1
|
Huesa-Berral C, Terry JF, Kunz L, Bertolet A. Sequencing microsphere selective internal radiotherapy after external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: proof of concept of a synergistic combination. Br J Radiol 2025; 98:50-57. [PMID: 39418205 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to explore the synergistic effects of combining stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in that specific sequence for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in patients at high risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). METHODS We analysed a case of a patient with HCC who was treated with SBRT at our institution. A virtual 90Y dose distribution was added using our in-house MIDOS model to keep a minimum dose to the healthy liver tissue. BED and EUD metrics were calculated to harmonize the dose distributions of SBRT and SIRT. RESULTS Our radiation biology-based models suggest that the combination of SBRT and SIRT could maintain effective tumour control while reducing the dose to normal liver tissue. Specifically, an SBRT plan of 10 Gy×3 fractions combined with SIRT yielded comparable tumour control probability to an SBRT-only plan of 10 Gy×5 fractions. CONCLUSIONS The combination of SBRT and SIRT is a promising treatment strategy for HCC patients at high risk of RILD. While the LQ model and associated formalisms provide a useful starting point, further studies are needed to account for factors beyond these models. Nonetheless, the potential for significant dose reduction to normal tissue suggests that this combination therapy could offer substantial clinical benefits. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This article presents a proposal to combine SBRT and SIRT, in this specific order, for HCC, discussing its advantages. A framework for future research into optimizing combination therapy for HCC is provided, utilizing a novel HCC vascular model to simulate 90Y doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Huesa-Berral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Jack F Terry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Louis Kunz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Alejandro Bertolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Öcal E, Alunni-Fabbroni M, Piseddu I, Thaler M, Zacherl MJ, Salvermoser L, Stechele MMR, Burnell LF, Hirner-Eppeneder H, Kimm MA, Rudelius M, Seidensticker M, Wildgruber M, Goldberg SN, Ricke J. Immune Modulation in Untreated, Contralateral Hepatic Metastases after Yttrium-90 Radioembolization of Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:1793-1805.e4. [PMID: 39047935 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess immunogenic effects in unembolized contralateral tumor after single lobar yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (90Y-TARE) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). MATERIAL AND METHODS The analysis comprised 10 patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) CRLM scheduled for staged treatment in the prospective AROMA trial. Eligibility criteria included bilobar metastatic disease with >5 lesions without any treatment within 3 weeks. Baseline biopsy was followed by initial 90Y-TARE treatment of 1 liver lobe, followed by a second biopsy of yet untreated tumors in the other liver lobe at a median of 13 days (range, 4-49 days) immediately before second treatment. Tumor biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected before treatments for immune cell analysis. Patients were stratified into responders and nonresponders based on tumor control or progression during follow-up. RESULTS At baseline, responders (n = 4) displayed lower concentrations of FoxP3+ cells and colocation of CD4+FoxP3+ cells than nonresponders (both P = .02) in tumor tissues. At second biopsy, nonresponders showed a higher CD68+ macrophage density (P = .0014) than responders. Responders displayed fewer CD4+FoxP3+ T cells than CD8+ T cells at all time points (P = .02 and P = .0428). Nonresponders demonstrated a trending increase in CD68+ macrophages (P = .062), as well as a higher CD8+PD1+/CD8+ ratio (P = .062). PBMCs of nonresponders displayed lower CD8+PD1+ T cells and CD8+PD1+/CD8+ ratio at both time points. CONCLUSIONS 90Y-TARE induces local immunogenic effects in nonexposed MSS CRLM, as well as systemic exhaustion of immune cells in nonresponders. Clinical implications such as a prognostic role or synergism of 90Y-TARE and checkpoint inhibition in MSS CRLM warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Öcal
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ignazio Piseddu
- Center of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPS-M) and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Thaler
- Center of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPS-M) and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Salvermoser
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lu Fornés Burnell
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Melanie A Kimm
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Martina Rudelius
- Department of Pathology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - S Nahum Goldberg
- Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene Therapy and Division of Image-guided Therapy and Interventional Oncology (S.N.G.), Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schindler A, Fischer J, Beeskow AB, Lincke T, Ebel S, Seehofer D, Denecke T, Veelken R, Sabri O, Öcal O, Seidensticker M, Berg T, van Bömmel F. Impact of IL-8 on survival after TARE in HCC: a comprehensive investigation and external validation from the SORAMIC trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:486. [PMID: 39503874 PMCID: PMC11541297 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05947-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial radioembolization (TARE), identifying reliable biomarkers for predicting survival outcomes remains a critical challenge. We aimed to address this gap by investigating the significance of serum cytokines associated with inflammation as potential biomarkers for the selection of patients for TARE. METHODS Our retrospective study involved 161 patients diagnosed with HCC who underwent Y90 radioembolization at our medical center between 2010 and 2020. Serum samples from a subset of 78 patients were retrospectively analyzed to determine the concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The results from the prospective SORAMIC trial were used for independent validation. RESULTS With a median overall survival of 36 weeks (range 4-436), our study showed the strongest correlation between 12-week survival and IL-8 levels before treatment (p < 0.001), while other relevant interleukins, interferon-α2, INF-γ, TNF-α and MCP-1 were not associated with survival. IL-8 levels below the cut-off of 190 pg/mL were significantly associated with increased 12-week and 24-week survival, with hazard ratios of 19.01 (95% CI: 2.29-157.89) and 2.57 (95% CI: 1.05-6.31), respectively (p = 0.006 and p = 0.039, respectively). In the adjusted multivariate analysis, the 190 pg/mL cut-off for IL-8 remained independently associated with 12- (p = 0.011) and 24-week survival (p = 0.039). Similarly, the SORAMIC population showed a strong association between IL-8 levels and 36-week survival (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Our study emphasizes the pivotal role of IL-8 as a valuable parameter, demonstrating its potential for predicting treatment outcomes and assessing liver function in patients with HCC undergoing TARE. The robustness of these findings warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Schindler
