1
|
Desmond C, Kaul S, Fleishman A, Korets R, Chang P, Wagner A, Kim SP, Aghdam N, Olumi AF, Gershman B. The association of patient and disease characteristics with the overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00822-2. [PMID: 38555410 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00822-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although active surveillance is the preferred management for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), some men remain at risk of overtreatment with definitive local therapy. We hypothesized that baseline characteristics may be associated with overtreatment and represent a potential source of health disparities. We therefore examined the associations of patient and disease characteristics with the surgical overtreatment of low-risk PCa. METHODS We identified men aged 45-75 years with cT1 cN0 cM0 prostate adenocarcinoma with biopsy Gleason score 6 and PSA < 10 ng/ml from 2010-2016 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the associations of baseline characteristics with clinically insignificant PCa (iPCa) at RP (i.e., "overtreatment"), defined as organ-confined (i.e., pT2) Gleason 3 + 3 disease, using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS We identified 36,088 men with low-risk PCa who underwent RP. The unadjusted rate of iPCa decreased during the study period, from 54.7% in 2010 to 40.0% in 2016. In multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics, older age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.98), later year of diagnosis (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.67 for 2016 vs. 2010), Black race (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91), treatment at an academic/research program (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.91), higher PSA (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.92), and higher number of positive biopsy cores (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.86-0.88) were independently associated with a lower risk of overtreatment (iPCa) at RP. Conversely, a greater number of biopsy cores sampled (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02) was independently associated with an increased risk of overtreatment (iPCa) at RP. CONCLUSIONS We observed an ~27% reduction in rates of overtreatment of men with low-risk PCa over the study period. Several patient, disease, and structural characteristics are associated with detection of iPCa at RP and can inform the management of men with low-risk PCa to reduce potential overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sumedh Kaul
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron Fleishman
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruslan Korets
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Chang
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Wagner
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simon P Kim
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aria F Olumi
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Data. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174161. [PMID: 36077698 PMCID: PMC9454661 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary AS is an option for the initial management of selected patients with intermediate-risk PC. The proper way to predict which men will have an aggressive clinical course or indolent PC who would benefit from AS has not been unveiled. Genetics and MRI can help in the decision-making, but it remains unclear which men would benefit from which tests. In addition, there are several differences between AS protocols in inclusion criteria, monitoring follow-up, and triggers for active treatment. Large series and a few RCTs are under investigation, and more research is needed to establish an optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with intermediate-risk PC. This study summarizes the current data on patients with intermediate-risk PC under AS, recent findings, and discusses future directions. Abstract Active surveillance (AS) is a monitoring strategy to avoid or defer curative treatment, minimizing the side effects of radiotherapy and prostatectomy without compromising survival. AS in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) has increasingly become used. There is heterogeneity in intermediate-risk PC patients. Some of them have an aggressive clinical course and require active treatment, while others have indolent disease and may benefit from AS. However, intermediate-risk patients have an increased risk of metastasis, and the proper way to select the best candidates for AS is unknown. In addition, there are several differences between AS protocols in inclusion criteria, monitoring follow-up, and triggers for active treatment. A few large series and randomized trials are under investigation. Therefore, more research is needed to establish an optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with intermediate-risk disease. This study summarizes the current data on patients with intermediate-risk PC under AS, recent findings, and discusses future directions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Pincus J, Greenberg JW, Natale C, Koller CR, Miller S, Silberstein JL, Krane LS. Five-Year Prospective Observational Study of African-American Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Demonstrates Race Is Not Predictive of Oncologic Outcomes. Oncologist 2022; 28:149-156. [PMID: 35920550 PMCID: PMC9907040 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to evaluate if race impacted outcomes or risk of disease progression in men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. We present the results from our majority African-American cohort of men in an equal access setting over a 5-year follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients who elected AS for prostate cancer at the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System are entered into a prospectively managed observational database. Patients were divided into groups based on self-reported race. Grade group progression was defined as pathologic upgrading above International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 disease on subsequent biopsies following diagnostic biopsy. All tests were 2 sided using a significance of .05. RESULTS A total of 228 men met inclusion criteria in the study, including 154 non-Hispanic African American and 74 non-Hispanic Caucasian American men, with a median follow-up of 5 years from the initiation of AS. Race was not predictive of Gleason grade progression, AS discontinuation, or biochemical recurrence on Cox multivariate analysis (HR = 1.01, 0.94, 0.85, P = .96, .79, .81, respectively). On Kaplan-Meier analysis at 5 years, African-American progression-free, AS discontinuation free, and overall survival probability was comparable to their Caucasian American counterparts (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS Active surveillance is a safe treatment option for low and very low risk prostate cancer, regardless of race. African-American and Caucasian-American men did not have any significant difference in Gleason grade group progression in our cohort with 5-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Caleb Natale
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Christopher R Koller
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Stephanie Miller
- Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - L Spencer Krane
- Corresponding author: L. Spencer Krane, MD, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, 2400 Canal St, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA. Tel: +1 504 988 2750; Fax: +1 504 988 5059;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oehrlein N, Streicher SA, Kuo HC, Chaurasia A, McFadden J, Nousome D, Chen Y, Stroup SP, Musser J, Brand T, Porter C, Rosner IL, Chesnut GT, Onofaro KC, Rebbeck TR, D'Amico A, Lu-Yao G, Cullen J. Race-specific prostate cancer outcomes in a cohort of military health care beneficiaries undergoing surgery: 1990-2017. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4354-4365. [PMID: 35638719 PMCID: PMC9678085 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is substantial variability in prostate cancer (PCa) mortality rates across Caucasian American (CA), African American (AA), Asian, and Hispanic men; however, these estimates are unable to disentangle race or ethnicity from confounding factors. The current study explores survival differences in long‐term PCa outcomes between self‐reported AA and CA men, and examines clinicopathologic features across self‐reported CA, AA, Asian, and Hispanic men. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized the Center for Prostate Disease Research (CPDR) Multi‐center National Database from 1990 to 2017. Subjects were consented at military treatment facilities nationwide. AA, CA, Asian, or Hispanic men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized PCa within the first year of diagnosis were included in the analyses. Time from RP to biochemical recurrence (BCR), BCR to metastasis, and metastasis to overall death were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier unadjusted estimation curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression. Results This study included 7067 men, of whom 5155 (73%) were CA, 1468 (21%) were AA, 237 (3%) were Asian, and 207 (3%) were Hispanic. AA men had a significantly decreased time from RP to BCR compared to CA men (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06–1.48, p = 0.01); however, no difference was observed between AA and CA men for a time from BCR to metastasis (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.39–1.33, p = 0.302) and time from metastasis to overall death (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.36–1.26, p = 0.213). Conclusions In an equal access health care setting, AA men had a shorter survival time from RP to BCR, but comparable survival time from BCR to metastasis and metastasis to overall death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Oehrlein
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Samantha A Streicher
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Huai-Ching Kuo
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Avinash Chaurasia
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jacob McFadden
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Darryl Nousome
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Yongmei Chen
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sean P Stroup
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Department of Urology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - John Musser
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Timothy Brand
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Christopher Porter
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Inger L Rosner
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gregory T Chesnut
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kayla C Onofaro
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Department of Urology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Anthony D'Amico
