Acute Intramural Hematoma of the Descending Aorta Treated with Stent Graft Repair Is Associated with a Better Prognosis

Natural history and long-term outcomes of medically managed Type B intramural hematoma

OBJECTIVE

Type B intramural hematoma (IMH) is often managed medically, yet may progress to dissection, aneurysmal dilation, or rupture. The aim of this study was to report the natural history of medically managed Type B IMH, and factors associated with progression.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with medically managed Type B IMH between January 1995 to December 2022 at a single center. Any patients with immediate surgical or endovascular intervention were excluded. Demographic profiles, comorbidities, imaging, and follow-up details were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had isolated IMH, and Group 2 had IMH along with aneurysm or dissection at the time of presentation. On follow-up, progression was defined as degeneration to aneurysm/dissection or increase in the thickness of IMH in Group 1. In Group 2, progression was an increase in the size of aneurysm or development of new dissection.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients with Type B IMH during the study period, 92 were medically managed. The median age was 77 years, and 45 (48.9%) were females. Comorbidities included hypertension (83.7%), hypercholesterolemia (44.6%), and active smoking (47.8%). Mean Society for Vascular Surger comorbidity score was 6.3. Mean IMH thickness and aortic diameter at presentation were 8.9 mm and 38.3 mm, respectively. Median follow-up was 55 months. Overall survival at 1 year and 5 years was 85.8% and 61.9%, respectively. During follow-up, 19 patients (20.7%) required intervention, more common in Group 2 (Group 1, 8/66; 12.3% vs Group 2, 11/26; 42.3%; P = .001). This resulted in higher freedom from intervention in Group 1 at 1 year (93.5% vs 62.7%) and 5 years (87.5% vs 51.1%; P < .001). Indication for intervention was dissection (n = 4), aneurysm (n = 12), and progression of IMH (n = 3). In Group 1, progression was seen in 25 (37.9%), three (4.5%) remained stable, 29 (43.9%) had complete resolution of IMH, and nine patients were lost to follow-up. In Group 2, 11 patients (42.3%) had progression, seven (26.9%) remained stable, and eight were lost to follow-up. IMH thickness at presentation >7.2 mm is associated with both increased odds of progression (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.1; P = .03) and intervention (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-36.9; P = .03) during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many patients with Type B IMH managed medically stabilize or regress, progression or need for intervention can occur in up to 40% of cases. This is associated with the presence of aneurysm, dissection, and IMH thickness. Long-term follow-up is mandatory as late interventions occur, particularly for higher risk patients.

Five Year Results of Endovascular versus Medical Therapy in Acute Type B Aortic Intramural Haematoma: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time to Event Data

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes in the follow up of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs. medical therapy in patients with acute type B aortic intramural haematoma (IMH).

DATA SOURCES

The following sources were searched for articles meeting the inclusion criteria and published by July 2023: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR (Cochrane Controlled Trials Register).

REVIEW METHODS

This systematic review with pooled meta-analysis of time to event data followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, and its protocol was registered on the public platform PROSPERO (CRD42023456222). The following were analysed: overall survival (all cause mortality), aortic related mortality, and restricted mean survival time. Certainty of evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, including 1 015 patients (440 in the TEVAR group and 575 in the medical therapy group). All studies were observational, and the pooled cohort had a median follow up of 5.1 years. Compared with patients who received medical therapy alone, those who underwent TEVAR had a statistically significantly lower risk of all cause death (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 - 0.65; p < .001; GRADE certainty: low), lower risk of aortic related death (HR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.31; p = .002; GRADE certainty: low) and lifetime gain (restricted mean survival time was overall 201 days longer with TEVAR; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be associated with lower risk of all cause and aortic related death compared with medical therapy in patients with acute type B IMH; however, the underlying data are not strong enough to draw robust clinical conclusions. Randomised controlled trials with large sample sizes and longer follow up are warranted to elucidate this question.

