Endovascular Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis with Rheolytic Thrombectomy: Final Report of the Prospective Multicenter PEARL (Peripheral Use of AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy with a Variety of Catheter Lengths) Registry

Which one is the best in treating deep venous thrombosis -- percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, catheter-directed thrombolysis or combination of them?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment outcomes among percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with AngioJet, Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and a combination of both.

METHODS

One hundred forty nine patients with acute or sub-acute iliac-femoral vein thrombosis accepting CDT and/or PMT were divided into three groups respectively: PMT group, CDT group, PMT + CDT group (PMT followed by CDT). The severity of thrombosis was evaluated by venographic scoring system. Technical success was defined as restored patent deep venous blood flow after CDT and/or PMT. Clinical follow-up were assessed by ultrasound or venography imaging. The primary endpoints were recurrence of DVT, and severity level of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Technical success and immediate clinical improvements were achieved on all patients. The proportion of sub-acute DVT and the venographic scoring in PMT + CDT group were significantly higher than that in CDT group and PMT group (proportion of sub-acute DVT: p = 0.032 and p = 0.005, respectively; venographic scoring: p < 0.001, respectively). The proportion of May-Thurner Syndrome was lower in PMT group than that in CDT and PMT + CDT group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.005, respectively). The proportion of DVT recurrence/stent thrombosis was significantly higher in CDT group than that in PMT + CDT group (p = 0.04). The severity of PTS was the highest in CDT group ( χ2 = 14.459, p = 0.006) compared to PMT group (p = 0.029) and PMT + CDT group (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Patients with sub-acute DVT, high SVS scoring and combined May-Thurner Syndrome were recommended to take PMT + CDT treatment and might have lower rate of DVT recurrence/stent thrombosis and severe PTS. Our study provided evidence detailing of PMT + CDT therapy.

Risk factors of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome within 2 years in patients with subacute thrombosis: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to study the risk factors influencing the occurrence of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) within 2 years in patients with subacute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

Seventy patients who developed moderate to severe PTS within 2 years after subacute lower extremity DVT from June 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected as the case group. They were matched 1:1 by sex and age (±5 years) with 70 patients who did not develop moderate to severe PTS during the same follow-up period as the control group. Multiple logistic regression, stratified analysis, and interaction analyses were used to explore the risk factors for moderate to severe PTS.

RESULTS

The multiple logistic regression model showed that patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis had a significantly increased risk of developing moderate to severe PTS within 2 years. Patients who underwent intraluminal intervention treatment during hospitalization had a significantly reduced risk. The odds ratios were 4.000 (95% confidence interval, 1.597-10.016) for the femoral-popliteal vein thrombosis and 0.262 (95% confidence interval, 0.106-0.647) for the anticoagulation treatment group. The stratified analysis showed that intraluminal intervention treatment was a protective factor against moderate to severe PTS within 2 years across different strata of hypertension, thrombus type, body mass index, duration of anticoagulation, and wearing compression stockings. Additionally, there was an interaction between thrombus type and treatment method, with intraluminal intervention treatment having a more pronounced effect on preventing moderate to severe PTS in patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Iliofemoral vein thrombosis is a risk factor for the development of moderate to severe PTS within 2 years in patients with subacute lower extremity DVT. Intraluminal intervention treatment can reduce the risk of moderate to severe PTS, especially in patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis.

Calf deep veins are safe and feasible accesses for the endovascular treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

This study was designed to assess the optimal access route for the endovascular treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis who underwent endovascular treatment from February 2009 to December 2020. Patients underwent non-direct calf deep vein puncture (NDCDVP) from February 2009 to December 2011 and direct calf deep vein puncture (DCDVP) from January 2012 to December 2020. Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) was used to treat all patients in the NDCDVP group, whereas patients in the DCDVP group were treated with CDT or the AngioJet rhyolitic thrombectomy system. In patients exhibiting iliac vein compression syndrome, the iliac vein was dilated and implanted with a stent. Technical success rates and perioperative complication rates were compared between these two treatment groups. The NDCDVP group included 83 patients (40 males, 43 females) with a mean age of 55 ± 16 years, while the DCDVP group included 487 patients (231 males. 256 females) with a mean age of 56 ± 15 years. No significant differences were observed between these groups with respect to any analyzed clinical characteristics. The technical success rates in the NDCDVP and DCDVP groups were 96.4 and 98.2%, respectively (P > 0.05). In the NDCDVP group, the small saphenous vein (SSV)or great saphenous vein (GSV)were the most common access routes (77.1%, 64/83), whereas the anterior tibial vein (ATV) was the most common access route in the DCDVP group (78.0%, 380/487), followed by the posterior tibial vein (PTV) and peroneal vein (PV)(15.6% and 6.4%, respectively). Relative to the NDCDVP group, more patients in the DCDVP group underwent the removal of deep vein clots below the knee (7.2% [6/83] vs. 24.2% [118/487], P < 0.001). Moreover, relative to the NDCDVP group, significantly lower complication rates were evident in the DCDVP group (local infection: 10.8% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001; local hematoma: 15.7% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001). The position change rate was also significantly lower in the DCDVP group relative to the NDCDVP group (0% [0/487] vs. 60.2% [50/83], P < 0.001). The calf deep veins (CDVs) represent a feasible and safe access route for the endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.

The Safety and Efficacy of ZelanteDVT™ Catheter Rheolytic Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Patients with Iliac Vein Stent Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

To examine the safety and efficacy of ZelanteDVT™ catheter rheolytic thrombectomy in the treatment of patients with iliac vein stent thrombosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis method was conducted by means of collecting the data of 32 patients who had completed the treatment of iliac vein stent thrombosis with ZelanteDVT catheter rheolytic thrombectomy from March 2019 to March 2023. Data on clinical characteristics, technical success, clinical success, complications, and early follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

The technical success rates were 100%, intraoperatively, in which 22 cases were improved to thrombus clearance Grade II (50-90%), 10 were Grade III (>90%). There were 21 cases treated with subsequent catheter-directed thrombolysis, and the average urokinase administration of (120.90 ± 29.63)∗10ˆ4 units. The clinical success rates were 100% and the swelling of the affected limbs were significantly improved, a significant difference in the pre/postoperative between-thigh circumference difference [(5.16 ± 1.08) vs. (1.75 ± 0.84), P < 0.000]. The pre/postoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score was [(12.94 ± 1.70) vs. (7.44 ± 1.31), P < 0.000]. No serious complications occurred during the perioperative period. The postoperative and 12-month stent patency rate was 100.00% (32/32) and 71.88% (23/32), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ZelanteDVT catheter rheolytic thrombectomy seems to have a promising application prospect for the treatment of patients with iliac vein stent thrombosis.

Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) ranks as a leading cause of in-hospital mortality and the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. The spectrum of PE manifestations varies widely, making it difficult to determine the best treatment approach for specific patients. Conventional treatment options include anticoagulation, thrombolysis, or surgery, but emerging percutaneous interventional procedures are being investigated for their potential benefits in heterogeneous PE populations. These novel interventional techniques encompass catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and hybrid approaches combining different mechanisms. Furthermore, inferior vena cava filters are also available as an option for PE prevention. Such interventions may offer faster improvements in right ventricular function, as well as in pulmonary and systemic haemodynamics, in individual patients. Moreover, percutaneous treatment may be a valid alternative to traditional therapies in high bleeding risk patients and could potentially reduce the burden of mortality related to major bleeds, such as that of haemorrhagic strokes. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of these techniques compared to conservative therapies have not been conclusively established. This review offers a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence for percutaneous interventions in PE and provides guidance for selecting appropriate patients and treatments. It serves as a valuable resource for future researchers and clinicians seeking to advance this field. Additionally, we explore future perspectives, proposing "percutaneous primary pulmonary intervention" as a potential paradigm shift in the field.