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Grace Lu-Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Jefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hinata N, Fujisawa M. Racial Differences in Prostate Cancer Characteristics and Cancer-Specific Mortality: An Overview. World J Mens Health 2022; 40:217-227. [PMID: 35021294 PMCID: PMC8987139 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.210070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Racial differences of prostate cancer incidence and mortality among Asian, Black, and Caucasian men have been known, however, comprehensive update of this topic is not yet reported. In the present review, an overview of the racial differences in prostate cancer characteristics and cancer-specific mortality is collected and reviewed. Regarding racial differences of incidence and mortality, surprising differences in the incidence of prostate cancer are seen among different populations around the world, with some countries having rates that are 60 to 100 times higher than others. African-American men have a higher incidence of prostate cancer, higher prostate cancer mortality, and are diagnosed with prostate cancer at a younger age than Caucasian American men. Furthermore, race is gaining attention as an important factor to consider for planning active surveillance for localized prostate cancer, especially among African-Americans. In addition, the causes of these differences are being elucidated by genomic profiling. Determinants of racial disparities are multifactorial, including socioeconomic and biologic factors. Although race-specific differences in prostate cancer survival estimates appear to be narrowing over time, there is an ongoing need to continue to understand and mitigate racial factors associated with disparities in health care outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Hinata
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beckmann K, Santaolalla A, Helleman J, Carroll P, Ha Chung B, Shiong Lee L, Perry A, Rubio-Briones J, Sugimoto M, Trock B, Valdagni R, Dasgupta P, Van Hemelrijck M, Elhage O. Comparison of Characteristics, Follow-up and Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer According to Ethnicity in the GAP3 Global Consortium Database. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 34:47-54. [PMID: 34934967 PMCID: PMC8655390 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies of active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) have focussed predominantly on Caucasian populations. Little is known about the experience of Asian men, while suitability for men of African descent has been questioned. OBJECTIVE To compare baseline characteristics, follow-up, and outcomes for men on AS for PCa, according to ethnicity. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The study cohort included 13 centres from the GAP3 consortium that record ethnicity (categorised broadly as Caucasian/white, African/Afro-Caribbean/black, Asian, mixed/other, and unknown). Men with biopsy grade group >2, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/ml, T stage ≥cT3, or age >80 yr were excluded. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Clinical characteristics, follow-up schedules, outcome status, and reasons for discontinuation were compared across ethnic groups. Risk of upgrading, potential disease progression (grade group ≥3 or T stage ≥3), suspicious indications (any upgrading, number of positive cores >3, T stage ≥cT3, PSA >20 ng/ml, or PSA density >0.2 ng/ml/cc2), and conversion to treatment were assessed using mixed-effect regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The eligible cohort (n = 9158) comprised 83% Caucasian men, 6% men of African descent, 5% Asian men, 2% men of mixed/other ethnicity, and 4% men of unknown ethnicity. Risks of suspicious indicators (hazard ratio = 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.45), upgrading (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% CI 1.14-1.71), and potential progression (OR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.06-2.01) were higher among African/black than among Caucasian/white men. Risk of transitioning to treatment did not differ by ethnicity. More Asian than Caucasian men converted without progression (42% vs 26%, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity in surveillance protocols and racial makeup limit interpretation. CONCLUSIONS This multinational study found differences in the risk of disease progression and transitioning to treatment without signs of progression between ethnic groups. Further research is required to determine whether differences are due to biology, sociocultural factors, and/or clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY This international study compared prostate cancer active surveillance outcomes by ethnicity. Risks of upgrading and disease progression were higher among African than among Caucasian men. Transitioning to treatment without progression was highest among Asian men. Understanding of these differences requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerri Beckmann
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Corresponding author. Level 8 SAHMRI Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia. Tel. +61 8 83027019.
| | - Aida Santaolalla
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jozien Helleman
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Carroll
- Department of Urology, UCSF – Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Byung Ha Chung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Lui Shiong Lee
- Department of Urology, Sengkang General Hospital and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Bruce Trock
- Johns Hopkins University, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology and Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Oussama Elhage
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
George DJ, Ramaswamy K, Huang A, Russell D, Mardekian J, Schultz NM, Janjan N, Freedland SJ. Survival by race in men with chemotherapy-naive enzalutamide- or abiraterone-treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 25:524-530. [PMID: 34732856 PMCID: PMC9385484 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00463-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black men are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer (PC) and die from PC than white men. However, black men with metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) had longer overall survival (OS) than white men when treated with certain agents in clinical trials. We analyzed claims data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) database to evaluate OS in black and white men treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone (novel hormonal therapy [NHT]) for chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. METHODS Patients with mCRPC aged ≥18 years were identified in the VHA database by diagnosis codes, evidence of surgical/medical castration, and a prescription claim for enzalutamide or abiraterone after castration from April 2014-March 2017. Cox models assessed associations between race and OS. Unadjusted and multivariable analyses were performed on the entire population and subsets based on the type of therapy received (if any) after NHT. RESULTS In total, 2910 patients were identified (787 black, mean 71.7 years; 2123 white, mean 74.0 years). Median follow-up was 19.0 and 18.7 months in blacks and whites, respectively. Black men had better survival versus white men: hazard ratios (95% CIs) were 0.89 (0.790-0.996; P = 0.044) and 0.67 (0.592-0.758; P < 0.0001) in the unadjusted and multivariable models, respectively. Statistically significantly longer OS was seen in black versus white men regardless of subsequent treatment, including no subsequent treatment. CONCLUSIONS In the VHA, black men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC initiating NHT may have better outcomes than similarly treated white men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J George
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. .,Section of Hematology and Oncology, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | - Ahong Huang
- Fomerly of STATinMED Research, Plano, TX, USA.,Tigermed, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Stephen J Freedland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Section of Urology, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mahal BA, Gerke T, Awasthi S, Soule HR, Simons JW, Miyahira A, Halabi S, George D, Platz EA, Mucci L, Yamoah K. Prostate Cancer Racial Disparities: A Systematic Review by the Prostate Cancer Foundation Panel. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:18-29. [PMID: 34446369 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer (PCa) is a complex disease that disproportionately impacts Black men in the USA. The structural factors that drive heterogeneous outcomes for patients of differing backgrounds are probably the same ones that result in population-level disparities. The relative contribution of drivers along the PCa disease continuum is an active area of investigation and debate. OBJECTIVE To critically synthesize the available evidence on PCa disparities from a population-level perspective in comparison to data from "equal access and equal care settings" and to provide a consensus summary of the state of PCa disparities. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A plenary panel on PCa disparities presented at the Prostate Cancer Foundation meeting on October 24, 2019 and ensuing discussions are reported here. We used a systematic literature review approach and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses to select the most relevant publications. A total of 3333 publications between 2011 and 2021 were retrieved, of which 52 were included in the review; an additional 13 articles on screening guidelines, seminal clinical trials, and statistical methodology were used in the evidence synthesis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Race disparities in PCa are a result of a complex interaction between socioeconomic factors impacting access to care and ancestral/genetic factors that may influence tumor biology. Black men in the USA continue to have a nearly 1.8 times higher population-level mortality rate than White men. Failure to account for the race-specific incidence burden would continue to lead to residual disparity even after achieving relatively similar outcomes after primary treatment, resulting in a higher long-term mortality burden. Selection bias remains possible in PCa studies, which often rely on highly specific cohorts of Black men with higher use of health care resources that may not represent the average Black patient in the USA. Novel methods including mediation analysis and genetic ancestry rather than self-identified race can optimize analytical models investigating racial disparities and may lead to a better understanding of PCa genomic diversity and behavior. CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasize the importance of racially diverse studies, including precision -omics, prevention, and targeted therapy initiatives, to elucidate mechanisms underlying racial differences in outcomes and response to therapy. We propose novel approaches for studying and addressing PCa disparities. Contemporary methods, particularly in the domain of mediation analysis, can promote scientific rigor in understanding these disparities. PATIENT SUMMARY Inaccurate data interpretation or lack of data altogether for Black men can impact policy and ultimately affect millions of individuals of African origin worldwide. Our review identifies a need to develop and prioritize a strategy for including Black and other men with prostate cancer in intervention studies and randomized clinical trials to halt the widening prostate cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon A Mahal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Travis Gerke
