1
|
Ben-Aharon O, Sergienko R, Iskrov G, Greenberg D. Willingness to pay for an mRNA-based anti-cancer treatment: results from a contingent valuation study in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res 2024; 13:9. [PMID: 38374060 PMCID: PMC10875764 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-024-00594-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND mRNA technology is currently being investigated for a range of oncology indications. We assessed the willingness to pay (WTP) of the general population in Israel for a hypothetical novel mRNA-based treatment for oncology indications. METHODS We used a contingent valuation methodology to elicit WTP using a web-based questionnaire. A sample of adult participants were presented with a hypothetical scenario in which an mRNA-based intervention increased the likelihood of a cure for various cancer types from 20% to 40% (half of the sample), or 60% (the other half of the sample). RESULTS 531 respondents completed the questionnaire. The mean, median and mode WTP for the proposed hypothetical treatment in both scenarios were ILS65,000 (± ILS114,000), ILS20,000 and ILS50,000, respectively (1USD = 3.4ILS). The WTP was skewed towards zero, and 9.6% of the respondents were not willing to pay any amount. WTP higher amounts was significantly associated with higher income (p < 0.01), self-reported good health (p < 0.05), supplementary health insurance (p < 0.05), Jews compared to other populations (p < 0.01), interest in technology (p < 0.001) and a tendency to adopt medical innovations (p < 0.001). No statistical difference between the 40% vs. the 60% potential cure scenarios was found. Logistic and OLS regressions indicated that age, religion, income, and interest in adopting medical innovations were the best predictors of respondents' WTP. CONCLUSION Despite the scientific breakthroughs in oncology treatment over the last few decades, many types of cancer are still incurable. Given the expected development of innovative mRNA-based treatments for cancer, these results should inform policymakers, the pharmaceutical industry and other stakeholders on the future coverage and reimbursement of these technologies incorporating patients' and societal views. To date, WTP considerations have not been given much weight in prioritization of drug reimbursement processes, neither in Israel nor in other countries. As a pioneer in adoption of the mRNA technology, Israel can also lead the incorporation of WTP considerations in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Ben-Aharon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
| | - Ruslan Sergienko
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Georgi Iskrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Dan Greenberg
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ben-Aharon O, Iskrov G, Sagy I, Greenberg D. Willingness to pay for cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:281-295. [PMID: 36635646 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2167713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Willingness to pay (WTP) studies examine the maximum amount of money an individual is willing to pay for a specified health intervention, and can be used to inform coverage and reimbursement decisions. Our objectives were to assess how people value cancer-related interventions, identify differences in the methodologies used, and review the trends in studies' publication. AREAS COVERED We extracted PubMed and EconLit articles published in 1997-2020 that reported WTP for cancer-related interventions, characterized the methodological differences and summarized each intervention's mean and median WTP values. We reviewed 1,331 abstracts and identified 103 relevant WTP studies, of which 37 (36%) focused on treatment followed by screening (26), prevention (21), diagnosis (7) and other interventions (12). The methods used to determine WTP values were primarily discrete-choice questions (n = 54, 52%), bidding games (15), payment cards (12) and open-ended questions (12). We found a wide variation in WTP reported values ranged from below $100 to over $20,000. EXPERT OPINION The WTP literature on oncology interventions has grown rapidly. There is considerable heterogeneity with respect to the type of interventions and diseases assessed, the respondents' characteristics, and the study methodologies. This points to the need to establish international guidelines for best practices in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Ben-Aharon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Georgi Iskrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Iftach Sagy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.,Soroka Medical Center, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| | - Dan Greenberg
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yong ASJ, Lim YH, Cheong MWL, Hamzah E, Teoh SL. Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:1037-1057. [PMID: 34853930 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01407-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding patient preferences in cancer management is essential for shared decision-making. Patient or societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) for desired outcomes in cancer management represents their preferences and values of these outcomes. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review is to critically evaluate how current literature has addressed WTP in relation to cancer treatment and achievement of outcomes. METHODS Seven databases were searched from inception until 2 March 2021 to include studies with primary data of WTP values for cancer treatments or achievement of outcomes that were elicited using stated preference methods. RESULTS Fifty-four studies were included in this review. All studies were published after year 2000 and more than 90% of the studies were conducted in high-income countries. Sample size of the studies ranged from 35 to 2040, with patient being the most studied population. There was a near even distribution between studies using contingent valuation and discrete choice experiment. Based on the included studies, the highest WTP values were for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) ($11,498-$589,822), followed by 1-year survival ($3-$198,576), quality of life (QoL) improvement ($5531-$139,499), and pain reduction ($79-$94,662). Current empirical evidence suggested that improvement in QoL and pain reduction had comparable weights to survival in cancer management. CONCLUSION This systematic review provides a summary on stated preference studies that elicited patient preferences via WTP and summarised their respective values. Respondents in this review had comparable WTP for 1-year survival and QoL, suggesting that improvement in QoL should be emphasised together with survival in cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alene Sze Jing Yong
