Representation of women in vascular surgery science and societies

Dissecting Diversity: A Comprehensive Look at the Present Landscape and Future Challenges in Surgical Specialties

BACKGROUND

As the US demographic evolves, surgical fields must adapt to ensure equitable healthcare. Healthcare disparities notably affect minority populations, with communities of color often facing physician shortages and higher rates of diseases such as coronary disease, stroke, and cancer. Research shows that minority physicians significantly improve patient satisfaction and outcomes in underserved communities, highlighting the need for increased physician diversity to enhance cultural competency and patient centered care. Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) reveals minimal increases in underrepresented minorities (URM) in surgical residency and academic careers over the past thirty-six years, with little change URM applicants and matriculants in the nine surgical specialties recognized by the American College of Surgeons from 2010 to 2018.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to critically evaluate the current landscape of racial and gender diversity in six out of the nine defined surgical specialties (general surgery, plastic surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and vascular surgery) in the US.

DESIGN

We conducted a comprehensive literature review to assess of the state of diversity within surgical specialties in the United States. By analyzing the benefits of diversity in surgical fields, evaluating the effectiveness of various diversity programs and initiatives, examining the comparative diversity between surgical subspecialties, and assessing the impact of diversity on patient outcomes, our aim is to highlight the critical importance of enhancing diversity in surgical fields.

RESULTS

While nuances in representation and diversity vary across surgical specialties, all fields persistently exhibit underrepresentation of certain racial/ethnic groups and persistent gender disparities. These disparities manifest throughout various phases, including in residency, and in the recruitment and retention of URM individuals in surgery and surgical subspecialties. While interventions over the past decade have contributed to improving diversity in surgical fields, significant disparities persist. Limitations include the time required for recent interventions to show significant impacts and the inability of established interventions to eliminate disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the clear benefits, diversity within surgical specialties remains an uphill battle. Addressing the diversity gap in surgical fields is crucial for improving patient outcomes, healthcare access, and workplace environments, requiring strategies such as targeted recruitment, mentorship programs, and addressing systemic biases. This review highlights the undeniable imperative for change and serve a call to action.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Leadership Attributes, Discrepancies, and Implications for Gender Equity in Vascular Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Well-developed leadership skills have been associated with a better understanding of healthcare context, increased team performance, and improved patient outcomes. Surgeons, in particular, stand to benefit from leadership development. While studies have focused on investigating knowledge gaps and needs of surgeons in leadership roles, there is a noticeable gap in the literature concerning leadership in Vascular Surgery. The goal of this study was to characterize current leadership attributes of vascular surgeons and understand demographic influences on leadership patterns.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was a descriptive analysis of vascular surgeons and their observers who took the leadership practice inventory (LPI) from 2020 to 2023. The LPI is a 30 question inventory that measures the frequency of specific leadership behaviors across five practices of leadership.

RESULTS

A total of 110 vascular surgeons completed the LPI. The majority of participants were white (56%) and identified as male (60%). Vascular surgeons most frequently observed the "enabling others to act" leadership practice style (8.90 ± 0.74) by all evaluators. Vascular surgeons were most frequently above the 70th percentile in the "challenge the process" leadership practice style (49%) compared to the average of other leaders world-wide. Observers rated vascular surgeons as displaying significantly more frequent leadership behaviors than vascular surgeons rated themselves in every leadership practice style (P-value < 0.01). The only demographic variable associated with a significantly increased occurrence of achieving 70th percentile across all five leadership practice styles was the male gender: a multivariable model adjusting for objective experience showed men were at least 3.5 times more likely to be rated above the 70th percentile than women.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular surgeons under report the frequency at which they practice leadership skills across all five leadership practice styles and should recognize their strengths of enabling others to act and challenging the process. Men are recognized as exhibiting all five leadership practices more frequently than women, regardless of current position or experience level. This observation may reflect the limited leadership positions available for women, thereby restricting their opportunities to demonstrate leadership practices as frequently or recognizably as their male counterparts.

Panel composition and disparities in the topics of presentation in vascular surgery conferences

BACKGROUND

Previous studies identified gender disparities in surgical conference presenters and moderators. We sought to assess disparities in the representation of women in terms of speakers and moderators, but with particular emphasis on panels and topics of discussion at vascular surgery conferences.