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel George
- Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Platz
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology and the James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lorelei Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kidd LC, Loecher M, Ahmed N, Terzian J, Song J, Reese AC. Prostate cancer active surveillance outcomes in a cohort composed primarily of African American and Hispanic American Men. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:730.e1-730.e8. [PMID: 34400068 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Active surveillance outcomes in minority patients are poorly characterized, as most surveillance series are comprised primarily of Caucasian men. We aimed to characterize outcomes of African American and Hispanic men undergoing surveillance and to identify factors associated with transition to definitive treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of men undergoing active surveillance at our institution. Reasons for transition to definitive treatment were determined. Cessation of active surveillance was recommended for Gleason upgrading on surveillance biopsy. We characterized treatment-free survival for men on surveillance and compared this by race/ethnicity (as self reported by patients). Demographic and clinical variables associated with active surveillance cessation were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS A total of 141 men were on active surveillance: 84 non-Hispanic Black/African American (59.6%), 32 Hispanic (22.7%), and 25 non-Hispanic White/Caucasian (17.7%). Two-year treatment-free survival for Caucasian, Black and Hispanic patients was 81.2%, 54.4%, and 75.0%, respectively. Pairwise Cox proportional hazards analysis showed significantly decreased treatment-free survival in Black compared to Caucasian men (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.03-5.68). In African American men, cessation of active surveillance occurred most commonly due to grade reclassification at the time of confirmatory biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Among our active surveillance cohort composed primarily of racial and ethnic minorities, we identified relatively high rates of progression to definitive treatment. African American race was associated with surveillance cessation on univariate analysis. These findings stress the importance of confirmatory biopsy and strict compliance with surveillance protocols in AA men to ensure timely detection of disease reclassification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Kidd
- Department of Urology, The Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Matthew Loecher
- Department of Urology, The Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nahrin Ahmed
- Department of Urology, The Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph Terzian
- Department of Urology, The Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jun Song
- Department of Urology, The Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam C Reese
- Department of Urology, The Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Progression on active surveillance for prostate cancer in Black men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 25:165-173. [PMID: 34239046 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00425-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies evaluated prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes in Black men on active surveillance (AS); most studies contained few Black men and results were conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyze of race and outcomes on AS. METHODS A systematic search was performed for articles of men with Grade Group 1 or 2 (GG1 or GG2) PCa on AS. All studies required race-specific comparative progression data. Progression to treatment, PSA, or biopsy progression were considered and relative risk (RR) estimates of Black men progressing were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. Differences by study-level characteristics were evaluated using subgroup and a cumulative meta-analysis by time. RESULTS In total, 12 studies were included (3137 Black and 12,206 non-Black men); eight prospective (27%, n = 4210) and four retrospectives (73%, n = 11,133) cohorts. The overall RR of progression for Black men was 1.62 (95%CI, 1.21-2.17), I2 = 64% (95% CI, 32-80%), (χ2 = 30.23; P = 0.001; τ2 = 0.16). Black men with GG1 PCa alone had a higher pooled progression: RR = 1.81 (95% CI, 1.23-2.68). Including only studies with clinical progression (excluding progression to treatment), potentiated results: RR = 1.82 (95%CI, 1.27-2.60). However, a cumulative meta-analysis demonstrated decreasing pooled effect over time, with contemporary studies after 2019 showing a tempered effect (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.20-1.39). CONCLUSIONS Many studies attribute racial disparity in PCa to delayed presentation of disease, however, AS is unique since all AS eligible men have a low grade and stage PCa. Our findings suggest Black men may have an increased risk of progression during AS, but the association is not so strong that Black men should be discouraged from undergoing AS. Indeed, contemporary evidence suggests stricter inclusion, better confirmatory testing or better access to care may temper these findings. Importantly, these results utilize self-reported race, a social construct that has many limitations.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nelson TJ, Javier-DesLoges J, Deka R, Courtney PT, Nalawade V, Mell L, Murphy J, Parsons JK, Rose BS. Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity With Clinical Progression Among African American and Non-Hispanic White Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e219452. [PMID: 33999164 PMCID: PMC8129822 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The association of prostate-specific antigen velocity (PSAV) with clinical progression in patients with localized prostate cancer managed with active surveillance remains unclear and, to our knowledge, has not been studied in African American patients. OBJECTIVES To test the hypothesis that PSAV is associated with clinical progression in patients with low-risk prostate cancer treated with active surveillance and to identify differences between African American and non-Hispanic White patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective population-based cohort study using patient records from the Veterans Heath Administration Informatics and Computing Infrastructure on 5296 patients with a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2015, who were managed with active surveillance. Follow-up extended through March 31, 2020. Low-risk prostate cancer was defined as International Society of Urologic Pathology grade group (GG) 1 clinical tumor stage 2A or lower, PSA level of 10 ng/dL or lower, active surveillance, and no definitive treatment within the first year after diagnosis with at least 1 additional staging biopsy after diagnostic biopsy. EXPOSURES Prostate-specific antigen testing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was GG progression detected after repeated biopsy or prostatectomy, defined as GG2 or higher or GG3 or higher. The secondary outcome was incident metastases. Cumulative incidence functions and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test associations between PSAV and outcomes. RESULTS The final cohort (n = 5296) included 3919 non-Hispanic White men (74.0%; mean [SD] age, 65.7 [5.8] years) and 1377 African American men (26.0%; mean [SD] age, 62.8 [6.6] years). Compared with African American patients, non-Hispanic White patients were older (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [5.8] years vs 62.8 [6.6] years; P < .001), presented with higher cT stage (stage T2, 608 [15.5%] vs 111 [8.1%]; P < .001), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (1 and ≥2, 912 [23.3%] vs 273 [19.8%]; P = .002), had higher median income ($60 000 to ≥$100 000, 1223 [31.2%] vs 282 [20.5%]; P < .001), and had a higher median level of education (20% to ≥30% with college degree, 1192 [30.4%] vs 333 [24.2%]; P < .001). Progression to GG2 or higher occurred in 2062 patients (38.9%), with a cumulative incidence of 43.2%, and progression to GG3 or higher occurred in 728 patients (13.7%). Fifty-four patients (1.0%) developed metastases. On multivariable analysis, PSAV was significantly associated with progression to GG2 (hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.26-1.39]), GG3 (hazard ratio, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.41-1.62]), and metastases (hazard ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.10-1.74]). Optimal PSAV thresholds that were associated with progression were significantly lower for African American patients (0.44 ng/mL/y) compared with non-Hispanic White patients (1.18 ng/mL/y). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study suggests that PSAV is significantly associated with grade progression among patients with low-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance, but at lower values for African American patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients. These data suggest that serial PSA measures may potentially substitute for multiple prostate biopsies and that African American patients may merit increased frequency of PSA testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler J. Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - Juan Javier-DesLoges
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - Rishi Deka
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - P. Travis Courtney
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - Loren Mell
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - James Murphy
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - J. Kellogg Parsons
