Open repair versus endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac lesions in low risk patients

Analysis of Midterm Readmissions and Related Costs after Open and Endovascular Procedures for Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease

Background. Readmissions rates and costs were analysed over follow-up for patients who underwent open or endovascular procedures for aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Methods. Patients who underwent aorto-bifemoral bypass (ABF) or covered kissing stent (CKS) for AIOD from May 2008 to February 2018 were compared in terms of readmission rates, related costs expressed in EUR, freedom from generic readmission (FFGR), and freedom from readmission for surgical reasons (FFRS). Results. ABF had a readmission rate of 16% and CKS of 18% (p = 0.999). The most common cause of readmission was prosthesis limb or stent occlusion. Time to readmission was longer for ABF (35 months [21-82] vs. 13.5 months [1-68.7] in the CKS group, p = 0.334). CKS group had higher cumulative re-hospitalisation, ICU stay, and reintervention costs (11569 ± 2216 SEM, 2405 ± 1125, 5264 ± 1230, respectively) and a trend for more readmissions in the first 36 months, without reaching significance. Conclusion. This study reports on a period of time exceeding ninety days. Even if not reaching significance, the CKS group presented a higher trend in readmissions till 36 months and a higher trend in readmission costs, while time-to-readmission was longer in the ABF group.

Covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation: A systematic review aggregated data and individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the early and midterm efficacy and safety of covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) in the treatment of aortoiliac disease (AID).

METHODS

A systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published by August 2023 was performed. The primary end points were primary patency and secondary patency.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective case series, involving 579 patients, were incorporated in the review with 88.9% of the included lesions being categorized as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C or D. The pooled primary patency estimates at 12, 24 and 36 months were 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.4-99.7), 84.4% (95% CI, 72.3-98.5) and 83.8% (95% CI, 71.4-98.3) respectively. The mean primary patency time, representing the period during which individuals remained event-free, was 51.9 months (95% CI, 43.6-55.4). The pooled 36 months primary patency for studies with a predominantly claudicant patient population (>75% of patients) was 89.4% (95% CI, 78.5-100.0), compared with 71.5% (95% CI, 45.6-100.0) for studies with a mixed population (50% of patients). The pooled 36 months primary patency for studies with a predominantly TASC D patient population (>82% of patients) was 70.4% (95% CI, 46.4-100.0) compared with 91.0% (95% CI, 79.1-100.0) for studies with a more homogenous cohort. The pooled secondary patency estimates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 98.6% (95% CI, 96.2-100.0), 97% (95% CI, 93.1-100.0), and 97% (95% CI, 93.1-100.0), respectively. The pooled technical success, 30-day mortality and 30-day systemic complications estimates were 95.9% (95% CI, 93.7- 97.4), 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0-3.5), and 6.4% (95% CI, 4.4-9.1), respectively. The pooled intraoperative and postoperative 30-day CERAB-related complications estimates were 7.3% (95% CI, 2.0-23.0) and 4.2% (95% CI, 0.7-21.0), respectively. The pooled major amputation and target lesion reinterventions by the end of follow-up were 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0-3.4) and 13.9% (95% CI, 9.9-19.2), respectively. The pooled access site complication estimate was 11.7% (95% CI, 5.9-21.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this review has showcased the safety and feasibility of the CERAB technique in treating AID, it has also highlighted the necessity for a close and prolonged follow-up period extending beyond 1 year. Moreover, the favorable secondary patency estimates predominantly attained via endovascular reinterventions emphasize a potentially advantageous characteristic of the CERAB technique, particularly valuable when addressing late-stage AID disease or anatomically complex lesions.

Mid-term Results of Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation Using COVERA Stent Graft

INTRODUCTION

This article aims to evaluate the short-term and mid-term performance of a self-expanding covered stent (COVERA Plus, Bard Tempe, Arizona) during the treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C/D aortoiliac obstructive lesions involving the aortic bifurcation.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent endovascular reconstruction of the aortoiliac bifurcation for obstructive disease, with the use of Covera, from January 2018 to March 2023. All patients received a postoperative CTA (computed tomography angiography) scan within 1 month from the intervention. Precision of deployment, stent conformation, and stent symmetry were evaluated at the arterial phase of the CTA. Early outcomes were technical success and freedom from open aortic reintervention and/or mortality. Late outcomes were primary and assisted primary patency rates and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

