Survival trends after inferior vena cava and aortic injuries in the United States

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Penetrating Aortic Trauma

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) reduced mortality for blunt aortic injury (BAI) from 30-50% to < 10%; however, traumatic penetrating aortic injury (PAI) remains highly lethal (>40% mortality). This study's goal is to determine outcomes of TEVAR for PAI.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TEVAR for traumatic aortic injuries were identified from the Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2011 to 2022. Patients with blunt and penetrating injuries were compared based on preoperative characteristics, injury severity, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

TEVAR was performed for 1,867 patients with traumatic aortic injuries, of which 1,808 (96.9%) patients had BAI and 59 (3.1%) had PAI. The majority of injuries being treated were either grade 3 (pseudoaneurysm) (55.3%) or grade 4 (transection) (16.4%). PAI patients had a higher proportion of grade 4 injuries compared to BAI (36.4% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.001). The majority of PAI were in zones 4-5 (61.1% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.001), whereas the majority of BAI were in zone 3 (66.5% vs. 16.7%, P < 0.001). Overall, the mortality rate was 8.2% (N = 154). In hospital mortality was 8.5% in the PAI group and 8.2% in the BAI group (P = 0.813). There was no significant difference in major complication rates between PAI and BAI patients.

CONCLUSION

PAI occurs more commonly in zones 4-5 of the thoracic aorta and often presents with higher grade aortic injury when compared to BAI. TEVAR for PAI provides excellent in-hospital survival, especially compared to historical mortality rates around 40%. An endovascular first approach may lead to improved survival for PAI.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Trauma

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with vascular trauma with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the optimal management strategy.

METHODS

The guidelines are based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to the ESVS evidence grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III, and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 105 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: general principles for vascular trauma care and resuscitation including technical skill sets, bleeding control and restoration of perfusion, graft materials, and imaging; management of vascular trauma in the neck, thoracic aorta and thoracic outlet, abdomen, and upper and lower extremities; post-operative considerations after vascular trauma; and paediatric vascular trauma. In addition, unresolved vascular trauma issues and the patients' perspectives are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS clinical practice guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, evidence based advice to clinicians on the management of vascular trauma.

Cavo-Atrial Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Restoration With Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft: Overcoming Lethal Injuries

Injuries to the inferior vena cava (IVC) carry high risks and mortality rates. We present a case of suprahepatic IVC injury that was successfully treated with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft insertion without cardiopulmonary bypass. A 46-year-old woman was transferred to our trauma centre after a high-speed motor vehicle collision. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a suprahepatic IVC injury with an expanding hematoma within the diaphragmatic muscle. Via a thoracoabdominal approach, total vascular occlusion allowed evacuating the hematoma under control to allow IVC injury assessment. A large defect in the suprahepatic IVC was noted with a near-complete transection at the level of the hepatocaval confluence. A PTFE graft was successfully inserted restoring continuity between the right atrium and hepatic veins. The patient recovered and remains well two years post-trauma. Injuries to the IVC are uncommon and often fatal. Effective coordination between specialties can facilitate positive outcomes even in the most complex clinical scenarios. IVC injuries may be survivable when managed at high-volume expert centres with intensive care, anaesthesia, and surgical expertise.

Treatment of penetrating injuries of the retrohepatic vena cava: systematic review protocol

Injuries to the retrohepatic segment of the inferior vena cava require complex procedures, as exposure without prior vascular control can lead to uncontrollable and fatal bleeding. To achieve such control, the classic techniques of hepatic vascular exclusion and the implantation of an atriocaval shunt have been described, and more recently, endovascular strategies have been reported. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding which of these strategies is associated with lower mortality. In order to determine which therapeutic strategy presents the lowest mortality and complication rates in the treatment of penetrating injuries to the retrohepatic segment of the inferior vena cava, a systematic review of the literature will be conducted, registered on the PROSPERO platform under the number CRD42023464133. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions will guide the process. Searches will be carried out in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) will be consulted to detect ongoing or unpublished trials. Studies will be selected based on a predefined search strategy, the number of results will be filtered using the Rayyan app, and the studies included will be independently reviewed by two authors to reach a final consensus. The qualitative analysis of the studies will be conducted using the RoB 1.0 tool.