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Janett Fischer
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anne-Bettina Beeskow
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Lincke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ebel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Rhea Veelken
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Berg
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Florian van Bömmel
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Behzadi AH, Haghani L, D'Souza DL, Flanagan S, Jones C. Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:48-55. [PMID: 38495267 PMCID: PMC10940042 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are common liver-directed therapies (LDTs) for unresectable HCC. While both deliver intra-arterial treatment directly to the site of the tumor, they differ in mechanisms of action and side effects. Several studies have compared their side effect profile, time to progression, and overall survival data, but often these lack practical considerations when choosing which treatment modality to use. Many factors can impact operator's choice for treatment, and the choice depends on treatment availability, cost, insurance coverage, operator's comfort level, patient-specific factors, tumor location, tumor biology, and disease stage. This review discusses survival data, time to progression data, as well as more practical patient and tumor characteristics for personalized LDT with TACE or TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Leila Haghani
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York City, New York
| | - Donna L. D'Souza
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Siobhan Flanagan
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Christopher Jones
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dürig J, Calcagni M, Buschmann J. Transition metals in angiogenesis - A narrative review. Mater Today Bio 2023; 22:100757. [PMID: 37593220 PMCID: PMC10430620 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to offer a narrative review of the literature regarding the influence of transition metals on angiogenesis, excluding lanthanides and actinides. To our knowledge there are not any reviews up to date offering such a summary, which inclined us to write this paper. Angiogenesis describes the process of blood vessel formation, which is an essential requirement for human growth and development. When the complex interplay between pro- and antiangiogenic mediators falls out of balance, angiogenesis can quickly become harmful. As it is so fundamental, both its inhibition and enhancement take part in various diseases, making it a target for therapeutic treatments. Current methods come with limitations, therefore, novel agents are constantly being researched, with metal agents offering promising results. Various transition metals have already been investigated in-depth, with studies indicating both pro- and antiangiogenic properties, respectively. The transition metals are being applied in various formulations, such as nanoparticles, complexes, or scaffold materials. Albeit the increasing attention this field is receiving, there remain many unanswered questions, mostly regarding the molecular mechanisms behind the observed effects. Notably, approximately half of all the transition metals have not yet been investigated regarding potential angiogenic effects. Considering the promising results which have already been established, it should be of great interest to begin investigating the remaining elements whilst also further analyzing the established effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Dürig
- University of Zürich, Faculty of Medicine, Pestalozzistrasse 3, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
- University Hospital of Zürich, Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Maurizio Calcagni
- University Hospital of Zürich, Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Johanna Buschmann
- University Hospital of Zürich, Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ballı HT, Aikimbaev K, Burak İG, Pişkin FC. Short-term changes of angiogenesis factors after transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Diagn Interv Radiol 2023; 29:704-709. [PMID: 36994546 PMCID: PMC10679548 DOI: 10.4274/dir.2021.211255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze changes in angiogenesis factors after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium- 90-loaded resin microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS Interleukin-6, interleukin-8, hepatocyte growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), and angiopoietin-2 levels in 26 patients were measured before TARE and on day 1, 7, 14, and 30 after TARE and evaluated regarding radiological response. RESULTS In the sixth month of follow-up, 11 (42.30%) patients had a complete or partial response to treatment, while progressive disease was found in 15 (57.69%) patients. The percentage changes in VEGF-A in the non-responders on day 30 (P = 0.034) after TARE were significantly more obvious. Peak formation rates of VEGF-A were higher in non-responders (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION Short-term changes in angiogenesis factors in HCC patients after TARE with Yttrium-90-loaded resin microspheres fluctuate with different amplitudes at different times. The upregulation of growth factors has a prognostic capacity. Changes in VEGF-A after TARE may be helpful for the early recognition of non-responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hüseyin Tuğsan Ballı
- Department of Radiology, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - Kairgeldy Aikimbaev
- Department of Radiology, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - İsa Güney Burak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ferhat Can Pişkin
- Department of Radiology, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Montero E, Isenberg JS. The TSP1-CD47-SIRPα interactome: an immune triangle for the checkpoint era. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023; 72:2879-2888. [PMID: 37217603 PMCID: PMC10412679 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03465-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The use of treatments, such as programmed death protein 1 (PD1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies, that loosen the natural checks upon immune cell activity to enhance cancer killing have shifted clinical practice and outcomes for the better. Accordingly, the number of antibodies and engineered proteins that interact with the ligand-receptor components of immune checkpoints continue to increase along with their use. It is tempting to view these molecular pathways simply from an immune inhibitory perspective. But this should be resisted. Checkpoint molecules can have other cardinal functions relevant to the development and use of blocking moieties. Cell receptor CD47 is an example of this. CD47 is found on the surface of all human cells. Within the checkpoint paradigm, non-immune cell CD47 signals through immune cell surface signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) to limit the activity of the latter, the so-called trans signal. Even so, CD47 interacts with other cell surface and soluble molecules to regulate biogas and redox signaling, mitochondria and metabolism, self-renewal factors and multipotency, and blood flow. Further, the pedigree of checkpoint CD47 is more intricate than supposed. High-affinity interaction with soluble thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) and low-affinity interaction with same-cell SIRPα, the so-called cis signal, and non-SIRPα ectodomains on the cell membrane suggests that multiple immune checkpoints converge at and through CD47. Appreciation of this may provide latitude for pathway-specific targeting and intelligent therapeutic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Montero
