The Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 for the Japanese-speaking Population

The Minimal Important Difference of Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Treatment of Voice Disorders

OBJECTIVES

The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a reliable tool that objectively assesses dysphonia levels using six acoustic parameters. Despite its high criterion-related concurrent validity, diagnostic accuracy, and minimal detectable change derived from test-retest reliability, the minimal important difference (MID) of the AVQI has not been tested before. This study aimed to estimate the MIDs of AVQI for improvement audibly perceived by clinicians and self-reported improvement by patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients who received treatment for voice disorders. Patients completed AVQI and Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) questionnaires before and after the therapy. The MIDs of the AVQI were estimated using the anchor of either auditory-perceptual judgment of total dysphonia levels by clinicians or the VHI-10 questionnaire by patients. A distribution-based approach was also used to complement the results.

RESULTS

First, using the auditory-perceptual anchor, a decrease of 0.95 in the AVQI was estimated as the MID for clinicians' perception, as a result of the receiver operating curve. Then, using the patient-reported anchor, an improvement of 1.36 in the AVQI was estimated as the MID for patients' voice-related disability. The distribution-based approach also ensured the anchor-based results of both the MIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The AVQI is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating voice quality, and a 0.95 decrease in the AVQI represents a meaningful improvement for clinicians' perception, whereas a 1.36 decrease in the AVQI influences patients' self-reported disability. This study contributes to understanding the minimal change necessary for clinicians to make informed decisions and ensure patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:2805-2811, 2024.

The feasibility of using acoustic measures for predicting the Total Opacity Scores of chest computed tomography scans in patients with COVID-19

To study the possibility of using acoustic parameters, i.e., Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and Maximum Phonation Time (MPT) for predicting the degree of lung involvement in COVID-19 patients. This cross-sectional case-control study was conducted on the voice samples collected from 163 healthy individuals and 181 patients with COVID-19. Each participant produced a sustained vowel/a/, and a phonetically balanced Persian text containing 36 syllables. AVQI and MPT were measured using Praat scripts. Each patient underwent a non-enhanced chest computed tomographic scan and the Total Opacity score was rated to assess the degree of lung involvement. The results revealed significant differences between patients with COVID-19 and healthy individuals in terms of AVQI and MPT. A significant difference was also observed between male and female participants in AVQI and MPT. The results from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve indicated that MPT (0.909) had higher diagnostic accuracy than AVQI (0.771). A significant relationship was observed between AVQI and TO scores. In the case of MPT, however, no such relationship was observed. The findings indicated that MPT was a better classifier in differentiating patients from healthy individuals, in comparison with AVQI. The results also showed that AVQI can be used as a predictor of the degree of patients' and recovered individuals' lung involvement. A formula is suggested for calculating the degree of lung involvement using AVQI.

The Performance of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Synthesized Voices

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the performance of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) in synthesized voice samples.

METHOD

The validity of the AVQI and ABI performances was analyzed in synthesized voice samples controlling the degree of predefined deviations for overall voice quality (G-scale) and breathiness (B-scale). A range of 26 synthesized voice samples with various severity degrees in G-scale with and without prominence of breathiness for male and female voices were created.

RESULTS

ABI received higher validity in the evaluation of breathiness than AVQI. Furthermore, ABI evaluated accurately breathiness degrees without considering roughness effects in voice samples and confirmed the findings of other studies with natural voices. Furthermore, ABI was more robust than AVQI in the evaluation of severe voice-disordered voice samples. Finally, AVQI represented moreover overall voice quality with an emphasis of breathiness evaluation and less roughness although roughness had a necessary component in overall voice quality evaluation.

CONCLUSION

AVQI and ABI are two robust measurements in the evaluation of voice quality. However, ABI received fewer errors than AVQI in the analyses of higher abnormalities in the voice signal. Disturbances of other subtypes of abnormal overall voice quality such as roughness were not demonstrated in the results of ABI.

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Persian Language

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to validate the acoustic voice quality index version 03.01 (AVQIv3) and the acoustic breathiness index (ABI) in the Persian language.

METHODS

Six judges assessed the severity degree of the abnormal overall voice quality (hoarseness) and breathiness from continuous speech (cs) and sustained vowel (sv) in 136 voices samples of dysphonic and 45 vocally healthy participants. Firstly, the time length of cs and sv was balanced out for a higher level of ecological validity. Secondly, the concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy were statistically analyzed with the Spearman rank-order correlation, and the receiver operating characteristics, likelihood ratio, and Youden index.

