A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics Prior to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in a Low Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium

High-Risk Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Have Fewer Infections with a Longer Course of Preoperative Antibiotics

Introduction: There are minimal data to guide antibiotic management of patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Specifically, management of high-risk patients who are catheter dependent or have positive preoperative urine cultures varies widely. We aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative antibiotic duration on infectious complications in high-risk patients undergoing HoLEP. Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients undergoing HoLEP between 2018 and 2023 at five institutions was performed. Patients were defined as high risk if they were catheter-dependent (indwelling urethral catheter, self-catheterization, or suprapubic tube) or had a positive preoperative urine culture. These patients were categorized into long course (>3 days) or short course (≤3 days) of preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome was 30-day infectious complications defined as a positive urine culture with symptoms. A t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify associations with infectious complications. Results: Our cohort included 407 patients, of which 146 (36%) and 261 (64%) were categorized as short course and long course of preoperative antibiotics, respectively. Median preoperative antibiotic duration was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR]: 0, 3 days) and 7 days (IQR: 5, 7 days) in the short and long cohorts, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative infectious complications occurred in 11 (7.6%) patients who received a short course of antibiotics and 5 (1.9%) patients who received a long course of antibiotics (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.67; p = 0.009). Variables such as age, positive urine culture, and postoperative antibiotic duration were not significantly associated with postoperative infection after propensity score weighting. Conclusion: In high-risk patients undergoing HoLEP, infectious complications were significantly lower with a long course vs short course of antibiotics. Further prospective trials are needed to identify optimal preoperative antibiotic regimens.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management

BACKGROUND

The stone burden based management strategy reported in the guidelines published by different associations is well known for a long time. Staghorn calculi, representing the largest burden and most complex stones, is one of the most challenging cases to practicing urologists in clinical practice. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) has released a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis.

PURPOSE

To develop a series of recommendations for the contemporary management management of staghorn calculi and to provide a clinical framework for urologists treating patients with these complex stones.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for articles published in English between 01/01/1976 and 31/12/2022 in the PubMed, OVID, Embase and Medline database is performed. A series of recommendations are developed and individually graded following the review of literature and panel discussion.

RESULTS

The definition, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative treatment strategies and procedural advice, early postoperative management, follow up and prevention of stone recurrence are summarized in the present document.

CONCLUSION

A series of recommendations regarding the management of staghorn calculi, along with related commentary and supporting documentation offered in the present guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the practicing urologists in the management of staghorn calculi.

Preoperative urine culture with contaminants is not associated with increased risk for urinary tract infection after ureteroscopic stone treatment

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess whether the presence of contaminants in the pre-operative urine culture (preop-UC) predicts postoperative urinary tract infection (postop-UTI) in patients undergoing elective ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed from 01/2019 to 12/2021 examining patients with unilateral stone burden ≤ 2 cm who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy and had a preop-UC within 3 months. Positive, negative, contaminated, and polymicrobial definitions for UCs were established in accordance with current guidelines. Patients with positive and polymicrobial cultures were excluded. Postop-UTI was defined as the presence of urinary symptoms and a positive UC within 30 days of the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate risk factors for contamination in the preop-UC and the risk of postop-UTI.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients met the inclusion-exclusion criteria. Preop-UC was negative in 153 patients and contaminated in 48 patients. Significant contaminant-related factors included female gender and increased BMI. Postop-UTI was diagnosed in 3.2% of patients with negative preop-UCs and 4.2% of patients with contaminants, with no difference between groups (p = 0.67). The regression model determined that the presence of contaminants in preop-UC failed to predict postop-UTI (OR 0.69, p = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

The presence of contaminants in preop-UCs is not associated with an increased risk of postop-UTIs after ureteroscopy. Our study supports that contaminants in the preop-UC can be interpreted as a negative UC in terms of postop-UTI risk stratification. Preoperative antibiotics should not be prescribed for patients undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone surgery in the setting of a contaminated preop-UC.

Advancements in Performance of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Ambulatory Surgery Centers: Outcomes and Lessons From 1250+ Cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of routine ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a freestanding ambulatory surgical center.

METHODS

Patients were treated between 2015 and 2022 by one of three experienced endourologists in Maryland. The surgery center is free-standing, with the nearest hospital approximately 10 minutes away. Patient characteristics and surgical datapoints, including need for transfer, were gathered prospectively at the time of surgery. Subset analyses were performed in patients with staghorn calculi or elevated body mass index, as they represent higher-risk populations.

RESULTS

A total of 1267 patients underwent ambulatory PCNL with a median stone diameter of 32 mm. The average recovery time was 87 minutes, with 1.7% of patients requiring transfer to the hospital, generally for postoperative hypotension or inadequate pain control. 166 patients with body mass index >40 were safely treated, with no significant difference in transfer rate (P = .5). 2.8% of patients had a complication, with the majority being Clavien-Dindo grade I or II. 88 patients with staghorn calculi were treated, with a 6% transfer rate. Staghorn calculi were the only factor found on multivariable analysis to be a significant predictor of transfer (OR 3.56 (1.17-10.82) P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory PCNL may safely be performed in a surgery center in most patients. These outcomes reflect the real-world experience of high-volume surgeons and demonstrate a multiyear paradigm shift in PCNL from an inpatient procedure to an outpatient procedure in a surgery center.