During the study period, 35 patients underwent primary endovascular treatment of obstructive lesions involving the aortic bifurcation with parallel COVERA stents. Aortoiliac lesions were classified as TASC-IIC in 23 (65.7%) patients and TASC D in 12 (34.2%). Median follow-up was 49 months (interquartile [IQR]: 18-60). Overall survival was 97.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]=91-100) at 60 months. During follow-up, there were one early stent stenosis, treated with an angioplasty and stent relining with an estimated primary patency at 60 months of 97.1% (95% CI=94-100) and a primary-assisted patency of 100%. Estimated freedom from all types of reinterventions at 60 months was 94.3% (95% CI=89-99.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The new self-expanding covered Bard COVERA Plus stent used for endovascular treatment of TASC C/D aorto iliac disease proved to be safe and feasible with high technical procedural success rates. Comparison with other types of stents is necessary to further assess the role of the COVERA Plus stent in aortic bifurcation repair.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study investigates the safety and feasibility of the new self-expanding covered Bard Covera Plus stent used for endovascular treatment of TASC C/D aorto iliac disease. The retrospective analysis of 35 patients highlights high technical success and primary patency rate at 60 months. The geometric analysis also helped to underline how this stent can be used precisely in particular conditions. These findings suggest the need for further research to compare COVERA with other types of stents in aortic bifurcation repair.

Influence of Perioperative Factors on Patency After Endovascular and Hybrid Treatments of TASC II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Lesions

BACKGROUND

Treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II D aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD D) remains a controversial topic. Although current recommendations support conventional surgical treatment, several recent studies have reported promising results with endovascular and hybrid strategies. The purpose of this work was to describe the outcomes of endovascular and hybrid management of AIOD D and to investigate the influence of perioperative factors on patency.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study covering the period from 2016 to 2021. The primary end point was primary patency at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success rate, 30-day mortality, early major complication rate, primary assisted and secondary patency at 12 months, and primary patency at 24 months. After descriptive statistical analysis, a survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Eighteen perioperative factors potentially associated with primary patency were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis adjusted by a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

In all, 82 patients (112 limbs) had undergone an attempt at endovascular (n = 55, 67%) or hybrid (n = 27, 33%) treatment for AIOD D over the study period. The technical success rate was 99%. The 30-day mortality rate was 3%. The early major complication rate was 11%. The primary patency rates at 12 and 24 months were 87.9% [80.3; 96.3] and 77% [66.3; 89.3], respectively. The primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 12 months were 92.6% [86.3; 99.2] and 96% [91.4; 100]. Among the perioperative factors studied, the heavily calcified nature of the target lesions was the only variable significantly associated with primary patency loss in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Although the results of endovascular and hybrid treatment of AOID D are acceptable, future studies should focus on improving patency rates in heavily calcified lesions. Specific tools of endovascular preparation (intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy) may represent interesting ways of research.

Open Versus Endovascular Repair With Covered Stents for Complex Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: Cost Analysis Results

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is to value cost-effectiveness of complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) revascularization, by comparing in-hospital clinical outcomes and detailed costs of hospitalization of open and endovascular techniques.

METHODS

This observational single-center retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent AIOD revascularization from May 2008 to February 2018 and met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into 2 groups: open surgical repair and endovascular repair. Inclusion criteria were type C and D AIOD, and type of intervention: aorto-bifemoral bypass and covered kissing stenting. Costs were directly compared between the 2 groups, and subsequently a multivariate logistic regression model was performed to define which group most influenced major in-hospital costs. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of long-term mortality and primary patency (PP).

RESULTS

The 2 groups included 50 patients each, and all patients had a bilateral iliac axis revascularization. Mean age was 67 ± 9 years and 71% of patients were males. The open surgical repair group had a significantly longer length of hospitalization (P < 0.001) and in-hospital medical complications rate (22%, P = 0.003). No differences were found in the total cumulative cost of hospitalization, including ward, intensive care unit, and operating room. In a multivariate logistic model, higher total hospitalization costs were not significantly associated with either one or the other type of treatment. We did not find any statistically significant differences in overall medium-term survival (P = 0.298) and PP (P = 0.188), which were not influenced by the type of revascularization on Cox proportional hazard models (overall survival: hazard ratio 2.09 confidence interval 95% [0.90-4.84] P = 0.082; PP: hazard ratio 1.82 confidence interval 95% [0.56-6.16] P = 0.302).

CONCLUSIONS

Total in-hospital stay cost analysis did not reveal significant differences between aorto-bifemoral bypasses and covered kissing stentings for AIOD revascularization.

