1
|
Huang ZM, Han X, Wang J, Gu L, Tang L, Wu SY, Di T, Hou YW, Lau WY, Jiang YQ, Huang JH. A Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study of Modified Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Low-Dose Chemotherapy with Blank Microspheres Plus Low-Dose Lenvatinib and Microwave Ablation in Patients with Large (≥7 cm) Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The TALEM Trial. Liver Cancer 2024; 13:438-450. [PMID: 39114763 PMCID: PMC11305670 DOI: 10.1159/000536518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction For patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the effectiveness of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) remains suboptimal. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of modified TACE using low-dose chemotherapy with blank microspheres (BMS-TACE) plus low-dose lenvatinib (LD-LEN) and microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with large unresectable HCC. Methods In this prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients with unresectable HCC exceeding the up-to-seven criteria, with maximum tumor diameter ≥7 cm, and without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases, received initial BMS-TACE (lipiodol, low-dose doxorubicin, and lobaplatin up to 30 mg each, and blank microspheres; subsequently modified and repeated in most patients) plus LD-LEN (4-8 mg/day) and MWA. The primary endpoint was downstaging rate (DSR); secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results From November 2019 to March 2022, 43 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Median largest tumor diameter was 11.2 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 7-25). Following BMS-TACE and LD-LEN, downstaging occurred in 37 (86.0%) patients, 32 of whom received MWA, and 8 of whom had a complete response (CR) without MWA. ORR was 93.0% (CR in 32 [74.4%] and partial response in 8 [18.6%] patients). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 57.5%, 25.9%, and 18.1%, respectively (median PFS, 14.7 months [95% CI: 8.1-19.5]). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 85.8%, 67.7%, and 61.6%, respectively (median OS, 36.4 months [95% CI: 26.8-not reached]). After BMS-TACE, a significant decline in CD11b+/CD33+/HLA-DR- myeloid-derived suppressor cells and early elevation in CXCR5+/CD8+ and CXCR5+/CD4+ T cells were observed (both p < 0.05). Conclusion BMS-TACE plus LD-LEN and MWA resulted in promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with large unresectable HCC exceeding the up-to-seven criteria with a maximum tumor diameter ≥7 cm and without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Mei Huang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Xue Han
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ling Gu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Lu Tang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Shao-Yong Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Tian Di
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ying-Wen Hou
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, PR China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yi-Quan Jiang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Jin-Hua Huang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou J, Sun H, Wang Z, Cong W, Zeng M, Zhou W, Bie P, Liu L, Wen T, Kuang M, Han G, Yan Z, Wang M, Liu R, Lu L, Ren Z, Zeng Z, Liang P, Liang C, Chen M, Yan F, Wang W, Hou J, Ji Y, Yun J, Bai X, Cai D, Chen W, Chen Y, Cheng W, Cheng S, Dai C, Guo W, Guo Y, Hua B, Huang X, Jia W, Li Q, Li T, Li X, Li Y, Li Y, Liang J, Ling C, Liu T, Liu X, Lu S, Lv G, Mao Y, Meng Z, Peng T, Ren W, Shi H, Shi G, Shi M, Song T, Tao K, Wang J, Wang K, Wang L, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Z, Xiang B, Xing B, Xu J, Yang J, Yang J, Yang Y, Yang Y, Ye S, Yin Z, Zeng Y, Zhang B, Zhang B, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Zhao Y, Zheng H, Zhou L, Zhu J, Zhu K, Liu R, Shi Y, Xiao Y, Zhang L, Yang C, Wu Z, Dai Z, Chen M, Cai J, Wang W, Cai X, Li Q, Shen F, Qin S, Teng G, Dong J, Fan J. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition). Liver Cancer 2023; 12:405-444. [PMID: 37901768 PMCID: PMC10601883 DOI: 10.1159/000530495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Primary liver cancer, of which around 75-85% is hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people. Summary Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer in China in June 2017, which were updated by the National Health Commission in December 2019, additional high-quality evidence has emerged from researchers worldwide regarding the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer, that requires the guidelines to be updated again. The new edition (2022 Edition) was written by more than 100 experts in the field of liver cancer in China, which not only reflects the real-world situation in China but also may reshape the nationwide diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. Key Messages The new guideline aims to encourage the implementation of evidence-based practice and improve the national average 5-year survival rate for patients with liver cancer, as proposed in the "Health China 2030 Blueprint."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zhou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huichuan Sun
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenming Cong
- Department of Pathology, The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiping Zhou
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Bie
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lianxin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Tianfu Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming Kuang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guohong Han
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhiping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Maoqiang Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruibao Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ligong Lu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenggang Ren
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changhong Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Chen
- Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, Chongqing, China
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenping Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinlin Hou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingping Yun
- Department of Pathology, Tumor Prevention and Treatment Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dingfang Cai
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixia Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongjun Chen
- Department of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenwu Cheng
- Department of Integrated Therapy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuqun Cheng
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaoliu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Spleenary Surgery, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wengzhi Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yabing Guo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baojin Hua
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowu Huang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Jia
