Morphologic findings and management strategy of spontaneous isolated dissection of the celiac artery

A case report of Spontaneous celiac artery dissection treated by endovascular intervention

Spontaneous celiac artery dissection is uncommon. Abdominal pain is a common clinical presentation. Conservative medical treatments, endovascular interventions, and open surgery are used to treat spontaneous celiac artery dissection. A 49-year-old male patient visited our hospital, with back and subxiphoid pain that had persisted for 11 hours. He has been smoking 40 cigarettes a day for 20 years. The blood pressure was 180/100mmHg. Aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) images revealed dissection of the celiac artery, common hepatic artery, left hepatic artery, right hepatic artery, and splenic artery. Urapidil hydrochloride and isosorbide dinitrate were administered to lower the blood pressure to approximately 110/70 mmHg. However, the back and subxiphoid pain persisted without relief. Angiography was performed and a vascular stent (BARD, LIFE STENT, VASCULAR, 8 × 60) was implanted into the celiac artery without involving the branches. Pain was immediately relieved after interventional therapy. The patient was discharged after 4 days. A subsequent aortic CTA after 10 months confirmed that the celiac artery dissection had still not reoccurred.

Management of Spontaneous Isolated Celiac Artery Dissection

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is uncommon, with very few series reported in the literature. The present study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with SICAD treated at a single Chilean institution over 20 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients from a single academic hospital with SICAD diagnosed between January 2003 and March 2023 was performed. Conservative treatment included antiplatelets, anticoagulation, or both. The normal size of a celiac artery in our population was 7.9 ± 0.79 mm in females and 8.3 ± 1.08 mm in males. We defined a celiac artery with a diameter equal to or more than 12.5 mm as an aneurysmal celiac artery.

RESULTS

The cohort included 27 patients; 77.8% (n = 21) were males. The median age was 51.0 years (range: 38-84 years). Fourteen (51.8%) patients presented with aneurysmal dilatation. Fourteen (51.8%) patients were treated with antiplatelets, 6 (22.2%) patients with anticoagulation, and 7 (25.9%) with anticoagulation and antiplatelets. One patient was treated with endovascular therapy due to a pseudoaneurysm of the celiac artery detected 10 days after conservative treatment with antiplatelets. The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range: 2-14 days). Complete remodeling was seen in 6 (22.2%) patients, partial remodeling in 10 (37.0%) patients, and no change was seen in 8 (26.9%) patients. Three (11.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences between treatments and remodeling outcomes (P = 0.729). The median celiac artery diameter of patients with aneurysmal dilatation was 13.5 mm (range: 12.5-20.5 mm). Systemic arterial hypertension was found more commonly in patients who presented with aneurysmal dilatation than in patients without (87.5% vs. 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.016). Mean follow-up was 41.5 months and median follow-up was 16 months (range: 6-204 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with SICAD can be treated conservatively with excellent outcomes. Hypertension was more commonly found in patients with SICAD and aneurysmal dilatation.

Mid-term Results of the Treatment of Isolated Dissection of the Celiac Artery: A Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Versus Conservative Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is an alternative method used to treat isolated dissection of the celiac artery (IDCA). However, only a few mid-term results have been reported. This study aimed to analyze and compare the outcomes of endovascular and non-operative therapies for IDCA.

METHODS

Data from a cohort of consecutive IDCA patients enrolled in the study hospital between April 2012 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, imaging features, treatment modalities, and follow-up results of celiac artery remodeling and adverse events were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study. Stents were deployed in 68 patients, and non-operative treatment (blood pressure control and pain management) was continued in the remaining 19 patients who did not receive stenting; among these 19 patients, EVT failed in 6. The mean follow-up period was 37.3 (range, 10-85 months) and 44.0 (range, 9-80 months) months in the EVT and non-operative groups, respectively. During follow-up, the overall complete remodeling (absence of residual dissection with no false lumen or no intramural thrombus) rate was significantly higher in the EVT group than in the non-operative group (87.3% vs 7.1%, p<0.001). The incomplete remodeling (improved true lumen with malabsorption or partial thrombosis of the false lumen) rate was not significantly different between the EVT and non-operative groups (6.3% vs 14.3%; p=0.2984). Meanwhile, the adverse event-free survival rates were 89.0%, 67.0%, and 67.0% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, in the EVT group compared with 39.7% and 29.8% at 1 and 3 years in the non-operative group (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

EVT for IDCA may be considered an effective management option with a favorable clinical success rate, an encouraging complete remodeling rate, and a satisfactory adverse event-free survival rate. However, further evaluation with a long-term follow-up is required.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Endovascular intervention for isolated dissection of the celiac artery has attracted inadequate attention. In this retrospective study with comparative analysis of endovascular versus conservative therapy for isolated dissection of the celiac artery patients, a better complete remodeling rate and a higher adverse event-free survival rate were observed in the endovascular treatment (EVT) group during follow-up, indicating that EVT could be an effective management option for isolated dissection of the celiac artery.

