1
|
Chaurasia A, Singh S, Homayounieh F, Gopal N, Jones EC, Linehan WM, Shyn PB, Ball MW, Malayeri AA. Complications after Nephron-sparing Interventions for Renal Tumors: Imaging Findings and Management. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220196. [PMID: 37384546 PMCID: PMC10323228 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
The two primary nephron-sparing interventions for treating renal masses such as renal cell carcinoma are surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) and image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation. Nephron-sparing surgery, such as PN, has been the standard of care for treating many localized renal masses. Although uncommon, complications resulting from PN can range from asymptomatic and mild to symptomatic and life-threatening. These complications include vascular injuries such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and/or renal ischemia; injury to the collecting system causing urinary leak; infection; and tumor recurrence. The incidence of complications after any nephron-sparing surgery depends on many factors, such as the proximity of the tumor to blood vessels or the collecting system, the skill or experience of the surgeon, and patient-specific factors. More recently, image-guided percutaneous renal ablation has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for small renal tumors, with comparable oncologic outcomes to those of PN and a low incidence of major complications. Radiologists must be familiar with the imaging findings encountered after these surgical and image-guided procedures, especially those indicative of complications. The authors review cross-sectional imaging characteristics of complications after PN and image-guided thermal ablation of kidney tumors and highlight the respective management strategies, ranging from clinical observation to interventions such as angioembolization or repeat surgery. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available in the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Chung and Raman in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Chaurasia
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Shiva Singh
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Fatemeh Homayounieh
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Nikhil Gopal
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Elizabeth C. Jones
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - W. Marston Linehan
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Paul B. Shyn
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Mark W. Ball
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Ashkan A. Malayeri
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Purysko AS, Nikolaidis P, Khatri G, Auron M, De Leon AD, Ganeshan D, Gore JL, Gupta RT, Shek-Man Lo S, Lyshchik A, Savage SJ, Smith AD, Taffel MT, Yoo DC, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up and Active Surveillance of Clinically Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S156-S174. [PMID: 35550799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for most malignant renal tumors and is considered the most lethal of all urologic cancers. For follow-up of patients with treated or untreated RCC and those with neoplasms suspected to represent RCC, radiologic imaging is the most valuable component of surveillance, as most relapses and cases of disease progression are identified when patients are asymptomatic. Understanding the strengths and limitations of the various imaging modalities for the detection of disease, recurrence, or progression is essential when planning follow-up regimens. This document addresses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients who have been treated for RCC with radical or partial nephrectomy or ablative therapies. It also discusses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients with localized biopsy-proven or suspected RCC undergoing active surveillance. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul Nikolaidis
- Panel Chair, Vice Chair, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Panel Vice-Chair, Division Chief, Body MRI; Associate Division Chief, Abdominal Imaging; Program Director, Body MRI Fellowship, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Moises Auron
- Medical Director Blood Management; Quality and Patient Safety Officer, Department of Hospital Medicine; Member, Board of Governors, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Primary care physician-Internal medicine
| | | | | | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; American Urological Association
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Chair, ACR Meetings Subcommittee, Commission on Publications and Lifelong Learning
| | - Simon Shek-Man Lo
- Vice Chair for Strategic Planning, Director of SBRT, and Co-chair of Appointment and Promotion Committee of Department of Radiation of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; and Immediate Past President of CARROS of ACR, Fellowship Committee Chair of CARROS of ACR, ACR Assistant Councilor (on behalf of American Radium Society), Chair of the Committee for ACR Practice Parameter for Radiation Oncology
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen J Savage
- Professor and Vice Chairman of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; American Urological Association
| | - Andrew D Smith
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Myles T Taffel
- Associate Section Head Abdominal Imaging, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mark E Lockhart
- Specialty Chair, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and Chair, ACR Appropriateness Committee
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Remer EM. Mimics and Pitfalls in Renal Imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2020; 58:885-896. [PMID: 32792121 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
There are several potential pitfalls that radiologists face when interpreting images of the kidneys. Some result from image acquisition and can arise from the imaging equipment or imaging technique, whereas others are patient related. Another category of pitfalls relates to image interpretation. Some difficulties stem from methods to detect enhancement after contrast administration, whereas others are benign entities that can mimic a renal tumor. Finally, interpretation and diagnosis of fat-containing renal masses may be tricky due to the complexities discerning the pattern of fat within a mass and how that translates to an accurate diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erick M Remer
- Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A21, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma is most commonly diagnosed in the sixth or seventh decade of life. Historically, surgical extirpation was the gold standard treatment option for small renal masses. However, given the comorbidities in this elderly population, not all patients are candidates for surgery. The development of minimally invasive ablative therapies has solved the surgical dilemma in this patient population. Furthermore, the 2017 American Urological Association guidelines recommends consideration of percutaneous image guided thermal ablation as a treatment option for masses smaller than 3 cm even in healthy individuals. Percutaneous image guided thermal ablation is an attractive treatment option providing excellent local tumor control, fewer complications, better preservation of the renal functions, faster recovery and shorter hospital stay. Various ablative modalities are available in clinical practice. This includes radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, high intensity focused ultrasound, and laser ablation. In this review, we focus on the most commonly used modalities including radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation and to a lesser extent microwave ablation and irreversible electroporation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed E Abdelsalam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Kamran Ahrar
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Joe WB, Zarzour JG, Gunn AJ. Renal Cell Carcinoma Ablation: Preprocedural, Intraprocedural, and Postprocedural Imaging. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2019; 1:e190002. [PMID: 33778679 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2019190002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The rising incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in recent decades necessitates careful consideration of additional treatment options, especially for patients who may be poor surgical candidates. An emerging body of evidence suggests that ablation may be performed effectively and safely even in patients with multiple comorbidities. Accordingly, clinical guidelines now include thermal ablation as an alternative for such patients with localized tumors that are 4.0 cm or smaller. Recent experience with these minimally invasive techniques has led to a greater understanding of the imaging findings that merit close attention when ablation is anticipated, or after it is performed. These imaging findings may guide the interventionalist's perception of the risks, technical challenges, and likelihood of treatment success associated with RCC ablation. The present review provides an overview of clinically relevant radiologic findings during the preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural period in the context of image-guided renal ablation. Keywords: Interventional-Body, Kidney, Percutaneous, Urinary © RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winston B Joe
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (W.B.J.); and Divisions of Abdominal Imaging (J.G.Z.) and Vascular and Interventional Radiology (A.J.G.), Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Jessica G Zarzour
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (W.B.J.); and Divisions of Abdominal Imaging (J.G.Z.) and Vascular and Interventional Radiology (A.J.G.), Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Andrew J Gunn
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (W.B.J.); and Divisions of Abdominal Imaging (J.G.Z.) and Vascular and Interventional Radiology (A.J.G.), Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, Birmingham, AL 35249
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Purysko AS, Nikolaidis P, Dogra VS, Ganeshan D, Gore JL, Gupta RT, Heilbrun ME, Khatri G, Kishan AU, Lyshchik A, Savage SJ, Smith AD, Wang ZJ, Wolfman DJ, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Yoo DC, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up and Active Surveillance of Clinically Localized Renal Cell Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16:S399-S416. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
7
|
Lum MA, Shah SB, Durack JC, Nikolovski I. Imaging of Small Renal Masses before and after Thermal Ablation. Radiographics 2019; 39:2134-2145. [PMID: 31560613 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019190083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Thermal ablation of small renal masses is increasingly accepted as an alternative to partial nephrectomy, particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities. Many professional societies support this alternate treatment with updated guidelines. Before performing thermal ablation, it is important to stratify risk and assess technical feasibility by evaluating tumor imaging features such as size, location, and centrality. Routine postablation imaging with CT or MRI is necessary for assessment of residual or recurrent tumor, evidence of complications, or new renal masses outside the ablation zone. The normal spectrum and evolution of findings at CT and MRI include a halo appearance of the ablation zone, ablation zone contraction, and ablation zone calcifications. Tumor recurrence frequently manifests at CT or MRI as new nodular enhancement at the periphery of an expanding ablation zone, although it is normal for the ablation zone to enlarge within the first few months. Recognizing early tumor recurrence is important, as small renal masses are often easily treated with repeat ablations. Potential complications of thermal ablation include vascular injury, urine leak, ureteral stricture, nerve injury, and bowel perforation. The risk of these complications may be related to tumor size and location.©RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Lum
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Shreena B Shah
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Jeremy C Durack
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Ines Nikolovski
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Salagierski M, Wojciechowska A, Zając K, Klatte T, Thompson RH, Cadeddu JA, Kaouk J, Autorino R, Ahrar K, Capitanio U. The Role of Ablation and Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Management of Small Renal Masses. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1:395-402. [PMID: 31158078 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Nephron-sparing approaches are increasingly recommended for incidental small renal masses. Herein, we review the current literature regarding the safety and efficacy of focal therapy, including percutaneous ablation, for small renal masses. OBJECTIVE To summarize the application of ablative therapy in the management of small renal masses. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed and Medline database search was performed to look for findings published since 2000 on focal therapy for small renal masses. After literature review, 64 articles were selected and discussed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy are the most widely used procedures with intermediate-term oncological outcome comparable with surgical series. Cost effectiveness seems excellent and side effects appear acceptable. To date, no randomized trial comparing percutaneous focal therapy with standard surgical approach or active surveillance has been performed. CONCLUSIONS Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy. Percutaneous ablation has fewer complications and a better postoperative profile when compared with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Salagierski
- Urology Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.