Gunshot wound causing penetrating injury to the inferior vena cava treated with open cell self-expanding stents

Endovascular stents are predominantly utilized for intra-arterial interventions; however, their application in managing venous injuries, especially traumatic ones, lacks comprehensive guidelines and long-term outcome studies. This case report discusses the innovative deployment of an infrarenal inferior vena cava stent for a traumatic inferior vena cava injury after a gunshot wound in a polytrauma patient. This case aims to enhance the existing evidence on the feasibility and potential outcomes of endovascular stenting in traumatic venous injuries.

Management of gunshot injury to the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava: a case report of a combat patient wounded in the Russo-Ukrainian war

BACKGROUND

Russo-Ukrainian war is associated with severe traumas, including injuries to the major vessels. Penetrating aortic injury remains one of the most difficult injuries; the mortality rate is 90-100% in case of gunshot wounds, associated with frequent lethal outcomes due to uncontrolled bleeding. Of the three main abdominal veins, the inferior vena cava (IVC) is the most frequently damaged, which is required quick and appropriate surgical decisions to be made. Little is known about the management of gunshot injuries to such major vessels as the aorta and IVC. It is also worth mentioning about the importance to share our practical experience from the ongoing war for better understanding and future considerations by war surgeons of the vascular trauma management. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the specific features of the diagnosis and management of a gunshot shrapnel blind penetrating wound to the abdomen with injury to the aortic bifurcation level and the infrarenal section of the inferior vena cava.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 44-year-old male soldier of the Armed Forces of Ukraine received a gunshot injury to the abdomen from a mortars' explosive shelling. The patient was evacuated to the Forward Surgical Team (Role 1) and received primary surgical treatment within one hour after the injury according to the "golden hour" principle. Then, evacuated was performed to the Role 3 hospital in Kharkiv. At the Role 3 hospital, the patient underwent second-look surgery as well as damage control surgery. At revision, no active bleeding was observed, and the surgical pads (packed previously by the Forward Surgical Team) were removed. Further revision showed a metal projectile within the aortic wall at the level of aortic bifurcation and wall defects were also detected for inferior vena cava. This metal projectile was removed by using the multifunctional surgical magnetic tool followed by suturing of the aortic wall defect as well as defects of the inferior vena cava.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of Damage Control Surgery is a useful approach in the management of severe vascular injury as well as useful to stop abdominal contamination by intestinal contents. The application of a surgical magnetic tool for the searching and removal of ferromagnetic foreign bodies reduces operative trauma and reduces the time for identification of foreign bodies.

CTA Imaging of Peripheral Arterial Injuries

Traumatic vascular injuries consist of direct or indirect damage to arteries and/or veins and account for 3% of all traumatic injuries. Typical consequences are hemorrhage and ischemia. Vascular injuries of the extremities can occur isolated or in association with major trauma and other organ injuries. They account for 1-2% of patients admitted to emergency departments and for approximately 50% of all arterial injuries. Lower extremities are more frequently injured than upper ones in the adult population. The outcome of vascular injuries is strictly correlated to the environment and the time background. Treatment can be challenging, notably in polytrauma because of the dilemma of which injury should be prioritized, and treatment delay can cause disability or even death, especially for limb vascular injury. Our purposes are to discuss the role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of vascular trauma and its optimized protocol to achieve a definitive diagnosis and to assess the radiological signs of vascular injuries and the possible pitfalls.

Torso hemorrhage: noncompressible? never say never

Since limb bleeding has been well managed by extremity tourniquets, the management of exsanguinating torso hemorrhage (TH) has become a hot issue both in military and civilian medicine. Conventional hemostatic techniques are ineffective for managing traumatic bleeding of organs and vessels within the torso due to the anatomical features. The designation of noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) marks a significant step in investigating the injury mechanisms and developing effective methods for bleeding control. Special tourniquets such as abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet and SAM junctional tourniquet designed for NCTH have been approved by FDA for clinical use. Combat ready clamp and junctional emergency treatment tool also exhibit potential for external NCTH control. In addition, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) further provides an endovascular solution to alleviate the challenges of NCTH treatment. Notably, NCTH cognitive surveys have revealed that medical staff have deficiencies in understanding relevant concepts and treatment abilities. The stereotypical interpretation of NCTH naming, particularly the term noncompressible, is the root cause of this issue. This review discusses the dynamic relationship between TH and NCTH by tracing the development of external NCTH control techniques. The authors propose to further subdivide the existing NCTH into compressible torso hemorrhage and NCTH' (noncompressible but REBOA controllable) based on whether hemostasis is available via external compression. Finally, due to the irreplaceability of special tourniquets during the prehospital stage, the authors emphasize the importance of a package program to improve the efficacy and safety of external NCTH control. This program includes the promotion of tourniquet redesign and hemostatic strategies, personnel reeducation, and complications prevention.

