Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)

The Effect of An Indirect Voice Therapy Approach on the Voice of Children With Vocal Fold Nodules: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of a combination indirect voice therapy approach on the management of vocal nodules in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study with thirty children (24 males and 6 females; mean age 8.8 ± 2.2) with a diagnosis of vocal fold nodule (VFN) was conducted. All participants were included in an 8-week voice therapy program consisting of vocal hygiene education and parental rule-setting. Videolaryngoscopic examination, auditory-perceptual evaluation, and acoustic voice analysis were performed immediately before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

The comparison of videolaryngoscopic findings before and after the therapy revealed that the size of the nodules decreased significantly (P < 0.001). Findings from the laryngeal examination showed that the vast majority of children 73.3% (n = 22) had no VFN anymore after the intervention. The auditory-perceptual evaluation showed that overall severity of dysphonia decreased significantly [from 50 (40-70) to 38 (30-45), P < 0.001]. Jitter local (P = 0.031) and Jitter local abs (P = 0.043) parameters statistically differed after the therapy. There were not any statistically significant differences for mean F0, shimmer local (%), shimmer local (dB), and mean HNR.

CONCLUSIONS

The voice therapy method in this study has a clear benefit on the voice of children with VFN and can be used in clinical practice. Specifically, clinicians should consider the parents as a core component of voice therapies and pay attention to vocal hygiene education for optimal management of VFN related childhood dysphonia.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V): A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) is a widely used perceptual evaluation scale for voice assessment. It is adapted in many regional languages worldwide. This systematic review will help critically evaluate the methodologies used to adapt and establish CAPE-V as a valid and reliable tool.

METHOD

Authors reviewed literature in search engines (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed) to identify studies published in English between 2002-2020. The CAPE-V translated and adapted for linguistic or cultural variations were included for the review. The studies were compiled using the Mendeley Reference Manager and screened for title/abstract before shortlisting the studies.

RESULTS

The initial database had 3459 search results and after duplicates removal, 1535 articles were analysed. Thirteen studies were narrowed based on title/abstract screening. A final of ten studies were selected for the review.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This review provided a comprehensive understanding of the challenges encountered during cross-cultural adaptation and will help future researchers choose a suitable adaptation method.

Exploring the Relationship Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-Perception of Voice in Trans Women

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the strength and direction of the relationship between spectral cepstral-based, time-based acoustic measures and the self-perception of voice in trans women.

METHODS

Forty-eight trans women were included in the study. Analysis of the sustained vowel phonation was performed using Multidimensional Voice Profile Analysis (MDVP), and spectral-cepstral analyses of the sustained vowel phonation, all-voiced weighted sentence, and spontaneous speech were made via Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) software. For self-perceptual evaluations, the Trans Woman Voice Questionnaire (TWVQ) and the Self-perception of Voice Femininity Scale (SPVF) were used. The correlation between MDVP, spectral-cepstral parameters, and TWVQ and SPVF scores was calculated.

RESULTS

The present study found a positive relationship between F0, SPVF, and TWVQ. Among the perturbation parameters, the jitter was the only one found to correlate with SPVF and TWVQ. The CPPF0 parameter was found to be associated with a more feminine voice perception and a higher voice-related quality of life in all speech samples in the present study. In addition, higher CPP values achieved from vowel phonation were associated with less feminine voice perception and lower voice-related quality of life. The present study also suggests a weak correlation with the SPVF and Cepstral Peak Prominence Standard Deviation (CPPF0 SD) of the spontaneous speech sample in a negative direction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found weak and moderate levels of correlations between F0, jitter (%), CPP, CPPF0, CPPF0 SD parameters, and self-perceptual measures. These findings suggested that such a level of relationship is attributable to the fact that these tools evaluate different aspects of voice in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning System. According to this pioneering study, it would be beneficial to incorporate spectral-cepstral measures into the objective assessment protocol for trans women's voices.

Development and Validation of the Bilingual Catalan/Spanish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable bilingual version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) for the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice in Catalan and Spanish speakers.

