow the voltage intervals and lower the minimum voltage required for tumor inhibition.
Collapse
|
8
|
Tasu JP, Tougeron D, Rols MP. Irreversible electroporation and electrochemotherapy in oncology: State of the art. Diagn Interv Imaging 2022; 103:499-509. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
9
|
Herr H, Sogani P, Eastham J. Genitourinary tumors. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:926-932. [PMID: 36087085 PMCID: PMC10671100 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) has made many notable contributions to the scientific understanding and care of patients with common urologic cancers. Many of the advances represented paradigm shifts in management and established new standards of care. This review highlights the surgical procedures and treatment strategies originated and pioneered by urologic surgeons and colleagues at MSK during the past 50 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pramod Sogani
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang H, Xue W, Yan W, Yin L, Dong B, He B, Yu Y, Shi W, Zhou Z, Lin H, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Shi Z, Ren S, Gao X, Wang L, Xu C. Extended Focal Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer With High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:693-700. [PMID: 35793110 PMCID: PMC9260646 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Focal therapy of prostate cancer must balance the oncologic outcome and functional outcome. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) can destroy cancer cells while selectively preserving surrounding nerves and blood vessels, but no clinical trials have been conducted, to our knowledge. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of H-FIRE in the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a single-group, objective performance criteria, nonrandomized controlled trial. Recruitment began on May 2, 2018, and ended March 27, 2019. The follow-up duration was 6 months. This was a multicenter trial conducted at 4 tertiary teaching hospitals in China. Patients with low or intermediate risk of biochemical recurrence of localized and locally advanced PCa were eligible. Key inclusion criteria were serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 20 ng/mL, clinical stage of T2c or less, and Gleason score of 7 or less. Data were analyzed from January 20 to February 20, 2021. INTERVENTION H-FIRE ablation of all lesions identified with biopsy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was 6-month clinically significant PCa (csPCa), which was defined as any biopsy core with Gleason score of greater than or equal to 7, or Gleason score of 6 plus maximum cancer core length of greater than 3 mm or an increase from the original cancer burden. Secondary outcomes were calculated in patients who actually received H-FIRE treatment. RESULTS A total of 117 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [62-73] years) were recruited from 4 centers, and 109 patients (27 [24.8%] low risk and 82 [75.2%] intermediate risk) actually received H-FIRE. Median (IQR) PSA level was 9.0 (6.0-12.7) ng/mL. Among the 100 patients who underwent biopsy at 6 months, the 6-month csPCa rate was 6.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-12.6%; P < .001; 1 in the treatment zone and 5 outside the treatment zone). Superiority criteria vs the historical control of 20% was achieved. PCa was detected in 14 patients, with a Gleason score of 7 in 2 patients and 6 in the remaining 12 patients. At 6 months, median (IQR) PSA level was 1.08 (0.4-3.2) ng/mL, median (IQR) International Prostate Symptom Score was 4.5 (2.0-9.5), and median (IQR) International Index of Erectile Function 5 score was 2.0 (0.5-12.5). Superiority vs the 20% historical control was also met in the subgroup analysis that only included the 57 patients with Gleason score of 7 at baseline (3.5% 6-month csPCa; 95% CI, 0.4%-12.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The rate of 6-month csPCa with H-FIRE ablation was lower than the historical control using other energy platforms. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03838432.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haifeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weigang Yan
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Yin
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Baijun Dong
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Biming He
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongwei Yu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Shi
- Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhien Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hengzhi Lin
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yanqing Wang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenkai Shi
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shancheng Ren
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu Gao
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuanliang Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fiard G, Chowdhury A, Potter AR, Pook CJ, Kelly D, Emberton M, Yap T. Detailing Sexual Outcomes After Focal Therapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:926-941. [PMID: 34580049 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Focal therapy has emerged as a promising option to treat well-selected men with localised prostate cancer while preserving healthy prostate tissue and key structures, such as the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles. However, how this tissue preservation may translate into improved outcomes, particularly into improved sexual outcomes, is still an active research field. OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to summarise the existing evidence, in order to provide patients with updated data on what to expect after treatment and help identify gaps in current knowledge that may warrant future research. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search was conducted on Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was defined using the "litsearchr" function in R based on a preliminary "naïve" search using the following terms on Medline: (("focal therapy" OR "focal treatment") AND ("prostate cancer") AND ("sexual function" OR "erectile function")). A total of 42 studies, comprising 3117 patients treated and 2352 with available sexual outcomes, were included in the qualitative data synthesis and 26 in a random-effect meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was the most frequently used questionnaire (30/42 studies), with completion rates ranging from 24% to 100% at 18-24 mo. A decrease was noted at 3 mo (IIEF-5 decrease estimate -3.70 [95% confidence interval -4.43, -2.96]), with improvements at 6 mo (-2.18 [-2.91, -1.46]) and 12 mo (-2.14 [-2.96, -1.32]). Studies in which patients had an altered baseline sexual function were more likely to report a significant and durable postoperative decrease in erectile function scores. The patient-reported outcome questionnaires used were not designed for a diverse population. Functional outcomes were not the primary endpoint and have not been reported consistently in most studies considered. CONCLUSIONS Focal therapy led to changes in erectile function in most cases under the significance threshold of the patient-reported outcome questionnaires used. However, patients should be counselled according to their baseline erectile function. More research is warranted to detail aspects other than erectile function, such as ejaculation or orgasm. The early postoperative period appears key to study sexual changes after focal therapy, while only a moderate decrease is expected at 12 mo. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the published literature detailing the sexual consequences of focal therapy for localised prostate cancer using patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Patients were likely to describe a significant decrease in their erectile function at 3 mo, with improvements noted at 6 and 12 mo. The results obtained may not be reproducible in a more diverse population, and further research is warranted to better study aspects other than erectile function, such as ejaculation or orgasm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaelle Fiard
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France; Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France.
