Aspiration thrombectomy for acute iliofemoral or central deep venous thrombosis

Current Evidence for Endovascular Therapies in the Management of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

Acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), specifically proximal iliofemoral DVT, is a relatively common disorder that can result in a chronic debilitating post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), with a significant effect on a patient's quality of life. Anticoagulation is first-line therapy; however, percutaneous interventions have emerged as treatment options for patients where there is concern that anticoagulation alone will not resolve the DVT as well as prevent PTS. This paper will discuss the existing data on these interventions and review current endovascular techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and large-bore mechanical thrombectomy in the management of DVT.

Endovascular treatment of lower limb acute DVT: current trends and future directions

AIM OF THE STUDY: This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and comparative outcomes of endovascular treatments for acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT), including catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT), mechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, drawing insights from a diverse range of studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search identified 33 relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and case reports. Data extraction focused on study design, intervention type, outcome measures, and follow-up duration.

RESULTS

Catheter-directed thrombolysis demonstrates promising results in enhancing venous patency and reducing post-thrombotic syndrome, with careful patient selection being crucial. Pharmacomechanical and mechanical thrombectomy devices offer immediate and long-term benefits, emphasizing individualized patient care. Venous stenting serves as a crucial adjunctive therapy, particularly in cases of residual venous obstruction, though further research is needed for optimal patient selection and long-term outcomes. Timing and selection of endovascular interventions remain critical considerations, necessitating multidisciplinary approaches and ongoing research.

CONCLUSION

This review provides valuable insights for clinicians and researchers, guiding evidence-based decision-making and shaping future research directions in the dynamic field of endovascular interventions for acute lower limb DVT.

Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches with a Mechanical Thrombectomy Device for the Treatment of Acute Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of antegrade and retrograde approaches with the AngioJet thrombectomy device for the treatment of acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and to evaluate the necessity of filter placement.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with acute lower limb DVT treated with the AngioJet device from January 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the antegrade and retrograde treatment groups according to the surgical approach and the direction of valve opening. The thrombosis interception rate of the filter, incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), thrombectomy effectiveness, venous obstruction rate, and thrombosis recurrence rate of each treatment group were evaluated. In addition, factors affecting patency were analyzed.

RESULTS

AngioJet was employed for 84 patients with acute lower limb DVT, treating a total of 88 limbs. The thrombosis interception rate of the filter was 35.7% (30 patients). The incidence of new PE or PE exacerbation was 6.0% (5 patients), and a filter retrieval rate of 97.6% (82 patients) was detected. Thrombus removal of grade III occurred in 35 (64.8%) of the 54 limbs (61.4%) in the antegrade treatment group versus 13 (38.2%) of the 34 limbs (38.6%) in the retrograde treatment group (P < 0.05). At 3 months, venous patency and bleeding events involved 52 (96.3%) and 4 (7.4%) limbs in the antegrade treatment group, respectively, versus 29 (85.3%) and 2 (5.9%) in the retrograde treatment group, respectively (P > 0.05). Regression analysis was performed to determine factors that may affect 3-month patency in both groups. Statistically significant linear relationships were found between 3-month patency and thrombus removal rate [odds ratio [OR] = 0.546 (0.326, 0.916)], thrombus formation time [OR = 1.018 (1.002, 1.036)], and preoperative thrombosis score [OR = 1.012 (1.002, 1.022)] in the antegrade treatment group, as well as thrombus removal rate [0.473 (0.229, 0.977)] in the retrograde treatment group. In regression analysis of factors affecting patency in both groups and the venous clinical severity score/Villalta score, a statistically significant linear relationship was found between thrombus formation time and the venous clinical severity score in the antegrade treatment group [0.576 (0.467, 0.710)].

CONCLUSIONS

Both antegrade and retrograde approaches are safe and effective for the treatment of acute lower limb DVT. There are no differences in 3-month deep vein patency and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) incidence rates. Individuals with acute lower limb DVT are at high risk of thrombus shedding after treatment with AngioJet thrombectomy, and placement of a vena cava filter (VCF) is recommended for effective interception.

Preclinical evaluation of a novel endovascular thrombectomy device in a modified swine model for iliac vein thrombosis

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel endovascular thrombectomy device in a modified swine model of iliac vein thrombosis.

Methods

A modified swine model for iliac vein thrombosis was created using proximal‒distal balloon occlusion combined with autologous venous thrombus and thrombin injections. The safety and efficacy of the newly developed Zylox endovascular thrombectomy system were evaluated in this animal model and its performance was compared with that of the AcoStream aspiration thrombectomy device.

