1
|
Salisbury A, Pearce A, Howard K, Norris S. Impact of Structural Differences on the Modeled Cost-Effectiveness of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. Med Decis Making 2024:272989X241263368. [PMID: 39092556 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241263368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was developed to improve the accuracy of prenatal screening to detect chromosomal abnormalities. Published economic analyses have yielded different incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs), leading to conclusions of NIPT being dominant, cost-effective, and cost-ineffective. These analyses have used different model structures, and the extent to which these structural variations have contributed to differences in ICERs is unclear. AIM To assess the impact of different model structures on the cost-effectiveness of NIPT for the detection of trisomy 21 (T21; Down syndrome). METHODS A systematic review identified economic models comparing NIPT to conventional screening. The key variations in identified model structures were the number of health states and modeling approach. New models with different structures were developed in TreeAge and populated with consistent parameters to enable a comparison of the impact of selected structural variations on results. RESULTS The review identified 34 economic models. Based on these findings, demonstration models were developed: 1) a decision tree with 3 health states, 2) a decision tree with 5 health states, 3) a microsimulation with 3 health states, and 4) a microsimulation with 5 health states. The base-case ICER from each model was 1) USD$34,474 (2023)/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), 2) USD$14,990 (2023)/QALY, (3) USD$54,983 (2023)/QALY, and (4) NIPT was dominated. CONCLUSION Model-structuring choices can have a large impact on the ICER and conclusions regarding cost-effectiveness, which may inadvertently affect policy decisions to support or not support funding for NIPT. The use of reference models could improve international consistency in health policy decision making for prenatal screening. HIGHLIGHTS NIPT is a clinical area in which a variety of modeling approaches have been published, with wide variation in reported cost-effectiveness.This study shows that when broader contextual factors are held constant, varying the model structure yields results that range from NIPT being less effective and more expensive than conventional screening (i.e., NIPT was dominated) through to NIPT being more effective and more expensive than conventional screening with an ICER of USD$54,983 (2023)/QALY.Model-structuring choices may inadvertently affect policy decisions to support or not support funding of NIPT. Reference models could improve international consistency in health policy decision making for prenatal screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Salisbury
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alison Pearce
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Norris
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Basu A, Winn AN, Johnson KM, Jiao B, Devine B, Hankins JS, Arnold SD, Bender MA, Ramsey SD. Gene Therapy Versus Common Care for Eligible Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease in the United States : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:155-164. [PMID: 38252942 DOI: 10.7326/m23-1520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sickle cell disease (SCD) and its complications contribute to high rates of morbidity and early mortality and high cost in the United States and African heritage community. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of gene therapy for SCD and its value-based prices (VBPs). DESIGN Comparative modeling analysis across 2 independently developed simulation models (University of Washington Model for Economic Analysis of Sickle Cell Cure [UW-MEASURE] and Fred Hutchinson Institute Sickle Cell Disease Outcomes Research and Economics Model [FH-HISCORE]) using the same databases. DATA SOURCES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims data, 2008 to 2016; published literature. TARGET POPULATION Persons eligible for gene therapy. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE U.S. health care sector and societal. INTERVENTION Gene therapy versus common care. OUTCOME MEASURES Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), equity-informed VBPs, and price acceptability curves. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS At an assumed $2 million price for gene therapy, UW-MEASURE and FH-HISCORE estimated ICERs of $193 000 per QALY and $427 000 per QALY, respectively, under the health care sector perspective. Corresponding estimates from the societal perspective were $126 000 per QALY and $281 000 per QALY. The difference in results between models stemmed primarily from considering a slightly different target population and incorporating the quality-of-life (QOL) effects of splenic sequestration, priapism, and acute chest syndrome in the UW model. From a societal perspective, acceptable (>90% confidence) VBPs ranged from $1 million to $2.5 million depending on the use of alternative effective metrics or equity-informed threshold values. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Results were sensitive to the costs of myeloablative conditioning before gene therapy, effect on caregiver QOL, and effect of gene therapy on long-term survival. LIMITATION The short-term effects of gene therapy on vaso-occlusive events were extrapolated from 1 study. CONCLUSION Gene therapy for SCD below a $2 million price tag is likely to be cost-effective when applying a societal perspective at an equity-informed threshold for cost-effectiveness analysis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirban Basu
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy; Department of Health Systems and Population Health; and Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (A.B.)
