National trends and variability of atherectomy use for peripheral vascular interventions from 2010 to 2019

Device regulation and surveillance in vascular care: Challenges and opportunities

Cardiovascular devices are essential for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including cerebrovascular, coronary, valvular, congenital, peripheral vascular and arrhythmic diseases. The regulation and surveillance of vascular devices in real-world practice, however, presents challenges during each individual product's life cycle. Four examples illustrate recent challenges and questions regarding safety, appropriate use and efficacy arising from FDA approved devices used in real-world practice. We outline potential pathways wherein providers, regulators and payors could potentially provide high-quality cardiovascular care, identify safety signals, ensure equitable device access, and study potential issues with devices in real-world practice.

Comparison of endovascular therapies for chronic limb-threatening ischemia and claudication

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of regional data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) suggested improved survival for patients undergoing stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty and atherectomy. Using national data from the VQI linked to Medicare claims data through the Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network program, this study aimed to compare the rates of mortality, reintervention, and amputation after endovascular interventions (atherectomy, stenting, and balloon angioplasty) for two separate cohorts: patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and patients with claudication.

METHODS

This was a secondary data analysis of Society for Vascular Surgery National VQI data linked to Medicare claims, between October 2016 and December 2019. Patients aged ≥65 years with symptoms of claudication or CLTI and a diagnosis of occlusive disease were included. Urgent or emergent interventions or those with concurrent procedures (endarterectomy, bypass, or bilateral intervention) were excluded. Interventions were grouped into (1) balloon angioplasty only; (2) stent (with or without balloon angioplasty); or (3) atherectomy (alone, with or without stent, with or without balloon angioplasty). Propensity score-matched cohorts were constructed to conduct pairwise intervention comparisons of mortality, reintervention, and amputation rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive propensity scores for each patient. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 9785 (2665 claudication, 7120 CLTI) eligible patients were identified. After propensity score matching for the CLTI group, 2826, 3608, and 2796 pairs of cases were used to compare balloon angioplasty vs atherectomy, balloon angioplasty vs stent, and stent vs atherectomy, respectively. No statistically significant difference in mortality was observed among all interventions. However, atherectomy was associated with a significant increase in reintervention rate compared with balloon angioplasty (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.39; P = .01) and compared with stenting (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.46; P < .01) within the first year after the index procedure. Of note, both atherectomy (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P < .05) and stenting (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90; P < .01) showed lower rates of major amputation when compared with balloon angioplasty within 1 year after the index procedure. In the claudication group, there were no significant differences observed among interventions for peripheral arterial disease for mortality, reintervention, or amputation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to identify appropriate indications for atherectomy, because there may be a subset of patients with CLTI who benefit from this therapy with respect to amputation rates. Until then, caution should be exercised when using atherectomy because it is also associated with higher reintervention rates.

Efficiency and safety of dual pathway inhibition for the prevention of femoropopliteal artery restenosis in repeated endovascular interventions

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal strategy for evaluating the efficiency and safety of dual-pathway inhibition (DPI) in preventing femoropopliteal restenosis in patients undergoing repeated endovascular interventions. Despite several therapeutic interventions available for preventing femoropopliteal restenosis post repeated endovascular interventions, the ideal strategy, particularly evaluating the efficacy and safety of DPI, remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

From January 2015 to September 2021, patients who underwent repeated endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal restenosis were compared with those who underwent DPI or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after surgery using a propensity score-matched analysis. The primary outcome was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The principal safety outcome was a composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. To further enhance the rigor, Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and sensitivity analyses, as well as subgroup analyses were employed, reducing potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients were included in our study, of whom 294 (66.7%) received DAPT and 147 (33.1%) received DPI, with 114 matched pairs (mean age, 72.21 years; 84.2% male). Cumulative probability of CD-TLR at 36 months in the DPI group (17%) trended lower than that in the DAPT group (32%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.78; P =.004). The cumulative probability of freedom from CD-TLR at 36 months in the DPI group was 83%. No significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of major or CRNM bleeding between the DPI and DAPT groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.34 to 4.69; P = .730). The DPI group was associated with significantly lower rates of CD-TLR in the main subgroup analyses of diabetes (P = .001), previous smoking history (P = .008), longer lesion length (>10 cm) (P = .003), and treatment with debulking strategy (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In our investigation focused on CD-TLR, we found that DPI exhibited a significant reduction in the risk of reintervention compared with other treatment modalities. This underscores the potential of DPI as a viable therapeutic strategy in preventing reinterventions. Moreover, our assessment of safety outcomes revealed that the bleeding risks associated with DPI were on par with DAPT, thereby not compromising patient safety. These findings pave the way for potential broader clinical implications, emphasizing the effectiveness and safety of DPI in the context of reducing reintervention risks.