RESULTS

There was substantial inter-rater reliability between judges regarding hoarseness and breathiness. Twenty syllables were identified as the standardized number of syllables for the cs part. Sufficient correlations were found between AVQI and hoarseness (rs = 0.74), and between ABI and breathiness (rs = 0.74), respectively. The thresholds of 1.63 (sensitivity of 73.2% and specificity of 91%) and 2.97 (sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 87%) yielded the highest level of diagnostic findings for AVQI and ABI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AVQIv3 and ABI are reliable indices to quantify the abnormal overall voice quality and breathiness in the Persian language.

The Significant Influence of Hoarseness Levels in Connected Speech on the Voice-Related Disability Evaluated Using Voice Handicap Index-10

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study examines the influence of voice quality in connected speech (CS) and sustained vowels (SV) on the voice-related disability in patients' daily living documented by Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).

METHODS

A total of 500 voice recordings of CS and SV samples from 338 patients with voice disturbances were included, along with the patients' age, diagnoses, maximum phonation time, and VHI-10. Dataset-1 comprised of 338 untreated patients, whereas Dataset-2 included 162 patients before and after phonosurgeries. As a preliminary study, the concurrent and diagnostic validities based on auditory-perceptual judgments were examined for cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and CPP smoothed (CPPS) for CS and SV tasks. Next, simple correlations and multivariate regression analyses (MRA) were performed to identify which of the acoustic measures for the CS or SV tasks significantly influenced the total score or improvement of VHI-10.

RESULTS

The preliminary study confirmed high correlations with hoarseness levels as well as the excellent diagnostic accuracy of CPP and CPPS for both CS and SV tasks. In Dataset-1, the simple correlations and MRA results showed that cepstral measures in both tasks demonstrated moderate correlations with, and significant contribution to the total score of VHI-10, respectively. However, in Dataset-2, the changes of cepstral measures, as well as the median pitch after phonosurgeries in the CS tasks only, showed significant contributions to the improvement of VHI-10.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the hoarseness levels in both the CS and SV tasks equivalently influenced the VHI-10 scores, and that the post-surgical change of voice quality only in the CS tasks influenced the improvement of voice-related disability in daily living.

A Comparative Study on Acoustic Voice Quality Index Between the Subjects with Spasmodic Dysphonia and Normophonia

Spasmodic dysphonia is one of the neurologic voice disorders that is rare, chronic and long term caused by excessive or inappropriate contraction of the laryngeal muscles. The condition is more common in females than males. Assessment of such disorders requires acoustic, perceptual, instrumental and self-reported rating scales for effective diagnosis and intervention. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index is a recent, multivariate acoustic measure of dysphonia measuring the overall quality of voice including both vowels and connected speech in Praat software using AVQI script. The study aimed at comparing, observing and analysing the thresholds of AVQI obtained in the two groups. The study also targeted to show an effective co relation between GRBAS scale and thresholds of AVQI using sustained vowel /α/ and Bengali oral passage. A total of 14 participants were chosen with age range 20-50 years, 7 participants were normophonic and 7 participants were having spasmodic dysphonia. Comparison was done between the 2 groups showing a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the groups. A strong co relation was obtained (α = 0.98) between two scales. Thus AVQI does the job of appropriate diagnostic tool for obtaining the scores of dysphonic population and need to be explored in other voice problems.

The acoustic voice quality index, version 2.06 and 3.01, for the Persian-speaking population

INTRODUCTION

Dysphonia assessment includes approaches like acoustic analysis, which is non-invasive and easy to use and provides an understandable numerical output. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is an acoustic model that can detect dysphonia. The Persian language is spoken by around 70,000,000 native speakers. Since AVQI versions 2.06 and 3.01 have not been validated for the Persian yet, this study investigated their concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy among the Persian-speaking population.

METHODS

This scale development study was conducted from 2020 to 2021 on 180 normophonic and dysphonic native Persian-speaking residents of Mashhad, Iran. Five raters rated the samples by auditory-perceptual-judgments, including Grade from the Grade-Rough-Breathy-Asthenic-Strained (an ordinal scale) and the overall dysphonia severity from the Persian version Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (a continuous scale) to investigate both versions' concurrent validity. The intra- and inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity were evaluated for both scales. Both versions' diagnostic accuracy was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic, and the optimal thresholds were determined.

RESULTS

AVQI-version-2-Persian thresholds of 3.47 and 4.04 provided sensitivity of 88.30% and 85.53% and specificity of 79.07% and 85.58% by the ordinal and continuous scales, respectively. AVQI-version-3-Persian thresholds of 3.07 and 3.03 also rendered sensitivity of 74.47% and 85.53%, and specificity of 97.67% and 91.35% by the ordinal and continuous scales sequentially.