| | - Aminah Chowdhury
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Aneirin R Potter
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Celina J Pook
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tet Yap
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hopstaken JS, Bomers JGR, Sedelaar MJP, Valerio M, Fütterer JJ, Rovers MM. An Updated Systematic Review on Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: What Has Changed over the Past 5 Years? Eur Urol 2021; 81:5-33. [PMID: 34489140 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Focal therapy is a promising, minimally invasive strategy to selectively treat localized prostate cancer. A previous systematic review indicated that there is growing evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but that oncological effectiveness was yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of focal therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies between October 2015 and December 31, 2020. In addition, the research stages were acquired according to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) recommendations. Ongoing studies were identified through clinical trial registries. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seventy-two studies were identified exploring eight different sources of energy to deliver focal therapy in 5827 patients. Twenty-seven studies reported on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), nine studies on irreversible electroporation, 11 on cryoablation, eight on focal laser ablation and focal brachytherapy, seven on photodynamic therapy (PDT), two on radiofrequency ablation, and one on prostatic artery embolization. The majority of studies were prospective development stage 2a studies (n = 35). PDT and HIFU, both in stage 3, showed promising results. Overall, HIFU studies reported a median of 95% pad-free patients and a median of 85% patients with no clinically significant cancer (CSC) in the treated area. For PDT, no changes in continence were reported and a median of 90% of patients were without CSC. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Over the past 5 yr, focal therapy has been studied for eight different energy sources, mostly in single-arm stage 2 studies. Although a first randomized controlled trial in focal therapy has been performed, more high-quality evaluations are needed, preferably via multicenter randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up and predefined assessment of oncological and functional outcomes and health-related quality-of-life measures. PATIENT SUMMARY Focal treatment (FT) of prostate cancer has potential, considering that it has less impact on continence and potency than radical treatment. Our systematic review indicates that despite the method being studied extensively over the past half decade, the majority of studies remain in an early research stage. The techniques high-intensity focused ultrasound and photodynamic therapy have shown most progression toward advanced research stages and show favorable results. However, more high-quality evidence is required before FT can become available as a standard treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana S Hopstaken
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joyce G R Bomers
- Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel J P Sedelaar
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jurgen J Fütterer
- Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tracey AT, Nogueira LM, Alvim RG, Coleman JA, Murray KS. Focal therapy for primary and salvage prostate cancer treatment: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:3144-3154. [PMID: 34430417 PMCID: PMC8350247 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite innovations in surgical technology and advancements in radiation therapy, radical treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer are associated with significant patient morbidity, including both urinary and sexual dysfunction. This has created a vital need for therapies and management strategies that provide an acceptable degree of oncologic efficacy while mitigating these undesirable side effects. Successful developments in screening approaches and advances in prostate imaging have allowed clinicians to identify, localize, and more precisely target early cancers. This has afforded urologists with an important opportunity to develop and employ focal ablation techniques that selectively destroy tumors while preserving the remainder of the gland, thus avoiding detrimental treatment effects to surrounding sensitive structures. A lack of high-level evidence supporting such an approach had previously hindered widespread adoption of focal treatments, but there are now numerous published clinical trials which have sought to establish benchmarks for safety and efficacy. As the clinical evidence supporting a potential role in prostate cancer treatment begins to accumulate, there has been a growing acceptance of focal therapy in the urologic oncology community. In this narrative review article, we describe the techniques, advantages, and side effect profiles of the most commonly utilized focal ablative techniques and analyze published clinical trial data supporting their evolving role in the prostate cancer treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T Tracey
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lucas M Nogueira
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ricardo G Alvim
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katie S Murray
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tollens F, Westhoff N, von Hardenberg J, Clausen S, Ehmann M, Zöllner FG, Adlung A, Bauer DF, Schoenberg SO, Nörenberg D. [MRI-guided minimally invasive treatment of prostate cancer]. Radiologe 2021; 61:829-838. [PMID: 34251481 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00883-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and local staging of primary prostate cancer. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS Image-guided biopsy techniques such as MRI-ultrasound fusion not only allow guidance for targeted tissue sampling of index lesions for diagnostic confirmation, but also improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS Minimally invasive, focal therapies of localized prostate cancer complement the treatment spectrum, especially for low- and intermediate-risk patients. PERFORMANCE In patients of low and intermediate risk, MR-guided, minimally invasive therapies could enable local tumor control, improved functional outcomes and possible subsequent therapy escalation. Further study results related to multimodal approaches and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) by machine and deep learning algorithms will help to leverage the full potential of focal therapies for prostate cancer in the upcoming era of precision medicine. ACHIEVEMENTS Completion of ongoing randomized trials comparing each minimally invasive therapy approach with established whole-gland procedures is needed before minimally invasive therapies can be implemented into existing treatment guidelines. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS This review article highlights minimally invasive therapies of prostate cancer and the key role of mpMRI for planning and conducting these therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Tollens
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Niklas Westhoff
- Klinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Jost von Hardenberg
- Klinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Sven Clausen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Michael Ehmann
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Frank G Zöllner
- Computerunterstützte Klinische Medizin, Mannheimer Institut für Intelligente Systeme in der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Anne Adlung
- Computerunterstützte Klinische Medizin, Mannheimer Institut für Intelligente Systeme in der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Dominik F Bauer
- Computerunterstützte Klinische Medizin, Mannheimer Institut für Intelligente Systeme in der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Stefan O Schoenberg
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Dominik Nörenberg
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ong S, Leonardo M, Chengodu T, Bagguley D, Lawrentschuk N. Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Cancer. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11060490. [PMID: 34071934 PMCID: PMC8230282 DOI: 10.3390/life11060490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Although it can be lethal in its advanced stage, prostate cancer can be effectively treated when it is localised. Traditionally, radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) were used to treat all men with localised prostate cancer; however, this has significant risks of post-treatment side effects. Focal therapy has emerged as a potential form of treatment that can achieve similar oncological outcomes to radical treatment while preserving functional outcomes and decreasing rates of adverse effects. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is one such form of focal therapy which utilises pulsatile electrical currents to ablate tissue. This modality of treatment is still in an early research phase, with studies showing that IRE is a safe procedure that can offer good short-term oncological outcomes whilst carrying a lower risk of poor functional outcomes. We believe that based on these results, future well-designed clinical trials are warranted to truly assess its efficacy in treating men with localised prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Ong
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia; (S.O.); (T.C.); (D.B.)
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
| | - Matthew Leonardo
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
- Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat 10430, Indonesia
| | - Thilakavathi Chengodu
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia; (S.O.); (T.C.); (D.B.)
| | - Dominic Bagguley
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia; (S.O.); (T.C.); (D.B.)
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia; (S.O.); (T.C.); (D.B.)
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-03-9329-1197
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, irreversible electroporation, and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:461-484. [PMID: 33387088 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01847-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Cryoablation (CA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), irreversible electroporation (IRE), and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) have been evaluated as novel strategies for selected patients with prostate cancer (PCa). We aim to determine the current status of literature regarding the clinical outcomes among these minimally invasive therapies. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all English literature published from January 2001 to December 2019 was conducted to identify studies evaluating outcomes of CA, HIFU, IRE or VTP on PCa. Proportionality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using STATA version 14.0. 56 studies consisting of 7383 participants were found to report data of interest and fulfilled the inclusion criteria in the final meta-analysis. The pooled proportions of positive biopsy after procedure were 20.0%, 24.3%, 24.2%, and 36.2% in CA, HIFU, IRE and VTP, respectively. The pooled proportions of BRFS were 75.7% for CA and 74.4% for HIFU. The pooled proportions of CSS were 96.1%, 98.2%, and 97.9% for CA, HIFU, and IRE, respectively. The pooled proportions of OS were 92.8% for CA and 85.2% for HIFU. The pooled proportions of FFS were 64.7%, 90.4%, and 76.7% for CA, IRE and VTP, respectively. The pooled proportions of MFS were 92.8% for HIFU and 99.1% for IRE. This meta-analysis shows that CA, HIFU, IRE, and VTP are promising therapies for PCa patients with similar clinical outcomes. However, further larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this assertion.