Treatment of a penetrating inferior vena cava injury using doctor-helicopter emergency medical service and direct-to-operating room resuscitation in Korea: a case report

Inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries can have fatal outcomes and are associated with high mortality rates. Patients with IVC injuries require multiple procedures, including prehospital care, surgical techniques, and postoperative care. We present the case of a 67-year-old woman who stabbed herself in the abdomen with a knife, resulting in an infrarenal IVC injury. We shortened the transfer time by transporting the patient using a helicopter and decided to perform direct-to-operating room resuscitation by a trauma physician in the helicopter. The patient underwent laparotomy with IVC ligation for damage control during the first operation. The second- and third-look operations, including previous suture removal, IVC reconstruction, and IVC thrombectomy, were performed by a trauma surgeon specializing in cardiovascular diseases. The patient was discharged without major complications on the 19th postoperative day with rivaroxaban as an anticoagulant medication. Computed tomography angiography at the outpatient clinic showed that thrombi in the IVC and both iliac veins had been completely removed. Patients with IVC injuries can be effectively treated using a trauma system that includes fast transportation by helicopter, damage control for rapid hemostasis, and expert treatment of IVC injuries.

Brazilian guidelines on diagnosis and management of traumatic vascular injuries

Trauma is a leading cause of death, permanent disability, and health care cost worldwide. The young and economically active are the most affected population. Exsanguination due to noncompressible torso hemorrhage is one of the most frequent causes of early death, posing a significant challenge to trauma and vascular surgeons. The possibility of limb loss due to vascular injuries must also be considered. In recent decades, the approach to vascular injuries has been significantly modified. Angiotomography has become the standard method for diagnosis, endovascular techniques are currently incorporated in treatment, and damage control, such as temporary shunts, is now the preferred approach for the patients sustaining physiological derangement. Despite the importance of this topic, few papers in the Brazilian literature have offered guidelines on vascular trauma. The Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery has developed Projetos Diretrizes (Guideline Projects), which includes this publication on vascular trauma. Since treating trauma patients is a multidisciplinary effort, the Brazilian Trauma Society (SBAIT) was invited to participate in this project. Members of both societies reviewed the literature on vascular trauma management and together wrote these guidelines on vascular injuries of neck, thorax, abdomen, and extremities.

Risk Factors and Management of Blunt Inferior Vena Cava Injury: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries are uncommon, but the mortality rate remains high at 38-70%. To date, most studies on traumatic IVC injuries have evaluated blunt rather than penetrating injuries. We aimed to identify the clinical features and risk factors that affect the prognosis of patients with blunt IVC injuries to improve treatment strategies for these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with blunt IVC injury over 8 years at a single trauma center. Clinical and biochemical parameters; transfusion, surgical, and resuscitation methods; associated injuries; intensive care unit stay; and complications data were compared between survival and death groups to identify clinical features and risk factors of blunt IVC injury-related mortality.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with blunt IVC injury were included during the study periods. Twenty-five (89%) patients underwent surgical treatment, and the mortality was 54%. The mortality rate according to the IVC injury location was the lowest for supra-hepatic IVC injury (25%, n = 2/8), whereas it was the highest for retrohepatic IVC injury (80%, n = 4/5). In the logistic regression analysis, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.566, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.322-0.993], p = 0.047) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion for 24 h (OR = 1.132, 95% CI [0.996-1.287], p = 0.058) were independent predictors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Low GCS score and high-volume packed RBC transfusion requirements for 24 h were significant predictors of mortality in patients with blunt IVC injuries. Unlike IVC injuries caused by penetrating trauma, supra-hepatic IVC injuries caused by blunt trauma have a good prognosis.

