Concepts and Instruments for Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment in Celiac Disease: Literature Review and Experts' Perspectives

New developments in celiac disease treatments

Celiac disease (CeD), an autoimmune disorder triggered by gluten, affects around 1% of the global population. Standard treatment is a strict gluten-free diet (GFD), which poses significant challenges due to dietary restrictions, cross-contamination and subsequent persistent intestinal inflammation. This underscores the need for new treatment options addressing the complex pathophysiology of CeD. Recent research focuses on developing drugs that target intestinal barrier regeneration, gluten peptide modification, immune response alteration, and gut microbial ecosystem modulation. These approaches offer potential for more effective management of CeD beyond GFD. Gluten-independent treatments may be particularly relevant under the FDA's draft guidance for CeD, which emphasizes drug development as an adjunct to GFD for patients with ongoing signs and symptoms of CeD despite strict GFD.

Evolution in coeliac disease diagnosis and management

The traditional gut-centric view of coeliac disease is evolving as immune and genetic insights underscore the central importance of a systemic, T cell immune response to gluten in disease pathogenesis. As the field increasingly recognize the limitations of small intestinal histology as the diagnostic standard, data supporting the accuracy of an immune (serologic) diagnosis of coeliac disease - well demonstrated in children - are growing for adults. Novel biomarkers such as interleukin-2 that identify the gluten-specific T cell demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for coeliac disease and offer the potential for a diagnostic approach that avoids the need for gluten challenge. Asymptomatic disease and manifestations outside the gut pose considerable challenges for diagnosis using a case-finding strategy and enthusiasm for population screening is growing. The gluten-free diet remains a highly restrictive treatment and there is a paucity of controlled data to inform a safe gluten intake threshold. Ongoing symptoms and enteropathy are common and require systematic evaluation. Slowly-responsive disease is prevalent in the older patient diagnosed with coeliac disease, and super-sensitivity to gluten is an emerging concept that may explain many cases of nonresponsive disease. While there is great interest in developing novel therapies for coeliac disease, no drug has yet been registered. Efficacy studies are generally assessing drugs in patients with treated coeliac disease who undergo gluten challenge or in patients with nonresponsive disease; however, substantial questions remain around specific endpoints relevant for patients, clinicians and regulatory agencies and optimal trial design. Novel immune tools are providing informative readouts for clinical trials and are now shaping their design.

Clinical Presentation and Spectrum of Gluten Symptomatology in Celiac Disease

Views on the clinical presentation and symptomatology of celiac disease have evolved alongside advances in disease detection and understanding of disease pathogenesis. Although historically regarded as a pediatric illness characterized by malabsorption, it is now better viewed as an immune illness of gluten-specific T cells with systemic manifestations affecting all ages. Its broad presentation, including frequent extraintestinal manifestations and asymptomatic disease, contributes to suboptimal disease detection. Adverse symptoms greatly impact patient quality of life and can result from chronic gluten exposure in untreated disease or those poorly responsive to the gluten-free diet. They can also present as acute symptoms after episodic gluten exposure. Functional gastrointestinal disease is a common comorbidity. Biomarkers like interleukin-2 that are highly sensitive and specific for celiac disease highlight a role for gluten-specific T cells in acute gluten symptomatology. A mechanistic understanding of symptoms will inform approaches to better measure and treat them effectively.

Prevalence and identification of neuropsychiatric symptoms in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: an international mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE

A limited range of neuropsychiatric symptoms have been reported in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), with varied symptom prevalence. This study aimed to investigate a wider range of potential symptoms than previous studies, compare patient self-reports with clinician estimates, and explore barriers to symptom identification.

METHODS

Mixed methods were used. Data from SARDs patients (n = 1853) were compared with controls (n = 463) and clinicians (n = 289). In-depth interviews (n = 113) were analysed thematically. Statistical tests compared means of survey items between patients and controls, 8 different SARD groups, and clinician specialities.

