Evaluation of the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test v2.0 for HCV viral load monitoring using dried blood spot specimens

Current position of viral load versus hepatitis C core antigen testing

Quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (viral load) is the most widely used marker to diagnose and confirm active HCV infection. The HCV core antigen forms part of the internal structure of the virus and, like HCV RNA, its detection also indicates viral replication and presents certain advantages over viral load testing such as its lower cost, the greater stability of the target, the possibility of working with the same primary tube as that used for HCV serology, and the rapidity of obtaining results, since there is no need to work in batches, unlike the situation with most viral load platforms. Although the core antigen has lower analytical sensitivity than HCV RNA for the detection of low viremia levels, several studies and guidelines have already shown their utility in the identification of patients with active HCV infection. This article summarises current platforms for viral load determination, including point-of-care systems, and also reviews the indications attributed to this marker by the main HCV treatment guidelines. The article also reviews the characteristics of HCV core antigen, the available platforms for its determination, its correlation with viral load determination, and the indications for this marker in the distinct guidelines.

The performance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody point-of-care tests on oral fluid or whole blood and dried blood spot testing for HCV serology and viral load among individuals at higher risk for HCV in South Africa

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To enhance screening and diagnosis in those at-risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV), efficient and improved sampling and testing is required. We investigated the performance of point-of-care (POC) tests and dried blood spots (DBS) for HCV antibody and HCV RNA quantification in individuals at higher risk for HCV (people who use and inject drugs, sex workers and men who have sex with men) in seven South African cities.

METHODS

Samples were screened on the OraQuick HCV POC test (471 whole blood and 218 oral fluid); 218 whole blood and DBS paired samples were evaluated on the ARCHITECT HCV antibody (Abbott) and HCV viral load (COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan version 2) assays. For HCV RNA quantification, 107 dB were analyzed with and without normalization coefficients.

RESULTS

POC on either whole blood or oral fluid showed an overall sensitivity of 98.5% (95% CI 97.4-99.5), specificity of 98.2% (95% CI 98.8-100) and accuracy of 98.4% (95% CI 96.5-99.3). On the antibody immunoassay, DBS showed a sensitivity of 96.0% (95% CI 93.4-98.6), specificity of 97% (95% CI 94.8-99.3) and accuracy of 96.3% (95% CI 93.8-98.8). A strong correlation (R 2 = 0.90) between viral load measurements for DBS and plasma samples was observed. After normalization, DBS viral load results showed an improved bias from 0.5 to 0.16 log10 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

The POC test performed sufficiently well to be used for HCV screening in at-risk populations. DBS for diagnosis and quantification was accurate and should be considered as an alternative sample to test. POC and DBS can help scale up hepatitis services in the country, in light of our elimination goals.

Performance evaluation of the DAAN HCV assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA and its comparison with COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Quantitative Test, v2.0

Background

The Daan HCV RNA quantitative assay was a recently developed kit with high sensitivity for the detection of HCV RNA. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the Daan HCV RNA quantitative assay and compare it with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Quantitative Test, v2.0.

Method

WHO HCV RNA standard, NIBSC 06/102 standard, and CLSI EP documents were used to evaluate the precision, accuracy, linearity, anti‐interference ability, and cross‐reactivity of the Daan HCV RNA quantitative assay. Overall 198 clinical serum specimens were used to make comparison between the Daan HCV RNA quantitative assay and the Roche Cobas test.

Results

The within‐run precision (S_within), and total precision (S_total) for 6.11 log IU/mL, 4.22 log IU/mL, and 2.32 log IU/mL HCV RNA were 0.13 and 0.15, 0.07 and 0.09, and 0.11 and 0.10, respectively. The linear range was 20‐10⁸ IU/mL, and the limit of detection was 15 IU/mL. It did not display any interference with commonly encountered conditions and cross‐reactivity with some common virus. A good agreement was observed between the Daan HCV RNA quantitative assay and the Roche Cobas test.

Conclusion

The Daan HCV RNA quantitative assay has shown satisfactory performances and excellent agreement with COBAS HCV Quantitative Test on clinical specimens with lower cost, which provides an alternative choice for the diagnosis and monitoring of HCV infection in developing countries.

Evaluation of dried blood spots as a feasible alternative to plasma for the detection and quantification of hepatitis c virus in a tropical setting: A pilot study

Introduction

Confirmatory diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (HCV RNA detection) is essential before start of the therapy. HCV RNA detection is not available in many parts of India. Shipment of plasma from distant places to referral laboratories may affect HCV RNA titres. Dried blood spots (DBS) provide an easy alternative for transporting samples to centres where HCV RNA testing is done.

Aim

Evaluation of DBS as a feasible alternative to plasma for HCV diagnosis.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 40 consecutive patients' blood samples were collected from patients referred from the Liver Clinic. Whole blood was spotted onto two Whatman 903^TM cards. One card was incubated at ≥37°C and other at 4°C for 15 days, after drying. DBS was eluted and run in Abbott RealTime HCV assay. HCV was also quantified using the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV core antigen assay for 29 of the study patients. Results were compared with normal plasma values.

