R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort

Hospital volume-outcome relationships for robot-assisted surgeries: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Associations between procedure volumes and outcomes can inform minimum volume standards and the regionalization of health services. Robot-assisted surgery continues to expand globally; however, data are limited regarding which hospitals should be using the technology.

STUDY DESIGN

Using administrative health data for all residents of Ontario, Canada, this retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), total robotic hysterectomy (TRH), robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), or robotic portal lobectomy using 4 arms (RPL-4) between January 2010 and September 2021. Associations between yearly hospital volumes and 90-day major complications were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for patient characteristics and clustering at the level of the hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 10,879 patients were included, with 7567, 1776, 724, and 812 undergoing a RARP, TRH, RAPN, and RPL-4, respectively. Yearly hospital volume was not associated with 90-day complications for any procedure. Doubling of yearly volume was associated with a 17-min decrease in operative time for RARP (95% confidence interval [CI] - 23 to - 10), 8-min decrease for RAPN (95% CI - 14 to - 2), 24-min decrease for RPL-4 (95% CI - 29 to - 19), and no significant change for TRH (- 7 min; 95% CI - 17 to 3).

CONCLUSION

The risk of 90-day major complications does not appear to be higher in low volume hospitals; however, they may not be as efficient with operating room utilization. Careful case selection may have contributed to the lack of an observed association between volumes and complications.

Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR 43-Robese study)

INTRODUCTION

There is limited evidence on the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). In this study, we aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of RPN and OPN.

METHODS

We relied on data from patients who underwent PN from 2009 to 2017 at 16 departments of urology participating in the UroCCR network, which were collected prospectively. In an effort to adjust for potential confounders, a propensity-score matching was performed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between OPN and RPN patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Overall, 1277 obese patients (932 robotic and 345 open were included. After propensity score matching, 166 OPN and 166 RPN individuals were considered for the study purposes; no statistically significant difference among baseline demographic or tumor-specific characteristics was present. A higher overall complication rate and major complications rate were recorded in the OPN group (37 vs. 25%, p = 0.01 and 21 vs. 10%, p = 0.007; respectively). The length of stay was also significantly longer in the OPN group, before and after propensity-score matching (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in Warm ischemia time (p = 0.66), absolute change in eGFR (p = 0.45) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.12). At a median postoperative follow-up period of 24 (8-40) months, DFS and OS were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, RPN was associated with better perioperative outcomes (improvement of major complications rate and LOS) than OPN. The oncological outcomes were found to be similar between the two approaches.

Associations between R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and survival outcomes in renal tumours

OBJECTIVE

The radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score could be used to predict surgical outcomes and renal tumour aggressiveness. We aimed to analyse its associations with survival outcomes.

METHODS

We included 1368 patients with sporadic, unilateral and non-metastatic renal tumours who received curative nephrectomy in Zhongshan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2019. Radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores were assigned by three urologists based on preoperative CT/MRI scans. Correlations between parameters or sum of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were analysed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and the multivariate Cox regression model. We further compared survival outcomes between patients who received partial nephrectomy and patients who received radical nephrectomy.

RESULTS

We observed statistically significant associations between all components of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores and oncologic outcomes, including R (radius) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival , P < 0.001), E (exophytic/endophytic) (overall survival, P = 0.003; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), N (nearness) (overall survival, P = 0.063; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), A (anterior/posterior) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.005), L (location) (overall survival, P = 0.008; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001) and suffix 'h' (overall survival, P = 0.237; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.034). Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were significantly different when stratified by radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score complexity group (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001). After adjusting for tumour stage and grade, radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score as continuous variables was an adverse independent risk factor for survival outcomes [P = 0.027, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.151 (1.016-1.303)] and recurrence-free survival [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.299 (1.125-1.501)]. For tumours with radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores of 4 and 5, partial nephrectomy showed a survival benefit than radical nephrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Both components and complexity groups of the radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score are associated with survival outcomes in renal tumour patients.

Hospital learning curves for robot-assisted surgeries: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted surgery has been rapidly adopted. It is important to define the learning curve to inform credentialling requirements, training programs, identify fast and slow learners, and protect patients. This study aimed to characterize the hospital learning curve for common robot-assisted procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

This cohort study, using administrative health data for Ontario, Canada, included adult patients who underwent a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), total robotic hysterectomy (TRH), robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), or robotic portal lobectomy using four arms (RPL-4) between 2010 and 2021. The association between cumulative hospital volume of a robot-assisted procedure and major complications was evaluated using multivariable logistic models adjusted for patient characteristics and clustering at the hospital level.