METHOD

The development of this CAPE-V adaptation included Delphi methodology with 20 voice and speech experts reaching consensus on the optimal adapted terminology of the perceptual vocal attributes, considering also input from the original instrument authors. The adaptation and validation of vocal tasks followed a sequential validation procedure, with input from phoneticians and speech-language pathologists. Following pilot testing with a large sample of speech-language pathology students, a refined adapted version was empirically tested for validity and reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing the adapted CAPE-V with the reference Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain scale. Construct validity was assessed through convergent and discriminant validity analysis. Intrarater and interrater reliability were assessed via intraclass correlation coefficient calculations. User experience was evaluated through a questionnaire. Scale properties were validated using a confusion matrix, and cutoff values were calculated to achieve the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Through a formalized consensus process, optimal Catalan/Spanish terminology was determined for the perceptual attributes of voice present in the CAPE-V. An adapted protocol of tasks was obtained that preserves the objectives of the original instrument and the relevance of the phonetic criteria in the target languages. The results demonstrated concurrent validity, construct validity, and intrarater reliability. Interrater reliability was found to depend on the extent to which evaluators shared their internal standards. The raters identified CAPE-V as an effective and preferred instrument.

CONCLUSION

An adapted, validated version of the CAPE-V is made available to clinical professionals for the evaluation of voice in Catalan and Spanish speakers.

French-Language Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to adapt the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) protocol for perceptual voice assessment to the French language. The primary objective was to achieve consensus among an international panel of voice experts on the content of the adapted protocol.

METHODS

To ensure the relevance and robustness of the French CAPE-V protocol, this study employed a systematic Delphi method and involved an international panel primarily comprising speech therapists and lecturers from France and Belgium. The multi-stage process included an initial panel size of 15 experts. Three rounds of online questionnaires, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data collection, were conducted. Participants provided feedback and ratings on various protocol elements until a consensus was reached. Adaptations targeted the choice of task stimuli (sustained vowel, sentence reading, semi-spontaneous speech), of the rating scales, and vocal quality terminology.

RESULTS

The Delphi process achieved consensus on all elements of the adapted CAPE-V protocol. Notably, the sustained vowel task saw consensus in favor of the vowel /a/. Sentence adaptations achieved substantial agreement, with the final set unanimously approved. The simple Visual Analog Scale emerged as the preferred rating scale. Agreement on terms for describing vocal qualities marked a crucial step in establishing a shared vocabulary among French-speaking voice experts.

CONCLUSIONS

The study successfully adapted the CAPE-V protocol for perceptual voice assessment to the French language through a systematic Delphi process. The final protocol closely resembles the original English version, maintaining its structure and core objectives. Consensus on sustained vowel tasks, sentence adaptations, rating scales, and vocal quality terminology indicates the relevance and robustness of the adapted protocol. Ongoing validation studies in France demonstrate the potential clinical utility of the adapted CAPE-V in French-speaking contexts, representing a significant step toward standardized and validated voice assessment tools for clinicians and researchers globally.

Investigation of the Cepstral Spectral Acoustic Analysis for Classifying the Severity of Dysphonia

OBJECTIVES

The advantages of cepstral measurements in the evaluation of dysphonia have been noted in previous studies. However, there is an unclarity regarding the results of cepstral analyzes effect in determining the severity of dysphonia. The aims of this study were to determine the cut-off values of cepstral peak prominence, cepstral peak prominence standard deviation, low frequency/ high frequency ratio, low frequency/high frequency ratio standard deviation, and cepstral spectral index of dysphonia for predicting the voice severity within a Turkish speaking population, as well as to confirm the discriminative power of these cut-off values.

MATERIALS METHODS

One hundred ninety-five individuals with voice disorders and an equal number of age and gender-matched individuals without voice disorders were included. Included subjects had visited the Hacettepe University Hospitals Speech and Language Therapy Department for voice evaluation between January 2017 and September 2021. The voice recordings from all participants included the six CAPE-V/Turkish sentences and sustained vowel /a/. Three raters provided auditory perceptual ratings of the voice samples using the GRBAS scale (grade) and overall severity for the CAPE-V/Turkish. Participants were categorized into normal and mild, moderate, and severely dysphonic groups based on the auditory perceptual evaluation. Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) software was used for cepstral spectral acoustic analysis.

RESULTS

In the sustained vowel context, the area under the curve (ROC) for the CSID value was >0.8, except for mild vs. moderate dysphonia groups. In connected speech contexts, the ROC of the CPP value was also >0.8, except for normal vs. mild dysphonia groups. The cut-off values of CPP and CSID demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for predicting voice severities.

CONCLUSION

The cut-off values for the parameters that predicted voice severities showed a significant degree of discriminative power for categorizing voice severities among Turkish-speaking people.

Development and Validation of Sentences in Tamil for Psychoacoustic Evaluation of Voice Using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

PURPOSE

The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) is a standardized instrument used in voice assessment to assess voice quality. It has been translated and culturally adapted in several languages. This study aimed at developing and validating a Tamil version of CAPE-V through auditory perceptual evaluation of remotely recorded voice samples.