RESULTS

Self-reported lifetime prevalences of all 30 neuropsychiatric symptoms investigated (including cognitive, sensorimotor and psychiatric) were significantly higher in SARDs than controls. Validated instruments assessed 55% of SARDs patients as currently having depression and 57% anxiety. Barriers to identifying neuropsychiatric symptoms included: (i) limits to knowledge, guidelines, objective tests and inter-speciality cooperation; (ii) subjectivity, invisibility and believability of symptoms; and (iii) under-eliciting, under-reporting and under-documenting. A lower proportion of clinicians (4%) reported never/rarely asking patients about mental health symptoms than the 74% of patients who reported never/rarely being asked in clinic (P < 0.001). Over 50% of SARDs patients had never/rarely reported their mental health symptoms to clinicians, a proportion underestimated at <10% by clinicians (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Neuropsychiatric symptom self-reported prevalences are significantly higher in SARDs than controls, and are greatly underestimated by most clinicians. Research relying on medical records and current guidelines is unlikely to accurately reflect patients' experiences of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Improved inter-speciality communication and greater patient involvement is needed in SARD care and research.

Development and validation of a brain fog scale for coeliac disease

BACKGROUND

Brain fog is a subjective cognitive impairment commonly reported in coeliac disease. A standardised tool to define and assess it is an important unmet need.

AIMS

To develop a patient-informed tool to assess brain fog in coeliac disease to support clinical care, research and drug development.

METHODS

A pilot online study defined patient descriptors of brain fog. A second study evaluated the factor structure and performance of the scale across two-time points ('Now' and in the 'Past week'). One month later, participants were invited to repeat the study with two online cognitive processing tests, the Stroop task and the trail making test.

RESULTS

Among adults with treated coeliac disease, 37 (91.9% F) participated in the pilot study and 510 (88.8% F) in the second study of whom 99 repeated the study 1 month later with 51 completing cognitive testing. The most common brain fog descriptors were 'difficulty focusing', 'difficulty thinking' and 'difficulty finding the right words and communicating'. The 12-item scale reflects 'cognitive impairment' and 'somatic and affective experience' and demonstrates strong psychometric properties. It tracked with patients report of brain fog being present or absent across two-time points. It did not significantly correlate with the cognitive tests.

CONCLUSION

The brain fog assessment and severity scale is the first patient-informed clinical outcomes assessment tool measuring brain fog in coeliac disease. It is brief and validated for two time-based formats. Further research coupling it with biomarker discovery is needed to confirm its validity as a predictor of cognitive performance.

Standardizing Randomized Controlled Trials in Celiac Disease: An International Multidisciplinary Appropriateness Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is a need to develop safe and effective pharmacologic options for the treatment of celiac disease (CeD); however, consensus on the appropriate design and configuration of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this population is lacking.

METHODS

A 2-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method study was conducted. Eighteen gastroenterologists (adult and pediatric) and gastrointestinal pathologists voted on statements pertaining to the configuration of CeD RCTs, inclusion and exclusion criteria, gluten challenge, and trial outcomes. Two RCT designs were considered, representing the following distinct clinical scenarios for which pharmacotherapy may be used: trials incorporating a gluten challenge to simulate exposure; and trials evaluating reversal of histologic changes, despite attempted adherence to a gluten-free diet. Each statement was rated as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate, using a 9-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

For trials evaluating prevention of relapse after gluten challenge, participants adherent to a gluten-free diet for 12 months or more with normal or near-normal-sized villi should be enrolled. Gluten challenge should be FODMAPS (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) free, and efficacy evaluated using histology with a secondary patient-reported outcome measure. For trials evaluating reversal of villus atrophy, the panel voted it appropriate to enroll participants with a baseline villus height to crypt depth ratio ≤2 and measure efficacy using a primary histologic end point. Guidance for measuring histologic, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes in adult and pediatric patients with CeD are provided, along with recommendations regarding the merits and limitations of different end points.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed standardized recommendations for clinical trial design, eligibility criteria, outcome measures, gluten challenge, and disease evaluations for RCTs in patients with CeD.

Health utilities and willingness to pay in adult patients with coeliac disease in Hungary

BACKGROUND

Coeliac disease (CD) is a life-long food-related disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 1%. Patients with CD often experience reduced health-related quality of life that could improve with a strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD).

OBJECTIVES

To obtain visual analogue scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO) and willingness-to-pay (WTP) values amongst patients with CD.