RESULTS

A total of 6814 patients were included, with 5230, 543, 465, and 576 patients in the RARP, TRH, RAPN, and RPL-4 cohorts, respectively. There was no association between cumulative hospital volume and major complications. Visual inspection of learning curves demonstrated a transient worsening of outcomes followed by subsequent improvements with experience. Operative time decreased for all procedures with increasing volume and reached plateaus after approximately 300 RARPs, 75 TRHs, and 150 RPL-4s. The odds of a prolonged length of stay decreased with increasing volume for patients undergoing a RARP (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.82-0.92) or RPL-4 (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.68-0.87).

CONCLUSION

Hospitals may adopt robot-assisted surgery without significantly increasing the risk of major complications for patients early in the learning curve and with an expectation of increasing efficiency.

Impact of tumor contact surface area on collecting system entry in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Collecting system entry in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy may occur even in cases showing a low N factor in the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score. Therefore, in this study, we focused on the tumor contact surface area with the adjacent renal parenchyma and attempted to construct a novel predictive model for collecting system entry.

METHODS

Among 190 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution from 2015 to 2021, 94 patients with a low N factor (1-2) were analyzed. Contact surface was measured with three-dimensional imaging software and defined as the C factor, classified as C1, < 10 cm [2]; C2, ≥ 10 and < 15 cm [2]; and C3: ≥ 15 cm [2]. Additionally, a modified R factor (mR) was classified as mR1, < 20 mm; mR2, ≥ 20 and < 40 mm; and mR3, ≥ 40 mm. We discussed the factors influencing collecting system entry, including the C factor, and created a novel collecting system entry predictive model.

RESULTS

Collecting system entry was observed in 32 patients with a low N factor (34%). The C factor was the only independent predictive factor for collecting system entry in multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio: 4.195, 95% CI: 2.160-8.146, p < 0.0001). Models including the C factor showed better discriminative power than the models without the C factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The new predictive model, including the C factor in N1-2 cases, may be beneficial, considering its indication for preoperative ureteral catheter placement in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Impact of perinephric fat volume and the Mayo Adhesive Probability score on time to clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of perinephric fat volume (PNFV) and the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score with time to clamping (TTC) in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The study subjects consisted of 73 tumors in 72 patients who underwent transperitoneal RAPN at a single cancer center between February 2020 and July 2022. Clinical characteristics including R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, MAP score and PNFV were evaluated in a multivariate analysis in relation to TTC, which was classified into two groups based on median TTC. PNFV and MAP score were analyzed separately. PNFVs were measured by SYNAPSE VINCENT^® by a single expert urologist. Median TTC was 67 (range: 36-119) min. Spearman's rank correlation analysis indicated that a significant correlation was observed between PNFV and MAP score with a value of 0.81 (p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis revealed that R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥ 7 (p = 0.036), posterior tumor location (p = 0.033), MAP score ≥ 3 (p = 0.02) and PNFV ≥ 250 ml (p = 0.02) were significant factors for prolonged TTC. In a multivariate analysis including PNFV (analysis 1), R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥ 7 (OR 3.54, p = 0.018) and PNFV ≥ 250cm³ (OR 3.94, p = 0.010) were independent factors for prolonged TTC. Similarly for MAP score (analysis 2), R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥ 7 (OR 3.54, p = 0.018) and MAP score ≥ 3 (OR 3.94, p = 0.010) were independent factors for prolonged TTC. Both MAP score and PNFV may have a significant impact on TTC.

Nephron-sparing surgery for Wilms tumor

The algorithm that has been used successfully in the surgical management of unilateral Wilms tumor, radical nephroureterectomy, cannot be used in children who present with synchronous bilateral renal masses. Instead, a surgical approach that removes all tumor masses while preserving as much normal renal parenchyma as possible is encouraged to avoid acute and long-term renal insufficiency. We will review technical aspects of the conduct of nephron-sparing surgery for synchronous bilateral Wilms tumor, including the more recent advances in the use of imaging adjuncts such as pre-operative 3D imaging and fluorescence-guided surgery. The potential role of nephron-sparing surgery for unilateral Wilms tumor will also be discussed.

Nephrometric scoring system: Recent advances and outlooks

A nephrometry scoring system is a key standard to evaluate the feasibility of partial nephrectomy (PN). Whether based on two-dimensional or three-dimensional images, simplicity, effectiveness, and practicality are the keys to the nephrometric scoring system. Since the emergence of RENAL score in 2009, numerous scoring systems based on different anatomical parameters are established to seek accurately and few parameters to assess the risk of PN and complications. This study aimed to achieve a three-game winning streak in PN more easily and efficiently (negative resection margin, maximum preservation of normal nephron function, and avoiding short-term and long-term complications). Using PubMed, we counted 28 kinds of nephrometric scoring systems. We considered only English literatures published and excluded editorials, commentaries, and meeting abstracts. To the best of our knowledge, this is to date and most comprehensive summary as well as an outlook of the nephrometric scoring system.

Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation with temporary balloon occlusion of the renal artery for the treatment of central renal tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report the technical feasibility and outcomes of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation with temporary balloon occlusion of the renal artery for the treatment of central renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients with central renal tumors treated with cryoablation and temporary renal artery occlusion from January 2017 to October 2021 were retrospectively included. Patient demographics, tumor's characteristics, procedural data, technical success, primary and secondary clinical efficacy, complications (according to Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe [CIRSE] classification) and follow-up were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients (8 men, 6 women; mean age 72.4 years ± 21.4 [SD] years; age range: 42-93 years) with 14 central renal tumors (median size, 32 mm; IQR: 23.5, 39.5 mm; range: 13-50 mm) were treated with percutaneous image-guided cryoablation and temporary balloon occlusion of the renal artery. Technical success was 13/14 (93%), with 1/14 (7%) failure of vascular access. A median of 4 cryoprobes (IQR: 3, 4.75) were inserted and protective hydrodissection was performed in 11/14 (79%) patients. Median time to perform cryoprobes insertion, hydrodissection and vascular access was 26.5 min (IQR: 18, 35 min), 10 min (IQR: 10, 17 min) and 30 min (IQR: 20, 45 min) respectively. Median duration of the whole intervention was 150 min (IQR: 129, 180 min; range: 100-270 min). Median hospital stay was 2.5 days (IQR: 2, 4 days; range: 2-14 days). Major complications occurred in 3/14 (21%) patients. Primary efficacy rate was 93% (13/14 patients). Median oncological follow-up was 25 months (IQR: 11, 33 months; range: 6-39 months). One patient experienced renal tumor recurrence at 14-months of follow-up, which was successfully treated with repeat cryoablation.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of renal tumors with temporary balloon occlusion of the renal artery is technically feasible, with a high technical success rate and paths the way for percutaneous treatment of central renal tumors.

3D printed kidney model could be an important educational tool for residents

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate whether it is useful for junior physicians to use a three-dimensional (3D) kidney model when evaluating the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An expert and four urology residents retrospectively evaluated the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of 64 renal tumors (62 patients) that underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our hospital. The expert evaluated 64 R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores with computed tomography (CT), whereas four residents evaluated 32 cases using CT alone and the other 32 cases using CT and a 3D kidney model. The consistency between the expert and residents was assessed by Cohen's kappa score. Patient-specific 3D kidney models were created in a gird style using a 3D printer based on CT or magnetic resonance imaging of the patient.

RESULTS

For all four residents, the accuracy of the overall R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was significantly higher with the 3D model and CT than with CT alone (P < .001). Regarding the individual components of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, the accuracy rates of "E," "N," "A," and "L" scores were higher with the 3D model and CT than with the CT alone (P = .020-.089).

CONCLUSION

Patient-specific 3D-printed kidney models could improve the resident's understanding of the renal tumor complexity and could be an important educational tool for residents.

A novel 3D deep learning model to automatically demonstrate renal artery segmentation and its validation in nephron-sparing surgery

Purpose

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is a mainstream treatment for localized renal tumors. Segmental renal artery clamping (SRAC) is commonly used in NSS. Automatic and precise segmentations of renal artery trees are required to improve the workflow of SRAC in NSS. In this study, we developed a tridimensional kidney perfusion (TKP) model based on deep learning technique to automatically demonstrate renal artery segmentation, and verified the precision and feasibility during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN).

Methods

The TKP model was established based on convolutional neural network (CNN), and the precision was validated in porcine models. From April 2018 to January 2020, TKP model was applied in laparoscopic PN in 131 patients with T1a tumors. Demographics, perioperative variables, and data from the TKP models were assessed. Indocyanine green (ICG) with near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging was applied after clamping and dice coefficient was used to evaluate the precision of the model.

Results

The precision of the TKP model was validated in porcine models with the mean dice coefficient of 0.82. Laparoscopic PN was successfully performed in all cases with segmental renal artery clamping (SRAC) under TKP model’s guidance. The mean operation time was 100.8 min; the median estimated blood loss was 110 ml. The ischemic regions recorded in NIRF imaging were highly consistent with the perfusion regions in the TKP models (mean dice coefficient = 0.81). Multivariate analysis revealed that the feeding lobar artery number was strongly correlated with tumor size and contact surface area; the supplying segmental arteries number correlated with tumor size.