Acute Type B Intramural Hematoma: Novel Insights in the Endovascular Era

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology and behavior of acute type B intramural hematoma (TBIMH) is poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to characterize the pathophysiology, fate, and outcomes of TBIMH in the endovascular era.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a US Aortic Database identified 70 patients with TBIMH from 2008 to 2022. Patients were divided into groups and analyzed based upon subsequent management: early thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR; Group 1) or hospital discharge on optimal medical therapy (OMT) (Group 2).

RESULTS

Of 70 total patients, 43% (30/70) underwent TEVAR (Group 1) and 57% (40/70) were discharged on OMT (Group 2). There were no significant differences in age, demographics, or comorbidities between groups. Indications for TEVAR in Group 1 were as follows: 1) Penetrating atheroscletoic ulcer (PAU) or ulcer-like projection (n = 26); 2) Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 3); or 3) Progression to type B aortic dissection (TBAD) (n = 2). Operative mortality was zero. No patient suffered a stroke or spinal cord ischemia. During the follow-up period, 50% (20/40) of Group 2 patients required delayed surgical intervention, including TEVAR in 14 patients and open repair in 6 patients. Indications for surgical intervention were as follows: 1) Development of a PAU / ulcer-like projection (n = 13); 2) Progression to TBAD (n = 3), or 3) Concomitant aneurysmal disease (n = 4). Twenty patients did not require surgical intervention. Of the initial cohort, 71% of patients required surgery, 9% progressed to TBAD, and 19% had regression or stability of TBIMH with OMT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common etiology of TBIMH is an intimal defect. Progression to TBAD and intramural hematoma regression without an intimal defect occurs in a small percentage of patients. An aggressive strategy with endovascular therapy and close surveillance for TBIMH results in excellent short-term and long-term outcomes.

The Role of Endovascular Repair Timing in Uncomplicated Acute Type B Intramural Hematoma Management

BACKGROUND

With favorable results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with uncomplicated acute type B intramural hematoma (uTBIMH), TEVAR is increasingly utilized in the management of patients with uTBIMH. However, optimal timing for intervention has not been decided. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of acute and delayed TEVAR in patients with uTBIMH.

METHODS

We included patients with uTBIMH who underwent TEVAR between October 2014 and December 2021. The participants were divided into the acute TEVAR (aTEVAR) and delayed TEVAR (dTEVAR) groups. We analyzed the total aortic diameter (TAD)/true lumen diameter (TLD) ratio on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and aortic-related adverse events and all-cause mortality (AREM).

RESULTS

We included 34 individuals with uTBIMH, among which 20 underwent aTEVAR and 14 underwent dTEVAR. We observed no significant differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. However, compared with the aTEVAR group, better aortic remodeling was achieved in the dTEVAR group before discharge (1.32 ± 0.11 vs. 1.21 ± 0.09, P = 0.005) and at the 1-year follow-up (1.18 ± 0.09 vs. 1.10 ± 0.04, P = 0.034). Although the 30-day and 1-year follow-up outcomes of AREM were not significantly different, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that AREM incidence in the dTEVAR group was significantly lower than that in the aTEVAR group (85.7% for dTEVAR vs. 65.0% for aTEVAR, log-rank P = 0.20). Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in the TAD/TLD ratio between the aTEVAR and dTEVAR groups in individuals without a focal intimal disruption (1.33 ± 0.11 vs. 1.17 ± 0.09, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

For individuals with uTBIMH, delaying TEVAR by >7 days improved aortic remodeling and lowered the incidence of early AREM. Additionally, the absence of focal intimal disruption on preoperative CTA supports delayed intervention.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair versus Optimal Medical Treatment in Patients with Type B Intramural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

We intended to study the effect of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and optimal medical treatment (OMT) on type B intramural hematoma (BIMH).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases that compared TEVAR and OMT in patients with BIMH. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The rate ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval were used to calculate the outcome. The primary endpoints were aortic-related death and regression/resolution. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, progression to dissection, and secondary intervention.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies were included in the analysis. TEVAR reduced aortic-related death (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.56, P = 0.002, I² = 24%) and promoted hematoma regression/resolution (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.05-2.10, P <0.05, I² = 71%) compared to OMT. Moreover, TEVAR was associated with a reduction in progression to dissection (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.81, P <0.02, I² = 39%) and secondary intervention (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.37, P <0.00001, I² = 38%) compared to OMT. However, all-cause death has no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.17-1.19, P = 0.11, I² = 58%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggested that TEVAR is an effective treatment for BIMH, which can delay the progression of intramural hematoma and promotes regression/resolution. More research about indications of TEVAR is still needed.

