Endoscopic and Phoniatric Evaluation in Singing Students

Pre- and post-operative voice therapy for benign vocal fold lesions: protocol for a non-randomised, multicentre feasibility trial with embedded process evaluation

BACKGROUND

Management of benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs) is variable with individuals receiving surgery, voice therapy, or a combination of these approaches. Some evidence suggests that the best outcomes may be achieved when patients are offered pre- and post-operative voice therapy in addition to phonosurgery, but what constitutes pre- and post-operative voice therapy is poorly described. The pre- and post-operative voice therapy (PAPOV) intervention has been developed and described according to the TIDieR checklist and Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) for voice. The PAPOV intervention is delivered by specialist speech and language therapists trained in the intervention and comprises 7 essential and 4 additional components, delivered in voice therapy sessions with patients who are having surgery on their vocal folds for removal of BVFLs.

STUDY DESIGN

Non-randomised, multicentre feasibility trial with embedded process evaluation.

METHOD

Forty patients from two sites who are due to undergo phonosurgery will be recruited to receive the PAPOV intervention. Measures of feasibility, including recruitment, retention, and adherence, will be assessed. The feasibility of gathering clinical and cost effectiveness data will be measured pre-treatment, then at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. An embedded process evaluation will be undertaken to explain feasibility findings.

DISCUSSION

This study will assess the feasibility of delivering a described voice therapy intervention protocol to patients who are undergoing surgery for removal of BVFLs. Findings will be used to inform the development and implementation of a subsequent effectiveness trial, should this be feasible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been prospectively registered on ISRCTN (date 4th January 2023), registration number 17438192, and can be viewed here: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17438192 .

Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms, Dysphonia, and Vocal Tract Discomfort in Amateur Choir Singers

INTRODUCTION

Vocal tract discomfort (VTD), dysphonia, and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms are complaints frequently reported by amateur singers. There are two aims of this study. The first is to evaluate the prevalence of these symptoms using validated questionnaires. The second is to correlate singing-related variables with the questionnaire responses.

METHODS

A total of 392 amateur choir singers (ACS) and 514 control subjects completed an online survey divided into four parts: (1) clinical and demographic characteristics, (2) training in singing and singing experience, (3) history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and LPR symptoms, (4) validated questionnaires. Specifically, the reflux symptom index (RSI), the vocal tract discomfort scale (VTDS), and the voice symptom scale (VoiSS) were included to analyze the actual burden related to LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia.

RESULTS

ACS demonstrated a healthier lifestyle and a lower prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in comparison with control subjects. ACS scored significantly higher in VTDS and VoiSS than control subjects, while no differences in the RSI results were found. Significant correlations among the questionnaires' results were demonstrated. Occasional professional singing was the variable influencing VTDS and VoiSS results the most.

CONCLUSION

ACS do not evidently manifest a higher impairment connected to LPR (RSI score), while they do report higher levels of voice (VoiSS score) and vocal tract (VTDS score) impairments, in comparison with control subjects. The relevant correlations among the PRO measures suggest that LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia are related to each other. Given the relevant repercussion on the severity of VTD and dysphonia, providers should specifically ask about occasional professional singing when treating amateur singers.

Assessment of Subjective and Objective Voice Analysis According to Types of Sulcus Vocalis

INTRODUCTION

Sulcus vocalis (SV) subtypes are difficult to diagnose. Non-invasive techniques are sometimes not feasible in the diagnosis. The study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of objective and subjective voice analysis combined with videolaryngostroboscopic examination (VLS) in the diagnosis of SV types.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study that includes patients who presented to Phoniatric outpatient clinic with complaints related to voice and diagnosed with SV on VLS examination between 2017-2020. The SV type was determined based on VLS findings and the patients were categorized into respective groups. Between- and within-group assessment of objective and subjective voice analysis of SV types was conducted.

RESULTS

47 patients were included in the study; Type I, Type II, Type III SV patients were 16, 17, and 14 in number, respectively. Fundamental frequency (F0) and Shimmer (%) values were significantly high in Type II and III SV cases, whereas the Maximum Phonation Time (MPT) was significantly low. GRBAS, Voice Handicap Index -10 (VHI-10), Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scores were statistically significantly high in pathological SV and Voice Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) scores were low. A moderate correlation between VHI-10 and V-RQOL and between RSI and V-RQOL was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective and subjective voice analysis in Type II and III SV show a significant difference compared to Type I SV. The use of objective and subjective voice analysis combined with VLS examination can be helpful in the diagnosis of SV types.

Seeing Voices: A Dynamic, Interprofessional Approach to Teaching Performing Arts and Speech-Language Pathology Students About Vocal Anatomy and Physiology

OBJECTIVES

Seeing Voices was an interprofessional, technology-enabled, large-scale, teaching and learning event developed to address the need to improve voice students' knowledge of laryngeal anatomy and physiology toward understanding and maintaining vocal health. Seeing Voices trialed a novel interprofessional educational approach, collected both quantitative and qualitative data about student experiences of laryngostroboscopic examination, and built a databank of laryngeal recordings for future student learning.