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Qiu Li
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xun Li
- The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yaming Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changquan Ling
- Changhai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Shichun Lu
- Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA Medical School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guoyue Lv
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Yilei Mao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqiang Meng
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Weixin Ren
- Department of Interventional Radiology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Hongcheng Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoming Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tianqiang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kaishan Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kui Wang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiming Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bangde Xiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Baocai Xing
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Affiliated Hospital Cancer Center, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiamei Yang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianyong Yang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yefa Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunke Yang
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shenglong Ye
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenyu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yong Zeng
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bixiang Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Boheng Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shuijun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanqiao Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Liver Cancer Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongfu Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Honggang Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ledu Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiye Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kangshun Zhu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinghong Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongsheng Xiao
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chun Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhifeng Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi Dai
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Shen
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Gaojun Teng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (BTCH), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hao MZ, Hu YB, Chen QZ, Chen ZX, Lin HL. Efficacy and safety of computed tomography-guided microwave ablation with fine needle-assisted puncture positioning technique for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:1727-1738. [PMID: 36187402 PMCID: PMC9516651 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In microwave ablation (MWA), although computed tomography (CT) scanning can overcome gas interference, it cannot achieve real-time localization. Therefore, the puncture technique is more important in CT-guided ablation.
AIM To compare the fine needle-assisted puncture (FNP) positioning technique and the conventional puncture (CP) technique for the safety and efficacy of CT-guided MWA in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS This retrospective study included 124 patients with 166 tumor nodules from February 2018 and June 2021. Seventy patients received CT-guided MWA under the FNP technique (FNP group), and 54 patients received MWA under the CP technique (CP group). Intergroup comparisons were made regarding local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and complications. The influencing variables of LTP and RFS were analyzed through univariate and multivariate regressions.
RESULTS The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidences of LTP in the FNP group were significantly lower than those in the CP group (7.4%, 12.7%, 21.3% vs 13.7%, 32.9%, 36.4%; P = 0.038). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS rates in the FNP group were significantly higher than those in the CP group (80.6%, 73.3%, 64.0% vs 83.3%, 39.4%, and 32.5%, respectively; P = 0.008). The FNP technique independently predicted LTP and RFS. Minor complications in the FNP group were lower than those in the CP group (P < 0.001). The difference in median OS was insignificant between the FNP and CP groups (P = 0.229).
CONCLUSION The FNP technique used in CT-guided MWA may improve outcomes in terms of LTP, RFS, and procedure-related complications for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhi Hao
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
- Department of Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yu-Bin Hu
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qi-Zhong Chen
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zhang-Xian Chen
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Hai-Lan Lin
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Image-guided locoregional non-intravascular interventional treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status. J Interv Med 2021; 4:1-7. [PMID: 34805939 PMCID: PMC8562266 DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2020.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most deadly and frequent cancers worldwide, although great advancement in the treatment of this malignancy have been made within the past few decades. It continues to be a major health issue due to an increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. The majority of patients have their HCC diagnosed at an intermediate or advanced stage in theUSA or China. Curative therapy such as surgical resection or liver transplantation is not considered anoption of treatment at these stages. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), the most widely used locoregional therapeutic approach, used to be the mainstay of treatment for cases with unresectable cancer entities. However, for those patients with hypovascular tumors or impaired liver function reserve, TACE is a suboptimal treatment option. For example, embolization does not result in complete coverage of a hypovascular tumor, and may rather promotes postoperative tumor recurrence, or leave residual tumor, in these TACE-resistance patients. In addition, TACE carries a higher risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with poor liver function or reserve. Non-vascular interventional locoregional therapies for HCC include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT), cryosurgical ablation (CSA), irreversible Electroporation (IRE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and brachytherapy. Recent advancements in these techniques have significantly improved the treatment efficacy of HCC and expanded the population of patients who qualify for treatment. This review embraces the current status of imaging-guided locoregional non-intravascular interventional treatments for HCCs, with a primary focus on the clinical evaluation and assessment of the efficacy of combined therapies using these interventional techniques.