Comparison of population characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with type B aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Survival and aortic-related adverse events after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) and aortic dissection (AD) are controversial. We aimed to assess the preoperative characteristics and to evaluate TEVAR outcomes of acute type B IMH and AD.

METHODS

Between June 2002 and May 2021, 83 patients with acute type B IMH and 755 patients with acute type B AD underwent TEVAR at the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command. We retrospectively analyzed data from these patients, including clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

The patients with IMH were significantly older than the ones with AD (P < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus (P = 0.035) and ischemic cerebrovascular disease (P = 0.017) were more common in the IMH group than in the AD group. The results demonstrated a less long-term aortic-related death-free survival rate in the IMH group than the AD group for all the patients (P = 0.014) and the matched patients (P = 0.027). It also presents a lower long-term overall survival rate (P = 0.047) and aortic-related event-free rate (P = 0.048) in the IMH group than in the matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with AD patients, patients with IMH who underwent TEVAR had a worse long-term outcome of aortic-related survival in all and matched patients.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair and optimal medical treatment for acute type B penetrating aortic ulcer associated with intramural hematoma

To compare the safety and efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and optimal medical treatment (OMT) for type B penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) associated with intramural hematoma (IMH). From January 2015 to December 2018, 68 consecutive patients with acute type B PAU associated with IMH were enrolled in the study. TEVAR was performed following initially OMT in 30 patients (group A), and OMT was performed in 38 patients (group B). Primary outcome was aortic-related mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, aortic-related adverse events, and complete aortic remodeling. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of patients among the 2 groups except for the depth of PAU and the thickness of IMH. Patients in group B had a significant higher risk of aortic-related mortality (13.3% vs 0%, P = .045), as the same to aortic-related adverse events during follow-up. Compared to OMT, TEVAR contributed to the favorable aortic remodeling more significantly during the mid-term follow-up (85.7% vs 18.2%, P < .001). Comparing with optimal medical repair, TEVAR for patients with PAU associated with IMH could promote the favorable aortic remolding more significantly and result in lower aortic-related mortality during mid-term follow-up. It should be considered as the first-line therapeutic option when intervention is required.

Acute aortic syndromes: a review of what we know and future considerations

Acute aortic syndromes represent a spectrum of life-threatening aortic pathologies. Prompt diagnosis and proper management of these syndromes are important in reducing overall mortality and morbidity, which remains high. Acute aortic dissections represent most of these aortic wall pathologies, but intramural haematomas and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers have been increasingly diagnosed. Type A dissections require prompt surgical treatment, with endovascular options on the horizon. Type B dissections can be complicated or uncomplicated, and treatment is determined based on this designation. Complicated Type B dissections require prompt repair with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) becoming the preferred method. Uncomplicated Type B dissections require medical management, but early TEVAR in the subacute setting is becoming more prominent. Proper surveillance for an uncomplicated Type B dissection is crucial in detecting aortic degeneration and need for intervention. Intramural haematomas and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers are managed similarly to aortic dissections, but more research is needed to determine the proper management algorithms. Multi-disciplinary aortic programmes have been shown to improve patient outcomes and are necessary in optimizing long-term follow-up.