Spontaneous Celiac Artery Dissection with Splenic Infarction: A Report of Two Cases

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare condition that is characterized by sudden onset abdominal pain, typically occurring in middle-aged men. Although its clinical course is mostly benign, it may progress to true lumen occlusion. No established therapeutic guidelines are available for SICAD associated with splenic infarction. This report describes two patients who presented with sudden onset abdominal pain and were diagnosed with SICAD with splenic infarction based on computed tomography (CT) findings. Patients were treated with bowel rest and anticoagulants. After a week of medical therapy, the abdominal pain resolved. Follow-up CT revealed no progression of the dissection flap. The patients received oral anticoagulants for 3 months and did not experience any symptom recurrence. Medical therapy with anticoagulants may be considered for patients with SICAD and splenic infarction. Associated splenic infarction itself is not an indication for endovascular or surgical intervention for SICAD.

The management of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection: A case report and literature review

OBJECTIVES

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) without associated aortic dissection is a rare disease. Complications are ischemia, aneurysm formation, and rupture. Different treatment options have been reported for managing SICAD, including conservative management, endovascular intervention, and open surgery. Despite the increased recognition of this disease, there are no consensus guidelines on management of this condition. To improve the knowledge and treatment of this disease, a case of SICAD was reported.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We describe the case of a 57-year-old woman with SICAD whose symptoms improved after endovascular treatment when conservative treatment failed and systematically analyze the management strategy for patients with SICAD.

CONCLUSIONS

SICAD is a rare disease and has no universally agreed upon guidelines for treatment. Most patients can be first treated conservatively for dissection with strict blood pressure control, antithrombotic therapy, and intensive surveillance. For SICAD patients with aneurysms located in the celiac trunk, stent grafts can be used in such patients without affecting the branch blood supply.

Risk factor analysis and treatment outcome of patients with spontaneous isolated celiac axis or superior mesenteric artery dissection

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous isolated mesenteric artery (celiac axis or superior mesenteric artery [SMA]) dissection (IMAD) is a rare clinical entity. The aim of the present study was to examine the patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical and radiologic features, management, and prognosis and to identify the risk factors predictive of symptoms.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective review from November 2005 to November 2021 of prospectively collected data from patients with a diagnosis of IMAD. The clinical data and radiologic images were reviewed, and statistical analysis was performed to compare the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were identified. Of the 78 patients, 24 (31%) had had celiac dissections, 51 (65%) had had SMA dissections, and 3 (4%) had had both celiac and SMA dissections. The mean age was 57.7 years (range, 36-84 years), with a male predominance (86%). More than one half (55%) of the patients had had hypertension. In addition, 29 patients (37%) were symptomatic, and 24 (31%) had been admitted to the hospital. The symptomatic patients with celiac axis dissections were more likely to have thrombosis (P = .02), significant stenosis (P = .01) or branch extension (P = .02). The symptomatic patients with SMA dissections were more likely to have a smaller artery diameter (P = .07), a longer dissection length (P = .05), thrombosis (P < .001), significant stenosis (P < .001), or branch extension (P = .003). The symptomatic patients were more likely to have been treated with antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (P < .001). Only three patients had undergone an intervention. Seven patients (9%) had died of unrelated causes. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 5-year survival rate of 96% and 10-year survival rate of 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

IMAD is an uncommon disease entity with a risk of visceral ischemia. Nonetheless, most of these patients can be treated conservatively with medication, with only a small minority requiring emergency surgery.

General features, management strategies, and outcomes of symptomatic spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection

Objectives

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare condition that has not been fully investigated and reported, and very little is known regarding its prognosis and management. Here, we aimed to provide more evidence on the management strategy and outcome for symptomatic SICAD based on the experience of a single center.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2021, a total of consecutive 51 patients with symptomatic SICAD were retrospectively included in this study. These patients had been selectively treated with conservative treatment (n = 31) or endovascular treatment (n = 20). Baseline data, imaging findings, treatment strategy, outcomes, and follow-up data have been described and analyzed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 53.2 ± 9.6 years, 44 (86.3%) were male, and 36 (70.6%) had hypertension. The median length of stay was 10.0 days. The complete remission rate was 92.2% on discharge. The median follow-up time was 21.0 months. A secondary intervention was required for two patients during follow-up in the conservative group, wherein one underwent a stent placement three months after discharge because of progression of symptoms and extension of dissection, and the other required intervention one month after discharge because of symptomatic progression. No secondary intervention was required in the endovascular group. Occasional and mild relapse of symptoms occurred in two patients in both the conservative and endovascular groups, with no secondary intervention. The length of dissection (25.5 ± 11.8 mm vs. 19.1 ± 7.4 mm, P = 0.022) and complete remodeling rate (85.7% vs. 15.4%, P < 0.001) in the endovascular group were greater than that in the conservative group.

Conclusion

Patients with symptomatic SICAD who were selectively treated with conservative treatment or endovascular treatment had satisfactory early and medium-term outcomes. Endovascular treatment showed significant advantages in the complete remodeling of the celiac artery and presented with a lower rate of secondary intervention. Moreover, it was found to be a safe and effective remedy for failed conservative treatment.

