Current challenges in open versus endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm

Physician Modified Endograft for Ruptured Dissecting Aortic Arch Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) in elective settings has demonstrated successful clinical outcomes. However, life-threatening conditions such as rupture are more often managed with open surgical repair due to the high complexity of arch endovascular repair, lack of available off-the-shelf devices, and limited long-term data.

CASE SUMMARY

A 49-year-old female with a recent history of prior ascending aortic repair for Type A10 aortic dissection presented with chest pain and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed acute bilateral pulmonary emboli and a 6.2 cm post dissection aneurysm of the posterior aortic arch with the dissection extending to the right iliac artery. She was treated with thrombolysis and subsequently became hemodynamically unstable. Repeat CTA revealed a massive left hemithorax with concern for aortic arch rupture. Given significant cardiorespiratory compromise and recent open repair, she was considered unfit for redo open repair. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a physician-modified endograft (PMEG) was planned. An Alpha Zenith endograft was modified adding an internal branch for the innominate artery and a fenestration for the left common carotid artery. The left subclavian artery was occluded with a microvascular plug and coil embolization up to the level of the vertebral artery. TEVAR PMEG extension to the celiac artery was performed followed by deployment of a Zenith dissection stent to the aortic bifurcation. Completion angiogram demonstrated successful aneurysm exclusion and patency of target vessels.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment of ruptured TAA with PMEGs is feasible. This approach may be an alternative for unfit patients for open repair in emergent settings.

Biodegradable Plant Oil-Based Bioadhesive with Ultrastrong Wet-Tissue Adhesion for Instant Sealing Hemostasis

The key to saving lives is to achieve instant and effective sealing hemostasis in the event of emergency bleeding. Herein, a plant oil-based EMTA/Zn2+ bioadhesive is prepared by a facile reaction of epoxidized soybean oil (ESO) with methacrylic acid (MAA) and tannic acid (TA), followed by the addition of zinc ions for coordination with TA. The EMTA/Zn2+ bioadhesive can be rapidly cured in situ at the wound site through photo-cross-linking under ultraviolet (UV) light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation within 30 s, achieving ultrastrong wet-tissue adhesion performance of 92.4 and 51.8 kPa to porcine skin and aortic skin after 7 days underwater, respectively. Especially, the EMTA/Zn2+ bioadhesive exhibits outstanding sealing performance in vitro with the high burst pressure of 525 mmHg (70 kPa) and 337.5 mmHg (45 kPa) to porcine skin and aortic skin, respectively. Moreover, the EMTA/Zn2+ bioadhesive not only has outstanding hemocompatibility and good biodegradability but also exhibits excellent cytocompatibility and antibacterial properties. Notably, the EMTA/Zn2+ bioadhesive has remarkable instant sealing hemostatic ability for hemorrhaging liver in vivo. Therefore, the prepared plant oil-based EMTA/Zn2+ bioadhesive can serve as a charming alternative candidate for instant sealing hemostasis in clinical applications, especially in traumatic internal organs and arterial bleeding.

CXCR2 (rs3890158 and rs2230054) and CXCL4 (rs352008 and rs1801572) gene polymorphisms in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm

We aimed to explore the correlations of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4 (CXCL4) gene polymorphisms with thoracic aortic aneurysm. A total of 50 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (disease group) and 50 healthy people in the physical examination center (control group) in our hospital were selected as the subjects. The CXCR2 and CXCL4 gene polymorphisms were detected by means of blood drawing, DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing. Moreover, the levels of serum CXCR2 and CXCL4 were measured using ELISA, and the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were determined. The study found significant differences in the distribution of genotypes and alleles of CXCR2 and CXCL4 gene polymorphisms between the disease group and control group. The frequencies of certain genotypes (AA of rs3890158, CC of rs2230054, AT of rs352008, and CT of rs1801572) were higher in the disease group, as were the frequencies of certain alleles (C of rs2230054 and rs1801572). The distribution of recessive models of rs2230054 was also different, with a lower frequency of CC+CT in the disease group. The haplotype distributions of both gene polymorphisms differed between the groups. CXCR2 rs3890158 and CXCL4 rs352008 were correlated with lower serum levels of their respective proteins, while CXCL4 rs1801572 was associated with CRP levels and CXCR2 rs2230054 with LDL levels in patients (P < 0.05). The gene polymorphisms of CXCR2 and CXCL4 probably have apparent correlations with the susceptibility to thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Alternative therapeutic strategy for existing aortic aneurysms using mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes

BACKGROUND

Several studies demonstrated the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (MSC-exs) based on their anti-inflammatory properties. The objective was to determine the therapeutic effects of MSC-exs on aortic aneurysms (AAs) caused by atherosclerosis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Apolipoprotein E knockout mice with AAs induced by angiotensin II were injected with MSC-exs or saline as a control. The change in the diameter of the aorta was measured. The expression of AA-related proteins and the histology of the aortic wall were investigated at 1 week after treatment. MicroRNA and protein profiles of MSC-exs were examined.

RESULTS

MSC-exs significantly attenuated AA progression (2.04 ± 0.20 mm in the saline group and 1.34 ± 0.13 mm in the MSC-ex group, P = 0.004). In the MSC-ex group, the expression of IL-1β, TNF-α and MCP-1 decreased, and expression of IGF-1 and TIMP-2 increased. MSC-ex induced the M2 phenotype in macrophages and suppressed the destruction of the elastic lamellae in the aortic wall. MSC-exs contained high levels of 10 microRNAs that inhibit AA formation and 13 proteins that inhibit inflammation and promote extracellular matrix synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

MSC-ex might be a novel alternative therapeutic tool for treatment of existing AAs.

WITHDRAWN: Circ-LAMP2 regulates aortic smooth muscle cell proliferation and apoptosis in thoracic aortic aneurysm via modulation of autophagy and NF-κB pathway

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

NEAT1 boosts the development of thoracic 1 aortic aneurysm through targeting miR-324-5p/RAN

BACKGROUND

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified in multiple cancers. Recently, NEAT1 is found to be up regulated in cervical cancer. Since the relationship between NEAT1 and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) has not been clarified, our study focused on the role of NEAT1 in TAA.

METHODS

Bioinformatics, RNA pulls down and luciferase reporter assay were used to discover and determine miR-324-5p to be a target of NEAT1. RT-qPCR was used to examine NEAT1, RAN and miR-324-5p expression.

RESULTS

NEAT1 was up-regulated in TAA patients, as well as HAoSMC and HA-VSMC cells. Down-regulation of NEAT1 could inhibit the proliferative abilities while promoting apoptosis of TAA cells. MiR-324-5p expression was down-regulated in both TAA tissues and cells. Then, RAN was selected out as a target of miR-324-5p. More interestingly, miR-324-5p had inhibitory effects on malignant behaviors of TAA cells. RAN was negatively related with miR-324-5p while positively correlated with NEAT1 in the tissues. Finally, the data of rescue assays manifested that RAN up-regulation could countervail the influence of down-regulation of NEAT1 on TAA cells.

CONCLUSION

NEAT1 could contribute to the malignant behaviors of TAA cells by targeting miR-324-5p/RAN. NEAT1 might be an underlying target for the therapy of TAA.

Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair for Ruptured Descending Aortic Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

PURPOSE

Ruptured descending thoracic aorta (rDTA) is an harmful condition requiring emergent treatment. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is replacing the traditional open repair in the majority of descending thoracic aortic disease. An unanimous agreement regarding the optimal approach to treat rDTA has not been reached yet due to the lack of evidences supporting the improvement of long-term survival. The present meta-analysis of observational cohort studies aims to estimate the outcome of endovascular (TEVAR) versus surgical (OR) approach in the treatment of rDTA.