Initial experience with the ambulatory management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with May-Thurner syndrome with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVE

Patients undergoing intervention for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) typically require inpatient (IP) hospitalization for initial treatment with anticoagulation and management with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. Direct oral anticoagulants and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) devices offer the opportunity for outpatient (OP) management. We describe our approach with these patients.

METHODS

Patients receiving intervention for acute IFDVT from January 2020 through October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing unilateral thrombectomy, venous angioplasty, and stenting for IFDVT with MTS comprised the study population and were divided into two groups: (1) patients admitted to the hospital and treated as IPs and (2) patients who underwent therapy as OPs. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural success, complications, and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients were treated for IFDVT with thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting of whom 58 comprised the IP group and 34 the OP group. All 92 patients underwent PMT using the Inari ClotTriever (Inari Medical), intravascular ultrasound, angioplasty, and stenting with 100% technical success. Three patients in the IP group required adjuvant thrombolysis. There was no difference in primary patency of the treated IFDVT segment at 12 months between the two groups (IP, 73.5%; OP, 86.7%; P = .21, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute IFDVT and MTS deemed appropriate for thrombectomy and iliac revascularization can be managed with initiation of ambulatory direct oral anticoagulant therapy and subsequent return for ambulatory PMT, angioplasty, and stenting. This approach avoids the expense of IP care and allows for effective use of resources at a time when staffing and supply chain shortages have led to inefficiencies in the provision of IP care for nonemergent conditions.

Short-term outcomes of endovascular management of acute limb ischemia using aspiration mechanical thrombectomy

OBJECTIVE

Management of acute limb ischemia (ALI) has seen greater utilization of catheter-based interventions over the last two decades. Data on their efficacy is largely based on comparisons of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and open thrombectomy. During this time, many adjuncts to CDT have emerged with different mechanisms of action, including pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) and aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT). However, the safety and efficacy of newer adjuncts like AMT have not been well established. This study is a retrospective analysis of the contemporary management of ALI comparing patients treated with aspiration mechanical thrombectomy to patients treated with the more established CDT adjunct, pharmacomechanical thrombolysis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing peripheral endovascular intervention for ALI using an adjunctive device were identified through query of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) module from 2014 to 2019. Patients with a nonviable extremity (Rutherford ALI Stage 3), prior history of ipsilateral major amputation, popliteal aneurysm, procedures that were deemed elective (>72 h from admission), procedures that did not utilize an endovascular adjunctive device, and patients without short-term follow-up were all excluded from analysis. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of freedom from major amputation and/or death in the perioperative time period.

RESULTS

We identified 528 patients with Rutherford ALI Stage 1 or 2 who were treated with an endovascular adjunct. 433 patients did not undergo aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (no AMT group) and 95 patients did undergo aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT group). The amputation-free survival across all patients was 93.4%. There were significant differences in demographic, comorbidity, and treatment variables between groups (e.g., gender, prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), history of prior peripheral artery disease intervention, and history of prior infra-inguinal PVI), so a propensity score matched analysis was included to account for these group differences. In the propensity score matched analysis, there was no significant difference in major amputation (AMT 7.4% vs no AMT 3.2%, p = 0.13) or death (AMT 95.8% survival vs no AMT 98.4% survival, p = 0.23) with the use of aspiration mechanical thrombectomy. However, there was significantly worse amputation-free survival with the use of aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT 88.4% vs no AMT 95.3%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, prior supra-inguinal bypass (OR 4.85, 1.70-13.84, p = 0.003), Rutherford ALI Stage 2B (OR 3.13, 1.47-6.67, p = 0.003), and aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (OR 2.71, 1.03-7.17, p = 0.05) were associated with the composite outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term amputation-free survival rates of endovascular management of acute limb ischemia are adequate across all modalities. However, aspiration mechanical thrombectomy was associated with significantly worse amputation-free survival compared to other endovascular adjuncts alone (i.e., pharmacomechanical thrombolysis). Severe limb ischemia (Rutherford ALI Stage 2B) and prior supra-inguinal bypass were associated with worse amputation-free survival regardless of the choice of endovascular intervention.

In Vivo Porcine Model of Acute Iliocaval Deep Vein Thrombosis

CLINICAL IMPACT

The study establishes a rapid, technically straightforward, and reproducible porcine large animal model for acute iliocaval deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The procedure can be performed with basic endovascular skillsets. With its procedural efficiency and consistency, the platform is promising for comparative in vivo testing of venous thrombectomy devices in a living host, and for future verification and validation studies to determine efficacy of novel thrombectomy devices relative to predicates.

The background and role of catheter-directed thrombolysis evolving procedures for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

Minimal invasive treatment such as early endovenous thrombus removal for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) emerged in the end of last century. The principle is catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using either plasminogen activating agents alone, as ultrasound-assisted CDT, or in combination with mechanical devices as pharmaco-mechanical CDT. The interest for this treatment modality is the high rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with anticoagulation (AC) alone, especially after iliofemoral DVT. Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early thrombus removal with AC alone, as well as non-randomized studies, have demonstrated favorable rates, or at least a decrease of moderate and severe PTS, in favor of these procedures. This article will summarize the background and evolution of the procedures in the last three decades and discuss fundamental criteria for inclusion and exclusion, focusing on the procedures regarding thrombus age and location, technical issues, complications and results including different outcome measures for PTS, for which iliac DVT involvement is a massive risk factor to be prevented.

Effects of Deep Venous Thrombosis Treatments on Early and Long-term Quality of Life: Medical Therapy vs. Systemic Thrombolysis vs. Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to compare the effects of medical therapy (MT), systemic thrombolysis (ST), and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) methods used in our clinic for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on symptom reduction, the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) development, and quality of life.

METHODS

Data from160 patients diagnosed with acute DVT between January 2012 and May 2021 and treated and followed up in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to treatment method. The patients who received MT treatment were defined as Group 1, anticoagulant treatment after ST as Group 2, and anticoagulant treatment after PMT as Group 3. The patients were called to the outpatient clinic, informed consent was obtained, EuroQol-5D-3 L (EQ-5D-3 L) scoring and Villalta scoring were performed, and anamnesis was taken.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were included, with 71 (44.4%) patients in Group 1, 45 (28.1%) in Group 2, and 44 (27.5%) in Group 3. The mean age was 48.9 ± 14.9 years for Group 1, 42.2 ± 10.8 for Group 2, and 29.0 ± 7.2 for Group 3. When the time to return to normal life and the EQ-5D-3 L score index were compared, the differences between Groups 1 and 2 and between Groups 1 and 3 were statistically significant (P = .000 and P = .000, respectively). However, the differences between Groups 2 and 3 were statistically insignificant (P = .213 andp = .074, respectively). When Villalta scores and EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) scores were compared between groups, the difference between all groups was statistically significant (P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

The medical treatment alone was observed to be insufficient in terms of symptomatic improvement, development of PTS, quality of life, and long-term complications. When the ST and PMT groups were compared, it was determined that PMT treatment was more advantageous in terms of EQ-VAS score and PTS development, although there was no statistical difference regarding complications, such as return to normal life and long-term quality of life, the incidence of recurrent DVT development, and pulmonary thromboembolism incidence.

Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and thrombectomy (PCDT) plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs CDT alone for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and summarize the clinical experience, safety outcomes, and short- and long-term efficacy.

METHODS

We performed a 4-year retrospective, case-control study. A total of 95 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a symptom duration of ≤7 days involving the iliac and/or common femoral veins underwent endovascular interventions. The patients were divided into two groups according to their clinical indications: PCDT plus CDT vs CDT alone. Statistical analyses were used to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. Additionally, the patients were followed up for 3 to 36 months after treatment, and the proportions of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and moderate to severe PTS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method.

RESULTS

A total of 95 consecutive patients were analyzed in this retrospective study, of whom, 51 underwent CDT alone and 44 underwent PCDT plus CDT. Between the two groups, in terms of immediate-term efficacy and safety, significant differences were found in the catheter retention time (60.64 ± 12.04 hours vs 19.42 ± 4.04 hours; P < .001), dosages of urokinase required (5.82 ± 0.81 million units vs 1.80 ± 0.64 million units; P < .001), the detumescence rate at 24 hours postoperatively (48.46% ± 8.62% vs 76.79% ± 7.98%; P = .026), the descent velocity of D-dimer per day (2266.28 ± 1358.26 μg/L/D vs 3842.34 ± 2048.02 μg/L/D; P = .018), total hospitalization stay (6.2 ± 1.40 days vs 3.8 ± 0.70 days; P = .024), number of postoperative angiograms (2.4 ± 0.80 vs 1.2 ± 0.30; P = .042), and grade III venous patency (>95% lysis: 54.5% vs 68.6%; P = .047). Furthermore, during the follow-up period, significant differences were found in the incidence of PTS (Villalta scale ≥5 or a venous ulcer: 47.0% vs 27.7%; P = .037), and the incidence proportion of moderate to severe PTS at 12 months (15.7% vs 4.5%; P = .024) and 24 months (35.3% vs 11.4%; P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CDT alone, in the iliofemoral DVT subgroup with a symptom duration of ≤7 days, PCDT plus CDT could significantly relieve early leg symptoms, shorten the hospitalization stay, reduce bleeding complications, promote long-term venous patency, and decrease the occurrence of PTS and the incidence proportion of moderate to severe PTS. Thus, the short- and long-term outcomes both support the superiority of PCDT plus CDT vs CDT in this subgroup.

Clinical efficacy of ZelanteDVT™ catheter rheolytic thrombectomy in the single-session treatment of patients with subacute deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of novel ZelanteDVT™ catheter rheolytic thrombectomy in the single-session endovascular management of subacute deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 31 patients with subacute DVT who underwent ZelanteDVT™ catheter rheolytic thrombectomy. Procedure data, associated complications, and venous patency score were recorded. The deep venous patency and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) rate were assessed in all patients during follow-up visits.

RESULTS

After procedure, 19.4% (6/31) patients improved to grade III thrombus removal, while the remaining patients improved to grade II. Significant iliac vein compression syndrome was identified in 54.8% (17/31) patients, and 82.4% (14/17) of them received stent implantation. No serious procedure-related complications occurred. The median follow-up time was 13 months. The primary patency rate at 12 months was 83.87%, and the incidence of PTS was 19.35%.

CONCLUSION

This novel rheological thrombectomy catheter seems to have a promising application prospect for single-session treatment of subacute DVT.

Catheter Directed Thrombectomy and Other Deep Venous Interventions in Cancer Patients

Treating cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis/venous thromboembolism (DVT/VTE) can be challenging as patients are frequently unable to receive the standard therapy of anticoagulation due to the increased risk of bleeding complications seen in this population. Similarly, the hesitation of interventionalists to use thrombolytic agents due to bleeding risks limits percutaneous intervention options as well. Further, outcome data and guidelines do not exist for oncologic patients and often treatment is tailored to patient-specific factors after multidisciplinary discussion. This article reviews specific factors to consider when planning percutaneous treatment of cancer patients with DVT/VTE, focusing on the iliocaval system.

Observation of the effect of angiojet to treat acute lower extremity arterial embolization

BACKGROUND

Through significant advances in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease, acute ischemia of the lower extremity is still associated with significant morbidity, limb threat and mortality. The two main causes of acute ischemia in lower extremities are arterial embolism and atherosclerotic arteries. Timely recognition and treatment of acute limb ischemia in emergency situations is essential in order to minimize the duration of ischemia.

AIM

To investigate the application effect of angiojet thrombolysis in the treatment of acute lower extremity arterial embolization.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with acute lower extremity arterial embolization admitted to our hospital from May 2018 to May 2020 were selected. Among them, the observation group (twenty-eight cases) had received angiojet thrombolysis, and the control group (thirty-four cases) had received femoral artery incision and thrombectomy. After thrombus clearance, significant residual stenosis of the lumen was combined with balloon dilation and/or stent implantation. When the thrombus removal was not satisfactory, catheter-directed thrombolysis was performed. The incidence of postoperative complications, recurrence rate and recovery of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in postoperative recurrence (target vessel reconstruction rate), anklebrachial index and the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05); there were statistically significant differences in postoperative pain score and postoperative rehabilitation between the two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The application of angiojet in the treatment of acute lower limb artery thromboembolism disease is safe and effective, minimally invasive, quicker recovery after operation, less postoperative complications, which is more suitable for the treatment of femoral popliteal arterial thromboembolism lesions. If the thrombus removal is not satisfactory, the combination of coronary artery aspiration catheter and catheterized directed thrombolysis can be used. Balloon dilation and stent implantation can be considered for obvious lumen stenosis.

Catheter-based therapies and short-term outcomes in the oncological patients with acute inferior vena cava thrombosis: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of catheter-based therapy (CBT) using AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) device or large lumen catheter (LLC) in the oncological patients with inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including eligible patients with IVCT treated with CBT coupled with dose-reduced thrombolysis as the first-line treatment from February 1, 2015 to January 1, 2022. The baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, treatment details, course data were all reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients (mean age 58.8 years, 57.6% male) was included, of whom 17 patients underwent ART and 16 underwent LLC aspiration, the technical success rates were 100%. All patients subsequently underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis relative to reduced-dose thrombolysis. At the end of catheter-directed thrombolysis, clinical success was achieved in 26 (78.8%) patients. In the subgroup analysis, ART seemed to receive a slightly higher rate of thrombus removal Grade III (47.1% vs 12.5%, p = .057). The symptoms of leg pain and swelling post-treatment were significantly improved in both groups (p < .001). Except for transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria occurring in patients with ART, none of all patients suffered from procedure-related adverse events and major complications. Minor complications such as bleeding events occurred in 6.1% (2/33) of patients. At the 6 month follow-up, the incidence of recurrent thrombosis and mild post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) were 9.7% (3/31) and 6.5% (2/31).

CONCLUSION

CBT is a safe and effective modality for the management of IVCT in the oncological patients, leading to high levels of technical and clinical success, symptoms alleviation, as well as a low incidence of minor complication, mild PTS and recurrence.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE STATEMENT

The available data and evidence of endovascular therapy (ET) on oncologic patients with IVCT remains insufficient. The purpose of present single center retrospective study including 33 oncological patients is to investigate the preliminary safety and efficacy of CBT using ART device or LLC. The results demonstrated that CBTs are safe and effective as an ET modality in majority of eligible patients with symptomatic acute cancer-associated IVCT, indicating high levels of technical and clinical success, symptoms alleviation, as well as a low prevalence of minor complication, mild post-thrombotic syndrome and recurrence. Furthermore, they have the advantages of accelerated reduction of thrombus burden in a moderate time, speedy restoration of blood flow, but at the risk of potentially increased economic cost. Notably, in the condition of parallel time and dosages of lytic agents, ART tends to achieve a slightly higher thrombus removal Grade III than LLCA.