Sex-specific analysis of intravascular lithotripsy for peripheral artery disease from the Disrupt PAD III observational study

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular therapy of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with higher complication rates and worse outcomes in women vs men. Although intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has shown similarly favorable outcomes in men and women in calcified coronary arteries, there is no published safety and effectiveness data of peripheral IVL differentiated by sex. This study aims to evaluate sex-specific acute procedural safety and effectiveness following IVL treatment of calcified PAD.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of the multicenter Disrupt PAD III Observational Study, which assessed short-term procedural outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of symptomatic calcified lower extremity PAD with the Shockwave peripheral IVL system. Adjudicated acute safety and efficacy outcomes were compared by sex using univariate analysis performed with the χ2 test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 1262 patients (29.9% women) were included, with >85% having moderate to severe lesion calcification. Women were older (74 vs 71 years; P < .001), had lower ankle-brachial index (0.7 vs 0.8; P = .003), smaller reference vessel size (5.3 vs 5.6 mm; P = .009), and more severe stenosis at baseline vs men (82.3% vs 79.8%; P = .012). Rates of diabetes, renal insufficiency, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, lesion length, and atherectomy use were similar in both groups. Residual stenosis after IVL alone was significantly reduced in both groups. Final residual stenosis was 21.9% in women and 24.7% in men (P = .001). Serious angiographic complications were infrequent and similar in both groups (1.4% vs 0.6%; P = .21), with no abrupt vessel closure, distal embolization, or thrombotic events during any procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IVL to treat calcified PAD in this observational registry demonstrated favorable acute safety and effectiveness in both women and men.

Effects of atherectomy on major adverse limb events for femoropopliteal interventions: Vascular Quality Initiative registry

BACKGROUND

Atherectomy use in treatment of femoropopliteal disease has significantly increased despite scant evidence of benefit to long-term clinical outcomes.

AIMS

We investigated the clinical benefits of atherectomy over standard treatment for femoropopliteal interventions.

METHODS

Using data from the Society of Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry, we identified patients who underwent isolated femoropopliteal interventions for occlusive disease. We compared 13,423 patients treated with atherectomy with 47,371 receiving standard treatment; both groups were allowed definitive treatment with a drug-coated balloon or stenting. The primary endpoint was major adverse limb events (MALEs), which is a composite of target vessel re-occlusion, ipsilateral major amputation, and target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Mean age was 69 ± 11 years, and patients were followed for a median of 30 months. Overall rates of complications were slightly higher in the atherectomy group than the standard treatment group (6.2% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, atherectomy use was associated with a 13% reduction in risk of MALEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.98). Rates of major and minor amputations were significantly lower in the atherectomy group (3.2% vs. 4.6% and 3.3% vs. 4.3%, respectively, both p < 0.001), primarily driven by a significantly decreased risk of major amputations (aOR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). There were no differences in 30-day mortality, primary patency, and target vessel revascularization between the atherectomy and standard treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults undergoing femoropopliteal interventions, the use of atherectomy was associated with a reduction in MALEs compared with standard treatment.

Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in octogenarians and nonagenarians for intermittent claudication

OBJECTIVE

Revascularization for intermittent claudication (IC) due to infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is dependent on durability and expected benefit. We aimed to assess outcomes for IC interventions in octogenarians and nonagenarians (age ≥80 years) and those younger than 80 years (age <80 years).

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried (2010-2020) for peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypasses (IIBs) performed to treat IC. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were analyzed (comparing age ≥80 years and age <80 years).