Aortoiliac: Covered, Uncovered, CERAB as It Relates to Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 200 million worldwide and is the leading cause of major limb amputation, with individuals suffering from PAD being at three times greater risk of dying compared with matched controls. TASC-II guidelines provide a consensus on the management of PAD based on the collaboration between international vascular specialties. These guidelines previously outlined open surgery as the gold standard for treatment of aortoiliac disease and PAD as it has demonstrated consistent long-term results. However, this approach is also associated with high perioperative mortality, especially when compared with endovascular techniques. With recent developments in endovascular technology, user technique, and experience, this approach has become more widely used as primary intervention for aortoiliac disease. One of these novel techniques includes covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation, which has demonstrated excellent technical success and improved primary and secondary patency rates with follow-up. The aim of this review is to compare the efficacy of these approaches to the treatment of aortoiliac disease and demonstrate the benefits of the shift toward an endovascular-first approach to treatment of this disease, regardless of lesion complexity or severity.

Intravascular lithotripsy angioplasty for treatment of atherosclerotic coral-reef occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and its bifurcation

In the present report, we have described the use of intravascular lithotripsy angioplasty for heavily calcified occlusions of the infrarenal aorta and its bifurcation in two patients. In the first patient, two lithotripsy balloons in kissing conformation were simultaneously used to allow for dilatation of the distal aorta and its bifurcation with preservation of accessory renal artery patency, followed by stenting of the iliac arteries. For the second patient, the infrarenal aorta occlusion was first treated with a single lithotripsy balloon, followed by covered stenting. Intravascular lithotripsy could represent a valid endovascular adjunct to optimize outcomes in the treatment of coral reef aortas and aortic bifurcation occlusion.

Outcomes of Self-Expanding Covered Stents for the Treatment of External ILIAC Artery Obstructive Disease

PURPOSE

To describe the early results and mid-term patency rates of external iliac artery (EIA) stenting using self-expanding covered stents.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study (2015-2021), including patients receiving primary endovascular treatment of external iliac artery occlusive disease with self-expanding covered stents. All patients were treated with the Viabahn (W.L Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ-USA) stent. Patency and limb salvage rates were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (mean age, 69 ± 9 years; 81% males) were treated for disabling claudication in 44%, rest pain in 28%, and tissue loss in 28%. TASC C/D lesions were present in 72% and iliac complete occlusion in 30%. Mean lesion length was 6.9 ± 2.4 cm; 30% had moderate/severe EIA calcifications; and the mean iliac tortuosity index was 1.17 ± 0.13. Technical success was 100%. There was one perioperative death (1.4%) and procedural complication rate was 6.5%. At 42 months (mean, 25 months), primary patency was 89.8% (95%CI 83-98); the presence of EIA tortuosity (tortuosity index > 1.25, 87.7 ± 11% vs 89.9 ± 8%; P = .6) or severe calcifications (87.6 ± 9% vs 96.0 ± 8%; P = .400) had no significant impact. After univariate analysis, the use of a stent with diameter < 8 mm (HR 8.5, 95%CI 3.24-14.22; P < .001) was negatively associated with primary patency.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of self-expanding covered stents provided excellent early and mid-term results in the treatment of obstructive disease of the EIA, also in cases of high EIA tortuosity and high grade of calcifications. The use of a < 8 mm-diameter stent was associated with a reduced primary patency.

Comparison of BARD®LIFESTREAM™ covered balloon-expandable stent versus GORE® VIABAHN™ covered self-expandable stent in treatment of aortoiliac obstructive disease: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial (NEONATAL trial)

BACKGROUND

Covered stent has become one of the mainstream therapies for aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD), with a higher patency rate than bare metal stent. Covered balloon-expandable (CBE) stent can be placed more accurately with higher a radial support force, while covered self-expanding (CSE) stent has greater elasticity and higher trackability. However, there is no level I evidence regarding the comparison safety and efficacy between the CSE stent and CBE stent in AIOD to date. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of CBE stent (BARD®LIFESTREAM™) and CSE stent (GORE® VIABAHN™) in AIOD.

METHODS

This trial is a prospective, single-center, parallel, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. A total of 106 patients will be enrolled and these patients will be randomized to either the CBE stent group or the CSE stent group. The primary end point of the study is the occurrence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months after the intervention.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, the ballooN sElf cOver steNt AorToiliAc occuLusive (NEONATAL) trial is the first RCT to compare CBE and CSE stent in AIOD patients. The main aim is to compare the TLR of the target lesion between CBE stent and CSE stent at 12 months post-procedure. The results of clinical trials may contribute to establishing a strategic guideline for choosing the optimal type of covered stent in the treatment of AIOD patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2100046734. Registered on 27 May 2021.