METHOD

The Tamil version was adapted with permission from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association to match the rationale in English CAPE-V. The sentences were constructed by the first author and validated for content by two panels of experts. Forty-five participants (15 cases and 30 controls) were included in the study. Data recording was conducted online (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., app) for all samples. Three raters participated in the auditory evaluation and scored all samples using Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain (GRBAS) scale followed by CAPE-V with a week gap in between. Twenty percent of samples were repeated to assess intrarater reliability. The intrarater and interrater reliability measures for Tamil CAPE-V were established using intraclass coefficients (ICCs). To ensure construct validity, group differences were determined between the cases and controls. The concurrent validity was established by correlating Tamil CAPE-V with the GRBAS scale.

RESULTS

The intrarater reliability for Tamil CAPE-V ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC: .610-.998). The Tamil CAPE-V obtained moderate to good interrater reliability for all parameters (ICC: .525-.790) except pitch (ICC: .405). The differences between the cases and controls were statistically significant (p < .01). The correlation between CAPE-V and GRBAS was strong for overall severity, breathiness, and strain (r _s = .725-.861) and moderate for roughness (r _s = .678).

CONCLUSION

The Tamil CAPE-V is a reliable and valid tool for auditory perceptual evaluation in Tamil-speaking populations.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21513885.

Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Into Malay: A Validity Study

Auditory-perceptual rating of voice is one component of voice evaluation, and the CAPE-V is one of the tools for this purpose. Because of its advantages, the CAPE-V has been adapted into several languages. Accordingly, the adaptation of the CAPE-V into Malay is essential for its utility among the Malaysian population, which this study aimed to accomplish. This study involved translating the CAPE-V into Malay, termed the Malay CAPE-V, followed by establishing its validity. The translation processes (ie, forward translation and backward translation) involved four different translators ie, three speech-language therapists (SLTs), and one linguist with at least 14 years of experience. Most items were similarly translated, except for a few, which were subsequently accepted as similar, following consensus among the translators. In the examination of content validity, two raters (ie, SLTs) with at least 12 years of clinical experience reviewed and scored the tested items. Given that the scale-level content validity index average value (S-CVI/Ave) was above the acceptable level, all items were retained. The examination of construct validity and concurrent validity involved ratings of voice samples recorded from 38 participants, comprising 19 individuals with normal and disordered voices, respectively. The ratings were performed by three raters (ie, SLTs) with at least 12 years of clinical experience. For the construct validity, the Mann-Whitney U test indicated significantly higher scores of the vocal parameters of the Malay CAPE-V for the disordered voice group than for the normal voice group. Meanwhile, for the concurrent validity, the Spearman correlation indicated that all relationships between the scores of the vocal parameters of the Malay CAPE-V and GRBAS Scale were significant, with most of them achieving a very strong positive correlation. The results demonstrated that the Malay CAPE-V is a valid tool for an auditory-perceptual rating of voice among the Malaysian population.

Vocal outcomes after COVID-19 infection: acoustic voice analyses, durational measurements, self-reported findings, and auditory-perceptual evaluations

PURPOSE

The ongoing literature suggests that COVID-19 may have a potential impact on voice characteristics during the infection period. In the current study, we explored how the disease deteriorates different vocal parameters in patients who recovered from COVID-19.

METHODS

A total of 80 participants, 40 patients with a prior history of COVID-19 (20 male, 20 female) with a mean age of 39.9 ± 8.8 (range, 21-53) and 40 gender and age-matched healthy individuals (mean age, 37.3 ± 8.8; range, 21-54) were included to this study. The data of acoustic voice analyses, durational measurements, patient-reported outcomes, and auditory-perceptual evaluations were compared between the study group and the control group. Correlation analyses were conducted to examine the association between the clinical characteristics of the recovering patients and measured outcomes.

RESULTS

Maximum phonation time (MPT) and the scores of both Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) questionnaires significantly differed between the groups, which was more evident in female participants. The overall severity score of dysphonia was found to be higher in the study group than the control group (p = 0.023), but gender-based comparisons reached significance only in males (p = 0.032). VHI-10 and V-RQOL revealed significant correlations with the symptom scores of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a prior history of COVID-19 had significantly lower MPT, increased VHI-10 scores, decreased voice-related quality of life based on the V-RQOL questionnaire, and higher overall severity scores in the auditory-perceptual evaluation. Self-reported voice complaints disclosed close relationships with the symptom scores of COVID-19 disease.