Current status of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the current status of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD).

METHODS

The English-language literature published in various databases before December 2020 was reviewed. All case reports and series were included. If multiple reports came from the same hospital and covered the same period, only the most recent report was considered. The clinical characteristics, imaging features, and treatment outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 88 English language publications between January 1959 and December 2020, including 70 case reports, two case series, and 16 clinical studies. Overall, 316 cases of SICAD were reported in the studies, including 268 men and 44 women (unavailable for 4, men: women ratio: 6:1, p < 0.05). The median age was 50.5 years (range: 6-72) in men and 53.9 years (range: 41-67) in women. Most patients (83.54%, 264/316) complained about stomach pain, primarily in the epigastric region (38.61%, 122/316). The misdiagnosis rate in this study was 3.16% (10/316). The most commonly used imaging modality was computed tomography angiography (CTA), with 97.47% (308/316) cases reporting its use in diagnosis and/or management. The rate of symptom improvement with Conservative Management, with or without antithrombotic agents, was 92.45% (98/106) and 96.58% (141/146), respectively. The rate of symptom improvement after surgical recanalization was 100% (13/13). Moreover, endovascular management resulted in a 100% (50/50) symptom improvement rate.

CONCLUSION

Conservative management is the first-line treatment for SICAD. The surgical or endovascular intervention had a high technical success rate, suggesting that it should be reserved for patients who have failed conservative treatment.

Diagnosis and treatment of isolated celiac artery dissection following blunt trauma: A case report

Introduction

Celiac artery (CA) dissection due to blunt abdominal trauma is extremely rare and, as such, the clinical features of this potentially life-threatening injury have not been clearly defined, nor have treatment strategies been established.

Presentation of case

We describe the case of a 61-year-old man who presented to our emergency department after a motor vehicle accident. Although the patient did not report abdominal pain, enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed CA dissection. The patient was treated conservatively using antiplatelet therapy and was discharged from the hospital on day 8, without complications.

Discussion

As abdominal pain is not a common presenting factor of CA dissection after blunt trauma, it should be suspected as a potential injury in all affected patients and comprehensively assessed, with CT being the most useful diagnostic modality.

Conclusion

In the absence of any signs of organ ischemia, changes in the CA aneurysm, and persistent, severe abdominal pain following blunt abdominal trauma, conservative treatment is indicated, with or without anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy.

•

Celiac artery (CA) dissection due to blunt abdominal trauma is extremely rare.

•

We describe a case of CA dissection after a motor vehicle accident.

•

Enhanced computed tomography revealed the CA dissection.

•

The patient was treated conservatively and was discharged from hospital on day 8.

Multiple Spontaneous Visceral Arterial Dissections in a Patient With Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome on Corticosteroid Therapy

Multiple spontaneous visceral arterial dissections are an infrequent occurrence. The etiology, risk factors and natural history of these dissections have not been elucidated, and the optimal therapeutic strategy has not been established. We report a rare case of multiple spontaneous visceral arterial dissections involving the celiac artery, splenic artery, superior mesenteric artery, and right renal artery in a patient with Tolosa-Hunt syndrome on short-term corticosteroid therapy. The patient was subjected to conservative treatment and endovascular repair, achieving good clinical and radiological outcomes during the long-term follow-up period.

Management of Spontaneous Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review

Background and Aims:

There are increasing reports on case series on spontaneous isolated mesenteric artery dissection, that is, dissections of the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery, mainly due to improved diagnostic capacity of high-resolution computed tomography angiography performed around the clock. A few case–control studies are now available, while randomized controlled trials are awaited.

Material and Methods:

The present systematic review based on 97 original studies offers a comprehensive overview on risk factors, management, conservative therapy, morphological modeling of dissection, and prognosis.

Results and Conclusions:

Male gender, hypertension, and smoking are risk factors for isolated mesenteric artery dissection, while the frequency of diabetes mellitus is reported to be low. Large aortomesenteric angle has also been considered to be a factor for superior mesenteric artery dissection. The overwhelming majority of patients can be conservatively treated without the need of endovascular or open operations. Conservative therapy consists of blood pressure lowering therapy, analgesics, and initial bowel rest, whereas there is no support for antithrombotic agents. Complete remodeling of the dissection after conservative therapy was found in 43% at mid-term follow-up. One absolute indication for surgery and endovascular stenting of the superior mesenteric artery is development of peritonitis due to bowel infarction, which occurs in 2.1% of superior mesenteric artery dissections and none in celiac artery dissections. The most documented end-organ infarction in celiac artery dissections is splenic infarctions, which occurs in 11.2%, and is a condition that should be treated conservatively. The frequency of ruptured pseudoaneurysm in the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery dissection is very rare, 0.4%, and none of these patients were in shock at presentation. Endovascular therapy with covered stents should be considered in these patients.