Results

Bilateral iliac vein thrombosis models were successfully created in 12 swine, with 23 iliac veins used for device testing and one for anatomical observation. The thrombus length in the Zylox group was greater than in the AcoStream group (98.42 ± 17.56 mm vs. 84.12 ± 13.30 mm), while thrombus scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Although Grade I thrombus clearance was achieved in all iliac veins in both groups, blood loss in the Zylox group was significantly less than in the AcoStream group (81.09 ± 27.26 ml vs. 162.50 ± 61.96 ml, P < 0.001). Three swine (6 iliac veins) in each group underwent repeat venography evaluations 28 days postthrombectomy, showing that all the veins were patent without any rethrombosis. Histopathologic evaluation immediately and 28 days postthrombectomy revealed no differences between the two groups. No complications or deaths occurred in the swine during the entire process.

Conclusion

The current modified swine model is stable, reproducible, and appropriate for testing endovascular devices. This study preliminarily verified the safety and efficacy of the Zylox thrombectomy system for thrombus removal in this animal model and demonstrated its advantage in controlling blood loss. Future randomized controlled trials in humans are needed to further verify the safety and efficacy of the device.

Initial experience with the ambulatory management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with May-Thurner syndrome with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVE

Patients undergoing intervention for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) typically require inpatient (IP) hospitalization for initial treatment with anticoagulation and management with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. Direct oral anticoagulants and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) devices offer the opportunity for outpatient (OP) management. We describe our approach with these patients.

METHODS

Patients receiving intervention for acute IFDVT from January 2020 through October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing unilateral thrombectomy, venous angioplasty, and stenting for IFDVT with MTS comprised the study population and were divided into two groups: (1) patients admitted to the hospital and treated as IPs and (2) patients who underwent therapy as OPs. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural success, complications, and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients were treated for IFDVT with thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting of whom 58 comprised the IP group and 34 the OP group. All 92 patients underwent PMT using the Inari ClotTriever (Inari Medical), intravascular ultrasound, angioplasty, and stenting with 100% technical success. Three patients in the IP group required adjuvant thrombolysis. There was no difference in primary patency of the treated IFDVT segment at 12 months between the two groups (IP, 73.5%; OP, 86.7%; P = .21, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute IFDVT and MTS deemed appropriate for thrombectomy and iliac revascularization can be managed with initiation of ambulatory direct oral anticoagulant therapy and subsequent return for ambulatory PMT, angioplasty, and stenting. This approach avoids the expense of IP care and allows for effective use of resources at a time when staffing and supply chain shortages have led to inefficiencies in the provision of IP care for nonemergent conditions.

Outcomes From Mechanical Thrombectomy for Deep Vein Thrombosis: Insights From the PINC AI Healthcare Database

Background

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is playing an increasingly important role in treating deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Although degrees of safety and efficacy have been shown in independent studies, there remains a lack of comparative evidence between MT devices. To address this, we aimed to compare demographics, clinical outcomes, and resource metrics of patients receiving MT for DVT with 3 common devices using a real-world database.

Methods

Patients receiving MT for DVT between January 2018 and March 2022 were identified from the PINC AI Healthcare Database and divided into analysis populations for the AngioJet ZelanteDVT (AJ), the ClotTriever system (CT), and the Indigo system (IN). Rates of in-hospital mortality, resource utilization, and 30-day readmission were compared. Regression modeling was performed to adjust for potential covariates and compare outcomes.

Results

A total of 4455 MT encounters were identified and met inclusion criteria (AJ, 1753; CT, 1344; IN, 1358). In-hospital mortality ranged from 1.0% (CT) to 2.9% (IN), with modeling predicting significantly higher odds for the AJ (odds ratio [OR], 3.42) and IN (OR, 3.38) groups. Similarly, higher rates of resource utilization were predicted in the AJ and IN groups when compared with the reference group (CT). Average costs ranged from $29,549 (CT: SD, $30,705) to $42,705 (IN: SD, $41,114). Thirty-day readmissions ranged from 10.0% (AJ) to 14.6% (IN), while modeling predicted significantly greater odds for the IN group (OR, 1.47).

Conclusions

These results suggest that all MT interventions may be unequal in terms of outcomes and resources, with the CT device associated with lower in-hospital mortality and resource burden.

Calf deep veins are safe and feasible accesses for the endovascular treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