The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis

Aims

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines are a set of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating urolithiasis in the Saudi population. These guidelines are based on the latest evidence and expert consensus to improve patient outcomes and optimize care delivery. They cover the various aspects of urolithiasis, including risk factors, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatments, and prevention strategies. By following these guidelines, health-care professionals can improve care quality for individuals with urolithiasis in Saudi Arabia.

Panel

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel consists of urologists specialized in endourology with expertise in urolithiasis and consultation with a guideline methodologist. All panelists involved in this document have submitted statements disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.

Methods

The Saudi Guidelines on Urolithiasis were developed by relying primarily on established international guidelines to adopt or adapt the most appropriate guidance for the Saudi context. When necessary, the panel modified the phrasing of recommendations from different sources to ensure consistency within the document. To address areas less well covered in existing guidelines, the panel conducted a directed literature search for high quality evidence published in English, including meta analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective nonrandomized comparative studies. The panel also searched for locally relevant studies containing information unique to the Saudi Arabian population. The recommendations are formulated with a direction and strength of recommendation based on GRADE terminology and interpretation while relying on existing summaries of evidence from the existing guidelines.

Effect of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic use on postoperative infection after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with negative urine culture: a single-center randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of different preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) regimens on the incidence of sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with negative urine culture.

METHODS

A single-center, randomized controlled trial (June 2022-December 2023) included 120 patients with negative preoperative urine cultures for upper urinary tract stones who underwent PCNL (chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR2200059047). The experimental group and the control group were respectively given different levofloxacin-based preoperative ABP regimes, including 3 days before surgery and no ABP before surgery. Both groups were given a dose of antibiotics before the operation. The primary outcome was differences in the incidence of postoperative sepsis.

RESULTS

A total of 120 subjects were included, including 60 patients in the experimental group and 60 patients in the control group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable and intraoperative characteristics also did not differ. The sepsis rate was not statistically different between the experimental and control groups (13.3% vs.13.3%, P = 1.0). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1-1.6; P = 0.003) and operating time (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0-1.1; P = 0.012) were independent risk factors of sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that prophylactic antibiotic administration for 3 days before surgery did not reduce the incidence of postoperative sepsis in patients with negative urine cultures undergoing PCNL. For this subset of patients, we recommend that a single dose of antibiotics be given prior to the commencement of surgery seems adequate.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Contemporary Practice Patterns

Background: Updated in 2019, the American Urological Association's (AUA) Best Practice Statement on Urologic Procedures and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis outlines prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Recent studies have challenged these recommendations. We hypothesized that endourologists do not routinely follow the AUA's statement on antibiotic use during PCNL and assessed their prescribing patterns. Methods: A 24-question survey was distributed to members of the Endourological Society. The primary outcome was adherence to the AUA's recommendations. Two multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with demographics and antibiotic preference as predictors of following the AUA. Results: A total of 51.4% of endourologists follow the AUA Best Practice Statement for antimicrobial prophylaxis of uncomplicated PCNL. No demographic data were predictive of following the AUA. 90.9% and 83.6% reported they have "never" used the first-line recommendation options of metronidazole and aztreonam, respectively. Preferred antibiotics were cephalosporins (uncomplicated 60%, complicated 52.6%), fluoroquinolones (13.3%, 7.2%), aminoglycosides (12.7%, 17.8%), penicillins (7.9%, 11.2%), carbapenems (0.6%, 0.7%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2.4%, 5.9%), fosfomycin (0.6%, 0.7%), nitrofurantoin (2.4%, 2.6%), aztreonam (0%, 0.7%), and clindamycin (0%, 0.7%). For uncomplicated PCNL, 63.1% prescribe ≤24 hours of perioperative antibiotics. For complicated PCNL, 16.2% prescribe ≤24 hours of perioperative antibiotics, while 20.4% begin antibiotics 7 or more days prior. Conclusions: Nearly half of respondents do not follow the AUA's recommendations for antibiotic choice for PCNL. Few endourologists prescribe 7 days of preoperative antibiotics for complicated PCNL despite supporting data. Metronidazole and aztreonam are rarely used as a first-line antibiotic choice for PCNL and their roles needs to be further evaluated as first-line prophylaxis recommendations. Updates on antibiotic recommendations for PCNL are needed based on current literature, antimicrobial stewardship, and contemporary practice patterns.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Labate et al.) is the standard procedure for the treatment of large (≥2cm) kidney stones. The patient can be in prone or modified supine position. The puncture is performed under fluoroscopy and/or ultrasound guidance. The stone-free rate seems to be comparable between miniaturized and standard PCNL. Procedures performed with smaller diameter instruments tend to be associated with significant lower blood loss, but longer procedure times. The limitation of the number of percutaneous tracts results in better preservation of the kidney function and lowers the risk of complications. The use of tranexamic acid during PCNL may be interesting for reducing the bleeding risk, the transfusion rate, and possibly the intervention duration. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Duration for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Low-Risk Patients