Collapse
|
5
|
Luo L, He X, Li K, Long Y, Zeng Q, Tan L, Zheng R, Xu E. Thermal ablation of medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas using intraoperative ultrasound fusion imaging: A propensity score-matched analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2021; 45:101581. [PMID: 33761441 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the value of ultrasound fusion imaging for the thermal ablation of medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 2010 to June 2018, patients with medium-sized (3.1-5.0cm) HCCs who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) with the assistance of ultrasound fusion imaging were enrolled in this retrospective study. Technical efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), overall survival (OS), tumor-free survival (TFS) and major complications were evaluated during the follow-up period. The therapeutic outcomes were compared between the RFA/MWA combined with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) group and the RFA/MWA alone group with propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS A total of 112 patients with 115 medium-sized HCCs were finally enrolled in this study. The median duration of follow-up was 33 months (range, 2-104 months). The technique efficacy was 100% (115/115). The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS rates and TFS rates were 95.5%, 76.7%, 71.5% and 74.1%, 48.7%, 41.8%, respectively. The corresponding LTP rates and IDR rates were 5.4%, 7.3%, 7.3% and 21.8%, 46.9%, 50.3%, respectively. The incidence of major complications was 5.4% (6/112). After PSM analysis (19 patients in each group), the therapeutic outcomes, including the OS, TFS, and LTP rates, were comparable in the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS With the assistance of ultrasound fusion imaging, thermal ablation of medium-sized HCC could achieve a satisfactory local control rate and long-term survival. The outcomes were comparable in the stratified analysis between the RFA/MWA alone group and the RFA/MWA+TACE group after PSM analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Luo
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China
| | - Xuqi He
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China
| | - Yinglin Long
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China
| | - Qingjing Zeng
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China
| | - Lei Tan
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China
| | - Rongqin Zheng
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China.
| | - Erjiao Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonic, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou 510630, PR China; Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 3025, Shennanzhong Road, Shenzhen, 518033, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zaitoun MMA, Elsayed SB, Zaitoun NA, Soliman RK, Elmokadem AH, Farag AA, Amer M, Hendi AM, Mahmoud NEM, Salah El Deen D, Alsowey AM, Shahin S, Basha MAA. Combined therapy with conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma >3-<5 cm. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 38:248-256. [PMID: 33615957 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1887941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare safety and efficacy of combined therapy with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE)+microwave ablation (MWA) versus only TACE or MWA for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >3-<5 cm. METHODS This randomized controlled trial (NCT04721470) screened 278 patients with HCC >3-<5 cm. Patients were randomized into three groups: 90 underwent TACE (Group 1); 95 underwent MWA (Group 2); and 93 underwent combined therapy (Group 3). Patients were followed-up with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Images were evaluated and compared for treatment response and adverse events based on modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumor. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration was measured at baseline and during every follow-up visit. RESULTS Final analysis included 265 patients (154 men, 111 women; mean age = 54.5 ± 11.8 years; range = 38-76 years). Complete response was achieved by 86.5% of patients who received combined therapy compared with 54.8% with only TACE and 56.5% with only MWA (p = 0.0002). The recurrence rate after 12 months was significantly lower in Group 3 (22.47%) than Groups 1 (60.7%) and 2 (51.1%) (p = 0.0001). The overall survival rate (three years after therapy) was significantly higher in Group 3 (69.6%) than Groups 1 (54.7%) and 2 (54.3%) (p = 0.02). The mean progression-free survival was significantly higher in Group 3 than groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). A decrease in AFP concentration was seen in 75%, 63%, and 48% patients of Group 3, 2, and 1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Combined therapy with cTACE + MWA is safe, well-tolerated, and more effective than TACE or MWA alone for treatment of HCC >3-<5 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed M A Zaitoun
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.,Diagnostic Radiology Department, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed B Elsayed
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Nahla A Zaitoun
- Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Radwa K Soliman
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Ali H Elmokadem
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Alaa A Farag
- Internal medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Amer
- Internal medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Ali M Hendi
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nader E M Mahmoud
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Dalia Salah El Deen
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Ahmed M Alsowey
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Shahenda Shahin