Effect of the Profit and Teaching Status of Hospitals on the Patterns and Outcomes of Abdominal Aorta and Inferior Vena Cava Injuries after Severe Abdominal Trauma

Background

The inferior vena cava (IVC) and the abdominal aorta (AA) are two important blood vessels located in the abdomen. The outcomes of such injuries rely heavily on the experience, expertise, and resources available at the hospital where the patient is treated. However, our current understanding of the potential impact of the hospital profit and teaching status on surgical outcomes in the context of traumatic injuries to the IVC and AA remains limited, making it important to investigate the potential association between these hospital characteristics and patient outcomes to enhance the quality of care and optimize treatment strategies.

Objective

This study aimed to compare demographics, trauma characteristics, and outcomes between nonprofit status (NPSH) and for-profit hospital status (FPSH), as well as among community hospitals (CHs), nonteaching hospitals (NTHs), and university hospitals (UHs), in patients with severe abdominal trauma and abdominal aorta injury (AAI), inferior vena cava injury (IVCI), and both (AAI + IVCI).

Methods

Demographics, trauma, and outcome measures associated with AAI, IVCI, and AAI + IVCI were compared between the different profit and teaching status groups using NTDB. Multivariate regression was used to identify independent factors associated with death under care (DUC).

Results

In the 2017 NTDB-RDS, 1,479 patients met the inclusion criteria, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.17% for AAI, IVCI, and AAI + IVCI after severe abdominal trauma. More patients died under care in the FPSH group than in the NPSH group (nonprofit vs. for-profit: 60.3% vs. 47.2%; P < 0.001). The results indicated that FPSH independently affected DUC. NTH had no significant effect on DUC; although the in-hospital complication rate varied with NTH, no independent association was observed.

Conclusions

The study findings demonstrated that in patients with severe abdominal trauma, including injuries to AAI, IVCI, or both (AAI + IVCI), the profit status of hospitals, rather than the teaching status, had a substantial influence on DUC. Future studies should examine differences in the volume of cases and levels of trauma centers to better understand how to improve patient outcomes in FPSH.

Nationwide Analysis of Penetrating Thoracic Aortic Injury: Injury Patterns, Management, and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating thoracic aortic injuries (PTAI) represent a rare form of thoracic trauma. Unlike blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI), only scarce data, included in small case series, are currently available for PTAI. The purpose of this study was to describe injury patterns, surgical management, and outcomes of patients with PTAI and compare to those with BTAI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 9-y retrospective cohort study (2007-2015) was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank. Patient demographics, injury profile, procedures performed, and patient outcomes were compared between the PTAI and BTAI group.

RESULTS

A total of 2714 patients with PTAI and 14,037 patients with BTAI were identified. Compared to BTAI, PTAI patients were younger (28 versus 42 y, P < 0.001), more often male (89.1% versus 71.7%, P < 0.001), and more likely to arrive without signs of life (27.6% versus 7.5%, P < 0.001). PTAI patients had less associated injuries, overall, compared to those with BTAI; however, were more likely to have injuries to the esophagus, diaphragm, and heart. Patients with PTAI were less likely to undergo endovascular (5.8% versus 30.5%, P < 0.001) or open surgical repair (3.0% versus 4.2%, P < 0.001) compared to BTAI. While the large majority of PTAI patients expired before their hospital arrival or in the emergency department, the in-hospital mortality rate among those who survivedemergency department stay was 43.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with PTAI present to the hospital without any signs of life, and their overall mortality rate is extremely high. Only a small portion of PTAI patients who survived the initial resuscitation period underwent surgical interventions for thoracic aortic injuries. Further studies are still warranted to clarify the indications and types of surgical interventions for PTAI.