Introduction and Objective: Postoperative infection and sepsis account for the most common complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), as high as 14% in low-risk patients. Although the American Urological Association (AUA) recommends perioperative antibiotics for 24 hours or less for PCNL, practice patterns vary regarding duration of antibiotic therapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of 24-hour antibiotic coverage vs short-course protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis for PCNL. Materials and Methods: Low-risk patients with a sterile preoperative urine culture undergoing PCNL were prospectively randomized to antibiotics for up to 24 hours after procedure (24Hr) or continued until external urinary catheters were removed (CR) study groups. Patients were given a first generation cephalosporin, or ciprofloxacin in patients with penicillin allergy. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, receiving antibiotics immediately before the procedure, history of urosepsis, presence of indwelling catheter >1 week, multistage procedure, immunosuppression, pregnancy, multiple antibiotic allergies, and patients who are breastfeeding. Results: Ninety-eight patients were randomized to either 24Hr (n = 49) or CR (n = 49). Mean duration of antibiotic administration was 20.6 and 34.0 hours in the 24Hr and CR groups (p = 0.04), respectively. Age, comorbidities, stone size, operative time, number of punctures, dilations, and proportion of "tubeless" procedures were similar between groups. There were no differences in febrile episodes, rates of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, bacteremia, or culture-proven postoperative urinary tract infection between the 24Hr and CR groups. Overall complication rates were similar between groups. In a subgroup analysis which excluded "tubeless" patients (24 and 29 patients in 24Hr and CR groups, respectively), no differences were seen in postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: In a randomized, prospective study, we found that a 24-hour protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis is not associated with increased risk of infection-related events compared to giving antibiotics until external catheters are removed in patients with low infectious risk undergoing PCNL. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02579161.

The Mayo adhesive probability score predicts postoperative fever and intraoperative hemorrhage in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

Contemporary predictive tools for miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) mainly focus on stone clearance but not perioperative complications, especially infection and hemorrhage. This study aimed to evaluate whether the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, an index of the perinephric fat characteristics, can predict postoperative fever and intraoperative hemorrhage in mPCNL.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study recruiting 159 mPCNL patients from July 2018 to January 2022. MAP scores were recorded using preoperative computed tomography. Postoperative complications included postoperative fever and intraoperative bleeding, defined as hemoglobin drop.

RESULTS

Over half patients had the MAP score ≧ 3. Men, elderly, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes were associated with a higher MAP score. The patients with a higher MAP score were more likely to have postoperative fever after mPCNL. On multivariate analysis, preoperative positive urine culture (OR 2.68) and a higher MAP score (OR 2.28) were both significantly associated with postoperative fever. ROC curves analysis of the combination of these two factors on predicting postoperative fever showed AUC values were 0.731 (0.652-0.810). Moreover, a higher MAP score (OR 2.30) and longer operative time (OR 2.16) were significantly associated with higher hemoglobin drop on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

A high MAP score was associated with postoperative fever and intraoperative hemorrhage in patients undergoing mPCNL. The MAP score can be a novel and easy predictive tool to help endourologists improve the awareness of mPCNL safety.

A randomised controlled trial comparing two protocols of preoperative antibiotics in patients with positive urine culture undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

AIM

To compare the outcomes of two different protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with positive urine culture undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were prospectively enrolled for the randomised study to either group A which included patients where an attempt to sterilise the urine was made with a 1 week course of sensitive antibiotics or group B that included patients who received a shorter duration of prophylaxis using sensitive antibiotics for 48 h prior to procedure which was continued for 48 h postoperatively. Enrolled patients had stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy and had a positive preoperative urine culture. Primary outcome was difference in sepsis rates between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients randomised into two groups of 40 each based on the antibiotic protocol used were analysed in the study. There was no difference in infectious complication rates between groups on univariate analysis. The rate of SIRS in Group A and Group B was found to be 20% (N = 8) and 22.5% (N = 9) respectively. The rate of septic shock in Group A and Group B was 7.5% and 5% respectively. On multivariate analysis, longer duration of antibiotics did not decrease the risk of sepsis compared to shorter antibiotic course (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

Attempts to sterilise urine before PCNL may not decrease the risk of sepsis in patients with positive urine culture undergoing PCNL and may only result in unnecessary prolonging of antibiotic usage thereby increasing the chances of antibiotic resistance.