CONCLUSION

The significant values of concurrent validities and diagnostic accuracies of both versions of AVQI-Persian confirmed that it can discriminate between normal and pathological voices among the Persian-speaking population. Hence, it can be used for screening or diagnosis purposes.

Meta-Analysis on the Validity of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index

BACKGROUND

Acoustic measurements are useful tools to objectively measure overall voice quality. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) has shown to be a valid multiparametric tool to objectify dysphonia severity. The increasing number of validity studies investigating AVQI's validity demands a comprehensive synthesis of the available outcomes.

OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW

The aim of the present meta-analysis is to quantify the evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of the AVQI, including its sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio statistics, and its concurrent validity and sensitivity to changes in auditory-perceptual voice quality ratings.

TYPE OF REVIEW

Meta-analysis SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library and Web of Science were searched from 2010 till April 2021 with an additional manual search, using keywords related to AVQI and common terminologies of validity outcomes. Studies considering the clinical validity of AVQI (ie, diagnostic accuracy, concurrent validity and sensitivity to change), using auditory-perceptual voice quality evaluation as reference, were included.

EVALUATION METHOD

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines were used. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. For the diagnostic accuracy of AVQI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio statistics were determined using a summary receiver operating characteristic approach. Weighted correlation coefficient measures (rW¯) were used to assess the concurrent validity and sensitivity to change.

RESULTS

A total of 198 studies were screened and 33 articles were included. In total, voice samples of 11447, 10272, and 367 different subjects were considered for analysis of diagnostic accuracy, concurrent validity and change responsiveness, respectively. Satisfying diagnostic accuracy results were found with a pooled sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.82-0.83), a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88-0.90), a pooled positive LR of 7.75 (95% CI: 6.04-9.95), a pooled negative LR of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.16-0.23), and a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 47.13 (95% CI: 34.82-63.79). Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an excellent AUC value of 0.937 and Q* index of 0.874. Strong correlations of rW¯ = 0.838 for concurrent validity and rW¯ = 0.796 for sensitivity to change were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the general clinical utility of the AVQI as a robust and valid objective measure for evaluating overall dysphonia severity across languages and study methods.

Validation of Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) in the South Indian Population

BACKGROUND

Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) is an acoustic model which equates to the auditory-perceptual (A-P) measure of breathiness. Globally, ABI has been validated in multiple languages. To date, empirical studies validating ABI in the South Indian population have not been carried out. Moreover, there is only minimal evidence on the impact of language and gender on ABI.

OBJECTIVES

This study attempted to validate ABI in languages of Malayalam and Kannada with "B" and "G" of GRBAS. The authors also examined the influence of language and gender on ABI.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed a dataset consisting of 160 voice samples (91 normophonic and 69 dysphonic). Five speech-language pathologists perceptually evaluated these samples on the GRBAS scale. PRAAT software was used to calculate ABI for each voice sample. The authors also determined the effects of language and gender on ABI. Following this, ABI's concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy were examined relating to "B" and "G" of the GRBAS scale.

RESULTS

The judges reached a moderate agreement on the perceptual evaluation of voice quality. The authors observed neither language nor gender differences in ABI. The concurrent validity of ABI was strong (r = 0.761) when correlated against "B". Further, evaluations revealed that an ABI value of >3.66 could distinguish between breathy and non-breathy voice samples with an area under the curve of 0.816 (Sensitivity = 61.73%; Specificity = 94.93%). On the other hand, the concurrent validity of ABI in correlation with "G" did not yield the optimal result.

CONCLUSIONS

ABI is a valid acoustic tool for identifying breathiness in the languages of Malayalam and Kannada. ABI correlates better with "B" than "G" on the GRBAS scale. ABI is independent of language and gender.