Clinical features and management strategy of symptomatic spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and management strategy for patients with symptomatic spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with symptomatic SICAD from two institutions were included. The demographics, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, imaging findings and treatment strategy selection were obtained from the medical records. The general epidemiological data, treatment regimens and clinical and follow-up outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into the conservative treatment group (group A, n = 26) and endovascular treatment group (group B, n = 11). Of these 37 patients, extent of dissection in both groups included only celiac trunk (61.54%% vs. 18.18%, p = 0.03), common hepatic artery (CHA) and splenic artery (SA) (3.85%% vs. 54.55%, p = 0.001), CHA (7.69% vs. 18.18%, p = 0.57), SA (23.08% vs. 9.09, p = 0.65) and left gastric artery (LGA) (3.85% vs. 54.55%, p = 0.99). Of note, the extension of the lesion in group A was shorter than that in group B. In addition, there were significantly more type IIb in group A than in group B (42.31% vs. 9.09%, p = 0.06) and the mean length of dissection in group A was 42.3 ± 54.71 mm which was significantly shorter than that in the group B 58.45 ± 3.71 mm (p =0.04). During a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the 1, 3, 6 and 12 month follow-ups were completed in 100% (37/37), 100% (37/37), 94.59% (35/37) and 91.19% (34/37) of patients, respectively. The cumulative rate of persistent disease stability in patients with endovascular treatment group was higher than in that conservative treatment group at the 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (50% vs. 16.67%, p = 0.001; 80% vs. 37.5%, p =0.03; 100% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.012;100% vs. 91.67%, p = 0.02 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Most symptomatic SICAD have a tendency to persistent disease stability after conservative treatment. Risk factors for failed conservative treatment were length of dissection and branch involvement. Furthermore, endovascular treatment was associated with a high technical success and persistent disease stability rate, which might be reserved for patients with failed conservative treatment.

Management of endovascular treatment in spontaneous iliac artery dissections: Applications enabling classical surgery

Background

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of endovascular applications for the treatment of spontaneous iliac artery dissections.

Methods

The medical records of 13 patients (12 males, 1 female; mean age 67.9±5.7 years; range, 58 to 75 years) with spontaneous iliac artery dissection between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of spontaneous iliac artery dissection was made based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, physical examination and imaging findings, and hybrid treatments applied during endovascular treatment were analyzed.

Results

The mean follow-up was 12.5±1.1 (range, 6 to 16) months. Five patients received hybrid treatment during endovascular treatment. The re-entry site was closed by a patch plasty over the common femoral artery in one of these patients. Embolectomy was performed in the remaining four patients for the treatment of acute ischemia of the extremities. Since no patency could be achieved in two of the patients undergoing embolectomy, a femoropopliteal bypass was performed. The technical success and primary patency rates were 100%. No new false lumen formation, intra-stent occlusion or arterial occlusion was observed during the hospital stay and follow-up.

Conclusion

Endovascular methods can be safely used in the treatment of spontaneous iliac artery dissections; however, hybrid treatments may be also required in selected cases. We believe that it is effective and safe to apply endovascular and hybrid treatments without preventing possible surgical treatments which may be required in the future.

Iliac Arteries Dissection with a Rapid Dilatation as Debut of Fibromuscular Dysplasia

We report a case of a 38-year-old male diagnosed with fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and a dissection of both common iliac arteries without aortic involvement. It was revealed after an inguinal hematoma and a pelvic pain, which are not the typical FMD presentation. Surgical treatment was performed after a rapid iliac growth in the first month control computed tomography angiography. Although the clinical course of this entity is relatively benign, rupture of the common iliac artery has also been described.

Spontaneous visceral artery dissections in otherwise normal arteries: Clinical features, management, and outcomes compared with fibromuscular dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

Visceral artery dissection with otherwise normal-appearing arteries (VADNA), diagnosed on imaging and suggestive of segmental arterial mediolysis, is a poorly understood disease entity. Study objectives were to define the clinical features, management, and outcomes of patients with VADNA compared with patients with fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD).

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with a diagnosis of VADNA or FMD evaluated in the Mayo Clinic Gonda Vascular Center (January 1, 2000-April 1, 2017) were identified. Patient demographics, symptom presentation, management, composite adverse arterial events (recurrent arterial dissection, stroke or transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, mesenteric or renal infarction, or need for revascularization), and overall survival were compared between VADNA and FMD patients.

RESULTS

There were 103 VADNA patients (age [mean ± standard deviation], 51.7 ± 11.0 years; 27.9% female) and 248 FMD controls (49.8 ± 8.9 years; 81.8% female) identified. The most common symptom for VADNA patients was abdominal or flank pain (80.6%). For FMD, chest pain, headache, and dizziness were more frequent presenting complaints. The median follow-up was longer for VADNA patients (42 months; interquartile range, 9-76 months) compared with FMD patients (19 months; interquartile range, 0.6-52 months; P < .001). During this time interval, there were twofold more composite arterial events in the VADNA group compared with the FMD group (17% vs 8.1%; P = .01). This difference was primarily driven by recurrent dissections. All-cause mortality was low and similar for both groups (3.8% vs 0.4%; P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

VADNA patients carry a higher risk of recurrent arterial events compared with those with FMD. This difference was primarily driven by recurrent dissections.

