1
|
de Heide J, van der Graaf M, Holl MJ, Hoogendijk MG, Bhagwandien RE, Wijchers SA, Theuns DAMJ, Szili-Torok T, Zijlstra F, Lenzen MJ, Yap SC. Device infection in patients undergoing pacemaker or defibrillator surgery: risk stratification using the PADIT score. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:1419-1426. [PMID: 38286881 PMCID: PMC11379746 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01759-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of an antibacterial envelope is cost-effective for patients at high risk of developing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. The identification of these high-risk patients may be facilitated using a clinical risk score. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the PADIT score for identifying high-risk patients in patients undergoing a CIED procedure in a tertiary academic center. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center study of consecutive patients undergoing a CIED procedure between January 2016 and November 2021. Patients who received an antibacterial envelope were excluded from this study. The primary endpoint was hospitalization for a CIED infection in the first year after the procedure. RESULTS A total of 2333 CIED procedures were performed in the study period (mean age 61.6 ± 16.3 years, male sex 64.5%, previous CIED infection 1.7%, immunocompromised 5.4%). The median PADIT score was 4 (interquartile range, 2-6). CIED infection occurred in 10 patients (0.43%). The PADIT score had good discrimination in predicting major CIED infection (C-statistic 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54 to 0.86, P = 0.03). Using an optimal PADIT score cut-off value of 7, the risk of CIED infection was higher in the patients with a PADIT score of ≥ 7 in comparison to those with a lower PADIT score (1.23% vs. 0.26%, P = 0.02; odds ratio 4.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 16.6, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The PADIT score is a clinically useful score for identifying patients at high risk of developing CIED infection. The use of an antibacterial envelope in these high-risk patients may be cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John de Heide
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marisa van der Graaf
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marijn J Holl
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark G Hoogendijk
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rohit E Bhagwandien
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sip A Wijchers
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dominic A M J Theuns
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tamas Szili-Torok
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Felix Zijlstra
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mattie J Lenzen
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sing-Chien Yap
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Messori A, Romeo MR, Rivano M, Trippoli S. Real-world data on the effectiveness of TYRX and TauroPace for preventing CIED infections. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE 2024; 14:220-229. [PMID: 39309111 PMCID: PMC11410787 DOI: 10.62347/dshg1684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) carries a known risk of infection. Two devices (TYRX and TauroPace) have been proposed to reduce this risk. METHODS The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of TauroPace and TYRX. Real-world comparative studies were included. Data analysis was based on reconstruction of individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves using an artificial intelligence algorithm. The endpoint was CIED infection or systemic infection. Statistical tests included heterogeneity assessment, superiority testing, and non-inferiority testing. The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio (HR) with confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Our literature search identified two real-world studies suitable for our analysis. Follow-up was 12 months for TauroPace (654 patients) and 60 months for TYRX (872 patients), with a total of 2,083 controls. There was no heterogeneity among controls. Compared to the pooled control group, patients treated with TYRX or TauroPace had fewer CIED infections (HR, 0.3892; 95% CI, 0.2042-0.7419; P=0.00414; HR, 0.3313; 95% CI, 0.1005-1.0925; P=0.06958, respectively). When testing for non-inferiority of TauroPace vs. TYRX, the comparison yielded a HR of 0.8494 (in favor of TYRX) with a 90% CI of 0.27-2.63; this CI of TauroPace did not meet the non-inferiority criterion set at HR>0.75 (i.e., relative difference ≤25%). CONCLUSIONS Both treatments had some important drawbacks. Regarding TYRX, more selective use in higher-risk patients should be advocated to improve its cost-effectiveness, but robust evidence is still lacking. Regarding TauroPace, our analysis testing for a non-inferiority margin of ≤25% did not meet this demonstration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Messori