Massive DVT from the proximal IVC to the pedal vein: Our approach using aspiration mechanical thrombectomy and open surgery thrombectomy

Deep venous thrombosis might present in an acute condition requiring early thrombus removal. Several endovascular and surgical approaches are available with a short treatment time and minimal complications compared to pharmacotherapies. However, due to a lack of evidence, these are not the first treatment choice for deep vein thrombosis. Our case report showed a successful multimodality treatment for an acute-on-chronic massive deep vein thrombosis from the inferior vena cava to the pedal vein. A 47-year-old with chief complaints of cold, significant swelling, and severe pain in her left leg was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis through Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The patient received aspiration mechanical thrombectomy with the "kissing catheter" technique, adjunctive stent, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and open surgical thrombectomy by Fogarty catheter without recurrence and complication.

Rheolytic thrombectomy using an AngioJet ZelanteDVT catheter or a Solent Omni catheter for patients with proximal vein thrombosis

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate the preliminary safety and efficacy of rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) using an AngioJet Zelante DVT catheter or a Solent Omni catheter for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 40 patients who were treated with an AngioJet RT between January 2019 and January 2021, and then the patients were divided into the ZelanteDVT group (n = 17) and the Solent group (n = 23). Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, technical success, clinical success, complications, and early follow-up were analysed.

RESULTS

No significant differences regarding demographics were detected (all p > .05). The technical success rates were both 100%. The ZelanteDVT group had a shorter duration of RT and a higher primary RT success than the Solent group (all p < .05), and the percentage of adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) was 29.4% in the ZelanteDVT group, which was significantly lower than the 73.9% in the Solent group (p = .010). The clinical success rates for the ZelanteDVT group and Solent group were 100% (17/17) and 95.7% (22/23), respectively, and these values were high in the two groups (p > .05). Apart from transient macroscopic haemoglobinuria occurring in all the patients during the first 24 hours post-RT, none of the patients in either group suffered other procedure-related adverse events or major complications. Minor complications included bleeding events in 21.7% (5/23) of the patients in the Solent group and one (5.9%) patient in the ZelanteDVT group (p > .05). At 6 months, the frequency of PTS was 5.9% (1/17) in the ZelanteDVT group and 17.4% (4/23) in the Solent group (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Both catheters are safe and effective in managing patients with proximal DVT, thus leading to improved clinical outcomes with few complications. The ZelanteDVT catheter was more effective than the Solent catheter in thrombectomy, thus allowing for faster extraction of the DVT with a shorter run time and lower proportions of patients with adjunctive CDT.

Effect of the timing of iliac vein stent implantation on catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis patients with severe iliac vein stenosis: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of the timing of iliac vein stent implantation on catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) patients with severe iliac vein stenosis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 66 patients with acute lower extremity DVT complicated with severe iliac vein stenosis from May 2017 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups by timing of iliac vein stent implantation: group A (iliac vein stent implantation before CDT treatment) for 34 and group B (iliac vein stent implantation after CDT treatment) for 32. The detumescence rate of affected limb, the thrombus clearance rate, the thrombolytic efficiency, the complication rate, the hospitalization cost, the stent patency rate within 1 year, and the scores (venous clinical severity score, Villalta, and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score) at 1 year postoperatively were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The thrombolytic efficiency of group A was higher than that of group B, while the incidence of complications and hospitalization expenses in group A were lower than those in group B. There was no statistical significance in the detumescence rate of affected limb, the thrombus clearance rate, the stent patency rate within 1 year, and the scores (VCSS, Villalta, and CIVIQ score) at 1 year postoperatively between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For acute lower extremity DVT patients with severe iliac vein stenosis, iliac vein stent implantation before CDT treatment can improve the thrombolytic efficiency, and reduce the incidence of complications and hospitalization costs.

AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients: Increase the risk of acute kidney injury?

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of acute kidney injury in elderly patients compared with nonelderly patients undergoing AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis between November 1, 2014 and August 1, 2022 was conducted. Their baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, procedural details, and postoperative course were reviewed.

Results

A total of 105 eligible patients were reviewed; 45 patients were in the elderly group, and 60 were in the nonelderly group. Except for age (p < 0.001), no significant differences regarding demographics were detected (p >0.05). Transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria occurred in all patients during the first 24 h post-AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy. The overall morbidity of acute kidney injury in the two groups was 11.4%, and the nonelderly group had a similar rate of acute kidney injury (8.3%) to the elderly group (15.6%). None of the 12 patients progressed to dialysis within the postoperative period, and the mean acute kidney injury recovery time of the elderly group was 5.86 ± 1.57 days, which was longer than the 3.60 ± .89 days of the nonelderly group (p = 0.017).

Conclusion

The use of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of patients with acute deep vein thrombosis is associated with a potential risk of acute kidney injury, which seems to have a comparable rate in elderly and nonelderly patients. acute kidney injury in the elderly group tends to need a longer recovery time, which requires postoperative vigilance for this population.

Angiojet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulant therapy alone in massive cancer-associated thrombosis: a single centre retrospective cohort study

The therapeutic regimen option for the cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) patients is still a major clinical challenge. The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) with AngioJet treatment compared with the conventional anticoagulation alone therapy in the patients with CAT. We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent PCDT and/or anticoagulation for the treatment of CAT between August 1, 2016 and March 1, 2022. Each patient was divided into the PCDT group or the anticoagulation alone group. The baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, treatment details, course data were reviewed. A total of 51 eligible patients were included, of whom 21 were in PCDT group (mean age, 60.1 ± 13.0 years; 52.4% male) and 30 in anticoagulation alone group (mean age, 66.6 ± 11.1 years; 50.0% male). No significant differences regarding age, sex, onset time, limb characteristics, cancer conditions or risk factors were detected (p > .05). After PCDT, grade III lysis was achieved in 8 and grade II lysis in 11 patients. Clinical success was achieved in 90.5% (19/21) patients. The symptoms of leg pain and swelling were significantly improved in both groups. Except for transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria occurring in PCDT group, none of all patients suffered from procedure-related and major complications. Minor complications such as bleeding events occurred in 23.8% (5/21) of patients in PCDT group compared with 10.0% (3/30) in anticoagulation alone group (p > .05). At the 6-month follow-up, iliofemoral patency was found an absolute risk reduction of 37.9% (70.0 vs. 32.1%) (95% CI: 1.183-4.008%; P = 0.010). The incidence of mild PTS was 5.0% (1/20) in PCDT group compared with 10.7% (3/28) in anticoagulation alone group (p > .05). The PCDT is a safe and effective modality in managing patients with CAT, leading to improved clinical outcomes with a low complication. The PCDT was more effective than anticoagulation alone in massive symptom relief and venous patency.

Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on the Endovascular Management of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

PURPOSE

To establish the updated position of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) on the endovascular management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary writing group with expertise in treating venous diseases was convened by SIR. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies on the topic of interest. Recommendations were drafted and graded according to the updated SIR evidence grading system. A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus agreement on the recommendation statements.

