Randomized comparison of cold blood and cold crystalloid renal perfusion for renal protection during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Direct Reinfusion of Unwashed Shed Autologous Blood During Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study's purpose was to assess whether larger volumes of reinfused unwashed shed autologous blood (SAB) were associated with adverse events within 30 days for patients undergoing open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. During TAAA repair, our institution uses a system wherein SAB is filtered, but not washed or centrifuged, and then returned to the patient via a rapid-infusion device. By reinfusing SAB, the system preserves the patient's autologous whole blood and may reduce the number of allogenic transfusions required during TAAA repair, but the end-organ effects of reinfusing unwashed SAB have not been extensively evaluated.

METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively analyzed data from 972 consecutive patients who underwent open TAAA repair at our institution from 2007 to 2021 and who received SAB. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess whether SAB reinfusion volume was associated with a composite outcome of adverse events, as well as operative mortality, a composite of cardiac complications, a composite of pulmonary complications, or persistent paraplegia, stroke, or postoperative renal failure.

RESULTS

Among the cohort of 972 patients, the median volume of reinfused SAB was 4159 mL (quartile1-quartile3 [Q1-Q3]: 2524-6790 mL). Greater reinfusion volumes of unwashed SAB were not associated with greater odds of composite adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 per 1000 mL increase, 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.09, P = .624), nor with any individual outcome-operative mortality (OR, 1.02 per 1000 mL increase, 97.5% CI, 0.93-1.12, P = .617), a composite of cardiac complications (OR, 0.98 per 1000 mL increase, 97.5% CI, 0.93-1.04, P = .447), a composite of pulmonary complications (OR, 1.00 per 1000 mL increase, 97.5% CI, 0.94-1.06, P = .963), renal failure necessitating hemodialysis (OR, 1.01 per 1000 mL increase, 97.5% CI, 0.92-1.11, P = .821), persistent paraplegia (OR, 0.97 per 1000 mL increase, 97.5% CI, 0.84-1.13, P = .676), persistent stroke (OR, 0.85 per 1000 mL increase, 97.5% CI, 0.70-1.04, P = .070), or reoperation to control bleeding (OR, 0.99, 97.5% CI, 0.87-1.13, P = .900)-when adjusted for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing open TAAA repair, larger reinfusion volumes of unwashed SAB were not associated with greater odds of major early postoperative complications.

Long-Term Results of Thoracofemoral Bypass in the Initial Treatment of Juxtarenal Total Aortic Occlusion

BACKGROUND

Thoracofemoral bypass has been applied mostly secondary to previous procedures in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. However, its application as an initial treatment is less common, and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. The aim of this analysis was to review the 16-year experience and long-term outcomes of 31 consecutive patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass as the primary procedure.

METHODS

All patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The occlusion and calcified plaques of the abdominal aorta at the renal level were common characteristics of all patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: severe claudication group (Rutherford III group) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia group (Rutherford IV-V). Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables between the groups, and t-test or Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare continuous variables according to their distributions. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to depict the time-to-event data.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients [age: 62 (56-67.5); male: 87%] underwent thoracofemoral bypass. Among the 31 patients, 21 (67.7%) belonged to the severe claudication group (Rutherford III), while 10 (32.3%) were in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Rutherford IV-V). Twenty-two patients (83.8%) remained asymptomatic after thoracofemoral bypass. The mean follow-up duration was 79 ± 32 months. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.2% (n = 1). Major complications were observed in 9.6% of patients (n = 3; respiratory: 6.4%, retroperitoneal hematoma: 3.2%). No significant difference was found between the claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia groups regarding major complications (3.2% vs. 6.4%, P = NS). Minor complications occurred in 41.9% of patients, including pleural effusion 9.6% (n = 3), acute kidney injury 9.6% (n = 3), gastrointestinal bleeding 3.2% (n = 1), paralytic ileus 6.4% (n = 2), and superficial skin infection 12.9% (n = 4). The rate of postoperative superficial skin infection was higher in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group compared to the claudication group (4 [40%] vs. 0 [0%], P: 0.007). The univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that hypertension and diabetes mellitus were not related to primary patency of the thoracofemoral bypass graft. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated primary patency for the entire study was 96% ± 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.6-100), and the secondary patency was 96.3% ± 6% (95% CI: 89.4-100). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rate after thoracofemoral bypass was 93.4% ± 3 (95% CI: 91-100).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated in this study that thoracofemoral bypass can yield good outcomes when preferred as the initial treatment in selected patients with juxtarenal total aortic occlusion. Despite being a complex surgical technique, thoracofemoral bypass has shown to have safe, acceptable mortality and morbidity rates, as well as excellent long-term follow-up results in selected patients.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Presentation and outcomes of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in females, existing gaps, and future directions: A descriptive review

Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms are more common in men. Yet, females often have worse outcomes, fewer interventions, and lower treatment rates. Females have also benefited less from the research and treatment of those diseases than men. Understanding sex- and sex-specific differences in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms can improve care delivery, reduce disparities, and optimize outcomes for females with thoracic aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The authors reviewed the literature on the presentation and outcomes of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in females, discussing the existing gaps and future directions to address them.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Highlights and Perioperative Implications from the 2022 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease

As the understanding of aortic diseases and their complications grow, increasing importance of uniformity in diagnosis and management is crucial for optimal care of this patient population. The 2022 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease discusses these considerations in detail. The purpose of this review is to highlight essential recommendations that are of relevance to the perioperative physician who manages these patients. A few notable points include, shared decision-making with patients, creation of multidisciplinary aortic teams, lower diameter thresholds for surgery in certain situations, and increased testing for patients with heritable aortic diseases. In addition to briefly reviewing basics of aortic diseases, the authors discuss changes to guidelines that are especially relevant to perioperative care.

Contemporary outcomes of open repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Open repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection (ACTBAD), required when endovascular repair is not possible, is historically considered high-risk. We analyze our experience with this high-risk cohort compared with the standard cohort.

METHODS

We identified consecutive patients undergoing descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair from 1997 to 2021. Patients with ACTBAD were compared with those having surgery for other reasons. Logistic regression was used to identify associations with major adverse events (MAEs). Five-year survival and competing risk of reintervention were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 926 patients, 75 (8.1%) had ACTBAD. Indications included rupture (25/75), malperfusion (11/75), rapid expansion (26/75), recurrent pain (12/75), large aneurysm (5/75), and uncontrolled hypertension (1/75). The incidence of MAEs was similar (13.3% [10/75] vs 13.7% [117/851], P = .99). Operative mortality was 5.3% (4/75) vs 4.8% (41/851) (P = .99). Complications included tracheostomy (8%, 6/75), spinal cord ischemia (4%, 3/75), and new dialysis (2.7%, 2/75). Renal impairment, urgent/emergent operation, forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤50%, and malperfusion were associated with MAEs, but not ACTBAD (odds ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.20-1.16], P = .1). At 5 and 10 years, there was no difference in survival (65.8% [95% CI: 54.6-79.2] vs 71.3% [95% CI: 67.9-74.9], P = .42, and 47.3% [95% CI: 34.5-64.7] vs 53.7% [95% CI: 49.3-58.4], P = .29, respectively) or 10-year reintervention (12.5% [95% CI: 4.3-25.3] vs 7.1% [95% CI: 4.7-10.1], P = .17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In an experienced center, open repair of ACTBAD can be performed with low rates of operative mortality and morbidity. Outcomes similar to elective repair are achievable even in high-risk patients with ACTBAD. In patients unsuitable for endovascular repair, transfer to a high-volume center experienced in open repair should be considered.

The Feasibility of Debranching Aortic Arch and Visceral Arteries with Sutureless Telescoping Anastomoses During Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background

Open repair of aortic aneurysms frequently requires reimplantation of major aortic vessels. Traditional techniques can be time consuming, require meticulous hemostasis, and risk aneurysmal patch degeneration, which can require a challenging reoperation. We describe our experience using a stent graft to create a sutureless anastomosis that obviates these drawbacks.

Methods

Between April 2018 and March 2021, all consecutive adult patients who underwent open repair of the aorta with at least one supra-aortic trunk or visceral vessel reimplanted using the sutureless anastomotic technique were included. Anastomoses were constructed by bridging a branch graft and the target artery with a Viabahn self-expanding stent (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). Clinical information and perioperative outcomes for the patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

Among 26 patients, 50 individual aortic vessels were debranched using sutureless self-expanding stent anastomoses, including 42 visceral vessels and 8 supra-aortic trunk vessels. Technical success was 100%. The median time to complete the anastomosis was 3 minutes, 12 seconds (range, 2-6 minutes). Perioperative mortality was 15% (n = 4). No stent-related complications, such as occlusion, bleeding, stroke, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, bowel ischemia, or the need for anastomotic reintervention, occurred. Follow-up imaging at 1 year revealed a 100% patency rate and no anastomotic stenosis, misalignment, or kinking.