- Department of Diabetes Immunology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
- Arthur Riggs Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Isenberg
- Department of Diabetes Complications and Metabolism, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
- Arthur Riggs Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coskun N, Yildirim A, Yuksel AO, Canyigit M, Ozdemir E. The Radiation Dose Absorbed by Healthy Parenchyma Is a Predictor for the Rate of Contralateral Hypertrophy After Unilobar Radioembolization of the Right Liver. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 56:291-298. [PMID: 36425272 PMCID: PMC9679057 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the predictors of contralateral hypertrophy in patients treated with unilobar transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90-loaded resin microspheres due to unresectable right-liver tumors. Methods Patients who underwent right unilobar TARE with resin microspheres between May 2019 and September 2021 were screened retrospectively. Contralateral hypertrophy was evaluated by calculating the kinetic growth rate (KGR) in 8-10 weeks after TARE. The predictors of increased KGR were determined with linear regression analysis. Results A total of 24 patients (16 with primary and 8 with metastatic liver tumors) were included in the study. After right unilobar TARE, mean volume of the left lobe increased from 368.26 to 436.16 mL, while the mean volume of the right lobe decreased from 1576.22 to 1477.89 mL. The median KGR of the left lobe was 0.28% per week. The radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly higher in patients with increased KGR (31.62 vs. 18.78 Gy, p = 0.037). Linear regression analysis showed that the dose absorbed by healthy parenchyma was significantly associated with increased KGR (b = 0.014, p = 0.043). Conclusion Patients who received right unilobar TARE for liver malignancies could develop a substantial contralateral hypertrophy, and the radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly associated with increased KGR in the left lobe. TARE could have a role for inducing contralateral hypertrophy as it offers the advantage of concurrent local tumor control along with its hypertrophic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazim Coskun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aslihan Yildirim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Murat Canyigit
- Department of Radiology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Ozdemir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Farshidpour M, Pace S, Volk ML. The clinical value of angiopoietin-2 in liver diseases. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2022; 19:244-247. [PMID: 36619892 PMCID: PMC9815690 DOI: 10.1002/cld.1218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Content available: Audio Recording.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham Farshidpour
- Division of Gastroenterology and Transplant InstituteLoma Linda University HealthLoma LindaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Spencer Pace
- Department of Internal Medicine LomaLinda University HealthLoma LindaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Michael L. Volk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Transplant InstituteLoma Linda University HealthLoma LindaCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ytrrium-90 transarterial radioembolization in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:796-808. [PMID: 35013882 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02745-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) is a promising alternative strategy to treat liver tumors and liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC), as it selectively delivers radioactive isotopes to the tumor via the hepatic artery, sparring surrounding liver tissue. The landscape of TARE indications is constantly evolving. This strategy is considered for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with liver-confined disease and preserved liver function in whom neither TACE nor systemic therapy is possible. In patients with liver metastases from CRC, TARE is advised when other chemotherapeutic options have failed. Recent phase III trials have not succeeded to prove benefit in overall survival; however, it has helped to better understand the patients that may benefit from TARE based on subgroup analysis. New strategies and treatment combinations are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical applications of TARE in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Öcal O, Schütte K, Kupčinskas J, Morkunas E, Jurkeviciute G, de Toni EN, Ben Khaled N, Berg T, Malfertheiner P, Klümpen HJ, Sengel C, Basu B, Valle JW, Benckert J, Gasbarrini A, Palmer D, Seidensticker R, Wildgruber M, Sangro B, Pech M, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Baseline Interleukin-6 and -8 predict response and survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib monotherapy: an exploratory post hoc analysis of the SORAMIC trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148:475-485. [PMID: 33855585 PMCID: PMC8800931 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03627-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the potential correlation between baseline interleukin (IL) values and overall survival or objective response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib. METHODS A subset of patients with HCC undergoing sorafenib monotherapy within a prospective multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC, sorafenib treatment alone vs. combined with Y90 radioembolization) underwent baseline IL-6 and IL-8 assessment before treatment initiation. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, the best cut-off points for baseline IL-6 and IL-8 values predicting overall survival (OS) were evaluated, as well as correlation with the objective response. RESULTS Forty-seven patients (43 male) with a median OS of 13.8 months were analyzed. Cut-off values of 8.58 and 57.9 pg/mL most effectively predicted overall survival for IL-6 and IL-8, respectively. Patients with high IL-6 (HR, 4.1 [1.9-8.9], p < 0.001) and IL-8 (HR, 2.4 [1.2-4.7], p = 0.009) had significantly shorter overall survival than patients with low IL values. Multivariate analysis confirmed IL-6 (HR, 2.99 [1.22-7.3], p = 0.017) and IL-8 (HR, 2.19 [1.02-4.7], p = 0.044) as independent predictors of OS. Baseline IL-6 and IL-8 with respective cut-off values predicted objective response rates according to mRECIST in a subset of 42 patients with follow-up imaging available (IL-6, 46.6% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.007; IL-8, 50.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION IL-6 and IL-8 baseline values predicted outcomes of sorafenib-treated patients in this well-characterized prospective cohort of the SORAMIC trial. We suggest that the respective cut-off values might serve for validation in larger cohorts, potentially offering guidance for improved patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Juozas Kupčinskas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Egidijus Morkunas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Gabija Jurkeviciute