IMPACT OF THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR TIMING ON AORTIC REMODELING IN ACUTE TYPE B AORTIC INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly utilized in the management of acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (TBIMH). Optimal timing for intervention has not been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate TEVAR timing on post-operative aortic remodeling.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent TEVAR for TBIMH from January 2008 to September 2018. Imaging was reviewed pre- and postoperatively. Primary data points included true lumen diameter (TLD) and total aortic diameter (TAD) at the site of maximal pathology. Primary endpoint was aortic remodeling evidenced by a TAD/TLD ratio closest to 1.0. Secondary outcome was occurrence of aortic-related adverse events and mortality (AREM): aortic rupture, aortic-related death, progression to dissection or need for aortic re-intervention within 12 months. Patients undergoing emergent TEVAR (within 24 hours, 'eTEVAR') were compared to the remainder - delayed TEVAR ('dTEVAR').

RESULTS

We analyzed 71 patients that underwent TEVAR FOR TBIMH; 25 underwent emergent TEVAR and 46 patients underwent dTEVAR (median: 5.5 days, range: 2-120 days). There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities and patients did not differ in presenting IMH thickness (12.6±3.1 mm vs. 11.3±4.1 mm, p=0.186) nor presenting TAD/TLD ratio (1.535±0.471 vs. 1.525±0.397, p=0.928) for eTEVAR and dTEVAR groups, respectively. eTEVAR patients had larger average presenting maximal descending aortic (DTA) diameter (45.8±14.3 mm vs. 38.2±7.5 mm, p=0.018) and higher incidence of penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) on presenting CT angiography (52.0% vs 21.7%, p=0.033). Thirty day mortality was 2/25 (8.0%) for eTEVAR and 2/45 (4.4%) for dTEVAR (p=0.602). Postoperative aortic remodeling was more complete in the dTEVAR group (1.23±0.12 vs. 1.33±0.15, p=0.004). Case-control matching (controlling for presenting DTA diameter and PAU) on 30 patients still showed better aortic remodeling in the dTEVAR group (1.125±0.100 vs 1.348±0.42, p<0.001). The incidence of AREM was higher in the eTEVAR - 6/25 (24.0%) - group compared to the dTEVAR group - 2/46 (4.3%). At 12 months, freedom from AREM was higher in the dTEVAR group (95.7% vs. 76.0%, p=0.011). Postoperative TAD/TLD ratio was the best predictor for late aortic-related adverse events (AUROC=0.825, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

TEVAR for acute type B IMH within 24 hours of admission is associated with lower aortic remodeling and higher occurrence of late aortic related adverse events and mortality. Delaying TEVAR when clinically possible could improve aortic remodeling and aortic-related outcomes.

Outcomes of intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta and extending into the descending thoracic aorta

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment of intramural hematoma (IMH) involving the ascending aorta remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the results of the management of patients with acute IMH involving the ascending aorta and extending into the descending thoracic aorta, to compare outcomes of descending thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with that of medical therapy (MT), and to assess the risk factors associated with adverse aortic events.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients diagnosed with acute IMH involving the ascending aorta and extending into the descending thoracic aorta from January 2012 to December 2019. The primary end points during follow-up were aortic disease-related death and adverse aorta-related events that required surgical or endovascular treatment, such as aortic rupture, the progression of aortic disease, or endoleak.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 135 patients with acute IMH involving the ascending aorta and extending into the descending thoracic aorta, of whom 104 underwent descending TEVAR (group 1) and 31 were managed with MT (group 2). Freedom from adverse aorta-related events at 1, 3, and 5 years was significantly higher for patients who underwent descending TEVAR compared with those managed with MT (89.2%, 88.2%, and 84.0% vs 74.2%, 74.2%, and 74.2%, respectively; P = .026). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in the descending TEVAR group was 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, which was significantly higher than the survival of the MT group: 93.5%, 93.5%, and 81.9%, respectively (P = .002). On a univariate analysis among patients receiving MT, those who suffered adverse aorta-related events showed a higher prevalence of renal insufficiency (55.6% vs 9.1%; P = .003). In MT patients, multivariate analysis showed that renal insufficiency was the only independent risk factor associated with adverse aorta-related events (hazard ratio, 8.691; 95% confidence interval, 2.056-36.737; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our study, compared with MT, descending TEVAR might be the more favorable treatment for patients with IMH involving the ascending aorta and extending into the descending thoracic aorta. Patients with renal insufficiency are more likely to experience adverse aorta-related events, which implies the need for subsequent intervention or an increased risk of mortality. The risk factor would be helpful for clinical decision-making.