Patient reported voice handicap and auditory-perceptual voice assessment outcomes in patients with COVID-19

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported voice handicap and auditory-perceptual measures of voice between healthy individuals and COVID-19 patients, as well as to investigate the effect of clinical factors on voice quality.

METHODS

COVID-19 patients (n = 138) and 90 healthy controls were included in the study. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was used to grade voice samples based on overall severity, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness. The Voice Handicap Index-10 was completed by all participants (VHI-10). Physical (pVHI), emotional (eVHI) and functional (fVHI) subscores were calculated. Clinical data were collected (disease stage, CT grade, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, CRP, and symptoms).

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference between patient and control groups in VHI-10 and CAPE-V scores was detected (p < 0.001). Except eVHI, total score and all subscale scores were higher in patients with COVID-19 as the pVHI was the most affected (η² = 0.324) subscale. All scores of CAPE-V were significantly worse in patients with COVID-19 as highest impact of COVID-19 was on breathiness (η² = 0.518). Pre-existing pulmonary comorbidity_, dyspnoea and N/L was significantly associated with the VHI-10 overall score (β_pc = 4.27, β_dyspnoea = 5.69 and β_nl = 0.25). The overall severity of CAPE-V was significantly dependent on dyspnoea and pulmonary comorbidity (β_dyspnoea = 11.25, β_pc = 10.12). VHI ≥4 and CAPE-V overall severity ≥11 were good indicators of COVID-19 related dysphonia.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 causes patient-reported voice handicap and deteriorates auditory-perceptual measures of voice. COVID-19 related voice impairment was mainly associated with the decreased respiratory capacity.

Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

PURPOSE

Auditory-perceptual evaluation is essential for the assessment of voice quality. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) provides a standardized protocol and assessment form for clinicians to analyze the voice quality and has been adapted into several different languages. The aims of this study were to develop the Japanese version of the CAPE-V and to investigate its reliability and validity.

METHOD

The Japanese CAPE-V consisted of the same three speech contexts (vowels, sentences, and conversation) as developed in the original English version. The sentences were designed according to the concepts of the original version and reviewed by Japanese phoneticians. To validate the usefulness of the Japanese CAPE-V, voices of 173 Japanese-speaking subjects (76 subjects with dysphonia and 97 without voice complaints) were evaluated by five experienced judges, according to the Japanese CAPE-V as well as the GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) scale.

RESULTS

The Japanese CAPE-V provided a high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] > .85 for all the parameters) as well as a high intrarater reliability (ICCs > .85 for all the parameters). In addition, overall severity, roughness, and breathiness in the Japanese CAPE-V were highly correlated with the corresponding dimensions in the GRBAS scale, having Spearman correlation coefficients greater than .8.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the reliability and validity of the newly developed Japanese CAPE-V as an auditory-perceptual evaluation instrument.

Development, Validation, and Reliability of the Teacher-Reported Pediatric Voice Handicap Index

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a novel teacher-reported pediatric voice outcome measure and to investigate its psychometric properties.

METHOD

In the first stage, a new instrument, the Teacher-Reported Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (TRPVHI), was developed. After item generation, a panel of experts evaluated the items to assess the content validity. Subsequently, the final version of the preliminary instrument was applied to teachers of 306 children (57 dysphonic and 249 vocally healthy) between the ages of 4 and 11 years. Eventually, the construct validity, criterion-related validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the developed instrument were examined.

RESULTS

The items with a content validity ratio less than .8 were modified or removed, and accordingly, the preliminary version of the index was finalized. After the application of the preliminary version, item reduction was made based on the factor analysis. The index is composed of 27 questions and three subscales: Functional, Physical, and Emotional. A significant difference was observed between the dysphonic and vocally healthy children for the TRPVHI scores (p < .001). A positive moderate correlation was determined between the Pediatric Voice Handicap Index and TRPVHI scores. Correlation coefficients between the test and retest scores of the TRPVHI were in the range of .92-.98. Cronbach's alpha values computed to assess the internal consistency were in the range of .94-.98.

CONCLUSIONS

The TRPVHI is the only valid and reliable teacher-reported outcome measure of the effects of voice disorders on children. It is anticipated that the deployment of the TRPVHI in conjunction with other subjective tools, both in the initial evaluation and the follow-up of the treatment results, will allow a better understanding of the physical, functional, and emotional effects of voice disorders on children. Furthermore, it can potentially lead further research to enable the use of the TRPVHI for screening purposes.

