Construction of replication-competent oncolytic retroviral vectors expressing R peptide-truncated 10A1 envelope glycoprotein

Tutorial: design, production and testing of oncolytic viruses for cancer immunotherapy

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) represent a novel class of cancer immunotherapy agents that preferentially infect and kill cancer cells and promote protective antitumor immunity. Furthermore, OVs can be used in combination with established or upcoming immunotherapeutic agents, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, to efficiently target a wide range of malignancies. The development of OV-based therapy involves three major steps before clinical evaluation: design, production and preclinical testing. OVs can be designed as natural or engineered strains and subsequently selected for their ability to kill a broad spectrum of cancer cells rather than normal, healthy cells. OV selection is further influenced by multiple factors, such as the availability of a specific viral platform, cancer cell permissivity, the need for genetic engineering to render the virus non-pathogenic and/or more effective and logistical considerations around the use of OVs within the laboratory or clinical setting. Selected OVs are then produced and tested for their anticancer potential by using syngeneic, xenograft or humanized preclinical models wherein immunocompromised and immunocompetent setups are used to elucidate their direct oncolytic ability as well as indirect immunotherapeutic potential in vivo. Finally, OVs demonstrating the desired anticancer potential progress toward translation in patients with cancer. This tutorial provides guidelines for the design, production and preclinical testing of OVs, emphasizing considerations specific to OV technology that determine their clinical utility as cancer immunotherapy agents.

A Replication-Competent Retroviral Vector Expressing the HERV-W Envelope Glycoprotein is a Potential Tool for Cancer Gene Therapy

The fusogenic membrane glycoprotein (FMG) derived from the human endogenous retrovirus-W (HERV-W) exhibits fusogenic properties, making it a promising candidate for cancer gene therapy. When cells are transfected with HERV-W FMG, they can fuse with neighboring cells expressing the receptor, resulting in the formation of syncytia. These syncytia eventually undergo cell death within a few days. In addition, it has been observed that an HERV-W env mutant, which is truncated after amino acid 483, displays increased fusogenicity compared to the wild-type HERV-W env. In this study, we observed syncytium formation upon transfection of HeLa and TE671 human cancer cells with plasmids containing the HERV-W 483 gene. To explore the potential of a semi-replication-competent retroviral (s-RCR) vector encoding HERV-W 483 for FMG-mediated cancer gene therapy, we developed two replication-defective retroviral vectors: a gag-pol vector encoding HERV-W 483 (MoMLV-HERV-W 483) and an env vector encoding VSV-G (pCLXSN-VSV-G-EGFP). When MoMLV-HERV-W 483 and pCLXSN-VSV-G-EGFP were co-transfected into HEK293T cells to produce the s-RCR vector, gradual syncytium formation was observed. However, the titers of the s-RCR virus remained consistently low. To enhance gene transfer efficiency, we constructed an RCR vector encoding HERV-W 483 (MoMLV-10A1-HERV-W 483), which demonstrated replication ability in HEK293T cells. Infection of A549 and HT1080 human cancer cell lines with this RCR vector induced syncytium formation and subsequent cell death. Consequently, both the s-RCR vector and RCR encoding HERV-W 483 hold promise as valuable tools for cancer gene therapy.

Viruses as tools in gene therapy, vaccine development, and cancer treatment

Using viruses to our advantage has been a huge leap for humanity. Their ability to mediate horizontal gene transfer has made them useful tools for gene therapy, vaccine development, and cancer treatment. Adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, retroviruses, lentiviruses, alphaviruses, and herpesviruses are a few of the most common candidates for use as therapeutic agents or efficient gene delivery systems. Efforts are being made to improve and perfect viral-vector-based therapies to overcome potential or reported drawbacks. Some preclinical trials of viral vector vaccines have yielded positive results, indicating their potential as prophylactic or therapeutic vaccine candidates. Utilization of the oncolytic activity of viruses is the future of cancer therapy, as patients will then be free from the harmful effects of chemo- or radiotherapy. This review discusses in vitro and in vivo studies showing the brilliant therapeutic potential of viruses.