Traumatic aortic injury from pellet gun: A case report

Acute traumatic aortic injuries are of the most lethal sequelae of penetrating thoracic injuries and require rapid detection and management. The American College of Radiology currently recommends the use of noncontrast CT, followed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) as the first-line imaging modalities when traumatic aortic injury is suspected. Direct signs of aortic injury on CTA include pseudoaneurysm, focal contour abnormality, intimal flap, intramural hematoma, an abrupt change in aortic caliber, and contrast extravasation. Aortic pseudoaneurysms are most often caused by blunt or penetrating trauma that results in damage to the vessel wall, turbulent blood flow, and formation of a surrounding hematoma contained by a wall of products from the clotting cascade. This wall is weaker than those of a true aneurysm and will ultimately rupture over time if not repaired. Traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysms are preferably treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair using a prosthetic stent graft. Here, we present a 44-yearold female with a history of homelessness, polysubstance use disorder, and HIV who presented to the emergency department after being found down. She reported being shot by a pellet gun, and physical examination revealed a penetrating left-sided chest wound that appeared to be several days old. A STAT CTA was obtained and revealed a hemopneumothorax and possible thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm. A left-sided chest tube was placed and the patient underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair through right femoral arterial access and tolerated the procedure well. The patient was placed on daily aspirin postoperatively and discharged on post-op day 5.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Trauma Anesthesiologist

Purpose of Review

With advances in technology and availability of handheld ultrasound probes, studies are focusing on the perioperative care of patients, but a limited number specifically on trauma patients. This review highlights recent findings from studies using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to improve the care of trauma patients.

Recent Findings

Major findings include the use of POCUS to assess volume status of trauma patients upon arrival to measure the major vasculature. Additionally, several studies have advanced the use of POCUS to identify pneumothorax in trauma patients. Finally, the ASA POCUS certification and ASRA expert guidelines are examples of international organizations establishing guidelines for utilization and training of anesthesiologists in the field of POCUS, which will be discussed.

Summary

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, and considerable resources being diverted to fight this global healthcare crisis, advances are being made in utilization of POCUS to aid the care of trauma patients.

Damage control in abdominal vascular trauma

In patients with abdominal trauma who require laparotomy, up to a quarter or a third will have a vascular injury. The venous structures mainly injured are the vena cava (29%) and the iliac veins (20%), and arterial vessels are the iliac arteries (16%) and the aorta (14%). The initial approach is performed following the ATLS principles. This manuscript aims to present the surgical approach to abdominal vascular trauma following damage control principles. The priority in a trauma laparotomy is bleeding control. Hemorrhages of intraperitoneal origin are controlled by applying pressure, clamping, packing, and retroperitoneal with selective pressure. After the temporary bleeding control is achieved, the compromised vascular structure must be identified, according to the location of the hematomas. The management of all lesions should be oriented towards the expeditious conclusion of the laparotomy, focusing efforts on the bleeding control and contamination, with a postponement of the definitive management. Their management of vascular injuries includes ligation, transient bypass, and packing of selected low-pressure vessels and bleeding surfaces. Subsequently, the unconventional closure of the abdominal cavity should be performed, preferably with negative pressure systems, to reoperate once the hemodynamic alterations and coagulopathy have been corrected to carry out the definitive management.

Lessons Learned From Treating 114 Inferior Vena Cava Injuries at a Limited Resources Environment - A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The inferior vena cava is the most frequently injured vascular structure in penetrating abdominal trauma. We aimed to review inferior vena cava injury cases treated at a limited resources facility and to discuss the surgical management for such injures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with inferior vena cava injuries who were treated at a single center between January 2011 and January 2020. Data pertaining to the following were assessed: demographic parameters, hypovolemic shock at admission, the distance that the patient had to be transported to reach the hospital, affected anatomical segment, treatment, concomitant injuries, complications, and mortality. Non-parametric data were analyzed using Fisher's exact, Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, or Kruskal-Wallis test, as applicable. The Student's t-test was used to assess parametric data. Moreover, multiple logistic regression analyses (including data of possible death-related variables) were performed. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05.

RESULTS

Among 114 patients with inferior vena cava injuries, 90.4% were male, and the majority were aged 20-29 years. Penetrating injuries accounted for 98.2% of the injuries, and the infrarenal segment was affected in 52.7% of the patients. Suturing was perfomed in 69.5% and cava ligation in 29.5% of the patients, and 1 patient with retrohepatic vena cava injury was managed non-operatively. The overall mortality was 52.6% with no case of compartment syndrome in the limbs. A total of 7.9% of the patients died during surgery.

CONCLUSION

The inferior vena cava is often injured by penetrating mechanisms, and the most frequently affected segment was the infrarenal segment. A higher probability of death was not associated with injury to a specific anatomical segment. Additionally, cava ligation was not related to an increased probability of compartment syndrome in the leg; therefore, prophylactic fasciotomy was not supported.