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou J, Sun H, Wang Z, Cong W, Wang J, Zeng M, Zhou W, Bie P, Liu L, Wen T, Han G, Wang M, Liu R, Lu L, Ren Z, Chen M, Zeng Z, Liang P, Liang C, Chen M, Yan F, Wang W, Ji Y, Yun J, Cai D, Chen Y, Cheng W, Cheng S, Dai C, Guo W, Hua B, Huang X, Jia W, Li Y, Li Y, Liang J, Liu T, Lv G, Mao Y, Peng T, Ren W, Shi H, Shi G, Tao K, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Z, Xiang B, Xing B, Xu J, Yang J, Yang J, Yang Y, Yang Y, Ye S, Yin Z, Zhang B, Zhang B, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Zheng H, Zhu J, Zhu K, Liu R, Shi Y, Xiao Y, Dai Z, Teng G, Cai J, Wang W, Cai X, Li Q, Shen F, Qin S, Dong J, Fan J. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2019 Edition). Liver Cancer 2020; 9:682-720. [PMID: 33442540 PMCID: PMC7768108 DOI: 10.1159/000509424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 435] [Impact Index Per Article: 108.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary liver cancer, around 90% are hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people. SUMMARY Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2017 Edition) in 2018, additional high-quality evidence has emerged with relevance to the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer in and outside China that requires the guidelines to be updated. The new edition (2019 Edition) was written by more than 70 experts in the field of liver cancer in China. They reflect the real-world situation in China regarding diagnosing and treating liver cancer in recent years. KEY MESSAGES Most importantly, the new guidelines were endorsed and promulgated by the Bureau of Medical Administration of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China in December 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zhou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huichuan Sun
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenming Cong
- Department of Pathology, The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiping Zhou
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Bie
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lianxin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Tianfu Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guohong Han
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Maoqiang Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruibao Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ligong Lu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhengang Ren
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changhong Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Chen
- Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, Chongqing, China
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenping Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingping Yun
- Department of Pathology, Tumor Prevention and Treatment Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dingfang Cai
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongjun Chen
- Department of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenwu Cheng
- Department of Integrated Therapy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuqun Cheng
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaoliu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Spleenary Surgery, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wenzhi Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Baojin Hua
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowu Huang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Jia
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yaming Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoyue Lv
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Yilei Mao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Weixin Ren
- Department of Interventional Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Hongcheng Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoming Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kaishan Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiming Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bangde Xiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Baocai Xing
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Affiliated Hospital Cancer Center, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiamei Yang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianyong Yang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yefa Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery & Interventional Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunke Yang
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shenglong Ye
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhengyu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Hubing South Road, Xiamen, China
| | - Bixiang Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Boheng Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shuijun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yongfu Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Honggang Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiye Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kangshun Zhu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinghong Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongsheng Xiao
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi Dai
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gaojun Teng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Shen
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (BTCH), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang L, Ke Q, Lin N, Huang Q, Zeng Y, Liu J. The efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 36:1288-1296. [PMID: 31852267 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1692148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical value of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients and methods: Eligible studies were identified using PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, investigating the synergistic effect of TACE + MWA in the treatment of advanced HCC. Endpoints were the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates, local control rate (LCR), objective remission rate (ORR), and adverse event (AE). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size.Results: Nine studies including 351 patients in the TACE + MWA group and 653 patients in the TACE group were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were in favor of TACE + MWA (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 2.26-4.79; OR = 2.82, 95% CI 2.01-3.95; OR = 4.50, 95% CI 2.96-6.86; respectively). The pooled OR for the ORR and LCR were also in favor of TACE + MWA (OR = 4.64, 95%CI 3.11-6.91; OR = 3.93, 95% CI 2.64-5.87; respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of severe AE was observed between TACE + MWA group and TACE group (p > .05). However, subgroup analysis showed that patients with tumor size >5 cm were more likely to be benefited from TACE + MWA, rather than patients with tumor size ≤5 cm.Conclusion: With the current data, we concluded that combination TACE and MWA was safe, and should be strongly recommended to unresectable patients with tumor size >5 cm, but TACE alone was enough for unresectable patients with tumor size ≤5 cm. However, the conclusion needs further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
| | - Qiao Ke
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
| | - Nanping Lin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