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ledet EM, Burgess EF, Sokolova AO, Jaeger EB, Hatton W, Moses M, Miller P, Cotogno P, Layton J, Barata P, Lewis BE, Nakazawa M, Zhu J, Dellinger B, Elrefai S, Nafissi NN, Egan JB, Shore N, McKay RR, Bryce AH, Cheng HH, Antonarakis ES, Sartor O. Comparison of germline mutations in African American and Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate 2021; 81:433-439. [PMID: 33792945 PMCID: PMC8252583 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study is to evaluate germline genetic variants in African American men with metastatic prostate cancer as compared to those in Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer in an effort to understand the role of genetic factors in these populations. METHODS African American and Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer who had germline testing using multigene panels were used to generate comparisons. Germline genetic results, clinical parameters, and family histories between the two populations were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 867 patients were included in this retrospective study, including 188 African American and 669 Caucasian patients. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of a pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) between African American and Caucasian patients (p = .09). African American patients were more likely to have a variant of unknown significance than Caucasians (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95; p < .0001). BRCA1 PV/LPVs were higher in African Americans (OR = 4.86; p = .04). African American patients were less likely to have a PV/LPV in non-BRCA DNA repair genes (OR = 0.30; p = .008). Family history of breast (OR = 2.09; p = .002) or ovarian cancer (OR = 2.33; p = .04) predicted PV/LPVs in Caucasians but not African-Americans. This underscores the limitations of family history in AA men and the importance of personal history to guide germline testing in AA men. CONCLUSIONS In metastatic prostate cancer patients, PV/LPVs of tested genes did not vary by race, BRCA1 PV/LPVs were more common in the African American subset. However, PV/LPVs in non-BRCA DNA repair genes were less likely to be encountered in African Americans. Family history associated with genetic testing results in Caucasians only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa M. Ledet
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Earle F. Burgess
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Alexandra O. Sokolova
- Division of Oncology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Washington Medical Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/VA Puget Sound HCSSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Ellen B. Jaeger
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Whitley Hatton
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Marcus Moses
- School of MedicineTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Patrick Miller
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Patrick Cotogno
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Jodi Layton
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of MedicineTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Brian E. Lewis
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Mari Nakazawa
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jason Zhu
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Beth Dellinger
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Sara Elrefai
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Jan B. Egan
- Center for Individualized MedicineMayo ClinicScottsdaleArizonaUSA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research CenterAtlantic Urology ClinicsMyrtle BeachSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer CenterUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alan H. Bryce
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer CenterMayo ClinicPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Division of Oncology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Washington Medical Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/VA Puget Sound HCSSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Deka R, Parsons JK, Simpson DR, Riviere P, Nalawade V, Vitzthum LK, Kader AK, Kane CJ, Rock CS, Murphy JD, Rose BS. African-American men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in an equal-access health care system: implications for active surveillance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23:581-588. [PMID: 32327702 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0230-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is concern that African-American men (AA) with low-risk prostate cancer may present with more aggressive disease and thus may not be candidates for active surveillance (AS). However, it is uncertain if poorer outcomes are due to disparities in access to medical care rather than true biological differences. METHODS Observational cohort study of patients diagnosed with low-risk PC-Gleason score ≤6, clinical tumor stage ≤2A, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level ≤10-at US Department of Veterans Affairs between January 1, 2001 and October 31, 2015 and treated with radical prostatectomy. Outcomes included upgrading to Gleason Grade Group 2 (GG2), GG ≥ 3, PSA recurrence, pathologic tumor stage ≥3, positive surgical margins, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 2857 men (AA: 835 White: 2022) with a median follow-up of 7.1 years. Overall, there was no significant difference between AA and White men in upgrading to GG ≥ 3 (RR = 1.18, p = 0.43), tumor stage ≥3 (RR = 0.95, p = 0.74), positive surgical margins (RR = 1.14, p = 0.20), PSA recurrence (SHR = 1.26, p = 0.06), and all-cause mortality (SHR = 1.26, p = 0.16). However, there was a significant increase in upgrading for AA to GG2 (RR = 1.49, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in most adverse pathologic outcomes between AA and White patients. However, GG2 upgrading was more common in AA men. The implication is that AA may need to undergo additional evaluation, such as a biopsy MRI, before initiating AS. Whether the increase in GG2 upgrading will lead to poorer long-term clinical outcomes such as metastasis and PCSM also requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Deka
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - J Kellogg Parsons
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Daniel R Simpson
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul Riviere
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - A Karim Kader
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Christopher J Kane
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Chelsea S Rock
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - James D Murphy
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Greenberg JW, Leinwand G, Feibus AH, Haney NM, Krane LS, Thomas R, Sartor O, Silberstein JL. Prospective Observational Study of a Racially Diverse Group of Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. Urology 2020; 148:203-210. [PMID: 33166542 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk upgrading of active surveillance (AS), we reviewed the outcomes of African American men (AA) after electing AS. AS is the standard of care for men with low-grade prostate cancer (PCa). AA are known to have more advanced PCa features and are more likely to die from PCa, thus subsequent disease progression for AA on AS is unclear. METHODS A prospectively maintained AS database from the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Administration Medical Center, New Orleans, Lousiana was queried. We identified men with low- and very low-risk PCa (Gleason 3 + 3, PSA <10, ≤CT2a) who had undergone at least 2 prostate biopsies, including initial diagnostic and subsequent confirmatory prostate biopsies. Descriptive and comparative statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.5.1. RESULTS From a total of 274 men on AS (70% AA), 158 men met inclusion criteria (104 AA [66%]). All patients underwent at least 2 biopsies, and 29% underwent 3 or more biopsies. The median follow-up was 2.7 years. At 3 years on AS protocol, 57% AA and 61% Caucasians demonstrated no evidence of upgrading or treatment. No significant difference was observed between upgrading or progression to treatment when comparing racial groups. Seven (4%) patients in this cohort died from non PCa-specific causes, but no patients demonstrated metastasis or death from PCa over the course of study. CONCLUSION AA men with low-risk PCa can be safely followed with the same AS protocol as non-AA men. Further analysis with longer follow up is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob W Greenberg
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - Gabriel Leinwand
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | | | - Nora M Haney
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - L Spencer Krane
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - Raju Thomas
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA; Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA; Tulane Cancer Center, New Orleans, LA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stolzenbach LF, Rosiello G, Pecoraro A, Palumbo C, Luzzago S, Deuker M, Tian Z, Knipper AS, Pompe R, Zorn KC, Shariat SF, Chun FKH, Graefen M, Saad F, Karakiewicz PI. Prostate Cancer Grade and Stage Misclassification in Active Surveillance Candidates: Black Versus White Patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1492-1499. [PMID: 33152695 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Misclassification rates defined as upgrading, upstaging, and upgrading and/or upstaging have not been tested in contemporary Black patients relative to White patients who fulfilled criteria for very-low-risk, low-risk, or favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This study aimed to address this void. METHODS Within the SEER database (2010-2015), we focused on patients with very low, low, and favorable intermediate risk for prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and had available stage and grade information. Descriptive analyses, temporal trend analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS Overall, 4,704 patients with very low risk (701 Black vs 4,003 White), 17,785 with low risk (2,696 Black vs 15,089 White), and 11,040 with favorable intermediate risk (1,693 Black vs 9,347 White) were identified. Rates of upgrading and/or upstaging in Black versus White patients were respectively 42.1% versus 37.7% (absolute Δ = +4.4%; P<.001) in those with very low risk, 48.6% versus 46.0% (absolute Δ = +2.6%; P<.001) in those with low risk, and 33.8% versus 35.3% (absolute Δ = -1.5%; P=.05) in those with favorable intermediate risk. CONCLUSIONS Rates of misclassification were particularly elevated in patients with very low risk and low risk, regardless of race, and ranged from 33.8% to 48.6%. Recalibration of very-low-, low-, and, to a lesser extent, favorable intermediate-risk active surveillance criteria may be required. Finally, our data indicate that Black patients may be given the same consideration as White patients when active surveillance is an option. However, further validations should ideally follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Franziska Stolzenbach
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,2Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,3Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,4Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,5Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,6Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Deuker