Isolated Dissections of Superior Mesenteric and Celiac Arteries Associated With Aortic Ectasia

Arterial dissection is defined as a tear in the inner lining of arteries, leading to the passage of blood between the layers and resulting in a false lumen. Arterial dissection involving the aorta is commonly seen in clinical practice; however, dissections involving the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries are quite rare. Even rare are isolated multiple visceral arterial dissections. A 59-year-old male with uncontrolled hypertension presented with epigastric pain. CT angiography revealed isolated dissection of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries with ascending aortic ectasia, with no features of ischemia or organ dysfunction. He was managed conservatively with analgesics & anticoagulation. Repeat CT angiography after six months of anticoagulation therapy showed no progression of the disease. Isolated multiple visceral arterial dissection is a rare vascular disease that requires a high index of suspicion to diagnose. CT angiography is a useful imaging modality that helps not only in diagnosis but also in choosing a treatment plan. Though treatment options are controversial, conservative treatment with anticoagulation should be considered in uncomplicated cases of visceral arterial dissections.

Natural course of incidentally detected isolated Celiac Artery Dissection with hepatic artery occlusion

Isolated celiac artery dissection (ICAD) is a rare entity with over 160 cases described in literature. We report a case of incidentally detected isolated celiac artery dissection during computed tomography evaluation for occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Though most cases of isolated celiac artery dissection are initially managed conservatively with antiplatelet and anticoagulants, some patients may require endovascular or occasionally surgical treatment. In our case, the celiac artery dissection had already progressed to cause hepatic artery occlusion and secondary collateral formation in the porta hepatis region. We retrospectively analyze the natural course of celiac artery dissection with hepatic artery occlusion in an asymptomatic patient for over 3 years.

Clinical Features of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of Abdominal Visceral Arteries

Background

Spontaneous isolated dissection of abdominal visceral arteries without aortic dissection is rare and its pathology and prognosis are not yet clear; therefore, therapeutic strategies for this disease have not been established. The present multi-institution investigational study analyzed the clinical features of patients with spontaneous isolated dissection of abdominal visceral arteries.

Methods

A total of 36 patients diagnosed as spontaneous isolated dissection of abdominal visceral arteries from January 2010 to October 2016 were enrolled. The medical data of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging characteristics were evaluated. Spontaneous isolated dissection of abdominal visceral arteries was detected on upper abdominal computed tomography examination in almost patients, and was detected on magnetic resonance imaging in one patient.

Results

Of the 36 cases, 26 cases involved the superior mesenteric artery dissection, nine involved the celiac artery, two involved the splenic artery, one involved the common hepatic artery, one involved the gastroduodenal artery and one involved the left gastric artery. Among the 36 patients, 20 had hypertension and 14 were current smokers. Additionally, only one patient had diabetes and four patients had dyslipidemia. Moreover, 32 cases complained of pain including abdominal pain and back pain, one had cough and three had no symptoms. Of the 36 patients, 34 cases (94.4%) were treated conservatively, and two (5.6%) required intravascular treatment. All patients were discharged without complications.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that hypertension and smoking might be closely involved in the pathogenesis of spontaneous isolated dissection of abdominal visceral arteries, whereas dyslipidemia and diabetes might be less involved. Additionally, few asymptomatic patients were accidentally diagnosed, indicating that the absence of symptoms cannot be used to rule out the presence of this disease. Randomized clinical trials cannot be performed because a considerable number of cases are required. Therefore, detailed descriptions of clinical features, as provided in our report, are important.

Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes in Management of Spontaneous Isolated Coeliac Artery Dissection (SICAD)

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous Isolated Coeliac Artery Dissection (SICAD) is a rare disease with few reports of management strategies. This study reports the mid- to long-term outcomes of conservative management and endovascular intervention of SICAD treatment.

METHODS

Sixteen patients presenting with symptomatic SICAD from September 2006 to October 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical manifestations, initial radiological findings, methods of treatment, and serial follow up studies were analysed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 51.2 ± 7.9 years, with a median follow up of 33.3 (range 1.0-118.9) months. Four patients received early intervention because of aneurysmal dilatation or distal hypoperfusion. Four patients who received conservative management showed progression of disease and were recommended for delayed intervention. Although collaterals prevented further hepatic ischaemia, one of these four patients failed in delayed intervention because of extensive thrombi completely occluding the hepatic artery. In the remaining eight patients who were managed conservatively, three (37.5%) showed regression of disease, one (12.5%) showed partial regression, and five (62.5%) showed no change in intimal flap or thrombosis, but all had symptomatic improvement. The median follow up duration for the seven patients who underwent successful intervention was 77.3 (range 34.3-118.9) months, and all stenting remained patent during the follow up period.