Conclusions

The sutureless anastomosis technique to debranch the aorta during open aortic aneurysm repair is technically feasible and reliably hemostatic and does not require early reintervention. The operative outcomes have been acceptable, and the short-term follow-up imaging findings demonstrated excellent patency without anastomotic kinking. In select cases, sutureless anastomoses are a possible alternative to traditional sutured anastomoses during aortic debranching. Further research is needed to compare the operative times and long-term patency of sutureless anastomosis to those of traditional sutured techniques.

Renal perfusion with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate compared with Ringer's solution in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic open repair

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of renal perfusion with Custodiol (Dr Franz-Kohler Chemie GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) versus enriched Ringer's solution for renal protection in patients undergoing open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair.

METHODS

Ninety consecutive patients scheduled for elective open TAAA repair were enrolled between 2015 and 2017 in a single-center, phase IV, prospective, parallel, randomized, double-blind trial (the CUstodiol versus RInger: whaT Is the Best Agent [CURITIBA] trial), and randomized to renal arteries perfusion with 4°C Custodiol (Dr Franz-Kohler Chemie GmbH, Bensheim, Germany; n = 45) or 4°C lactated Ringer's solution (n = 45). The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing TAAA open surgery using Custodiol renal perfusion versus an enriched Ringer's solution was the primary end point.

RESULTS

Ninety patients completed the study (45 patients in each group). The incidence of postoperative AKI was significantly lower in the Custodiol group (48.9% vs 75.6%; P = .02). In the multivariable model, only the use of Custodiol solution resulted as protective from the occurrence of any AKI (odds ratio, 0.230; 95% confidence interval, 0.086-0.614; P = .003), whereas TAAA type II extent was associated with the development of severe AKI (odds ratio, 4.277; 95% confidence interval, 1.239-14.762; P = .02). At 1-year follow-up, serum creatinine was not significantly different from the preoperative values in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Custodiol during open TAAA repair was safe and resulted in significantly lower rates of postoperative AKI compared with Ringer's solution. These findings support safety and efficacy of Custodiol in this specific setting, which is currently off-label.

Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: DON'T QUIT-JUST DO IT

Surgical aortic repair has progressed from aneurysm ligation to homografts to Dacron grafts to totally endovascular interventions. These fields will continue to evolve, and new endovascular technology will be used in virtually every part of the aorta, eventually dominating this field of surgery. However, as surgeons, we must be cautious and not let go of our open-surgery skills, as they will always be the ultimate bailout solution.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Anesthetic Management for Open Thoracoabdominal and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Open thoracoabdominal and abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs are some of the most challenging cases for anesthesiologists because of the potential for rapid blood loss combined with clamping and reperfusion, potential use of left heart bypass, the potential need for lung isolation, and potential placement and management of a spinal drain. In addition, patients often present with other significant comorbidities and a detailed understanding of the disease process, the complex physiology throughout the case, and the intricacies of organ protection are critical.

Thoracoabdominal Aortic Disease and Repair: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 3

Thoracoabdominal aortic disease is a rare but life-threatening condition that requires expert multidisciplinary collaborative management. Intervention is indicated in patients with symptomatic aneurysms or when an aneurysm reaches a certain threshold of diameter or rate of expansion. The strategies for spinal cord and end-organ protection have evolved over several decades, resulting in improved outcomes after repair. Open repair, although invasive, provides definitive and durable repair. Endovascular approaches are rapidly evolving, and the results with fenestrated and branched endografts are promising. Both open repair and endovascular repair require highly specialized expertise, and outcomes are best when repair is undertaken in an elective setting by a dedicated team. Patients with degenerative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and chronic dissections should be followed up closely and referred for elective repair when indicated.

Our experience with 1000 recent thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs, including endovascular stenting

OBJECTIVE

Managing patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms is demanding yet fascinating, and requires a team effort. This invited talk presents lessons learned as our history with open and endovascular procedures evolved for 2578 descending and thoracoabdominal repairs over the past 20 years.

METHODS

Beginning in 1985 with an analysis of 596 traumatic aortic ruptures and the risk of spinal cord ischemia, the evolution of research and procedures for thoracoabdominal aneurysms progressed. The focus of these studies, medication trials, and procedure adjustments was on lowering the risk of spinal cord ischemia.

RESULTS

Between January 2002 and December 2021, 2578 aneurysm repairs were performed. The respective mortality rates were 6.8% and 4.0% for all patients treated. The permanent spinal cord ischemia rates were 1.3% for open descending thoracic aortas and 4.9% for open thoracoabdominal aneurysms. A detailed analysis of open and thoracoabdominal repairs showed better long-term outcomes with open repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Through multiple randomized trials and innovations with procedures and techniques, the risk of death and spinal cord ischemia have been reduced. Long-term survival has also been improved. The pursuit of reducing the risks of descending and ascending thoracoabdominal repairs is a fascinating endeavor that has resulted in better patient outcomes. Nevertheless, this is a journey, and there will always be more room to achieve even better results.

