Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report on Outcomes of Surgery and Active Surveillance in Patients Retrospectively Identified on Pretreatment Imaging

Cystic Features in Renal Epithelial Neoplasms and Their Increasing Clinical and Pathologic Significance

Most cystic renal tumors after resection (Boniak IIF to IV cysts) have an indolent course despite the significantly higher proportion of malignant [ie, renal cell carcinoma (RCC)] diagnosis. Most cystic renal tumors have clear cell histology that include cystic clear cell RCC and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCNLMP). There is growing evidence to suggest that MCNLMP, cystic clear cell RCC, and noncystic clear cell RCC form a cystic-to-solid biological spectrum with MCNLMP representing the most indolent form and with cystic clear cell RCC behaving better than noncystic (solid) clear cell RCC. Extensively (>75%) cystic clear cell RCC also has an excellent outcome similar to MCNLMP stressing the need to reevaluate the histologic criteria that separate these 2 cystic clear cell tumors. Other tumors with clear cells that can be extensively cystic such as the recently reclassified noncancerous clear cell papillary renal tumor and the newly described MED15::TFE3 RCC also have indolent course and may mimic MCNLMP. Cystic features occur also in renal tumors with nonclear cell histology including tumors capable of metastasis such as acquired cystic disease-associated, tubulocystic, fumarate hydratase-deficient, and eosinophilic solid and cystic RCCs. Cystic imaging presentation of some renal tumors such as papillary RCC can be attributed in part to pseudocystic necrosis and hemorrhage. It is important to know that tubulocystic RCC may have a lower Bosniak class presentation that overlaps with benign renal cysts (Bosniak I to IIF) that are managed conservatively. This review highlights the cystic renal tumors with clear cell and nonclear cell morphologies including some novel RCC subtypes that may have cystic features. The presence of cystic features and their extent may aid in the classification and prognostication of renal neoplasms underscoring its increasing importance in the pathologic diagnosis and reporting of renal neoplasia.

Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics

Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.

Comparison of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cystic renal cell carcinoma: a SEER-based and retrospective study

Cystic renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) is uncommon and surgical indication remains controversial. We compared radical nephrectomy (RN) with partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with cRCC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and a retrospective cohort including 106 cRCC patients hospitalized in Ruijin and Renji Hospitals from 2013 to 2022. The baseline characteristics between RN and PN groups in both cohorts were adjusted by propensity score-matching (PSM). A total of 640 patients were included in the SEER cohort. Before PSM, PN group in the SEER cohort had a lower level of T stage (p < 0.001) and comprised more Caucasians (p < 0.001). After PSM, RN was associated with worse overall survival (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.006) in contrast to PN. In the Chinese cohort, 86 patients who underwent PN and 20 patients who underwent RN were finally included. The mean proportions of estimated glomerular filtration rate preserved after RN were worse than PN. Therefore, PN should be preferred in cRCC patients.

CT-based Bosniak classification of cystic renal lesions: is version 2019 an improvement on version 2005?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of the CT-based v2019 versus v2005 Bosniak classification systems for risk stratification of cystic renal lesions (CRL).

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients with CRL identified on CT scan between 2005 and 2018. The reference standard was histopathology or a minimum 4-year imaging follow-up. The studies were reviewed independently by five readers (three senior, two junior), blinded to pathology results and imaging follow-up, who assigned Bosniak categories based on the 2005 and 2019 versions. Diagnostic performance of v2005 and v2019 Bosniak classifications for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions was calculated by dichotomizing CRL into the potential for ablative therapy (III-IV) or conservative management (I-IIF). Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Light's Kappa.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients with 149 CRL (33 malignant) were included. v2005 and v2019 Bosniak classifications achieved similar diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 91% vs 91% and a specificity of 89% vs 88%, respectively. Inter-reader agreement for overall Bosniak category assignment was substantial for v2005 (κ = 0.78) and v2019 (κ = 0.75) between senior readers but decreased for v2019 when the Bosniak classification was dichotomized to conservative management (I-IIF) or ablative therapy (III-IV) (0.80 vs 0.71, respectively). For v2019, wall thickness was the morphological feature with the poorest inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.43 and 0.18 for senior and junior readers, respectively).

CONCLUSION

No significant improvement in diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement was shown between v2005 and v2019. The observed decrease in inter-reader agreement in v2019 when dichotomized according to management strategy may reflect the more stringent morphological criteria.