[Acute localized dissection of the descending thoracic aorta: A diagnostic trap]

Localized dissection of the descending thoracic aorta; class 3 of the classification proposed by the European Society of Cardiology; is a short and limited length dissection involving the descending thoracic aorta. It is a rare and unrecognized variant that poses a clinical and radiological diagnostic challenge. Indeed, it is manifested by an aspecific clinical profile represented by the acute aortic syndrome and characterized by a confused radiological aspect that entangled with the other differential diagnoses. We would like to emphasize the rarity of this uncommon pathology and the difficulty encountered in defining it based on a case treated in our department and a review of the literature.

Outcomes of uncomplicated Type B intramural hematoma patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarize the clinical presentations, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes of Type B intramural hematoma (IMHB) patients with and without Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Patients with uncomplicated IMHBs were included between January 2016 and January 2018 and divided into two groups according to whether or not they had DM. We also assessed the potential diagnostic value of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) level and the association of it with the disease progression of uncomplicated IMHB patients with and without DM.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included (DM group [n = 60] and non-DM group [n = 89]). Patients in the non-DM group underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair treatment more frequently (12% vs 2%, p = .028) and had a higher reintervention rate during the follow-up (9 in 81 patients, 11% vs. 2%, p = .043). There were significant differences between the two groups regarding the aorta-related mortality rate during the acute phase (9% vs. 0%, p = .042) and the all-cause mortality rate (22% vs. 7%, p = .011). Ulcer-like projection (ULP) development (during the acute phase; hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.79, p = .005), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.91-3.91, p = .003), and MMP-9 levels (HR, 15.77; 95% CI, 6.48-21.62, p < .001) were associated with an elevated risk for aorta-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

IMHBs with DM have a considerably better prognosis and serum MMP-9 level appear to be a potential biomarker to predict the disease progression. ULP development (during the acute phase) and CRP levels are also associated with an elevated risk for aorta-related mortality.

The evolution of treatments for uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma patients

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate whether uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma (IMHB) patients with known evolution predictors could benefit from more aggressive therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed in uncomplicated IMHB patients with evolution predictors between January 2001 and August 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to identify the specific factors associated with aorta-related mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 226 uncomplicated acute IMHB patients with evolution predictors were included. The conventional therapy group included 187 patients, and the other 39 patients received the more aggressive therapy. Aorta-related mortality in the first year was higher in the conventional therapy group than in the more aggressive therapy group (15% vs 2.5%, P = .035), and more patients died after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (13 of 27 patients, 48.1% vs 2.5%, P < .001). The more aggressive therapy group had a higher rate of hematoma resolution than the conventional therapy group (81.6% vs 62.2%, P = .024), a lower possibility of hematoma worsening (2.6% vs 17.0%, P = .021), and a lower reintervention rate (0% vs 11.9%, P = .028). Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher rate of focal intimal disruption (FID) development (hazard ratio [HR], 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-11.46, P = .010), and a higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.40, P < .001) were associated with increased aorta-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

More aggressive therapy for uncomplicated IMHB patients with evolution predictors during the acute phase may result in better clinical outcomes. A higher rate of FID development and a higher CRP level are associated with increased aorta-related mortality.

Is the Natural Anatomical Evolution of Type B Intramural Hematomas Reliable to Identify the Patients at Risk of Aneurysmal Progression?

BACKGROUND

The natural history of type B intramural hematomas is little-known. Aneurysmal progression or an aortic dissection occurs in 15 to 20% of the cases. The study of the natural anatomical evolution could help identify the patients at risk of unfavorable evolution.