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Yi Heng Lim
- School of Biosciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mark Wing Loong Cheong
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Siew Li Teoh
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soler L, Borzykowski N. The costs of celiac disease: a contingent valuation in Switzerland. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2021; 22:1487-1505. [PMID: 34618236 PMCID: PMC8558187 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01376-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This paper proposes a first monetary measure of the private costs of celiac disease, including intangible costs (physical symptoms, logistical constraints, etc.) in Switzerland. This auto-immune disease damages the intestine when patients ingest gluten. The only treatment currently available is a gluten-free diet, which implies great nutritional constraints. To get a monetary equivalent of the costs borne by celiac patients, we used a contingent valuation. The scenario suggested to celiac patients a treatment in form of a daily pill, which would allow them to eat normally and avoid any physical pain from celiac disease. Mean Willingness To Pay (WTP) for the treatment is found to be around CHF 87 (approx. USD 87) per month. WTP is positively influenced by direct and indirect costs of the disease. Oppositely, individuals, who find the gluten-free diet healthier are willing to pay less. Finally, unlike symptoms before diagnostic, the current presence or intensity of physical symptoms are found to be insignificant. The latter result can be explained by the fact that, individuals facing stronger symptoms are more likely to adhere strictly to the GFD and hence to reduce their frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laia Soler
- University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Borzykowski
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland in Business Administration (HEG-Genève), Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kavosi Z, Jafari A, Keshtkaran V, Pourahmadi E. Estimating Willingness to Pay for an Improved Service Delivery to Patients Referring Namazi Hospital Chemical
Therapy Ward in Iran Using Contingent Valuation. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19:1817-1823. [PMID: 30049193 PMCID: PMC6165632 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.7.1817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to estimate patients’ willingness to pay (WTP) for improving the quality of non-medical aspect in Namazi hospital patients chemotherapy an assessment using the contingent valuation method (CVM). Patients and Methods This was an applied, cross-sectional and analytical-descriptive study carried out in Iran, Shiraz in 2013. A sample of 185 patients was determined using random sampling. Multiple choice questions and follow-up open-ended questions were employed to elicit patients’ WTP. The question asked patients would have to pay for this improving their own pocket. linear regression were used to Econometrically estimate the maximum WTP using STATA 11 software. Results The results of this study indicated that 31% were male and 69% were female and the adjusted mean WTP was PPPUS$15 for pat maximum amount of willing to pay was for to get the same quality service in own city respondents (PPPUS$16) and minimum amount of willing to pay was to get advice of experienced nurse(PPPUS$10) Patients were willing to pay more if their satisfaction with two attributes of care were increased. The cancer type and income taking care of you are significant factors influencing a patient’s WTP. Conclusions In the worst socio-economic conditions of the people were willing to pay to improve the reducing wait times in receiving a drug and get the same quality service in own city respondents. In Future efforts Health policymakers should consider the ability to pay when making their decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Kavosi
- Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Understanding how prostate cancer patients value the current treatment options for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:240.e13-240.e20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
7
|
Hall IJ, Lee Smith J. Evolution of a CDC Public Health Research Agenda for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49:S483-8. [PMID: 26590643 PMCID: PMC4733621 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Revised: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Men with prostate cancer face difficult choices when selecting a therapy for localized prostate cancer. Comparative data from controlled studies are lacking and clinical opinions diverge about the benefits and harms of treatment options. Consequently, there is limited guidance for patients regarding the impact of treatment decisions on quality of life. There are opportunities for public health to intervene at several decision-making points. Information on typical quality of life outcomes associated with specific prostate cancer treatments could help patients select treatment options. From 2003 to present, the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control at CDC has supported projects to explore patient information-seeking behavior post-diagnosis, caregiver and provider involvement in treatment decision making, and patient quality of life following prostate cancer treatment. CDC's work also includes research that explores barriers and facilitators to the presentation of active surveillance as a viable treatment option and promotes equal access to information for men and their caregivers. This article provides an overview of the literature and considerations that initiated establishing a prospective public health research agenda around treatment decision making. Insights gathered from CDC-supported studies are poised to enhance understanding of the process of shared decision making and the influence of patient, caregiver, and provider preferences on the selection of treatment choices. These findings provide guidance about attributes that maximize patient experiences in survivorship, including optimal quality of life and patient and caregiver satisfaction with information, treatment decisions, and subsequent care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid J Hall