| | - Qizhen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
| | - Yongyi Zeng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
| | - Jingfeng Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University.,Liver Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yamada R, Bassaco B, Bracewell S, Volin S, Collins H, Hannegan C, Guimarares M. Combined conventional transarterial chemoembolization with Mitomycin and percutaneous ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:298-303. [PMID: 32399271 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has been the standard treatment for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For early stage HCC, percutaneous ablation is a curative option. There is growing evidence to support combined therapy to improve tumor response and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable HCC. The goal of this study is to retrospectively review a single institution patient population who underwent the combined approach to determine its efficacy and safety, and possible predictive factors for OS and tumor response. Methods Retrospective analysis identified all patients that underwent c-TACE with Mitomycin followed by percutaneous ablation from 2011 to 2016 at our institution. Efficacy was assessed by OS, time to progression (TTP), and tumor response according to mRECIST criteria. Initial imaging was obtained 1 month after each treatment and after complete response was achieved, every 3 months for 2 years. Percentage of Lipiodol uptake was determined at 30-day follow-up with contrasted abdominal CT. Safety was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Multiple linear regressions were conducted to predict OS and number of progression-free survival days based on potential predictive factors. Results A total of 50 patients were identified. At 1-month follow-up, objective response (CR + PR) was achieved in 44 patients (88%). The median OS was 26.6 months and median TTP was 9.7 months (n=50). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between patients with different lesion size (P=0.95), BCLC stage (P=0.84) or Lipiodol uptake (P=0.36). Higher albumin/bilirubin ratio was significantly correlated with improved OS (P=0.024). Conclusions Combined c-TACE and PTA is a safe and effective approach for patients with unresectable HCC. Elevated albumin/bilirubin ratio was a predictor for improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Yamada
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Beatriz Bassaco
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Stephen Bracewell
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Samuel Volin
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Heather Collins
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Christopher Hannegan
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Marcelo Guimarares
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Herren JL, Disomma N, Ray CE. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization and Ablation. Semin Intervent Radiol 2019; 36:279-284. [PMID: 31435137 PMCID: PMC6699963 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Josi L. Herren
- Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nerina Disomma
- Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Charles E. Ray
- Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu M, Gao S, Song H, Zhang Z, Zheng Z, Yan Z, Wang X, Wang J, Liu L. Percutaneous microwave ablation combined with simultaneous transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases. J Interv Med 2019; 2:55-59. [PMID: 34805873 PMCID: PMC8562208 DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) combined with simultaneous transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic metastases (EHM). Methods Between August 2012 and April 2017, 101 patients with MVI/EHM of HCC underwent percutaneous MWA combined with simultaneous TACE at our center. The clinical data were collected and analyzed for survival and prognostic factors. Results The mean follow-up time was 23.6 ± 14.7 months. One patient had grade 3 complications, and the median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% confidence interval 9.7–14.3). Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh class, serum alpha-fetoprotein level, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were independent factors of survival. Conclusion Our results suggest that percutaneous MWA combined with simultaneous TACE is a safe and effective treatment for HCC with MVI/EHM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengfei Wu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shanshan Gao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Huadan Song
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zihan Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhiping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaolin Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Lingxiao Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Corresponding author. Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang T, Zhang XY, Lu X, Zhai B. Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Liver Surface: Technique Effectiveness and Long-Term Outcomes. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 18:1533033818824338. [PMID: 30803390 PMCID: PMC6378635 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818824338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: To evaluate long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of laparoscopic microwave ablation as a first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma located at the liver surface not feasible for percutaneous ablation. Methods: 51 consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic microwave ablation in our center between January 11, 2012, and July 31, 2014, were enrolled. Technique effectiveness (complete ablation or incomplete ablation) was evaluated 1 month postprocedure. Procedure-related complications were recorded. The influences of patients’ baseline characteristics on recurrence-free survival and overall survival were analyzed after a median follow-up of 34.0 (ranging 19.0-49.0) months. Results: Complete ablation was gained in 47 (92.2%) of the 51 patients. No patients died within 30 days of microwave ablation procedure. A total of 3 (5.9%) cases of complications were observed. Tumor progression/recurrence were observed in 40 patients (78.4%). The median recurrence-free survival and median overall survival of the total cohort was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval: 7.573-14.427) and 34.0 months (95% confidence interval: 27.244-40.756), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified alanine transaminase level and tumor number as independent significant prognosticators of recurrence-free survival whereas α-fetoprotein level as significant prognosticators of overall survival. Conclusions: As a first-line treatment, laparoscopic microwave ablation provides high technique effectiveness rate and is well tolerated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma located at liver surface. Alanine transaminase and tumor number were significant predictors of recurrence-free survival, whereas α-fetoprotein level was significant predictor of overall survival. Laparoscopic microwave ablation might serve as a rational treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with tumors at the liver surface, which merits validation in future perspective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Wang