METHODS

Data regarding presenters and moderators from the Southern Association of Vascular Surgery, Western Vascular Society, Vascular and Endovascular Surgical Society, Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery, and Society for Vascular Surgery conferences was obtained from online meeting archives and via email correspondence. Scientific session speakers, moderators, and panelists were identified by sex. Specific vascular topics for each discussion were also identified. Keynote speakers or special guests were excluded.

RESULTS

Compared to men, women were less often presenters (18% versus 82%, p < .002) and moderators (16% versus 84%, p < .001) of conference sessions. Women were most likely to present on dialysis access and least likely to present on venous disease overall. Women were more likely to present on aortic (24% vs 19%; p < .013) and cerebrovascular disease (33% vs 27%; p < .021) at regional compared to national conferences. Of panels assessed, 68% were all-male. Subgroup analysis suggests that some improvements have been made over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant disparities persist in the topics presented and in panel composition suggesting potential areas for improvement in equity. Further study should focus on evaluating trends in the training level of the presenter and the topics presented, and assessing parity in structural factors that impact research presentation opportunities.

Addressing Barriers to Entry and Retention of Women in Interventional Vascular Specialties With Proposed Solutions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Representation of women in interventional vascular fields (interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery) lags behind that in other specialties. With women representing half of all medical school graduates, encouraging parity of women in these fields needs to start in medical school. Barriers to pursuing careers in vascular intervention include insufficient exposure during core clerkships, early mentorship, visibility of women in the field, length of training, lifestyle considerations, work culture and environment, and concerns about radiation exposure. This scientific statement highlights potential solutions for both the real and perceived barriers that women may face in pursuing careers in vascular intervention, including streamlining of training (as both interventional radiology and vascular surgery have done with a resultant increase in percentage of women trainees), standardization of institutional promotion of women in leadership, and professional and industry partnerships for the retention and advancement of women.

Paving a Path to Gender Parity: Recent Trends in Participation of Women in an Academic Surgery Society (Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract)

INTRODUCTION

The proportion of women surgeons is increasing, although women in surgical leadership and research has not kept pace. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT) pledged its commitment to diversity and inclusion in 2016. Our study sought to evaluate the temporal trend of gender representation in leadership, speakership, and research at SSAT.

METHODS

Publicly available SSAT meeting programs from 2010 to 2022 were reviewed to assess gender proportions within leadership positions (officers and committee chairs); invited speakerships, multidisciplinary symposia, and committee panel session moderators and speakers; and contributions to scientific sessions (moderator, first author and senior author). Verified individual professional profiles were analyzed to categorize gender as woman, man, or unavailable. Descriptive and trend analyses using linear regression and chi-squared testing were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 5506 individuals were reviewed; 1178 (21.4%) were identified as women and 4328 (78.6%) as men or did not have available data. The absolute proportion of total female participation increased by 1.05% per year (R2=0.82). There was a statistically significant difference in the total proportion of women participation before and after 2016 (18.5% vs. 27.1%, p<0.01). Increases in the proportion of women were demonstrated in leadership, invited speakerships, multidisciplinary symposia, committee panel sessions, research session moderators, and abstract first authors. The proportion of women senior authors remained stagnant.

CONCLUSION

Though this upward trajectory in SSAT women participation is encouraging, current trends predict that gender parity will not be reached until 2044.

Exploring the perception of venous disease within vascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Biases and gender disparities influence career pathways within medicine, and vascular surgery is no exception. Venous disease comprises an estimated 1% to 3% of total health care expenditures. However, its value among vascular surgeons is poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the factors that influence vascular surgeons' current perceptions of superficial and deep venous disease treatments.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was distributed electronically to practicing vascular surgeons in December 2021. The respondents were stratified by gender and practice breakdown. A venous-heavy practice was defined as a practice with venous work comprising ≥25% of the total volume. Changes in practice patterns over the respondent's career were also explored. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed using STATA (StataCorp).