- Centro Operativo HTA, Regional Health ServiceRegione Toscana, Firenze, Italy
| | | | | | - Sabrina Trippoli
- Centro Operativo HTA, Regional Health ServiceRegione Toscana, Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maclean E, Mahtani K, Honarbakhsh S, Butcher C, Ahluwalia N, Dennis AS, Creta A, Finlay M, Elliott M, Mehta V, Wijesuriya N, Shaikh O, Zaw Y, Ogbedeh C, Gautam V, Lambiase PD, Schilling RJ, Earley MJ, Moore P, Muthumala A, Sporton SC, Hunter RJ, Rinaldi CA, Behar J, Martin C, Monkhouse C, Chow A. The BLISTER Score: A Novel, Externally Validated Tool for Predicting Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections, and Its Cost-Utility Implications for Antimicrobial Envelope Use. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2024; 17:e012446. [PMID: 38258308 PMCID: PMC10949977 DOI: 10.1161/circep.123.012446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial envelopes reduce the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device infections, but their cost restricts routine use in the United Kingdom. Risk scoring could help to identify which patients would most benefit from this technology. METHODS A novel risk score (BLISTER [Blood results, Long procedure time, Immunosuppressed, Sixty years old (or younger), Type of procedure, Early re-intervention, Repeat procedure]) was derived from multivariate analysis of factors associated with cardiac implantable electronic device infection. Diagnostic utility was assessed against the existing PADIT score (Prior procedure, Age, Depressed renal function, Immunocompromised, Type of procedure) in both standard and high-risk external validation cohorts, and cost-utility models examined different BLISTER and PADIT score thresholds for TYRX (Medtronic; Minneapolis, MN) antimicrobial envelope allocation. RESULTS In a derivation cohort (n=7383), cardiac implantable electronic device infection occurred in 59 individuals within 12 months of a procedure (event rate, 0.8%). In addition to the PADIT score constituents, lead extraction (hazard ratio, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.9-6.1]; P<0.0001), C-reactive protein >50 mg/L (hazard ratio, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.4-6.4]; P=0.005), reintervention within 2 years (hazard ratio, 10.1 [95% CI, 5.6-17.9]; P<0.0001), and top-quartile procedure duration (hazard ratio, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.6-4.1]; P=0.001) were independent predictors of infection. The BLISTER score demonstrated superior discriminative performance versus PADIT in the standard risk (n=2854, event rate: 0.8%, area under the curve, 0.82 versus 0.71; P=0.001) and high-risk validation cohorts (n=1961, event rate: 2.0%, area under the curve, 0.77 versus 0.69; P=0.001), and in all patients (n=12 198, event rate: 1%, area under the curve, 0.8 versus 0.75, P=0.002). In decision-analytic modeling, the optimum scenario assigned antimicrobial envelopes to patients with BLISTER scores ≥6 (10.8%), delivering a significant reduction in infections (relative risk reduction, 30%; P=0.036) within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-utility thresholds (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, £18 446). CONCLUSIONS The BLISTER score (https://qxmd.com/calculate/calculator_876/the-blister-score-for-cied-infection) was a valid predictor of cardiac implantable electronic device infection, and could facilitate cost-effective antimicrobial envelope allocation to high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edd Maclean
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (E.M., S.H., N.A., R.J.S., R.J.H., A. Chow)
| | - Karishma Mahtani
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Shohreh Honarbakhsh
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (E.M., S.H., N.A., R.J.S., R.J.H., A. Chow)
| | - Charles Butcher
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Nikhil Ahluwalia
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (E.M., S.H., N.A., R.J.S., R.J.H., A. Chow)
| | - Adam S.C. Dennis
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Antonio Creta
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Malcolm Finlay
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Mark Elliott
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom (M.E., V.M., N.W., C.A.R., J.B.)
| | - Vishal Mehta
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom (M.E., V.M., N.W., C.A.R., J.B.)
| | - Nadeev Wijesuriya
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom (M.E., V.M., N.W., C.A.R., J.B.)