Investigating the cepstral acoustic characteristics of voice in healthy children

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the cepstral acoustic parameters that vary depending on age and gender in vocally healthy children, and to establish normative data for cepstral analysis.

BACKGROUND

Cepstral measurements are among the strongest predictors of auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice and differentiate between healthy and dysphonic voices. More spesificially, ceptral peak prominence is accepted to be as a strong acoustic predictor of breathiness and overall severity of dysphonia. Cepstral measures determine voice quality reliably not only in sustained vowel samples but also in running speech samples. Determining the parameters related to the acoustic profile of children with normal voices can lead us to a better understanding of the effect of changes in the larynx and vocal fold structure during growth and development. There is a limited number of norm studies examining the cepstral acoustic properties of pediatric voice. Determining norm-specific values and clinical guidelines of cepstral acoustics according to the age and gender in vocally healthy children are utmost important.

METHODS

A total of 160 vocally healthy children were divided into the following four age groups: Group-I included children within the age range of 4-7 years, Group-II included 7-11 years, Group-III 11-14 years, and Group-IV included children within the age range of 14-18 years. An equal number of male and female participants were assigned to each group. PENTAX Medical CSL Model 4500 was used for recording all tasks. For acoustic analysis, Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice were used.

RESULTS

Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP), Cepstral Peak Prominence Standard Deviation (CPP SD), and Low-To-High Spectral Ratio (L/H Ratio) increased with age. It is found that the CPP parameter of all-voiced sentences and nasal-weighted sentences increased with age in boys, while no significant pattern was observed in any sample for girls. For L/H ratio, it can be said that there is a general increase with age in all speech samples, except for the vowel-weighted and voiceless plosive sentence samples, evident especially in the group above the age of 15 years. This study concluded that the CPP SD parameter in the vowel-weighted sentences increased with age in boys. It was also noticed in this study that CPP F0 standard deviation (SD) intervals were narrower in vowel-weighted, easy onset, and voiceless plosive sentence samples than in all-voiced, hard glottal attack and nasal-weighted sentence samples.

CONCLUSION

This study established cepstral acoustic normative values for a wide age range of the pediatric population. It is thought that age and gender specific cepstral acoustic findings presented in this study contributed to the related literature. In addition, to our knowledge, this is the first study that provides a normative cepstral acoustic database of the CAPE-V/Turkish sentences in the pediatric population.

Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Into Hindi

Aim The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the reliability of a Hindi version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Reliability was assessed by comparing Hindi CAPE-V ratings with English CAPE-V ratings and by the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia and Strain (GRBAS) scale. Method Hindi sentences were created to match the phonemic load of the corresponding English CAPE-V sentences. The Hindi sentences were adapted for linguistic content. The original English and adapted Hindi CAPE-V and GRBAS were completed for 33 bilingual individuals with normal voice quality. Additionally, the Hindi CAPE-V and GRBAS were completed for 13 Hindi speakers with disordered voice quality. The agreement of CAPE-V ratings was assessed between language versions, GRBAS ratings, and two rater pairs (three raters in total). Pearson product-moment correlation was completed for all comparisons. Results A strong correlation (r > .8, p < .01) was found between the Hindi CAPE-V scores and the English CAPE-V scores for most variables in normal voice participants. A weak correlation was found for the variable of strain (r < .2, p = .400) in the normative group. A strong correlation (r > .6, p < .01) was found between the overall severity/grade, roughness, and breathiness scores in the GRBAS scale and the CAPE-V scale in normal and disordered voice samples. Significant interrater reliability (r > .75) was present in overall severity and breathiness. Conclusions The Hindi version of the CAPE-V demonstrates good interrater reliability and concurrent validity with the English CAPE-V and the GRBAS. The Hindi CAPE-V can be used for the auditory-perceptual voice assessment of Hindi speakers.

Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese CAPE-V Instrument-Br CAPE-V for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scale is a modern, clinical-scientific approach to voice analysis. It has been translated and culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese, but it still lacks validation.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Brazilian Portuguese version of the CAPE-V scale using the previously translated and culturally adapted version.

METHOD

Forty voice samples were selected (30 dysphonic, 10 nondysphonic), and the degree of vocal deviation was evaluated by a committee of three voice specialists. Nine voice specialists judged the 40 voice samples plus 20% repetition (total of 48 samples) using the CAPE-V. To ensure construct validity of the CAPE-V, its analysis was compared to the Grade-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain (GRBAS) scale that was performed 48-72 hours later. Finally, the intra- and inter-rater reliability values were verified and the correlation between the nine judges and the previously defined evaluation was analyzed.

