Regarding: "A modified calculation of ankle-brachial pressure index is far more sensitive in the detection of peripheral arterial disease"

Automated photoplethysmography-based determination of ankle-brachial index: a validation study against Doppler sonography

INTRODUCTION

Determination of ankle-brachial-index (ABI) by manual Doppler is well established to screen for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) and to predict cardiovascular risk. A new generation of digital-controlled devices promises automated ABI determination. The aim of this study was to determine comparability of automated photoplethysmography (PPG)-derived ABI calculation with the Doppler-ABI algorithm commonly used in cohort studies.

METHODS

Automated PPG-based ABI measurements [Vascular Explorer (VE) and Vicorder (VI)] were recorded from 112 limbs of healthy subjects and 22 limbs of patients with confirmed LEAD. Validity was evaluated on the basis of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of clinical status and concordance with Doppler-ABI. Differences between cuff inflation [inf]- and deflation [def]-based method were studied in VE.

RESULTS

PPG-based ABI values were higher compared to Doppler-ABI (VI +0.06, VEinf +0.15, VEdef +0.09, p < 0.001, respectively). The difference was pronounced in pathological (<0.9), borderline (0.9-0.99) and low normal (1.0-1.09) ABI, but less in ABI ≥1.1. However, ROC analysis revealed excellent diagnostic value for LEAD (sensitivity/specificity) and comparable area under the curve at method-adapted ABI thresholds for all methods: Doppler (95/90 %, 0.95), VI (75/96 %, 0.91), VEinf (85/89 %, 0.93) and VEdef (80/98 %, 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Digital-controlled PPG-based ABI determination is a useful diagnostic application for LEAD. However, the systematic higher ABI in PPG-based measurement compared to Doppler and remarkable differences between the deflationary and inflationary method are critical for the interpretation of borderline and low normal ABI values where precise reading is essential to detect mild LEAD and subclinical disease and to predict cardiovascular risk.

The relevance of different methods of calculating the ankle-brachial index: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

The authors aimed to determine differences in the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and its associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, using different methods of calculating the ankle-brachial index (ABI). Using measurements taken in the bilateral brachial, dorsalis pedis, and posterior tibial arteries, the authors calculated ABI in 3 ways: 1) with the lowest ankle pressure (dorsalis pedis artery or posterior tibial artery) ("ABI-LO"), 2) with the highest ankle pressure ("ABI-HI"), and 3) with the mean of the ankle pressures ("ABI-MN"). For all 3 methods, the index ABI was the lower of the ABIs calculated from the left and right legs. PAD was defined as an ABI less than 0.90. Among 6,590 subjects from a multiethnic cohort (baseline examination: 2000-2002), in comparison with ABI-HI, the relative prevalence of PAD was 3.95 times higher in women and 2.74 times higher in men when ABI-LO was used. The relative magnitudes of the associations were largest between PAD and both subclinical atherosclerosis and CVD risk factors when ABI-HI was used, except when risk estimates for PAD were less than 1.0, where the largest relative magnitudes of association were found using ABI-LO. PAD prevalence and its associations with CVD risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis measures depend on the ankle pressure used to compute the ABI.