| | - Omar Shaikh
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom (O.S., Y.Z., C.O., V.G., C. Martin)
| | - Yom Zaw
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom (O.S., Y.Z., C.O., V.G., C. Martin)
| | - Chizute Ogbedeh
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom (O.S., Y.Z., C.O., V.G., C. Martin)
| | - Vasu Gautam
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom (O.S., Y.Z., C.O., V.G., C. Martin)
| | - Pier D. Lambiase
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Richard J. Schilling
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (E.M., S.H., N.A., R.J.S., R.J.H., A. Chow)
| | - Mark J. Earley
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Philip Moore
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Amal Muthumala
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Simon C.E. Sporton
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Ross J. Hunter
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (E.M., S.H., N.A., R.J.S., R.J.H., A. Chow)
| | - Christopher A. Rinaldi
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom (M.E., V.M., N.W., C.A.R., J.B.)
| | - Jonathan Behar
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom (M.E., V.M., N.W., C.A.R., J.B.)
| | - Claire Martin
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom (O.S., Y.Z., C.O., V.G., C. Martin)
| | - Christopher Monkhouse
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
| | - Anthony Chow
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom (E.M., K.M., S.H., C.B., N.A., A.S.C.D., A.C., M.F., P.D.L., R.J.S., M.J.E., P.M., A.M., S.C.E.S., R.J.H., C. Monkhouse, A.C.)
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (E.M., S.H., N.A., R.J.S., R.J.H., A. Chow)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frausing MHJP, Nielsen JC, Westergaard CL, Gerdes C, Kjellberg J, Boriani G, Kronborg MB. Economic analyses in cardiac electrophysiology: from clinical efficacy to cost utility. Europace 2024; 26:euae031. [PMID: 38289720 PMCID: PMC10858642 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiac electrophysiology is an evolving field that relies heavily on costly device- and catheter-based technologies. An increasing number of patients with heart rhythm disorders are becoming eligible for cardiac interventions, not least due to the rising prevalence of atrial fibrillation and increased longevity in the population. Meanwhile, the expansive costs of healthcare face finite societal resources, and a cost-conscious approach to new technologies is critical. Cost-effectiveness analyses support rational decision-making in healthcare by evaluating the ratio of healthcare costs to health benefits for competing therapies. They may, however, be subject to significant uncertainty and bias. This paper aims to introduce the basic concepts, framework, and limitations of cost-effectiveness analyses to clinicians including recent examples from clinical electrophysiology and device therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Hee Jung Park Frausing
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Cosedis Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Caroline Louise Westergaard
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Christian Gerdes
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jakob Kjellberg
- The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Mads Brix Kronborg
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ziacchi M, Biffi M, Iacopino S, di Silvestro M, Marchese P, Miscio F, Caccavo VP, Zanotto G, Tomasi L, Dello Russo A, Donazzan L, Boriani G. REducing INFectiOns thRough Cardiac device Envelope: insight from real world data. The REINFORCE project. Europace 2023; 25:euad224. [PMID: 37490930 PMCID: PMC10637307 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Infections resulting from cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation are severely impacting on patients' and on health care systems. The use of TYRXTM absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope has proven to decrease major CIED infections within 12 months of CIED surgery. The aim is to evaluate the impact of the envelope use on infection-related clinical events in a real-world contemporary patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS Data on patients undergoing CIED surgery were collected prospectively by participating centers of the One Hospital ClinicalService project. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether TYRXTM absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope was used or not. Out of 1819 patients, 872 (47.9%) were implanted with an absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope and included in the Envelope group and 947 (52.1%) patients who did not receive an envelope were included in the Control group. Compared to control, patients in the Envelope group had higher thrombo-embolic or hemorrhagic risk, higher BMI, lower LVEF and more comorbidities. During a mean follow-up of 1.4 years, the incidence of infection-related events was significantly higher in the control compared to the Envelope group (2.4% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.007). The five-year cumulative incidence of infection-related events was 8.1% in the control and 2.1% in the Envelope group (HR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.14-0.80, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION In our analysis, the use of an absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope in the general CIED population was associated with a lower risk of systemic and pocket infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ziacchi
