Evaluation of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors on human primary macrophages using a luciferase-based single-cycle phenotypic assay

Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic COVID-19 is persistent and critical for survival

Understanding how antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 evolve during infection may provide important insight into therapeutic approaches and vaccination for COVID-19. Here we profile the antibody responses of 162 COVID-19 symptomatic patients in the COVID-BioB cohort followed longitudinally for up to eight months from symptom onset to find SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, as well as antibodies either recognizing SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens and nucleoprotein, or specific for S2 antigen of seasonal beta-coronaviruses and hemagglutinin of the H1N1 flu virus. The presence of neutralizing antibodies within the first weeks from symptoms onset correlates with time to a negative swab result (p = 0.002), while the lack of neutralizing capacity correlates with an increased risk of a fatal outcome (p = 0.008). Neutralizing antibody titers progressively drop after 5-8 weeks but are still detectable up to 8 months in the majority of recovered patients regardless of age or co-morbidities, with IgG to spike antigens providing the best correlate of neutralization. Antibody responses to seasonal coronaviruses are temporarily boosted, and parallel those to SARS-CoV-2 without dampening the specific response or worsening disease progression. Our results thus suggest compromised immune responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike to be a major trait of COVID-19 patients with critical conditions, and thereby inform on the planning of COVID-19 patient care and therapy prioritization.

Restricted 5'-end gap repair of HIV-1 integration due to limited cellular dNTP concentrations in human primary macrophages

HIV-1 proviral DNA integration into host chromosomal DNA is only partially completed by the viral integrase, leaving two single-stranded DNA gaps with 5'-end mismatched viral DNA flaps. It has been inferred that these gaps are repaired by the cellular DNA repair machinery. Here, we investigated the efficiency of gap repair at integration sites in different HIV-1 target cell types. First, we found that the general gap repair machinery in macrophages was attenuated compared with that in dividing CD4(+) T cells. In fact, the repair in macrophages was heavily reliant upon host DNA polymerase β (Pol β). Second, we tested whether the poor dNTP availability found in macrophages is responsible for the delayed HIV-1 proviral DNA integration in this cell type because the Km value of Pol β is much higher than the dNTP concentrations found in macrophages. Indeed, with the use of a modified quantitative AluI PCR assay, we demonstrated that the elevation of cellular dNTP concentrations accelerated DNA gap repair in macrophages at HIV-1 proviral DNA integration sites. Finally, we found that human monocytes, which are resistant to HIV-1 infection, exhibited severely restricted gap repair capacity due not only to the very low levels of dNTPs detected but also to the significantly reduced expression of Pol β. Taken together, these results suggest that the low dNTP concentrations found in macrophages and monocytes can restrict the repair steps necessary for HIV-1 integration.

Comparative antiviral activity of integrase inhibitors in human monocyte-derived macrophages and lymphocytes

The activity of raltegravir and 4 other integrase inhibitors (MK-2048, L870,810, IN2, and IN5) was investigated in primary human macrophages, PBMC and C8166-lymphocytic T cells, in order to determine their relative potency and efficacy in different cellular systems of HIV infection. Raltegravir showed better protective efficacy in all cell types; MK-2048, L870,810 and IN5 showed a potent anti-HIV-1 activity in macrophages, while in lymphocytes only MK-2048 and L870,810 showed an inhibitory effect comparable to raltegravir. IN2 was a poorly effective anti-HIV-1 compound in all cellular systems. All effective integrase inhibitors exhibited a potent antiviral activity against both X4 and R5 HIV-1 strains. In general, raltegravir, MK-2048, L870,810 and IN5 showed anti HIV activity similar or slightly higher in macrophages compared to PBMC and C8166 T cells: for MK-2048, the EC(50) was 0.4, 0.9, 11.5 nM in macrophages, in PBMCs and T cells, respectively; for L870,810, the EC(50) was 1.5, 14.3, and 10.6 nM, respectively; for IN5 the EC(50) was 0.5, 13.7, and 5.7 nM, respectively.

Single mutations in HIV integrase confer high-level resistance to raltegravir in primary human macrophages

CD4(+) T cells and macrophages are the primary target cells for HIV in vivo, and antiretroviral drugs can vary in their ability to inhibit the infection of these different cell types. Resistance pathways to the HIV integrase inhibitor raltegravir have previously been investigated in T cells. Primary raltegravir resistance mutations, most often at integrase amino acid position 148 or 155, afford some resistance to the drug. The acquisition of pathway-specific secondary mutations then provides higher-level resistance to viruses infecting T cells. We show here that during macrophage infection, the presence of a single primary raltegravir resistance mutation (Q148H, Q148R, N155H, or N155S) is sufficient to provide resistance to raltegravir comparable to that seen in viruses expressing both primary and secondary mutations in costimulated CD4(+) T cells. These data implicate macrophages as a potential in vivo reservoir that may facilitate the development of resistance to raltegravir. Notably, the newer integrase inhibitor MK-2048 effectively suppressed the infection of all raltegravir-resistant viruses in both T cells and macrophages, indicating that more recently developed integrase inhibitors are capable of inhibiting infection in both major HIV cellular reservoirs, even in patients harboring raltegravir-resistant viruses.

Integrase-defective lentiviral-vector-based vaccine: a new vector for induction of T cell immunity

INTRODUCTION

The development of new strategies for the induction of potent and broad immune responses is of high priority in the vaccine field. In this setting, integrase-defective lentiviral vectors (IDLV) represent a new and promising delivery system for immunization purposes.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we describe the development and application of IDLV for vaccination. IDLV are turning out to be a new class of vectors endowed with peculiar characteristics, setting them apart from the parental integration-competent lentiviral vectors. Recent data suggest that IDLV are able to induce strong antigen-specific immune responses in terms of quantity, persistence and quality of CD8(+) T cell response following a single immunization in mice.

EXPERT OPINION

IDLV are a recent acquisition in the field of genetic immunization, thus allowing for the opportunity of further upgrading, including increasing antigen expression and potency of immune response. Based on recent reports showing the potential of IDLV for immunization in mouse models, further development and validation of IDLV, including comparison with other vaccine protocols and use in non-human primate models, are warranted.