Conclusions

Using the CNN technique, the TKP model is developed to automatically present the renal artery trees and precisely delineate the perfusion regions of different segmental arteries. The guidance of the TKP model is feasible and effective in nephron-sparing surgery.

A "3S+f" Nephrometry Score System to Predict the Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery

Background

When we treat renal cell carcinoma by laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), it is essential to use an evaluation system to predict clinical outcomes. Hitherto, there are more than a dozen nephrometry score systems. In this study, through assessing the correlations between nephrometry score systems and clinical outcomes, we aim to provide a novel nephrometry score system-the "3S+f" score system-to simplify the evaluation of technical complexity of partial nephrectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the data of 131 patients who underwent NSS, which was performed by a single surgeon (SZ) from January 2013 to July 2018 at Peking University Third Hospital. The "3S+f" score system contains four parameters: "size, side, site, and fat", all of which can be obtained from preoperative imaging data. We evaluated the correlations between the "3S+f" score and clinical outcomes, and compared R.E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score.

Results

All the three nephrometry score systems were related to some clinical outcomes in univariate analyses. In multivariate regression models, the "3S+f" score, the R.E.N.A.L. score, and the PADUA score were significantly associated with operative time (p = 0.016, p = 0.035, and p = 0.001, respectively) and warm ischemia time (all p = 0.008, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). "3S+f" was also significantly related to extubation time > 5 days (p = 0.018). In predicting operative time > 120 min and extubation time >5 days from ROC curves, the AUCs of the "3S+f" score (0.717 and 0.652, respectively) were larger than both the R.E.N.A.L (0.598 and 0.554, respectively) and PADUA (0.600 and 0.542, respectively) score systems.

Conclusion

A novel nephrometry score system-the "3S+f" score system-shows equivalent correlation and the ability in predicting clinical outcomes when compared to the R.E.N.A.L. score system and the PADUA score system, which can describe renal tumors.

Roughness of the renal tumor surface could predict the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative prediction of surgical difficulty of partial nephrectomy (PN) is essential to minimize the perioperative complications and to achieve a good surgical outcome. Recently, various scoring systems have been used to evaluate the difficulty of PN including R.E.N.A.L (Radius, Exophytic/Endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/Posterior, Location) nephrometry score. There were no scoring systems evaluating the roughness of the renal tumor surface and we hypothesized that the roughness of the renal tumor surface might affect the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of roughness of the renal tumor surface on the surgical outcome of RAPN.

METHODS

Overall, 161 patients underwent RAPN performed by the same surgeon between May 2016 and April 2019. We divided those tumors into two groups, like "roughness positive (tumor with roughness of tumor surface)" and "roughness negative (tumor without roughness of tumor surface)" according to the roughness of the endophytic region on preoperative computed tomography images. Clinical and pathological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-five and 78 tumors were identified roughness negative and positive, respectively. Cases with roughness positive showed a significantly longer operative time, console time, and ischemia time and had greater blood loss than those with roughness negative. Significant and independent predictors of ischemia time and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease were roughness of tumor surface, tumor size (not for eGFR decrease), and N score of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score.

CONCLUSION

Roughness of renal tumor surface was significantly and positively associated with ischemia time and the eGFR decrease rate.

The application of internal traction technique in retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal ventral tumors

Background

For patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery or multiple arteries, the retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN) is a better choice. The renal ventral tumor poses an additional challenge due to poor tumor exposure. This study is determined to assess the feasibility of an internal traction technique (ITT) in rRAPN for the management of renal ventral tumors.

Methods

From November 2019 to March 2021, a total of 28 patients with renal ventral tumor underwent rRAPN. All patients had prior abdominal surgery or multiple arteries. The ITT group (20 patients), which improved the tumor exposure by traction of the kidney with suture, was compared with the traditional technique group (8 patients) in terms of warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, retroperitoneal drainage, R.E.N.A.L. score, and serum creatinine. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

Results

All rRAPN surgeries were successful without conversion to radical nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was lower in the ITT group (17.10 min vs. 24.63 min; P < 0.05). Estimated blood loss in the traditional technique group was 324.88 ± 79.42 mL, and in the ITT group, it was 117.45±35.25 mL (P < 0.05). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, retroperitoneal drainage, R.E.N.A.L. score, and serum creatinine were observed between both groups. Surgical margins were negative and no intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 10 months of follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases.