The Degree of Change and Relationship in Self-perceived Handicap and Acoustic Voice Quality Associated With Voice Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Outcome measures describing acoustic voice quality and self-perceived vocal handicap are commonly used in clinical voice practice. Previous reports of the relationship between acoustic and self-perceived measures have found only limited associations, but it is unclear if acoustic measures associated with voice quality and self-perceived voice handicap change in a similar manner over the course of voice treatment. The current study, therefore, considered the relationship between the degree of change in Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30 and VHI-10) in dysphonic patients receiving treatment in a private practice voice clinic.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from patient records of a private practice voice clinic over 80 consecutive months. For each patient, their voice disorder diagnosis, age, and biological sex were collected as well as pre-and post-treatment measures of the AVQI and VHI-30 or VHI-10 depending on which version was used. Correlations were calculated between the AVQI and VHI-30 and the AVQI and VHI-10 before and after treatment as well as for the percentage change of AVQI and VHI-30/VHI-10. Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine the pre-and post-treatment effect and group differences respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included in the analyses. The scores of the AVQI (χ²[1] = 24.01, P < 0.001), VHI-30 (χ²[1] = 18.00, P < 0.001), and VHI-10 (χ²[1] = 38.35, P < 0.001) all improved significantly after treatment. However, correlations between the AVQI and VHI-30, and the AVQI and VHI-10 were all non-significant, except for a moderate correlation between the AVQI and VHI-10 before treatment (r[43] = 0.31, P = 0.04). The percentage change of the AVQI and the VHI-30/VHI-10 did not correlate significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Voice therapy significantly improved acoustic and self-perceived vocal outcome measures. However, there was no significant relationship between these measures before or after treatment, nor was there a relationship in their degree of change. Results support the notion that VHI and AVQI measure unique constructs and that voice therapy can have a positive impact on both.

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) in the Measurement of Voice Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a multiparametric construct of voice quality recognized for its clinical and research applications around the globe. This study aimed to review the validity and diagnostic accuracy of AVQI (v02&03) and determine the effects of age and gender.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis registered with the PROSPERO registry. The authors searched two databases (PubMed and Cochrane Library database) for relevant studies. Studies selected for the systematic review were grouped based on study objectives. To determine the quality of the selected studies, the authors utilized the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of seven studies on AVQIv02 revealed a diagnostic threshold ranging from 2.72 to 3.33 for AVQIv02. In comparison, eight studies investigating AVQIv03 suggested a diagnostic threshold ranging from 1.33 to 3.15 for AVQIv03. Altogether, these studies demonstrated a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.92 for AVQIv02 and 0.82 and 0.92 for AVQIv03. The Area under the Curve was slightly better for AVQIv03 (0.94) than AVQIv02 (0.92). Three studies investigating the effect of age and gender on AVQI had a consensus that AVQI is independent of gender. However, findings were contradictory about the impact of age on AVQI.

CONCLUSIONS

AVQI is found to be a valid tool for the assessment of voice quality. AVQIv03 is slightly better than AVQIv02 in its diagnostic accuracy. AVQI is independent of gender. Because of the contradictory evidence, additional research on the effects of age on AVQI is necessary.

Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population

BACKGROUND

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) has emerged in the recent past as a robust multiparametric voice quality evaluation tool. Two versions of AVQI derived using the program PRAAT have found extensive clinical and research applications. These versions have been validated in several languages around the world. However, no research reports are available on validation of AVQI in the South Indian population. Further, studies comparing the performance of the two versions of AVQI are limited in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to validate and compare the two versions of AVQI (AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01) in South Indian languages (Malayalam and Kannada).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of previously recorded voice samples was carried out on a total of 160 (91 normophonic and 69 dysphonic) voice samples. These samples were perceptually rated on a GRBAS scale by five experienced speech-language pathologists. Standardized Syllable Number (SSN) necessary to derive AVQIv03.01 was computed. Following this, these samples were analyzed to obtain the AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01. The concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures were then examined and compared.

RESULTS

A moderate agreement was obtained across the judges on perceptual evaluation of voice quality. SSN in Malayalam and Kannada languages were identified to be 29 and 25 syllables respectively. Language differences were not observed on both versions of AVQI. The concurrent validity of AVQIv03.01 (r = 0.788) was superior to that of AVQIv02.02 (r = 0.655). Further, the threshold of differentiating normophonic and dysphonic samples were determined to be >3.45 for AVQIv02.02 and >2.45 for AVQIv03.01.

CONCLUSIONS

AVQIv03.01 is superior to AVQIv02.02 in terms of its diagnostic accuracy and concurrent validity. Current findings also extend the application of AVQI as a robust tool for the evaluation of voice characteristics to the South Indian population.

The Impact of Languages and Cultural Backgrounds on Voice Quality Analyses

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to verify the influence of different cultural backgrounds and languages on the perception of voice quality. Another aim was to evaluate the correlation between clinical auditory-perceptual judgments with acoustic measurements, such as the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) and the acoustic breathiness index (ABI), i.e., their effect on the concurrent validity.

METHODS

Brazilian and European participants rated 2 culturally and linguistically different datasets (i.e., 150 Brazilian Portuguese and 218 German voice sample sets), with each dataset containing concatenated voice samples of continuous speech and sustained phonation. The raters evaluated the vocal quality in terms of the overall voice quality and breathiness. Intra- and interrater reliabilities were also tested. The psychometric qualities of the AVQI and the ABI (concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy) were analyzed, considering the perceptual ratings of Brazilian and European participants for each dataset.