Collapse
|
17
|
Basourakos SP, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Bianco FJ, Patel NA, Laviana A, Margolis DJ, Mosquera JM, McClure TD, Yu M, Hu JC. Feasibility of in-office MRI-targeted partial gland cryoablation for prostate cancer: an IDEAL stage 2A study. BMJ SURGERY, INTERVENTIONS, & HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES 2020; 2:e000056. [PMID: 35047795 PMCID: PMC8749259 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cryoablation for prostate cancer is typically performed under general anaesthesia. We explore the safety, feasibility and costs of in-office MRI-targeted prostate partial gland cryoablation (PGC) under local anaesthesia. We hypothesise that an office-based procedure under local anaesthesia may yield greater patient convenience and lower health costs with similar outcomes to a general anaesthesia approach. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS/SETTING/INTERVENTIONS Retrospective study of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (grade group (GG) ≥2) who elected to undergo in-office PGC under local anaesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A total of 55 men with GG ≥2 prostate cancer underwent PGC under local anaesthesia, and 35 of 43 men (81.4%) who attained ≥6 months of follow-up post-treatment underwent MRI-targeted surveillance biopsy. We used MRI findings and targeted biopsy to characterise post-PGC oncological outcomes. Complications were categorised using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Clinical Practice was used to characterise urinary and sexual function scores at baseline, 4 and 9 months post-PGC. Time-driven activity-based costing was used to determine healthcare costs of in-office PGC. RESULTS Five (9.1%) men experienced CTCAE score 3 adverse events. Urinary and sexual function did not change significantly from baseline to 4 months (p=0.20 and p=0.08, respectively) and 9 months (p=0.23 and p=0.67, respectively). Twenty-two men (62.9%) had no cancer or GG1 and 13 (37.1%) men had GG≥2 on post-PGC biopsy. Moreover, the median cost of in-office PGC was US$4,463.05 (range US$4,087.19-US7,238.16) with disposables comprising 69% of the cost. CONCLUSIONS In-office PGC is feasible under local anaesthesia with favourable functional outcome preservation and adverse events profile at significantly lower costs compared with a general anaesthesia approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon P Basourakos
- Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Neal A Patel
- Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aaron Laviana
- Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Daniel J Margolis
- Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan M Mosquera
- Pathology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Timothy D McClure
- Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miko Yu
- Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jim C Hu
- Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scheltema MJ, Chang JI, van den Bos W, Böhm M, Delprado W, Gielchinsky I, de Reijke TM, de la Rosette JJ, Siriwardana AR, Shnier R, Stricker PD. Preliminary Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Residual Prostate Cancer Following Focal Therapy with Irreversible Electroporation. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 5:585-591. [PMID: 29102671 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is recommended to perform multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the follow-up following focal therapy of prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI to detect residual PCa following focal therapy with irreversible electroporation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Seventy-six patients with biopsy-proven localized PCa consented for primary irreversible electroporation between February 2013 and March 2016. Final analysis was performed on 50 patients that received follow-up mpMRI at 6 mo, serial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, and transperineal template-mapping biopsies at 12 mo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Outfield regions of interest (ROI) were reported using PI-RADS version 2. A binary outcome (suspicious vs nonsuspicious) was given for the infield ablation zone. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were calculated for different definitions of significant PCa: (1) Gleason ≥4+3 or Gleason ≥3+3 with a maximum cancer core length ≥6mm, (2) Gleason ≥3+4 or Gleason ≥3+3 with a maximum cancer core length ≥4mm, for outfield and infield ROI. Multivariate linear regression analyses evaluated the additional value of nadir PSA. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of infield ROI was 43%, 86%, 33%, and 90% for definition 1 and 38%, 86%, 33%, and 88% for definition 2, respectively. For outfield ROI this was 33%, 82%, 20%, and 90% for definition 1 and 38%, 86%, 50%, and 80% for definition 2. PSA had no additional value in predicting residual significant PCa. Limitations include retrospective design, single reader, and low incidence of residual PCa. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary data suggest that mpMRI can rule out high-volume residual PCa. However, follow-up biopsies should still be performed to determine oncological control. PATIENT SUMMARY Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect high-volume significant prostate cancer following focal therapy. Prostate biopsies are still required in the follow-up of focal therapy as (low-volume) significant prostate cancer is being missed by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs J Scheltema
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Academic Medical Center, Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - John I Chang
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Willemien van den Bos
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maret Böhm
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Ilan Gielchinsky
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean J de la Rosette
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amila R Siriwardana
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ron Shnier
- Southern Radiology, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee KW, Lee JM, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B, Seo YS, Jeen YT, Um SH, Lee HS, Chun HJ, Kim CD, Oh CH, Kim HB. Novel Ablation Therapy Using Endoscopic Irreversible Electroporation in the Bile Duct: A Pilot Animal Study. Clin Endosc 2020; 54:413-419. [PMID: 33076633 PMCID: PMC8182241 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a relatively new ablation method. However, the application of IRE ablation in the treatment of biliary disease has not been attempted. A minimally invasive approach using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can be a novel therapeutic modality for IRE ablation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of endoscopic IRE for the biliary tract using an animal model.
Methods A new catheter-type electrode was developed for endoscopic IRE ablation of the biliary tract. We performed ERCP and endoscopic IRE ablations in the normal common bile duct of Yorkshire pigs. The experimental setting of IRE was 500 V/cm (50 pulses, 100-µs length). The animals were sacrificed after 24 hr, and the ablated bile duct was examined.
Results Well-demarcated focal color changes were observed on the mucosa of the common bile duct. The depth of change after IRE was confined to the mucosal and submucosal layers. Apoptotic changes in the bile duct were observed only around the IRE ablation area. Immunohistochemistry assay showed cell death in the bile duct along the electrode.
Conclusions Endoscopic IRE ablation using ERCP was successfully performed in the common bile duct. It can be a potential option for the treatment of biliary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang Won Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Min Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyuk Soon Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Sun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bora Keum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon Seok Seo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Tae Jeen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon Ho Um
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Sik Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hoon Jai Chun
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Duck Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chi Hyuk Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Bae Kim
- Department of Biosystems and Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morozov A, Taratkin M, Barret E, Singla N, Bezrukov E, Chinenov D, Enikeev M, Gomez Rivas J, Shpikina A, Enikeev D. A systematic review of irreversible electroporation in localised prostate cancer treatment. Andrologia 2020; 52:e13789. [DOI: 10.1111/and.13789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Morozov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Mark Taratkin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Paris France
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
| | - Evgeniy Bezrukov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Denis Chinenov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Mikhail Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | | | - Anastasia Shpikina
- International School ‘Medicine of the Future’ Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aydin AM, Gage K, Dhillon J, Cheriyan SK, Poch MA, Manley BJ, Li R, Sexton WJ, Spiess PE, Gilbert SM, Pow-Sang JM. Focal bipolar radiofrequency ablation for localized prostate cancer: Safety and feasibility. Int J Urol 2020; 27:882-889. [PMID: 32767444 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and feasibility of focal bipolar radiofrequency ablation in men with localized prostate cancer. METHODS A review of 10 patients treated with a novel bipolar radiofrequency ablation probe integrated in a coil design (Encage; Trod Medical, Bradenton, FL, USA) between 2011 and 2017 in two prospective pilot trials. All men had clinical stage T1c prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen <10 ng/mL and Gleason score ≤7. Ablation was carried out under general anesthesia, and bipolar probes were inserted transperineally under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Treatment-related adverse events, quality of life and negative biopsy rate were evaluated at 6 months after ablation. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare baseline and post-treatment symptom scores. RESULTS The median age was 58 years (range 50-64 years) and the median prostate volume was 49.65 cc (range 21-68 cc). Prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 6 (3 + 3) and 7 (3 + 4) was noted in seven and three patients, respectively. The median number of radiofrequency ablation cycles was 2.5 (range 2-5). All patients were catheter-free and able to void the day of surgery. Within 6 months after ablation, all adverse events were low grade, with the exception of one grade 3 hematuria that required cystoscopy without coagulation. Six months after ablation bowel, urinary and hormonal functions, and overall satisfaction remained stable. Erectile dysfunction occurred in two out of four patients who had normal sexual function before the procedure. Neither urinary incontinence nor urinary infection was noted. CONCLUSIONS This first report on focal bipolar radiofrequency ablation documents a safe and feasible treatment option for selected patients with localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Murat Aydin