Conclusion

ITT is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in rRAPN for renal ventral tumors. Application of ITT improved the exposure and reduces warm ischemic time in comparison with the conventional procedure.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02684-1.

Nephrometry scoring systems: their importance for the planning of nephron-sparing surgery and the relationships among them

In recent years, the development of new imaging techniques and scoring systems have improved the diagnosis and management of small renal masses. Imaging-based nephrometry scoring systems play an interesting role in the planning of nephron-sparing surgery, providing surgeons with the information necessary to determine the complexity of the renal mass, to deliver the appropriate postoperative care, and to predict adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to review nephrometry scoring systems, evaluating their characteristics and the relationships among them. The urology and radiology communities should decide which nephrometry scoring system will prevail and be used in daily practice.

Predicting Strict Trifecta Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, and C-Index Scores

Nephrometry scores are designed to characterize tumors and stratify the surgical complexity. It remains unclear as to which nephrometry score can accurately predict the surgical outcomes. We aimed to assess the utility of radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness, anterior/posterior, location (RENAL), preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic classifications (PADUA), and centrality index (C-index) nephrometry scores for predicting the strict Trifecta achievement from a single institution series robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively identified the prospectively maintained robotic surgery database records of 91 patients who underwent RAPN between June 2015 and September 2020 in Antalya Training and Research Hospital. The main outcome of the study was the achievement of strict Trifecta (negative surgical margin, no major urologic complications, warm ischemia time ≤25 min, and ≥85% preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate). A multivariable analysis was performed to identify the factors of strict Trifecta success. The mean patient age was 55.82 ± 13.37 years with a median clinical tumor size of 3.5 cm (IQR 2.5–4.9). The median RENAL, PADUA, and C-index score were 7(IQR 6–8), 8(IQR 7–10), and 2.01(IQR 1.64–2.72), respectively. A strict Trifecta could be achieved in 54 patients (59.3%). Clinical tumor size (P = 0.011), RENAL risk groups (low:reference; intermediate; P = 0.040; high; P = 0.009), PADUA risk groups (low:reference; intermediate; P = 0.044; high; P = 0.001) and C-index risk groups (low:reference; high; P = 0.015) were the independent predictors of strict Trifecta attainment in the multivariate analysis. None of the nephrometry scores were a superior predictor compared to other nephrometry scores in comparative analysis. RENAL, PADUA, and C-index scores were all independent predictors of a strict Trifecta achievement. Our comprehensive comparison of the three scores identified that none of the nephrometry scores proved to be inferior to others nephrometry scores.

A comparison of DAP and RENAL scoring systems in the achievement of trifecta in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

The concept of 'trifecta' outcome postulated for radical prostatectomy has been adopted for partial nephrectomy, the gold standard for management of small renal masses. We sought to evaluate the role of nephrometry scores in predicting outcomes in terms of the trifecta. We compared two scoring systems for renal tumour complexity (RENAL and DAP) in the prediction of trifecta outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic PN (LPN) were evaluated in a single-centre retrospective study (2010-2017). RENAL and DAP scores were measured. Parameters relevant to the trifecta were tabulated.

RESULTS

When comparing the two scoring systems in terms of warm ischaemia time (WIT), the DAP score could predict with statistically significant accuracy the completion of resection within 25 mins of WIT. Tumours were more evenly distributed according to anatomical characteristics with the DAP scoring system than with the RENAL scoring system. When comparing these systems in terms of complications, neither predicted complications based on complexity with significant accuracy. A low RENAL score predicted trifecta achievement in three-fourth (71.4%) of patients, while a medium RENAL score predicted trifecta achievement in half (54%) of patients. DAP score predicted trifecta achievement in all tumours with a low score, two-third (66%) in medium and less than half (42%) with a high score. Predictions based on DAP were accurate and significantly so (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

DAP score predicted the outcomes of LPN in terms of trifecta significantly better than the RENAL score. In our experience, the DAP score was able to distribute tumour complexity among its groups more effectively than the RENAL score. There is early evidence that the DAP score may be more useful than the RENAL score for decision-making in nephron sparing surgery. This is especially pertinent for small renal masses at the upper limits of tumour complexity for which minimally invasive techniques can be safely applied.

Parallel comparison of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and C-index scoring systems in predicting outcomes after partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To parallelly compare the applicability of the radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness, anterior/posterior, location nephrometry score (R.E.N.A.L.), the Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA), and the centrality index (C‐index) scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN).

Methods

We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science to perform a meta‐analysis examining the correlation coefficients between three nephrometry scores (NSs) and warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), operation time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and absolute change in eGFR (ACE) up to 25 January 2021.