RESULTS

A total of 84 studies, including randomized trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, prospective single-arm studies, and retrospective studies were identified and included in the review. The expert writing group developed 17 recommendations that pertain to the care of patients with acute iliofemoral DVT with the use of endovascular venous interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

SIR considers endovascular thrombus removal to be an acceptable treatment option in selected patients with acute iliofemoral DVT. Careful individualized risk assessment, high-quality general DVT care, and close monitoring during and after procedures should be provided.

Single-Stage Endovascular Thrombectomy and Stenting as the First-Line Strategy in the Treatment of Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens Caused by Iliac Vein Lesions

BACKGROUND

Phlegmasia cerulea dolens (PCD) is a rare and serious complication of deep venous thrombosis and iliac vein lesions (IVLs) are the most common cause of PCD. The purpose of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of single-stage endovascular thrombus removal and stenting to treat PCD caused by IVLs.

METHODS

Clinical data of 13 patients with PCD secondary to IVL were retrospectively analyzed. They underwent endovascular thrombus removal, including rheolytic thrombectomy, manual aspiration thrombectomy, and simultaneous iliac vein stenting after thrombus removal. The safety and efficacy of single-stage endovascular thrombectomy and stenting in the treatment of PCD were evaluated.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100% (13/13). Postoperative symptoms were significantly relieved in all patients. There were no perioperative major bleeding complications or other critical adverse events. Two (15.4%) patients had slightly elevated serum creatinine concentration after surgery, which returned to normal before discharge. At the 12-month follow-up, the stent primary patency rate was 81.8% and there were no cases of severe post-thrombotic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage endovascular thrombectomy and stenting in PCD due to IVLs was minimally invasive, safe, and effective; it is recommended as a first-line treatment for PCD caused by IVLs.

Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Treating Post-Partum Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous thrombectomy for treating postpartum iliofemoral vein thrombosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with continuous postpartum acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis who were treated in our center, including all patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) or only catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) (study group), and patients that received simple anticoagulation treatment (control group). We evaluated the incidence of lower extremity postthrombotic syndrome, recanalization rate of lower extremity veins, and complications in the study and control groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 72 postpartum women were included in this study, including the PMT combined with CDT group (14 cases, 15 limbs), CDT alone group (26 cases, 27 limbs), and anticoagulant therapy alone group (32 cases, 34 limbs). The thrombectomy group completed the treatment with a technical success rate of 100%, and no serious bleeding complications occurred. The patency rate of lower limb veins in the thrombectomy group was 85.09 ± 16.51% after treatment and 82.60 ± 21.45% after 1 year. At the 1-year follow-up, the Villalta score in the study group was lower (1.90 ± 2.45 vs 8.50 ± 5.33, P < .001), and the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome was significantly different between the groups (17.50% in the study group vs 68.75% in the anticoagulant group, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower extremity venous thrombectomy is a safe and effective treatment for postpartum iliofemoral venous thrombosis. It can improve the patency rate of lower extremity veins and reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome compared with anticoagulation alone.

ClotTriever system for mechanical thrombectomy of deep vein thrombosis

There is increasing evidence that early and comprehensive removal of thrombus in deep vein thrombosis is associated with improved outcomes, including decreased incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome and debilitating long-term symptoms. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is effective for the rapid removal of clot, but it is associated with high bleeding risk. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy is a highly effective method for the removal of clot without the use of systemic or catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. The Inari ClotTriever system (Inari Medical Inc., CA, USA) is a thrombectomy device, which is approved for deep vein thrombosis by the US FDA in 2017. Herein we review the current treatment strategies using the ClotTriever system, its specifications, indications and current state of literature.

Catheter-Directed Interventions for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) leads to significant morbidity including pain, swelling, and difficulty walking in the affected limb. If left untreated, DVT increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and post thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The objective of this review was to identify catheter-directed interventions and their success rates for the treatment of lower extremity DVT. A comprehensive search of current and emerging catheter-directed interventions for lower extremity DVT treatment was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. Clinical trials, retrospective and prospective observational studies, and case reports were identified to classify percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and pharmacomechanical CDT (PCDT) devices based on their mechanism of action and indication of use. Catheter-directed interventions such as PMT, CDT, and PCDT offer an alternative therapeutic strategy for DVT management, particularly in patients with limb-threatening conditions and absolute contraindications to anticoagulants. Currently, there are limited guidelines for the use of mechanical and pharmacomechanical devices because of the lack of clinical evidence available for their use in treatment. Future studies are required to determine the short and long-term effects of using catheter-directed interventions as well as their effectiveness in treating acute versus subacute and chronic DVT.

Advances in Percutaneous Management of Pulmonary Embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Systemic anticoagulation remains the recommended treatment for low-risk PE. Systemic thrombolysis is the recommended treatment for PE with hemodynamic compromise (massive/high-risk PE). A significant number of patients are not candidates for systemic thrombolysis due to the bleeding risk associated with thrombolytics. Historically, surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) was recommended for massive PE with hemodynamic compromise for these patients. In the last decade, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has largely replaced SPE in the patient population with intermediate risk PE (submassive), defined as right heart strain (as evidenced by right ventricle enlargement on echocardiogram and/or computed tomography, usually along with elevation of troponin or B-type natriuretic peptide). Use of CDT increased in the last few years due to high incidence of PE in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia, and the use of mechanical thrombectomy (initially reserved for those with contraindications to thrombolysis) has also grown. In this article, we discuss the value of the PE response team, our approach to management of submassive (intermediate risk) and massive (high risk) PE with systemic thrombolytics, CDT, mechanical thrombectomy, and surgical embolectomy.

Combined pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with selective catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and the outcomes of combined percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with selective catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Methods

Between March 2018 and February 2020, a total of 37 patients (21 males, 16 females; mean age: 55±13.8 years; range, 21 to 79 years) with symptomatic acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis who underwent combined percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received a three-step therapy: (i) insertion of a temporary inferior vena cava filter, (ii) percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy via rotational mechanical thrombectomy device with an adjuvant 0.15 mg/kg recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator alteplase, and (iii) catheter-directed thrombolysis with continuous 1 mg/h tissue-type plasminogen activator alteplase. Data including demographic characteristics of the patients, bleeding complications, technical success, and adjuvant angioplasty rates were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate freedom from re-thrombosis at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up was calculated.

Results

The majority of the patients had left-sided (n=22, 59.4%) proximal deep vein thrombosis. Successful insertion of the inferior vena cava filter was achieved in 97.2% (n=36) of patients. The technical success rate was 89.1% (n=33). Adjuvant venous angioplasty was performed in four patients (10.8%) and no venous stents were used. No major bleeding was occurred, while minor bleeding was observed mostly in the form of hematuria (n=12, 32.4%). No mortality was observed. The 3, 6, and 12-month freedom from re-thrombosis rates were 96.3%, 92.6%, and 86.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

Combined percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis seems to be an effective and safe treatment of the iliofemoral acute deep vein thrombosis with acceptable minor bleeding complications post-interventionally.

Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment on Pregnancy-Related Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Objective: This study investigates the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatments on pregnancy-related iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 46 patients who had symptomatic pregnancy-related iliofemoral DVT and underwent endovascular treatment. The patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) were classified as the CDT group. In contrast, those treated with CDT combined with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) or angioplasty/stenting were classified as the pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) group. Results: Based on the immediate post-operative clot burden reduction rate analysis of 46 patients: 22 cases were completely dissolved (lysis grades III), 12 were partially dissolved (lysis grades II), and 12 failed (lysis grades I). There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of clot burden reduction between the CDT group (n = 19) and the PCDT group (n = 27) (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bleeding events between the two groups (p = 0.989). At 24 months, cumulative venous patency in the CDT group was 50.0%, compared to 78.2% in the PCDT group. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in Villalta score (p = 0.001) and venous severity scoring (VCSS score) (p = 0.005) between the two groups. Conclusions: CDT treatment combined with PMT or angioplasty/stenting is comparatively safe and effective for pregnant-related DVT patients. PCDT outperforms CDT in terms of immediate efficacy and reduces the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome with better midterm outcomes.

Single-Session Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Iliocaval and Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Technical Results of a Prospective Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the short-term results of single-session treatment of iliocaval and iliofemoral DVT using a single thrombectomy device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective pilot study analyzed patients with acute iliocaval or iliofemoral DVT treated in a single session using the JETi thrombectomy system. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The cohort consisted of 53 limbs in 47 patients (27 women), with a mean age of 57 years (range, 16-88 years). The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) and reestablishment of unobstructed flow in a single session, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean duration of symptoms was 8.5 days ± SD 9.2, with 10 patients (11 limbs, 21.3%) presenting with a symptom duration of >14 days. Twelve (25.5%) patients had thrombosis of the inferior vena cava and the iliofemoral segments. During the index procedure, unobstructed flow was reestablished in 47 of 53 (88.6%) limbs in 41 of 47 (87.2%) patients (primary endpoint) with no MAEs through 30 days. Overall, unobstructed flow was restored in 50 of 53 (94.3%) limbs and in 44 of 47 (93.6%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful single-session treatment of patients with acute iliocaval and iliofemoral DVT is feasible with a high rate of efficacy and a low rate of adverse events. Such patients may be treated on an outpatient basis.

Impact of the Result of Continued Thrombolysis After Stenting Following Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis-A Retrospective Study

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare the procedure and treatment outcomes of using either direct stenting alone following pharmacomechanical thrombectomy or continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting for treatment of acute left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis while clot removal degree achieved grade III.

Methods

From March 2018 to May 2019, 82 patients who underwent iliac venous stenting for treatment of acute left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with iliac vein stenosis after pharmacomechanical thrombectomy therapy using the AngioJet system while Clot removal degree achieved grade III were divided into two groups: Direct stenting alone group (n = 39) and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting group (n = 43). Comparisons were made regarding the treatment outcomes, stent patency rate, and Villalta scale between these two groups.

Results

No serious perioperative complications occurred. The mean urokinase dose and hospitalization time in the stenting alone group and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after the stenting group were 0.30 million U versus 1.76 ± 0.54 million U and 4.85 ± 0.93 days versus 6.33 ± 1.02 days, (P < .001). In the first 30 days after the operation, there were 3 recurrent episodes of deep vein thrombosis in the stenting alone group (P = 0.064). Each patient has completed at least one year of follow-up, the mean follow-up was 15.95 ± 3.44 months. Overall cumulative stent patency rates were 87.2% in stenting alone group and 97.7% in continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting group at 12months (P = 0.037). The Villalta scores at 12 months had a significant difference between the two groups. The mean Villalta scores in the stenting alone group and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after the stenting group were 4.44 ± 1.63 and 1.63 ± 1.29, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

When the clot removal degree of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy thrombectomy reaches grade III, both stenting alone and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting are effective treatment modalities. For young patients with low bleeding risk, continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting has a better patency rate and a lower 1-year post-thrombotic syndrome risk and does not increase major bleeding events. However, it may increase the time and costs of hospitalization accordingly.

Unclogging the effects of the Angiojet® thrombectomy system on kidney function: a case report

Background

AngioJet® is an increasingly used method of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of patients with arterial and venous thromboses. AngioJet® has been shown to cause intravascular haemoylsis universally. We report the case of a 29 year old patient who underwent AngioJet® thrombectomy and post-procedure developed a stage 3 Acute kidney injury (AKI.) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), secondary to intravascular haemolysis. We aim to explore the mechanism and potential risk factors associated with developing AKI in these patients and suggest steps to optimise patient management.

Case presentation

A 29 year old Caucasian male who developed a stage 3 AKI, requiring RRT, following AngioJet® thrombectomy for an occluded femoral vein stent. Urine and laboratory investigations showed evidence of intravascular haemolysis, which was the likely cause of AKI. Following a brief period of RRT he completely recovered renal function.

Conclusions

AKI is an increasingly recognised complication following AngioJet® thrombectomy, but remains underappreciated in clinical practice. AKI results from intravascular haemolysis caused by the device. Up to 13% of patients require RRT, but overall short-term prognosis is good. Pre-procedural risk factors for the development of AKI include recent major surgery. Sodium bicarbonate should be administered to those who develop renal impairment. Renal biopsy is high risk and does not add to management. Increased clinician awareness and vigilance for AKI post-procedure can allow for early recognition and referral to nephrology services for ongoing management.

Endovascular management of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis with combined approach

The combined used of thrombectomy with direct intravenous thrombolytic infusion provided effective treatment of DVT and uncovered an underlying left common iliac vein stenosis, which was successfully managed by angioplasty and stenting.

Application of the AngioJet Ultra Thrombectomy Device for the Percutaneous Mechanical Treatment (PMT) of Iliac Limb Occlusion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)

BACKGROUND

To investigate the safety and efficacy of applying the AngioJet Ultra thrombectomy device in treating endograft occlusions in the iliac arteries following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

This study utilized a retrospective analysis of 452 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Twelve of the patients experienced iliac limb occlusion during their follow-up period, and the AngioJet Ultra thrombectomy device was used in tandem with iliac angioplasty to treat these patients. The safety of the device was assessed through the amount of blood drawn, the duration of the procedure, and the occurrence of post-operative complications, while its efficacy was assessed through aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging and post-operative symptomatology results.

RESULTS

All 12 patients were male, and they had a mean age of 62.8 ± 11.8 years. Iliac limb occlusion occurred on the left side of 4 patients and on the right side of 8 patients. The AngioJet Ultra thrombectomy device was used together with iliac angioplasty during surgery, with a success rate of 100%. A bifurcated endograft was successfully implanted in 9 patients following AngioJet Ultra thrombectomy and balloon dilation angioplasty, while a unibody endograft was successfully implanted in 3 patients following AngioJet Ultra thrombectomy and balloon dilation angioplasty. The mean surgery duration was 2.4 hrs, and the patients were hospitalized for an average of 4.5 days. After surgery, the patients' intermittent claudication/buttock claudication gradually vanished. Two patients experienced hemoglobinuria, with one of them developing mild renal dysfunction. Currently, the twelve patients have been followed up for an average of 12 months, and none have experienced any lower extremity ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the AngioJet Ultra thrombectomy device as a supplementary treatment for iliac limb occlusion following abdominal EVAR is safe, effective, and minimally invasive.

Two New Methods of Supine Venographically Guided Popliteal Vein Puncture: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Presently, the prone position is necessary for popliteal vein puncture access, but it makes the patients uncomfortable and does not allow traditional femoral or jugular access. To address these deficiencies, this study introduces two new methods, anterior and medial access carried out in the supine position.

METHODS

Venous interventions with punctures in the popliteal vein of 120 limbs in 97 patients were performed during the period from February 2017 to April 2019. After puncture, venographic guidance was achieved by dorsal vein injection of contrast medium. Interventional therapy was performed after puncture and insertion of the introducer sheath.

