Outcomes after open infrainguinal bypass in patients with scleroderma

The treatment effect of endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia with systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a collagen disease with immune abnormalities, vasculopathy, and fibrosis. Ca blockers and prostaglandins are used to treat peripheral circulatory disturbances. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a disease characterized by extremity ulcers, necrosis, and pain due to limb ischemia. Since only a few patients present with coexistence of CLTI and SSc, the treatment outcomes of revascularization in these cases are unknown. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of seven patients with CLTI and SSc, and 35 patients with uncomplicated CLTI who were hospitalized from 2012 to 2022. A higher proportion of patients with uncomplicated CLTI had diabetes and male. There were no significant differences in the age at which ischemic ulceration occurred, other comorbidities, or in treatments, including antimicrobial agents, revascularization and amputation, improvement of pain, and the survival time from ulcer onset between the two subgroups. EVT or amputation was performed in six or two of the seven patients with CLTI and SSc, respectively. Among those who underwent EVT, 33% (2/6) achieved epithelialization and 67% (4/6) experienced pain relief. These results suggest that the revascularization in cases with CLTI and SSc should consider factors such as infection and general condition, since revascularization improve the pain of these patients.

Clinical outcomes of chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to inflammatory nonatherosclerotic versus atherosclerotic etiologies undergoing revascularization

BACKGROUND

The scope of clinical guidelines for the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is limited to atherosclerotic disease of the lower-extremity arteries. This study aimed to reveal the clinical features and prognoses of CLTI due to inflammatory nonatherosclerotic etiologies undergoing revascularization.

METHODS

DECOPON (DatabasE of ChrOnic limb-threatening ischemia Presenting ischemic ulcer and gangrene due to nON-atherosclerotic disease) is a multicenter retrospective study that evaluated 465 limbs of 414 patients with CLTI undergoing revascularization for ischemic tissue loss with inflammatory nonatherosclerotic etiologies between 2010 and 2020. Clinical features and prognoses were compared with 930 limbs of 809 patients with atherosclerotic CLTI during the same period.

RESULTS

The frequency of conventional atherosclerotic risk factors was significantly lower in the inflammatory nonatherosclerotic group. The inflammatory nonatherosclerotic group had more severe WIfI (wound, ischemia, and foot infection) W and fI grades, and more frequent infrapopliteal and inframalleolar artery diseases with a rarer presence of arterial calcification (all p < 0.05). Adjunctive therapy was more frequently performed in the inflammatory nonatherosclerotic group (p < 0.05). The inflammatory nonatherosclerotic group had a lower incidence rate of wound healing (0.64-fold, p < 0.001) and a higher incidence rate of major reintervention (2.30-fold, p = 0.006), whereas the risk ratio of all-cause mortality was 0.83-fold (p = 0.067). The association of inflammatory nonatherosclerotic disease with the delayed wound healing and the susceptibility to major reintervention remained significant even after adjustment for covariates (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient, limb, and lesion characteristics of inflammatory nonatherosclerotic CLTI were considerably different from those of atherosclerotic CLTI. Inflammatory nonatherosclerotic CLTI was less likely to heal than atherosclerotic CLTI.

Long-term outcomes after autogenous versus synthetic lower extremity bypass in patients on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis dependence confers unique physiologic conditions. Prior reports of outcomes after infrainguinal open bypass operations in patients on hemodialysis have been based on relatively small sample institutional series. In this study, we evaluate long-term outcomes after open bypass operations in a large contemporary population-based cohort of hemodialysis patients. We studied all hemodialysis patients who underwent infrainguinal open operation using autogenous versus prosthetic conduits in the United States Renal Data System between January 2007 and December 2011.

METHODS

Univariate methods (χ², analysis of variance) were used to compare the characteristics of the patient and type of bypass. Kaplan-Meier, univariate and multivariate logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate 30-day postoperative outcomes as well as patency, limb salvage, and mortality in the long term.

RESULTS

There were 9,739 (autogenous: 59%, prosthetic: 49%) infrainguinal open bypass operations performed in this cohort. Of these, 4,717 (48%) were femoral-popliteal, 3,321 (34%) were femoral-tibial, and 1,701 (18%) were popliteal-tibial bypasses. Bypass operations were performed most commonly for critical limb ischemia (72%). Primary patency was 18% for both types of conduits at 5 years (P = .16). Comparing autogenous versus prosthetic conduits, primary-assisted patency was 23% vs 20% at 5 years (P = .98), while secondary patency was 30% for both conduits at 5 years (P = .05). Limb salvage was 35% vs 41% at 5 years (P < .001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated greater patency (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.28; P = .003) and limb salvage (aHR: 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.24; P = .03) for autogenous compared to prosthetic bypasses. The advantage conferred by autogenous conduits was most clinically relevant for femoral-tibial (aHR: 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.55; P < .001) and popliteal-tibial (aHR: 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.21; P = .014) configurations.

CONCLUSION

This large study evaluated the long-term outcomes of open bypass operations in patients on hemodialysis. The data confirm the long-term benefits of autogenous conduits compared with prosthetic conduits in this high-risk population of patients, especially for the treatment of distal lesions. Individual patient life expectancy, availability of adequate autogenous conduit options, indication for operation, level of disease, as well as potential need for future options for additional access for dialysis should be taken into consideration when deciding to construct an open bypass in a hemodialysis patient.