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Enrico N de Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Berg
- Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Gastroenterologie, Sektion Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Heinz Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Sengel
- Radiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France
| | - Bristi Basu
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences and Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Julia Benckert
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Daniel Palmer
- Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University Hospitals and Clatterbridge, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
HCC: role of pre- and post-treatment tumor biology in driving adverse outcomes and rare responses to therapy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3686-3697. [PMID: 34195886 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03192-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Liver cancer is the fastest-growing cause of cancer deaths in the United States and is a complex disease. The response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to treatment can be variable. Predicting response to determine the most effective therapy is an active area of research. Our understanding of underlying factors which drive response to therapy is continually increasing. As more therapies for the treatment of this disease evolve, it is crucial to identify and match the ideal therapy for a particular tumor and patient. The potential predicative imaging features of tumor behavior, while of research interest, have not been validated for clinical use and do not currently inform treatment planning. If further validated though, prognostic features may be used in the future to personalize treatment plans according to individual patients and tumors. Unexpected post-treatment responses such as potential tumor biology changes and abscopal effect which are important to be aware of. This review is intended for radiologists who routinely interpret post treatment HCC imaging and is designed to increase their cognizance about how HCC tumor biology drives response to therapy and explore rare responses to therapy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Öcal O, Kupčinskas J, Morkunas E, Amthauer H, Schütte K, Malfertheiner P, Klümpen HJ, Sengel C, Benckert J, Seidensticker R, Sangro B, Wildgruber M, Pech M, Bartenstein P, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Prognostic value of baseline interleukin 6 levels in liver decompensation and survival in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:51. [PMID: 34080071 PMCID: PMC8172845 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00791-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To confirm the prognostic value of previously published baseline interleukin 6 (IL6) and IL8 cutoff values in survival and liver dysfunction in patients with advanced HCC undergoing 90Y radioembolization. Methods A total of 83 patients (77 male) represented a subset of HCC patients undergoing 90Y radioembolization combined with sorafenib as part of the prospective multicenter phase II trial SORAMIC. IL6 and IL8 levels were determined in serum samples collected at baseline. In this post hoc analysis, we sought to confirm the prognostic value of baseline cutoff values of 6.53 pg/mL and 60.8 pg/mL for IL6 and IL8, respectively, in overall survival (OS) or liver dysfunction (grade 2 bilirubin increase) after treatment. Results Median OS was 12.0 months. While low baseline albumin and high bilirubin values were associated with high IL6, liver cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, and portal vein infiltration were associated with high IL8. In univariate analysis, high baseline IL6 and IL8 were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (7.8 vs. 19.0 months for IL6 and 8.4 vs. 16.0 months for IL8). In addition to IL values, liver cirrhosis, Child–Pugh grade, baseline albumin (< 36 g/dL), and total bilirubin (≥ 17 µmol/L), and higher mALBI grade (2b &3) values were associated with OS. At multivariate analysis, high baseline IL6 was the only independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.35 [1.35–4.1], p = 0.002). Risk factors for liver dysfunction were high baseline IL6, albumin, and total bilirubin, and mALBI grade as found in univariate analysis. High baseline IL6 (HR 2.67 [1.21–5.94], p = 0.016) and total bilirubin ≥ 17 µmol/L (HR 3.73 [1.72–8.06], p < 0.001) were independently associated with liver dysfunction. Conclusion In advanced HCC patients receiving 90Y radioembolization combined with sorafenib, baseline IL6 values proved to be prognostic, confirming previous findings in patients undergoing 90Yradioembolization. IL6 might be useful for patient selection or stratification in future trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00791-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Juozas Kupčinskas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Egidijus Morkunas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heinz Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Sengel
- Radiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France
| | - Julia Benckert
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ao J, Chiba T, Kanzaki H, Kanayama K, Shibata S, Kurosugi A, Iwanaga T, Kan M, Sakuma T, Qiang N, Ma Y, Kojima R, Kusakabe Y, Nakamura M, Kobayashi K, Kiyono S, Kanogawa N, Saito T, Nakagawa R, Kondo T, Ogasawara S, Suzuki E, Nakamoto S, Muroyama R, Tawada A, Kato J, Kanda T, Maruyama H, Kato N. Serum Angiopoietin 2 acts as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer 2021; 12:2694-2701. [PMID: 33854629 PMCID: PMC8040723 DOI: 10.7150/jca.56436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is typically accompanied by abundant arterial blood flow. Although angiogenic growth factors such as Angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) play a central role in tumor angiogenesis in HCC, the role of serum Ang2 as a biomarker in HCC remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of Ang2 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in HCC using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The median Ang2 levels in controls (n=20), chronic liver disease patients (n=98), and HCC patients (n=275) were 1.58, 2.33, and 3.53 ng/mL, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of Ang2 was determined as 3.5 ng/mL by receiver operating curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Ang2 for HCC detection were 50.9, 83.7, and 59.5%, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated only a weak correlation between Ang2 serum levels and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) serum levels. The diagnostic value of Ang2 was comparable to those of other existing markers. In addition, 24 out of 73 patients with normal AFP and DCP levels (32.9%) demonstrated abnormally high Ang2 levels (≥3.5 ng/mL). Although no significant difference in overall survival was found between Ang2high and Ang2low patients with curative ablation therapy, recurrence-free survival (RFS) in Ang2high patients was observed to be significantly shorter than those in Ang2low patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high serum Ang2 levels (≥3.5 ng/mL) and the presence of multiple tumors