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,7Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anne-Sophie Knipper
- 2Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Raisa Pompe
- 8Department of Urology, Medical University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kevin C Zorn
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- 9Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and.,10Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Felix K H Chun
- 7Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- 2Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Filson CP, Hong F, Xiong N, Pozzar R, Halpenny B, Berry DL. Decision support for men with prostate cancer: Concordance between treatment choice and tumor risk. Cancer 2020; 127:203-208. [PMID: 33119142 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision support tools improve decisional conflict and elicit patient preferences related to prostate cancer treatment. It was hypothesized that men using the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P) would be more likely to pursue guideline-concordant treatment. METHODS Men from a trial assessing the P3P decision support intervention were identified. The primary exposure was allocation to P3P (vs usual care), and the outcome was appropriate treatment per guidelines (eg, low risk = active surveillance). It was assessed whether providers recommended against any treatment options (ie, restricted). A multivariable model was fit for men with low-risk cancer that estimated the odds of the outcome of interest. RESULTS This study identified 295 men in the cohort: 113 (38%) had low-risk disease, 119 (40%) had favorable intermediate-risk disease, and 63 (21%) had unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Among low-risk patients, more men pursued active surveillance after using P3P whether they were given unrestricted (62% vs 54% with usual care; P = .54) or restricted options (71% vs 59% with usual care; P = .34). After adjustments, only Black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.89) and restricted options (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.65) had an inverse association with the receipt of surveillance for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. An impact associated with P3P versus usual care (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.36-2.20) was not observed. CONCLUSIONS Among men in a trial assessing a decision support tool, Black race and restricted treatment options were associated with less use of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Although the P3P instrument ameliorates decisional conflict, its use was not associated with more appropriate alignment of treatment with disease risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Filson
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Winship Cancer Institute, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Urology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Niya Xiong
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Pozzar
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Barbara Halpenny
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donna L Berry
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Percot M, Robert G, Bladou F, Ferrière JM, Bensadoun H, Bernhard JC, Alezra E, Capon G, Sénéchal C, Gourtaud G, Brureau L, Roux V, Blanchet P, Eyraud R. Active surveillance in prostate cancer is possible for Afro-Caribbean population: Comparison of oncological outcomes with a Caucasian cohort. Prog Urol 2020; 30:532-540. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
18
|
Schenk JM, Newcomb LF, Zheng Y, Faino AV, Zhu K, Nyame YA, Brooks JD, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Dash A, Filson CP, Gleave ME, Liss M, Martin FM, Morgan TM, Nelson PS, Thompson IM, Wagner AA, Lin DW. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study. J Urol 2020; 203:727-733. [PMID: 31651227 PMCID: PMC7384451 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In a large, prospective, multi-institutional active surveillance cohort we evaluated whether African American men are at higher risk for reclassification. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Canary PASS (Prostate Active Surveillance Study) is a protocol driven, active surveillance cohort with a prespecified prostate specific antigen and surveillance biopsy regimen. Men included in this study had Gleason Grade Group 1 or 2 disease at diagnosis and fewer than 5 years between diagnosis and enrollment, and had undergone 1 or more surveillance biopsies. The reclassification risk, defined as an increase in the Gleason score on subsequent biopsy, was compared between African American and Caucasian American men using Cox proportional hazards models. In the subset of men who underwent delayed prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathology findings, defined as pT3a or greater disease, or Gleason Grade Group 3 or greater, was compared in African American and Caucasian American men. RESULTS Of the 1,315 men 89 (7%) were African American and 1,226 (93%) were Caucasian American. There was no difference in the treatment rate in African American and Caucasian American men. In multivariate models African American race was not associated with the risk of reclassification (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.78-1.72). Of the 441 men who underwent prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance the rate of adverse pathology was similar in those who were African American and Caucasian American (46% vs 47%, p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS Of men on active surveillance who followed a standardized protocol of regular prostate specific antigen testing and biopsy those who were African American were not at increased risk for pathological reclassification while on active surveillance, or for adverse pathology findings at prostatectomy. Active surveillance appears to be an appropriate management strategy for African American men with favorable risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa F Newcomb
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yingye Zheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Anna V Faino
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Kehao Zhu
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Yaw A Nyame
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Peter R Carroll
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Atreya Dash
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Martin E Gleave
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael Liss
- University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | | | - Peter S Nelson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Ian M Thompson
- Christus Santa Rosa Hospital Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Daniel W Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen S, Xiao Y, Wang X. Re: Brandon A. Mahal, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Daniel E. Spratt, et al. Prostate Cancer Genomic-risk Differences Between African-American and White Men Across Gleason Scores. Eur Urol 2019;75:1038–40. Eur Urol 2020; 77:e66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
20
|
Das H, Rodriguez R. Health Care Disparities in Urologic Oncology: A Systematic Review. Urology 2020; 136:9-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
21
|
Mygatt JG, Cullen J, Streicher SA, Kuo HC, Chen Y, Young D, Gesztes W, Williams G, Conti G, Porter C, Stroup SP, Rice KR, Rosner IL, Burke A, Sesterhenn I. Race, tumor location, and disease progression among low-risk prostate cancer patients. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2235-2242. [PMID: 31965751 PMCID: PMC7064097 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The relationship between race, prostate tumor location, and BCR‐free survival is inconclusive. This study examined the independent and joint roles of patient race and tumor location on biochemical recurrence‐free (BCR) survival. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among men with newly diagnosed, biopsy‐confirmed, NCCN‐defined low risk CaP who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center from 1996 to 2008. BCR‐free survival was modeled using Kaplan‐Meier estimation curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards (PH) analyses. Results There were 539 eligible patients with low‐risk CaP (25% African American, AA; 75% Caucasian American, CA). Median age at CaP diagnosis and post‐RP follow‐up time was 59.2 and 8.1 years, respectively. Kaplan‐Meier analyses showed no significant association between race (P = .52) or predominant tumor location (P = .98) on BCR‐free survival. In Cox PH multivariable analysis, neither race (HR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.68‐2.02; P = .56) nor predominant tumor location (HR = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.59‐2.15; P = .71) was an independent predictor of BCR‐free survival. Conclusions Neither race nor predominant tumor location was associated with adverse oncologic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin G Mygatt
- Urology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Samantha A Streicher
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Huai-Ching Kuo
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Yongmei Chen
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Denise Young
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Galen Conti
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Porter
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sean P Stroup
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kevin R Rice
- Urology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Inger L Rosner
- Urology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Allen Burke
- Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Active surveillance (AS), now the standard of care for most men with favourable-risk prostate cancer, is appealing for selected men with 'favourable' intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS This is a review of the indications for conservative management in this population, the outcomes reported in prospective series, and the use of molecular biomarkers and imaging to identify optimal candidates. RESULTS Candidates are those patients who are categorized as having intermediate-risk disease either because of a prostate-specific antigen level between 10 and 20 ng/mL, or by virtue of having Grade Group 2 disease, with a small percentage of Gleason 4 pattern, and a negative magnetic resonance imaging result or negative targeted biopsy of a region of interest. Confirmation with a favourable score on a tissue-based genetic assay can provide further reassurance. A subset of patients with intermediate-risk disease has indolent disease that may benefit from AS; at the same time, some patients with intermediate-risk disease have an aggressive clinical course that requires early definitive therapy. This heterogeneity is not adequately captured with traditional histopathological staging. Clinical, genomic and radiological biomarkers are the key to appropriate risk stratification and patient selection. CONCLUSIONS The benefits of AS make it an appealing option for selected patients with intermediate-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Macura KJ, Simopoulos DN, Carter HB, Gorin MA. Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort. Eur Urol 2020; 77:675-682. [PMID: 31918957 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is the preferred management option for most men with grade group (GG) 1 prostate cancer (PCa). Questions persist regarding long-term outcomes and the optimal approach to AS. OBJECTIVE To determine survival and metastatic outcomes in AS patients. Secondary objectives were to measure the cumulative incidence and association of patient-level factors on biopsy grade reclassification. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective, active, open-enrollment cohort study was conducted from 1995 through July 2018 at a tertiary-care academic institution. Patients with very-low-risk or low-risk PCa were enrolled. INTERVENTION AS with semiannual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination, serial prostate biopsy, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The 10- and 15-yr cumulative incidences of primary and secondary outcomes were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 1818 men were monitored on AS for a median of 5.0yr (interquartile range 2.0-9.0). There were 88 non-PCa deaths, four PCa deaths, and one additional case of metastasis. The cumulative incidence of PCa-specific mortality or metastasis was 0.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.6%) at both 10 and 15yr. The 5-, 10-, and 15-yr cumulative incidences of biopsy grade reclassification were 21%, 30%, and 32%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, biopsy grade reclassification was associated with older age, African-American race, PSA density, and increased cancer volume on biopsy, and men who underwent mpMRI prior to enrollment were less likely to undergo grade reclassification. Our selection and monitoring are more stringent than many other contemporary AS programs. CONCLUSIONS In a large, single-institution, prospective AS cohort, the risk of cancer death or metastasis was <1% over long-term follow-up. Consistent with clinical guidelines, these data support the use of AS for the management of most men diagnosed with GG1 PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY This study investigated long-term outcomes in patients with grade group 1 prostate cancer managed with active surveillance (AS). Ten years after enrolling in AS, the risk of metastasis or death from prostate cancer was <1%, while 48% of men switched to treatment. Patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/ultrasound-fusion targeted biopsy prior to enrollment were less likely to experience biopsy grade reclassification during follow-up, suggesting a role for mpMRI as part of a comprehensive risk assessment to confirm AS eligibility. These findings support the safety of AS in most men with grade group 1 prostate cancer, but specific outcomes may differ in programs with less intensive monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Tosoian
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mufaddal Mamawala
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Jonathan I Epstein
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Patricia Landis
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Katarzyna J Macura
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Demetrios N Simopoulos
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - H Ballentine Carter
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael A Gorin
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Badal S, Aiken W, Morrison B, Valentine H, Bryan S, Gachi A, Ragin C. Disparities in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates: Solvable or not? Prostate 2020; 80:3-16. [PMID: 31702061 PMCID: PMC8378246 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is recognized as a disease possessing not only great variation in its geographic and racial distribution but also tremendous variation in its potential to cause morbidity and death and it, therefore, ought not to be considered a homogenous disease entity. Morbidity and death from PCa are disproportionately higher in men of African ancestry (MAA) who are generally observed to have more aggressive disease and worse outcomes following treatment compared to men of European ancestry (MEA). The higher rates of PCa among MAA relative to MEA appear to be multifactorial and related to inherent differences in biological aggressiveness; a continued lack of awareness of the disease and methods of prevention; a lower prevalence of screen-detected PCa; comparatively lower access to quality healthcare as well as systemic and institutionalized disparities in the administration of optimal care to MAA in developed countries such as the United States of America where high-quality care is available. Even when access to quality healthcare is assured in equal access settings, it appears that MAA still have worse outcomes after PCa treatment stage-for-stage and grade-for-grade compared to MEA, suggesting that, inherent racial, ethnic and biological differences are paramount in predicting poor outcomes. This review has explored the different contributing factors to the current disparities in PCa incidence and mortality rates with emphasis on the incongruence in how research has been conducted in understanding the disease towards developing therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Badal
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - William Aiken
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - Belinda Morrison
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - Henkel Valentine
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - Sophia Bryan
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - Andrew Gachi
- Department of pathology, Aga Khan University Hospital, 3 Avenue, Parklands, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Camille Ragin
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- African Caribbean Cancer Consortium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Morrison BF, Aiken WD, Reid G, Mayhew R, Hanchard B. Pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Jamaican men with low-risk prostate cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2019; 13:971. [PMID: 31921342 PMCID: PMC6834384 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Several studies suggest race-based health disparities in men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), with African American males having poorer oncological outcomes. We sought to determine the prevalence and predictors of pathological upgrading and upstaging in Jamaican men with low-risk PCa treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Data on 141 men who met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for low-risk PCa and underwent RP at a single institution were reviewed. All men had a transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Pre-operative clinical and final pathological data were obtained. Data were summarised as means and standard deviations or percentages as appropriate. Bivariate analyses such as independent samples t-tests and chi-square tables were conducted and logistic regression models were estimated to predict upgrading (>Gleason 6) and upstaging (p ≥ T3). The mean age was 59.5 ± 7.8 years with mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 6.6 ± 2 ng/mL. A total of 48.3% of men were upgraded and 11.4% were upstaged. Bivariate analyses indicated that PSA (p = 0.008) and percentage positive cores (p = 0.002) were associated with upgrading. PSA (p = 0.042) and percentage positive cores (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with upstaging. The odds of upgrading increased with increased PSA levels (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05-1.87, p = 0.021) or increased percentage positive cores (OR 8.27, 95% CI 2.19-31.16, p = 0.002). The odds of upstaging increased with increased PSA levels (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.01-1.96, p = 0.046) and with increased percentages positive cores (OR 11.4; 95% CI 2.06-63.09, p = 0.005). Jamaican men with low-risk PCa are at high risk of pathological upgrading and upstaging at RP. These findings should be taken into consideration when discussing treatment options with these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gareth Reid
- University of the West Indies, Mona PO, Kingston 7, Jamaica
| | - Richard Mayhew
- University of the West Indies, Mona PO, Kingston 7, Jamaica
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aminsharifi A, Schulman A, Howard LE, Tay KJ, Amling CL, Aronson WJ, Cooperberg MR, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Freedland SJ, Polascik TJ. Influence of African American race on the association between preoperative biopsy grade group and adverse histopathologic features of radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2019; 125:3025-3032. [PMID: 31042315 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was performed to evaluate the influence of race on the association between biopsy grade group (GrGp) and the risk of detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and adverse histopathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS Data regarding 4073 men (1344 African American men; 33%) who were treated with RP were categorized based on the 5-tiered GrGp system. Logistic regression was used to test the association between biopsy GrGp and PSA nadir (<0.1 ng/mL) after RP as well as adverse pathological features among all patients and stratified by race. RESULTS Those patients with a higher biopsy GrGp were found to have lower odds of achieving a PSA nadir <0.1 ng/mL after RP on unadjusted and multivariable analysis (both P < .001). On unadjusted and multivariable analysis, higher GrGp was associated with increased odds of each of the adverse pathological features, namely, GrGp ≥3, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, positive surgical resection margin, and positive lymph nodes (all P < .001). Race had no significant interaction with biopsy GrGp in the prediction of PSA nadir after RP (P = .91) or any adverse pathological features (all P > .06) except positive lymph nodes. When the models were stratified by race, the associations between preoperative biopsy GrGp and having a PSA nadir <0.1 ng/mL, high-grade final pathology, or other adverse histopathologic features were similar in both races except as noted for positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS Higher preoperative biopsy GrGp is associated with increased odds of adverse histopathological findings as well as lower odds of a PSA nadir <0.1 ng/mL after RP. These associations are largely independent of race, suggesting that GrGp is an accurate tool for risk stratification in both black and white men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Aminsharifi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Urology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ariel Schulman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lauren E Howard
