Treatment Satisfaction In Patients With Venous Thromboembolism As Measured With Pact-Q2: Prefer In Vte Registry

The Birmingham and Black Country cohort of Venous Thromboembolism (BBC-VTE) registry: Rationale, design and preliminary results

The Birmingham Black Country Venous Thromboembolism registry (BBC-VTE) is a multi-ethnic cohort of patients who suffered a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and were admitted to various hospital sites across the West Midlands and Black Country regions in the United Kingdom. The BBC-VTE registry is a retrospective, observational cohort study which aims to collect data on outcomes including mortality, bleeding and VTE recurrence in this patient cohort. In addition, the comprehensive, structured data collected will allow us to conduct machine learning analyses for risk prediction in such patients and also to compare to previously derived mortality scores such as the PESI and the simplified PESI (sPESI). Our registry included 2183 patients admitted to hospital between the years 2012-14 and 2016-18 with a first episode of VTE and the mean follow up was 36 months. The cohort was ethnically diverse with 72.5% white Caucasian, 8.2% Asian (including South Asian), 6.7% black, and 11.7% of unknown/other ethnicity. Of those admitted during the collection period 56% had PE, 40% had DVT, with the rest presenting with both PE and DVT. Around 7% of patients went on to develop a bleeding episode and 36% died (all-cause mortality). Of the deaths, 10% of patients died within 30-days of admission (30-day mortality), with 16% dying within 90 days. In summary, this study investigates real-world outcomes of patients after the first index VTE event and attempts to bridge the gap in evidence for contemporary data in this population which will allow to construct more accurate risk prediction tools and management decisions.

Comparing quality of life and treatment satisfaction between patients on warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Patient quality of life (QOL) while on long-term oral anticoagulant therapy has been receiving greater attention in recent years due to the increase in life expectancy brought about by advances in medical care. This study aimed to compare the QOL, treatment satisfaction, hospitalization and bleeding rate in patients on long-term warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) on long-term anticoagulant therapy attending the cardiology clinic and anticoagulation clinic of the University Malaya Medical Centre from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. Patient QOL was assessed by using the Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF12), while treatment satisfaction was assessed by using the Perception of Anticoagulation Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2).

RESULTS

A total of 208 patients were recruited; 52.4% received warfarin and 47.6% received DOAC. There was no significant difference in QOL between warfarin and DOAC based on SF12 (physical QOL, P=0.083; mental QOL, P=0.665). Nevertheless, patients in the DOAC group were significantly more satisfied with their treatment compared to the warfarin group based on PACT-Q2 (P=0.004). The hospitalisation rate was significantly higher in the warfarin group than the DOAC group (15.6% versus 3.0%, P=0.002). Clinically relevant minor bleeds and severe bleeding events were non-significantly higher in the warfarin group than the DOAC group (66.7% versus 40.0%, P=0.069).

CONCLUSION

Compared to warfarin, treatment of NVAF and VTE with DOAC showed comparable QOL, higher treatment satisfaction, lesser hospitalization, and a non-significant trend toward fewer bleeding episodes.

Assessment of quality of life, satisfaction with anticoagulation therapy, and adherence to treatment in patients receiving long-course vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown non-inferiority and ease of use compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). No study so far has been directed toward real-life experience of outpatients receiving anticoagulants for VTE in France.

METHODS

This is an observational descriptive real-life epidemiological study, using three validated questionnaires (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8, EQ-5D, and part 2 of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire), to assess adherence, quality of life, and satisfaction in 100 VTE outpatients receiving anticoagulation therapy by VKA (primary or switched from DOAC to VKA) or by DOAC (primary or switched from VKA to DOAC).

RESULTS

Patients were very much satisfied with their treatment in both DOAC and VKA groups. Despite advantages of DOACs, therapeutic adherence was only moderate. The best adherence scores were observed in the primary VKA switched to DOAC for at least 3 months (S-DOAC) subgroup. Quality of life was better in the DOAC group mainly because of the absence of the requirement for blood testing. Most of the complaints concerned the pain/discomfort dimension in the VKA group and anxiety/depression dimension in the DOAC group.

CONCLUSION

Patients were satisfied with their anticoagulant treatment, especially when they were involved in choosing the anticoagulant, and the treatment suited them. Quality of life of patients in the DOAC group was better than in the VKA group, but adherence remains to be improved. This study highlights the importance of the physician-patient relationship, pretreatment initiation, and follow-up of any anticoagulation therapy throughout.