- Institute of Cardiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40125 Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Institute of Cardiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40125 Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luca Donazzan
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Maurizio, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Frausing MHJP, Johansen JB, Afonso D, Jørgensen OD, Olsen T, Gerdes C, Johansen ML, Wolff C, Mealing S, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB. Cost-effectiveness of an antibacterial envelope for infection prevention in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy reoperations in Denmark. Europace 2023; 25:euad159. [PMID: 37345858 PMCID: PMC10286568 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Use of an absorbable antibacterial envelope during implantation prevents cardiac implantable electronic device infections in patients with a moderate-to-high infection risk. Previous studies demonstrated that an envelope is cost-effective in high-risk patients within German, Italian, and English healthcare systems, but these analyses were based on limited data and may not be generalizable to other healthcare settings. METHODS AND RESULTS A previously published decision-tree-based cost-effectiveness model was used to compare the costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) associated with adjunctive use of an antibacterial envelope for infection prevention compared to standard-of-care intravenous antibiotics. The model was adapted using data from a Danish observational two-centre cohort study that investigated infection-risk patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reoperations with and without an antibacterial envelope (n = 1943). We assumed a cost-effectiveness threshold of €34 125/QALY gained, based on the upper threshold used by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (£30 000). An antibacterial envelope was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €12 022 per QALY in patients undergoing CRT reoperations, thus indicating that the envelope is cost-effective when compared with standard of care. A separate analysis stratified by device type showed ICERS of €6227 (CRT defibrillator) and €29 177 (CRT pacemaker) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Cost-effectiveness ratios were favourable for patients undergoing CRT reoperations in the Danish healthcare system, and thus are in line with previous studies. Results from this study can contribute to making the technology available to Danish patients and align preventive efforts in the pacemaker and ICD area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Hee Jung Park Frausing
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Brock Johansen
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Daniela Afonso
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, York Y0105NQ, United Kingdom
| | - Ole Dan Jørgensen
- Department of Cardiac-, Thoracic-, and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Thomas Olsen
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, York Y0105NQ, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Gerdes
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Claudia Wolff
- Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Route du Molliau 31, CH-1131 Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Stuart Mealing
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, York Y0105NQ, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Cosedis Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mads Brix Kronborg
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 82, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ballantyne BA, Chew DS, Vandenberk B. Paradigm Shifts in Cardiac Pacing: Where Have We Been and What Lies Ahead? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082938. [PMID: 37109274 PMCID: PMC10146747 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The history of cardiac pacing dates back to the 1930s with externalized pacing and has evolved to incorporate transvenous, multi-lead, or even leadless devices. Annual implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices have increased since the introduction of the implantable system, likely related to expanding indications, and increasing global life expectancy and aging demographics. Here, we summarize the relevant literature on cardiac pacing to demonstrate the enormous impact it has had within the field of cardiology. Further, we look forward to the future of cardiac pacing, including conduction system pacing and leadless pacing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan A Ballantyne
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Derek S Chew
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Bert Vandenberk
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Imberti JF, Mei DA, Fontanesi R, Gerra L, Bonini N, Vitolo M, Turco V, Casali E, Boriani G. Low Occurrence of Infections and Death in a Real-World Cohort of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. J Clin Med 2023; 12:2599. [PMID: 37048682 PMCID: PMC10095352 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of infections and death in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is not fully known yet. AIM To describe the incidence of CIED-related infection and death, and their potential predictors in a contemporary cohort of CIED patients. METHODS All consecutive patients implanted with a CIED at our institution were prospectively enrolled. Follow-up visits were performed 2 weeks after CIED implantation for all patients, and then every 6 months for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients and every 12 months for pacemaker (PM) patients. The adjudication of CIED-related infections was performed by two independent investigators and potential disagreement was resolved by a senior investigator. RESULTS Between September 2016 and August 2020, a total of 838 patients were enrolled (34.6% female; median age 77 (69.6-83.6); median PADIT score 2 (2-4)). PMs were implanted in 569 (68%) patients and ICD/CRT in 269 (32%) patients. All patients had pre-implant antibiotic prophylaxis and 5.5% had an antibiotic-eluting envelope. Follow-up data were available for 832 (99.2%) patients. After a median follow-up of 42.3 (30.2-56.4) months, five (0.6%) patients had a CIED-related infection and 212 (25.5%) patients died. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis and therapy with corticosteroids was independently associated with a higher risk of infection (hazard ratio (HR): 14.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-136.62 and HR: 14.71; 95% CI 1.53-141.53, respectively). Age (HR: 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.09), end-stage CKD requiring dialysis (HR: 6.13; 95% CI 3.38-11.13) and history of atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.47; 95% CI 1.12-1.94) were independently associated with all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS In a contemporary cohort of CIED patients, mortality was substantially high and associated with clinical factors depicting a population at risk. On the other hand, the incidence of CIED-related infections was low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Francesco Imberti
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Davide Antonio Mei
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Riccardo Fontanesi
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Luigi Gerra
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bonini
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Vitolo
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Turco
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Edoardo Casali
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodríguez-Fernández M, López Cortés LE. Patogenia, factores de riesgo y prevención de las infecciones de dispositivos de estimulación cardiaca. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circv.2022.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
|
10
|
Risk Scores for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: Which One to Believe In? J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216556. [PMID: 36362784 PMCID: PMC9656546 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Infections are important complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), with a high prognostic impact. Several risk factors for CIED infections are known. Different studies have been published proposing different risk scores, in order to preoperatively assess the individual likelihood of developing a CIED infection. Among the different scores, large heterogeneity exists and there is no consensus or convergence on a single score finding large applicability in global practice. The aim of this review is to comprehensively present and analyze all the available risk scores for CIED infection, with particular regard to the evidence of comparison studies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Traykov V, Blomström-Lundqvist C. Antibiotic-Eluting Envelopes for the Prevention of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Rationale, Efficacy, and Cost-Effectiveness. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:855233. [PMID: 35419433 PMCID: PMC8995798 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.855233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Infections related to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite optimal use of antimicrobials and other preventive strategies, the incidence of CIED infections is increasing over time leading to considerable costs to the healthcare systems. Recently, antibiotic-eluting envelopes (AEEs) have been introduced as a promising technology to prevent CIED infections. This review will address the current evidence on stratification of CIED infection risk, present the rationale behind AEE, and summarize the currently available evidence for CIED infection prevention as well as demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of this novel technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassil Traykov
- Department of Invasive Electrophysiology, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Carina Blomström-Lundqvist
- Department of Medical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boriani G, Vitolo M, Svennberg E, Casado-Arroyo R, Merino JL, Leclercq C. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and procedures in cardiac electrophysiology: an innovative perspective. Europace 2022; 24:1541-1547. [PMID: 35531864 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an increasing pressure on demonstrating the value of medical interventions and medical technologies resulting in the proposal of new approaches for implementation in the daily practice of innovative treatments that might carry a substantial cost. While originally mainly adopted by pharmaceutical companies, in recent years medical technology companies have initiated novel value-based arrangements for using medical devices, in the form of 'outcomes-based contracts', 'performance-based contracts', or 'risk-sharing agreements'. These are all characterized by linking coverage, reimbursement, or payment for the innovative treatment to the attainment of pre-specified clinical outcomes. Risk-sharing agreements have been promoted also in the field of electrophysiology and offer the possibility to demonstrate the value of specific innovative technologies proposed in this rapidly advancing field, while relieving hospitals from taking on the whole financial risk themselves. Physicians deeply involved in the field of devices and technologies for arrhythmia management and invasive electrophysiology need to be prepared for involvement as stakeholders. This may imply engagement in the evaluation of risk-sharing agreements and specifically, in the process of assessment of technology performances or patient outcomes. Scientific Associations may have an important role in promoting the basis for value-based assessments, in promoting educational initiatives to help assess the determinants of the learning curve for innovative treatments, and in promoting large-scale registries for a precise assessment of patient outcomes and of specific technologies' performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.,EHRA mHEALTH and Health Economics Section, European Heart Rhythm Association, Biot, France