Results

In total, 13 studies including 1496 patients met the criteria for further analysis. Overall, all scoring systems had statistically significant correlations with the WIT, EBL, OT, ACE and LOS and ACE, except for the correlation between PADUA and LOS (r = 0.16 [−0.00, 0.31], p > 0.05). The C‐index had the strongest correlation with WIT (r = −0.35 [−0.43, −0.26], p < 0.05) and ACE (r = −0.29 [−0.48, −0.10], p < 0.05). Weak correlations were observed between OT as well as EBL and each scoring system. Publication bias was observed in PADUA score predicting ACE (p = 0.04) and high heterogeneity was found in some of our results.

Conclusion

Until now, this is the first meta‐analysis that parallelly compares these three scoring systems in predicting outcomes after PN. We found that all NSs showed a statistically significant correlation with WIT, EBL, OT, and ACE. Moreover, the C‐index scoring system is the best predictor of WIT and ACE. Due to the existence of publication bias and high heterogeneity, more well‐designed and large‐scale studies are warranted for validation.

To our knowledge, this is the first meta‐analysis that parallelly compares these three scoring systems in predicting outcomes after PN. Overall, three scoring systems were significantly correlated with WIT, EBL, OT and ACE. Moreover, the C‐index scoring system outperformed R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scoring systems in WIT and ACE.

The associations of RENAL, PADUA and C-index nephrometry scores with perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the utility of the radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness, anterior/posterior, location (RENAL); preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomic evaluation (PADUA), and centrality index (C-index) scores for the outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients who underwent PN with contrast-enhanced preoperative imaging from January 2015 to June 2018 were identified. The RENAL, PADUA, and C-index scores were assigned. The correlation between these scoring systems and perioperative and long-term renal functional outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were included in the study (58 men and 20 women; age, 58±11.4 years). Median warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and operation time (OT) were 26 min, 115 mL, and 140 min, respectively. The RENAL score was related to WIT, EBL, and OT (p<0.001, p=0.003, and p=0.023, respectively). The PADUA score was associated with WIT, EBL, and OT (p<0.001, p=0.013, and p=0.005, respectively). The C-index score was correlated with WIT, EBL, and OT (p<0.001, p=0.010, and p=0.001, respectively). The C-index score also correlated with the percentage change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p=0.037). However, on univariable and multivariable regression analyses, only WIT significantly affected the postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction.

CONCLUSION

The RENAL, PADUA, and C-index scores were significantly associated with perioperative outcomes of PN. In addition, the C-index score was correlated with long-term renal functional outcomes.

A novel nephrometry scoring system for predicting peri-operative outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Background:

Although the impact of tumor complexity on peri-operative outcomes has been well established using several nephrometry scoring systems, the impact of adherent perirenal fat remains poorly defined. This study aimed to develop a novel nephrometry scoring system for predicting the peri-operative outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) by integrating and optimizing the RENAL score (RNS) and Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated 159 patients treated with retroperitoneal LPN. The patients’ demographic parameters, RNSs, and MAP scores were evaluated as potential predictors of perioperative outcomes, including operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin, ischemia, and complication (MIC) achievement rate. The independent predictors were used to develop a novel nephrometry scoring system. The predictive value and inter-observer agreement for the novel nephrometry scoring system were evaluated.

Results:

Tumor radius (R score), nearness to the renal sinus or collecting system (N score), and posterior perinephric fat thickness were independent predictors of peri-operative outcomes and were used to develop the RNP score. The univariate analysis revealed that the RNP score was significantly associated with operation time, EBL, and MIC achievement rate (P < 0.050). The RNP score was an independent predictor of operation time (P < 0.001), EBL (P = 0.018), and MIC achievement rate (P = 0.023) in the multivariate analysis. The RNP score was not inferior to RNS in the area under the curve for predicting peri-operative outcomes and performed better in inter-observer agreement (76.7% vs. 57.8%) and kappa value (0.804 vs. 0.726).

Conclusion:

The RNP score, combining the advantages of the RNS and MAP score, demonstrated a good predictive value for the peri-operative outcomes of retroperitoneal LPN and better inter-observer agreement.

The role of RENAL, PADUA, C-index, CSA nephrometry systems in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy

Background

Functional outcome is an important issue in nephron-sparing surgery. Various nephrometries have been developed to predict renal function preservation. The aim of this study was to examine the applicability of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, C-index, and mathematical tumor contact surface area (CSA) in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy using radio-isotope scans.