CONCLUSION

Early intervention in symptomatic SICAD patients may be necessary in over 50% of patients, and endovascular stenting has durable long term outcomes.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence in spontaneous isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) and spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) represent the major types of spontaneous visceral artery dissection. However, no quantitative meta-analysis of SICAD and SISMAD is available. The aim of our study was to pool current evidence concerning basic profiles, treatment strategies, long-term adverse events, and morphologic changes of lesioned vessels in SICAD and SISMAD patients.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Databases (January 1, 1946-September 21, 2017) for studies of SICAD and SISMAD. Related cohort studies or case series with sample size larger than 10 were included. Two reviewers independently extracted and summarized the data. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates.

RESULTS

In total, 43 studies were included. An estimated 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.21) symptomatic SICAD and 12% (95% CI, 0.06-0.19) symptomatic SISMAD patients with initial conservative management required secondary intervention during follow-up, whereas none of the asymptomatic patients treated conservatively required secondary intervention. As for morphologic changes during follow-up, a higher proportion of SICAD patients (64%; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) achieved complete remodeling compared with SISMAD patients (25%; 95% CI, 0.19-0.32), and an estimated 6% (95% CI, 0.00-0.16) of SICAD and 12% (95% CI, 0.05-0.20) of SISMAD patients had morphologic progression. Overall, the pooled estimate of long-term all-cause mortality was 0% (95% CI, 0.00-0.03) in SICAD and 1% (95% CI, 0.00-0.02) in SISMAD. When stratified by symptoms, symptomatic patients were associated with a significantly increased probability of accomplishing complete remodeling (odds ratio, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.31-11.85) compared with asymptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial conservative treatment is safe for asymptomatic SICAD or SISMAD patients. Symptomatic patients managed conservatively have relatively high occurrence of late secondary intervention, which may require closer surveillance, especially in SISMAD because of a lower rate of remodeling.

Follow-up with computed tomography after spontaneous isolated dissection of the splanchnic artery

The aim of this study was to evaluate radiological changes after spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SIDSMA) and spontaneous isolated dissection of the celiac artery (SIDCA) using computed tomography (CT). This single-center retrospective study was approved by the hospital institutional review board. We reviewed the medical records and morphological CT findings of 33 consecutive patients with SIDSMA or SIDCA who were diagnosed between January 2001 and February 2016. We analyzed changes on follow-up CT images including length of the dissection, presence of a thrombus in the false lumen, maximal outer diameter, degree of luminal stenosis, patency of distal flow, and end-organ injury. We classified short-term (within the first week) and long-term (between the first week and sixth month) follow-up groups and analyzed differences in radiological changes over time using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (continuous variables) and Fisher exact probability tests (categorical variables). Additionally, we examined patients who completed follow-up CT within 3 days after symptomatic changes. Comparing initial and final CT findings, a majority of patients with SIDSMA and SIDCA showed no significant changes in most CT parameters, including dissection length, thrombus presence, dissection diameter, stenosis degree, and extended distal branch. Between the short-term and long-term CT follow-up groups, there were no significant differences in radiological changes except for in the degree of luminal stenosis at the dissected segment in SIDSMA (P = 0.043). Only 10 patients completed follow-up CT within 3 days after symptomatic changes (progression or regression); of these, 1 patient had radiological findings that matched symptom progression, showing an increase in the degree of luminal stenosis and end-organ injury. There was no splanchnic artery dissection-related mortality, symptom progression, or event recurrence. In conclusion, CT follow-up of SIDSMA and SIDCA was mainly useful in the acute phase of dissection, with no significant radiological changes occurring in the long term. Accordingly, we question the utility of long-term follow-up CT after spontaneous isolated arterial dissection, especially in the absence of symptom progression.

Natural history of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection after conservative treatment

OBJECTIVE

Optimal treatment of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is not well established because the natural history of this rare disease is poorly understood. We analyzed the natural history of patients who underwent conservative treatment.

METHODS

The study included 28 patients with SICAD from December 2008 to January 2017. Our institutional policy of first-line treatment for SICAD patients was conservative, and invasive procedures were reserved for unstable complications such as severe persistent pain, significant organ malperfusion, rapid aneurysmal change, and rupture or concealed rupture. Demographics, clinical features, morphologic characteristics on computed tomography, treatment modalities, and follow-up results of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 52 years, and 89% of patients were male; 86% presented with pain, mostly abdominal, and 14% of cases were detected incidentally on abdominal imaging. None of these patients had unstable complications on admission, and all underwent initial conservative treatment. During the follow-up period (22 ± 20 months), aneurysmal change and propagation of thrombosis were noted in one patient and two patients, respectively, all of whom were managed conservatively without adverse clinical events. No difference in clinical and morphologic outcomes was noted between patients who were treated with antihypertensive therapy and those who were not. Patients with intramural hematoma on initial images showed dynamic vascular remodeling (partial to complete resorption) during the follow-up period compared with patients who had dominant intimal flap on initial images.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical course of patients with SICAD was benign. Even progressive vascular changes during follow-up did not require invasive treatment. Antihypertensive therapy might not modify the clinical course. The short-term results of conservative management are encouraging, but further evaluation with long-term follow-up in a large population is needed.