Preoperative patient optimization for endourological procedures: the current best clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite technological advancements in endourological surgery, there is room for improvement in preoperative patient optimization strategies. This review updates recent best clinical practices that can be implemented for optimal surgical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Outcome and complication predictions using novel scoring systems and techniques have shown to assist clinical decision-making and patient counseling. Innovative preoperative simulation and localization methods for percutaneous nephrolithotomy have been evaluated to minimize puncture-associated adverse events. Novel antibiotic prophylaxis strategies and further recognition of risk factors that attribute to postoperative infections have shown the potential to minimize perioperative morbidity. Accumulating data on the roles of preoperative stenting and selective oral alpha-blockers adds evidence to the current paradigm of preventive measures for ureteral injury.

SUMMARY

Ample tools and technologies exist that can be utilized preoperatively to improve surgical outcomes. The combination of these innovations, along with validation in larger-scale studies, presents the cornerstone of future urolithiasis management.

Heterogeneity in stone culture protocols and endourologist practice patterns: a multi-institutional survey

Kidney stone cultures can be beneficial in identifying bacteria not detected in urine, yet how stone cultures are performed among endourologists, under what conditions, and by what laboratory methods remain largely unknown. Stone cultures are not addressed by current clinical guidelines. A comprehensive REDCap electronic survey sought responses from directed (n = 20) and listserv elicited (n = 108) endourologists specializing in kidney stone disease. Questions included which clinical scenarios prompt a stone culture order, how results influence post-operative antibiotics, and what microbiology lab protocols exist at each institution with respect to processing and resulting stone cultures. Logistic regression statistical analysis determined what factors were associated with performing stone cultures. Of 128 unique responses, 11% identified as female and the mean years of practicing was 16 (range 1-46). A specific 'stone culture' order was available to only 50% (64/128) of those surveyed, while 32% (41/128) reported culturing stone by placing a urine culture order. The duration of antibiotics given for a positive stone culture varied, with 4-7 days (46%) and 8-14 days (21%) the most reported. More years in practice was associated with fewer stone cultures ordered, while higher annual volume of percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with ordering more stone cultures (p < 0.01). Endourologists have differing practice patterns with respect to ordering stone cultures and utilizing the results to guide post-operative antibiotics. With inconsistent microbiology lab stone culture protocols across multiple institutions, more uniform processing is needed for future studies to assess the clinical benefit of stone cultures and direct future guidelines.

The antibiotic strategies during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in China revealed the gap between the reality and the urological guidelines

Background

Correct perioperative antibiotic strategies are crucial to prevent postoperative infections during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We aimed to compare the realistic antibiotic strategies applied in China with current urological guidelines.

Methods

Between April and May 2020, urologists from China were invited to finish an online cross-sectional survey. The questionnaire was designed according to the current urological guidelines and literatures.

Results

3393 completed responses were received. 61.1% (2073/3393) respondents had urological experience of more than 10 years. 72.4% urologists chose multiple-dose antibiotics for patients with both negative urine culture (UC-) and negative urine microscopy (UM-) preoperatively. Respondents in central China (OR = 1.518; 95% CI 1.102–2.092; P = 0.011), east China (OR = 1.528; 95% CI 1.179–1.979; P = 0.001) and northeast China (OR = 1.904; 95% CI 1.298–2.792; P = 0.001) were more likely to prescribe multiple-dose antibiotic for UC-UM- patients. Notably, the respondents who finished PCNL exceeded 100 cases per year were in favor of single-dose administration (OR = 0.674; 95% CI 0.519–0.875; P = 0.003). There are only 8.3% urologists chose single-dose antibiotic for UC-UM+ patients, whereas 65.5% administered antibiotics for 1–3 days. Meanwhile, for UC+ patients, 59.0% of the urologists applied antibiotics shorter than 1 week, and only 26.3% of the urologists carried out routine re-examination of UC. Moreover, postoperative antibiotics were frequently prescribed for 3–6 days (1815; 53.5%). Finally, although 88.2% urologists considered stone culture important for management of postoperative antibiotics as the guideline recommended, only 18.5% performed it routinely.

Conclusions

The antibiotic strategies are different between current practice in China and the urological guidelines. The dissimilarities suggested that further studies should be conducted to investigate the reasons of the differences and standardize the application of antibiotics.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

A single dose of preventive antibiotics is known to be sufficient to reduce the rate of infection-related complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, some studies reported that the extended dose showed lower complications for high-risk groups. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing single- and extended-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for PCNL.

Materials and methods

Relevant studies that compared single- and extended-dose antibiotic prophylactic therapies were identified. Articles were selected from PubMed, EMBASE, KoreaMed, and Google Scholar up to September 2021. Fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were compared by meta-analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the degree of risk to the patient.

Results

A total of 10 articles were included in this study. There were no significant differences between single dose and extended dose in the rate of fever [p = 0.93, OR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–2.13, I² = 64%]. Extended dose showed lower rate of SIRS compared to single dose (p = 0.0005, OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.30–2.53, I² = 53%); in the subgroup analysis, extended dose also showed lower rates of SIRS compared to single dose in high-risk patients (p <0.0001, OR = 3.53, 95% CI 1.91–6.54, I² = 36%).