RESULTS

Rater reliability decreased for nonnative participants when evaluating the nonnative dataset. Brazilian raters perceived the German voices as more severe, whereas German raters considered the overall voice quality of Brazilian voices as less severe than native raters. The concurrent validity of the AVQI and the ABI, i.e., the agreement with the auditory-perceptual evaluations, was high irrespectively of the group of participants. The diagnostic accuracy, which refers to the ability to identify a deviated voice, was higher, considering the perceptual evaluations of native listeners.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian raters classified voice quality as more deviated, and the Brazilian voice samples were measured to be less severe (a possible language characteristic). Further studies are necessary to verify whether there was a task or sample consequence or if adjustments to the AVQI and ABI equations are required for Brazilian Portuguese.

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) Version 03.01 in Italian

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 in the Italian language (AVQIv3-IT).

METHODS

A total of 150 native Italian speakers with normal voices (n = 50) and with various voice disorders (n = 100) were enrolled. Voice samples of a sustained vowel (SV) [a:] and five phonetically balanced continuous speech (CS) samples were recorded. The most appropriate syllable number for a standardized voiced CS approximating 3 seconds was identified. Perceptual evaluations of the overall voice quality were performed by three expert voice clinicians using the G score of the GRBAS scale. AVQIs were calculated using a 3 seconds mid-vowel selection of the SV [a:] and the standardized syllable number of the CS. Finally, concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of AVQIv3-IT were analysed.

RESULTS

The most appropriate syllable number for a standardized CS approximating 3 seconds in Italian was identified as 25. The perceptual ratings showed robust intra- and inter-rater reliability. A strong correlation was found between AVQI scores and overall voice quality perceptual evaluations (r = 0.81, P < 0.001). The best diagnostic outcome for AVQIv3-IT was found for a threshold of 2.35 (sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92%).

CONCLUSIONS

AVQIv3-IT was demonstrated to be a valid and robust tool for quantifying overall acoustic voice quality in the Italian speaking population.

Validation of the acoustic breathiness index to the Brazilian Portuguese language

OBJECTIVE

To assess the concurrent validity and the diagnostic accuracy of the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) in Brazilian Portuguese.

METHODS

The counting numbers 1-20 and the vowel /a/ of 150 subjects were recorded (37 vocally healthy and 113 with dysphonia). The analyzed samples were the counting number 1-11 and 3 s of the sustained vowel. Nine voice specialists performed the perceptual judgment of the degree of breathiness. The Spearman Correlation and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess ABI's concurrent validity and diagnosis accuracy.

RESULTS

Results from five listeners were chosen for the study analyses due to moderate and substantial intra-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa values = 0.520-0.772) and moderate inter-rater reliability (Fleiss Kappa = 0.353). The ABI presented a high concurrent validity (r = 0.746); 55.6% of the breathiness vocal deviation can be explained by the acoustic analysis (r² = 0.556). The ROC curve presented good diagnostic accuracy (85.2%). At a threshold of 2.94, the sensitivity was 75.3% and the specificity was 93.4%.

CONCLUSION

The ABI is a valid tool for screening and patient's follow-up regarding breathy vocal qualities in the Brazilian Portuguese language.

Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Its Isolated Acoustic Measures to Discriminate the Severity of Voice Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and its isolated acoustic measures accuracy in discriminating voices with different degrees of deviation.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-eight voice samples (160 dysphonic; 98 vocally healthy). Information regarding acoustic analysis and overall degree of deviation (G) were considered. The acoustic analysis consisted of the AVQI total score and its isolated acoustic measures: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPs); harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR); shimmer local and dB (Shim, ShdB); the general slope of the spectrum (Slope) and tilt of the regression line through the spectrum (Tilt). The auditory-perceptual judgment was the median G score of five voice specialists (Cohen's = 0.605-0.773; Fleiss = 0.370). Quadratic discriminant analysis and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of performance measures were used to investigate the discriminatory power of these measures.

RESULTS

AVQI presented acceptable accuracy to differentiate voices with no vocal deviation and with vocal deviation (73.9%) and among the degrees of deviation (mild vs. moderate = 70.49%; mild vs. moderate = 71.39%; moderate vs. severe = 87.5%). No isolated acoustic measurement was consistent with differentiating voice quality among all degrees of deviation. A combination of five acoustic measures (CPPs, HNR, ShdB, Slope, Tilt) had the highest accuracy to differentiate between healthy and deviated voice (75.55%). Shimmer was more accurate to discriminate between voices with mild, moderate, and severe deviation; almost all isolated acoustic measurements were accurate to discriminate voices with moderate and severe deviation. The combination of acoustic measures presented higher accuracy (mild vs. moderate = 70.21%-74.29%; mild vs. moderate = 71.53%-76.11%; moderate vs. severe = 86%-95.50%).