Natural course and outcomes of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection according to morphological findings on computed tomography angiography: STROBE compliant article

We aimed to identify natural course and optimal management of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) according to morphologic classification determined on computed tomography angiography (CTA), and to investigate the association between symptoms and morphological classification of SICAD.This retrospective observational study included 21 consecutive patients with SICAD from January 2012 to April 2017. Demographic data, clinical features, treatment modalities, follow-up results, and CTA findings including morphologic classification, dissection length, and relative diameter of the true lumen (TLRD) were reviewed. Changes in follow-up CTA were recorded and compared to prior studies to reveal natural course of the disease.The serial changes of SICAD on follow-up CTA according to morphologic classifications were as follows; type I (5/5, no interval change), type IIa (1/1, no interval change), type IIb (1/1, partial remodeling), type IIIa (1/4, complete remodeling; 1/4, partial remodeling; 1/4, no interval change; 1/4, deterioration), type IIIb (4/6, no interval change; 2/6, partial remodeling), and type IV (2/2, no interval change). Thirteen (61.9%) symptomatic and 8 (38.1%) asymptomatic patients were all treated with conservative management with or without antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapies. Symptomatic group (SG) more commonly had type IIb, IIIa, IIIb, and IV than asymptomatic group (AG) (SG; 11 patients, AG; 1 patient, P = .002). TLRD in AG was larger than that in SG (SG: 40.5 ± 24.1%, AG: 61.7 ± 7.0%, P = .045).SICAD might be treated by conservative management in stable patients irrespective of the morphologic classification except for with type IV (dissecting aneurysm) and extension of celiac branch who may need an early intervention. Types IIb, IIIa, IIIb, and IV are TLRD are associated with patients' symptoms. Further studies on extended natural course of SICAD with a larger number of subjects are needed to draw a strong conclusion.

Ten-year review of isolated spontaneous mesenteric arterial dissections

OBJECTIVE

Isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac artery (CA) remains a rare condition; however, it has been increasingly noted incidentally on diagnostic imaging. The purpose of this study was to examine the natural history and outcomes of patients presenting with isolated spontaneous mesenteric artery dissection (SMAD). We hypothesized that most SMADs can be treated nonoperatively.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of patients presenting with the diagnosis of SMAD between 2006 and 2016. Data analysis included demographics, clinical data, radiologic review, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were found to have CA dissection, SMA dissection, or both in the absence of aortic dissection diagnosed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The average age was 56 years (range, 26-86 years), 80% were male, and 10 patients (13%) had underlying connective tissue disorders. The majority, 64%, presented with symptoms including abdominal pain, back pain, and chest pain; the remaining 36% were asymptomatic. Combined SMA and CA dissection was found in 14 (18%) patients; 33 (43%) presented with isolated CA dissection, and 30 (39%) presented with isolated SMA dissection. Only four patients required intervention. Mesenteric bypass was performed in two patients, and SMA endarterectomy with patch angioplasty was performed in one patient for signs of bowel ischemia. No patient required bowel resection. The two bypasses were anastomosed to a branch of the SMA, and complete lumen restoration was seen on long-term imaging follow-up. One patient underwent stent grafting of the CA and hepatic artery for aneurysmal degeneration 1 month after diagnosis. The remaining 73 patients were managed nonoperatively; 40 (52%) were treated with a short course of anticoagulation, 23 (30%) were treated with antiplatelet therapy, and 10 (13%) were treated with observation alone. No other late interventions or recurrences were noted during a mean follow-up of 21 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas isolated SMAD poses a risk of visceral ischemia, most patients presenting with this diagnosis can be treated nonoperatively with a short course of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Only a small number of patients require surgical revascularization for bowel ischemia.

Real clinical management of patients with isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection in Japan

BACKGROUND

Due to the rarity of this condition, clinical treatment and outcomes in isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD) patients remain unknown. The primary aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to elucidate the treatment strategies and in-hospital outcomes for ISMAD patients by using administrative data.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients that were primarily diagnosed with ISMAD using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination data collected at 141 hospitals in Japan in 2015. Patients with comorbidities that included "aneurysm" were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 221 ISMAD without aneurysm patients (male: 90.5%; mean age: 52.5±10.1 years) were enrolled, and 95 (67.4%) of these encountered just one ISMAD case per year. We found only one (0.5%) in-hospital death and length of stay for ISMAD patients was 13.2±9.1 days. One-third of patients received antiplatelet therapy (32.1%) and anticoagulation therapies, such as heparin (38.9%) and warfarin (10.0%). A total of 146 (66.1%) patients received antihypertensive treatment (either orally or via an intravenous route) during hospitalization. Twelve (5.4%) patients underwent surgical procedures during hospitalization as follows: 4 (33.3%) patients underwent bypass surgery, 3 (25.0%) patients underwent exploratory laparotomies, 2 (16.7%) patients underwent bowel resection, 1 (8.3%) patient underwent a thrombectomy, and 2 (16.7%) patients underwent surgical angioplasties.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that conservative therapy for ISMAD patients without aneurysm is safe and is also associated with a low rate of surgical intervention in clinical practice.