| | - Adrianna Wojciechowska
- Urology Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Kinga Zając
- Urology Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth, UK
| | | | | | - Jihad Kaouk
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Kamran Ahrar
- Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Withey SJ, Gariani J, Reddy K, Prezzi D, Kelly-Morland C, Ilyas S, Adam A, Goh V. Is there a role for perfusion imaging in assessing treatment response following ablative therapy of small renal masses-A systematic review. Eur J Radiol Open 2018; 5:102-107. [PMID: 30094296 PMCID: PMC6077124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Ablation therapies are an innovative nephron-sparing alternative to radical nephrectomy for early stage renal cancers, although determination of treatment success is challenging. We aimed to undertake a systematic review of the literature to determine whether assessment of tumour perfusion may improve response assessment or alter clinical management when compared to standard imaging. Material and Methods Two radiologists performed independent primary literature searches for perfusion imaging in response assessment following ablative therapies (radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy) focused on renal tumours. Results 5 of 795 articles were eligible, totaling 110 patients. The study designs were heterogeneous with different imaging techniques, perfusion calculations, reference standard and follow-up periods. All studies found lower perfusion following treatment, with a return of ‘high grade’ perfusion in the 7/110 patients with residual or recurrent tumour. One study found perfusion curves were different between successfully ablated regions and residual tumour. Conclusions Studies were limited by small sample size and heterogeneous methodology. No studies have investigated the impact of perfusion imaging on management. This review highlights the current lack of evidence for perfusion imaging in response assessment following renal ablation, however it suggests that there may be a future role. Further prospective research is required to address this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Withey
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - J Gariani
- Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - K Reddy
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Prezzi
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - C Kelly-Morland
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - S Ilyas
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Adam
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - V Goh
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Renal Cell Carcinoma Perfusion before and after Radiofrequency Ablation Measured with Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2018; 8:diagnostics8010003. [PMID: 29316711 PMCID: PMC5871986 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate if the early treatment effects of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be detected with dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI and to correlate RCC perfusion with RFA treatment time. Materials and methods: 20 patients undergoing RFA of their 21 RCCs were evaluated with DCE-MRI before and at one month after RFA treatment. Perfusion was estimated using the maximum slope technique at two independent sittings. Total RCC blood flow was correlated with total RFA treatment time, tumour location, size and histology. Results: DCE-MRI examinations were successfully evaluated for 21 RCCs (size from 1.3 to 4 cm). Perfusion of the RCCs decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) from a mean of 203 (±80) mL/min/100 mL before RFA to 8.1 (±3.1) mL/min/100 mL after RFA with low intra-observer variability (r ≥ 0.99, p < 0.0001). There was an excellent correlation (r = 0.95) between time to complete ablation and pre-treatment total RCC blood flow. Tumours with an exophytic location exhibit the lowest mean RFA treatment time. Conclusion: DCE-MRI can detect early treatment effects by measuring RCC perfusion before and after RFA. Perfusion significantly decreases in the zone of ablation, suggesting that it may be useful for the assessment of treatment efficacy. Pre-RFA RCC blood flow may be used to predict RFA treatment time.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wah TM. Image-guided ablation of renal cell carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2017; 72:636-644. [PMID: 28527529 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2016] [Revised: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This review article aims to provide an overview of image-guided ablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) since it was first introduced in 1998. This will cover the background and rationale behind its development; an overview of the evidence for current thermal technology, such as heat-based, e.g., radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cold-based energies, e.g., cryoablation used; and summarise the published evidence regarding its treatment efficacy and oncological outcome. In addition, it aims to provide an insight into the potential role of the new non-thermal ablative technology, e.g., irreversible electroporation (IRE)/Nanoknife in image-guided ablation of RCC, as well as areas of challenge that will require further research and clinical evaluation to ensure delivery of a quality patient-centred interventional oncology (IO) service in image-guided ablation of RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Wah
- Institute of Oncology, St. James's University Hospital, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
