Portal Vein Embolization in the Setting of Staged Hepatectomy with Preservation of Segment IV ± I Only for Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases: Safety, Efficacy, and Clinical Outcomes

Is interval chemotherapy safe and does it improve the outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing multimodal two-stage hepatectomy? - A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Multimodal two-stage hepatectomy (mTSH) is used in patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) that cannot be treated with one surgical procedure due to insufficient future liver remnant. Interval chemotherapy has been proposed to improve disease control in CRLM patients undergoing mTSH. We here present a narrative review of clinical studies on mTSH including the use of interval chemotherapy in patients with CRLM.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed databases as well as the ClinicalTrials.gov registry was performed.

RESULTS

The use of interval chemotherapy during mTSH was reported in 23 studies and applied in 595 out of 1,461 patients with CRLM. Two studies report on the actual effects of this treatment, one study describes a trend towards improved disease progression rate. No serious adverse events caused by interval chemotherapy were observed. There is currently no randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of interval chemotherapy during mTSH.

CONCLUSION

The currently available data indicate that interval chemotherapy does neither impair liver hypertrophy during mTSH nor cause procedure-associated complications in patients with CRLM. Results from randomized clinical trials on the potential positive effect on disease control are not yet available.

Post-hepatectomy liver failure: A timeline centered review

BACKGROUND

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a leading cause of postoperative mortality after liver surgery. Due to its significant impact, it is imperative to understand the risk stratification and preventative strategies for PHLF. The main objective of this review is to highlight the role of these strategies in a timeline centered way around curative resection.

DATA SOURCES

This review includes studies on both humans and animals, where they addressed PHLF. A literature search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Web of Knowledge electronic databases for English language studies published between July 1997 and June 2020. Studies presented in other languages were equally considered. The quality of included publications was assessed using Downs and Black's checklist. The results were presented in qualitative summaries owing to the lack of studies qualifying for quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

This systematic review with 245 studies, provides insight into the current prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management options for PHLF. This review highlighted that liver volume manipulation is the most frequently studied preventive measure against PHLF in clinical practice, with modest improvement in the treatment strategies over the past decade.

CONCLUSIONS

Remnant liver volume manipulation is the most consistent preventive measure against PHLF.

Safety and efficacy of right portal vein embolization in patients with prior left lateral liver resection

BACKGROUND

In patients with bilobar metastatic liver disease, surgical clearance of both liver lobes may be achieved through multiple-stage liver resections. For patients with extensive disease, a major two-staged hepatectomy consisting of resection of liver segments II and III before right-sided portal vein embolization (PVE) and resection of segments V-VIII may be performed, leaving only segments IV ± I as the liver remnant.

PURPOSE

To describe the outcome following right-sided PVE after prior complete resection of liver segments II and III.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 15 patients (mean age = 60.4 ± 9.3 years) with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (n = 14) and uveal melanoma (n = 1) who were scheduled to undergo a major two-stage hepatectomy, were included. Total liver volume (TLV) and volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) were measured on pre- and postinterventional computed tomography (CT) scans, and standardized FLR volumes (ratio FLR/TLV) were calculated. Patient data were retrospectively analyzed regarding peri- and postinterventional complications, with special emphasis on liver function tests.

RESULTS

The mean standardized post-PVE FLR volume was 26.9% ± 6.4% and no patient developed hepatic insufficiency after the PVE. Based on FLR hypertrophy and liver function tests, all but one patient were considered eligible for the subsequent right-sided hepatectomy. However, due to local tumor progression, only 9/15 patients eventually proceeded to the second stage of surgery.  .

CONCLUSION

Right-sided PVE was safe and efficacious in this cohort of patients who had previously undergone a complete resection of liver segments II and III as part of a major staged hepatectomy pathway leaving only segments IV(±I) as the FLR. .

Is portal vein embolization safe and effective for patients with impaired liver function?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a safe and effective procedure used to increase the safety of extensive hepatectomy for selected patients. However, it is unknown whether PVE is safe for patients with impaired liver functional reserve.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PVE from April 2007 to September 2016 in our hospital were retrospectively assessed. According to indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15), we divided patients into Group A (≤10%), Group B (10%-20%), and Group C (>20%). We described and compared the treatment course and the outcome among the three groups.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were assessed and divided into groups A (n = 46), B (n = 49), and C (n = 11). The morbidity and mortality after PVE showed no significant differences among the three groups (A:B:C = 37%:53%:64%, p = .16; A:B:C = 0%:0%:0%, p = 1.00, respectively). The morbidity and mortality after successive hepatectomy also showed no significant differences among the three groups (A:B:C = 55%:71%:78%, p = .19; A:B:C = 0%:2%:0%, p = 1.00, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A patient with impaired liver functional reserve (ICG-R15 > 20%) can be a candidate for PVE and successive hepatectomy, as safely as a patient with normal and slightly impaired liver functional reserve (ICG-R15 ≤ 20%).

Portal vein embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue is superior to other materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

It remains uncertain which embolization material is best for portal vein embolization (PVE). We investigated the various materials for effectiveness in inducing future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, technical and growth success rates, and complication and resection rates.

METHODS

A systematic review from 1998 to 2019 on embolization materials for PVE was performed on Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane. FLR growth between the two most commonly used materials was compared in a random effects meta-analysis. In a separate analysis using local data (n = 52), n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) was compared with microparticles regarding costs, radiation dose, and procedure time.