RESULTS

There were 84,210 PVIs (12.1% age ≥80 years and 87.9% age <80 years) and 10,980 IIBs (7.4% age ≥80 years and 92.6% age <80 years) for IC. For PVI, patients aged ≥80 years more often underwent femoropopliteal (70.7% vs 58.1%) and infrapopliteal (19% vs 9.3%) interventions, and less often iliac interventions (32.1% vs 48%) (P < .001 for all). Patients aged ≥80 years had more perioperative hematomas (3.5% vs 2.4%) and 30-day mortality (0.9% vs 0.4%) (P < .001). At 1-year post-intervention, the age ≥80 years cohort had fewer independently ambulatory patients (80% vs 91.5%; P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients aged ≥80 years had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (81.4% vs 86.8%), amputation-free survival (87.1% vs 94.1%), and survival (92.3% vs 96.8%) (P < .001) at 1-year after PVI. Risk adjusted analysis showed that age ≥80 years was associated with higher reintervention/amputation/death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.35), amputation/death (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.61-2.13), and mortality (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.66-2.23) (P < .001 for all) for PVI. For IIB, patients aged ≥80 years more often had an infrapopliteal target (28.4% vs 19.4%) and had higher 30-day mortality (1.3% vs 0.5%), renal failure (4.1% vs 2.2%), and cardiac complications (5.4% vs 3.1%) (P < .001). At 1 year, the age ≥80 years group had fewer independently ambulatory patients (81.7% vs 88.8%; P = .02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the age ≥80 years cohort had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (75.7% vs 81.5%), amputation-free survival (86.9% vs 93.9%), and survival (90.4% vs 96.5%) (P < .001 for all). Risk-adjusted analysis showed age ≥80 years was associated with higher amputation/death (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.1-2.54; P = .015) and mortality (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16-2.93; P = .009), but not reintervention/amputation/death (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.85-1.44; P = .47) after IIB.

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarians and nonagenarians have greater perioperative morbidity and long-term ambulatory impairment, limb loss, and mortality after PVI and IIB for claudication. Risks of intervention on elderly patients with claudication should be carefully weighed against the perceived benefits of revascularization. Medical and exercise therapy efforts should be maximized in this population.

Market competition influences practice patterns in management of patients with intermittent claudication in the vascular quality initiative

OBJECTIVE

The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) clinical practice guidelines recommend best medical therapy (BMT) as first-line therapy before offering revascularization to patients with intermittent claudication (IC). Notably, atherectomy and tibial-level interventions are generally discouraged for management of IC; however, high regional market competition may incentivize physicians to treat patients outside the scope of guideline-directed therapy. Therefore, we sought to determine the association between regional market competition and endovascular treatment of patients with IC.

METHODS

We examined patients with IC undergoing index endovascular peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) in the SVS Vascular Quality Initiative from 2010 to 2022. We assigned the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index as a measure of regional market competition and stratified centers into very high competition (VHC), high competition, moderate competition, and low competition cohorts. We defined BMT as preoperative documentation of being on antiplatelet medication, statin, nonsmoking status, and a recorded ankle-brachial index. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association of market competition with patient and procedural characteristics. A sensitivity analysis was performed in patients with isolated femoropopliteal disease matched by the TransAtlantic InterSociety classification of disease severity.

RESULTS

There were 24,669 PVIs that met the inclusion criteria. Patients with IC undergoing PVI were more likely to be on BMT when treated in higher market competition centers (odds ratio [OR], 1.07 per increase in competition quartile; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.11; P < .0001). The probability of undergoing aortoiliac interventions decreased with increasing competition (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.87; P < .0001), but there were higher odds of receiving tibial (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.30-1.50; P < .0001) and multilevel interventions in VHC vs low competition centers (femoral + tibial OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14; P = .001). Stenting decreased as competition increased (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92; P < .0001), whereas exposure to atherectomy increased with higher market competition (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.19; P < .0001). When assessing patients undergoing single-artery femoropopliteal intervention for TransAtlantic InterSociety A or B lesions to account for disease severity, the odds of undergoing either balloon angioplasty (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.625-0.840; P < .0001) or stenting only (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.727-0.966; P < .0001) were lower in VHC centers. Similarly, the likelihood of receiving atherectomy remained significantly higher in VHC centers (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.36-1.84; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

High market competition was associated with more procedures among patients with claudication that are not consistent with guideline-directed therapy per the SVS clinical practice guidelines, including atherectomy and tibial-level interventions. This analysis demonstrates the susceptibility of care delivery to regional market competition and signifies a novel and undefined driver of PVI variation among patients with claudication.