KEY POINTS

• Versions 2005 and 2019 Bosniak classifications achieved similar diagnostic performance, but the specificity of higher risk categories (III and IV) was not increased while one malignant lesion was downgraded to v2019 Bosniak category II (i.e., not subjected to further follow-up). • Inter-reader agreement was similar between v2005 and v2019 but moderately decreased for v2019 when the Bosniak classification was dichotomized according to the potential need for ablative therapies (I-II-IIF vs III-IV).

Diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification, version 2019 for cystic renal masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To systematically assess the diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification, version 2019 for risk stratification of cystic renal masses.

Methods

We conducted an electronic literature search on Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify relevant articles between June 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022 that used the Bosniak classification, version 2019 for risk stratification of cystic renal masses. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled with the bivariate model and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Results

A total of eight studies comprising 720 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.90) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.58–0.76), respectively, for the class III/IV threshold, with a calculated area under the HSROC curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81–0.87). The pooled LR+, LR−, and DOR were 2.62 (95% CI 2.0–3.44), 0.22 (95% CI 0.16–0.32), and 11.7 (95% CI 6.8–20.0), respectively. The Higgins I² statistics demonstrated substantial heterogeneity across studies, with an I² of 57.8% for sensitivity and an I² of 74.6% for specificity. In subgroup analyses, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for CT were 0.86 and 0.71, respectively, and those for MRI were 0.87 and 0.67, respectively. In five studies providing a head-to-head comparison between the two versions of the Bosniak classification, the 2019 version demonstrated significantly higher specificity (0.62 vs. 0.41, p < 0.001); however, it came at the cost of a significant decrease in sensitivity (0.88 vs. 0.94, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The Bosniak classification, version 2019 demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity, and there was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between CT and MRI. Compared to version 2005, the Bosniak classification, version 2019 has the potential to significantly reduce overtreatment, but at the cost of a substantial decline in sensitivity.

Comparison of survival between unilocular cystic and purely solid renal cell carcinoma

To evaluate clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of unilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma (ucRCC) compared with purely solid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC), and to evaluate the oncologic aggressiveness of ucRCC. The relevant data of 957 patients with sporadic unilateral renal cell carcinoma (RCC) underwent surgical treatment in 2 institutions from Jan 2014 to Oct 2018 were obtained. We excluded multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP), RCC with multilocular cysts and necrotic RCC. 74 ucRCCs were identified by pathology reports. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and eventually selected 144 sRCCs. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were compared properly. After PSM, age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and postoperative Chronic Kidney Disease grade were not significantly different. Both overall survival and progression-free survival of ucRCC were significantly better than sRCC by the log-rank test. Twenty-five cases of sRCCs were in the pT3 or pT4 stage, while no pT3 or pT4 tumors were found in ucRCCs. Fuhrman grade and lymphatic metastasis were found to be significant prognostic factors for the overall survival of ucRCC. Unilocular cystic RCC has a lower Fuhrman grade and pathological stage and a better prognosis compared with solid RCC. Patients with ucRCC still probably have lymphatic metastasis at surgery and may have postoperative metastasis, which is different from MCRNLMP. We recommend that the diagnosis of ucRCC should be reflected in pathology report. Different subtype of cystic RCC should be taken into consideration in counseling and management.

Active surveillance versus initial surgery in the long-term management of Bosniak IIF-IV cystic renal masses

There may be surgical overtreatment of complex cystic renal masses (CRM). Growing evidence supports active surveillance (AS) for the management for Bosniak IIF-III CRMs. We aimed to evaluate and compare oncological and pathological outcomes of Bosniak IIF-IV CRMs treated by initial surgery (IS) or AS. We identified retrospectively 532 patients with CRM counseled during 2006-2017. IS and AS were delivered to, respectively, 1 and 286 patients in Bosniak IIF, to 54 and 85 patients in III and to 85 and 21 patients in Bosniak IV. Median follow-up was 66 months (IQR 50-96). Metastatic progression occurred for 1 (0.3%) AS patient in Bosniak IIF, 1 IS (1.8%) and 1 AS (1.2%) patient in Bosniak III and 5 IS (3.5%) patients in Bosniak IV, respectively. Overall 5-year metastasis-free survival was 98.9% and cancer-specific survival was 99.6% without statistically significant difference between IS and AS in Bosniak IIF-IV categories. AS did not increase the risk of metastatic spread or cancer-specific mortality in patients with Bosniak IIF-IV. Our data indicate AS in Bosniak IIF and III is safe. Surgery is the primary treatment for Bosniak IV due to its high malignancy rate.