Visceral and renal protection in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery

Ischemic renal failure and visceral ischemia are two serious complications of the surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The introduction of left atrial bypass, partial bypass, total circulatory arrest, and selective visceral perfusion has reduced the incidence of these complications over the past two decades. Yet these complications still persist, suggesting the sub-optimal nature of the available strategies.

Acute Kidney Injury Affects Mid-Term Outcomes of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair

The effect of acute kidney injury (AKI) on mid-term outcomes following thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is not well known. We hypothesized that postoperative AKI would reduce mid-term survival and aimed to analyze the effect of AKI on mid-term outcomes after TAAA repair. This retrospective study identified 294 consecutive TAAA repairs at Kobe University Hospital from October 1999 to March 2019. Patients with preexisting end-stage renal disease that required hemodialysis (n = 11) and patients who died intraoperatively (n = 2) were excluded. Finally, 281 patients were analyzed. AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines (KDIGO) classification. Of the 281 patients, 178 (63.3%) developed AKI, of which 98 (34.9%) had mild, 34 (12.1%) had moderate, and 46 (16.4%) had severe AKI. Twenty-six patients (12.8%) required renal replacement therapy after surgery. Twenty-three in-hospital deaths (8.2%) were recorded, including 2 (0.7%) without AKI, 0 (0%) with mild AKI, 1 (0.4%) with moderate AKI, and 20 (7.1%) with severe AKI (p < .001). The 4-year survival was 91.9 ± 3.0% for no AKI, 91.3 ± 3.2% for mild AKI, 72.4 ± 8.5% for moderate AKI and 32.6 ± 7.4% for severe AKI (p < .001). Multivariable Cox-hazard regression analysis demonstrated that moderate and severe AKI, older age and emergency surgery were significant risk factors for mid-term survival. In patients undergoing TAAA repair, severe AKI was associated with an increase in in-hospital mortality and both moderate and severe AKI were negatively associated with mid-term survival. Preventing moderate/severe AKI may improve mid-term survival after TAAA repair.

RETRACTED: Anesthesic and surgical guideline for the treatment of the thoraco-abdominal aorta. Consensus Document of the Spanish Societies of Anesthesia and Cardiovascular Surgery

Este artículo ha sido retirado por indicación del Editor Jefe de la revista, después de constatar que parte de su contenido había sido plagiado, sin mencionar la fuente original: European Heart Journal (2014) 35, 2873 926.: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/35/41/2873/407693#89325738 El autor de correspondencia ha sido informado de la decisión y está de acuerdo con la retirada del artículo. El Comité Editorial lamenta las molestias que esta decisión pueda ocasionar. Puede consultar la política de Elsevier sobre la retirada de artículos en https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

Splanchnic occlusive disease predicts for spinal cord injury after open descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we sought to discern the effects of splanchnic occlusive disease (SOD; renal, superior mesenteric, and/or celiac axis arteries) on spinal cord injury (SCI; paraparesis or paraplegia) and major adverse events (MAE) after descending thoracic aneurysm (DTA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open repair.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone DTA/TAAA repair at our institution were dichotomized according to the presence of SOD, which was investigated as a predictive factor of our primary (SCI) and secondary (operative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, tracheostomy, de novo dialysis, MAE, survival) endpoints. Risk adjustment used both propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

From July 1997 to October 2019, 888 patients had undergone DTA/TAAA repair, of whom 19 were excluded from our analysis for missing data. SOD was absent in 712 patients and present in 157 patients. The patients with SOD had presented with a greater incidence of preoperative renal impairment (61 [38.9%] vs 175 [24.6%]; P < .01) and peripheral arterial disease (60 [38.2%] vs 162 [22.8%]; P < .01] and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (45%; interquartile range, 10%; vs 50%; interquartile range, 4%; P < .01). The etiology of aortic disease was more frequently dissection in the SOD group (56.1% vs 43.7%) and more frequently nondissecting aneurysm in the non-SOD group (56.3% vs 43.9%; P < .01). Patients without SOD had presented with aneurysms more cranially located (DTA, 34.0% vs 7.6%; extent I TAAA, 44.0% vs 7.6%). In contrast, patients with SOD had presented with aneurysms more caudally located (extent II TAAA, 36.9% vs 8.6%; extent III TAAA, 30.6% vs 11.0%; extent IV TAAA, 17.2% vs 2.5%; P < .01). Propensity score matching led to 144 pairs, with SOD significantly associated with SCI (10 [6.9%] vs 2 [1.4%]; P = .03) and MAE (47 [32.6%] vs 26 [15%]; P < .01). Ten-year survival was reduced in those with SOD (31.5% vs 45.2%; P < .01). Conditional multivariable regression confirmed SOD to be a predictor of SCI in the matched sample (odds ratio, 6.60; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results have shown that SOD is a significant predictor of SCI in patients undergoing open DTA/TAAA repair. The investigation of measures to prolong neuronal ischemia tolerance (eg, hypothermia) is warranted for such patients.