Results

The median log HCV RNA value (in log₁₀IU/mL) of plasma was 5.74, with normalised DBS it was 4.92 (≥37°C) and 4.66 (4°C); difference in plasma and DBS median log values was 0.82 (≥37°C) and 1.08 (4°C) logs, respectively. Interclass correlation values were 0.943, P < 0.0001 (≥37°C) and 0.950, P < 0.0001 (4°C), showing high agreement. The median HCV core antigen value (in fmol/L) for plasma was 325.35, whereas it was 4.77 (≥37°C) and 4.64 (4°C) for DBS samples.

Conclusions

DBS can be used for sampling patients from distant resource-limited settings as an alternative to plasma for HCV RNA estimation. Larger studies are required to evaluate the feasibility of DBS in the Indian subcontinent, especially for HCV core antigen estimation.

Evaluation of the Aptima HCV Quant Dx Assay Using Serum and Dried Blood Spots

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantitation is the primary method by which active HCV infections are identified and the response to direct-acting antiviral therapy is monitored. This study describes the evaluation of the Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay (Aptima HCV) performed on the Panther system. The clinical performance of Aptima HCV was compared to that of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test v2.0 (CAP/CTM). Overall agreement was 84.9% (186/219) with a kappa statistic of 0.755 (standard error, 0.037; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.682 to 0.828). Passing-Bablok regression of log₁₀ IU/ml values revealed a regression line of Y = 1.163 × X - 0.991 (95% CI of the slope, 1.103 to 1.221, and intercept, -1.341 to -0.642). The 95% lower limit of detection (LLOD) for Aptima HCV on dried blood spot (DBS) samples was calculated to be 2.43 log₁₀ IU/ml (267 IU/ml; 95% CI, 2.31 to 2.73 log₁₀ IU/ml [204 to 540 IU/ml]). A comparison of Aptima HCV testing on paired DBS and serum specimens collected from patients at the time of routine blood collection for CAP/CTM demonstrated an overall agreement of 90.1% (82/91) with a kappa statistic of 0.657 (standard error, 0.101; 95% CI, 0.458 to 0.855). In conclusion, Aptima HCV provides a suitable alternative for HCV RNA testing on serum and DBS samples.

Performance evaluation of the Hologic Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay for detection of HCV RNA from dried blood spots

BACKGROUND

The availability of effective direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has led to a need for simplified diagnostic pathways. Barriers to treatment uptake, specifically in people who inject drugs and in remote and resource limited settings, may be overcome by utilizing novel collection methods, such as dried blood spots (DBS). However, there are currently no registered assays for HCV RNA testing from DBS samples.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Aptima HCV Dx Quant assay for HCV RNA detection in DBS samples STUDY DESIGN: 107 paired venepuncture and DBS samples from HCV antibody positive individuals were analyzed for HCV RNA on the Aptima HCV Dx Quant and Roche CAP/CTM (gold standard) HCV assays.

RESULTS

78% (n=83) had detectable HCV RNA in plasma. Sensitivity of the Aptima assay for HCV RNA detection in DBS was 96.4% (95% CI 89.8-99.3%) and specificity was 95.8% (95% CI 78.8-99.9%). Sensitivity for HCV RNA detection in DBS using a quantitative threshold of ≥15 IU/mL in plasma was 95.1% (95% CI 88%-98.7%) and specificity was 96.0% (95% CI 79.7%-99.9%). The sensitivity of HCV RNA detection in DBS using a quantitative threshold of ≥1000 IU/mL (based on a clinically relevant threshold) was 100% (95% CI 95.3-100%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 88.4-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicates that the Aptima HCV Dx Quant can detect active HCV infection from a DBS sample with good sensitivity and specificity, particularly when using a threshold of ≥1000 IU/mL.

Diagnostic accuracy of detection and quantification of HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA using dried blood spot (DBS) samples - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B (HBV) DNA and hepatitis C (HCV) RNA in whole blood collected on dried blood spots (DBS) may facilitate access to diagnosis and treatment of HBV and HCV infection in resource-poor settings. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of DBS compared to venous blood samples for detection and quantification of HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA in two systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the diagnostic accuracy of HBV DNA and HCV RNA from DBS compared to venous blood samples.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, LILAC and Cochrane library for studies that assessed diagnostic accuracy with DBS. Heterogeneity was assessed and where appropriate pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated using bivariate analyses with maximum likelihood estimates and 95% confidence intervals. We also conducted a narrative review on the impact of varying storage conditions or different cut-offs for detection from studies that undertook this in a subset of samples. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

In the quantitative synthesis for diagnostic accuracy of HBV-DNA using DBS, 521 citations were identified, and 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall quality of studies was rated as low. The pooled estimate of sensitivity and specificity for HBV-DNA was 95% (95% CI: 83-99) and 99% (95% CI: 53-100), respectively. In the two studies that reported on cut-offs and limit of detection (LoD) - one reported a sensitivity of 98% for a cut-off of ≥2000 IU/ml and another reported a LoD of 914 IU/ml using a commercial assay. Varying storage conditions for individual samples did not result in a significant variation of results. In the synthesis for diagnostic accuracy of HCV-RNA using DBS, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, and this included six additional studies to a previously published review. The pooled sensitivity and specificity was 98% (95% CI:95-99) and 98% (95% CI:95-99.0), respectively. Varying storage conditions resulted in a decrease in accuracy for quantification but not for reported positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show a high level of diagnostic performance for the use of DBS for HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA detection. However, this was based on a limited number and quality of studies. There is a need for development of standardized protocols by manufacturers on the use of DBS with their assays, as well as for larger studies on use of DBS conducted in different settings and with varying storage conditions.