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Judith Lee Smith
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gao L, Xia L, Pan SQ, Xiong T, Li SC. Burden of epilepsy: A prevalence-based cost of illness study of direct, indirect and intangible costs for epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2015; 110:146-56. [PMID: 25616467 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2014] [Revised: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 12/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Gao
- School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, MS 128, Medical Sciences Building,Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
| | - Li Xia
- Neurology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 238 Jiefang Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China.
| | - Song-Qing Pan
- Neurology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 238 Jiefang Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China.
| | - Tao Xiong
- Neurology Department, The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, No. 5, Xianzheng Street, Hanyang District, Wuhan, Hubei 430050, China.
| | - Shu-Chuen Li
- School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, MS 108, Medical Sciences Building, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ávila M, Becerra V, Guedea F, Suárez JF, Fernandez P, Macías V, Mariño A, Hervás A, Herruzo I, Ortiz MJ, Ponce de León J, Sancho G, Cunillera O, Pardo Y, Cots F, Ferrer M. Estimating preferences for treatments in patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 91:277-87. [PMID: 25491504 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies of patients' preferences for localized prostate cancer treatments have assessed radical prostatectomy and external radiation therapy, but none of them has evaluated brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to assess the preferences and willingness to pay of patients with localized prostate cancer who had been treated with radical prostatectomy, external radiation therapy, or brachytherapy, and their related urinary, sexual, and bowel side effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was an observational, prospective cohort study with follow-up until 5 years after treatment. A total of 704 patients with low or intermediate risk localized prostate cancer were consecutively recruited from 2003 to 2005. The estimation of preferences was conducted using time trade-off, standard gamble, and willingness-to-pay methods. Side effects were measured with the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC), a prostate cancer-specific questionnaire. Tobit models were constructed to assess the impact of treatment and side effects on patients' preferences. Propensity score was applied to adjust for treatment selection bias. RESULTS Of the 580 patients reporting preferences, 165 were treated with radical prostatectomy, 152 with external radiation therapy, and 263 with brachytherapy. Both time trade-off and standard gamble results indicated that the preferences of patients treated with brachytherapy were 0.06 utilities higher than those treated with radical prostatectomy (P=.01). Similarly, willingness-to-pay responses showed a difference of €57/month (P=.004) between these 2 treatments. Severe urinary incontinence presented an independent impact on the preferences elicited (P<.05), whereas no significant differences were found by bowel and sexual side effects. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that urinary incontinence is the side effect with the highest impact on preferences and that brachytherapy and external radiation therapy are more valued than radical prostatectomy. These time trade-off and standard gamble preference assessments as well as the willingness-to-pay estimation could be useful to perform respectively cost-utility or cost-benefit analyses, which can guide health policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Ávila
- Health Services Research Unit, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Becerra
- Health Services Research Unit, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Guedea
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - José Francisco Suárez
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Pablo Fernandez
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Instituto Oncológico de Guipúzcoa, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Víctor Macías
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Institut Oncologic del Valles-Hospital General de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
| | - Alfonso Mariño
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Centro Oncológico de Galicia, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Asunción Hervás
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ismael Herruzo
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Regional Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| | - María José Ortiz
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Gemma Sancho
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Cunillera
- Health Services Research Unit, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yolanda Pardo
- Health Services Research Unit, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Francesc Cots
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group, Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Health Services Research Unit, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|