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kenneth Gage
- Department of , Department of , Diagnostic Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jasreman Dhillon
- Department of , Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Salim K Cheriyan
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael A Poch
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Brandon J Manley
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Julio M Pow-Sang
- Departments of , Department of , Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Oncological and Quality-of-life Outcomes Following Focal Irreversible Electroporation as Primary Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer: A Biopsy-monitored Prospective Cohort. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:283-290. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
23
|
Westhoff N, Ritter M, Maros M, Rassweiler-Seyfried MC, Michel MS, Honeck P, von Hardenberg J. Prospective Feasibility Study of Single-Shot Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Transrectal Focal Ablation of Prostate Cancer. Urol Int 2020; 104:378-385. [PMID: 32396911 DOI: 10.1159/000507123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urinary tract infections (UTI) represent the most frequent complications after transrectal focal ablation of prostate cancer. Single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention has not yet been described. METHODS In this cohort study of patients who received a high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of prostate cancer within a registered prospective single-arm trial, we analyzed posttreatment UTI (≤30 days after HIFU) related to perioperative antibiotic management in an exploratory analysis: single-shot prophylaxis or targeted treatment for bacteriuria. Potential risk factors associated with UTI were evaluated by uni- and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS In total, 55 patients were eligible for analysis. Of these, 76.4% received antibiotic single-shot prophylaxis. UTI occurred in 10.7% of all patients, 5.4% developed fever, 3.6% required hospitalization. An antibiotic single-shot prophylaxis helped to protect 90.5% of men from infectious complications. Estimated effects indicate that a longer posttreatment catheterization (OR 3.38, 95% CI 0.47-27.08) and larger ablation volume (OR 4.85, 95% CI 0.61-107.49) might be associated with the highest risk for UTI after treatment. CONCLUSION Single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis compared to a targeted antibiotic treatment showed a similar effectivity to prevent patients from infectious complications and should be considered as an element of antibiotic stewardship. Further research on risk factors and antibiotic strategies is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Westhoff
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany,
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Máté Maros
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maurice-Stephan Michel
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Honeck
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jost von Hardenberg
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guenther E, Klein N, Mikus P, Botea F, Pautov M, Lugnani F, Macchioro M, Popescu I, Stehling MK, Rubinsky B. Toward a clinical real time tissue ablation technology: combining electroporation and electrolysis (E2). PeerJ 2020; 8:e7985. [PMID: 31998549 PMCID: PMC6977482 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Percutaneous image-guided tissue ablation (IGA) plays a growing role in the clinical management of solid malignancies. Electroporation is used for IGA in several modalities: irreversible electroporation (IRE), and reversible electroporation with chemotoxic drugs, called electrochemotherapy (ECT). It was shown that the combination of electrolysis and electroporation—E2—affords tissue ablation with greater efficiency, that is, lower voltages, lower energy and shorter procedure times than IRE and without the need for chemotoxic additives as in ECT. Methods A new E2 waveform was designed that delivers optimal doses of electroporation and electrolysis in a single waveform. A series of experiments were performed in the liver of pigs to evaluate E2 in the context of clinical applications. The goal was to find initial parameter boundaries in terms of electrical field, pulse duration and charge as well as tissue behavior to enable real time tissue ablation of clinically relevant volumes. Results Histological results show that a single several hundred millisecond long E2 waveform can ablate large volume of tissue at relatively low voltages while preserving the integrity of large blood vessels and lumen structures in the ablation zone without the use of chemotoxic drugs or paralyzing drugs during anesthesia. This could translate clinically into much shorter treatment times and ease of use compared to other techniques that are currently applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enric Guenther
- Biophysics, Inter Science GmbH, Gisikon, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Bioengineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.,Institut fur Bildgebende Diagnostik, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Nina Klein
- Biophysics, Inter Science GmbH, Gisikon, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Institut fur Bildgebende Diagnostik, Offenbach, Germany.,Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul Mikus
- Biophysics, Inter Science GmbH, Gisikon, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Florin Botea
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Center of Translational Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihail Pautov
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Center of Translational Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Irinel Popescu
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Center of Translational Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Michael K Stehling
- Biophysics, Inter Science GmbH, Gisikon, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Bioengineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.,Institut fur Bildgebende Diagnostik, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Boris Rubinsky
- Biophysics, Inter Science GmbH, Gisikon, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Bioengineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Aycock KN, Davalos RV. Irreversible Electroporation: Background, Theory, and Review of Recent Developments in Clinical Oncology. Bioelectricity 2019; 1:214-234. [PMID: 34471825 PMCID: PMC8370296 DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2019.0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) has established a clinical niche as an alternative to thermal ablation for the eradication of unresectable tumors, particularly those near critical vascular structures. IRE has been used in over 50 independent clinical trials and has shown clinical success when used as a standalone treatment and as a single component within combinatorial treatment paradigms. Recently, many studies evaluating IRE in larger patient cohorts and alongside other novel therapies have been reported. Here, we present the basic principles of reversible electroporation and IRE followed by a review of preclinical and clinical data with a focus on tumors in three organ systems in which IRE has shown great promise: the prostate, pancreas, and liver. Finally, we discuss alternative and future developments, which will likely further advance the use of IRE in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth N Aycock
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University, Blacksburg, Virginia
| | - Rafael V Davalos
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University, Blacksburg, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Blazevski A, Scheltema MJ, Amin A, Thompson JE, Lawrentschuk N, Stricker PD. Irreversible electroporation (IRE): a narrative review of the development of IRE from the laboratory to a prostate cancer treatment. BJU Int 2019; 125:369-378. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandar Blazevski
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School; University of New South Wales; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Matthijs J. Scheltema
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- Department of Urology; Amsterdam UMC; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Amer Amin
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
| | - James E. Thompson
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School; University of New South Wales; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth Healthcare; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Surgery; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre; Austin Hospital; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Phillip D. Stricker
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School; University of New South Wales; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Examine and discuss novel focal therapy treatment options for prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS With the widespread adoption of mpMRI-guided biopsies for prostate cancer, use of image-guided treatment of prostate cancer has increased. Focal therapies leading to partial gland ablation such as partial prostatectomy, focal laser ablation, irreversible electroporation, vascular targeted photodynamic therapy, and focal radiofrequency ablation have emerged and begun to be properly evaluated. This review covers published phase 1 and 2 trials of each treatment and discusses potential limitations of each modality. SUMMARY Focal therapy of prostate cancer is being actively investigated. On the basis of limited published data, the treatments appear to be well tolerated and have an acceptable side effect profile. Importantly, short-term oncologic control has been mixed and there are no long-term outcomes. The acquisition of more data is essential to evaluate these novel technology platforms.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate focal therapy has the potential to preserve urinary and sexual function while eliminating clinically significant cancer in a subset of men with low-volume, organ-confined prostate cancer. This systematic review aims to examine current evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of focal therapy for standard clinical application. RECENT FINDINGS Focal therapy reduces the rate of cancer progression and conversion to radical therapy in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. As a strategy, success in focal therapy is heavily dependent on the use of imaging and targeted biopsies. Despite advances in these areas, there remains a small but significant risk of under-detecting clinically significant cancer. Similarly, under-estimation of tumor volume may contribute to infield recurrences and close attention must be paid to the ablation margin. Although long-term oncological outcomes remain lacking, focal therapy has a low complication rate, minimal impact on urinary continence and a moderate impact on erectile function. SUMMARY With the appropriate expertise in imaging, targeted biopsy and targeted ablation, focal therapy is a good option in men with low-intermediate risk cancer who are willing to maximize their urinary and sexual function. However, close posttreatment surveillance and the possibility of conversion to whole gland therapy must be accepted.