- 1 Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Yu Zhang
- 2 Department of Gastroenterology, Huai'an Second People's Hospital and The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Xiaojie Lu
- 3 Department of Liver Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Bo Zhai
- 1 Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu B, Wu Z, Mo H, He J, Lin X, Guan J, Wei C, Yuan Z. Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation for breast cancer thoracic metastases. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:5685-5689. [PMID: 30532591 PMCID: PMC6241699 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s176743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for breast cancer thoracic metastasis. Materials and methods Twelve patients in our institution with a single lesion of breast cancer thoracic metastases received MWA and invasive spine surgery from August 2014 to November 2016. MWA was executed using the MWA system (2,450 MHz) at 40 W or 50 W with thermometers to control the ablation end points. The pathology of thoracic metastases was confirmed through intraoperative biopsy before ablation. The postoperative complications were recorded. The patients were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to monitor for tumor recurrence. Results The average duration of follow-up for breast cancer thoracic metastases patients (mean age 52.7±8.4 years) was 10.2 months. The rate of postoperative main complications was 8.3% (1/12). The recurrence rate was 16.6% (2/12) as confirmed by persistent enhancement. Conclusion MWA may be used as the adjuvant treatment for thoracic metastases of breast cancer. Results showed that few significant complications and less local recurrence occurred during the follow-up stage. Future research should aim at discovering more about the time controls for microwave-tissue interaction and treatment parameters before widespread use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Liu
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Hao Mo
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Juliang He
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Xiang Lin
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Jian Guan
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Changyuan Wei
- Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Zhenchao Yuan
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yuan H, Liu F, Li X, Guan Y, Wang M. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with simultaneous DynaCT-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Med 2018; 124:1-7. [PMID: 30132184 PMCID: PMC6339665 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0932-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To introduce the technique and investigate the clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with simultaneous DynaCT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of solitary large hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (maximal diameter > 5 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-six patients who received TACE combined with simultaneous DynaCT-guided RFA for solitary large HCCs between January 2012 and August 2016 were reviewed, and the success rate, safety, local tumor progression (LTP), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively investigated. OS and time to progression were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Technical success rate was 100%, average operative time for DynaCT-guided RFA was 45.3 ± 4.8 min, average radiation dose was 730.5 ± 78.8 mGy, and no life-threatening complications were observed. At 1-month follow-up enhanced MRI, complete remission was achieved in 82.6% of patients (38/46), and partial remission in 17.4% (8/46). The median follow-up period was 29.5 months (interquartile range 4.0-69.0 months). At 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery, the LTP rates were 4.3, 13.1, and 30.4%, respectively, and the OS rates were 89.1, 71.7, and 56.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION DynaCT-guided TACE + RFA is safe and feasible for the treatment of solitary large HCCS. TACE combined with simultaneous RFA provides a new treatment option for solitary large HCCs in which DynaCT has important clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongjun Yuan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengyong Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Guan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China
| | - Maoqiang Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hu H, Chen GF, Yuan W, Wang JH, Zhai B. Microwave ablation with chemoembolization for large hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 34:1351-1358. [PMID: 29720001 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1462536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and long-term outcomes of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in a single stage for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a maximum diameter of 5.0-10.0 cm. METHODS From January 2013 to December 2016, 84 consecutive HCC patients with cirrhosis from two medical centers who underwent MWA-TACE as a first-line treatment for up to three HCCs with maximum diameters of 5.0-10.0 cm were included. Feasibility, safety and effectiveness were evaluated. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors. RESULTS The technique was successfully performed in all the patients. Grade 3 complications consisted of two cases of hemoperitoneum requiring blood transfusions and embolization. The cumulative incidence of local tumor progression was 25.8% at 3 years, with tumor size found to be the only significant predictive factor (p = .007). The cumulative incidence of OS was 81%, 68% and 49% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. According to the Cox proportional hazards model analysis, serum AFP level, Child-Pugh class and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION MWA-TACE is a safe, feasible and effective therapy for the treatment of 5.0- to 10.0-cm HCC lesions in patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Hu