RESULTS

In total, 2896 patients, 61.0 ± 4.0 years of age and 65% male, from 51 papers were included in the analysis. In 61% of the patients, either NBCA or microparticles were used for embolization. The remaining were treated with ethanol, gelfoam, or sclerosing agents. The FLR growth with NBCA was 49.1% ± 29.7 compared to 42.2% ± 40 with microparticles (p = 0.037). The growth success rate with NBCA vs microparticles was 95.3% vs 90.7% respectively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in major complications between NBCA and microparticles. In the local analysis, NBCA (n = 41) entailed shorter procedure time and reduced fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), lower radiation exposure (p < 0.01), and lower material costs (p < 0.0001) than microparticles (n = 11).

CONCLUSION

PVE with NBCA seems to be the best choice when combining growth of the FLR, procedure time, radiation exposure, and costs.

KEY POINTS

• The meta-analysis shows that n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) is superior to microparticles regarding hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, 49.1% ± 29.7 vs 42.2% ± 40.0 (p = 0.037). • There is no significant difference in major complication rates for portal vein embolization using NBCA, 4% (24/681), compared with microparticles, 5% (25/494) (p > 0.05). • Local data shows a shorter procedure time, 215 vs 348 mins from arrival to departure at the interventional radiology unit, and fluoroscopy time, 43 vs 96 mins (p < 0.001), lower radiation dosage, 573 vs 1287 Gycm² (p < 0.01), and costs, €816 vs €4233 (p < 0.0001) for NBCA compared to microparticles.

Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Increase in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Is Highest the First Week After Portal Vein Occlusion : FLR Increase in Patients with CRLM Is Highest the First Week After PVO

BACKGROUND

Portal vein occlusion (PVO) is an established method to increase the volume of the future liver remnant (FLR). The main reasons for not proceeding to radical hepatectomy are lack of volume increase and tumor progression due to a wait-time interval of up to 8 weeks. The hypothesis was that the increase in FLR volume is not linear and is largest during the first weeks.

METHODS

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) < 30% treated with PVO were prospectively included. All patients had at least one CT evaluation before radical hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included. During the first week after PVO, the kinetic growth rate (KGR) was 5.4 (± 4), compared to 1.5 (± 2) between the first and second CT (p < 0.05). For patients reaching adequate FLR and therefore treated with radical hepatectomy, the KGR was 7 (± 4) the first week, compared to 4.3 (± 2) for patients who failed to reach a sufficient volume (p = 0.4). During the interval between the first and second CT, the KGR was 2.2 (± 2), respectively (± 0.1) (p = 0.017).

DISCUSSION

The increase in liver volume after PVO is largest during the first week. As KGR decreases over time, it is important to shorten the interval between PVO and the first volume evaluation; this may aid in decision-making and reduce unnecessary waiting time.

Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Liver metastasis (LM) is one of the major causes of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Approximately 60% of CRC patients develop LM during the course of their illness. About 85% of these patients have unresectable disease at the time of presentation. Surgical resection is currently the only curative treatment for patients with colorectal LM (CRLM). In recent years, with the help of modern multimodality therapy including systemic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery, the outcomes of CRLM treatment have significantly improved. This article summarizes the current status of surgical treatment of CRLM including evaluation of resectability, treatment for resectable LM, conversion therapy and liver transplantation for unresectable cases, liver resection for recurrent CRLM and elderly patients, and surgery for concomitant hepatic and extra-hepatic metastatic disease (EHMD). We believe that with the help of modern multimodality therapy, an aggressive oncosurgical approach should be implemented as it has the possibility of achieving a cure, even when EHMD is present in patients with CRLM.

Hepatectomy increases metastatic graft and growth in an immunocompetent murine model of peritoneal metastases

BACKGROUND

Curative surgery of synchronous peritoneal metastases (PM) and colorectal liver metastases (LM) has been recently investigated as feasible option. When synchronous peritoneal and liver resection is not achievable, the sequence of the surgery remains unknown. Our hypothesis was that liver resection (LR) promotes peritoneal growth resulting in a non-resectable PM. We sought to analyse the effects of major LR and liver regeneration after hepatectomy in a murine model of PM and the associated angiogenesis.

METHODS

Murine model of colorectal PM in Balb/C mice was developed by intraperitoneal injection of different CT-26 tumour cell concentrations. Five days after the injection, mice were randomized into three groups: 68% hepatectomy group, sham laparotomy and control group without surgery. On post-operative days 1, 5 and 20, PM was evaluated macroscopically, tumour growth and liver regeneration by immunohistochemistry, and angiogenesis by immunofluorescence. Circulating progenitor cells, plasmatic cytokines and digestive arterial blood flow velocity measurements were also analysed.

RESULTS

Reproducible murine model of limited colorectal PM was obtained. Surgery induced PM increases and promoted neo-angiogenesis. Major hepatectomy influence the tumour growth in the late phase after surgery, the extent of extra-peritoneal metastasis and the increase of Ki-67 expression in the remnant liver.

CONCLUSIONS

This animal model confirms the pro-tumoural and pro-angiogenic role of surgery, laparotomy and major LR, which promotes the increase of angiogenic factors and their participation in PM growth. These results suggest that peritoneal resection should be first step in the case of two-step liver and peritoneal surgery for patients with colorectal PM and LM.