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- SingHealth, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Christopher L Amling
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon
| | - William J Aronson
- Department of Urology, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Christopher J Kane
- Department of Urology, University of California at San Diego Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
| | - Martha K Terris
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Active surveillance is becoming more widely accepted as an initial management option for carefully selected men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). As prospective active surveillance cohorts mature sufficiently to begin evaluating longer-term outcomes, consensus on more precise evidence-based guidelines is needed to identify the patient cohorts who may be safely managed with active surveillance and what the ideal surveillance protocol entails. RECENT FINDINGS Long-term outcomes updates have suggested a trend toward worse 15-year survival outcomes for intermediate-risk patients on active surveillance compared with definitive treatment, but 'intermediate-risk' is a broad category and there is a subset of favorable intermediate-risk patients for whom survival outcomes remain equivalent. Promising updates to current risk stratification include consideration of genomic classifiers, advanced imaging and more nuanced interpretation of biopsy results. SUMMARY Despite widespread acknowledgement of the pitfalls of overtreatment in clinically localized PCa, utilization of active surveillance in the intermediate-risk population remains marginal, in part due to the absence of easily interpretable consensus recommendations. As more long-term outcomes data become available for this subgroup, the field is now poised to refine the definition of favorable intermediate-risk patients for whom active surveillance is a safe, evidence-based first-line management option.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bloom JB, Lebastchi AH, Gold SA, Hale GR, Sanford T, Mehralivand S, Ahdoot M, Rayn KN, Czarniecki M, Smith C, Valera V, Wood BJ, Merino MJ, Choyke PL, Parnes HL, Turkbey B, Pinto PA. Use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion-guided biopsies to properly select and follow African-American men on active surveillance. BJU Int 2019; 124:768-774. [PMID: 31141307 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the rate of Gleason Grade Group (GGG) upgrading in African-American (AA) men with a prior diagnosis of low-grade prostate cancer (GGG 1 or GGG 2) on 12-core systematic biopsy (SB) after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and fusion biopsy (FB); and whether AA men who continued active surveillance (AS) after mpMRI and FB fared differently than a predominantly Caucasian (non-AA) population. PATIENTS AND METHODS A database of men who had undergone mpMRI and FB was queried to determine rates of upgrading by FB amongst men deemed to be AS candidates based on SB prior to referral. After FB, Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for AA men and non-AA men who then elected AS. The time to GGG upgrading and time continuing AS were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS AA men referred with GGG 1 disease on previous SB were upgraded to GGG ≥3 by FB more often than non-AA men, 22.2% vs 12.7% (P = 0.01). A total of 32 AA men and 258 non-AA men then continued AS, with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 39.19 (24.24-56.41) months. The median time to progression was 59.7 and 60.5 months, respectively (P = 0.26). The median time continuing AS was 61.9 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS AA men were more likely to be upgraded from GGG 1 on SB to GGG ≥3 on initial FB; however, AA and non-AA men on AS subsequently progressed at similar rates following mpMRI and FB. A greater tendency for SB to underestimate tumour grade in AA men may explain prior studies that have shown AA men to be at higher risk of progression during AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuel A Gold
- Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Graham R Hale
- Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas Sanford
- Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Molecular Imaging Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sherif Mehralivand
- Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Molecular Imaging Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Kareem N Rayn
- Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Clayton Smith
- Molecular Imaging Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Bradford J Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Center for Interventional Oncology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kamel MH, Bimali M, Khalil MI, Eltahawy E, Su LJ, Bissada NK, Davis R. Regional trends in average years of potential life lost (AYPLL) secondary to prostate cancer deaths among Caucasians and African Americans treated by surgery or radiation. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51:561-569. [PMID: 30840195 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02116-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study regional trends in average years of potential life lost (AYPLL) among Caucasians (CA) and African Americans (AA) with prostate cancer (Pca) who received radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy among four different regions in the US as well as across different tumor grades. Years of potential life lost is defined as the difference between a predetermined end-point age and the age at death for a death that occurred prior to that end age, hence the AYPLL is calculated by dividing the total YPLL by the total number of patients died. METHODS The surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database was used to identify Pca patients who were CA or AA and who have received radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Study duration was divided into four decades; 1973-1982 (D1), 1983-1992 (D2), 1993-2002 (D3), 2003-2012 (D4). Examined regions were; North East (NE), North central (NC), South and West. Tumor grade was classified into; well/moderately differentiated (WD/MD) and poorly/undifferentiated (PD/UD) groups. Differences in AYPLL among CA and AA in each of these variables were compared. RESULTS Overall, compared to CA, AA were diagnosed and died earlier from Pca. AA had higher AYPLL to Pca than CA. In both tumor grade groups, progressive increase in AYPLL among AA compared to CA was noted over the last three decades. In the WD/MD group, except for the South region, the highest recorded difference in AYPLL between AA and CA was in D4. In the PD/UD group, a similar difference in AYPLL between AA and CA was noted in all regions. The difference in AYPLL was higher in the PD/UD group than the WD/MD group. CONCLUSIONS Racial disparity between AA and CA existed across the examined regions. It is more pronounced in advanced tumor grades. The differences were more significant in the last decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed H Kamel
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. .,Department of Urology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Milan Bimali
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Mahmoud I Khalil
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.,Department of Urology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ehab Eltahawy
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.,Department of Urology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - LJoseph Su
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Nabil K Bissada
- Department of Urology, Baylor School of Medicine and Michael E. De Bakey VA Medical center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodney Davis
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Leinwand GZ, Gabrielson AT, Krane LS, Silberstein JL. Rethinking active surveillance for prostate cancer in African American men. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:S397-S410. [PMID: 30363480 PMCID: PMC6178310 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.06.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) is a treatment modality for prostate cancer that aims to simultaneously avoid overtreatment and allow for the timely intervention of localized disease. AS has become the de facto standard of care for most men with low-risk prostate cancer. However, few African American (AA) men were included in the prospective observational cohorts that resulted in a paradigm shift in treatment recommendations from active intervention toward AS. It has been established that AA men have an increased prostate cancer incidence, higher baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, more aggressive prostate cancer features, greater frequency of biochemical recurrence after treatment, and higher overall cancer-specific mortality compared to their Caucasian counterparts. As such, this has given many physicians pause before initiating AS for AA patients. In the following manuscript, we will review the available literature regarding AS, with a particular focus on AA men. The preponderance of evidence demonstrates that AS is as viable a management method for AA with low-risk prostate cancer as it is with other racial groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Z Leinwand
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Andrew T Gabrielson
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Louis S Krane
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2018. Eur Urol 2018; 74:357-368. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
32
|
Wallace TJ, Qian J, Avital I, Bay C, Man YG, Wellman LL, Moskaluk C, Troyer D, Ramnani D, Stojadinovic A. Technical Feasibility of Tissue Microarray (TMA) Analysis of Tumor-Associated Immune Response in Prostate Cancer. J Cancer 2018; 9:2191-2202. [PMID: 29937939 PMCID: PMC6010688 DOI: 10.7150/jca.22846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The androgen receptor (AR) regulates immune-related epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis. Primary tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) [CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ TILs] are potential prognostic indicators in PCa, and variations may contribute to racial disparities in tumor biology and PCa outcomes. Aim: To assess the technical feasibility of tumor microarray (TMA)-based methods to perform multi-marker TIL profiling in primary resected PCa. Methods: Paraffin-embedded tissue cores of histopathologically-confirmed primary PCa (n = 40; 1 TMA tissue specimen loss) were arrayed in triplicate on TMAs. Expression profiles of AR, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ TILs in normal prostate, and the center and periphery of both the tumor-dominant nodule and highest Gleason grade were detected by IHC and associated with clinical and pathological data using standard statistical methodology. An independent pathologist, blinded to the clinical data, scored all samples (percent and intensity of positive cells). Results: TMAs were constructed from 21 (53.8%) Black and 18 (46.2%) White males with completely-resected, primarily pT2 stage PCa [pT2a (n = 3; 7.7%); pT2b (n = 2; 5.1%); pT2c (n = 27; 69.2%); pT3a (n = 5; 12.8%); mean pre-op PSA = 8.17 ng/ml]. The CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD8/CD3 cellular protein expression differed from normal in the periphery of the dominant nodule, the center of the highest Gleason grade, and the periphery of the highest Gleason grade (P < 0.05). Correlations between TIL expression in the center and periphery of the dominant nodule, with corresponding center and periphery of the highest Gleason grade, respectively, were robust, and the magnitude of these correlations differed markedly by race (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Multi-marker (AR, CD3, CD4, CD8) profiling with IHC analysis of TMAs consisting of primary, non-metastatic resected prostate cancer is technically feasible in this pilot study. Future studies will evaluate primary tumor immunoscore using semi-quantitative, IHC-based methodology to assess differences in the spectrum, quantity, and/or localization of TILs, and to gain insights into racial disparities in PCa tumor biology and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Junqi Qian