- a Department of Interventional Oncology , Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Guo Feng Chen
- b Department of Liver Surgery , The affiliated Huaian No.1 people's hospital of Nanjing Medical University ; Jiangsu , China
| | - Wei Yuan
- c Department of Interventional Radiology , Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University ; Shanghai , China
| | - Jian Hua Wang
- c Department of Interventional Radiology , Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University ; Shanghai , China
| | - Bo Zhai
- a Department of Interventional Oncology , Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zheng L, Li HL, Guo CY, Luo SX. Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas. Korean J Radiol 2018. [PMID: 29520181 PMCID: PMC5840052 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.2.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors associated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) versus TACE alone for a large solitary or multinodular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Materials and Methods This retrospective study involved 258 patients with a large solitary or multinodular HCCs (not more than 10 tumors) who underwent TACE + MWA (n = 92) or TACE alone (n = 166) between July 2011 and April 2015. Local tumor control, survival outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. Prognostic factors for time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The median duration of follow-up was 21.2 months (range, 4–45 months). The median TTP and OS were 12.5 months and 26.6 months, respectively, for the TACE + MWA group and 6.7 months and 17.1 months, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 85.9, 59.8, and 32.6%, respectively, for the TACE + MWA group and 59.0, 40.4, and 11.4%, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). The corresponding recurrence rates were 47.8, 78.3, and 94.6% for the TACE + MWA group, respectively, and 74.7, 96.4, and 97.6%, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses showed that the treatment method, tumor size, and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for TTP and OS. Conclusion TACE + MWA appears to have more advantages compared to TACE in prolonging OS, with a satisfactory TTP, for inpatients with solitary large or multinodular HCCs. Treatment method, tumor size, and tumor number are significant prognostic factors for TTP and OS. Further randomized, multi-center, prospective trials are required to confirm the findings of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zheng
- Department of Minimal-Invasive Intervention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Hai-Liang Li
- Department of Minimal-Invasive Intervention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Chen-Yang Guo
- Department of Minimal-Invasive Intervention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Su-Xia Luo
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yuan W, Yang MJ, Xu J, Yan ZP, Liu R, Qu XD, Wang JH, Qian S. Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Transarterial Chemoembolization for Specially Located Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2018; 17:1533033818788529. [PMID: 30045673 PMCID: PMC6071156 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818788529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation combined with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with specially located small hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between March 2014 and March 2017, a total of 26 patients with 26 lesions (10 perivascular, 6 subdiaphragmatic, 5 subcapsular, 5 perivascular, and subdiaphragmatic location; mean diameter 2.12 (0.62) cm), who received radiofrequency ablation-transarterial chemoembolization treatment, were retrospectively analyzed. Local tumor response was assessed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after the procedure. Tumor-free survival was also assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Complications were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). RESULTS Complete response was achieved in all patients 1 month after the procedure. During a median follow-up duration of 16.76 months (95% confidence interval: 7.78-25.73 months), local tumor recurrence occurred in 2 patients and new intrahepatic lesions developed in 7 patients. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative local tumor progression rates were 3.84%, 7.69%, and 7.69%, respectively. The median tumor-free survival duration was 21.96 months (95% confidence interval: 17.58-26.34 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year tumor-free survival rates were 67.4%, 46.1%, and 39.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION The radiofrequency ablation-transarterial chemoembolization combination therapy appears to be safe and effective and might be a treatment option for specially located small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions that have a risk of incomplete ablation or major complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Yuan
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Min-Jie Yang
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiang Xu
- 3 Department of Rehabilitation, Huai'an Second People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Zhi-Ping Yan
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Liu
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu-Dong Qu
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian-Hua Wang
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng Qian
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yuan BH, Li RH, Yuan WP, Yang T, Tong TJ, Peng NF, Li LQ, Zhong JH. Harms and benefits of adoptive immunotherapy for postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated review. Oncotarget 2017; 8:18537-18549. [PMID: 28061472 PMCID: PMC5392348 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The harms and benefits of adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) for patients with postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are controversial among studies. This study aims to update the current evidence on efficacy and safety of AIT for patients with HCC who have received curative therapy. Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating adjuvant AIT for patients with HCC after curative therapies. Recurrence and mortality were compared between patients with or without adjuvant AIT. Eight RCTs and two cohort studies involving 2,120 patients met the eligibility criteria and were meta-analyzed. Adjuvant AIT was associated with significantly lower recurrence rate than curative therapies alone at 1 year [risk ratio (RR) 0.64, 95%CI 0.49-0.82], 3 years (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.79-0.91) and 5 years (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.85-0.95). Similarly, adjuvant AIT was associated with significantly lower mortality at 1 year (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.52-0.79), 3 years (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.65-0.81) and 5 years (RR 0.86, 95%CI 0.79-0.94). Short-term outcomes were confirmed in sensitivity analyses based on RCTs or choice of a fixed- or random-effect meta-analysis model. None of the included patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Therefore, this update reinforces the evidence that adjuvant AIT after curative treatment for HCC lowers risk of recurrence and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao-Hong Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Yan'An Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, P.R. China
| | - Ru-Hong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Yan'An Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, P.R. China
| | - Wei-Ping Yuan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Tian Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Tie-Jun Tong
- Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
| | - Ning-Fu Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Le-Qun Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Jian-Hong Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lu M, Yao W, Zhang T, Fan W, Zhong Z, Li J, Zhang F. Feasibility and Efficacy of Microwave Ablation Combined with Iodine-125 Seed Implantation in Local Control of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas: Initial Clinical Experience. Oncologist 2017; 22:1500-1505. [PMID: 28701568 PMCID: PMC5728019 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical resection is the primary treatment option for retroperitoneal liposarcomas, but complete resection is difficult and postoperative recurrence and metastasis are common. This prospective study analyzed the feasibility and efficacy of microwave ablation combined with iodine‐125 seed implantation in the local control of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcomas. Introduction. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short‐term efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with iodine‐125 (125I) seed implantation in recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcomas (rRPLs). Materials and Methods. From September 2012 to March 2015, 11 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Eleven tumors (median, 9 cm; range, 5.5–12.5 cm) were treated with computerized tomography‐guided MWA for 11 sessions and 125I seed implantation for 18 sessions. 125I seed implantation was performed 4 weeks after MWA. Results. There were no procedure‐related deaths. Post‐MWA pain (grade ≥2) was the most common complication (6 of 11 patients, 54.5%), and fever (grade ≥2) was observed in two patients. Reversible nerve injury, defined as transient limb paresthesia or leg weakness, was observed in one patient. There were fewer complications associated with the 125I seed implantation procedure compared with the MWA procedure. All 11 patients who underwent the MWA procedure achieved a partial response (PR), according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 1 month post‐ablation; after 125I seed implantation was performed, a complete response was observed in three, five, and six target tumors in 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusion. In selected patients with rRPLs, MWA combined with 125I seed implantation is feasible and safe with favorable local control efficacy. Implications for Practice. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and short‐term efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with iodine‐125 (125I) seed implantation in recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcomas (rRPLs). Results suggest that a single session of MWA may be not sufficient in large‐volume rRPLs and that as a supplement treatment, 125I seed implantation is safe and easy accessible. MWA combined with 125I seed has excellent local control effectiveness, and long‐term efficacy and survival benefit still need to be more comprehensively evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingjian Lu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Wang Yao
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Medical Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Wenzhe Fan
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Zhihui Zhong
- Department of Medical Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Jiaping Li
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Fujun Zhang
- Department of Medical Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gaba RC, Lokken RP, Hickey RM, Lipnik AJ, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R, Brown DB, Walker TG, Silberzweig JE, Baerlocher MO, Echenique AM, Midia M, Mitchell JW, Padia SA, Ganguli S, Ward TJ, Weinstein JL, Nikolic B, Dariushnia SR. Quality Improvement Guidelines for Transarterial Chemoembolization and Embolization of Hepatic Malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28:1210-1223.e3. [PMID: 28669744 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ron C Gaba
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor Street, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612.
| | - R Peter Lokken
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor Street, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612
| | - Ryan M Hickey
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrew J Lipnik
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor Street, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel B Brown
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - T Gregory Walker
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Ana Maria Echenique
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Coral Gables, Florida
| | - Mehran Midia
- Interventional Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jason W Mitchell
- Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Siddharth A Padia
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Suvranu Ganguli
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Image Guided Cancer Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas J Ward
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida
| | - Jeffrey L Weinstein
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Boris Nikolic
- Department of Radiology, Stratton Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Sean R Dariushnia
- Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|