D'Onofrio M, Barbi E, Girelli R, Tinazzi Martini P, De Robertis R, Ciaravino V, Salvia R, Butturini G, Frigerio I, Milazzo T, Crosara S, Paiella S, Pederzoli P, Bassi C. Variation of tumoral marker after radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:213-20. [PMID: 27034788 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the correlation between variations of CA 19.9 blood levels and the entity of necrosis at CT after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS In this study, from June 2010 to February 2014, patients with diagnosis of unresectable and not metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, expressing tumor marker CA 19.9, treated with RFA procedure were included. All these patients underwent RFA. CT study was performed 1 week after RFA. The dosage of CA 19.9 levels was performed 1 month after RFA. Features of necrosis at CT, as mean entity, density and necrosis percentages compared to the original lesion, were evaluated and compared by using t-test with CA 19.9 blood levels variations after RFA procedure. RESULTS In this study were included 51 patients with diagnosis of unresectable and not metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, expressing tumor marker CA 19.9, treated with RFA procedure and with CT study and CA 19.9 available for analysis. After the procedure, CA 19.9 blood levels reduced in 24/51 (47%), remained stable in 10/51 (20%) and increased in 17/51 (33%). In patients with CA 19.9 levels reduced, the tumor marker were reduced less than 20% in 4/24 (17%) and more than 20% in 20/24 (83%); instead the tumor marker were reduced less than 30% in 8/24 (33%) and more than 30% in 16/24 (67%). At CT scan necrotic area density difference was not statistically significant. Also there was no statistically significant difference among the mean area, the mean volume and the mean ablation volume in percentage related to the treated tumor among the three different groups of patients divided depending on the CA 19.9 blood levels. But a tendency to a statistically significant difference was found in comparing the mean percentage of ablation volume between two subgroups of patients with a decrease of CA 19.9 levels with less or more than 20% reduction of tumor markers and between two subgroups with less or more than 30% reduction of CA 19.9 levels. CONCLUSIONS RFA of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma induces reduction of CA 19.9 blood levels in about half of the cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko D'Onofrio
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Emilio Barbi
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Girelli
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Tinazzi Martini
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Robertis
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Ciaravino
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Isabella Frigerio
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Teresa Milazzo
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Crosara
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Pederzoli
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- 1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Levesque VM, Shyn PB, Tuncali K, Tatli S, Nawfel RD, Olubiyi O, Silverman SG. Radiation dose during CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: Effect of a dose reduction protocol. Eur J Radiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
14
|
Thermal Ablative Techniques in Renal Cell Carcinoma. KIDNEY CANCER 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17903-2_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
15
|
Iannuccilli JD, Grand DJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Percutaneous ablation for small renal masses-imaging follow-up. Semin Intervent Radiol 2014; 31:50-63. [PMID: 24596440 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and effective nephron-sparing alternative to surgical resection for the treatment of small renal tumors. Assessment of treatment efficacy relies heavily on interval follow-up imaging after treatment. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) both play a pivotal role in evaluating the treatment zone, identifying residual tumor, and detecting early and delayed procedure-related complications. This article discusses a surveillance imaging protocol for patients who undergo percutaneous thermal ablation of renal tumors, and also illustrates the typical appearances of both successfully treated tumors and residual disease on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. In addition, it discusses the imaging appearance of potential early and delayed treatment-related complications to facilitate their prompt detection and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Iannuccilli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David J Grand
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Damian E Dupuy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - William W Mayo-Smith
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cornelis F, Balageas P, Le Bras Y, Rigou G, Boutault JR, Bouzgarrou M, Grenier N. Radiologically-guided thermal ablation of renal tumours. Diagn Interv Imaging 2012; 93:246-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2012.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
17
|
Energy Ablative Techniques in Renal Cell Carcinoma. KIDNEY CANCER 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21858-3_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
18
|
Current world literature. Curr Opin Urol 2011; 21:166-72. [PMID: 21285721 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e328344100a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
Medical imaging in interventional oncology is used differently than in diagnostic radiology and prioritizes different imaging features. Whereas diagnostic imaging prioritizes the highest-quality imaging, interventional imaging prioritizes real-time imaging with lower radiation dose in addition to high-quality imaging. In general, medical imaging plays five key roles in image-guided therapy, and interventional oncology, in particular. These roles are (a) preprocedure planning, (b) intraprocedural targeting, (c) intraprocedural monitoring, (d) intraprocedural control, and (e) postprocedure assessment. Although many of these roles are still relatively basic in interventional oncology, as research and development in medical imaging focuses on interventional needs, it is likely that the role of medical imaging in intervention will become even more integral and more widely applied. In this review, the current status of medical imaging for intervention in oncology will be described and directions for future development will be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Georgiades CS, Rodriguez R, Littrup PJ, Frangakis CE, Leveille R, Ahrar K, Atwell TD, Cadeddu J, Trimmer C, Durack JC, Hammers HJ, Meng MV, Raman S, Solomon SB, Zagoria RJ, McLennan G, LaBerge JM, Gervais DA, Kee ST. Development of a Research Agenda for Percutaneous Renal Tumor Ablation: Proceedings from a Multidisciplinary Research Consensus Panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:1807-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2010] [Revised: 09/28/2010] [Accepted: 10/07/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|