Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Screening by 5α-Reductase Inhibitor Use

Prostate cancer incidence in men with prostate-specific antigen below 3 ng/mL: The Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) can reduce PCa mortality, but also involves overdetection of low-risk disease with potential adverse effects. We evaluated PCa incidence among men with PSA below 3 ng/mL and no PCa diagnosis at the first screening round of the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for PCa. Follow-up started at the first screening attendance and ended at PCa diagnosis, emigration, death or the common closing date (December 2016), whichever came first. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios and their confidence intervals (CI). Among men with PSA <3 ng/mL, cumulative PCa incidence was 9.1% after 17.6 years median follow-up. Cumulative incidence was 3.6% among men with baseline PSA 0 to 0.99 ng/mL, 11.5% in those with PSA 1.0 to 1.99 ng/mL and 25.7% among men with PSA 2 to 2.99 ng/mL (hazard ratio 9.0, 95% CI: 7.9-10.2 for the latter). The differences by PSA level were most striking for low-risk disease based on Gleason score and EAU risk group. PSA values <1 ng/mL indicate a very low 20-year risk, while at PSA 2 to 2.99 ng/mL risks are materially higher, with 4- to 5-fold risk for aggressive disease. Using risk-stratification and appropriate rescreening intervals will reduce screening intensity and overdetection. Using cumulative incidence of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as the criterion, rescreening intervals could range from approximately 3 years for men with initial PSA 2 to 2.99 ng/mL, 6 years for men with PSA 1 to 1.99 ng/mL to 10 years for men with PSA <1 ng/mL.

Association of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis

Background

5-Alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) have been suggested as potential chemopreventive agents for prostate cancer (PCa). This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of 5-ARIs on the incidence and mortality of PCa.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched comprehensively from database inception to October 2019. The clinical outcomes included the incidence of overall PCa, high-grade (Gleason8-10) PCa, metastatic PCa, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

Overall, 23 studies were included in the present study, representing 11 cohort studies, 5 case-control studies, and 8 randomized controlled trials. The use of 5-ARIs was associated with a decreased risk of overall PCa [relative risk (RR) =0.77; 95% CI: 0.67–0.88; P<0.001] and increased risk of Gleason 8–10 PCa (RR=1.19; 95% CI: 1.01–1.40; P=0.036). In terms of metastatic PCa, there were no significant between-group differences (RR=1.23; 95% CI: 0.69–2.18; P=0.487). Furthermore, we found that prediagnostic 5-ARI usage was not associated with an increased risk of overall or prostate cancer mortality, with HRs of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.92–1.08; P=0.938) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.80–1.21; P=0.881), respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion, while male 5-ARI users were associated with a decreased risk of overall prostate cancer and increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason 8–10), they were not associated with an increased risk of overall or prostate cancer mortality. 5-ARIs should be recommended carefully for use as chemopreventive agents.

The impact of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors on mortality in a prostate cancer chemoprevention setting: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the impact of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARI) for prostate cancer (PCa) primary prevention on specific and overall mortality (primary outcomes), the incidence of PCa diagnosis and disease aggressiveness (secondary outcomes).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials and BVS through April 2018 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) and cohort studies (CS). We included articles with data on mortality or PCa incidence for men using 5ARI previously to PCa diagnosis.

RESULTS

Regarding the included studies, nine had data on mortality, 16 on PCa incidence and 12 on Gleason scores (GS). We found that the use of 5ARI had no impact on overall mortality (RR 0.93 95% CI 0.78-1.11) and PCa-related mortality (RR 1.35 95% CI 0.50-3.94), nor on high-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 1.06 95% CI 0.72-1.56). We identified a relative risk reduction of 24% in moderate-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.59-0.98) and low-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.59-0.97) Also, a reduction of 26% in overall PCa diagnosis was observed in the RCT subgroup analysis (RR 0.74 95% CI 0.65-0.84).

CONCLUSION

5ARI significantly reduced the risk of being diagnosed with PCa, not increasing high-grade disease, overall or cancer-specific mortality. Due to the relatively short mean follow-up of most studies, the mortality analysis is limited.