were poor prognostic factors. In conclusion, our findings indicate that serum Ang2 is a potential novel biomarker for both diagnosis and prognosis in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junjie Ao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Tetsuhiro Chiba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kanzaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Kengo Kanayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Shuhei Shibata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Akane Kurosugi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Terunao Iwanaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Motoyasu Kan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sakuma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Na Qiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Yaojia Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Ryuta Kojima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Yuko Kusakabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Masato Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Kazufumi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Soichiro Kiyono
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Naoya Kanogawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Tomoko Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Ryo Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Takayuki Kondo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Sadahisa Ogasawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Eiichiro Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Shingo Nakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Muroyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Akinobu Tawada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Jun Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Kanda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi-Kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Maruyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Naoya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Uhlig J, Lukovic J, Dawson LA, Patel RA, Cavnar MJ, Kim HS. Locoregional Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Options Beyond Resection. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:133-146. [PMID: 34010047 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer was the third most common malignancy worldwide in 2018, and most patients present with or develop distant metastases. Colorectal liver metastases are most commonly observed because of the vascular drainage of the colon and superior rectum. Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as first-line treatment; however, 80% to 90% of patients with colorectal liver metastases are ineligible for primary resection. For patients with unresectable disease, a multidisciplinary treatment approach is favored, incorporating systemic therapy and a toolbox of local ablative therapies. These treatments either aim at cytoreduction to enable a conversion to surgical resectability or control of disease progression and spread. Each of these treatments carries unique outcomes and risk profiles, thereby contributing to an individualized treatment strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases. This review summarizes evidence on hepatic artery infusion, stereotactic body radiation therapy, thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluding beads, and transarterial radioembolization for treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Results of large-scale prospective and retrospective studies and international guidelines are discussed to provide detailed background on the current and prospective use of local ablative techniques in management of colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Uhlig
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Jelena Lukovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reema A Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Michael J Cavnar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vanderborght B, Lefere S, Vlierberghe HV, Devisscher L. The Angiopoietin/Tie2 Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cells 2020; 9:cells9112382. [PMID: 33143149 PMCID: PMC7693961 DOI: 10.3390/cells9112382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to the usually late diagnosis and lack of effective therapies, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which poses a growing global health problem, is characterized by a poor prognosis. Angiogenesis plays an important role in HCC progression, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietins (Angs) are key drivers of HCC angiogenesis. VEGF-targeting strategies already represent an important component of today’s systemic treatment landscape of HCC, whereas targeting the Ang/Tie2 signaling pathway may harbor future potential in this context due to reported beneficial anticancer effects when targeting this pathway. In addition, a better understanding of the relation between Angs and HCC angiogenesis and progression may reveal their potential as predictive factors for post-treatment disease progression and prognosis. In this review, we give a comprehensive overview of the complex role of Ang/Tie2 signaling in HCC, pinpointing its potential value as biomarker and target for HCC treatments, aiding HCC diagnosis and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Vanderborght
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hepatology Research Unit, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; (B.V.); (S.L.); (H.V.V.)
- Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Gut-Liver Immunopharmacology Unit, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sander Lefere
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hepatology Research Unit, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; (B.V.); (S.L.); (H.V.V.)
- Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Gut-Liver Immunopharmacology Unit, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Vlierberghe
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hepatology Research Unit, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; (B.V.); (S.L.); (H.V.V.)
| | - Lindsey Devisscher
- Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Gut-Liver Immunopharmacology Unit, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-9-332-56-65
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Erinjeri JP, Fine GC, Adema GJ, Ahmed M, Chapiro J, den Brok M, Duran R, Hunt SJ, Johnson DT, Ricke J, Sze DY, Toskich BB, Wood BJ, Woodrum D, Goldberg SN. Immunotherapy and the Interventional Oncologist: Challenges and Opportunities-A Society of Interventional Oncology White Paper. Radiology 2019; 292:25-34. [PMID: 31012818 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Interventional oncology is a subspecialty field of interventional radiology that addresses the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and cancer-related problems by using targeted minimally invasive procedures performed with image guidance. Immuno-oncology is an innovative area of cancer research and practice that seeks to help the patient's own immune system fight cancer. Both interventional oncology and immuno-oncology can potentially play a pivotal role in cancer management plans when used alongside medical, surgical, and radiation oncology in the care of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P Erinjeri
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Gabriel C Fine
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Gosse J Adema