Effectiveness and Safety of Atherectomy versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Limb Salvage in Tibioperoneal Arterial Disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of atherectomy versus plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) for treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to tibioperoneal arterial disease (TPAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry who had CLI (Rutherford Class 4-6) and underwent atherectomy versus POBA alone for isolated TPAD were retrospectively identified. Of eligible patients, a cohort of 2,908 patients was propensity matched 1:1 by clinical and angiographic characteristics. The atherectomy group comprised 1,454 patients with 2,183 arteries treated, and the POBA group comprised 1,454 patients with 2,141 arteries treated. The primary study endpoint was major ipsilateral limb amputation. Secondary endpoints were minor ipsilateral amputations, any ipsilateral amputation, primary patency, target vessel reintervention (TVR), and wound healing at 12 months.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 507 days, the mean patient age was 69 years ± 11.7, and the mean occluded length was 6.9 cm ± 6.5. There was a trend toward higher technical success rates with atherectomy than with POBA (92.9% vs 91.0%, respectively; P = .06). The rates of major adverse events during the procedure were not significantly different. The 12-month major amputation rate was similar in the atherectomy and POBA groups (4.5% vs 4.6%, respectively; P = .92; odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.68-1.37). There was no difference in 12-month TVR (17.9% vs 17.8%; P = .97) or primary patency (56.4% vs 54.5%; P = .64) between the atherectomy and POBA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large national registry, treatment of CLI from TPAD using atherectomy versus POBA showed no significant differences in procedural adverse events, major amputations, TVR, or vessel patency at 12 months.

Variations in Practice Patterns for Peripheral Vascular Interventions Across Clinical Settings

BACKGROUND

Peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for lower extremity peripheral artery disease have been increasing, particularly in the office-based setting. Our goal was to evaluate practice patterns for PVI by site of service using a contemporary real-world dataset.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry was queried from 2010-2021. Site of service was classified as hospital/inpatient, hospital/outpatient, and ambulatory/office-based center. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and periprocedural outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 54,897 hospital/inpatient (43.2%), 64,105 hospital/outpatient (50.4%), and 8,179 ambulatory/office-based center (6.4%) PVI. When comparing the 2 outpatient settings, ambulatory/office-based center patients were older than hospital/outpatient (mean age 70.7 vs. 68.7 years), more often female sex (41.4% vs. 39.1%), never smokers (27.5% vs. 18.5%), primary Medicare (61.6% vs. 55.9%), nonambulatory (6.5% vs. 4.7%), less often with coronary artery disease (30.2% vs. 34.1%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (18.1% vs. 26.9%), congestive heart failure (13% vs. 17.2%), obesity (30.9% vs. 33.6%), and less often on a statin (71.4% vs. 76.1%) (P < 0.001). Ambulatory/office-based center procedures were more likely for claudication (60.1% vs. 55.8%), more often involved femoro-popliteal (73.1% vs. 64.6%) and infrapopliteal (36.7% vs. 24.3%), and less often iliac interventions (24.1% vs. 33.6%) (P < 0.001).Overall, atherectomy was used in 14.2% of hospital/inpatient, 19.4% of hospital/outpatient, and 63.4% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. Stents were used in 41.8% of hospital/inpatient, 45.1% of hospital/outpatient, and 48.8% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. However, stent grafts were used in 12.5% of hospital/inpatient, 8.8% of hospital/outpatient, and only 1.3% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. On multivariable analysis, compared with hospital/inpatient, atherectomy use was associated with ambulatory/office-based center setting (Odds ratio 10.9, 95% confidence interval 10.3-11.5, P < 0.001) and hospital/outpatient setting (Odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.51-1.62, P < 0.001). Periprocedure complications including hematoma requiring intervention (0.3%), any stenosis/occlusion (0.2%), and distal embolization (0.6%) were quite low across all settings.

CONCLUSIONS

There are substantial variations in patient populations, procedural indications, and types of interventions undertaken during PVI across different locations. Ambulatory/office-based procedures more commonly treat claudicants, use atherectomy, and less often use stent grafts. Further research is warranted to investigate long-term trends in practice patterns and long-term outcomes, for PVI in the ever-expanding ambulatory/office-based setting.

State-of-the-Art Endovascular Therapies for the Femoropopliteal Segment: Are We There Yet?

Peripheral arterial disease is an increasingly prevalent condition with significant associated morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditure. Endovascular interventions are appropriate for most patients with either ongoing symptoms of intermittent claudication despite lifestyle and medical optimization or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The femoropopliteal segment is the most common arterial culprit responsible for claudication and the most commonly revascularized segment. Endovascular approaches to revascularization of the femoropopliteal segment are advancing with an evolving landscape of techniques for arterial access, device-based therapies, vessel preparation, and intraprocedural imaging. These advances have been marked by debate and controversy, notably related to the safety of paclitaxel-based devices and necessity of atherectomy. In this review, we provide a critical overview of the current evidence, practice patterns, emerging evidence, and technological advances for endovascular intervention of the femoropopliteal arterial segment.