- Virginia Urology, Richmond, Virginia, U.S.A
| | - Itzhak Avital
- Soroka University Center for Advanced Cancer Care, Ber Sheva, Israel
| | - Curt Bay
- A.T. Still University, Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A
| | - Yan-Gao Man
- National Medical Centre of Colorectal Disease, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Nanjing, China
| | | | - Chris Moskaluk
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.A
| | - Dean Troyer
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jiang S, Narayan V, Warlick C. Racial disparities and considerations for active surveillance of prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:214-220. [PMID: 29732279 PMCID: PMC5911544 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.09.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) for the management of low-risk prostate cancer has been increasing and in the general population appears safe, allowing for a reduction in the harms of prostate cancer screening such as overtreatment. African-American (AA) men have overall worse outcomes from prostate cancer compared to Caucasian-American (CA) men for a variety of socioeconomic, cultural and possibly biologic reasons, thus complicating the use of AS in this population. Strategies for optimizing care and mitigating risk in this population include pursuing close surveillance with steadfast patient compliance, the use of multiparametric MRI with targeted biopsies including the anterior prostate to reduce the risk of undersampling, as well as a judicious and thoughtful incorporation of novel molecular biomarkers for risk stratification. Currently, there exists no direct data to suggest that AS cannot be safely carried out in AA men following an informed discussion and after engaging in shared decision making. Physicians should have a low threshold for consideration of definitive therapy. Additional efforts should be made in increasing the engagement of minority participants in clinical trials, to gain an improved representation of underserved populations in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Jiang
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Vikram Narayan
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Active Surveillance in African-Americans. Prostate Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78646-9_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
|
35
|
Osterberg EC, Palmer NR, Harris CR, Murphy GP, Blaschko SD, Chu C, Allen IE, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Breyer BN. Outcomes of men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer at a safety-net hospital. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:663.e9-663.e14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
36
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to examine prostate cancer racial disparities specific to the African-American population. RECENT FINDINGS African-American men are more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer, present at an earlier age; are more likely to have locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis; and have suboptimal outcomes to standard treatments. Prostate cancer treatment requires a nuanced approach, particularly when applying screening, counseling, and management of African-American men. Oncological as well as functional outcomes may differ and are potentially due to a combination of genetic, molecular, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary L Smith
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 6038, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| | - Scott E Eggener
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 6038, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Tarry Building Room 16-703, 300 E. Superior Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Active surveillance is now widely utilized for the management of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The limits of surveillance for men with intermediate risk cancer are controversial. While there is a broad consensus that men with low-risk disease can be safely managed with AS, many potential candidates, including those with Gleason 3 + 4 disease, PSA >10, younger men and African-Americans are often excluded. RECENT FINDINGS Outcome data for intermediate-risk patients managed by active surveillance demonstrate reasonable outcomes, but these men clearly are at higher risk for progression to metastatic disease. The use of biomarkers and multiparametric MRI will enable a more precise and personalized risk assessment. Literature describing the effects of young age on outcomes is limited, but the experience reported in prospective series with 15-20 year follow-up suggests it is a safe approach. African-American men are at greater risk for occult co-existent higher-grade disease, but in the absence of this their outcome is favorable. Patients with intermediate-risk PCa should not be excluded from active surveillance based on a single criterion. Treatment decisions should be based on multiple parameters, including percent Gleason 4, PSA density, cancer volume on biopsy, MRI findings, and patient age and co-morbidity. Genetic tissue-based biomarkers are also likely to play a role in enhancing decision making.
Collapse
|
38
|
Boehm K, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Rosenbaum C, Brandi LS, Budäus L, Graefen M, Huland H, Haferkamp A, Tilki D. Impact of preoperative risk on metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2017; 120:666-672. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Boehm
- Martini-Klinik; Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg
- Department of Urology; University Medical Centre; Johannes Gutenberg University; Mainz
| | - Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah
- Martini-Klinik; Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg
- Department of Urology; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Clemens Rosenbaum
- Department of Urology; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Laurenz S. Brandi
- Martini-Klinik; Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Klinik; Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik; Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik; Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology; University Medical Centre; Johannes Gutenberg University; Mainz
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik; Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg
- Department of Urology; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Parsons JK, Pierce JP, Mohler J, Paskett E, Jung SH, Morris MJ, Small E, Hahn O, Humphrey P, Taylor J, Marshall J. Men's Eating and Living (MEAL) study (CALGB 70807 [Alliance]): recruitment feasibility and baseline demographics of a randomized trial of diet in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2017; 121:534-539. [PMID: 28437029 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of performing national, randomized trials of dietary interventions for localized prostate cancer. METHODS The Men's Eating and Living (MEAL) study (CALGB 70807 [Alliance]) is a phase III clinical trial testing the efficacy of a high-vegetable diet to prevent progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS). Participants were randomized to a validated diet counselling intervention or to a control condition. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis analyses were used to assess between-group differences at baseline. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2015, 478 (103%) of a targeted 464 patients were randomized at 91 study sites. At baseline, the mean (sd) age was 64 (6) years and mean (sd) PSA concentration was 4.9 (2.1) ng/mL. Fifty-six (12%) participants were African-American, 17 (4%) were Hispanic/Latino, and 16 (3%) were Asian-American. There were no significant between-group differences for age (P = 0.98), race/ethnicity (P = 0.52), geographic region (P = 0.60), time since prostate cancer diagnosis (P = 0.85), PSA concentration (P = 0.96), clinical stage (T1c or T2a; P = 0.27), or Gleason sum (Gleason 6 or 3+4 = 7; P = 0.76). In a pre-planned analysis, the baseline prostate biopsy samples of the first 50 participants underwent central pathology review to confirm eligibility, with an expectation that <10% would become ineligible. One of 50 participants (2%) became ineligible. CONCLUSION The MEAL study shows the feasibility of implementing national, multi-institutional phase III clinical trials of diet for prostate cancer and of testing interventions to prevent disease progression in AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kellogg Parsons
- Division of Urologic Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Comprehensive Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, La Jolla, CA, USA.,VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - John P Pierce
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - James Mohler
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Electra Paskett
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sin-Ho Jung
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Olwen Hahn
- Alliance Central Protocol Operations, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter Humphrey
- Department of Pathology, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - John Taylor
- Department of Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - James Marshall
- Department of Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Gökce MI, Sundi D, Schaeffer E, Pettaway C. Is active surveillance a suitable option for African American men with prostate cancer? A systemic literature review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 20:127-136. [DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2016] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 09/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|