CONCLUSION

AVQI is an accepted tool to discriminate among different degrees of vocal deviation, and more accurate between voices with moderate and severe deviations. Isolated acoustic measures perform better when discriminating voices with a higher degree of deviation. A combination of acoustic parameters, with the same weight, is more accurate to discriminate different degrees of deviation, however, not consistent.

Influence of the Voice Sample Length in Perceptual and Acoustic Voice Quality Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the variations that different voice sample length (VSL) has on the perceived degree of voice quality deviation and on the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) accuracy.

METHODS

Voices of 71 subjects (53 dysphonic; 18 vocally health) were recorded: numbers 1-20 (42 syllables) + vowel/a/. Three different VSL were edited: VSL_long, 1-20 + 3 seconds vowel/a/; VSL_cust, customized length, were voiced-segments of the continuous speech had the same length of the vowel (mean = 18.73 syllables corresponding to 3 seconds of only-voiced segments) + 3 seconds vowel/a/; VSL_short, 1-10 (15 syllables) + 3 seconds vowel/a/. Three voice specialists perceptually judged the overall voice quality (G); 3 sessions were performed to evaluate each VSL variant. AVQI's precision and Spearman correlation were assessed.

RESULTS

The intra-rater reliability was "almost perfect" (kappa >0.826) for all evaluators in VSL_short; "substantial" (0.684) and "almost perfect" (0.897) in VSL_cust and "fair" (0.447) to "almost perfect" (1.000) in VSL_long. The inter-rater reliability was "moderate" (0.554) for VSL_long, "substantial" (0.622 and 0.618) for VSL_cust and VSL_short. The Gmean and AVQI_mean were perceived as more severe for longer samples and less severe for shorter samples. Considering the AVQI, VSL_short (r = 0.665) presented the higher correlation. VSL_cust presented the best area under the ROC curve (0.821). VSL_long and VSL_cust specificity was 100%, VSL_short specificity was 75%; higher sensitivity was observed for VSL_short (74%).

CONCLUSION

The voice quality outcomes changes for different VSLs. Longer VSLs seem to be perceived as more deviated, shorter VSLs seem to be more reliable and have better correlation with the acoustic analysis. The AVQI best accuracy was found at a customized length. Thus, to increase the voice analysis reliability, standardized procedure must be followed, including a precise speech material control allowing comparison among clinics and voice-centers.

Comparison of Cepstral Analysis Based on Voiced-Segment Extraction and Voice Tasks for Discriminating Dysphonic and Normophonic Korean Speakers

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether there are differences in the discriminatory power of cepstral analysis according to the voiced-segment extraction method and voice tasks used for identifying dysphonic and normophonic Korean individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2,863 subjects (2,595 subjects with and 268 subjects without dysphonia) were included in this study. The 3-second sustained vowel (SV) /a/ and one sentence of "Sanchaek" were edited and analyzed using Praat scripts. Cepstral analyses (cepstral peak prominence [CPP], smoothed cepstral peak prominence [CPPS], and low/high spectral ratio [LHRatio]) were performed using three voice tasks, namely, SV, continuous speech (CS), and extracted continuous speech (EXT) samples. Additionally, auditory-perceptual (A-P) assessments were performed by three speech language pathologists.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between dysphonic and normophonic voice groups for all cepstral parameters, except the LHRatio_EXT. Cepstral measurements of both SV and CS were highly correlated with A-P ratings. Furthermore, the diagnostic predictive power of CPP and CPPS for CS using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was >0.919, the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was ≥6.85, and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was ≤0.23. Additionally, for EXT, the AUC was >0.816, LR+ was 3.10, and LR- was ≤0.33.

CONCLUSION

Both CS and EXT can predict dysphonia relatively well (r > 0.816). EXT showed lower predictability than the original sample (CS) analysis. Subsequent studies should implement voiced-segment extraction methods using various algorithms.

Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening

INTRODUCTION

To diminish the risk of voice disorders in people who are highly dependent on their voices, such as teachers, vocal screening is important already at the beginning of such individuals' professional studies. A reliable, specified screening tool is needed. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) has been found to differentiate normal voices from abnormal voices and to serve as a treatment outcome measure. This study investigated whether AVQI could be a screening tool in combination with auditory- and self-perception of the voice to discriminate normal from slightly poor voices.