HIGH RISK DISEASE AND POOR FOLLOWUP: THE IMPORTANCE OF RENAL MASS BIOPSY IN A COHORT OF VETERANS

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical utility of RMB in our multi-state system. Renal mass biopsy (RMB) is useful in the management of masses ≤ 4 cm (T1a), but evaluation of RMB in the uniquely vulnerable Veteran population is lacking.

METHODS

136 RMB in 130 patients performed between 06/2015 and 11/2020 were identified in this Quality Improvement analysis. Demographics, size, pathology, treatment, and biopsy complications were analyzed. Of 101 T1a masses, 89 were either diagnostic or not decompressed cysts and 77 met inclusion criteria for follow-up imaging compliance analysis.

RESULTS

The median age was 66 years. The diagnostic rate was 94.1% (128/136) for all masses and 94.1% (95/101) for T1a renal masses, with a complication rate of 2.2%. Among solid T1a masses, unexpectedly aggressive lesions (Fuhrman Grade 4, Type 2 papillary or sarcomatoid features) were identified in 8/89 (9.0%). 57 (64%) patients were treated with cryoablation or surgery and 32 (36%) patients elected active surveillance (AS). A neoplastic finding (oncocytoma or RCC) was present in 16 patients choosing AS (50%) compared to 52 patients choosing treatment (91%). Compliance with NCCN-recommended imaging was 50% and 47% for AS and treatment groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this VA cohort, we found a significant incidence of high-risk lesions and poor compliance with follow-up imaging. Aggressive biopsy protocols with high consideration of treatment may be appropriate to limit risk in those lost to follow-up. Given that 9% of our small renal masses were highly aggressive, biopsy may be critical in the selection of AS candidates.

A Renal Cyst Invaded by Infiltrating Renal Cell Carcinoma With Multiple Hypermetabolic Bone Metastases as the Initial Presentation

ABSTRACT

Cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) refers to an indolent version of RCC composed predominantly of cysts, and it is associated with good prognosis. We showed the FDG PET/CT findings in a patient with multiple hypermetabolic bone metastases presenting with pain in the left shoulder and upper abdomen, who was later found to have cystic RCC. FDG PET/CT demonstrated hypermetabolic bone lesions and slight thickening of the renal cyst wall with light metabolism. This report indicates the risk of misdiagnosing cystic RCC as a renalcyst.

Growth Kinetics and Progression Rate of Bosniak Classification, Version 2019 III and IV Cystic Renal Masses on Imaging Surveillance

Background: Active surveillance is increasingly used as first-line management for localized renal masses. Triggers for intervention primarily reflect growth kinetics, which are poorly investigated for cystic masses defined by Bosniak classification version 2019 (v2019). Objective: To determine growth kinetics and incidence rates of progression of class III and IV cystic renal masses, as defined by Bosniak classification v2019. Methods: This retrospective study included 105 patients (68 men, 37 women; median age, 67 years) with 112 Bosniak v2019 class III or IV cystic renal masses on baseline renal-mass protocol CT or MRI examinations from January 2005 to September 2021. Mass dimensions were measured. Progression was defined as any of: linear growth rate (LGR) ≥5 mm per year (representing clinical guideline threshold for intervention), volume doubling time <1 year, T category increase, or N1 or M1 disease. Class III and IV masses were compared. Time-to-progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Results: At baseline, 58 masses were class III and 54 were class IV. Median follow-up was 406 days. Median LGR was for class III masses 0.0 mm per year [interquartile range (IQR) -1.3 to 1.8] and for class IV masses 2.3 mm per year (IQR 0.0¬¬-5.7) (p<.001). LGR exceeded 5 mm per year in 4 (7%) class 3 masses and 15 (28%) class IV masses (p=.005). Two patients, both with class IV masses, developed distant metastases. Incidence rate of progression was for class III masses 11.0 (95% CI 4.5-22.8) and for class IV masses 73.6 (95% CI 47.8-108.7) per 100,000 person-days of follow-up. Median time-to-progression was undefined for class III mases given small number of progression events and 710 days for class IV masses. Hazard ratio of progression for class IV relative to class III masses was 5.1 (95% CI 2.5-10.8) (p<.001). Conclusion: During active surveillance of cystic masses evaluated using Bosniak classification v2019, class IV masses grew faster and were more likely to progress than class III masses. Clinical Impact: In comparison with current active surveillance guidelines that treat class III and IV masses similarly, future iterations may incorporate relatively more intensive surveillance for class IV masses.