[Open abdominal trauma with inferior vena cava injury]

The authors report surgical treatment of a patient with a penetrating abdominal trauma followed by damage to inferior vena cava, liver, duodenum and pancreas, massive bleeding and large retroperitoneal hematoma. Suturing of inferior vena cava defect, liver and pancreas, Billroth II gastric resection, drainage of retroperitoneal space and abdominal cavity were carried out. Postoperative period was complicated by pneumonia and seroma in lesser sac that required percutaneous puncture. Antibiotic therapy was used postoperatively. The patient was discharged in 25 days after surgery.

High Mortality and Venous Thromboembolism Risk Following Major Penetrating Abdominal Venous Injuries

BACKGROUND

Penetrating injuries to the inferior vena cava and/or iliac veins are a source of hemorrhage but may also predispose patients to venous thromboembolism (VTE). We sought to determine the relationship between iliocaval injury, VTE and mortality.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for penetrating abdominal trauma from 2015-2017. Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics and outcomes based on presence of iliocaval injury. Multivariable analyses determined the effect of iliocaval injury on VTE and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 9,974 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma, 329 had iliocaval injury (3.3%). Iliocaval injury patients were more likely to have a firearm mechanism (83% vs. 43%, P < 0.001), concurrent head (P = 0.036), spinal cord (P < 0.001), and pelvic injuries (P < 0.001), and higher total injury severity score (median 20 vs. 8.0, P < 0.001). They were more likely to undergo 24-hr hemorrhage control surgery (69% vs. 17%, P < 0.001), but less likely to receive VTE chemoprophylaxis during admission (64% vs. 68%, P = 0.04). Of patients undergoing iliocaval surgery, 64% underwent repair, 26% ligation, and 10% unknown. Iliocaval injury patients had higher rates of VTE (12% vs. 2%), 24-hr mortality (23% vs. 2.0%) and in-hospital mortality (33% vs. 3.4%) (P < 0.001 for all). VTE rates were similar following repair (14%) and ligation (17%). Iliocaval injury patients also had higher rates of cardiac complications (10.3% vs. 1.4%), acute kidney injury (8.2% vs. 1.3%), extremity compartment syndrome (4.0 vs. 0.2%), and unplanned return to OR (7.9% vs. 2.5%) (P < 0.001 for all). In multivariable analyses, iliocaval injury was independently associated with risk of VTE (OR 2.12; 95% CI, 1.29-3.48; P = 0.003), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 9.61; 95% CI, 4.96-18.64; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Iliocaval injuries occur in <5% of penetrating abdominal trauma but are associated with more severe injury patterns and high mortality rates. Regardless of repair type, survivors should be considered high risk for developing VTE.

Use of covered stent grafts as treatment of traumatic venous injury to the inferior vena cava and iliac veins: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Venous injury to the inferior vena cava or iliac veins is rare but can result in high mortality rates. Traditional treatment by repair or ligation can be technically demanding. A relatively new treatment modality is the use of a covered stent to cover the venous defect. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the techniques, results, and challenges of covered stent graft repair of traumatic injury to the inferior vena cava and iliac veins.

METHODS

The PubMed (Medline) and Embase databases were systematically searched up to September 2020 by two of us (R.R.S. and D.D.) independently for studies reporting on covered stenting of the inferior vena cava or iliac veins after traumatic or iatrogenic injury. A methodologic quality assessment was performed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data were extracted for the following parameters: first author, year of publication, study design, number of patients, type and diameter of the stent graft, hemostatic success, complications, mortality, postoperative medication, follow-up type and duration, and venous segment patency. The main outcome was clinical success of the intervention, defined as direct hemostasis, with control of hemorrhage, hemodynamic recovery, and absence of contrast extravasation.

RESULTS

From the initial search, which yielded 1884 records, a total of 28 studies were identified for analysis. All reports consisted of case reports, except for one retrospective cohort study and one case series. A total of 35 patients had been treated with various covered stent grafts, predominantly thoracic or abdominal aortic endografts. In all patients, the treatment was technically successful. The 30-day mortality rate for the entire series was 2.9%. Three perioperative complications were described: one immediate stent occlusion, one partial thrombosis, and one pulmonary embolism. Additional in-stent thrombus formation was seen during follow-up in three patients, leading to one stent graft occlusion (asymptomatic). The postoperative anticoagulation strategy was highly heterogeneous. The median follow-up was 3 months (range, 0.1-84 months). However, follow-up with imaging studies was not performed in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected cases of injury to the inferior vena cava and iliac veins, covered stent grafts can be successful for urgent hemostasis with good short-term results. Data on long-term follow-up are very limited.