| | - Marco Vitolo
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.,Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Emma Svennberg
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ruben Casado-Arroyo
- Department of Cardiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Josè L Merino
- Arrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, University Hospital La Paz, Autonoma University, IdiPaz, Clinica Viamed-Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arshad V, Talha KM, Baddour LM. Epidemiology of infective endocarditis: novel aspects in the twenty-first century. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2022; 20:45-54. [PMID: 35081845 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2031980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The epidemiology of infective endocarditis (IE) in this millennium has changed with emergence of new risk factors and reemergence of others. This, coupled with modifications in national guidelines in the setting of a pandemic, prompted an address of the topic. AREAS COVERED Our goal is to provide a contemporary review of IE epidemiology considering changing incidence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD), cardiac device implantation, and injection drug use (IDU), with SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as the backdrop. METHODS PubMed and Google Scholar were used to identify studies of interest. EXPERT OPINION Our experience over the past two decades verifies the notion that there is not one 'textbook' profile of IE. Multiple factors have dramatically impacted IE epidemiology, and these factors differ, based, in part on geography. RHD has declined in many areas of the world, whereas implanted cardiovascular devices-related IE has grown exponentially. Perhaps the most influential, at least in areas of the United States, is injection drug use complicating the opioid epidemic. Healthy younger individuals contracting a potentially life-threatening infection has been tragic. In the past year, epidemiological changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic have also occurred. No doubt, changes will characterize IE in the future and serial review of the topic is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verda Arshad
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Khawaja M Talha
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Larry M Baddour
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ziacchi M, Massaro G, Angeletti A, Statuto G, Diemberger I, Martignani C, Galiè N, Biffi M, Boriani G. Preoperative checklist to reduce the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infections. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2021; 45:262-269. [PMID: 34927271 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection represents a dramatic event with a high mortality rate (>3x) despite antibiotic therapy and device extraction; therefore, the real winning strategy in this situation could be represented by prevention. Antibiotic prophylaxis and antibiotic-releasing envelope are effective in improving patient outcome; however, healthcare costs related to CIED infections remain high over the years. In this review we would keep the attention on a pre-surgical checklist to reduce the risk of CIED infections. In fact, checklist is an effective instrument for medical care quality improvement mainly used in surgery, but not very commonly in cath-lab and electrophysiology procedures. All steps of this checklist are of proven effectiveness in reducing the risk of CIED infections but, up till now, they are not considered together in a pre-surgical approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ziacchi
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Massaro
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Angeletti
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Statuto
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Igor Diemberger
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristian Martignani
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nazzareno Galiè