Active Surveillance of Renal Masses: The Role of Radiology

Active surveillance of renal masses, which includes serial imaging with the possibility of delayed treatment, has emerged as a viable alternative to immediate therapeutic intervention in selected patients. Active surveillance is supported by evidence that many benign masses are resected unnecessarily, and treatment of small cancers has not substantially reduced cancer-specific mortality. These data are a call to radiologists to improve the diagnosis of benign renal masses and differentiate cancers that are biologically aggressive (prompting treatment) from those that are indolent (allowing treatment deferral). Current evidence suggests that active surveillance results in comparable cancer-specific survival with a low risk of developing metastasis. Radiology is central in this. Imaging is used at the outset to estimate the probability of malignancy and degree of aggressiveness in malignant masses and to follow up masses for growth and morphologic change. Percutaneous biopsy is used to provide a more definitive histologic diagnosis and to guide treatment decisions, including whether active surveillance is appropriate. Emerging applications that may improve imaging assessment of renal masses include standardized assessment of cystic and solid masses and radiomic analysis. This article reviews the current and future role of radiology in the care of patients with renal masses undergoing active surveillance.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Renal Cystic Mass

BACKGROUND

Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma (CRCC) is often challenging to differentiate from complex cysts with sonographic manifestations of renal carcinoma. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) is a new technology, and its clinical utility in the diagnosis of renal cystic mass has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the characteristics of CEUS of renal cystic masses and to explore the clinical significance and value of CEUS in the diagnosis of CRCC.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective study. A total of 32 cystic masses from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected. The images of conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS were confirmed via surgical pathology. The routine US was used to observe the location, shape, size, boundary, cyst wall, internal echo, and blood supply of each cystic mass. CEUS observed contrast enhancement of the cyst wall, cystic septa, and solid nodules of cystic masses.

RESULTS

There were 26 cases of CRCC, 5 cases of renal cysts, and 1 case of renal tuberculosis. The enhancement pattern, degree of enhancement, and pseudocapsular sign by CEUS in benign and malignant masses had statistically significant differences (P<.05). In the diagnosis of CRCC, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.3%, 83.3%, 90.6%, 96.0%, and 71.4% for CEUS; 57.6%, 66.7%, 59.3%, 88.2%, and 26.7% for conventional US, respectively. CEUS had a higher sensitivity and accuracy than the conventional US (P<.05). However, the diagnostic specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the two methods were not significantly different (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS is more accurate in the diagnosis of renal cystic masses, and it can be used as an effective imaging method.

Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses, Version 2019: A Pictorial Guide to Clinical Use

Cystic renal masses are commonly encountered in clinical practice. In 2019, the Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, originally developed for CT, underwent a major revision to incorporate MRI and is referred to as the Bosniak Classification, version 2019. The proposed changes attempt to (a) define renal masses (ie, cystic tumors with less than 25% enhancing tissue) to which the classification should be applied; (b) emphasize specificity for diagnosis of cystic renal cancers, thereby decreasing the number of benign and indolent cystic masses that are unnecessarily treated or imaged further; (c) improve interobserver agreement by defining imaging features, terms, and classes of cystic renal masses; (d) reduce variation in reported malignancy rates for each of the Bosniak classes; (e) incorporate MRI and to some extent US; and (f) be applicable to all cystic renal masses encountered in clinical practice, including those that had been considered indeterminate with the original classification. The authors instruct how, using CT, MRI, and to some extent US, the revised classification can be applied, with representative clinical examples and images. Practical tips, pitfalls to avoid, and decision tree rules are included to help radiologists and other physicians apply the Bosniak Classification, version 2019 and better manage cystic renal masses. An online resource and mobile application are also available for clinical assistance. An invited commentary by Siegel and Cohan is available online. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Imaging Characterization of Renal Masses

The detection of a renal mass is a relatively frequent occurrence in the daily practice of any Radiology Department. The diagnostic approaches depend on whether the lesion is cystic or solid. Cystic lesions can be managed using the Bosniak classification, while management of solid lesions depends on whether the lesion is well-defined or infiltrative. The approach to well-defined lesions focuses mainly on the differentiation between renal cancer and benign tumors such as angiomyolipoma (AML) and oncocytoma. Differential diagnosis of infiltrative lesions is wider, including primary and secondary malignancies and inflammatory disease, and knowledge of the patient history is essential. Radiologists may establish a possible differential diagnosis based on the imaging features of the renal masses and the clinical history. The aim of this review is to present the contribution of the different imaging techniques and image guided biopsies in the diagnostic management of cystic and solid renal lesions.

