Adjustable gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass. Can evidence-based medicine help us to choose?

Does Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy lead to Barrett's esophagus, 5-year esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most prevalent approaches to tackle obesity and its co-morbidities. The main complication following the LSG is Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), with most patients developing worsening symptoms of GERD, and a small number progressing to Barrett's esophagus. This retrospective analysis aims to assess the rate of GERD pre- and post- LSG as well as the rate of progression to Barrett's.

Methods

Data was collected from 1639 patients. 92 patients fit our inclusion criteria. Data was then analyzed and summarized against similar literature.

Results

Of 64 (69.6%) patients who had normal EGD findings pre-LSG, only 28 patients (30.4%) had the same results 5 years post-LSG (p= < 0.05). The number of patients who had Grade A GERD almost quadrupled post-LSG, increasing from 3 patients (3.3%) to 14 (15.2%). Patients with esophagitis/gastritis/duodenitis increased from 20 (21.7%) to 32 patients (34.8%). Patients with hiatal hernias increased from 4 (4.4%) to 10 patients (10.9%). The most significant result is that 2 out of 92 patients developed Barrett's Esophagus (2.2%), while 7 other patients developed further serious complications.

Conclusion

LSG is a very effective and safe bariatric procedure. However, the major downslide is that it can lead to the aggravation of GERD symptoms. This paper and the included literature demonstrate that LSG does lead to a substantial increase in the rate of GERD, however, the percentages of Barrett's Esophagus are markedly low. Performing an EGD pre- and post- LSG is an important protocol that aids in the diagnosis and management of LSG related GERD.

•

The main complication post-LSG is Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), with some progressing to Barrett’s esophagus.

•

We assessed Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) results pre-LSG and 5 yrs post-op to determine the development of Barrett’s.

•

This paper and the included literature demonstrate that LSG does lead to the development of Barrett’s Esophagus.

•

Performing an EGD pre- and post-LSG is an important protocol that aids in the diagnosis and management of LSG related GERD.

Trends in Bariatric Surgery in Spain in the Twenty-First Century: Baseline Results and 1-Month Follow Up of the RICIBA, a National Registry

BACKGROUND

Specific data is needed to safely expand bariatric surgery and to preserve good surgical outcomes in response to the non-stop increase in obesity prevalence worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study are to provide an overview of the baseline characteristics, type of surgery, and 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in Spanish public hospitals, and evaluate changes throughout the 2000-2014 period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a descriptive study using data from the RICIBA, a computerized multicenter and multidisciplinary registry created by the Obesity Group of the Endocrinology and Nutrition Spanish Society. Three periods according to the date of surgery were created: January 2000 to December 2004 (G1), January 2005 to December 2009 (G2), and January 2010 to December 2014 (G3).

RESULTS

Data from 3843 patients were available (44.8 ± 10.5 years, a 3:1 female-to-male ratio, 46.9 ± 8.2 kg/m(2)). Throughout the 15-year period assessed, candidate patients for bariatric surgery were progressively older and less obese, with an increase in associated comorbidities and in the prevalence of men. The global trend also showed a progressive decrease in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the most performed bariatric procedure (75.1 % in G1, 69.3 % in G2, and 42.6 % in G3; p < 0.001), associated with a parallel increase in sleeve gastrectomy (0.8 % in G1, 18.1 % in G2, and 39.6 % in G3; p < 0.001). An overall mortality rate of 0.3 % was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from Spain is similar to data observed worldwide. Information recorded in the National Registries like RICIBA is necessary in order to safely expand bariatric surgery in response to increasing demand.

[Management of failures and complications in weight loss surgery]

The specific management of the surgical risks linked to obesity, as well as technological advances combined with the standardisation of techniques, have significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with bariatric surgery over recent decades. However, as with all surgery, patients are exposed to medical and surgical failures and complications.

Changes in problematic and disordered eating after gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding and vertical sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review of pre-post studies

Despite differences in their mechanisms and outcomes, little is known about whether postsurgical changes in eating behaviours also differ by bariatric procedure. Following a systematic search, 23 studies on changes in binge eating disorder (BED) and related behaviours, bulimia nervosa and related behaviours, night eating syndrome, grazing and emotional eating after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric banding (AGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) were reviewed. Significant methodological problems and a dearth of literature regarding many behaviours and VSG were seen. Regarding BED and related behaviours, although later re-increases were noted, short to medium-term reductions after RYGB were common, and reported changes after AGB were inconsistent. Short to medium-term reductions in emotional eating, and from a few studies, short to long-term reductions in bulimic symptoms, were reported after RYGB. Reoccurrences and new occurrences of problem and disordered eating, especially BED and binge episodes, were apparent after RYGB and AGB. Further conclusions and comparisons could not be made because of limited or low-quality evidence. Long-term comparison studies of changes to problematic and disordered eating in RYGB, AGB and VSG patients are needed. It is currently unclear whether any bariatric procedure leads to long-term improvement of any problematic or disordered eating behaviours.

Age- and sex-specific effects on weight loss outcomes in a comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures undertaken globally but there are no evidenced-based criteria that inform the selection of one operation over the other. The purpose of this study was thus to compare weight loss outcomes between RYGBP and SG, and to define patient factors affecting weight loss.

Methods

A single-centre two-year follow-up retrospective cohort study of all adults who underwent either RYGBP (n = 422) or SG (n = 432) between 2007 and 2012, at University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, an academic tertiary referral centre, was undertaken. Multilevel linear regression was used to compare weight loss between groups, enabling adjustment for preoperative BMI (body mass index) and evaluation for interaction factors.

Results

One- and two-year results showed that unadjusted BMI loss was similar between groups; 13.7 kg/m² (95% CI: 12.9, 14.6 kg/m²) and 12.8 kg/m² (95% CI: 11.8, 13.9 kg/m²) for RYGBP patients respectively compared with 13.3 kg/m² (95% CI: 12.0, 14.6 kg/m²) and 11.5 kg/m² (95% CI: 10.1, 13.0 kg/m²) for SG patients respectively. Adjusting for preoperative BMI, there was 2.2 kg/m² (95% CI: 1.5, 2.8) and 2.3 kg/m² (95% CI: 1.3, 3.3) greater BMI loss in the RYGBP group compared to the SG group at one and two years respectively (P < 0.001 for both). The interaction analyses demonstrated that age and sex had important differential impacts on SG and RYGBP weight outcomes. Men under 40 and women over 50 years obtained on average far less benefit from SG compared to RYGBP, whereas men over 40 years and women under 50 years experienced similar weight loss with either procedure (P = 0.001 and 0.022 for interaction effects at one and two years respectively).

Conclusions

Our results show that patient sex and age significantly impact on weight loss in a procedure-dependent manner and should be considered when choosing between RYGBP and SG. Optimizing procedure selection could enhance the effectiveness of bariatric surgery, thus further increasing the benefit-to-risk ratio of this highly effective intervention.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2052-9538-1-12) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Older adults fighting obesity with bariatric surgery: Benefits, side effects, and outcomes

The aging population is growing exponentially worldwide. Associated with this greater life expectancy is the increased burden of chronic health conditions, many of which are exacerbated by the continued rise in obesity. In the US, the prevalence of obesity in adults aged 60 years and older increased from 23.6% to 37% in 2010.