METHODS

All the patients monitored for a type B intramural hematoma between 2009 and 2018 were included in this monocentric retrospective study. Computed tomography angiography centerline measurement of diameters was obtained in various points of aortic segmentation on day (D) 0 and at one month (M1). Aortic volumes (lumen, intramural hematoma, and total volume) were calculated. The circulating volume was calculated using the volume rendering method. The volume of the intramural hematoma was measured using a manual section-by-section segmentation tool, and the total volume was obtained by summing up the two preceding volumes. Two groups of patients were compared: group 1 (favorable anatomical evolution) and group 2 (unfavorable anatomical evolution).

RESULTS

Between January 2008 and August 2018, 25 patients were managed for a type B intramural hematoma in our center. After an average follow-up of 15.5 months (1-52), 13 patients (52%) presented a favorable evolution and 12 (48%) an unfavorable evolution. At M1, a significant increase of the luminal diameters (37 mm vs. 32 mm; P < 0.01) and a significant reduction in the longitudinal extension (19 mm vs. 26 mm; P < 0.01) were observed. The maximum aortic diameter evolved significantly between D0 and M1 in the unfavorable evolution group (49 mm vs. 44 mm, respectively; P = 0.038). Such a difference was not found in the favorable evolution group (37.4 vs. 37.1, respectively; P = 0.552). An overall significant reduction in the total aortic volume (166 cm³ vs. 219 cm³; P < 0.01), the circulating volume (124 cm³ vs. 145 cm³; P = 0,026), and the volume of the hematoma (42 cm³ vs. 39 cm³; P < 0.01) was observed. The circulating volume decreased significantly between D0 and M1 in the favorable evolution group (110 cm³ vs. 135 cm³; P = 0.05), whereas no difference was noted in the unfavorable group (142 cm³ vs, 157 cm³; P = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The progression of the maximum aortic diameter and of the circulating volume after one month of follow-up could be predictive factors of the poor long-term evolution of type B intramural hematomas.

Conservative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Type B Intramural Hematoma of the Aorta Not Always Is the Right Solution

The natural course of intramural hematoma (IMH) of the aorta remains unpredictable and despite an increasing amount of literature reports its treatment is still debatable. IMH typically is diagnosed by computed tomography that has permitted to identify specific images whose onset, in uncomplicated cases, appears to be associated to a dismal prognosis. We report on a case series of acute uncomplicated type B IMH in which early detection of such findings, given the expected poor prognosis associated to the aorta-related mortality, suggests the need to shift toward an aggressive endovascular aortic repair in this subset of patients.

Endovascular versus medical management of type B intramural hematoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Aortic intramural hematoma constitutes one of the three classifications of acute aortic syndrome (AAS). Type B intramural hematoma (IMH-B) is localized to the descending thoracic aorta and can be managed through medical, endovascular or surgical means. Data comparing contemporary management with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) versus traditional medical management (MM) is sparse and only moderate strength recommendations for TEVAR are provided in guidelines. This meta-analysis aimed to pool available data from comparative studies between TEVAR and MM and examine differences in outcomes.

Methods

Literature search of electronic medical databases was conducted to identify studies comparing TEVAR and MM for management of IMH-B. Data extraction from studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria was performed by two authors and meta-analysis using a random-effects model applied to pool baseline data and examine risk ratios (RR) for management outcomes.

Results

Of the initial 2,349 studies, nine studies were identified for analysis. There were 161 TEVAR patients and 166 who were medically managed. The mean age of the cohort was 62.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 55.8-68.7 years]. Patients with complicating features of IMH-B at presentation were more likely to appear in the TEVAR group, with more penetrating atheromatous ulcer (PAU) [risk difference (RD), 0.565, 95% CI: 0.240-0.889, P=0.001], ulcer-like projection (ULP) (RD 0.240, 95% CI: 0.965-0.384, P=0.001), and greater IMH size (mean difference, MD 5.47 mm, 95% CI: 0.320-10.6, P=0.037). There was no statistical difference between TEVAR and MM for the primary endpoints of aortic-related death (RR 0.535, 95% CI: 0.191-1.5, P=0.234) or IMH-B regression (RR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.859-1.81, P=0.246). Of the secondary endpoints, TEVAR had both significantly less dissection during follow-up (RR 0.295, 95% CI: 0.0881-0.989, P=0.048) and less rupture during follow-up (RR 0.206, 95% CI: 0.0462-0.921, P=0.039).