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Muneeb Ahmed
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Julius Chapiro
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Martijn den Brok
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Rafael Duran
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Stephen J Hunt
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - D Thor Johnson
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Beau Bosko Toskich
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Bradford J Wood
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - David Woodrum
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - S Nahum Goldberg
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Alsultan AA, Barentsz MW, Smits MLJ, Koopman M, Lam MGEH, Rosenbaum CENM. Angiogenesis in 90Y-Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Semin Nucl Med 2019; 49:204-210. [PMID: 30954186 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
In order to evaluate the role of angiogenesis in 90Y-radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastasis an overview was provided of angiogenic growth factors and their function, the angiogenic mechanisms in colorectal cancer, the role of hypoxia, and the advances in antiangiogenic therapy. Last, the use of circulating angiogenic growth factors in 90Y-radioembolization was reviewed. Two literature searches were conducted. A search query in PubMed on angiogenesis in colorectal cancer, and a systematic search in PubMed (Medline), Embase, and the Cochrane Library (October 2018) with synonyms for "radioembolization" and "angiogenic growth factor." The first search yielded 3 relevant publications on the role of angiogenic growth factors in colorectal cancer, hypoxia, and antiangiogenic therapy. The second search yielded two prospective studies on circulating angiogenic factors and their relationship with response and survival after 90Y-radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Rises in circulating angiogenic growth factors after radioembolization were seen in both studies. High baseline values of Ang-2 and IL-8 correlated with shorter survival and post 90Y-radiembolization rises in Ang-2 and HGF correlated with early progression. Various angiogenic growth factors play a role in the development and progression of colorectal cancer. Several factors show correlation with poor outcomes after 90Y-radioembolization and might be used for patient selection in the future, however, validation in larger comparative studies is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed A Alsultan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Maarten W Barentsz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten L J Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E N M Rosenbaum
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Petrillo M, Patella F, Pesapane F, Suter MB, Ierardi AM, Angileri SA, Floridi C, de Filippo M, Carrafiello G. Hypoxia and tumor angiogenesis in the era of hepatocellular carcinoma transarterial loco-regional treatments. Future Oncol 2018; 14:2957-2967. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This review focuses upon interactions and potential therapeutic targets in the ‘vicious cycle’ between hypoxia and neoangiogenesis following treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transarterial loco-regional therapies. Biomarkers correlated with angiogenesis have been studied by many authors as prognostic determinants following transarterial intrahepatic therapy. According to these results future therapies directed toward specific factors related to angiogenesis could play a significant role in preventing local tumor recurrence and remote metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Petrillo
- Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology Service, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Patella
- Postgraduation School of Radiodiagnostic of Milan, Department of Health Sciences, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Postgraduation School of Radiodiagnostic of Milan, Department of Health Sciences, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo B Suter
- Department of Medical Oncology, ASST Sette laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - Anna M Ierardi
- Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology Service, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Floridi
- Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo de Filippo
- Department of Medicine & Surgery Via Gramsci Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma, 14 Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Impact of Interventional Oncology Therapies on Tumor Microenvironment and Strategies to Enhance Their Efficacy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210:648-656. [PMID: 29364726 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.17677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We provide a brief review of the tumor microenvironment, the impact of six interventional radiology treatments on the tumor microenvironment, and potential methods to improve treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION Interventional oncology plays a unique role in cancer therapy, contributing to both antitumorigenic and protumorigenic effects.
Collapse
|
21
|
Dosimetric parameters predicting contralateral liver hypertrophy after unilobar radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 45:392-401. [PMID: 29177870 PMCID: PMC5787216 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3845-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed at identifying prior therapy dosimetric parameters using 99mTc-labeled macro-aggregates of albumin (MAA) that are associated with contralateral hepatic hypertrophy occurring after unilobar radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) performed with 90Y–loaded glass microspheres. Methods The dosimetry data of 73 HCC patients were collected prior to the treatment with 90Y–loaded microspheres for unilateral disease. The injected liver dose (ILD), the tumor dose (TD) and healthy injected liver dose (HILD) were calculated based on MAA quantification. Following treatment, the maximal hypertrophy (MHT) of an untreated lobe was calculated. Results Mean MHT was 35.4 ± 40.4%. When using continuous variables, the MHT was not correlated with any tested variable, i.e., injected activity, ILD, HILD or TD except with a percentage of future remnant liver (FRL) following the 90Y–microspheres injection (r = −0.56). MHT ≥ 10% was significantly more frequent for patients with HILD ≥ 88 Gy, (52% of the cases), i.e., in 92.2% versus 65.7% for HILD < 88 Gy (p = 0.032). MHT ≥ 10% was also significantly more frequent for patients with a TD ≥ 205 Gy and a tumor volume (VT) ≥ 100 cm3 in patients with initial FRL < 50%. MHT ≥10% was seen in 83.9% for patients with either an HILD ≥ 88 Gy or a TD ≥ 205 Gy for tumors larger than 100cm3 (85% of the cases), versus only 54.5% (p = 0.0265) for patients with none of those parameters. MHT ≥10% was also associated with FRL and the Child-Pugh score. Using multivariate analysis, the Child-Pugh score (p < 0.0001), FRL (p = 0.0023) and HILD (p = 0.0029) were still significantly associated with MHT ≥10%. Conclusion This study demonstrates for the first time that HILD is significantly associated with liver hypertrophy. There is also an impact of high tumor doses in large lesions in one subgroup of patients. Larger prospective studies evaluating the MAA dosimetric parameters have to be conducted to confirm these promising results.