Presentation, treatment, and outcomes in patients with spontaneous isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissection

Spontaneous isolated celiac or superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection (SICMAD) is a rare clinical entity. Not much is known about the natural history and appropriate treatment. We retrospectively queried a prospectively collected institutional radiology database for all patients diagnosed with SICMAD from 1990 to 2017. We identified 42 arteries in 40 patients (83.3% male), mean age 54.8 ± 10.9 years, consisting of 24 celiac arteries and 18 SMA. SMA lesions were longer than celiac lesions (5.15 ± 3.81 vs 2.38 ± 1.40 cm, p = 0.008). Thirty-one patients had follow-up; mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 4.8 years. Morphologic improvement was seen in 20 (48%) arteries. Sakamoto IV lesions were more likely to remodel (OR: 11.26, 95% CI: 1.13, 588.26, p = 0.039), and Sakamoto II lesions less likely to remodel (OR: 0, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.93, p = 0.05). Patients received an average of 2.35 scans during follow-up. Symptom resolution occurred in all symptomatic patients, and 16% of patients had recurrence of symptoms. Follow-up CT scans revealed a stable arterial diameter for the majority of patients. In conclusion, the majority of patients with SICMAD improve with medical therapy alone. Aneurysmal dilatation is uncommon.

Effectiveness of the conservative therapy for spontaneous isolated iliac artery dissection: Preliminary results

Purpose To investigate the effectiveness of conservative therapy for spontaneous isolated iliac artery dissection (SIIAD). Methods From February 2006 to May 2016, all patients with SIIAD were included and analyzed. The diagnosis of SIIAD was made based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The imaging morphologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for each patient were analyzed. Results A total of 11 patients (10 male and 1 female, age 71.1 ± 7.8 years) were included in this study. Of the 11 patients, 8 patients were asymptomatic and the SIIADs were discovered during the course of computed tomography for other diseases, and 3 patients were symptomatic. Initial computed tomography findings: iliac arterial calcification ( n = 7); compression of the true lumen ( n = 6), with stenosis of the true lumen from 25% to 50% ( n = 3) and ≥ 50% ( n = 3); thrombosed false lumen partially ( n = 4), and no thrombosis in false lumen ( n = 7); dissecting aneurysm ( n = 11); entry points ( n = 11); re-entry points ( n = 1); no dissection extended to the internal iliac or common femoral artery. Conservative treatment was performed in six patients, and the remaining five patients need no treatment. During 23.3 ± 14.2 months follow-up, none recurred symptoms and signs of symptomatic SIIAD; partial remodeling of SIIAD was achieved in four patients, and the remaining seven patients with no change of SIIAD. There was no presence of new false lumen enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography during follow-up. Conclusions SIIAD without arterial rupture or lower limb necrosis can be safely treated with conservative therapy.

Clinical presentation, management, follow-up, and outcomes of isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissections

OBJECTIVE

Isolated visceral artery dissections are rare entities with no current consensus guidelines for treatment and follow-up. This study aims to evaluate the presentation, management, outcomes, and follow-up practices for patients with isolated visceral artery dissections and to compare those with and without symptoms.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we identified all patients with isolated celiac artery and/or isolated superior mesenteric artery dissections at a single institution between September 2006 and December 2014. Patients with concomitant aortic dissections were excluded. Cases were stratified by symptom status. Presentation, anatomic findings, treatment, outcomes, and follow-up imaging were then compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

RESULTS

We identified 25 patients including 15 with symptoms and 10 without. There were no differences in patient comorbidities; however, symptomatic patients more frequently presented with thrombus (n = 10; 67% vs n = 1; 10%; P = .01) and inflammation (n = 8; 53% vs n = 1; 10%; P = .04), and trended toward increased stenosis (n = 12; 80% vs n = 4; 40%; P = .09) compared with asymptomatic patients. All asymptomatic patients were treated with observation alone with vessel diameter enlargement noted in 33% (n = 2) of patients on follow-up imaging. Among symptomatic patients, standard treatment included a short course of anticoagulation (mean, 4.5 months) with lifelong antiplatelet therapy. Three patients underwent operative intervention for persistent or worsening symptoms, two during the index admission and one 10 months after presentation for chronic abdominal pain. Approximately 70% (n = 17) of patients in each group had follow-up imaging (computed tomography angiography: n = 14; 56%; magnetic resonance angiography: n = 4; 16%; ultrasound: n = 13; 52%). Among patients treated nonoperatively, no patients complained of symptoms at follow-up, and 50% of those with inflammation on initial imaging had resolution. Twenty-five percent (n = 4) of patients had an increase in vessel size; however, all vessels remained less than 2 cm in maximal diameter. There were no ruptures or related deaths in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with visceral artery dissection, no ruptures occurred but diameter enlargement was documented. This disease progression suggests that routine surveillance may be appropriate; however, transitioning early to ultrasound imaging should be considered to decrease radiation, contrast, and associated costs.