RESULTS

The Brazilian CAPE-V presented significant intra (0.860-0.997) and inter-rater reliability values (0.707-0.964) for the overall degree and strong correlation with GRBAS (above 0.828). Deviant voice quality had greater consensus among raters than normal voices. A strong correlation was observed between the analysis of the nine raters and that of the committee.

CONCLUSION

CAPE-V is an important diagnostic instrument that contributes to the standardization of vocal quality evaluation in several languages, including Brazilian Portuguese. Thus, its usefulness is neither related to a single language nor to a single set of raters.

Investigating the effects of subthalamic Nucleus-Deep brain stimulation on the voice quality

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a standard surgical treatment method which is generally applied to subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's patients in cases where medical treatment is insufficient in treating the motor symptoms. It is known that Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS) treats many motor symptoms. However, the results of studies on speech and voice vary. The aim of the study is analysing the effect of STN-DBS on the characteristics of voice.Materials/methods: A total of 12 patients, (8 male-4 female) with an age average of 58.8 ± 9.6, who have been applied DBS surgery on STN included in the study. The voice recordings of the patients have been done prior to surgery and 6 months after the surgery. The evaluation of voice has been carried out through the instrumental method. The patients' voice recordings of the /a,e,i/ vowels have been done. The obtained recordings were evaluated by the Praat programme and the effects on jhitter, shimmer, fundamental frequency (F0) and noise harmonic rate (NHR) were analysed.Results: Numerical values of F0 of all female participants have been decreased for all of the vowels postoperatively. In the females; jhitter and fraction parameters were found to be significantly different (0.056 and 0.017, perspectively) for the vowel /e/. In addition, p values in the shimmer for vowels /e,i/ were thought to be clinically significant (.087, .079 and .076) respectively. All these changes in second measurements were found to indicate worsening vocal quality after the DBS in females. In males, there is not any significant difference observed between two measures in any of the parameters of any vowels.Conclusions: Acoustic voice quality deteriorated after STN-DBS predominantly for females however this deterioration was not prominent audio-perceptually. This finding commented as a result of the fact that that voice quality deviance of the participants was not severe.

Reliability and Validity of the Kannada Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Kannada version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Method The Kannada version of CAPE-V comprises six phrases that are phonetically designed as per the CAPE-V requirements. Sixty-five (21 individuals with dysphonia and 44 asymptomatic) participants were enrolled for the instrument psychometric validation. The interrater and intrarater reliability as well as validity were assessed. Results High level of agreement was noted between the three raters across all the CAPE-V parameters, highest for pitch (intraclass correlation coefficient value = .98) and lowest for loudness (intraclass correlation coefficient value = .96). High intrarater reliability agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient value > .97) was also noted for all the parameters. Among the correlation for parameters that are comparable between CAPE-V and the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain scale, the highest correlation was noted for overall severity. There was a significant difference noted between the study and control groups for all parameters except loudness. The discriminant function analysis and classification revealed that 98% were correctly identified. Conclusion The Kannada version of CAPE-V has been proven to be a psychometrically reliable and valid tool to use for auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice.

The Effects of Lee - Silverman Voice Treatment on Voice and Swallowing Functions in a Case with Bilateral Striopallidodentate Calcinosis

BACKGROUND

Bilateral striopallidodentate calcinosis (BSPDC) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder characterized by abnormal calcium accumulation in the basal ganglia, dentate nucleus, and semioval center. Speech, voice, and swallowing abnormalities can be associated with the disease. However, there are a limited number of studies regarding the speech and swallowing characteristics of this disease in the literature. Lee-Silverman voice therapy (LSVT-LOUD) is a structured speech therapy method that can be used to treat neurogenic conditions.

AIMS

The main purpose of this article was to document the effects of LSVT-LOUD on voice and swallowing functions in a case of BSPDC.

DESIGN

Case report.

METHODS

A comprehensive voice and swallowing evaluation, including objective methods, was conducted before therapy and at post-therapy follow-ups (FU) after 3 months and 6 months.

RESULTS

The voice and swallowing parameters were substantially improved at the 3-month FU; at the 6-month FU, the improvement in swallowing function was still preserved; however, the improvement in voice function had regressed.

CONCLUSION

LSVT-LOUD may improve the voice and swallowing functions of patients with BSPDC. However, long-term retention of the effects of LSVT-LOUD should be investigated in future studies.