A rare case of a cystic renal mass with heterotopic ossification and a mini literature review

INTRODUCTION

It is a challenge to make accurate pre-surgical diagnosis for renal tumors. This study is to report the findings, management, and outcome of one rare case of ossification in a cystic renal mass. We present and discuss the pathological characteristics, radiologic features, and treatment alternatives of the patient.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 38 years old female patient had intermittent epigastric pain and microscopic hematuria for two months. Computerized tomography (CT) scan and Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) showed a mass with rough edge and dense calcification in the upper pole of the right kidney and normal left kidney. Pre-operative diagnosis is cystic nephroma or cystic renal mass (Bosniak III type, Bosniak renal cyst classification). GFR was within normal limits for age and no other significant laboratory aberrations were noted. Patient underwent a right retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (margin status was negative). A mini literature review was performed to highlight the principals of diagnosis and treatment of cystic renal mass with heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

The entire renal mass was successfully removed from upper pole of the right kidney by laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery. The size of renal mass is 38×35×30 mm3 with thick and hard capsular wall. The cystic cavity contains yellow lipid-like substances without stone. Histological examination revealed renal cyst in which the cyst wall reveals fibrosis and no obvious lining epithelium. The additional unique feature includes the presence of dense calcification and ossification in the renal mass. Localization tissue of yellow bone marrow was detected. No complications occurred in 9 months after surgery during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic renal mass with heterotopic ossification is a rare case of non-malignant renal tumor. Whether surgery is needed depends to whether patients have symptoms. For symptom renal tumors, laparoscopic nephron sparing surgical procedure is recommended. Furthermore, complete surgical resection of the lesion is needed when the mass is suspected to be malignant. An accurate histologic diagnosis is key in its diagnosis.

Predictive Value of Additional Clinical and Radiological Parameters for Discrimination of Malignancy in Bosniak 3 Cysts

INTRODUCTION

Almost half of the cystic renal lesions are still overdiagnosed and overtreated. New clinical and radiological parameters are needed to distinguish the malignant Bosniak 3 lesions from the benign ones. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological parameters that may be related to malignancy risk for Bosniak category 3 renal cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection of a histopathologically confirmed Bosniak 3 renal cyst between March 2007 and September 2019 were evaluated. Two experienced uro-radiologists have reevaluated the last preoperative computed tomography and/or MRI images of the patients and reclassified the lesions according to the Bosniak classification. They also reported cystic features such as nodularity, septation, focal thickening, enhancement, and calcification. Clinical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Then patients were divided into 2 groups as Group 1 (benign pathology) and Group 2 (malignant pathology) according to final histopathological report.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included in this study. Mean follow-up time was 47 ± 34 months. There were 30 patients in Group 1 and 49 patients in Group 2. Hypertension (p = 0.001) and smoking history (p = 0.008) were more common in malignant group. Among the radiological findings, lower tumor diameter (p = 0.024), presence of cyst wall enhancement (p = 0.025), presence of nodularity (p = 0.002), and presence of focal thickening (p = 0.031) were found to be statistically significant for malignancy. Most of the tumors were at pathological T1 stage and Fuhrmann Grade 1-2. Only nodularity was found to be independent predictive factor for malignancy in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Clinical factors including hypertension and smoking, radiological factors including lower lesion size, cyst wall enhancement, nodularity, and focal thickening were predictors for malignancy of Bosniak 3 cysts.