Methods

We performed this retrospective study in patients who underwent partial nephrectomy between May 2013 and April 2017, and used abdominopelvic computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to obtain R.E.N.A.L., C-index, and CSA. Renal function was measured by 99mTc mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3). We evaluated correlations between nephrometries and perioperative parameters, and comparatively analyzed different nephrometries to determine the predictive ability in the percent change of effective renal plasma flow of the affected kidney.

Results

Three, two, and 35 patients received partial nephrectomy in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches, respectively. The median (IQR) tumor size was 3.13 (2.4) cm. The median (IQR) R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, C-index, and CSA scores were 7 (3), 8 (2), 2.01 (1.87), and 14.14 (19.25) cm², respectively. Spearman correlation analysis showed that four nephrometries were correlated with each other. The strongest correlations were between CSA and C-index (coefficient: − 0.885, p < 0.001), followed by R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA (coefficient: 0.778, p < 0.001). Ischemia time was significantly correlated with R.EN.A.L. (coefficient: 0.35, p = 0.025), PADUA (coefficient: 0.42, p = 0.007), C-index (coefficient: − 0.45, p = 0.004), and CSA (coefficient: 0.41, p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, PADUA significantly affected ischemia time (p = 0.04). The percent change in effective renal plasma flow (PCE) of the operated kidney was correlated with PADUA (coefficient: 0.48 p = 0.002), C-index (coefficient: − 0.74, p < 0.001), and CSA (coefficient: 0.75, p < 0.001). Only CSA and C-index independently affected PCE (both p < 0.05) in multivariate analysis. In ROC curve analysis, both C-index and CSA could predict 20% change in effective renal plasma flow (AUC: 0.91 vs 0.86, p = 0.2) of the affected kidney.

Conclusions

We suggest using PADUA to evaluate surgical complexity and ischemia time. Regarding the accuracy of the prediction of post-operative ipsilateral renal function, both CSA and C-index outperformed R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA nephrometries.

[Evaluation of the Padua and R.E.N.A.L. scores regarding their validity and implication in the perioperative management during partial nephrectomy]

BACKGROUND

 Due to the rapid development of minimally-invasive surgery, there is a broader indication for surgical preservation of renal tissue. Current research suggests that, apart from the size of the tumour, its exact anatomical position should be considered when seeking optimal surgical treatment for individual patients. Therefore, numerous nephrometry scores have emerged, the Padua score and the R.E.N.A.L. score being most commonly used. Based on our patient population, we aimed to shed light on the question which score is best suited to assess the feasibility of nephron-sparing surgery and which can predict complications most accurately.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 This study included 117 patients treated with partial nephrectomy at the University Hospital in Kiel (UKSH, Campus Kiel) between 2014 and 2017. The imaging results (computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography) were retrospectively evaluated according to the Padua and R.E.N.A.L. score criteria. In some cases, radical nephrectomy became necessary despite the planned partial nephrectomy. We evaluated group differences regarding both nephrometry scores in these cases and the cases without radical nephrectomy. Then we performed correlation analyses regarding score outcome, operation time as well as perioperative, postoperative and overall complications.

RESULTS

 The tumours requiring treatment by radical nephrectomy (10 out of 117) had significantly higher scores only when the R.E.N.A.L. score was applied (mean difference 1.059, p < 0.05). Both the Padua and the R.E.N.A.L. score were positive correlated with operation time (R.E.N.A.L. score: correlation coefficient 0.284, p < 0.05, Padua score: coefficient 0.312, p < 0.05) as well as perioperative, postoperative and overall complications (R.E.N.A.L. score: coefficient 0.216, p < 0.05, Padua score: coefficient 0.192, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 Each of the examined scores can be used to assess the risk of partial nephrectomy. For our patients, the preoperative application of the R.E.N.A.L. score would have been advantageous. Preoperative nephrometry scores are a useful tool and should be applied in addition to the surgeon's subjective evaluation. There is a lack of prospective studies investigating this issue.

Predicting morbidity after robotic partial nephrectomy: The effect of tumor, environment, and patient-related factors

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of tumor and nontumor related parameters on perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent RPN for a localized renal tumor at 2 institutions between June 2010 and November 2016 were reviewed. RENAL and Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) scores were calculated and information on comorbid conditions including ASA score, performance status, Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI), and history of cardiovascular disease was collected. Correlations between each variable and warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and length of hospital stay were assessed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the best predictors of overall complications, major complications, risk of conversion, and Trifecta achievement.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients were included. RENAL score was found to have a statistically significant (P<0.05) correlation with warm ischemia time, EBL, and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate. MAP score showed significant association (P<0.05) with operative time and EBL. CCI had a significant correlation (P<0.05) with length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. In multivariable analyses, MAP score as a continuous variable (OR = 7.66; P<0.001) and MAP risk group stratification (OR = 3.29; P = 0.005) were independent predictors of the risk of conversion. Major complications were significantly associated with the cardiovascular disease in both univariable (OR = 2.35; P = 0.01) and multivariable analysis (OR = 4.52, P = 0.01). Finally, the MAP score as a continuous variable was an independent factor of Trifecta achievement (OR = 0.56; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Patients related factors were the most important determinants of postoperative complications after RPN. RENAL and MAP scores had some influence on intraoperative parameters.