Collapse
|
22
|
Mouli SK, Goff LW. Local Arterial Therapies in the Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2017; 18:67. [DOI: 10.1007/s11864-017-0509-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
23
|
Ronald J, Nixon AB, Marin D, Gupta RT, Janas G, Chen W, Suhocki PV, Pabon-Ramos W, Sopko DR, Starr MD, Brady JC, Hurwitz HI, Kim CY. Pilot Evaluation of Angiogenesis Signaling Factor Response after Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology 2017; 285:311-318. [PMID: 28787261 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To identify changes in a broad panel of circulating angiogenesis factors after bland transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), a purely ischemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods This prospective HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants prior to entry into the study. Twenty-five patients (21 men; mean age, 61 years; range, 30-81 years) with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 or biopsy-proven HCC and who were undergoing TAE were enrolled from October 15, 2014, through December 2, 2015. Nineteen plasma angiogenesis factors (angiopoietin 2; hepatocyte growth factor; platelet-derived growth factor AA and BB; placental growth factor; vascular endothelial growth factor A and D; vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, 2, and 3; osteopontin; transforming growth factor β1 and β2; thrombospondin 2; intercellular adhesion molecule 1; interleukin 6 [IL-6]; stromal cell-derived factor 1; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1; and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 [VCAM-1]) were measured by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 5 weeks after TAE and were compared with baseline levels by using paired Wilcoxon tests. Tumor response was assessed according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Angiogenesis factor levels were compared between responders and nonresponders by mRECIST criteria by using unpaired Wilcoxon tests. Results All procedures were technically successful with no complications. Fourteen angiogenesis factors showed statistically significant changes following TAE, but most changes were transient. IL-6 was upregulated only 1 day after the procedure, but showed the largest increases of any factor. Osteopontin and VCAM-1 demonstrated sustained upregulation at all time points following TAE. At 3-month follow-up imaging, 11 patients had responses to TAE (complete response, n = 6; partial response, n = 5) and 11 patients were nonresponders (stable disease, n = 9; progressive disease, n = 2). In nonresponders, the percent change in IL-6 on the day after TAE (P = .033) and the mean percent change in osteopontin after TAE (P = .024) were significantly greater compared with those of responders. Conclusion Multiple angiogenesis factors demonstrated significant upregulation after TAE. VCAM-1 and osteopontin demonstrated sustained upregulation, whereas the rest were transient. IL-6 and osteopontin correlated significantly with radiologic response after TAE. © RSNA, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Ronald
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Andrew B Nixon
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Daniele Marin
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Gemini Janas
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Willa Chen
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Paul V Suhocki
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Waleska Pabon-Ramos
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - David R Sopko
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Mark D Starr
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - John C Brady
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Herbert I Hurwitz
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Charles Y Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology (J.R., D.M., R.T.G., G.J., W.C., P.V.S., W.P.R., D.R.S., C.Y.K.), and Department of Medicine (A.B.N., M.D.S., J.C.B., H.I.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dendy MS, Ludwig JM, Kim HS. Predictors and prognosticators for survival with Yttrium-90 radioembolization therapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:37912-37922. [PMID: 28415671 PMCID: PMC5514961 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This critical review aims to explore predictive and prognostic biomarkers of Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization therapy of colorectal liver metastases. A brief overview of established predictive and prognostic molecular and genetic biomarkers in colorectal cancer therapies will be discussed. A review of the literature on imaging modalities, genetic, metabolic and other molecular markers and the subsequent outcomes in post-Y90 treatment will be presented. How these biomarkers and future biomarker research can inform locoregional treatment decisions in the clinical setting of metastatic colorectal cancer lesions of the liver will be explored. There are opportunities for personalized cancer treatment in the setting of Y90 radioembolization. The ability to predict tumor response after Ytrium-90 radioembolization therapy can greatly impact clinical decision making and enhance treatment outcomes, therefore further research into the field is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meaghan S. Dendy
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Johannes M. Ludwig
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hyun S. Kim
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosenbaum CENM, van den Hoven AF, Braat MNGJA, Koopman M, Lam MGEH, Zonnenberg BA, Verkooijen HM, van den Bosch MAAJ. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases: a prospective cohort study on circulating angiogenic factors and treatment response. EJNMMI Res 2016; 6:92. [PMID: 28004357 PMCID: PMC5177600 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0236-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE) as a treatment for liver tumours induces radiation damage and hypoxia in liver tissue, which is also a trigger for systemic release of angiogenic factors, potentially stimulating tumour growth. We examined changes in circulating angiogenic factors following 90Y-RE and investigated the association between response and angiogenic factors. In this prospective study, 42 patients with unresectable, chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRCLM) were treated with 90Y-RE. Blood samples were collected pre-treatment and at 0, 1, 3, 7 and 30 days of follow-up. Response was measured with MRI according to RECIST 1.1 at 1 month and subsequently 3-month interval until progressive disease (PD) occurred. Associations between circulating angiogenic factors and response were examined with linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS Following 90Y-RE, three angiogenic factors demonstrated an increase in plasma levels, i.e., vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). Non-responders (= PD at 1-month follow-up, n = 10) had a significant increase of Ang-2 and HGF at 3 and 7 days post treatment compared to responders (= stable disease or better, n = 32), who showed little to no changes in plasma levels (respectively p = 0.01 and p = 0.007). Median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval 6.1-12.4). CONCLUSIONS Significant increases in plasma levels of Ang-2 and HGF in the first week after treatment were associated with rapid progressive disease of liver lesions at 1 month after 90Y-RE. Combination of 90Y-RE with anti-angiogenic therapy may reduce these effects and result in better response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E N M Rosenbaum
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - A F van den Hoven
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M N G J A Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B A Zonnenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M A A J van den Bosch