Collapse
|
30
|
Collettini F, Enders J, Stephan C, Fischer T, Baur ADJ, Penzkofer T, Busch J, Hamm B, Gebauer B. Image-guided Irreversible Electroporation of Localized Prostate Cancer: Functional and Oncologic Outcomes. Radiology 2019; 292:250-257. [PMID: 31161973 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablative method based on the formation of nanoscale defects in cell membranes leading to cell death. Clinical experience with the technique for treatment of prostate cancer remains limited. Purpose To evaluate urogenital toxicity and oncologic outcome of MRI-transrectal US fusion-guided IRE of localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, men with biopsy-proven, treatment-naive, low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen [PSA], ≤15 ng/mL; Gleason score, ≤3 + 4; clinical stage, ≤T2c; lesion size at multiparametric MRI, ≤20 mm) underwent focal MRI/transrectal US fusion-guided IRE between July 2014 and July 2017. Primary end point was the urogenital toxicity profile of focal IRE by using participant-reported questionnaires. Secondary end points were biochemical, histologic, and imaging measures of oncologic control. Analyses were performed by using nonparametric and χ2 test statistics. Results Thirty men were included (median age, 65.5 years); mean PSA level was 8.65 ng/mL and mean tumor size was 13.5 mm. One grade III adverse event (urethral stricture) was recorded. The proportion of men with erection sufficient for penetration was 83.3% (25 of 30) at baseline and 79.3% (23 of 29; P > .99) at 12 months. Leak-free and pad-free continence rate was 90% (27 of 30) at baseline and 86.2% (25 of 29; P > .99) at 12 months. Urogenital function remained stable at 12 months according to changes in the modified International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, or ICIQ-MLUTS, and the International Index of Erectile Function, or IIEF-5, questionnaires (P = .58 and P = .07, respectively). PSA level decreased from a baseline median value of 8.65 ng/mL (interquartile range, 5-11.4 ng/mL) to 2.35 ng/mL (interquartile range, 1-3.4 ng/mL) at 12 months (P < .001). At 6 months, 28 of 30 participants underwent posttreatment biopsy. The rate of in-field treatment failure was 17.9% (five of 28) as determined with multiparametric prostate MRI and targeted biopsies at 6 months. Conclusion After a median follow-up of 20 months, focal irreversible electroporation of localized prostate cancer was associated with low urogenital toxicity and promising oncologic outcomes. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Collettini
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Judith Enders
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Carsten Stephan
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Thomas Fischer
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Alexander D J Baur
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Tobias Penzkofer
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Jonas Busch
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Bernd Hamm
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Scheltema MJ, Chang JI, van den Bos W, Gielchinsky I, Nguyen TV, Reijke TDM, Siriwardana AR, Böhm M, de la Rosette JJ, Stricker PD. Impact on genitourinary function and quality of life following focal irreversible electroporation of different prostate segments. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 24:268-275. [PMID: 30211680 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2018.17374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the genitourinary function and quality of life (QoL) following the ablation of different prostate segments with irreversible electroporation (IRE) for localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Sixty patients who received primary focal IRE for organ-confined PCa were recruited for this study. Patients were evaluated for genitourinary function and QoL per prostate segment treated (anterior vs. posterior, apex vs. base vs. apex-to-base, unilateral vs. bilateral). IRE system settings and patient characteristics were compared between patients with preserved vs. those with impaired erectile function and urinary continence. Data were prospectively collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months using the expanded prostate cancer index composite, American Urological Association symptom score, SF-12 physical and mental component summary surveys. Difference over time within segments per questionnaire was evaluated using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Outcome differences between segments were assessed using covariance models. Baseline measurements included questionnaire scores, age, and prostate volume. RESULTS There were no statistically significant changes over time for overall urinary (P = 0.07-0.89), bowel (P = 0.06-0.79), physical (P = 0.18-0.71) and mental (P = 0.45-0.94) QoL scores within each segment. Deterioration of sexual function scores was observed at 6 months within each segment (P = 0.001-0.16). There were no statistically significant differences in QoL scores between prostate segments (P = 0.08-0.97). Older patients or those with poor baseline sexual function at time of treatment were associated with a greater risk of developing erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSION IRE is a feasible modality for all prostate segments without any significantly different effect on the QoL outcomes. Older patients and those with poor sexual function need to be counseled regarding the risk of erectile dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs J Scheltema
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John I Chang
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst; St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Willemien van den Bos
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst., St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Ilan Gielchinsky
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia, St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Tuan V Nguyen
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia,. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Amila R Siriwardana
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maret Böhm
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jean J de la Rosette
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Urology, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Scheltema MJ, O’Brien TJ, van den Bos W, de Bruin DM, Davalos RV, van den Geld CW, Laguna MP, Neal RE, Varkarakis IM, Skolarikos A, Stricker PD, de Reijke TM, Arena CB, de la Rosette J. Numerical simulation modeling of the irreversible electroporation treatment zone for focal therapy of prostate cancer, correlation with whole-mount pathology and T2-weighted MRI sequences. Ther Adv Urol 2019; 11:1756287219852305. [PMID: 31217820 PMCID: PMC6557022 DOI: 10.1177/1756287219852305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, it is not possible to predict the ablation zone volume following irreversible electroporation (IRE) for prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to determine the necessary electrical field threshold to ablate human prostate tissue in vivo with IRE. METHODS In this prospective multicenter trial, patients with localized PCa were treated with IRE 4 weeks before their scheduled radical prostatectomy. In 13 patients, numerical models of the electrical field were generated and compared with the ablation zone volume on whole-mount pathology and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Volume-generating software was used to calculate the ablation zone volumes on histology and MRI. The electric field threshold to ablate prostate tissue was determined for each patient. RESULTS A total of 13 patients were included for histological and simulation analysis. The median electrical field threshold was 550 V/cm (interquartile range 383-750 V/cm) for the software-generated histology volumes. The median electrical field threshold was 500 V/cm (interquartile range 386-580 V/cm) when the ablation zone volumes were used from the follow-up MRI. CONCLUSIONS The electrical field threshold to ablate human prostate tissue in vivo was determined using whole-mount pathology and MRI. These thresholds may be used to develop treatment planning or monitoring software for IRE prostate ablation; however, further optimization of simulation methods are required to decrease the variance that was observed between patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs J. Scheltema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Room G4-249, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Tim J. O’Brien
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | | | - Daniel M. de Bruin
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rafael V. Davalos
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Cees W.M. van den Geld
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Maria P. Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert E. Neal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Ioannis M. Varkarakis
- Second Urology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Andreas Skolarikos
- Second Urology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Phillip D. Stricker
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Christopher B. Arena
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To present a perspective on the current status and future directions of focal therapy for prostate cancer (PCa). RECENT FINDINGS Focal therapy for localized PCa is a rapidly evolving field. Various recent concepts - the index lesion driving prognosis, the enhanced detection of clinically significant PCa using multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsy, improved risk-stratification using novel blood/tissue biomarkers, the recognition that reducing radical treatment-related morbidity (along with reducing pathologic progression) is a clinically meaningful end-point - have all led to a growing interest in focal therapy. Novel focal therapy modalities are being investigated, mostly in phase 1 and 2 studies. Recently, level I prospective randomized data comparing partial gland ablation with a standard-of-care treatment became available from one study. Recent developments in imaging, including 7-T MRI, functional imaging, radiomics and contrast-enhanced ultrasound show early promise. We also discuss emerging concepts in patient selection for focal therapy. SUMMARY PCa focal therapy has evolved considerably in the recent few years. Overall, these novel focal therapy treatments demonstrate safety and feasibility, low treatment-related toxicity and acceptable short-term and in some cases medium-term oncologic outcomes. As imaging techniques evolve, patient selection, detection of clinically significant PCa and noninvasive assessment of therapeutic efficacy will be further optimized. The aspirational goal of achieving oncologic control while reducing radical treatment-related morbidity will drive further innovation in the field.