Update on MRI of Cystic Renal Masses Including Bosniak Version 2019

Incidental cystic renal masses are common, usually benign, and almost always indolent. Since 1986, the Bosniak classification has been used to express the risk of malignancy in a cystic renal mass detected at imaging. Historically, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not included in that classification. The proposed Bosniak v.2019 update has formally incorporated MRI, included definitions of imaging terms designed to improve interobserver agreement and specificity for malignancy, and incorporated a variety of masses that were incompletely defined or not included in the original classification. For example, at unenhanced MRI, homogeneous masses markedly hyperintense at T₂ -weighted imaging (similar to cerebrospinal fluid) and homogeneous masses markedly hyperintense at fat suppressed T₁ -weighted imaging (approximately ≥2.5 times more intense than adjacent renal parenchyma) are classified as Bosniak II and may be safely ignored, even when they have not been imaged with a complete renal mass MRI protocol. MRI has specific advantages and is recommended to evaluate masses that at computed tomography (CT) 1) have abundant thick or nodular calcifications; 2) are homogeneous, hyperattenuating, ≥3 cm, and nonenhancing; or 3) are heterogeneous and nonenhancing. Although MRI is generally excellent for characterizing cystic renal masses, there are unique weaknesses of MRI that bear consideration. These details and others related to MRI of cystic renal masses are described in this review, with an emphasis on Bosniak v.2019. A website (https://bosniak-calculator.herokuapp.com/) and mobile phone apps named "Bosniak Calculator" have been developed for ease of assignment of Bosniak classes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses, Version 2019: An Update Proposal and Needs Assessment

Cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is almost certainly overdiagnosed and overtreated. Efforts to diagnose and treat RCC at a curable stage result in many benign neoplasms and indolent cancers being resected without clear benefit. This is especially true for cystic masses, which compared with solid masses are more likely to be benign and, when malignant, less aggressive. For more than 30 years, the Bosniak classification has been used to stratify the risk of malignancy in cystic renal masses. Although it is widely used and still effective, the classification does not formally incorporate masses identified at MRI or US or masses that are incompletely characterized but are highly likely to be benign, and it is affected by interreader variability and variable reported malignancy rates. The Bosniak classification system cannot fully differentiate aggressive from indolent cancers and results in many benign masses being resected. This proposed update to the Bosniak classification addresses some of these shortcomings. The primary modifications incorporate MRI, establish definitions for previously vague imaging terms, and enable a greater proportion of masses to enter lower-risk classes. Although the update will require validation, it aims to expand the number of cystic masses to which the Bosniak classification can be applied while improving its precision and accuracy for the likelihood of cancer in each class.

The Complete Spectrum of Infiltrative Renal Masses: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Implications

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the full spectrum of patients presenting with radiologically-identified infiltrative renal masses (IRMs), including those managed surgically or otherwise, with focus on clinical presentation/prognosis.

METHODS

All 280 patients presenting with radiologically-identified renal mass with infiltrative features (2008-2017) were retrospectively reviewed. Poorly-defined interface between tumor and parenchyma and irregular shape (nonelliptical) in one or more distinct/unequivocal areas were required for classification as IRM. IRM was confirmed in 265 and clinical characteristics and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Median age/tumor size were 65-years/6.9 cm, respectively, and 225 patients (85%) were R.E.N.A.L. = 10-12. Overall, 181 patients (68%) presented symptomatically, locally-advanced cancer (cT3-T4) was observed in 176 (66%) and disseminated disease and/or lymphadenopathy (>2 cm) in 181(68%). Clinical/radiographic findings were suggestive of etiology and could direct evaluation, but were nonspecific for definitive diagnosis. Renal-mass biopsy was performed in 103 patients and diagnostic in 97 (94%). Renal surgery was only performed in 82 patients (31%) and partial nephrectomy in 3 (1.1%). Overall, 72 patients (27%) received systemic chemotherapy and 59 (22%) targeted therapy. Final-diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma in 94 patients (35%), including 49 with highly-aggressive histology (sarcomatoid/rhabdoid/collecting-duct/medullary/unclassified). High-grade urothelial-carcinoma was found in 70 (26%), and lymphoma/metastatic cancer in 26 (10%)/25 (9%), respectively. Overall, 153 patients (58%) died; 138 (52%) cancer-related at median of 5 months. The majority of patients with renal cell carcinoma, urothelial-carcinoma, and renal metastasis died, almost exclusively cancer-related, at medians of 8, 3, and 2 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our series includes the full spectrum of IRMs and confirms predominance of symptomatic, poorly-differentiated, highly-lethal malignancies. Our study highlights the overriding importance of identifying infiltrative features, a simple radiologic diagnosis, during assessment of renal masses.