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yttrium-90 Radioembolization of Advanced, Unresectable Breast Cancer Liver Metastases-A Single-Center Experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27:1305-1315. [PMID: 27461588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2016] [Revised: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 05/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine value of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for palliative treatment of unresectable liver-dominant breast metastases (LdBM) and to determine prognostic parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records of patients undergoing TARE for progressing LdBM between June 2006 and March 2015 were retrospectively reviewed; 44 female patients (mean age 56.1 y; range, 34.9-85.3 y) underwent 69 TAREs (56 resin-based, 13 glass-based). Of 44 patients, 42 had bilobar disease. Mean administered activity was 1.35 GBq ± 0.71. Median clinical and imaging follow-up times were 121 days (range, 26-870 d; n = 42 patients) and 93 days (range, 26-2,037 d; n = 38 patients). Clinical and biochemical toxicities, imaging response (according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors), time to progression, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Data were analyzed with stratification according to clinical and procedural parameters. RESULTS Toxicities included 1 cholecystitis (grade 2) and 1 duodenal ulceration (grade 3); no grade ≥ 4 clinical toxicities were noted. Objective response rate (complete + partial response) was 28.9% (11/38); disease control rate (response + stable disease) was 71.1% (27/38). Median time to progression of treated liver lobe was 101 days (range, 30-2,037 d). During follow-up, 34/42 patients died (median OS after first TARE: 184 d [range 29-2,331 d]). On multivariate analysis, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0 (P < .0001, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.146) and low baseline γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels (P = .0146, HR = 0.999) were predictors of longer OS. CONCLUSIONS TARE can successfully delay progression of therapy-refractory LdBM with low complication rate. Nonelevated baseline ECOG status and low GGT levels were identified as prognostic factors.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lewandowski RJ, Andreoli JM, Hickey R, Kallini JR, Gabr A, Baker T, Kircher S, Salem R, Kulik L. Angiogenic Response following Radioembolization: Results from a Randomized Pilot Study of Yttrium-90 with or without Sorafenib. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27:1329-1336. [PMID: 27266362 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2015] [Revised: 03/25/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the regulation of serum angiogenic factors in patients with unresectable early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization alone vs with sorafenib. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a single-center pilot study, 23 patients with unresectable HCC awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation were prospectively randomized to receive radioembolization alone (n = 12) or radioembolization with sorafenib (n = 11). Serum angiogenic markers (angiopoietin-2 [Ang-2], hepatocyte growth factor, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, c-reactive protein, platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]) were assayed at baseline and at 2 and 4 weeks after radioembolization ((90)Y alone, n = 6; (90)Y plus sorafenib, n = 7). RESULTS In the (90)Y-alone group, all growth factors were elevated above baseline levels at 2 and 4 weeks: VEGF increased 36% vs baseline at 2 weeks and 22% at 4 weeks, and PDGF increased 24% at 2 weeks and 3% at 4 weeks. In the (90)Y/sorafenib arm, Ang-2 and PDGF decreased at 2 weeks and the remainder increased. By 4 weeks, only PDGF remained below baseline levels. VEGF increased 49% at 2 weeks and 28% at 4 weeks, and PDGF decreased 31% at 2 weeks and 39% at 4 weeks. Differences were statistically significant for hepatocyte growth factor (P = .03) and PDGF (P = .02) at 2 weeks and for IL-6 (P = .05) at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Radioembolization is associated with a mild increase in angiogenic markers. The addition of sorafenib blunts PDGF response; other factors such as VEGF remain unaffected. The predominant effect of sorafenib may be through downregulation of PDGF and not VEGF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Lewandowski
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611.
| | - Jessica M Andreoli
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Ryan Hickey
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Joseph R Kallini
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Ahmed Gabr
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Talia Baker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Sheetal Kircher
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Medicine, Division of Hepatology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Laura Kulik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hepatology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Edeline J, Coulouarn C, Crouzet L, Pracht M, Lepareur N, Clément B, Garin E. Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin, but Not Sorafenib or Paclitaxel, Have a Synergistic Effect with Yttrium-90 in Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Line Viability. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:1874-78.e2. [PMID: 26596183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Revised: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Edeline
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Av de la bataille Flandres Dunkerque, Rennes 35043, France; Inserm UMR991, Rennes, France.
| | | | - Laurence Crouzet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Av de la bataille Flandres Dunkerque, Rennes 35043, France; Inserm UMR991, Rennes, France
| | - Marc Pracht
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Av de la bataille Flandres Dunkerque, Rennes 35043, France
| | - Nicolas Lepareur
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Av de la bataille Flandres Dunkerque, Rennes 35043, France; Inserm UMR991, Rennes, France
| | | | - Etienne Garin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Av de la bataille Flandres Dunkerque, Rennes 35043, France; Inserm UMR991, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Molvar C, Lewandowski R. Yttrium-90 Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Performance, Technical Advances, and Future Concepts. Semin Intervent Radiol 2015; 32:388-97. [PMID: 26622103 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal tumor, claiming over half a million lives per year. Treatment of HCC is commonly performed without curative intent, and palliative options dominate, including catheter-based therapies, namely, transarterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization. This review will showcase the performance of (90)Y radioembolization for the treatment of HCC, focusing on recent seminal data and technical advances. In particular, novel radioembolization treatment concepts are discussed and compared with conventional HCC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Molvar
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Robert Lewandowski
- Division of Interventional Oncology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sangro B. Chemoembolization and radioembolization. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 28:909-19. [PMID: 25260317 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 08/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Chemoembolization and radioembolization are at the core of the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who cannot receive potentially curative therapies such as transplantation, resection or percutaneous ablation. They differ in the mechanism of action (ischaemia and increase cytotoxic drug exposure for chemoembolization, internal irradiation for radioembolization) and may target different patient populations. Chemoembolization with cytotoxic drug-eluting beads is a more standardized although not necessarily more effective way of performing chemoembolization. Cytoreduction is achieved in most patients but complete tumor ablation may be achieved and lead to extended survival. Grade 1 level of evidence support the use of chemoembolization for the treatment of patients in the early and intermediate stages while grade 2 evidence supports the use of radioembolization for the treatment of patients in intermediate to advanced stages. Selecting the best candidates for both techniques is still a work in progress that ongoing clinical trials are trying to address.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Sangro
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Avda, Pio XII 36, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|