Surgical strategies in the management of chronic dissection of the thoracoabdominal aorta

Most operations for dissection of the thoracoabdominal aorta take place in the chronic phase of the disease, because the acutely dissected distal aorta is almost always initially treated non-surgically with aggressive pharmacological anti-impulse therapy. Identifying patients who are no longer responding to medical treatment is the first step in preventing further disease progression and rupture. Symptomatic aneurysms should be promptly repaired. Asymptomatic patients are followed until significant aortic dilation occurs and reaches a threshold of intervention: current guidelines endorse repair once a diameter of 5.5 cm is reached. In patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease (such as Marfan Syndrome), the threshold of intervention is often lowered. Aortic replacement typically centers on the dilatated segment. For all extents of repair, we use passive mild hypothermia, sequential aortic cross-clamping, aggressive reimplantation of intercostal and lumbar arteries, and cold renal perfusion whenever possible. For Crawford extents I and II thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, we routinely use cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left heart bypass, and selective visceral perfusion. A four-branched graft approach to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair is frequently used in patients with chronic aortic dissection; this approach facilitates visceral artery perfusion during repair, expedites the distal anastomosis, and prevents subsequent visceral patch aneurysms. Lifelong imaging surveillance is necessary, because the distal aorta often continues to expand; residual aortic dissection commonly remains after repair and may necessitate further repair.

Kidney protection in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of both open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Its definition varies across difference studies, some standardized definitions (RIFLE, AKIN, KDIGO) have been proposed but still not uniformly employed in published papers. Acute kidney injury is multifactorial and is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality and late renal function decline. In addition, AKI is also associated with perioperative spinal cord ischemia. No specific pharmacological strategy has received a strong recommendation with high level of evidence as a protective measure. Fenoldopam, methylprednisolone or mannitol use to prevent AKI is commonly employed, but not supported by literature data. Avoiding nephrotoxic drugs and maintaining an adequate MAP, during and after the procedure plays a key role in preserving kidney function. During open TAAA surgery, renal arteries may be reimplanted using different techniques. The choice of the best option must be tailored to the patient, to reduce ischemic time and guarantee long-term patency. Current experience suggests that cold crystalloid solutions are the best substrates in preventing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Renal perfusion using Custodiol^® (Dr Franz-Kohler Chemie GmbH; Bensheim, Germany) 4 °C, even if currently considered off-label, represents an encouraging organ protection tool. In endovascular TAAA repair, techniques such as fusion imaging, use of diluted contrast, and CO<inf>2</inf> subtraction angiography have the potential to reduce postoperative AKI. Visceral vessels patency is closely related to the anatomy. Therefore, accurate endograft design according to these characteristics is crucial for long-term preservation of renal function.

Open vs. endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: tale of the tape

Open surgical repair persists as the gold-standard operation for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm; however, endovascular repair has become commonplace. Technical considerations in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treatment are particularly complex, insofar as it involves critical branching arteries feeding the visceral organs. Newer, low-profile devices make total endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair more feasible and, thus, appealing. For younger and low-risk patients, the choice between open and endovascular therapy remains controversial. Despite the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure, data suggest that endovascular aortic repair incurs a greater risk of spinal cord deficit, and the durability of endovascular aortic repair remains unclear. It is difficult to compare outcomes between endovascular and open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, primarily because of the current investigational status of endovascular devices, the variety of approaches to endovascular repair, differing patient populations, lack of prospective randomized studies, and minimal medium- and long-tern follow-up data on endovascular repair. When deciding between open and endovascular approaches, one should consider which is more suitable for each patient. Older patients generally benefit from a less invasive approach. Open repair should be considered for young patients and those with heritable thoracic aortic disease. Infection and fistulae are best treated by open repair, although endovascular intervention as a lifesaving bridge to definitive repair has evolved to become a critical component of initial treatment. It is crucial to have technical expertise in both open and endovascular procedures to provide the best aortic repair for the patient. This may require dedicated aortic programs at tertiary institutions.