Principal predictors of major adverse limb events in diabetic peripheral artery disease: A narrative review

Background and aims

The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus is causing a massive growth of peripheral artery disease incidences, a disabling complication of diabetic atherosclerosis, which leads often to the amputation of the affected limb. Critical limb ischemia is the terminal disease stage, which requires a prompt intervention to relieve pain and save limbs. However, patients undergoing revascularization often suffer from cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and major adverse limb events with poor outcomes. Furthermore, the same procedure performed in apparently similar patients has various outcomes and lack of an outcome predictive support causes a high lower limb arterial revascularization rate with disastrous effects for patients. We collected the main risk factors of major adverse limb events in a more readable and immediate format of the topic, to propose an overview of parameters to manage effectively peripheral artery disease patients and to propose basics of a new predictive tool to prevent from disabling vascular complications of the disease.

Methods

Most recent and updated literature about the prevalence of major adverse limb events in peripheral artery disease was reviewed to identify possible main predictors.

Results

In this article, we summarized major risk factors of limb revascularization failure and disabling vascular complications collecting those parameters principally responsible for major adverse limb events, which provides physio-pathological explanation of their role in peripheral artery disease.

Conclusion

We evaluated and listed a panel of possible predictors of MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event) in order to contribute to the development of a predictive score, based on a summary of the main risk factors reported in scientific articles, which could improve the management of peripheral artery disease by preventing vascular accidents.

Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Aortic Repair in Young and Low Surgical Risk Patients in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment

PURPOSE

To investigate early- and long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in young and low surgical risk patients.

METHODS

The global registry for endovascular aortic treatment (GREAT) was queried for all patients with AAA undergoing standard EVAR; patients were excluded if had previous AAA repair or underwent concomitant procedures. Young patients were defined if age <60; surgical risk was assessed through the validated Medicare perioperative risk score (MPRS) based on age, sex, renal function, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. Patients were classified as low (MPRS<3), average (MPRS 3-11), or high (MPRS>11) risk. Young versus older patients and low-risk versus average/high-risk patients were compared. The primary endpoints were early (30 days) major adverse events (MAEs), 5-year freedom from overall mortality, aortic-related mortality, and freedom from device-related reinterventions. Time-to-event endpoints were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Of 3217 included patients, 182 (6%) were <60 years old, 956 (30%) had a low surgical risk, 1561 (49%) an average risk, 700 (22%) a high risk. Young patients had a less angulated proximal neck (27.2±18.4° vs 30.9±21.5°; p=0.05); in low-risk compared to average/high-risk patients, a longer neck length (3±1.8 vs 2.8±1.4 cm; p=0.01) and lower neck angulation (29.7±21.8° vs 33.2±22.2°; p=0.01) were present. Young age alone had no significant impact on early mortality (0% vs 0.6%; p=0.62.) and MAEs (3.9% vs 6.1%; p=0.20), while these were significantly lower in low-risk compared to average/high-risk patients (early mortality: 0.1% vs 0.7%, p=0.04; MAEs: 4.1% vs 6.7%, p=0.005). At 5 years, overall survival was significantly higher in young (88% vs 76%; p<0.001) and lower-risk (77% vs 54%; p<0.001) patients; low-risk patients also had significantly decreased aortic-related mortality (0% vs 2%; p=0.04) and reintervention rates (6% vs 11%; p=0.007). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality (0% vs 2%; p=0.42) and reintervention rate (10% vs 10%; p=1.00) between young and older patients.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world registry, EVAR was more often offered in cases with suitable anatomy in young and low-risk patients. Low operative risk, rather than young age alone, predicted excellent early outcomes and low 5-year mortality, aortic-related mortality, and reintervention rates.

Management of Extensive Aorto-Iliac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 9319 Patients

PURPOSE

Despite advances in endovascular management of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) including covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) techniques, guidelines for management of symptomatic Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) type C/D lesions favour open surgical revascularisation. This meta-analysis investigates outcomes in patients with TASC II C/D lesions treated with open bypass procedures (OS), standard endovascular treatments (SEV) or CERAB.

METHODS

Multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database) were searched to identify studies reporting endovascular and open treatment of extensive AIOD. Studies were independently assessed. Outcomes reported included 30-day morbidity/mortality and patency rates.