Conclusions

The results of our meta-analysis showed that single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis can be effective for PCNL, but extended-dose antibiotics can be required in high-risk patients to reduce post-PCNL infection-related complications.

Infectious complications of endourological treatment of kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Endourological treatment is associated with a risk of postoperative febrile urinary tract infections and sepsis. The aim of this study was to review the reported rate of infectious complications in relation to the type and modality of the endourologic procedure.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Two electronic databases (PubMed and EMBASE) were searched. Out of 243 articles retrieved we included 49 studies after full-text evaluation.

RESULTS

Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated that retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were associated with not significantly different odds of getting fever (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.99 to 2.39; p = 0.06) or sepsis (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.37 to 6.20, p = 0.56). The odds of getting fever were not significantly different for mini PCNL compared to standard PCNL (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.44; p = 0.45) and for tubeless PCNL compared to standard PCNL (OR = 1.34 95% CI: 0.61 to 2.91, p = 0.47). However, the odds for fever after PCNL with suctioning sheath were lower than the corresponding odds for standard PCNL (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.70, p = 0.002). The odds of getting fever after PCNL with perioperative prophylaxis were not different from the corresponding odds after PCNL with perioperative prophylaxis plus a short oral antibiotic course (before or after the procedure) (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.39, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of endourological procedure does not appear to be decisive in the onset of infectious complications, although the prevention of high intrarenal pressure during the procedure could be crucial in defining the risk of infectious complications.   on behalf of U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai.

Preoperative antibiotic therapy exceeding 7 days can minimize infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with positive urine culture

PURPOSE

To explore an appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with positive urine culture.

METHODS

From March 2016 to May 2018, consecutive patients with positive urine culture undergoing PCNL were prospectively registered. Initial preoperative antibiotics were given empirically. If needed, antibiotics were upgraded or adjusted to susceptible antibiotic after obtaining antibiotic-sensitivity test. Postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 220 participants, the incidence of positive stone culture and SIRS were 85.5% and 36.8%. Escherichia coli (53.6%, 44.5%) and Proteus mirabilis (8.2%, 10.0%) were the top two bacteria in urine and stones. In univariable analysis, patients with postoperative SIRS had a higher rate of stone culture positivity (97.5% VS 78.4%, P < 0.001) and a shorter duration of preoperative antibiotics therapy (3.4 ± 2.7 days versus 4.2 ± 2.8 days, P = 0.037). The landscape of SIRS showed a declining trend as the elongation of preoperative antibiotics (P = 0.039). In a day-by-day comparison, SIRS was less prevalent in patients treated by pre-PCNL antibiotics ≥ 7 days than in those with antibiotics ≤ 6 days (21.7% VS 40.8%, P = 0.017). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed positive stone culture (P = 0.001, OR 11.115) as an independent risk factor and pre-PCNL antibiotics ≥ 7 days (P = 0.048, OR 0.449) as an independent protective factor for SIRS. Preoperative antibiotic ≥ 7 days decreased SIRS from 45.4 to 27.8% and from 9.1 to 0% in patients with a positive and negative stone culture, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Exceeding seven days should be appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy before PCNL in patients with positive urine cultures.

The Surgical Technique of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

The mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) has become a versatile tool to remove kidney stones >2 cm, lower pole stones >1 cm, renal stones previously unresponsive to shockwave therapy or inaccessible by ureteroscopy (within a caliceal diverticulum), stones within complex urinary tracts (urinary diversions, transplanted kidney, and horseshoe kidneys), and large impacted proximal ureteral stones. After positioning in either the supine or prone position, a cystoscopy is performed to place an open-ended catheter, occlusion balloon, or Accordian device into the collecting system. A foley catheter is placed in the bladder. An ultrasound with a curvilinear probe is used to survey the kidney and guide access into the collecting system with an 18 g percutaneous needle. Once access is obtained, a small 0.5 cm skin incision is made and the percutaneous tract is dilated over a wire. A 16.5F metallic or self-dilating suctioning access sheath is positioned with fluoroscopic guidance. A 12F rigid mini-PCNL nephroscope is used to evaluate the collecting system. Once a calculus is observed, options for stone fragmentation include a lithotripter with ultrasonic and ballistic energy, or laser lithotripsy using holmium or thulium laser fibers. Flexible ureteroscopy can be considered to ensure clearance of the collecting system. A 6F ureteral stent can be placed in either a retrograde or antegrade approach for drainage. The tract is sealed using Surgiflo hemostatic matrix with thrombin. Guidelines for postoperative care and troubleshooting techniques for mini-PCNL are reviewed along with the surgical steps in the accompanying video (Supplementary Video S1). There are few randomized trials comparing mini-PCNL with standard PCNL and ureteroscopy. There is some evidence to suggest a difference in transfusion rates comparing mini- and standard PCNL, as well as differences in stone-free rates when comparing mini-PCNL with ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole stones.