TYPE OF STUDY

Experimental.

METHODS

Some 128 female teaching students (mean age 26.39 years, SD 9.80 years) with no diagnosed voice disorders participated in this study. They read aloud a text in Finnish, sustained the vowel /a:/, and filled the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaire. Voice samples were recorded with an AKG C544L headset microphone, iFocusrite soundcard, and Praat software using a 44100 sample rate and 16-bit amplitude quantization. Five expert voice therapists evaluated the samples to determine the grade of dysphonia (G) using a scale of 0-0.5 (=normal), 0.5-1 (=mild), 1-2 (=moderate), and 2-3 (=severe). Three medial seconds of [a:] and the first 31 syllables of the text were analyzed using AVQI script version 03.01 in Praat (5.3.55). The analysis gives one AVQI score per participant (scale 0-10). The AVQI threshold of normal and disordered voices for Finnish speakers is 1.83; a G_mean = 0.0-0.5 and VHI score <19 were considered normal. Statistical analysis was done using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and the independent samples t test.

RESULTS

According to the AVQI results, the area under the curve (A_ROC) was 0.554, which is fair. The Youden index gave a cutoff value of 0.30 with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 81.1%. There were weak but significant correlations between G_mean and AVQI and two AVQI parameters, smoothed cepstral peak prominence and harmonic-to-noise ratio (r = 0.27; --0.24; -0.20, respectively; |P < 0.05); and between total VHI and AVQI score and cepstral peak prominence (r = 0.21; 0.20, respectively; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the AVQI scores differed significantly between the groups with a VHI total score <19 and ≥19.

CONCLUSIONS

AVQI did not differentiate between voices that had been perceptually judged as normal or slightly abnormal, but a combination of perceptual assessment in the form of AVQI and VHI could better screen slightly deviant voices.

GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem

OBJECTIVE

To propose a single qualifier scale for voice problems based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) that classifies a voice problem considering its multidimensionality.

METHOD

A multicultural database was analyzed (280 subjects). The analyzed information was: the perceptual judgment of the overall voice quality (G); the acoustic analysis (A) with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index; the laryngeal diagnosis (L) and the patient self-assessment (P) using the Voice Handicap Index. The variables were categorized. A 2-step cluster analysis was performed to define groups with common characteristics.

RESULTS

A 7-point qualifier scale, the GALP, was defined to generally classify levels of voice problems considering 4 dimensions of the voice evaluation. Each level of voice problem, that is, no problem, mild, moderate, severe, or complete voice problem, has its own possible outcome for G, A, L, and P that will change, or not, the overall level of voice problem. The extremes of the scale represent "no problem" at all when all parameters are normal, and "complete problem" when all parameters are altered. The 3 levels in between were defined by the cluster analysis (mild, moderate, and severe problem) and change according to the outcome of each evaluation (G, A, L, and P). Thus, changes in one parameter alone may or not contribute to the change of the level of voice problem. Also, there are 2 categories for cases that do not fit the classification (not specified) and for which some of the variables are missing (not applicable).

CONCLUSION

The GALP scale was proposed to classify the level of voice problem. This approach considers important dimensions of voice evaluation according to the ICF. It is a potential tool to be used by different professionals, with different assessment procedures, and among different populations, clinicians, and study centers.

Acoustic Breathiness Index for the Japanese-Speaking Population: Validation Study and Exploration of Affecting Factors

Objectives The purposes of this study were to validate the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) for the Japanese-speaking population and to determine whether it is independent of factors such as sex, age, and perceptual ratings of roughness. Method First, the concurrent validity of the ABI for perceptual breathiness was evaluated on the concatenations of continuous speech and sustained vowels from 288 patients with varying degrees of dysphonia. The diagnostic accuracy was examined on 343 samples with 55 additional normophonic speakers. Second, the validity related to responsiveness-to-change was estimated on 222 samples obtained before and after interventions for 111 voice-disordered patients. Third, the relationships between the ABI and other variables (i.e., perceptual hoarseness/breathiness/roughness, sex, and age) were explored using bivariate and multivariate analyses for the 288 patients. Results First, the concurrent validity and the responsiveness-to-change validity were confirmed by strong correlation coefficients of .890 and .878, respectively. Second, the receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the area under the curve to be 0.939, indicating excellent accuracy. The ABI of 3.44 exhibited a sensitivity of 76.3% and a specificity of 94.1%. Third, although bivariate analyses revealed a weak relationship between ABI and roughness and an ABI difference by age, multiple regression analyses showed a strong relation between only ABI and breathiness, without a meaningful contribution from roughness, sex, and age factors. Conclusion The study confirmed that the ABI is an accurate and specific tool to estimate breathiness levels in the Japanese-speaking population and neither roughness, sex, nor age significantly affects the ABI.