Conclusions

A small number of series comparing TEVAR and MM for management of IMH-B are available and random-effects meta-analysis did not reveal any statistically significant difference between treatments for aortic related death or IMH-B regression at a mean follow-up of 37 months. TEVAR was found to be associated with lower risk of dissection and lower risk of rupture during follow-up. Baseline data meta-analysis showed patients with complicating features of PAU, ULP, and larger IMH size were more likely to be managed with TEVAR.

Certain aortic geometries and hemodynamics are associated with FID development and impact the evolution of uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma during the acute phase

OBJECTIVES

It is difficult to predict the evolution of uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma (IMHB) with a focal intimal disruption (FID) in the acute phase. The aims of this study were to investigate the predictors of FIDs and summarize the risk factors for the evolution of uncomplicated IMHB in the acute phase.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with uncomplicated IMHB were included and were divided according to the development of an FID during the acute phase: the FID group (n = 32) and the no-FID group (n = 54). Geometric measurements and computed fluid dynamic calculations were based on a computed tomography scan performed on admission. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the predictors of FID development.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (37%) patients developed an FID. Patients with an FID had higher C-reactive protein levels (18.6 ± 2.3 vs 8.1 ± 0.2 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and white blood cell counts (10.3 ± 2.1 vs 7.5 ± 1.7 10⁹ /L, P < 0.001). The no-FID group had lower occurrences of disease progression (15% vs 64%, P < 0.001) and aorta-related mortality (6% vs 25%, P = 0.016). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated a significant risk for the occurrence of an FID with a larger maximum aortic diameter (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73, P = 0.020), thicker hematoma (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.40-3.48, P = 0.001), and higher oscillatory shear index (per 0.01 unit, OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.21-2.49, P = 0.003). The aorta-related mortality during the acute phase was 25% (n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain aortic conditions, including ta larger aortic diameter, thicker hematoma and higher oscillatory shear stress, are associated with the FID development and result in worse clinical outcomes.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair versus Best Medical Treatment for High-Risk Type B Intramural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

BACKGROUND

To date, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection is favorable, but TEVAR for type B intramural hematoma (IMH) remains uncertain. There are numerous clinical (e.g., refractory pain) and radiologic (e.g., IMH thickness) factors that are reported to be associated with IMH progression, challenging the treatment for high-risk type B IMH with high risk factors in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to perform a systematic review of clinical studies to investigate outcomes of TEVAR + best medical treatment (BMT) and BMT in the treatment of high-risk type B IMH.

METHODS

The online databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, Google Scholar, and Cochrane as well as some journals majoring in endovascular surgery and interventional therapy were searched on September 1, 2017. Observational studies that reported the effect of TEVAR and BMT on type B IMH were included. Two independent reviewers performed methodological assessment and data extraction. Random and fixed effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out.

RESULTS

In all 6 included studies, the total number of patients with type B IMH was 237 and 123 patients received TEVAR + BMT. There was a significantly higher IMH regression rate among patients undergoing TEVAR + BMT compared with BMT (odds ratios [OR] 10.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.43-29.4). There were a significantly lower IMH progress rate and aortic-related death rate among patients undergoing TEVAR + BMT compared with BMT (OR 0.239, 95% CI 0.075-0.758; OR 0.248, 95% CI 0.085-0.725). When the study of Ye K et al. was excluded, the results showed no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined data from the present study demonstrate that TEVAR + BMT results in significantly higher IMH regression rate, lower IMH progression, and lower aortic-related death rate compared with BMT in high-risk type B IMH patients.