Inferior vena cava injury after blunt trauma: Case report

•

Inferior vena cava injury is a rare injury with high rate mortality.

•

Few clinical cases have described the clinical findings and radiologic appearance of this kind of injury.

•

We describe a rare clinical case of inferior vena cava hematoma.

•

The management depends on the hemodynamic stability of the patient and the level of injury, it might be surgical, endoscopic.

Introduction

inferior vena cava IVC injury is rare with lethal outcomes, the clinical signs depends on the location and associated injuries, andt he treatment might be endovascular, surgical.

Clinical case

A 25 years with no medical history was admitted to the emergency department after a car accident. After intubation and hemodynamic stabilization, the computerized tomography CT scan showed hepatic laceration with a rupture of the IVC in the retro-hepatic portion, he was admitted to the operation room for damage control laparotomy; the patient died 12 h after the operation despite appropriate management.

Conclusion

IVC are rare and lethal, the CT scan remains the gold standard and the evolution of endovascular techniques decreased the mortality rate.

Intra-abdominal Inferior Vena Cava Injuries: Operative Strategies and Outcomes

Visceral vascular injuries are relatively uncommon even in busy urban trauma centers. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is the most frequently injured visceral vein and can be a complex operative challenge. Despite advances in early volume resuscitation, improved transport times, prompt operative intervention, and hemorrhage control, mortality rates have remained largely unchanged. This article conducts an in-depth review of the literature surrounding IVC injuries and a detailed discussion of operative strategies and management as survivability is ultimately dependent on the grade of injury, location, and the presence of hemorrhagic shock.

Operative Traumatic Aortic Injuries at an Urban Pediatric Hospital

PURPOSE

Limited data are available describing the long-term results of pediatric patients undergoing aortic repair secondary to trauma. Therefore, this descriptive investigation was completed to abrogate this deficit.

METHODS

A retrospective review of an urban level 1 pediatric trauma database maintained at a high-volume dedicated children's hospital between 2008-2018 was completed to capture all cases of severe traumatic aortic injury and associated demographics, mechanisms, injury severity, treatment, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In the prespecified interval, 2189 children (age <18 years) presented to our facility as a level 1 trauma activation. Of these cases, a total of 10 patients (.5%) had a demonstrable thoracic or abdominal aortic injury. The mean age of our study cohort was 10.4 ± 5.7 years. The mechanism of injury consisted of 8 participants involved in motor vehicle accidents, 1 pedestrian struck by a vehicle, and 1 struck by a falling boulder. Injuries were identified via CT angiogram (n = 9) or autopsy (n = 1) and consisted of 6 thoracic aortas and 4 abdominal aortas. The mean trauma injury severity score was 37.6 ± 19.9. Seven of the patients underwent open surgical intervention, 1 underwent endovascular intervention, 1 was treated with medical management, and 1 patient expired in the trauma bay before surgery could be performed. Aortic pathologies observed were 6 transections, 2 dissections, and 2 occlusions. Five of the ten patients underwent nonaortic surgical procedures. To determine operative outcomes, we excluded the 2 patients who did not receive aortic intervention. In the 8 remaining patients, the mean hospital length of stay was 12.8 ± 4.8 days with 6.8 ± 4.1 days in the intensive care unit. All 9 participants who survived the initial trauma evaluation were discharged from the hospital. Mean follow-up was 38.3 ± 43.0 months; during which, we observed no additional aortic-related morbidity, mortality, and reinterventions. The only stent-graft deployed remained in stable position without evidence of endoleak or migration by duplex.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic aortic injury is exceedingly rare in children and primarily of blunt etiology. Of the patients who survive the scene, operative repair seems to be associated with excellent perioperative and long-term survival.