Thoracoabdominal aneurysmectomy: Operative steps for Crawford extent II repair

Background

Open surgical repair remains the gold standard for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Surgery aims to replace the whole length of the diseased distal aorta while protecting the spinal cord and the visceral organs to limit ischemia-related complications. The substantial associated surgical risks, including death, paraplegia, renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, and respiratory complications leading to prolonged intensive care unit stay, still outweigh the natural history of TAAA with conservative treatment.

Methods

We describe in detail our current approach to open extent II TAAA repair with a step-by-step illustration of the technique and the surgical adjuncts.

Results

We routinely perform left heart bypass with mild passive hypothermia (34°C), cerebrospinal fluid drainage, sequential aortic cross-clamping, monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cerebral, paraspinal, and lower limb oxygen saturation by near-infrared spectrometry, as well as selective visceral perfusion via the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries and renal protection with intermittent administration of Custodiol HTK (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate) solution via the renal arteries. We advocate for individual branch reimplantation using a branched thoracoabdominal graft when possible, and we selectively reattach 1 or more pairs of the lower thoracic intercostal arteries and/or high lumbar arteries, even in the absence of a significant reduction in the MEPs signal. The distal anastomosis is usually constructed above the aortic bifurcation and occasionally to each iliac separately using a bifurcated graft.

Conclusions

Favorable early outcomes and a durable TAAA repair can be achieved at experienced high-volume centers with standardized preoperative selection and multidisciplinary team-based intraoperative and postoperative management of these patients.

Early Postoperative Renal Dysfunction Predicts Long-Term Renal Function Degradation after Type IV Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgical Repair

BACKGROUND

Type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgical repair is often complicated by postoperative acute kidney injury. The aim was to evaluate early renal injury influence on long-term renal function.

METHODS

All type IV thoracoabdominal surgical repair performed between January 2000 and January 2014 in our tertiary hospital were included in this retrospective observational study. All procedures were performed through a retroperitoneal approach with at least suprarenal aortic cross-clamping. Cold Ringer Lactate was used to perfuse the kidneys. Serum creatinine (Scr.) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were recorded preoperatively, daily until discharge and at least annually during follow-up. Postoperative renal dysfunction was classified using the RIFLE score. Predictors of long-term renal decline were identified by logistic regression and a Cox model.

RESULTS

Of total, 80 patients were included. Aortic clamping level was suprarenal (10%), supramesenteric (37%) or supracoeliac (53%). Ischemic durations were 29 ± 9 min for the gastrointestinal tract and the right kidney, 54 ± 28 min for the left kidney. Three patients died postoperatively. At discharge, 31 (38.8%) patients did not have a postoperative renal impairment (RIFLE-), compared with 49 (61.2%) who had a renal dysfunction (RIFLE+). GFR was 89 ± 29 ml/min vs 68 ± 37 ml/min, respectively (P < 0.01). In the RIFLE + group, Scr. was increased by x1.5 (Risk) for 22 patients, x2 (Injury) for 19 patients, and ×3 (Failure) for 8 patients. Mean follow-up was 59 months. Eighteen patients died, and 2 patients started permanent dialysis at 46 and 118 months during follow-up. The only predictive factor of long-term GFR degradation was a postoperative GFR below 45 ml/min (OR: 16.5; 95%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative renal dysfunction was a frequent complication, associated with long-term renal function degradation.

Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on the outcomes of open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

To discern the impact of depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the outcomes of open descending thoracic aneurysm (DTA) and thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) repair.

METHODS

Restricted cubic spline analysis was used to identify a threshold of LVEF, which corresponded to an increase in operative mortality and major adverse events (MAE: operative death, myocardial infarction, stroke, spinal cord injury, need for tracheostomy or dialysis). Logistic and Cox regression were performed to identify independent predictors of MAE, operative mortality, and survival.

RESULTS

DTA/TAAA repair was performed in 833 patients between 1997 and 2018. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed that patients with LVEF <40% (n = 66) had an increased risk of MAE (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-3.87; P < .01) and operative mortality (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.21-6.12; P = .02) compared with the group with LVEF ≥40% (n = 767). The group with LVEF <40% had a worse preoperative profile (eg, coronary revascularization, 48.5% vs 17.3% [P < .01]; valvular disease, 82.8% vs 49.39% [P < .01]; renal insufficiency, 45.5% vs 26.1% [P < .01]; respiratory insufficiency, 36.4% vs 21.2% [P = .01]) and worse long-term survival (35.5% vs 44.7% at 10 years; P = .01). Nonetheless, on multivariate regression, depressed LVEF was not an independent predictor of operative mortality, MAE, or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

LVEF is not an independent predictor of adverse events in surgery for DTA.

Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: From an Era of Revolution to an Era of Evolution

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair has a rich and storied tradition that began in Houston, Texas with great pioneer surgeons such as Drs Michael E. DeBakey, Denton A. Cooley, and E. Stanley Crawford. Their early attempts to repair TAAA were complicated by the persistent threats of renal and spinal cord ischemia and difficulty in reattaching the branching vessels of the thoracoabdominal aorta. Today, under the tutelage of Dr Joseph S. Coselli, the Texas Medical Center remains at the forefront of TAAA repair. In this place where great surgeons once walked the halls, their legacy continues.

Review: perspectives on renal and visceral protection during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Open repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) is an extensive operation and associated with significant perioperative morbidities and mortality, in large part due to distal aortic ischemia secondary to aortic cross-clamping that is necessitated during repair. Distal aortic ischemia may manifest as complications of the kidneys and viscera. Postoperative renal complications range from temporarily elevated levels of creatinine resulting from impaired kidney function to acute renal failure necessitating dialysis that may persist after hospital discharge. Continued advances in the management and adjuncts associated with TAAA repair since the groundbreaking era of E.S. Crawford have led to improved postoperative outcomes following surgery, but the dramatic improvements seen in reducing rates of spinal cord deficits, mesenteric ischemia and other serious postoperative complications have not been seen in contemporary rates of postoperative renal failure. We provide an overview of the various surgical techniques and adjuncts as they relate to the management of visceral and renal ischemia.

Surgery for chronic type B dissection with aneurysmal degeneration

Purpose

Open repair of descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) continues to carry a not insignificant operative risk, even in experienced hands. Over the past three decades, there has been considerable improvement in both the mortality and morbidity associated with these procedures. Herein, we describe our operative results and long-term outcomes in patients with chronic type B aortic dissections.

Methods

Review of the aortic surgical database was conducted to identify all consecutive patients who underwent repair of TAAA for chronic type B dissection from May 1997 to March 2018. The primary end point was operative mortality with secondary end points as the composite of major adverse events as well as each of the individual complications.

Results

One hundred and fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria with 54.9% (84/153) having surgery on an elective basis. The mean age was 58.9 years with a majority of male gender-107/153 (69.9%). Eighty-three (54.2%) of the TAAA were extent I, while 36 (23.5%) were extent II and 34 (22.3%) extent III-IV. Operative mortality was 8.5% (13/153) with eight of the deaths in patients who presented with extent II TAAA. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, 87.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77.9-97.1%) of the elective cohort were alive after 5 years while only 69.9% (CI 55.2-84.6%) of those in need of urgent/emergency intervention survived (p = .039).

Conclusions

In a majority of patients with chronic type B dissections, reproducibly, excellent outcomes can be achieved with relatively low risk of mortality. In the higher risk subsets of patients with extent II TAAA, careful consideration and discussion of expected outcomes will help inform the decision-making process.

Protecting the brain and spinal cord in aortic arch surgery

Protection of the central nervous system-either the brain or the spinal cord-during aortic surgery has been the subject of intense research over the past several decades. While it took some 30 years to prove that some of the techniques first practiced in animals are valuable, surgeons can now take courage from 50 years of research that has resulted in superb outcomes, particularly when compared with historical results. Complex total arch operations and descending aortic operations can now be performed with less than a 2% rate of stroke, spinal cord injury, or death. Thoracoabdominal aortic operations and endovascular procedures have also become considerably safer with excellent results reported. The following review will discuss some of the historical outcomes, innovations, iterations, current techniques, and outcomes.

State-of the-art review on the renal and visceral protection during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

During open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OTAAAR), there is an inevitable organ ischemic period that occurs when the abdominal arteries are being reattached to the aortic graft. Despite various protective techniques, the incidence of renal and visceral complications remains substantial. This state-of-the-art review gives an overview of the current and most evidence-based organ protection methods during OTAAAR, based on the most recent publications and personal experience. An electronic search was performed in four medical databases, using the following MeSH terms: thoracoabdominal aneurysm, TAAAR, visceral protection, renal protection, kidney, perfusion, and intestines. Every publication type was considered. The literature search was ended on August 31st, 2017. The left heart bypass (LHB) is currently the most frequent adjunct to provide distal aortic perfusion (DAP) during aortic clamping. Together with systemic hypothermia, it forms the cornerstone in organ protection during aortic clamping. Further renal protection can be obtained by selective renal perfusion (SRP) with cold blood or cold crystalloid solution, the latter enriched with mannitol. The perfusion should be administered in a volume- and pressure-controlled way and, if possible, by use of a pulsatile pump. Selective visceral perfusion (SVP) is not routinely used, as it does not provide adequate blood flow for visceral protection. The best way to protect the intestines is by minimizing the ischemic time. The preservation of renal and visceral function after OTAAAR can only be obtained with specific strategies before, during, and after the operation. This involves a series of measures, including selective digestive decontamination (SDD), avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs, minimizing the renal and intestinal ischemic time, systemic cooling, avoidance of hemodynamic instability, and regional protective perfusion of the kidneys. Future innovations in catheters, cardiac bypass flow types, mechanical components, hybrid vascular grafts, and pharmaceutical protection measures will hopefully further reduce organ complications.