Enhanced antibiotic treatment based on positive urine dipstick infection test before percutaneous nephrolithotomy did not prevent postoperative infection in patients with negative urine culture

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infection (UTI) should be treated before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, the most appropriate treatment strategy in patients with negative urine culture but positive urine dipstick infection test (positive urinary leukocyte or nitrite reaction) remains unclear.

METHODS

From August 2016 to February 2018, 806 consecutive patients who had undergone the first-stage PCNL with negative urine culture were included. Preoperative urinalysis, antibiotic treatment, intraoperative stone culture, and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were prospectively recorded. The primary outcome was SIRS. The impact of preoperative antibiotics on preoperative urinary tract infection, stone culture, and postoperative SIRS was studied.

RESULTS

Among the 806 participants, the rate of positive urine dipstick infection test and SIRS were 26.8% and 7.2%, respectively. In univariable analysis, positive urinary nitrite (p<0.001), positive urinary leukocytes (p<0.001), positive urine dipstick infection test (p<0.001), longer duration of pre-PCNL antibiotics (p=0.001), higher level of pre-PCNL antibiotics (p=0.010), infection stones (p=0.001), and positive stone culture (p<0. 001) were risk factors for SIRS. However, multivariable analysis showed that positive stone culture (p=0.004) and prolonged preoperative treatment with antibiotics (p=0.021) were independent risk factors for SIRS. Although preoperative antibiotics reduced the incidence of positive urine leukocyte (p<0.001) or nitrite reactions (p<0.001), prolonged or upgraded preoperative antibiotics did not affect the incidence of positive stone culture. Whether stone culture was positive (p=0.023) or negative (p=0.025), prolonged preoperative treatment with antibiotics was associated with a higher incidence of SIRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced preoperative antibiotic treatment based on positive urine dipstick infection tests was insufficient to reduce the incidence of positive stone culture but increased the risk of SIRS after PCNL in patients with negative urine cultures.

Miniaturized percutaneous Nephrolithotomy without antibiotic prophylaxis: a single institution experience

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients without preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) undergoing a miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of a modified perioperative antibiotic management strategy according to the principles of antibiotic stewardship (ABS). From December 2015 patients undergoing mPCNL for kidney stone with preoperative unremarkable urine culture no longer received an antibiotic prophylaxis (NoPAP). The NoPAP group was compared to mPCNL patients who received standard antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in the two years before. Analysis focused on postoperative complications. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Postoperative fever occurred in 8% of the NoPAP and 9% of the PAP patients (p = 0.764). Clavien 1-3 complications did not differ between groups with 33% in the NoPAP and 41% in the PAP (p = 0.511). No Clavien 4-5 complications were seen. A (partial) staghorn stone (HR 5.587; p = 0.019) and an infectious stone component (HR 6.313; p = 0.003) were identified as significant risk factors for postoperative fever. By sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis the overall antibiotic usage was reduced from 100% (PAP) to 9% (NoPAP).

CONCLUSION

Patients with negative preoperative UC, a none-staghorn stone and no history of recurrent UTI or infectious stones may not need routine antibiotic prophylaxis prior to mPCNL. A prospective validation is warranted.

European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

CONTEXT

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist's experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.

Antibiotic administration for negative midstream urine culture patients before percutaneous nephrolithotomy

To investigate how to administrate antibiotics for negative midstream urine culture (UC-) patients prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), we retrospectively analyzed UC-patients receiving 0 or 3 days of cefuroxime prior to PCNL between July 2017 and May 2020. Patients were further divided into four groups (Group1A = urine with positive both nitrite and white blood cell (N + WBC +) and 0-day pre-operative cefuroxime; Group1B = N + WBC + and 3-day cefuroxime; Group2A = N - WBC + and 0-day cefuroxime; Group2B = N - WBC + and 3-day cefuroxime). All patients routinely received a dose of cefuroxime 30 min prior to the surgery. In addition, Group1B were matched to the Group1A; Group2B were matched to the Group2A at a 1:1 ratio regarding stone burden, the degree of hydronephrosis, stone hardness, age and sex in a sequential order. A total of 560 patients were included (Group1A = 72; Group1B = 72; Group2A = 208; Group2B = 208). The baseline characteristics were equally distributed between the matched-pair groups. Compared to Group1B, Group1A had a significantly higher incidence of SIRS, fever, urosepsis requiring only additional antibiotics, and an increased postoperative hospitalization stay. Compared to Group2B, Group2A had similar rate of infectious complications. In addition, Group1B was associated with a significantly lower rate of positive pelvic urine culture (PUC +) than that of Group1A; whereas, there was similar rate of PUC + between Group2A and Group2B. UC-patients with N + WBC + should be treated with extended period of antibiotic administration, and a single dose of prophylactic antibiotic was sufficient for UC-patients with N - WBC + prior to PCNL. Despite UC, it is suggested to stratify pre-operative antibiotics tailored to individual patients to optimize its application.