METHODS

Prisma Statement for performing and reporting meta-analysis has been used. MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. A meta-analysis of observational cohort studies that examined the outcomes after OR and TEVAR for the management of rDTA was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 10,466 patients with rDTA were screened. Endovascular therapy was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality compared with open repair (Risk Ratio[RR] 0.63; 95% CI0.57-0.70). The risk of stroke rate was not statistically different between endovascular versus open approach (RR0.86; 95% CI0.62-1.19). Endovascular treatment had benefits on paraplegia (RR0.70; 95% CI0.55-0.91) and other neurological complications (RR0.24; 95% CI0.10-0.56). TEVAR was associated with lower renal failure, cardiac complications and vascular injuries. Late mortality (Hazard Ratio[HR] 0.84; 95% CI0.63-1.13) and re-intervention rate (RR1.48; 95% CI0.80-2.74) were not significantly different between TEVAR and OR.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR seems to offer advantages in terms of early mortality and complications rate. Moreover, data on late mortality and re-intervention are encouraging to consider endovascular treatment comparable to open repair for acute thoracic aorta emergency on long-term follow-up.

A multicenter study of emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: Indications and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular techniques have become an essential tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR]). The aim is to analyze the indications and outcomes of emergency TEVAR at national level in relation to elective surgery.

STUDY DESIGN AND SCOPE

A retrospective multicenter registry of patients with descending thoracic aortic disease treated on an emergency basis using endovascular techniques between 2012-2016, in 11 clinical units.

PATIENTS, INCLUSION CRITERIA

1) Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (RTAA); 2) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TAI); and 3) Complicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADc).

PRIMARY VARIABLES

Patient mortality, survival and reoperation rate.

SECONDARY VARIABLES

Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, specific data by indication, technical resources and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 135 urgent TEVARs were included (111 men, mean age 60.4 ± 16.3 years): 43 ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (31.9%), 54 type B dissections (40%) and 32 traumatic aortic injuries (23.7%), and other etiologies 4.4%. The overall mortality rate at 30 days was 18.5%, and proved higher in the RTAA group (27.9%). The mean actuarial survival rate was 67 ± 6% at 5 years. The postoperative stroke rate was 5.2%, and the paraplegia rate was 5.9%. Aortic reoperations proved necessary in 12 patients (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency descending thoracic aortic diseases can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality - though the figures are slightly higher than in elective cases. This registry provides, for the first time, real information on the daily clinical practice of emergency TEVAR in Spain.

Challenges and experience of setting up an aortic service

Aortic surgery is a complex procedure posing high risks in comparison to other adult cardiac surgeries. Novel surgical approaches including minimally invasive procedures, sutureless aortic valve replacement, and transcatheter aortic valve implantation have been found to be acceptable alternatives to conventional surgeries. In addition, novel endovascular repair techniques and hybrid procedures have been introduced for the management of patients with thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies. However, these modalities are not readily available in every center, and such novel procedures impose a learning curve for surgeons and high costs for affected patients. In this review, we discuss the challenges of setting up an aortic service, having regard to the Iranian experience.

Design of non-equal-strut stent hoops for structural optimization of thoracic aortic stent-grafts

Background: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with stent-grafts is used widely for the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA). Inappropriate design of stent-grafts may lead to complications such as endoleak, stent-graft migration and new entries, causes of which may be inappropriate radial support force or insufficient longitudinal flexibility of the stent-grafts.Material and methods: To improve the mechanical performance of the stent-grafts, a type of non-equal-strut stent hoops was proposed, and the influence of structural parameters on the mechanical performance was studied.Results: Results of numerical simulation and physical experiments show that by using the proposed non-equal-strut stent hoops, radial support force and longitudinal flexibility of stent-grafts can be reconciled and balanced.Conclusion: Results of this study could be used to facilitate radial force control and longitudinal flexibility enhancement in the design of aortic stent-grafts.