A Case of Specificity: How Does the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Perform in Normophonic Subjects?

The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a multiparametric tool based on six acoustic measurements to quantify overall voice quality in an objective manner, with the smoothed version of the cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) as its main contributor. In the last decade, many studies demonstrated its robust diagnostic accuracy and high sensitivity to voice changes across voice therapy in different languages. The aim of the present study was to provide information regarding AVQI’s and CPPS’s performance in normophonic non-treatment-seeking subjects, since these data are still scarce; concatenated voice samples, consisting of sustained vowel phonation and continuous speech, from 123 subjects (72 females, 51 males; between 20 and 60 years old) without vocally relevant complaints were evaluated by three raters and run in AVQI v.02.06. According to this auditory-perceptual evaluation, two cohorts were set up (normophonia versus slight perceived dysphonia). First, gender effects were investigated. Secondly, between-cohort differences in AVQI and CPPS were investigated. Thirdly, with the number of judges giving G = 1 to partition three sub-levels of slight hoarseness as an independent factor, differences in AVQI and CPPS across these sub-levels were investigated; for AVQI, no significant gender effect was found, whereas, for CPPS, significant trends were observed. For both AVQI and CPPS, no significant differences were found between normophonic and slightly dysphonic subjects. For AVQI, however, this difference did approach significance; these findings emphasize the need for a normative study with a greater sample size and subsequently greater statistical power to detect possible significant effects and differences.

Acoustic Voice Quality Index - AVQI para o português brasileiro: análise de diferentes materiais de fala

RESUMO Objetivo Verificar a melhor amostra de fala para validação do AVQI para o português-brasileiro; identificar o contexto de fala com melhor correlação perceptivo-acústica e que possui maior acurácia diagnóstica com o AVQI. Método Gravações de 50 sujeitos (disfônicos e vocalmente saudáveis), incluindo: vogal/a/; meses do ano; números (1 a 20) e repetição das frases do CAPE-V. As amostras de fala foram editadas para conter três diferentes durações mais vogal: D1-fala completa; D2-fala com 3s de segmentos sonoros; D3-fala com ponto de corte pré-determinado. Três avaliadores realizaram a análise perceptivoauditiva (APA) das amostras combinadas em 3 contextos seguidos da vogal e deram um único escore do desvio vocal (G:0 a 3). Verificou-se qual estímulo de fala possuía melhor correlação perceptivo-acústica considerando o Gmédio; analisou-se qual estímulo possuía melhor acurácia diagnóstica considerando como presença ou ausência G<0,5 e G<0,68. Resultados A correlação perceptivo-acústica variou de r = 0,482 a r = 0,634 (Correlação de Spearman); números apresentou os valores mais elevados. O AVQI foi altamente específico e pouco sensível. Considerando G<0,5, a melhor sensibilidade e valor da curva ROC foi para frases em D3 (0,578;0,72). Considerando G<0,68, houve boa acurácia diagnóstica para números de 1 a 10 e maior sensibilidade para números de 1 a 20. Conclusão Melhor correlação perceptivo-acústica foi para números, 1 a 10. As frases do CAPE-V produziram melhor acurácia diagnóstica com G<0,5, números apresentou elevada acurácia diagnóstica com G<0,68. Números é bastante usual na clínica brasileira, logo, sugere-se seu uso para validação e análises do AVQI.

Latoszek B. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language

Objective:

The aim of this study was to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index 03.01 (AVQIv3) and the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) in the Spanish language.

Method:

Concatenated voice samples of continuous speech (cs) and sustained vowel (sv) from 136 subjects with dysphonia and 47 vocally healthy subjects were perceptually judged for overall voice quality and breathiness severity. First, to reach a higher level of ecological validity, the proportions of cs and sv were equalized regarding the time length of 3 seconds sv part and voiced cs part, respectively. Second, concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy were verified.

Results:

A moderate reliability of overall voice quality and breathiness severity from 5 experts was used. It was found that 33 syllables as standardization of the cs part, which represents 3 seconds of voiced cs, allows the equalization of both speech tasks. A strong correlation was revealed between AVQIv3 and overall voice quality and ABI and perceived breathiness severity. Additionally, the best diagnostic outcome was identified at a threshold of 2.28 and 3.40 for AVQIv3 and ABI, respectively.

Conclusions:

The AVQIv3 and ABI showed in the Spanish language valid and robust results to quantify abnormal voice qualities regarding overall voice quality and breathiness severity.