RESULTS

In all, 120 limbs were punctured in the popliteal vein, with technical success in 118 (98.3% in total) cases: 100%, 96.1%, and 100% successful punctures in, respectively, 32 anterior, 49 medial, and 37 posterior access cases. A comparison of the three groups revealed that the fluoroscopy time and duration of puncture were longer in the medial and anterior access groups than in the posterior access group. The rate of intra-operative and post-operative complications was 7.5% (9/120), with no statistically significant difference between the three access groups. Compared with the pre-operative median score of 2.5, the post-operative SVS (Society of Vascular Surgery) score of the popliteal vein was reduced to 1.5 in the anterior and 0.5 in the medial groups.

CONCLUSION

Medial and anterior puncture of the popliteal vein in the supine position can be used as a safe alternative in venous endovascular therapy. The two new methods can mitigate frailty or respiratory problems resulting from the prone position and facilitate traditional femoral and jugular access.

Clinical Outcomes of a Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Venous Thrombolysis Strategy that Included Rheolytic Thrombectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical outcomes of a pharmacomechanical catheter-directed venous thrombolysis (PCDT) strategy that included AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy.

METHODS

In the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis multicenter randomized trial, physicians at 33 sites designated AngioJet as their preferred device for PCDT. In these sites, 364 patients with acute proximal lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were randomized to a strategy of PCDT that incorporated either AngioJet along with anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone. Relief from presenting DVT symptoms was evaluated over 30 days of follow-up. Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), quality of life (QOL), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and safety were evaluated over 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Within 30 days, AngioJet-PCDT led to a greater improvement in leg swelling (mean difference calf circumference 0.55 cm, P = .009), venous QOL (mean difference 6.5 Venous Insufficiency Epidemiologic and Economic Study [VEINES]-QOL points, P = .0073), and venous symptoms (mean difference 5.6 VEINES-symptoms points, P = .0134) than control, with differences most apparent in iliofemoral DVT. AngioJet-PCDT reduced PTS at 6 months (24% with AngioJet-PCDT vs 40% with control, P = .003) but did not influence PTS or QOL between 12 and 24 months. Major bleeding, pulmonary embolism, renal failure, and bradycardia were infrequent with AngioJet-PCDT (<2% each), but 24-month VTE recurrence may have been more frequent (13.9% with AngioJet-PCDT vs 6.8% with control, P = .03) CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute proximal DVT, a treatment strategy that included first-line AngioJet-PCDT was reasonably safe and led to an improved symptom status and venous QOL at 1 month and reduced PTS at 6 months compared with anticoagulation alone. However, AngioJet-PCDT did not influence PTS or the QOL beyond 6 months and may have increased recurrent VTE.

Clinical effects of pigtail catheter crushing thrombus combined with AngioJet mechanical aspiration in treatment of acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy of combined pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi in the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with acute iliofemoral DVT were retrospectively divided into a pigtail catheter + AngioJet group (group A, 42 cases) and an AngioJet-only group (group B, 40 cases). The difference in the circumference of the healthy limbs before and after treatment, immediate thrombus clearance rate in the lower limbs, recannalization percentage of venous lumen, and duration of postoperative hematuria were compared to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination method.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%, no serious bleeding complications occurred, lower extremity symptoms were effectively alleviated, and post-treatment recannalization percentage of venous lumen were similarly high in both groups. Group A fared significantly better than group B in immediate thrombus clearance (P < 0.05), intraoperative aspiration time (199.38 ± 68.55 vs. 295.30 ± 76.02 s), postoperative CDT urokinase dosage (2.10 ± 0.94 vs. 3.07 ± 0.94 million units), and duration of postoperative hematuria (13.23 ± 2.96 vs. 16.75 ± 3.11 h) (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, the recannalization percentage of venous lumen of group A and group B was 89.71 ± 16.02% and 88.64 ± 16.68%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi for acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis is safe, easy, and effective, with a satisfactory short-term outcome.

Comparison of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Measures of Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

We studied the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with either Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (hereafter "pharmacomechanical thrombolysis"; PT) or Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (CDT) for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

This retrospective study of data archived between September 2013 and September 2015 was surveyed. Two separate patient populations were identified and analyzed: patients were separated into PT group or CDT group. For up to 5 years post-treatment, the incidence, severity of PTS, and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score difference were compared.

RESULTS

The study identified 131 patients divided into PT group (65) and CDT group (66). Within the 5-year follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PTS (45.0% PT vs. 57.6% CDT; odds ratio (OR) = 0.602; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.291-1.242; P = 0.201), but there was reduced severe PTS in the PT group (Villalta scale ≥15 or ulcer:11.7% PT vs. 27.1% CDT; OR 0.355; 95%CI 0.134-0.941, P = 0.039; and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) ≥8: 13.3%PT vs. 28.8% CDT; OR 0.380; 95% CI 0.149-0.967, P = 0.045). There was also a larger improvement of venous disease-specific quality of life (QOL) in the PT group at 5 years [(62.89 ± 14.19) vs (56.39 ±15.62), P = 0.036] compared to the CDT group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute iliofemoral DVT treated with PT, PT significantly reduced PTS severity scores, and resulted in greater improvement in venous disease-specific QOL. However, the incidence of was not significantly different from that measured in the CDT.

AngioJet Thrombectomy Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Early catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT) can reduce post-thrombotic morbidity and the AngioJet thrombectomy is a new therapy that can be selected for the treatment of LEDVT. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing AngioJet versus CDT to assess the efficacy and safety of AngioJet thrombectomy. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for clinical trials that published before November 1, 2020 and compared AngioJet thrombectomy and CDT in the treatment of LEDVT. We meta-analyzed effective rate of treatment, serious complications, PTS, Villalta score, duration of treatment and drug dose. AngioJet does not result in a significant difference in the effective rate (OR 1.00, CI 0.73-1.36, P = 0.98; I² = 0%) and complications (OR 1.16 CI 0.84-1.61, P = 0.36; I² = 39%) compare to CDT. And there was a statistically significant decrease in incidence of PTS (OR 0.58 CI 0.37-0.91, P = 0.02; I² = 0%) and Villalta score (OR −1.86 CI −3.49 to −0.24, P = 0.02; I² = 34%) for AngioJet compared to CDT. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in duration of the treatment (OR −2.45 CI −2.75 to −2.15, P < 0.0001; I² = 95%) and drug dose (OR −3.15 CI −3.38 to −2.93, P < 0.0001; I² = 98%) between AngioJet and CDT. AngioJet results in a low severity of PTS compared to CDT therapy. Moreover, the average duration of treatment and thrombolysis time was shorter in the AngioJet group compared to the CDT group. However, the AngioJet group was not significantly different in effective rate of treatment and serious complications compared to the CDT group.

A predictive model for postthrombotic syndrome in proximal deep vein thrombosis patients

Background

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is the most common long-term complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Predictive models for PTS after hospitalized DVT patients, especially those with proximal DVT for whom preventative intervention decisions need to be made, are rare. We aimed to develop and externally validate a clinical predictive model for PTS in patients with proximal DVT.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, single-center, case-control study. The data used in our model were retrospectively collected from a prospective registry database in which 210 (derivation) and 90 (validation) consecutive patients were first diagnosed with proximal DVT. We developed a nomogram using the multivariate logistic regression model. External validation of our predictive model and previous predictive models in our validation set was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.