The future of stenting in patients with type A aortic dissection: a systematic review

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) carries high morbidity and mortality rates and is a clinical emergency. The reported mortality rate is 50% to 65% within the first 48 hours without surgical intervention. Open surgery therefore remains the gold standard management for ATAAD. However, in patients who are deemed unfit for surgery and where possible, endovascular repair offers a useful alternative to medical treatment alone or high-risk open surgical repair. Several case reports, case series, and retrospective studies have reported good outcomes following endovascular treatment. The endovascular option also has comparable early and late outcomes, favourable aortic remodelling, and satisfactory overall survival despite having a higher-risk patient cohort. However, stenting in patients with ATAAD undoubtedly still has several limitations and technical challenges.

A multicenter study of emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: indications and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular techniques have become an essential tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR]). The aim is to analyze the indications and outcomes of emergency TEVAR at national level in relation to elective surgery.

STUDY DESIGN AND SCOPE

A retrospective multicenter registry of patients with descending thoracic aortic disease treated on an emergency basis using endovascular techniques between 2012-2016, in 11 clinical units.

PATIENTS, INCLUSION CRITERIA

1) Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms; 2) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury; and 3) Complicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADc).

PRIMARY VARIABLES

Patient mortality, survival and reoperation rate.

SECONDARY VARIABLES

Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, specific data by indication, technical resources and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 135 urgent TEVARs were included (111 men, mean age 60.4 ± 16.3 years): 43 ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (31.9%), 54 type B dissections (40%) and 32 traumatic aortic injuries (23.7%), and other etiologies 4.4%. The overall mortality rate at 30 days was 18.5%, and proved higher in the ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms group (27.9%). The mean actuarial survival rate was 67± 6% at 5 years. The postoperative stroke rate was 5.2%, and the paraplegia rate was 5.9%. Aortic reoperations proved necessary in 12 patients (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency descending thoracic aortic diseases can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality - though the figures are slightly higher than in elective cases. This registry provides, for the first time, real information on the daily clinical practice of emergency TEVAR in Spain.

Improved midterm outcomes after endovascular repair of nontraumatic descending thoracic aortic rupture compared with open surgery

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become first-line treatment for descending thoracic aortic rupture (DTAR), but its midterm and long-term outcomes remain undescribed. This study evaluated whether TEVAR would improve midterm outcomes of nontraumatic DTAR relative to open surgical repair (OSR).

METHODS

Between December 1999 and October 2018, 118 patients with DTAR were treated with either OSR (n = 39) or TEVAR (n = 79) at a single center. Primary end points were 30-day and long-term all-cause mortalities. Secondary end points included stroke, permanent spinal cord ischemia (SCI), prolonged ventilation support or tracheostomy, permanent hemodialysis, and aortic reintervention.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower with TEVAR (OSR, 38.5%; TEVAR, 16.5%; P = .01). Stroke (15.6% vs 3.8%; P = .03), permanent SCI (15.6% vs 2.5%; P = .02), prolonged ventilation (30.8% vs 8.9%; P = .002), and tracheostomy (12.8% vs 2.5%; P = .04) were significantly lower after TEVAR than OSR. Need for hemodialysis trended higher after OSR (12.8% vs 5.1%; P = .2). Mean follow ups were 1048 ± 1591 days for OSR group and 828 ± 1258 days for TEVAR. All-cause mortality at last follow-up was significantly lower after TEVAR than OSR (35.4% vs 66.7%; P = .001). Aortic reintervention was required more frequently within 30 days after TEVAR (15.2% vs 2.6%; P = .06). By multivariate analysis, TAAA was an independent predictor for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR improves both early and midterm outcomes of DTAR relative to OSR. TAAA was a predictor of mortality. Endovascular approach to DTAR may provide the greatest chance at survival.

Aortic endovascular stenting in patients with systemic connective tissue disorders: does the prohibitive dogma still stand tall?

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic diseases can provide satisfactory outcomes in elective and certain emergency cases involving the descending thoracic and aortic arch. However, open repair remains the gold standard method of aortic root pathologies and certain aortic arch pathologies, such as extended dissection. Nevertheless, the use of endovascular stenting in patients with connective tissue disorders has not been fully explored because the aortic tissues are fragile and the likelihood of keeping the stent in place is low because of its progressive dilatation and subsequent requirement for open repair at a later stage when the stent graft fails. Our brief review focuses on current evidence of the use of stents in patients with connective tissue disorders and whether such practice can be expanded further.