Predictors of urosepsis in struvite stone patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Purpose

This study aims to identify clinical factors that may predispose struvite stone patients to urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who received PCNL for struvite stones. The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria and quick-Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (q-SOFA) criteria were used to identify patients who were at an increased risk for urosepsis. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exactness test, Wilcoxon rank test, and logistic regression.

Results

Chart review identified 99 struvite stone patients treated with PCNL. Post-operatively, 40 patients were SIRS positive (≥2 criteria) and/or q-SOFA positive (score ≥2). Using SIRS as an approximation for urosepsis, longer operative times (p<0.001), higher pre-operative white blood cell counts (p=0.01), greater total stone surface area (p<0.0001), and pre-operative stenting (OR, 5.75; p=0.01) were identified as independent risk factors for urosepsis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated pre-operative stenting (OR, 1.46; p=0.01) to be a risk factor. With q-SOFA, univariable analysis found that antibiotic use within 3 months prior to a PCNL (OR, 4.44; p=0.04), medical comorbidities (OR, 4.80; p=0.02), longer operative times (p<0.001), lengthier post-operative hospitalization (p<0.01), and greater total stone surface area (p<0.0001) were risk factors for urosepsis. Multivariate analysis revealed that bladder outlet obstruction (OR, 2.74; p<0.003) and pre-operative stenting (OR, 1.27; p=0.01) significantly increased odds of being q-SOFA positive.

Conclusions

Several risk factors for urosepsis following PCNL for struvite stones have been identified. These risk factors should be taken into consideration in peri-operative care to mitigate the risks of urosepsis.

Risk factors for the fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective analysis

Background

It’s very common to see the onset of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), it’s necessary to analyze the risk factors for the fever following PCNL, and to provide evidence for infection prevention after PCNL.

Methods

A total of 546 adult PCNL patients were included as study subjects and retrospective studies were performed. We collected clinical data of patients using a prospectively designed database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the potential risk factors for the fever after PCNL.

Results

Of the included 546 PCNL patients, there were 82 fever patients and 464 no-fever patients following PCNL. Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis are the two most common infectious bacteria. Preoperative urinary tract infection (OR =4.38, 95% CI: 1.15–9.53), multiple access (OR =5.31, 95% CI: 1.23–10.75), diabetes (OR =4.97, 95% CI: 1.37–9.86), length of operation ≥60 min (OR =5.67, 95% CI: 2.24–13.42), estimated blood loss in PCNL ≥500 mL (OR=2.78, 95% CI: 2.32–3.61) were the independent risk factors associated with postoperative infection.

Conclusions

Effective control of urinary tract infection, reduction of access number, strict control of blood glucose, length of operation control, reduction of intraoperative bleeding should be considered as measures to prevent postoperative fever for patients with PCNL.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: Troubleshooting and managing complications

Staghorn calculi comprise a unique subset of complex kidney stone disease. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard treatment for staghorn stones. Despite continuous refinements to the technique and instrumentation of PCNL, these stones remain a troublesome challenge for endourologists and are associated with a higher rate of perioperative complications than that for non-staghorn stones. Common and notable intraoperative complications include bleeding, renal collecting system injury, injury of visceral organs, pulmonary complications, thromboembolic complications, extrarenal stone migration, and misplacement of the nephrostomy tube. Postoperative complications include infection and urosepsis, bleeding, persistent nephrocutaneous urine leakage, infundibular stenosis, and death. In this review, we report recommendations regarding troubleshooting measures that can be used to identify and characterize these complications. Additionally, we include information regarding management strategies for complications associated with PCNL for staghorn calculi.

The evaluation of early predictive factors for urosepsis in patients with negative preoperative urine culture following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

To identify early predictive factors for urosepsis secondary to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in patients with negative preoperative urine culture (UC).

METHODS

A total of 786 patients with baseline negative UC who underwent MPCNL between January 2017 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Urosepsis was defined according to the Sepsis-3 definition. Subsequently, perioperative potential risk factors were compared between non-urosepsis and urosepsis groups.

RESULTS

Despite negative UC in all patients, the rate of positive stone culture (SC) was 16.0%; the rate of pelvic urine culture (PUC) was 7.5%; 23 cases (2.9%) developed urosepsis after MPCNL. Univariate analysis showed that urosepsis was associated with the female gender, BMI, stone burden, diabetes mellitus and preoperative urine test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that urine test with positive nitrite and white blood cells and leukocyte esterase (N+WBC+LE+) (OR 17.51, 95% CI 6.75-45.38, P < 0.001) and operative time > 120 min (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.41-8.85, P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for urosepsis. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of N+WBC+LE+ showed that the area under the curve was 0.785 for predicting the occurrence of urosepsis. Further analysis showed that N+WBC+LE+ provided an efficient prediction of SC+/PUC+ (SC+ or PUC+) with 61.7% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the baseline negative preoperative UC, 2.9% of patients developed urosepsis after MPCNL. N+WBC+LE + was determined to be an early and efficient prediction of intraoperative bacterial status and urosepsis following MPCNL. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm the results.