Results

Of the 30 candidate predictors, 5 were significantly associated with PTS in our final multivariable model, including the number of signs and symptoms (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.53, P<0.001), male sex (OR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.07 to 3.06, P=0.028), varicose vein history (OR 3.02, 95% CI: 1.04 to 7.60, P<0.001), BMI (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.12, P=0.052), and chronic DVT (OR 2.66, 95% CI: 1.49 to 4.79, P<0.001). The area under the curve was 0.724 in our predictive model, indicating suitable external performance.

Conclusions

A simple-to-use nomogram effectively predicts the risk of PTS in patients with proximal DVT. This predictive model may be considered for use in clinical care.

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy and stenting in a case of central vein thrombosis

Central vein stenosis and thrombosis are frequent in patients on haemodialysis for end-stage renal disease. Its management includes anticoagulation, systemic or catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Use of mechanical thrombectomy in central vein thrombosis has been scarcely reported. We hereby report a case of right brachiocephalic vein thrombosis with underlying stenosis, which was successfully treated by mechanical thrombectomy followed by PTA and stenting. The patient had a favourable 10 months of follow-up.

Clinical efficacy of one-stage thrombus removal via contralateral femoral and ipsilateral tibial venous access for pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in entire-limb acute deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we compared the early results between different approaches for pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) in the treatment of entire-limb acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

The present retrospective cohort study included patients with entire-limb acute DVT who had undergone PMT from January 2016 to March 2019 at two independent vascular centers. At the first center (Renji Hospital), the vascular surgeons used contralateral femoral venous access or ipsilateral tibial venous access (CFVA/ITVA). All consecutive patients with entire-limb acute DVT had undergone PMT through CFVA/ITVA at the first center. At the second center (Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital), the vascular surgeons had conducted PMT using the traditional approach via ipsilateral popliteal venous access (IPVA). All consecutive patients had undergone PMT through IPVA at the second center. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The secondary endpoints included thrombus removal grade, venous primary patency rate, and the incidence of moderate-to-severe PTS.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were enrolled in the present study, including 37 patients with CFVA/ITVA at the first center and 36 patients with IPVA at the second center. No significant difference was detected between the two groups in age, gender, onset time, affected limb, or risk factors. The proportion of patients who had undergone catheter-directed thrombolysis was significantly lower in the CFVA/ITVA group than in the IPVA group (P = .010). Thrombus removal grade III was achieved more often in the CFVA/ITVA group than in the IPVA group (P = .007). The PTS incidence was significantly lower in the CFVA/ITVA group than in the IPVA group (P = .043). The thrombus removal grade and access type were independent factors associated with the development of PTS. Patients with complete thrombus removal (grade III) and CFVA/ITVA had a significantly lower incidence of PTS.

CONCLUSIONS

PMT can increase the thrombus clearance rate, reduce the requirement for subsequent catheter-directed thrombolysis, and, potentially, decrease the incidence of PTS using CFVA/ITVA instead of traditional IPVA in the treatment of entire-limb acute DVT.

A new treatment paradigm for phlegmasia cerulea dolen: Single stage endovascular pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with venoplasty and stenting

BACKGROUND

Phlegmasia Cerulae Dolen (PCD) is potentially a lethal disease but there is currently no established treatment algorithm for it. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of single stage endovascular pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with venoplasty and stenting in the treatment of PCD.

METHOD

This was a retrospective single centre observational study of consecutive patients who underwent endovascular intervention for the treatment of PCD between June 2016 and March 2020. Clinical and procedural details were recorded. Procedural and clinical success rate, procedural complications, and 30 days mortality were reported.

RESULT

11 patients were treated during the study period. 2 (18.2%) had active malignancy. 63.6% were uncomplicated PCD on presentation. Common iliac vein compression or stenosis were demonstrated in all patients. Venous stents were implanted in all cases and procedures were successful in all cases. All patients had symptoms improvement at 72 hours post procedure. Other than 2 major bleeding complications, there was no other adverse event. The 30 days mortality was 18.2%. Active malignancy and the presence of anaemia were significantly associated with major complications.

CONCLUSION

Single stage endovascular thrombectomy and stenting was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with PCD. Common Iliac vein compression was a common underlying cause of PCD.

Downregulation of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein underlies a novel inhibitory role of microRNA-136-5p in acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) comprises a critical and common health condition with high incidence, mortality, and long-term adverse sequelae. Several differentially expressed microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising prognostic markers in DVT. The present study intended to explore the functional relevance of miR-136-5p in acute lower extremity DVT (LEDVT). Rat models of acute LEDVT were established and miR-136-5p expression was altered by agomir or antagomir to assess its effects. In addition, in vitro gain- and loss-experiments, prior to exposure to CoCl₂, were performed to investigate effects of miR-136-5p on human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) apoptosis and levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP). miR-136-5p was downregulated, whereas IL-6 and CRP were elevated in acute LEDVT patients. Notably, miR-136-5p was confirmed to target both IL-6 and CRP. Overexpression of miR-136-5p led to reduced length, weight, and ratio of weight to length of the venous thrombus. Furthermore, overexpressed miR-136-5p downregulated the expression of IL-6 and CRP, consequently inhibiting HUVEC apoptosis. Conjointly, our data indicate that the overexpression of miR-136-5p has the potential to bind to the 3’-UTR in the mRNAs for IL-6 and CRP and mitigate acute LEDVT, which provides a basis for new therapeutic targets in acute LEDVT treatment.

Risk factors for acute kidney injury after pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) is an established treatment for selected patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Despite significant clinical success, hemolysis can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) with unknown longer term implications. Our aim was to characterize the rate of AKI after PMT and identify those patients at the greatest risk.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review of patients with acute DVT who had undergone PMT in our institution from 2007 to 2018 was performed. The baseline demographics, comorbidities, preoperative clinical characteristics, procedural details, postoperative hospital course, and follow-up data were reviewed. The primary outcome was postoperative AKI (≥1.5 times preoperative creatinine), and longer term renal impairment. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify associated factors.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients (mean age, 47 ± 16.6 years; 49.6% male) who had undergone PMT for treatment of acute DVT were identified (85.4% AngioJet system; Boston Scientific Corp, Marlborough, Mass). Of the 137 patients, 30 (21.9%) had developed AKI in the periprocedural period, 1 of whom had required hemodialysis in the perioperative period. The patients who had developed AKI had had significantly greater rates of preoperative coronary artery disease (23.1% vs 4.7%; P = .002), diabetes mellitus (19.2% vs 6.6%; P = .045), dyslipidemia (42.3% vs 17.9%; P = .008), and hypertension (53.6% vs 29.3%; P = .018). No significant difference was found in preoperative creatinine (0.99 vs 0.92 mg/dL; P = .65) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR; 96.9 vs 91.8 mL/min; P = .52) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated bilateral DVT (odds ratio [OR], 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-12.86; P = .008), single-session PMT (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.02-9.11; P = .046), and female sex (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.01-8.04; P = .048) were significant predictors of AKI. Of the 30 patients, 10 had had normal renal function at discharge and 15 and 25 patients had had normal renal function at the first and subsequent clinical follow-up visits, respectively. The remaining five patients (3.6%) had progressed to moderate (GFR, <60 mL/min) or severe (GFR, <30 mL/min) renal insufficiency, with one requiring long-term hemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PMT for treatment of acute DVT conferred a risk of AKI that will progress to chronic renal failure in a small fraction of affected patients. Patients with bilateral extensive DVTs have a greater risk of AKI; thus, longer priming with a thrombolytic drip before PMT should be preferred for this population.