The top 100 manuscripts in emergency cardiac surgery. Potential role in cardiothoracic training. A bibliometric analysis

Background

Emergency Cardiac Surgery (ECS) is a component of cardiothoracic training. Citations are considered to represent a papers influence. Bibliometric analyses allow us to identify the most influential work, and future research. We aim to highlight the key research themes within ECS and determine their potential impact on cardiothoracic training.

Methods

Thomas Reuters Web of Science was searched using terms [Emergency AND Card* AND Surg*]. Results were ranked by citation and reviewed by a panel of cardiac surgeons to identify the top 100 cited papers relevant to ECS. Papers were analysed by topic, journal and impact. Regression analysis was used to determine a link between impact factor and scientific impact.

Results

3823 papers were identified. Median citations for the top 100 was 88. The paper with the highest impact was by Nashef et al. focusing on the use of EuroSCORE (2043 citations). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery published most papers (n = 18:1778 citations). The European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery coveted the most citations (n = 2649). The USA published most papers (n = 55).The most ubiquitous topics were; risk stratification, circulatory support and aortic surgery. A positive relationship between journal impact fact and the scientific impact of manuscripts in ECS (P = 0.043) was deduced.

Conclusion

This study is the first of its kind and identified the papers which are likely to the contribute most to training and understanding of ECS. A papers influence is partially determined by journal impact factor. Bibliometric analysis is a potent tool to identify surgical training needs.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of acute type B thoracic aortic dissection, open, or endovascular repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and mortality outcomes of endovascular aortic repair against open repair in acute type B thoracic aortic dissection.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all published data comparing open vs endovascular repair in management of acute type B aortic dissection. Databases where evaluated and assessed to July 2017. The 95% confidence intervals were analyzed from the extracted data using relevant statistical methods.

RESULTS

Overall, 18,193 patients were found in a combination of nine studies. Patients undergoing open repair were younger (mean, 61.3 ± 9.3 years vs 66.6 ± 12.5 years; P < .00001). Postoperative stroke and paraplegia were similar in both groups (P = .71 and P = .81 respectively); however, the rate of all neurologic complications were more common in the traditional open repair group (6.9% vs 4.8%; P = .006). The all-cause operative and 1-year death was reported as higher in the open repair group (18.6% vs 7.4% [P < .0001] and 24.3% vs 14.3% [P < .0001], respectively); however, at 5 years this rate is almost similar between both groups (46.7% vs 49.7%; P = .21). At 1 year, the rate of reintervention was reported to be higher in endovascular repair group of patients (15.4% vs 5.5%; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that endovascular repair, in the setting of acute type B thoracic aortic dissection, provides an early surgical benefit; however, this finding has not yet been supported by long-term data. There seems to be a benefit with respect to all-neurologic events in favor of endovascular repair. Long-term comparative data and studies are required to give a better understanding of these two approaches.

Innominate artery cannulation in aortic surgery: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The innominate artery is considered an alternative site for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass in surgical procedures involving the thoracic aorta. This systematic review examines the use of innominate artery cannulation in aortic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all studies that utilized innominate artery cannulation for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass and providing cerebral perfusion in thoracic aortic surgery. The data were reviewed up to September 2018.

RESULTS

Acute type A aortic dissection contributed to 36% (n = 818) of the total 2,290 patients. 31.5% (n = 719) underwent surgery on the aortic root only; 54.5% (n = 1246) had ascending and hemi-arch replacement, while 11.5% had total aortic arch replacement and 2.5% had a frozen elephant trunk inserted. Postoperative stroke rate was 1.25% (n = 28), temporary neurological deficit was 4.8% (n = 111). All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 2.7% (n = 61).

CONCLUSION

Innominate artery cannulation is a safe technique in patients who undergo thoracic aortic surgery. It can be utilized, in selected cases, as a reliable route for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass and maintaining cerebral perfusion.