METHODS

In 2020-2021, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted amongst 312 adult CD patients in Hungary. Patients completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and evaluated their current health and three hypothetical health state vignettes defined based on dietary adherence using VAS, conventional 10-year TTO and WTP. Multivariate regressions were used to explore the effect of patients' demographic and clinical characteristics on utility and WTP values.

RESULTS

Mean VAS values for current health and 'CD with strict adherence to GFD', 'CD with loose adherence to GFD' and 'CD without GFD' hypothetical health states were 79.69 ± 18.52, 85.36 ± 16.18, 62.44 ± 19.91 and 36.69 ± 25.83, respectively. Corresponding mean TTO utilities were: 0.90 ± 0.19, 0.91 ± 0.20, 0.87 ± 0.23 and 0.76 ± 0.29. Mean annual WTP values for returning to full health were: €845 ± 1077, €648 ± 1002, €862 ± 1135 and €1251 ± 1496. Older age at diagnosis, male sex, more severe gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS) and having comorbidities were associated with lower VAS and TTO or higher WTP values for current own health (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to report TTO utilities for CD health states. Strict adherence to the GFD may result in substantial health gains in symptomatic patients. Utilities and WTP results can be used to estimate benefits of GFD in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses.

Efficacy and safety of gluten peptide-based antigen-specific immunotherapy (Nexvax2) in adults with coeliac disease after bolus exposure to gluten (RESET CeD): an interim analysis of a terminated randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

A gluten-free diet is insufficient to treat coeliac disease because intestinal injury persists and acute reactions with cytokine release follow gluten exposure. Nexvax2 is a specific immunotherapy using immunodominant peptides recognised by gluten-specific CD4⁺ T cells that might modify gluten-induced disease in coeliac disease. We aimed to assess the effects of Nexvax2 on gluten-induced symptoms and immune activation in patients with coeliac disease.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial done at 41 sites (29 community, one secondary, and 11 tertiary centres) in the USA, Australia, and New Zealand. Patients with coeliac disease aged 18-70 years who had excluded gluten for at least 1 year, were HLA-DQ2.5 positive, and had a worsening of symptoms after an unmasked 10 g vital gluten challenge were eligible for inclusion. Patients were stratified by HLA-DQ2.5 status (HLA-DQ2.5 non-homozygous vs homozygous). Patients who were non-homozygous were centrally (ICON; Dublin, Ireland) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous Nexvax2 (non-homozygous Nexvax2 group) or saline (0·9% sodium chloride; non-homozygous placebo group) twice a week escalating from 1 μg to 750 μg during the first 5 weeks followed by 11 weeks of maintenance therapy at 900 μg per dose. The exploratory homozygous group was centrally randomly assigned (2:1) to receive Nexvax2 (homozygous Nexvax2 group) or placebo (homozygous placebo group); patients who were homozygous received the same doseage as those who were non-homozygous. The primary endpoint was change in coeliac disease patient reported outcomes (total gastrointestinal domain) from pretreatment baseline to the day of masked bolus 10 g vital gluten challenge given in week 14 analysed in the non-homozygous intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03644069.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 21, 2018, and April 24, 2019, 383 volunteers were screened for inclusion, of whom 179 (47%; 133 [74%] women, 46 [26%] men; median age 41 years [IQR 33-55]) were randomly assigned. One (1%) of 179 patients was excluded from analysis due to misassignment of genotype. The non-homozygous Nexvax2 group included 76 patients, the non-homozygous placebo group included 78 patients, the homozygous Nexvax2 group included 16 patients, and the homozygous placebo group included eight patients. The study was discontinued after planned interim analysis of 66 patients who were non-homozygous. We report an unmasked post-hoc analysis of all available data for the primary endpoint and secondary symptom-based endpoints combining data from 67 (66 were assessed in the planned interim analysis for the primary endpoint). Mean change from baseline to day of first masked gluten challenge in total gastrointestinal score for the non-homozygous Nexvax2 group was 2·86 (SD 2·28) compared with 2·63 (2·07) for the non-homozygous placebo group (p=0·43). Adverse events were similar between all patients who received Nexvax2 and those who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported in five (3%) of 178 patients (two [2%] of 92 who received Nexvax2 and three [4%] of 82 who received placebo). One patient in the non-homozygous Nexvax2 group had a serious adverse event that occurred during gluten challenge (left-sided mid-back muscle strain with imaging suggestive of partial left kidney infarction). Serious adverse events were reported for three (4%) of 78 patients in the non-homozygous placebo group (one each with exacerbation of asthma and appendicitis, and one who had forehead abscess, conjunctivitis, and folliculitis) and one (1%) patient in the non-homozygous Nexvax2 group developed a pulmonary embolism. The most frequent adverse events in all 92 patients who received Nexvax2 compared with all 86 patients who received placebo were nausea (44 [48%] of 92 patients who received Nexvax2 vs 29 (34%) of 86 patients who received placebo), diarrhoea (32 [35%] vs 25 [29%]), abdominal pain (31 [34%] vs 27 [31%]), headache 32 [35%] vs 20 [23%]), and fatigue (24 [26%] vs 31 [36%]).