Collapse
|
34
|
Calio B, Kasson M, Sugano D, Ortman M, Gaitonde K, Verma S, Sidana A. Multiparametric MRI: An Opportunity for Focal Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Semin Roentgenol 2018; 53:227-233. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2018.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
35
|
Bonekamp D, Wolf MB, Roethke MC, Pahernik S, Hadaschik BA, Hatiboglu G, Kuru TH, Popeneciu IV, Chin JL, Billia M, Relle J, Hafron J, Nandalur KR, Staruch RM, Burtnyk M, Hohenfellner M, Schlemmer HP. Twelve-month prostate volume reduction after MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of the prostate. Eur Radiol 2018; 29:299-308. [PMID: 29943185 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5584-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantitatively assess 12-month prostate volume (PV) reduction based on T2-weighted MRI and immediate post-treatment contrast-enhanced MRI non-perfused volume (NPV), and to compare measurements with predictions of acute and delayed ablation volumes based on MR-thermometry (MR-t), in a central radiology review of the Phase I clinical trial of MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) in patients with localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment day MRI and 12-month follow-up MRI and biopsy were available for central radiology review in 29 of 30 patients from the published institutional review board-approved, prospective, multi-centre, single-arm Phase I clinical trial of TULSA. Viable PV at 12 months was measured as the remaining PV on T2-weighted MRI, less 12-month NPV, scaled by the fraction of fibrosis in 12-month biopsy cores. Reduction of viable PV was compared to predictions based on the fraction of the prostate covered by the MR-t derived acute thermal ablation volume (ATAV, 55°C isotherm), delayed thermal ablation volume (DTAV, 240 cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C thermal dose isocontour) and treatment-day NPV. We also report linear and volumetric comparisons between metrics. RESULTS After TULSA, the median 12-month reduction in viable PV was 88%. DTAV predicted a reduction of 90%. Treatment day NPV predicted only 53% volume reduction, and underestimated ATAV and DTAV by 36% and 51%. CONCLUSION Quantitative volumetry of the TULSA phase I MR and biopsy data identifies DTAV (240 CEM43 thermal dose boundary) as a useful predictor of viable prostate tissue reduction at 12 months. Immediate post-treatment NPV underestimates tissue ablation. KEY POINTS • MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) achieved an 88% reduction of viable prostate tissue volume at 12 months, in excellent agreement with expectation from thermal dose calculations. • Non-perfused volume on immediate post-treatment contrast-enhanced MRI represents only 64% of the acute thermal ablation volume (ATAV), and reports only 60% (53% instead of 88% achieved) of the reduction in viable prostate tissue volume at 12 months. • MR-thermometry-based predictions of 12-month prostate volume reduction based on 240 cumulative equivalent minute thermal dose volume are in excellent agreement with reduction in viable prostate tissue volume measured on pre- and 12-month post-treatment T2w-MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bonekamp
- Department of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - M B Wolf
- Department of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M C Roethke
- Department of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Pahernik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B A Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Hatiboglu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T H Kuru
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - I V Popeneciu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J L Chin
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario (UWO), London Health Sciences Center, Victoria Hospital, London, ON, Canada
| | - M Billia
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario (UWO), London Health Sciences Center, Victoria Hospital, London, ON, Canada
| | - J Relle
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - J Hafron
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - K R Nandalur
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - R M Staruch
- Clinical Science, Profound Medical Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Burtnyk
- Clinical Science, Profound Medical Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H-P Schlemmer
- Department of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bloom JB, Gold SA, Hale GR, Rayn KN, Sabarwal VK, Bakhutashvili I, Valera V, Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Wood BJ. "Super-active surveillance": MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy and ablation for less invasive management of prostate cancer. Gland Surg 2018; 7:166-187. [PMID: 29770311 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.03.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has allowed clinicians to better visualize and target suspicious lesions during biopsy. Targeted prostate biopsies give a more accurate representation of the true cancer volume and stage so that appropriate treatment or active surveillance can be selected. Advances in technology have led to the development of MRI and ultrasound fusion platforms used for targeted biopsies, monitoring cancer progression, and more recently for the application of focal therapy. Lesions visualized on mpMRI can be targeted for ablation with a variety of energy sources employed under both local and general anesthesia. Focal ablation may offer an alternative option for treating prostate cancer as compared to the well-established interventions of whole-gland radiation or prostatectomy. Focal ablation may also be an option for patients on active surveillance who wish to be even more "active" in their surveillance. In this review, we describe the advancements and development of fusion biopsies, the rationale behind focal therapy, and introduce focal ablative techniques for indolent prostate cancers ("super-active surveillance"), including cryoablation and focal laser ablation (FLA) and the subsequent MRI/biopsy surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan B Bloom
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Samuel A Gold
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Graham R Hale
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kareem N Rayn
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Vikram K Sabarwal
- Department of Urology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ivane Bakhutashvili
- Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Vladimir Valera
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Scheltema MJ, Postema AW, de Bruin DM, Buijs M, Engelbrecht MR, Laguna MP, Wijkstra H, de Reijke TM, de la Rosette JJMCH. Irreversible electroporation for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a summary of imaging findings and treatment feedback. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018; 23:365-370. [PMID: 28830850 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2017.16608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Imaging plays a crucial role in ablative therapies for prostate cancer (PCa). Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new treatment modality used for focal treatment of PCa. We aimed to demonstrate what imaging modalities can be used by descriptively reporting contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) results. Furthermore, we aimed to correlate quantitatively the ablation zone seen on mpMRI and CEUS with treatment planning to provide therapy feedback. METHODS Imaging data was obtained from two prospective multicenter trials on IRE for localized low- to intermediate-risk PCa. The ablation zone volume (AZV) seen on mpMRI and CEUS was 3D reconstructed to correlate with the planned AZV. RESULTS Descriptive examples are provided using mpMRI, TRUS, and CEUS for treatment planning and follow-up after IRE. The mean AZV on T2-weighted imaging 4 weeks following IRE was 12.9 cm3 (standard deviation [SD]=7.0), 5.3 times larger than the planned AZV. Linear regression showed a positive correlation (r=0.76, P = 0.002). For CEUS the mean AZV was 20.7 cm3 (SD=8.7), 8.5 times larger than the planned AZV with a strong positive correlation (r=0.93, P = 0.001). Prostate volume is reduced over time (mean= -27.5%, SD=11.9%) due to ablation zone fibrosis and deformation, illustrated by 3D reconstruction. CONCLUSION The role of imaging in conjunction with IRE is of crucial importance to guide clinicians throughout the treatment protocol. CEUS and mpMRI may provide essential treatment feedback by visualizing the ablation zone dimensions and volume.
