1
|
Aghaei F. Comparison the Voice Onset Time (VOT) of Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Peers in the CAPE_V Sentences as Continues Speech Task. J Voice 2024:S0892-1997(24)00076-6. [PMID: 38679524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Auditory perception plays a crucial role in speech and language development, emphasizing concerns about hearing loss. While cochlear implantation (CI) nearly tackles challenges associated with postlingual hearing loss in adults, the importance of "auditory feedback" and acoustic assessment becomes crucial for evaluating speech disorders and devising effective treatments. This study aims to address the gap in assessing Voice Onset Time (VOT) as an indicator of nuanced variations in the speech of CI users during a continuous speech task. METHOD Recordings of Persian CAPE-V sentences were obtained from 25 CI users and 25 healthy speakers, with a mean age of 33.2years (SD=11.5, range=18-55years). Ten words, incorporating both voiced and voiceless consonants, were selected from the CAPE-V sentences. VOT measurements for the specified stop consonants at the initial syllables of these chosen words were computed using PRAAT. A comparative analysis between the two age- and gender-matched groups was conducted using an independent sample t test. Subsequently, ANCOVA was employed to examine the influence of demographic factors on VOT values among CI participants. RESULTS Unvoiced consonant /p/ in /po/, /pɑ/, /pe/, and /pa/ syllables had higher VOT values in the healthy group, while the voiced consonant /d/ in /da/ and /di/ syllables demonstrated higher VOT values in the CI group (P < 0.05). Apart from /po/ and /di/ syllables, no significant impacts of demographic factors on VOT values were observed (P ≥ 0.8). CONCLUSION Despite the improvement in speech quality after CI, subtle differences persist. The motor theory, which underscores the impact of auditory inputs on temporal coordination, highlights the role of VOT in speech discrimination. Various linguistic factors affect VOT, including articulation position, vowel context, and raised vowels. While CI enhances syllable distinction, challenges in articulation for adults suggest a need for targeted training in rehabilitation programs, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Aghaei
- Department of Speech Pathology, Paramedical Sciences School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frosolini A, Fantin F, Tundo I, Pessot N, Badin G, Bartolotta P, Vedovelli L, Marioni G, de Filippis C. Voice Parameters in Children With Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Voice 2023:S0892-1997(23)00021-8. [PMID: 36868956 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An intact auditory system is essential for the development and maintenance of voice quality and speech prosody. On the contrary hearing loss affects the adjustments and appropriate use of organs involved in speech and voice production. Spectro-acoustic voice parameters have been evaluated in Cochlear Implant (CI) users, and the authors of previous systematic reviews on the topic concluded that fundamental frequency (F0) seemed preliminarily the most reliable parameter to evaluate voice alterations in adult CI users. The main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to clarify the vocal parameters and prosodic alterations of speech in pediatric CI users. MATERIALS AND METHODS The protocol of the systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO database, International prospective register of systematic reviews. We conducted a search of the English literature published in the period between January 1, 2005 and April 1, 2022 on the Pubmed and Scopus databases. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the values of voice acoustic parameters in CI users and non-hearing-impaired controls. The analysis was conducted using the standardized mean difference as the outcome measure. A random-effects model was fitted to the data. RESULTS A total of 1334 articles were initially evaluated using title and abstract screening. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 20 articles were considered suitable for this review. The age of the cases ranged between 25 and 132 months at examination. The most studied parameters were F0, Jitter, Shimmer and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio (HNR); other parameters were seldom reported. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis of F0, with the majority of estimates being positive (75%); the estimated average standardized mean difference based on the random-effects model was 0.3033 (95% CI: 0.0605 to 0.5462; P = 0.0144). For Jitter (0.2229; 95% CI: -0.1862 to 0.7986; P = 0.2229) and shimmer (0.2540; 95% CI: -0.1404 to 0.6485; P = 0.2068) there was a trend toward positive values without reaching statistical significance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis confirmed that higher F0 values have been observed in the pediatric population of CI users compared to age-matched normal hearing volunteers, whereas the parameters of voice noise were not significantly different between cases and controls. Prosodic aspects of language need further investigations. In longitudinal contexts, prolonged auditory experience with CI has brought voice parameters closer to the norm. Following the available evidence, we stress the utility of inclusion of vocal acoustic analysis in the clinical evaluation and follow-up of CI patients to optimize the rehabilitation process of pediatric patients with hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Frosolini
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy; Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
| | - Francesco Fantin
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy
| | - Isabella Tundo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", ENT Section, A.O.U. Policlinico "G.Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Nicholas Pessot
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy
| | - Giulio Badin
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy; Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Patrizia Bartolotta
- Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, Unit of Biostatistics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Luca Vedovelli
- Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, Unit of Biostatistics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gino Marioni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Cosimo de Filippis
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|