Whole body perfusion strategy for aortic arch repair under moderate hypothermia

INTRODUCTION

Aortic arch reconstruction under moderate hypothermia is commonly performed with antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) for brain protection; however, hypothermia alone is often solely relied upon for visceral and lower body protection. We investigated whether the addition of simultaneous lower body perfusion to ACP (whole body perfusion - WBP) may ameliorate the metabolic derangements of moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2014, 106 consecutive patients underwent elective or emergent aortic arch surgery with MHCA, with either ACP only (44 patients, 66±12 years, 30% female) or WBP (62 patients, 61±15 years, 31% female). Primary outcomes included 30-day/in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) and specific parameters of metabolic recovery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in 30-day/in-hospital mortality (ACP: 3 (6.8%), WBP: 2 (3.2%); p=0.65), stroke (ACP: 1 (2.3%), WBP: 1 (1.6%); p=1.0) or renal failure (ACP: 2 (4.5%), WBP: 1 (1.5%); p=0.57). In the WBP group, we identified a significant reduction in lactate level at ICU admission (ACP 5.5 vs. WBP 3.5 mmol/L; p=0.002), time to lactate normalization (p=0.014) and median ICU length-of-stay (ACP 3 vs. WBP 1 days; p=0.049). There was no difference in post-operative creatinine (ACP: 104, WBP: 107 μmol/L; p=0.66). After multivariable regression adjustment, perfusion strategy no longer remained an independent predictor of ICU discharge time (p=0.09), however, cardiopulmonary bypass time (p=0.02), age (p=0.012) and emergent surgery (p=0.02) were.

CONCLUSIONS

A WBP strategy during aortic arch reconstruction with MHCA may be associated with more rapid normalization of metabolic parameters and reduced ICU length of stay compared to using ACP alone. Further evaluation with a randomized trial is warranted.

Long-term fate of renal function after open surgery for juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Although the indications for endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm have been expanding, our primary strategy for pararenal and juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (P/JRAA) is open surgery (OS). One consequence of OS for P/JRAA is transient renal ischemia owing to renal artery clamping, which can be followed by acute kidney injury (AKI). Prior studies referred to the impact of renal ischemia on AKI, but they have rarely evaluated longer-term renal function. This study focused on a chronic renal decline (CRD) during follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our series of P/JRAA treated with OS from 2007 to 2015. Patients on hemodialysis at the time of surgery were excluded. Preoperative renal function was estimated using the chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging system. Postoperative AKI was defined by the RIFLE criteria (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End-stage renal disease). CRD was defined as progression in CKD stage or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline of >20%.

RESULTS

Among 451 elective OS, 111 underwent repair for P/JRAA. Three patients were excluded because of preoperative hemodialysis. Consequently, 108 patients were enrolled. Preoperatively, 41 patients (38.0%) had CKD stage 3 (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Eight patients (7.2%) were in stage 4 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²). Proximal clamping was supraceliac (6 patients), suprarenal (34 patients), and inter-renal (68 patients). The median renal ischemic time was 33 minutes. The left renal vein was divided in 24 patients. Fourteen renal arteries in 14 patients were revascularized. Cold renal perfusion was applied in 11 patients. One in-hospital death was excluded from these analyses. AKI was observed in 20 patients (18.7%). One patient required temporary hemodialysis. During a median renal function follow-up for 24.5 months (interquartile range, 3.34-48.4), 17 patients (15.9%) had CRD. One patient required hemodialysis 5 years after surgery. In univariate analysis, CKD stages 3 and 4 were significant predictors for CRD (P = .014 and P < .001, respectively). Cold renal perfusion was associated with a higher risk of CRD (P = .047). On multivariate analysis, preoperative CKD stage 3 (hazard ratio, 4.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-16.3; P = .036) and stage 4 (hazard ratio, 59.72; 95% confidence interval, 10.13-352.0; P < .001) were identified as risk factors. In patients with CKD stage ≤2, the estimated freedom from CRD at 5 years was 96.6 ± 3.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD stage ≥3 was a significant risk for CRD after OS for P/JRAA. Renal artery clamping seemed innocuous for patients with a preoperative eGFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² in terms of CRD. No significant impact of left renal vein division on CRD was confirmed.