INTERPRETATION

Nexvax2 did not reduce acute gluten-induced symptoms. Masked bolus vital gluten challenge provides an alternative to extended gluten challenge in efficacy studies for coeliac disease.

FUNDING

ImmusanT.

Latiglutenase Protects the Mucosa and Attenuates Symptom Severity in Patients With Celiac Disease Exposed to a Gluten Challenge

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gluten ingestion in patients with celiac disease can lead to gastrointestinal symptoms and small intestinal mucosal injury.

METHODS

This gluten challenge phase 2 trial was double blind and placebo controlled, and it assessed the efficacy and safety of a 1200-mg dose of IMGX003 in patients with celiac disease exposed to 2 g of gluten per day for 6 weeks. The change in the ratio of villus height to crypt depth was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included density of intraepithelial lymphocytes and symptom severity. These endpoints were evaluated by analysis of covariance. Additional endpoints included serology and gluten-immunogenic peptides in urine.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were randomized, and 43 patients completed the study (IMGX003, n = 21; placebo, n = 22). The mean change in the ratio of villus height to crypt depth (primary endpoint) for IMGX003 vs placebo was -0.04 vs -0.35 (P = .057). The mean change in the density of intraepithelial lymphocytes (secondary endpoint) for IMGX003 vs placebo was 9.8 vs 24.8 cells/mm epithelium (P = .018). The mean change (worsening) in symptom severity in relative units (secondary endpoint) for IMGX003 vs placebo was 0.22 vs 1.63 (abdominal pain, P = .231), 0.96 vs 3.29 (bloating, P = .204), and 0.02 vs 3.20 (tiredness, P = .113). The 3 × 2-week trend line significance values for these symptoms, respectively, were P = .014, .030, and .002.

CONCLUSIONS

IMGX003 reduced gluten-induced intestinal mucosal damage and symptom severity. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03585478).

Application of a Platform for Gluten-Free Diet Evaluation and Dietary Advice: From Theory to Practice

The present work aimed to analyze, through the GlutenFreeDiet digital platform, the evolution over one year of the nutritional status, dietary profile and symptoms present among celiac people on a gluten-free diet (GFD) while receiving individualized dietary advice. Twenty-seven adults and thirty-one celiac children/adolescents participated in the study. This was then followed up by three visits, at diagnosis, and after 3 and 12 months (vt0, vt3 and vt12). Participants filled out dietary and gastrointestinal symptoms questionnaires. All patients received written personalized dietary advice from dietitians who interpreted data from the platform. Results obtained indicated that participants consumed proteins and lipids in excess and carbohydrates in defect. Low intakes of cereals, fruit and vegetables and high meat intakes were observed. However, gluten-free product (GFP) consumption and that of ultra-processed foods was reduced after 1 year in adults. Symptoms decreased after vt3 but recurred in vt12. Changes in ultra-processed foods and GFP intake, but lack of changes in the rest of the parameters suggested that the platform support was not effective enough. Even though the platform represents a useful tool for monitoring celiac patients and giving dietary advice, modules that require more continuous attention and nutritional education of patients should be provided for interventions to be more effective.