| | - Aaron N Winn
- Pharmacy Administration, Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (A.N.W.)
| | - Kate M Johnson
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (K.M.J.)
| | - Boshen Jiao
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, and Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (B.J.)
| | - Beth Devine
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, and Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (B.D.)
| | - Jane S Hankins
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine and Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (J.S.H.)
| | - Staci D Arnold
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (S.D.A.)
| | - M A Bender
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, and Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (M.A.B.)
| | - Scott D Ramsey
- Division of Public Health Sciences and Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, and Pharmacy Administration, Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (S.D.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Merlin T, Street J, Carter D, Haji Ali Afzali H. Challenges in the Evaluation of Emerging Highly Specialised Technologies: Is There a Role for Living HTA? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:823-830. [PMID: 37824056 PMCID: PMC10628011 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00835-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
There is currently deep uncertainty about the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of highly specialised technologies (HSTs), like gene and cell therapies. These treatments are novel, typically have high upfront costs, the patient populations are small and heterogenous, there is minimal information on their long-term safety and effectiveness, and data are limited and often of poor quality. With the increasing number of these technologies and their high cost burden on governments and health care providers, policy makers are currently walking a decision tightrope. On the one hand, an unfavourable funding decision could potentially limit patient access to life-saving treatments, while on the other, a favourable decision could result in unsustainable budget impacts and perhaps poorer patient health outcomes. Health technology assessment (HTA) is meant to determine the value of a health technology in order to promote an equitable, efficient, and high-quality health system. However, standard HTA processes have failed to mitigate the deep uncertainties associated with these technologies. In this paper, we propose a Living HTA framework to address these challenges. This framework includes a one-off process for making explicit the societal values associated with HSTs. These would inform the decision-making approach, data collection and the development of disease-specific reference models to be used by industry sponsors as the basis for their submissions for public funding. Coverage with an evidence development mechanism is also proposed by which data can be collected in real time to update the reference model on a rolling basis, thereby allowing re-assessment of the clinical and cost effectiveness of individual HSTs. The HTA would be 'live' until the results indicate there is sufficient certainty for the funding decision to be confirmed, the price changed or the funding removed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Merlin
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Jackie Street
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Drew Carter
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Hossein Haji Ali Afzali
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnson KM, Jiao B, Bender MA, Ramsey SD, Devine B, Basu A. Development of a conceptual model for evaluating new non-curative and curative therapies for sickle cell disease. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267448. [PMID: 35482721 PMCID: PMC9049306 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with many acute and chronic complications driven by ongoing vaso-occlusion and hemolysis. It causes a disproportionate burden on Black and Hispanic communities. Our objective was to follow the SMDM/ISPOR Task Force recommendations for good practices and create a conceptual model of the progression of SCD under current clinical practice to inform cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of promising curative therapies in the pipeline over a lifetime horizon. METHODS We used consultations with experts, providers, and patients to identify acute events and chronic conditions in the conceptual model. We compared our model structure to previous CEA models of interventions for SCD, assessed the prevalence of the identified disease attributes in Medicaid and Medicare claims databases, and identified relevant outcomes following the 2nd Panel in CEA. We determined an appropriate modeling technique and relevant data sources for parameterizing the model. RESULTS The conceptual model structure included four dimensions of disease: chronic pain, acute events, chronic conditions, and treatment complications, spanning 26 disease attributes with significant impacts on health-related quality of life and resource. We modeled chronic pain separately to reflect its importance to patients and interaction with all other disease attributes. We identified additional data sources for health state utilities and non-medical costs and benefits of SCD. We will use a microsimulation model with age- and sex-specific transitions between health states predicted by patient demographic characteristics and disease history. CONCLUSION Developing the model structure through an explicit process of model conceptualization can increase the transparency and accuracy of results. We will populate the conceptual model with the data sources described and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of curative therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate M. Johnson
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Boshen Jiao
- Department of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - M. A. Bender
- Clinical Research Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Scott D. Ramsey
- Department of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Division of Public Health Sciences and Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Beth Devine
- Department of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Anirban Basu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health and Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|