Renal Hilar Lesions: Biological Implications for Complex Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comprehensive histopathologic review of sporadic resected solitary cT1 renal masses comparing those with and without radiographic involvement of the hilum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried for all cT1 renal masses undergoing resection classified per the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Hilar masses were defined as tumors that abut the main renal artery or vein on cross-sectional imaging. Demographic, treatment, renal mass, and histopathologic characteristics were compared between hilar and nonhilar renal masses. Multivariate regression model analyses were performed to assess factors associated with renal mass upstaging and disease recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 1324 stage 1 renal masses met criteria for analysis of which 226 (17.1%) were defined as hilar. Hilar masses were larger, scored with higher complexity, and more likely to undergo a radical nephrectomy. On histopathologic analysis, we found no difference between hilar and nonhilar masses regarding the incidence of malignancy, presence of high nuclear grade, or risk of upstaging. On multivariate analysis, a tumor's hilar location was not associated with upstaging or disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

We present a comprehensive histopathologic review of a large cohort of cT1 hilar lesions noting no difference in the risk of malignancy, high nuclear grade, upstaging, or recurrence when compared to nonhilar lesions. Together, these data suggest that there is no compelling cancer-specific rationale to perform a radical nephrectomy when managing renal hilar tumors.

The role of RENAL, PADUA and C-index scoring systems in predicting the results of partial nephrectomy without ischemia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and renoprotective effect of off-clamp partial nephrectomy (PN) by renal scoring systems.

METHODS

After approval of the local ethics committee, the radiological and clinical data of patients with renal masses who underwent PN between January 2012 and January 2017 were evaluated in two university hospitals. Total 132 patients who underwent open surgery and off-clamp technique were included. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively. Preoperative demographic data, estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) and hematocrit changes, operation time, tumor volume and hospitalization time from patients were evaluated separately and statistically for each of the three scoring systems.

RESULTS

Our study consisted of 132 patients with a mean age of 53.9 ± 13.9 with 69 male and 63 female. Statistically significant difference between the risk groups in RENAL and PADUA scoring were found according to tumor T stage and tumor volüme (p <0.005). Statistically significant difference was only found between risk groups of RENAL scoring system in e-GFR reduction (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the complications of all three classification systems (p > 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, all three scoring sytem successfully predicted the surgical complexity ve surgical outcomes and our results indicate that off-clamp PN has similar success and complications rates when compared to the literature. The off-clamp PN must be kept in mind to maintain postoperative renal functions eligible patients.

Role of R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Background:

Preoperative anatomical scoring system is conducive to comparison between treatment options and evaluation of postoperative outcomes in patients with small renal tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application efficacy of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) in predicting perioperative outcomes in patients with renal tumor who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

Methods:

The clinical data of 139 patients with renal tumors who underwent LPN between 2009 and 2015 were collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to their RNS (low, moderate, and high). Clinical characteristics including perioperative variables, complications, and RNS were compared to evaluate the differences between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of postoperative complications.

Results:

According to the RNS, there were 74, 50, and 15 patients in the low, moderate, and high RNS groups, respectively. There were significant differences in estimated blood loss (EBL; χ² = 7.285, P = 0.026), warm ischemia time (WIT; χ² = 13.718, P = 0.001), operation time (OT; χ² = 6.882, P = 0.032), perioperative creatinine clearance change (PCCC; χ² = 6.206, P = 0.045), and number of patients with complications (NPC; P = 0.002) among the three groups. The values for EBL, WIT, OT, PCCC, and NPC for patients in the high RNS group were higher than those for patients in the low RNS group. After adjustment for OT, WIT, and EBL, RNS was statistically significantly associated with the risk of postoperative complications in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio = 1.541, 95% confidence interval: 1.059–2.242, P = 0.024).

Conclusions:

The RNS is a valuable tool for evaluating the complexity of renal tumor anatomy. It can aid surgeons in preoperative decision-making concerning management therapy. Future multicenter, large sample size studies are warranted for evaluating its predicting performance of perioperative outcomes.