Collapse
|
38
|
Murray KS, Akin O, Coleman JA. Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Cancer as Salvage Treatment Following Prior Radiation and Cryotherapy. Rev Urol 2018; 19:268-272. [PMID: 29472832 DOI: 10.3909/riu0755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Salvage treatment options after localized primary treatment failure of prostate cancer are limited and associated with risk for serious complications. We report on the management details of a 57-year-old African American man treated with partial-gland ablation using irreversible electroporation following local recurrence after brachytherapy and prior salvage cryoablation. Therapeutic and functional outcomes were assessed by conventional means, including serum prostate-specific antigen values and prostate biopsy results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie S Murray
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri Columbia, MO
| | - Oguz Akin
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Faure Walker NA, Norris JM, Shah TT, Yap T, Cathcart P, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Minhas S. A comparison of time taken to return to baseline erectile function following focal and whole gland ablative therapies for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review. Urol Oncol 2017; 36:67-76. [PMID: 29277585 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Revised: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review erectile function (EF) outcomes following primary whole gland (WG) and focal ablative therapies for localized prostate cancer to ascertain whether the treatment modality or intended treatment volume affects the time taken to recover baseline EF. METHOD AND MATERIALS A systematic review was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis statement. Inclusion criteria were men with localized prostate cancer treated with primary, ablative therapy. Primary outcome was the return to baseline EF measured with objective, validated symptoms scores. Secondary outcome was use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors or erectile aids. Meta-analysis was not performed owing to heterogenous outcome measures. RESULTS Of 222 articles identified in February 2017, 55 studies which reported EF after ablative therapy were identified but only 17 used validated outcome measures and met inclusion criteria. WG cryotherapy was used in 2 studies, WG high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in 5, focal cryotherapy in 2, focal HIFU in 3, focal phototherapy or laser therapy in 4, vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy in 3, and irreversible electroporation in 2. WG cryotherapy was associated with a significant decline in EF at 6 months with minimal improvement at 36 months. Baseline IIEF-15 of patients undergoing focal HIFU fell 30 points at 1 month but returned to baseline by 6 months. The remaining focal therapies demonstrated minimal or no effect on EF, but the men in these studies had small foci of disease. The review is limited by lack of randomized studies and heterogenous outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Most studies assessing the outcomes of focal therapy on sexual function were not of high quality, used heterogenous outcomes, and had relatively short follow up, highlighting the need for more robustly designed studies using validated patient reported outcome measures for comparison. However, FT in general resulted in less effect on EF than WG ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph M Norris
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, Whittington Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tet Yap
- Department of Urology, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Cathcart
- Department of Urology, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK; Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Suks Minhas
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hsiao CY, Huang KW. Irreversible Electroporation: A Novel Ultrasound-guided Modality for Non-thermal Tumor Ablation. J Med Ultrasound 2017; 25:195-200. [PMID: 30065492 PMCID: PMC6029329 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmu.2017.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided tumor ablation techniques have been proven to be highly effective and minimally invasive in the treatment of many diseases. Traditional approaches to ablation include microwave and radiofrequency techniques, cryotherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. However, these methods are prone to heat-sink effects that can diminish the effectiveness of treatment and damage adjacent structures, such as bile ducts, blood vessels, the gallbladder, or bowel. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal ablation modality that induces cell apoptosis through the application of high-voltage current. IRE is not limited by many of the limitation which affects conventional tumor ablation techniques, and is particularly useful in treating sensitive areas of the body. The article reviews the basics of ultrasound-guided technology, including its clinical applications and effectiveness in the treatment of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Yang Hsiao
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Wen Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Hepatitis Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Renard-Penna R, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Cosset JM, de Vergie S, Sapetti J, Ingels A, Gangi A, Lang H, Cathelineau X. [Evaluation and results of ablative therapies in prostate cancer]. Prog Urol 2017; 27:887-908. [PMID: 28939336 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a state of the art about methods of evaluation and present results in ablative therapies for localized prostate cancer. METHODS A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of keywords. Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. After selection, 102 articles were analysed. RESULTS Analyse the results of ablative therapies is presently difficult considering the heterogeneity of indications, techniques and follow-up. However, results from the most recent and homogeneous studies are encouraging. Oncologically, postoperative biopsies (the most important criteria) are negative (without any tumor cells in the treated area) in 75 to 95%. Functionally, urinary and sexual pre-operative status is spared (or recovered early) in more than 90% of the patients treated. More and more studies underline also the correlation between the results and the technique used considering the volume of the gland and, moreover, the "index lesion" localization. CONCLUSION The post-treatment pathological evaluation by biopsies (targeted with MRI or, perhaps in a near future, with innovative ultrasonography) is the corner stone of oncological evaluation of ablative therapies. Ongoing trials will allow to standardize the follow-up and determine the best indication and the best techniques in order to optimize oncological and functional results for each patient treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Renard-Penna
- Service d'imagerie, hôpitaux Tenon-Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, UPMC université Paris VI, 75013 Paris, France
| | - R Sanchez-Salas
- Département d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - E Barret
- Département d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - J M Cosset
- Département d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - S de Vergie
- Département d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - J Sapetti
- Département d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - A Ingels
- Département d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - A Gangi
- Service de radiologie interventionnelle, CHU de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - H Lang
- Service de chirurgie urologique, CHU de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - X Cathelineau
- Département d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Scheltema MJ, van den Bos W, Siriwardana AR, Kalsbeek AM, Thompson JE, Ting F, Böhm M, Haynes AM, Shnier R, Delprado W, Stricker PD. Feasibility and safety of focal irreversible electroporation as salvage treatment for localized radio-recurrent prostate cancer. BJU Int 2017; 120 Suppl 3:51-58. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs J. Scheltema
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
- St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
- Academic Medical Centre; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Willemien van den Bos
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
- St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
- Academic Medical Centre; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Amila R. Siriwardana
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
- St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
| | - Anton M.F. Kalsbeek
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
| | | | - Francis Ting
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
- St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
| | - Maret Böhm
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
| | - Anne-Maree Haynes
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre; Darlinghurst NSW Australia
| | - Ron Shnier
- Southern Radiology; Randwick NSW Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
van den Bos W, Scheltema MJ, Siriwardana AR, Kalsbeek AMF, Thompson JE, Ting F, Böhm M, Haynes AM, Shnier R, Delprado W, Stricker PD. Focal irreversible electroporation as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2017; 121:716-724. [PMID: 28796935 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the safety, quality of life (QoL) and short-term oncological outcomes of primary focal irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa), and to identify potential risk factors for oncological failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who met the consensus guidelines on patient criteria and selection methods for primary focal therapy were eligible for analysis. Focal IRE was performed for organ-confined clinically significant PCa, defined as high-volume disease with Gleason sum score 6 (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade 1) or any Gleason sum score of 7 (ISUP grades 2-3). Oncological, adverse event (AE) and QoL outcome data, with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up, were analysed. Patient characteristics and peri-operative treatment variables were compared between patients with and without oncological failure on follow-up biopsy. Wilcoxon's signed rank test, Wilcoxon's rank sum test and the chi-squared test were used to assess statistically significant differences in paired continuous, unpaired continuous and categorical variables respectively. RESULTS A total of 63 patients met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. No high-grade AEs occurred. QoL questionnaire analysis demonstrated no significant change from baseline in physical (P = 0.81), mental (P = 0.48), bowel (P = 0.25) or urinary QoL domains (P = 0.41 and P = 0.25), but there was a mild decrease in the sexual QoL domain (median score 66 at baseline vs 54 at 6 months; P < 0.001). Compared with baseline, a decline of 70% in prostate-specific antigen level (1.8 ng/mL, interquartile range 0.96-4.8 ng/mL) was seen at 6-12 months. A narrow safety margin (P = 0.047) and system errors (P = 0.010) were identified as potential early risk factors for in-field oncological failure. In-field and whole-gland oncological control on follow-up biopsies was 84% (38/45 patients) and 76% (34/45 patients); this increased to 97% (38/39 patients) and 87% (34/39 patients) when patients treated with a narrow safety margin and system errors were excluded. CONCLUSION Our data support the safety and feasibility of focal IRE as a primary treatment for localized PCa with effective short-term oncological control in carefully selected men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemien van den Bos