RESULTS

A total of 315 practicing vascular surgeons responded, with 81.5% from the United States. Their mean age was 46.6 ± 9.6 years, and most identified as men (63.3%). The race and ethnicity breakdown was as follows: White (non-Hispanic), 63.0%; Asian or Asian Indian, 17.1%; Hispanic, Latinx, or Spanish, 8.4%; Black, 1.6%; and unknown, 9.9%. The practice settings were academic for 47.0%, private practice for 26.5%, hospital employed for 23.3%, and other for 3.2%. The female respondents were significantly younger (P < .0001), with fewer years in practice (P < .0001) and were more likely to perceive a gender bias within a career encompassing venous disease compared with the male respondents (P = .02). Of the 315 participants, 143 (45.4%) had a venous-heavy practice. No differences were found in age or gender between the venous-heavy and venous-light practices. Those with a venous-heavy practice had significantly more years in practice statistically (P = .02), had sought more venous training after graduation (P < .0001), were more likely to be in private practice (P < .0001), and were more likely to desire a practice change (P = .001) compared with those with a venous-light practice. Overall, 74.3% of respondents indicated that venous work might be less "valued" than arterial work in the field of vascular surgery. On multivariable regression, the predictors for the perception of venous work being less valued were female gender (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-4.03) and completion of a vascular surgery fellowship (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular surgeons overwhelmingly perceived the management of venous disease to be of less value than that of arterial disease, particularly by women and fellowship-trained vascular surgeons. The prevalence of venous disease, as measured by its proportion of the U.S. healthcare budget, cannot be overstated. Thus, efforts to elevate the importance of chronic venous disease within the scope of vascular surgery practices are essential to ensure patients are provided with appropriate specialty care.

A 10-Year Analysis of Representation of Women in Patent Applications and NIH Funding in Vascular Surgery

BACKGROUND

There has been an increasing focus on gender disparities in the medical field and in the field of vascular surgery specifically. We aimed to characterize gender representation in vascular surgery innovation over the past 10 years, using metrics of patents and National Institutes of Health (NIH) support.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all vascular-related patent filings (Google Scholar) and NIH-funded grants (NIH RePORTER) over a 10-year period (January 1st, 2012, to December 31st, 2021). Gender-API (Application Programming Interface) was used to identify the gender of the inventors, with manual confirmation of a 10% random sample. Gender representation for patent inventors and grant principal investigators (PIs) were compared using Chi-squared and Student's t-tests as appropriate. Yearly temporal changes in representation were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 2,992 unique vascular device patents with 6,093 associated inventors over 10 years. Women were underrepresented in patent authorship overall (11.5%), and were least likely to be listed as first inventor (8.9%) and most commonly fourth and fifth inventors (15.5% and 14.1%, respectively) compared to men. There was no significant change in representation of women inventors over time (-0.2% females per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.54 to 0.10). We identified 1736 total unique NIH grants, with 23.8% of funded projects having women PIs. There was an increase in the proportion of women PIs over time (+1.31% per year, 95% CI 0.784 to 1.855; P < 0.001). Projects with women PIs received mean total awards that were significantly lower than projects with men PIs ($350,485 ± $220,072 vs. $451,493 ± $411,040; P < 0.001), but the overall ratio of funding:women investigators improved over time (+$11,531 per year, 95% CI $6,167 to $16,895; P = 0.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

While we have made strides in increasing the number of women in the surgical research space, there is still room for improvement in funding parity. In addition, we found substantial and persistent room for improvement in representation of women in surgical innovation. As we enter a new frontier of surgery hallmarked by equalizing gender representation, these data should serve as a call-to-action for initiative aimed at rebuilding the foundation of surgical innovations upon equal gender representation.

Women of childbearing age have higher mortality rates following inpatient interventions for splenic artery aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) are the most common type of splanchnic aneurysms. Current guidelines recommend repair of all SAAs in women of childbearing age since maternal mortality is high. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment modalities and outcomes following inpatient SAA repair in women.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2012-2018 was queried. Patients with SAAs were identified utilizing International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9 and 10 codes. Childbearing age was defined as 14-49 years of age. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 561 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of SAA between the years of 2012-2018. There were 267 (47.6%) female patients and of these 103 (38.6%) were of childbearing age. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 2.7% (n=15). There were no differences in rates of elective admissions or type of repair (open versus endovascular) between women of childbearing age and the remainder of the cohort. However, women of childbearing age were significantly more likely to undergo a splenectomy compared to the remainder of the cohort (32.0% versus 21.4%, P=.028). Women of childbearing age had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared to the remainder of the cohort (5.8% versus 2.0%, P=.040). Subset analysis of the women of childbearing age revealed that those undergoing a splenectomy versus no splenectomy (14.8% versus 2.6%, P=.039) and those treated in the non-elective versus elective setting (10.5% versus 0%, P=.032) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality. There was one patient with an ICD code associated with pregnancy and they survived.