Construction of SARS-CoV-2 spike-pseudotyped retroviral vector inducing syncytia formation

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is handled in biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facilities, whereas the antiviral screening of pseudotype virus is conducted in BSL-2 facilities. In this study, we developed a SARS-CoV-2 spike-pseudotyped virus based on a semi-replication-competent retroviral (s-RCR) vector system. The s-RCR vector system was divided into two packageable vectors, each with gag-pol and env genes. For env vector construction, SARS-CoV-2 SΔ19 env was inserted into the pCLXSN-IRES-EGFP retroviral vector to generate pCLXSN-SΔ19 env-EGFP. When pCLXSN-gag-pol and pCLXSN-SΔ19env-EGFP were co-transfected into HEK293 T cells to generate an s-RCR virus, titers of the s-RCR virus were consistently low in this transient transfection system (1 × 10⁴ TU/mL). However, a three-fold higher amounts of MLV-based SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped viruses (3 × 10⁴ TU/mL) were released from stable producer cells, and the spike proteins induced syncytia formation in HEK293-hACE2 cells. Furthermore, s-RCR stocks collected from stable producer cells induced more substantial syncytia formation in the Vero E6-TMPRSS2 cell line than in the Vero E6 cell line. Therefore, a combination of the s-RCR vector and the two cell lines (HEK293-hACE2 or Vero E6-TMPRSS2) that induce syncytia formation can be useful for the rapid screening of novel fusion inhibitor drugs.

Production of a replicating retroviral vector expressing Reovirus fast protein for cancer gene therapy

Reovirus fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) proteins induce syncytium formation. Recently, several studies have shown that the use of recombinant vectors engineered to express fusion proteins is becoming attractive for the development of enhanced oncolytic viruses. In this study, we investigated the cytotoxic effect of four different FAST proteins (p10 FAST of Avian reovirus [ARV], p10 FAST of Pulau virus [PuV], p13 FAST of Broome virus [BroV], and p14 FAST of reptilian reovirus [RRV]). Plasmids encoding FASTs were transfected into Vero cells. All FAST proteins induced syncytium formation at varying intensities. To achieve high levels of FAST expression, four different FAST genes were inserted into the murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based replication-competent retroviral (RCR) vector. Two days after transfection in 293 T cells, only the MoMLV-10A1-p10(PuV) RCR vector showed syncytia formation. Based on these results, p10(Puv) was selected from the four FASTs. Next, we investigated the cytotoxicity of p10(PuV) on HeLa cervical carcinoma cells, HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells, and U87 human glioma cells. Although three human cancer cell lines induced syncytium formation, U87 cells were highly susceptible to syncytia formation by transfection with p10(PuV). In addition, the viral supernatants from MoMLV-10A-p10(PuV) RCR vector-transfected 293 T cells also induced syncytium formation in HT1080, TE671, and U87 cells. This RCR vector encoding p10(PuV) is a promising candidate for cancer gene therapy.

Construction of a replication-competent retroviral vector for expression of the VSV-G envelope glycoprotein for cancer gene therapy

Gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) can infect a wide variety of cells but fails to infect most cells derived from laboratory mice. Transduction of human hematopoietic stem cells with GALV retroviral vectors is more efficient than with amphotropic vectors. In this study, a Moloney murine leukemia virus-gibbon ape leukemia virus (MoMLV-GALV) vector was constructed by replacing the natural env gene of the full-length Moloney MLV genome with the GALV env gene. To monitor viral transmission by green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression, internal ribosomal entry site-enhanced GFP (IRES-EGFP) was positioned between the GALV env gene and the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) to obtain pMoMLV-GALV-EGFP. The MoMLV-GALV-EGFP vector was able to replicate with high titer in TE671 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells and U-87 human glioma cells. To evaluate the potential of the MoMLV-GALV vector as a therapeutic agent, the gene for the fusogenic envelope G glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G) was incorporated into the vector. Infection with the resulting MoMLV-GALV-VSV-G vector resulted in lysis of the U-87 cells due to syncytium formation. Syncytium formation was also observed in the transfected human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP after extended cultivation of cells. In addition, we deleted the GALV env gene from the MoMLV-GALV-VSV-G vector to improve viral genome stability. This MoMLV-VSV-G vector is also replication competent and induces syncytium formation in 293T, HT1080, TE671 and U-87 cells. These results suggest that replication of the MoMLV-GALV-VSV-G vector or MoMLV-VSV-G vector may directly lead to cytotoxicity. Therefore, the vectors developed in this study are potentially useful tools for cancer gene therapy.

Oncolytic Viruses for Cancer Therapy: Barriers and Recent Advances

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are powerful new therapeutic agents in cancer therapy. With the first OV (talimogene laherparepvec [T-vec]) obtaining US Food and Drug Administration approval, interest in OVs has been boosted greatly. Nevertheless, despite extensive research, oncolytic virotherapy has shown limited efficacy against solid tumors. Recent advances in viral retargeting, genetic editing, viral delivery platforms, tracking strategies, OV-based gene therapy, and combination strategies have the potential to broaden the applications of oncolytic virotherapy in oncology. In this review, we present several insights into the limitations and challenges of oncolytic virotherapy, describe the strategies mentioned above, provide a summary of recent preclinical and clinical trials in the field of oncolytic virotherapy, and highlight the need to optimize current strategies to improve clinical outcomes.