RESULTS

A total of 9319 patients undergoing intervention for extensive AIOD were identified from 66 studies. Median patient age was 64 years (n = 3204) for SEV, 58 years (n = 240) for CERAB and 59 years for OS (n = 5875). Pooled meta-analysis for 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing SEV, CERAB and OS was 9, 10 and 15%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rate was 0.79, 0 and 3% in the SEV, CERAB and OS groups, respectively. In these groups, one-year primary and secondary patency was 90, 88, 96 and 96, 97, and 97% whilst three-year primary and secondary patency was 78, 82, 93 and 93, 97, 97% respectively. Five-year primary and secondary patency was 71 and 89% for SEV and 88 and 95% for OS, respectively. CERAB data were only available to 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows that thirty-day morbidity and mortality favours endovascular techniques. Primary patency remains better with OS in both early and midterms;; however, secondary patency is comparable in all groups. These findings suggest that SEV/CERAB may be considered as an alternative to OS in higher-risk patients.

Endovascular Revascularization for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

말초동맥질환은 하지혈관을 흔히 침범하는 폐쇄성 질환이다. 대동맥-장골동맥 부위에서 이를 치료하기 위한 재개통술은 전통적으로 수술적인 접근을 통한 우회술을 근간으로 하였으며, 최근에는 국소적이고 단순한 병변들을 위주로 혈관 내 접근법을 통한 치료법이 우선 권고되고 있다. 혈관 내 접근법은 그 최소침습적인 특성으로 인하여 수술의 위험성이 높은 환자에 대해서 활용하는 것이 일반적이었으나, 근래의 다양한 기법 및 기구의 발전으로 보다 다양한 질병 상태를 가진 환자에서 활용되어 수술적인 치료에 근접하는 결과가 보고되고 있다. 이 종설에서는 말초동맥 질환에 대한 진단 및 대동맥-장골동맥 부위의 혈관 내 재개통술에 활용되는 기법 및 기구들에 대해 살펴보고 그 역할에 대해 살펴보고자 한다.

Covered versus bare metal kissing stents for reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation in the ILIACS registry

OBJECTIVE

We compared the early and midterm outcomes of polytetrafluoroethylene covered stents (CSs) vs bare metal stents (BMSs) used in the kissing conformation for the reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation in aortoiliac obstructive disease.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort registry (2015-2019) collected data from 1306 patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of aortoiliac arterial obstructive disease. Only patients who had received bilateral iliac kissing stents for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) class C and D lesions were included in the present analysis. The 30-day outcomes, midterm primary patency, and limb salvage rates were compared between the CSs and BMSs in matched patient cohorts after propensity score matching. The follow-up results were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the predictors of primary patency.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients were treated with kissing stents, 201 with CSs (60%) and 135 with BMSs (40%). In the unmatched cohort, patients receiving CSs were more likely to have critical limb ischemia (41% vs 30%; P = .038), complex iliac lesions, such as TASC D (90% vs 56%; P < .01), and iliac occlusions (59% vs 44%; P < .01). After propensity score matching, 220 patients were selected (110 with CSs and 110 with BMSs), without differences in the clinical presentation (critical limb ischemia, 41% vs 33%; P = .167), or anatomic complexity (TASC D, 66% vs 60%, P = .21; iliac occlusion, 48% vs 49%, P = .89). The 30-day mortality was 0%. The early medical (unmatched, 5% vs 4%, P = 1.00; matched, 5% vs 4%, P = .75) and surgical (unmatched, 5% vs 5%, P = 1.00; matched, 5% vs 3%, P = .72) complication rates were similar between the CSs and BMSs. However, the CSs resulted in a lower risk of intraoperative iliac rupture (0% vs 3.5%; P = .013) and greater ankle-brachial index improvement (0.43 ± 0.22 vs 0.36 ± 0.24; P = .02). At 36 months, the overall primary patency (92% ± 7% vs 92% ± 8%; P = .38), secondary patency (98% ± 3% vs 98% ± 4%; P = .50), and limb salvage (93% ± 9% vs 97% ± 5%; P = .20) rates were similar. In cases of moderate to severe iliac calcification, the CSs showed better results in the matched cohort (100% vs 89% ± 9%; P = .048). On multivariate analysis, CS use (hazard ratio [HR], 1.67; P = .45) did not significantly affect primary patency, but older age (HR, 0.93; P = .03) and kissing stent diameter ≥8 mm (HR, 0.25; P = .03) were significantly associated.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present multicenter study, the use of kissing stents for the treatment of the aortic bifurcation provided good early and midterm results. CSs were preferred for more complex lesions, were protective from iliac rupture, and allowed for greater ankle-brachial index improvement. The 3-year patency rates were similar between the CSs and BMSs. However, CSs showed improved results in the case of moderate to severe calcification.