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Building, S.Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sgreccia D, Vitolo M, Valenti AC, Manicardi M, Boriani G. Burden of disease and costs of infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 22:7-16. [PMID: 34517745 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1980386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infections are complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) procedures, associated with high mortality (20-25% at 1 year), long hospitalizations (23-30 days), and high costs for health-care systems (often higher than 30.000 €). The incidence rates are around 1-4%. Prevention strategies appear to be the best approach for minimizing the occurrence of CIED infections, but in real-world, the recommendations for the best practices are not always followed. Among the recommended preventive measures, the antibacterial envelope has proven to be effective in reducing CIED-related infections. AREAS COVERED Published studies investigate the role of antibacterial envelopes in infection prevention and the use of infection risk scores to select high-risk patients undergoing CIED implantation/replacement who can benefit from additional preventive measures. EXPERT OPINION A proficient selection of the best candidates for the antibacterial envelope can be the basis for reducing the healthcare system's costs, in line with the principles of cost-effectiveness. Risk scores have been developed to select patients at high risk of CIED infections and their use appears simple and more complete than individual factors alone. Among them, the PADIT score seems to be effective in selecting patients eligible for antibacterial envelope insertion, with a good cost-effectiveness profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Sgreccia
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Vitolo
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Valenti
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marcella Manicardi
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tarakji KG, Korantzopoulos P, Philippon F, Biffi M, Mittal S, Poole JE, Kennergren C, Lexcen DR, Lande JD, Seshadri S, Wilkoff BL. Infectious consequences of hematoma from cardiac implantable electronic device procedures and the role of the antibiotic envelope: A WRAP-IT trial analysis. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:2080-2086. [PMID: 34280568 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hematoma is a complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures and may lead to device infection. The TYRX antibacterial envelope reduced major CIED infection by 40% in the randomized WRAP-IT (World-wide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention Trial) study, but its effectiveness in the presence of hematoma is not well understood. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and infectious consequences of hematoma and the association between envelope use, hematomas, and major CIED infection among WRAP-IT patients. METHODS All 6800 study patients were included in this analysis (control 3429; envelope 3371). Hematomas occurring within 30 days postprocedure (acute) were characterized and grouped by study treatment and evaluated for subsequent infection risk. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. RESULTS Acute hematoma incidence was 2.2% at 30 days, with no significant difference between treatment groups (envelope vs control hazard ratio [HR] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.58; P = .39). Through all follow-up, the risk of major infection was significantly higher among control patients with hematoma vs those without (13.1% vs 1.6%; HR 11.3; 95% CI 5.5-23.2; P <.001). The risk of major infection was significantly lower in the envelope vs control patients with hematoma (2.5% vs 13.1%; HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.85; P = .03). CONCLUSION The risk of hematoma was 2.2% among WRAP-IT patients. Among control patients, hematoma carried a >11-fold risk of developing a major CIED infection. This risk was significantly mitigated with antibacterial envelope use, with an 82% reduction in major CIED infection among envelope patients who developed hematoma compared to control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaldoun G Tarakji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Ohio.
| | | | - Francois Philippon
- Electrophysiology Division, Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Québec, Canada
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Policlinico Sant' Orsola, Malpighi, Italy
| | - Suneet Mittal
- Department of Cardiology, Valley Health System, Ridgewood, New Jersey
| | - Jeanne E Poole
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles Kennergren
- First Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Bruce L Wilkoff
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boriani G, Vitolo M, Wright DJ, Biffi M, Brown B, Tarakji KG, Wilkoff BL. Infections associated with cardiac electronic implantable devices: economic perspectives and impact of the TYRX™ antibacterial envelope. Europace 2021; 23:iv33-iv44. [PMID: 34160600 PMCID: PMC8221050 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The occurrence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections and related adverse outcomes have an important financial impact on the healthcare system, with hospitalization length of stay (2-3 weeks on average) being the largest cost driver, including the cost of device system extraction and device replacement accounting for more than half of total costs. In the recent literature, the economic profile of the TYRX™ absorbable antibacterial envelope was analysed taking into account both randomized and non-randomized trial data. Economic analysis found that the envelope is associated with cost-effectiveness ratios below USA and European benchmarks in selected patients at increased risk of infection. Therefore, the TYRX™ envelope, by effectively reducing CIED infections, provides value according to the criteria of affordability currently adopted by USA and European healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Vitolo
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Biffi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Benedict Brown
- Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Route du Molliau 31, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Khaldoun G Tarakji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - Bruce L Wilkoff
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|