Recommended antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in retrograde intrarenal surgery: evidence from a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To study the incidence of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following different antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) regimens in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-centre, randomised, controlled trial (August 2014-September 2017) including 426 patients with renal stones with preoperative sterile urine managed by RIRS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02304822). Different ciprofloxacin-based ABP regimens were used and included a zero dose, single dose (30 min before surgery) or two doses (first dose at 30 min before RIRS and additional dose within 6 h after RIRS). The incidence of SIRS was compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

RESULTS

Each group enrolled 142 patients. In the ITT analysis, a zero dose of ABP was statistically similar to the two ABP regimes for the incidence of SIRS (9.9% vs single dose 4.9%, P = 0.112; vs two doses 4.2%, P = 0.062). There were also no relevant differences across groups in the PP analysis; no urosepsis was recorded. In subgroup analysis with stratification by stone area, the three regimens all had a low and similar incidence of SIRS for stones of ≤200 mm² in the ITT analysis with a sufficient power value (5.4% vs 6.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.945 vs single dose and P = 0.553 vs two doses). However, there was a greater chance of SIRS in patients who received no ABP with stones of >200 mm² (18% vs single dose 4.3%, P = 0.036; vs two doses 5.5%, P = 0.044). Similar trends were seen in the PP analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with preoperative sterile urine, ABP is not strongly recommended in patients with stones of ≤200 mm² , but for stones >200 mm² single-dose ABP is still required.

Contemporary best practice in the management of staghorn calculi

Staghorn calculi are complex renal stones that occupy the majority of the renal collecting system. These stones are associated with high morbidity and can lead to recurrent urinary tract infections, urosepsis, renal deterioration, and death if left untreated. Managing patients with staghorn calculi can be challenging. Fortunately, advances in technology and endourology techniques have enabled urologists to effectively treat these stones with minimal morbidity to the patient. This article describes the contemporary best practices in the initial evaluation, management, and follow up of patients with staghorn calculi to help the practicing urologist navigate this complex condition.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Renal Stone Culture in Predicting Postpercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Urosepsis/Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: A Prospective Analytical Study with Review of Literature

AIM

To evaluate and study the efficacy of intraoperative renal stone culture (IOSC) in predicting postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) urosepsis (PPS) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). PPS is known to occur in patients despite negative preoperative midstream urine culture (MSUC).

METHODS

After obtaining institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent, 78 selected patients undergoing PCNL were evaluated as per protocol for risk factors for SIRS criteria with MSUC, intraoperative renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC), and IOSC.

RESULTS

MSUC was positive in six (7.7%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV) and respiratory rate of MSUC for detecting SIRS were 20%, 93.15, 16.67%, 94.44%, and threefold, respectively. RPUC was positive in five (6.9%) patients with a specificity and NPV of 92.64% and 94.02%, respectively. IOSC positivity was seen in four (5.1%) patients with specificity and NPV of 94.5% and 3.2%, respectively. SIRS developed in five (6.4%) patients. MSUC, RPUC, and IOSC could not demonstrate any significant association with the occurrence of SIRS. Postoperative urine culture (POUC) was positive in 1/5 SIRS patients and no significant association (p < 0.182) could be demonstrated between the risk factors and PPS. Most complications were minor, while the mean hospital stay was significantly higher in SIRS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While MSUC, RPUC, and IOSC were less sensitive in predicting the occurrence of SIRS/urosepsis in patients undergoing PCNL, nevertheless, we recommend routine IOSC for stone colonizing bacteria in at-risk select patients to predict potential PPS/SIRS. POUCs could be used in symptomatic SIRS to guide antimicrobial therapy in post-PCNL patients. Positive peri/intraoperative urine cultures may assist the urologist in directing appropriate antibiotics to prevent potential urosepsis in post-PCNL patients. Those with a higher blood transfusion rate and Clavien complications were at increased risk of PPS/SIRS. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated microbe followed by Klebsiella and Proteus, which were mostly sensitive to nitrofurantoin.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stone therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview about state-of-the-art antibiotic prophylaxis in urolithasis therapy and focus on recent publications in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of high-quality publications within the recent time is limited. Preoperative inflammatory blood parameters like C-reactive protein and erythrocyte-sedimentation rate might help in prediction of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). White blood cell count is nonpredictive for urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients with acute renal colic. In patients with low risk for infectious complications, antibiotic prophylaxis during shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) is unnecessary and single-dose antibiotics are comparably effective as prolonged antibiotic usage during PCNL and ureterorenoscopy (URS).

SUMMARY

Current findings support the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline recommendations for a risk-adapted minimal antibiotic usage. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is sufficient for low-risk PCNL and URS. For SWL no antibiotic prophylaxis is needed.