METHODS

Seeing Voices involved two 3-hour seminars in a large, university lecture space, run by an interprofessional team (speech-language pathologists, vocal coach, Ear Nose and Throat consultant) with quality equipment projecting laryngeal images to large screens with expert commentary in real time. Participants were 18 students who volunteered for laryngeal examination (9 per seminar) and student attendees (n = 175) from performing arts courses (classical singing, contemporary, jazz, musical theater, acting) and a speech-language pathology course. A quantitative evaluation of knowledge gained was undertaken using a Qualtrics survey. Results from pre (n = 175; performing arts = 120; speech-language pathology (SLP) = 55) and postevent (n = 99; performing arts = 56; SLP = 43) questionnaires were received from the students who attended. Interviews were collected from 15 of the 18 student volunteers about their experiences of nasendoscopic evaluation and data were analyzed using qualitative description and qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Quantitative results demonstrated a strong trend toward increased knowledge following attendance at the event across year cohorts for both student groups. Qualitative interviews highlighted the value in seeing multiple examples of normal laryngeal functioning across different vocal techniques in real time. For those undertaking nasendoscopic examination, simultaneously seeing and feeling laryngeal maneuvers used in training appeared to promote understanding of their own vocal mechanism and the purpose of different vocal techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Seeing Voices offers a novel way to improve interprofessional collaboration, and engagement with, and understanding of, laryngeal anatomy and vocal health by students in performing arts and speech-language pathology courses.

Development of a New Self-Assessment Tool for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Screening in Singers (SVHI-12-LPR)

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to develop a new tool for the evaluation of singers with self-reported symptoms suggestive of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) (the SVHI-12-LPR), by correlating RSI with SVHI in a population sample of 163 subjects (both professional and amateur singers), evaluated also by videolaryngostroboscopy. This study was a cross-sectional, double-observational study.

METHODS

RSI and SVHI were administered to 159 singers (amateurs, singing students, and professional singers). All subjects underwent videolaryngostroboscopy to objectively identify four subgroups: normal subjects (41.5%), subjects with organic lesions occupying the glottic space (17.6%), subjects with functional dysphonia (18.2%), and subjects presenting solely signs suggestive of LPR (22.6%). Using the validated RSI threshold, 33.9% of participants presented an RSI total score >13, suggestive of LPR.

RESULTS

Subjects with a suspected diagnosis of LPR at videolaryngostroboscopy presented a mean RSI significantly higher than other subgroups (p < 0.001). Moreover, the SVHI-36 score did not statistically differ between pathological subgroups. A significant positive relationship was observed between RSI and SVHI total score (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.474, p < 0.001). 12 SVHI items (items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 20, 24, 25, 26, 30) showed a significant association with RSI pathology classification. Statistical analysis demonstrated for the 12 selected items (SVHI-12-LPR) acceptable specificity (0.691) and sensibility (0.833) for the suspected diagnosis of LPR with a cut-off of 15.

CONCLUSIONS

From the SVHI-36, 12 items were extracted that correlated with the specific impact that LPR has on the singer's voice (SVHI-12-LPR), as evaluated by RSI and videolaryngostroboscopy. Such questionnaire represents a new tool that could be applied to singers with symptoms suggestive of LPR to select which patients would benefit from a further phoniatric and videolaryngostroboscopic evaluation.

Voice and Lifestyle Behaviors of Student Singers: Impact of History Gathering Method on Self-Reported Data

OBJECTIVES

This study described voice use and lifestyle information about student singers with a focus on describing differences in self-reported information at study intake compared to data from 21 consecutive days of a voice Log.

METHODS

Twenty-seven student singers estimated voice and lifestyle behaviors at study initiation including daily speaking time, singing/performance time, vocal warm-up, and cool-down minutes; fluid intake; perceived effort when talking, and when singing, among other items. These same parameters were tracked for 21 consecutive days in a voice log kept by the singer at home. Study intake data was compared to the median estimates from the 21-day voice log on each variable using nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

Student singers reported warming up the voice regularly at study intake (100%), but several logged ≥ 7 days out of 21 without warming up even though all days had singing minutes. Less than half reported voice cool downs at intake, and even fewer logged minutes of cool down in the daily tracking. High occupational voice demands not involving singing were reported by 37%. Large percentages of students reported frustration (63%), worry/anxiety (41%), and depression (26%) regarding their voice in the prior 2 weeks. Estimates at study intake statistically overestimated daily speaking minutes, effort during singing and number of nights eating within 2 hours of sleep compared to the 3-week log.

CONCLUSION

Student singers reported several voice use and behavior items that could impact vocal health. Additionally, how the information was obtained (intake estimate vs. daily log) did alter what was reported for some parameters.

Extreme Vocals-A Retrospective Longitudinal study of Vocal Health in 20 Professional Singers Performing and Teaching Rough Vocal Effects

BACKGROUND

Rough vocal effects, extreme, or extended vocal techniques to sound intentionally hoarse or rough are an integral part of many genres and styles, and research has recently demonstrated the involvement of supraglottic narrowing and vibrations to produce such sounds. The vocal health of singing with rough vocal effects is poorly documented, especially in a longitudinal manner, while much vocal pedagogy continuously treats the sounds as harming to or dangerous for the vocal mechanism.