CONCLUSION

Women of childbearing age had higher in-hospital mortality following inpatient interventions for SAAs with all of the deaths occurring in the non-elective setting. These data support the pursuit of aggressive elective treatment of SAAs in women of childbearing age.

Who are the Vascular Society Presidents?

BACKGROUND

We noted distinct differences between the demographics among the presidents of various vascular societies. To help characterize these among the present United States, Canadian, and European vascular societies, we queried the websites for the United States, Canadian, and European vascular societies in a systematic review for the names of their presidents since their respective inceptions.

METHODS

Age and ethnicity were determined by a search on healthgrades.com, Google, and online obituaries. The year of ascendency to the presidency and the year of birth were used as identifying time points.

RESULTS

There are significant differences between the ages of the presidents of the various vascular societies. While the presidents of Vascular and Endovascular Surgical Society were significantly younger than those of every other vascular society examined, Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society, Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery, and Society of Vascular Medicine were also significantly younger than the remainder of the societies examined (P < 0.0001). The presidents of the remaining societies were not significantly different in age from each other. When comparing the ages of the presidents in the first and last decades of each society, 2 were found to have significantly increased (Society of Vascular Medicine [P = 0.0029] and Vascular and Endovascular Surgical Society [P < 0.0001]), while 2 others were found to have significantly decreased (New England Society for Vascular Surgery [P = 0.0092] and Eastern Vascular Society [P = 0.0085]). Of the 532 total entries for these presidents examined over these 13 societies, 19 (3.6%) of these were filled by women and 37 (7%) with minorities.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a great deal of variability in terms of age, gender, and minority representation of the presidents among the vascular societies examined. While the share of women and minorities to serve as presidents in vascular societies varied between societies, both groups were under-represented across the board. However, in recent years, the number of women and minorities elected as presidents of vascular societies has been trending upwards.

Sentiment Analysis of Online Patient-Written Reviews of Vascular Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Online patient reviews influence a patient's choice of a vascular surgeon. The aim of this study is to examine underlying factors that contribute to positive and negative patient reviews by leveraging sentiment analysis and machine learning methods.

METHODS

The Society of Vascular Surgeons publicly accessible member directory was queried and cross-referenced with a popular patient-maintained physician review website, healthgrades.com. Sentiment analysis and machine learning methods were used to analyze several parameters. Demographics (gender, age, and state of practice), star rating (of 5 stars), and written reviews were obtained for corresponding vascular surgeons. A sentiment analysis model was applied to patient-written reviews and validated against the star ratings. Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance assessed demographic relationships with reviews. Word frequency assessments and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify common and determinative components of written reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 1,799 vascular surgeons had public profiles with reviews. Female gender of surgeon was associated with lower star ratings (male = 4.19, female = 3.95, P < 0.01) and average sentiment score (male = 0.50, female = 0.40, P < 0.01). Younger physician age was associated with higher star rating (P = 0.02) but not average sentiment score (P = 0.12). In the Best reviews, the most commonly used one-words were Care (N = 999), Caring (N = 767), and Kind (N = 479), while the most commonly used two-word pairs were Saved/Life (N = 189), Feel/Comfortable (N = 106), and Kind/Caring (N = 104). For the Worst reviews, the most commonly used one-words were Pain (N = 254) and Rude (N = 148), while the most commonly used two-word pairs were No/One (N = 27), Waste/Time (N = 25), and Severe/Pain (N = 18). In a multiple logistic regression, satisfactory reviews were associated with words such as Confident (odds ratio [OR] = 8.93), Pain-free (OR = 4.72), Listens (OR = 2.55), and Bedside Manner (OR = 1.70), while unsatisfactory reviews were associated with words such as Rude (OR = 0.01), Arrogant (OR = 0.09), Infection (OR = 0.20), and Wait (OR = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Female surgeons received significantly worse reviews and younger surgeons tended to receive better reviews. The positivity and negativity of reviews were largely related to words associated with the patient-doctor experience and pain. Vascular surgeons should focus on these 2 areas to improve patient experiences and their own reviews.