Penetrating injuries of the inferior vena cava

Inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries occur in 0.5-5% of cases of penetrating abdominal injury. Uncommonly encountered in general surgical and trauma practice, they remain extremely lethal despite advances in resuscitation and critical care. Important factors determining treatment outcomes are the hemodynamic status of the patient at presentation, the level and extent of injury, and the presence of associated injuries. Operative approaches and techniques for definitive repair are to be tailored to the condition of the patient, type of injury, and available expertise. In a patient with severe hemodynamic compromise, damage control principles take priority to stop bleeding and save life. The most commonly employed strategies are venorrhaphy or ligation. Retro-hepatic and supra-hepatic caval injuries are particularly challenging in terms of exposure and repair, and are associated with high fatality. Endovascular approaches are being used in select cases with success. This paper reviews in detail the epidemiology, injury patterns, management protocols, and outcomes of IVC injuries due to penetrating abdominal trauma.

Blunt Aortic / Inferior Vena Cava Injury: Are We Consistently Providing the Same Level of Care?

Major vascular traumatic injuries have a higher pre-hospital and in-hospital mortality rate. The different mechanisms of injury and anatomy of the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) make the management a constant challenge to surgeons and clinicians. Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) can occur at the thoracic or abdominal level, each of which possesses different considerations. Blunt traumatic inferior vena cava injury (BTIVCI) also has important diagnostic challenges since the lesion may not be as evident in the IVC as compared to the aorta, possibly due to lower caval pressures or the ability to self-tamponade from adjacent structures. Endovascular management has significantly increased in the past years, and despite an improvement in mortality, the approach to aortic and IVC injuries is not well standardized. Diagnostic imaging helps to classify the extent of the lesions and guide towards the best therapeutic options for each case. Conservative management, in some cases, has shown to reduce mortality, and close follow-up has proven good outcomes. Future research will provide more evidence to determine the best approach to BTAI and BTIVCI for better long-term outcomes. This article aims to provide an updated review of the current literature regarding diagnosis, classification, and management of BTAI and BTIVCI.

Predictors of blunt abdominal aortic injury in trauma patients and mortality analysis

OBJECTIVE

Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) occurs in less than 0.1% of blunt traumas. A previous multi-institutional study found an associated mortality rate of 39%. We sought to identify risk factors for BAAI and risk factors for mortality in patients with BAAI using a large national database. We hypothesized that an Injury Severity Score of 25 or greater, and thoracic trauma would both increase the risk of mortality in patients with BAAI.

METHODS

The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for individuals with blunt trauma. Patients with and without BAAI were compared. Covariates were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to determine mechanisms of injury, examination findings, and concomitant injuries associated with increased risk for BAAI. An additional multivariable analysis was performed for mortality in patients with BAAI.

RESULTS

From 1,056,633 blunt trauma admissions, 1012 (0.1%) had BAAI. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (MVA; 57.5%). More than one-half the patients had at least one rib fracture (54.0%), or a spine fracture (53.9%), whereas 20.8% had hypotension on admission and 7.8% had a trunk abrasion. The average length of stay was 13.4 days and 24.6% required laparotomy, with 6.6% receiving an endovascular repair and 2.9% an open repair. The risk of death in those treated with endovascular vs open repair was similar (P = .28). On multivariable analysis, MVA was the mechanism associated with the highest risk of BAAI (odds ratio [OR], 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.87-5.65; P < .001) followed by pedestrian struck (OR, 4.54; 95% CI, 3.47-5.92; P < .001). Other factors associated with BAAI included hypotension on admission (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 3.21-4.66; P < .001), hemopneumothorax (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.16-11.58; P < .001), abrasion to the trunk (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.94; P = .003), and rib fracture (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.70; P < .001). The overall mortality rate was 28.0%. Of the variables examined, the strongest risk factor associated with mortality in patients with BAAI was hemopneumothorax (OR, 12.49; 95% CI, 1.25-124.84; P = .03) followed by inferior vena cava (IVC) injury (OR, 12.05; 95% CI, 2.80-51.80; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest nationwide series to date, BAAI continues to have a high mortality rate with hemopneumothorax and IVC injury associated with the highest risk for mortality. The mechanism most strongly associated with BAAI is MVA followed by pedestrian struck. Other risk factors for BAAI include rib fracture and trunk abrasion. Providers must maintain a high suspicion of injury for BAAI when these mechanisms of injury, physical examination or imaging findings are encountered.