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre.,St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs J Scheltema
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre.,St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amila R Siriwardana
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre.,St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | | | - James E Thompson
- St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Francis Ting
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre.,St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Maret Böhm
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre
| | | | | | - Warick Delprado
- Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tay KJ, Schulman AA, Sze C, Tsivian E, Polascik TJ. New advances in focal therapy for early stage prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017. [PMID: 28635336 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1345630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate focal therapy offers men the opportunity to achieve oncological control while preserving sexual and urinary function. The prerequisites for successful focal therapy are to accurately identify, localize and completely ablate the clinically significant cancer(s) within the prostate. We aim to evaluate the evidence for current and upcoming technologies that could shape the future of prostate cancer focal therapy in the next five years. Areas covered: Current literature on advances in patient selection using imaging, biopsy and biomarkers, ablation techniques and adjuvant treatments for focal therapy are summarized. A literature search of major databases was performed using the search terms 'focal therapy', 'focal ablation', 'partial ablation', 'targeted ablation', 'image guided therapy' and 'prostate cancer'. Expert commentary: Advanced radiological tools such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS), prostate-specific-membrane-antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) represent a revolution in the ability to understand cancer function and biology. Advances in ablative technologies now provide a menu of modalities that can be rationalized based on lesion location, size and perhaps in the near future, pre-determined resistance to therapy. However, these need to be carefully studied to establish their safety and efficacy parameters. Adjuvant strategies to enhance focal ablation are under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kae Jack Tay
- a Department of Urology , Singapore General Hospital, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center , Singapore.,b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Ariel A Schulman
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Christina Sze
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Efrat Tsivian
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Labarbera N. Uncertainty Quantification in Irreversible Electroporation Simulations. Bioengineering (Basel) 2017; 4:bioengineering4020041. [PMID: 28952520 PMCID: PMC5590475 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering4020041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Revised: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
One recent area of cancer research is irreversible electroporation (IRE). Irreversible electroporation is a minimally invasive procedure where needle electrodes are inserted into the body to ablate tumor cells with electricity. The aim of this paper is to investigate how uncertainty in tissue and tumor conductivity propagate into final ablation predictions used for treatment planning. Two dimensional simulations were performed for a circular tumor surrounded by healthy tissue, and electroporated from two monopolar electrodes. The conductivity values were treated as random variables whose distributions were taken from published literature on the average and standard deviation of liver tissue and liver tumors. Three different Monte Carlo setups were simulated each at three different voltages. Average and standard deviation data was reported for a multitude of electrical field properties experienced by the tumor. Plots showing the variability in the electrical field distribution throughout the tumor are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Labarbera
- Engineering Science & Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Normal Porcine Ureter Retains Lumen Wall Integrity but Not Patency Following Catheter-Directed Irreversible Electroporation: Imaging and Histologic Assessment over 28 Days. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28:913-919.e1. [PMID: 28366657 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 02/19/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of catheter-directed irreversible electroporation (IRE) on the integrity, patency, and function of the normal porcine ureter. MATERIALS AND METHODS A catheter-mounted electrode was used to perform fluoroscopy-guided IRE in 8 healthy pigs. Two unilateral ablations (90 pulses at 2,000 V, 100 μs) were performed in each animal in the proximal and distal ureter. Serum creatinine measurements and contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging were performed at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after IRE, and findings were compared with baseline values by Student t test. Two animals each were euthanized at 1, 7, 14, and 28 days after IRE for histologic assessment of treatment effects. Quantitative histologic analysis of regeneration and healing of the ureteral wall was graded on a five-point scale. RESULTS IRE was successfully performed in all animals. Preservation of ureteral wall integrity was confirmed by the leakage-free passage of contrast medium in the treated ureter of all animals through the observation period. Ureteral strictures and associated renal pelvicaliceal dilation were observed in all animals by study days 7 (P = .005) and 14 (P = .007) and did not resolve by day 28. Urothelial recovery was observed in tissue samples from day 7, with progressive replacement of the tunica muscularis with granulation tissue. Despite extensive scarring of the tunica muscularis, full recovery of the urothelium was observed by day 28. CONCLUSIONS The normal porcine ureter retains lumen wall integrity and function following catheter-directed IRE. Scarring of the tunica muscularis in the treated ureter results in stricture formation and reduction of lumen patency.
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Valerio M, Dickinson L, Ali A, Ramachadran N, Donaldson I, Mccartan N, Freeman A, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. Nanoknife Electroporation Ablation Trial: A Prospective Development Study Investigating Focal Irreversible Electroporation for Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2016; 197:647-654. [PMID: 27697580 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Irreversible electroporation has attractive attributes for focal ablation, namely nonthermal effect, precise demarcation of treatment and tissue selectivity. We report a prospective development study investigating focal irreversible electroporation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 20 men with certain characteristics were recruited for study, including a visible index lesion on anterior magnetic resonance imaging that was concordant with transperineal targeted and template prostate mapping biopsy, absent clinically significant disease noted elsewhere (University College London definition 2) and prostate specific antigen 15 ng/ml or less. Our primary objective was to determine the side effect profile at 12 months. Secondary objectives included the domain specific toxicity profile using patient reported outcomes and early disease control using magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy. RESULTS A total of 19 patients with median age of 60 years (IQR 53-66) and median prostate specific antigen 7.75 ng/ml (IQR 5.5-10.03) were treated. Of the patients 16 were available for estimating the first outcome as 1 was lost to followup and 2 had received another form of treatment by study end. All 16 men had pad-free/leak-free continence at 12 months. The proportion of men with erection sufficient for penetration decreased from 12 of 16 (75%) to 11 of 16 (69%). No serious adverse events were recorded. There was a statistically significant improvement in urinary symptoms according to changes in UCLA-EPIC (UCLA Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) and I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) (p = 0.039 and 0.001, respectively). Erectile function remained stable according to the change in IIEF-15 (15-Item International Index of Erectile Function) (p = 0.572). Median prostate specific antigen significantly decreased to 1.71 ng/ml (p = 0.001). One man refused followup biopsy. No residual disease was found in 11 patients (61.1%). One man (5.6%) harbored clinically insignificant disease and the remaining 6 (33.3%) harbored clinically significant disease. CONCLUSIONS Focal irreversible electroporation has low genitourinary toxicity. Additional studies are needed to optimize patient selection and treatment parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Valerio
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Louise Dickinson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Afia Ali
- Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Navin Ramachadran
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Donaldson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Mccartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|