OBJECTIVE

To longitudinally investigate the vocal health of professional singers who perform the five rough-sounding vocal effects Distortion, Growl, Grunt, Rattle, and Creaking as part of their singing and teaching.

METHODS

Twenty singers underwent nasoendoscopic examination, filled in SVHI questionnaires, and were assessed by GRBAS with a 14-year interval in a retrospective longitudinal study (from 2007 to 2021). Endoscopic materials were assessed by Reflux Finding Score and a hybrid version of the Stroboscopy Rating Scale.

RESULTS

Singers presented at initiation of study with an average SVHI of 9.2 (±9), which decreased at time of follow up 14 years later to an average of 5.12 (±6). Laryngeal assessments (RFS and SRS) revealed low averages at initiation of study as well as at conclusion of the study with only small fluctuations in averages, with findings mainly relating to arytenoid asymmetry.

CONCLUSION

The participating singers perform and teach rough vocal effects continually and present with healthy laryngeal mechanisms and within-normal SVHI and GRBAS scores. The findings suggest that controlled supraglottic narrowing and techniques to allow for supraglottic structures to engage in vibration as an additional noise source can be performed sustainable and in a healthy manner if performed with correct vocal technique.

Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI) in Singing Students: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

To correlate, RSI with SVHI, in a group of singing students, by means of a specific anamnestic questionnaire which analyzes the physical, social, emotional, and economic impacts of voice problems on their lives. This study is a cross-sectional single-center observational study.

METHODS

Forty-two modern singing students (26F/16M; average age: 24.9 ± 5.7; range: 16-46 years old) were recruited. A self-assessment of the singing-voice (SVHI) and of reflux symptom (RSI) was performed.

RESULTS

Using the validated RSI threshold, 31% of participants were classified as RSI greater than 13 as an indication of suspected LPR. Classifying the SVHI score as proposed in the recent literature (cutoff of 20.35) our sample was a voice disorders prevalence of 71.4%. There was no significant positive or negative relationship between RSI and SVHI total score (rho = 0.238, P = 0.13). Instead, by considering the relationship between the individual items of the two questionnaires, it is highlighted that the item 1 of SVHI was significantly correlated with most of the RSI items (P = 0.0001-0.006). In the same vein, the item 5 of SVHI was correlated to hoarseness and coughing (P = 0.005-0.006). The item 20 of SVHI was significantly correlated with hoarseness, excess mucus in the throat or postnasal drip and with the pharyngeal Globus sensation (P = 0.001-0.005). By aggregating the SVHI item response as a positive response (2-4) versus a negative response (0 or 1) between "RSI pathology classification," a significant association was observed for SVHI item 1 (P < 0.021), item 5 (P < 0.006), item 20 (P < 0.042), item 24 (P < 0.044) item 25 (P < 0.047). These associations were confirmed by univariate binary logistic. Multivariate binary logistic regression confirms that SVHI Item 1, Item 5 were more associated with RSI positive. Based on results, we propose a questionnaire that combines the most relevant SVHI items correlated to LPRD (SVHI-10-LPRD questionnaire). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 10 items selected was 0.87; item-total correlation coefficients for each item were in the range of 0.461 to 0.670.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study shows that, in case of significant RSI for LPR, it is possible to observe a significant association with some symptoms described in SVHI. These results underline that the association of the RSI and SVHI questionnaires administered to singers and singing students, can represent a simple screening to reveal possible alterations of the singing voice correlate to LPR. Moreover, we propose a Singing Voice Handicap Index correlated to LPR (SVHI-10-LPRD). It will be necessary to increase the sample of subjects in the study to confirm these preliminary data.

Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and benign vocal folds lesions: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in the development of benign lesions of the vocal folds (BLVF).

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched by three independent investigators for articles published between January 1990 and November 2018 providing substantial information about the role of LPR in the development of nodules, polyps, cysts, Reinke's edema, and sulcus vocalis. Inclusion, exclusion, diagnostic criteria and clinical outcome evaluation of included studies were analyzed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 155 relevant publications, 42 studies were included. Thirty-five were clinical studies and seven were experimental research studying the impact of reflux on vocal fold tissue. Only seven clinical studies utilized objective LPR diagnoses (pH monitoring), suggesting an association between LPR and the development of nodules, polyps, and Reinke's edema. These studies were characterized by a substantial heterogeneity due to discrepancies in inclusion/exclusion criteria, diagnostic methods, and clinical outcome evaluation. The few basic science studies on this topic support that LPR creates an environment that may predispose to BLVF through changes in defense mechanisms of the vocal folds, cell-to-cell dehiscence, inflammatory reaction of the vocal folds, and reaction to phonotrauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Caustic mucosal injury from LPR could cause increased susceptibility of the vocal fold mucosa to injury and subsequent formation of nodules, polyps, or Reinke's edema. However, the heterogeneity and the low number of high-quality studies limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Future clinical and experimental studies are needed to better identify the role of reflux in development of BLVF. Laryngoscope, 129:E329-E341, 2019.