This study was designed to assess the optimal access route for the endovascular treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis who underwent endovascular treatment from February 2009 to December 2020. Patients underwent non-direct calf deep vein puncture (NDCDVP) from February 2009 to December 2011 and direct calf deep vein puncture (DCDVP) from January 2012 to December 2020. Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) was used to treat all patients in the NDCDVP group, whereas patients in the DCDVP group were treated with CDT or the AngioJet rhyolitic thrombectomy system. In patients exhibiting iliac vein compression syndrome, the iliac vein was dilated and implanted with a stent. Technical success rates and perioperative complication rates were compared between these two treatment groups. The NDCDVP group included 83 patients (40 males, 43 females) with a mean age of 55 ± 16 years, while the DCDVP group included 487 patients (231 males. 256 females) with a mean age of 56 ± 15 years. No significant differences were observed between these groups with respect to any analyzed clinical characteristics. The technical success rates in the NDCDVP and DCDVP groups were 96.4 and 98.2%, respectively (P > 0.05). In the NDCDVP group, the small saphenous vein (SSV)or great saphenous vein (GSV)were the most common access routes (77.1%, 64/83), whereas the anterior tibial vein (ATV) was the most common access route in the DCDVP group (78.0%, 380/487), followed by the posterior tibial vein (PTV) and peroneal vein (PV)(15.6% and 6.4%, respectively). Relative to the NDCDVP group, more patients in the DCDVP group underwent the removal of deep vein clots below the knee (7.2% [6/83] vs. 24.2% [118/487], P < 0.001). Moreover, relative to the NDCDVP group, significantly lower complication rates were evident in the DCDVP group (local infection: 10.8% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001; local hematoma: 15.7% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001). The position change rate was also significantly lower in the DCDVP group relative to the NDCDVP group (0% [0/487] vs. 60.2% [50/83], P < 0.001). The calf deep veins (CDVs) represent a feasible and safe access route for the endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy results in good safety and short-term outcomes in the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-term outcomes and safety of syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study of hospitalized patients with iliofemoral and/or inferior vena caval deep venous thrombosis, excluding those with pulmonary embolism. We collected the following patient data from the electronic medical records: age, sex, provoked/unprovoked deep venous thrombosis, symptom duration, thrombosed segments, and the presence of a tumor, thrombophilia, diabetes, and/or iliac vein compression syndrome. Venography and computed tomographic venography were performed in all patients before the procedure. All patients underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy under local anesthesia and sedation, and all received low-molecular-weight heparin peri-operatively. All patients underwent implantation of an inferior vena caval filter. Rivaroxaban was administered post-procedure, instead of heparin, for 3-6 months, with lower extremity compression.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 patients with deep venous thrombosis underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy from January 2022 to October 2022 in our institution. Technical success (>70% thrombus resolution) was achieved in all patients, and using a single procedure in 25/29 patients (86%). Concomitant stenting was performed in 18/29 (62%) of the patients, and 21/29 (69%) underwent angioplasty. The median (interquartile range) procedure time was 110 min (100-122), the median intra-operative bleeding volume was 150 mL (120-180), and the median decrease in the hemoglobin concentration from pre- to post-operative was 7 g/L (4-14). The median follow-up duration was 7 months (5-9). All patients obtained symptomatic relief, and 27/29 achieved near-remission or full remission (combined total). No patients experienced peri-operative bleeding complications, or symptom recurrence or post-thrombectomy syndrome during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcomes following syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis were excellent, and the procedure was safe.

In Vivo Porcine Model of Acute Iliocaval Deep Vein Thrombosis

CLINICAL IMPACT

The study establishes a rapid, technically straightforward, and reproducible porcine large animal model for acute iliocaval deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The procedure can be performed with basic endovascular skillsets. With its procedural efficiency and consistency, the platform is promising for comparative in vivo testing of venous thrombectomy devices in a living host, and for future verification and validation studies to determine efficacy of novel thrombectomy devices relative to predicates.

The emerging role of mechanical thrombectomy in acute DVT management

Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in various technical combinations have been the main driver of acute deep venous interventions for over a decade. While the majority of high-level evidence was based on it, CDT requires longer procedural care and is associated to a small but not negligible bleeding risk. Contemporary DVT intervention, following the paradigm shift in myocardial infarction and stroke management, has steadily migrated towards minimizing or eliminating thrombolytics due to the introduction of mechanical/aspiration thrombectomy. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) devices are undoubtedly improving our ability to remove thrombus more efficiently in a single session without the adverse events and complex logistics related to the use of thrombolytics.

Mechanical thrombectomy of inferior vena cava filter-associated caval thrombosis using FlowTriever and ClotTriever systems

OBJECTIVE

Chronically indwelling inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) can have multiple adverse sequelae, including IVCF-associated thrombosis. The Inari ClotTriever and FlowTriever mechanical and aspiration thrombectomy systems (Inari Medical) can be used for acute caval thrombosis associated with IVCFs if appropriate proximal IVCF protection is used intraprocedurally. The present study reports a single institution's outcomes after ClotTriever and FlowTriever thrombectomy of acute IVCF-associated iliocaval thrombus.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent ClotTriever or FlowTriever thrombectomy for IVCF-associated caval thrombosis. The patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and postprocedural outcomes of a 15-patient cohort were compiled and described.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients were identified as presenting with acute IVCF-associated caval thrombosis and having undergone intervention with either the ClotTriever or FlowTriever system from 2019 to 2022. Of the 15 patients in the cohort, 3 (20%) had presented with a threatened extremity (phlegmasia cerulea dolens), and 12 had presented with severe, debilitating, but non-limb-threatening, lower extremity edema. The preprocedural clot burden was significant and involved the cava, iliac veins, and femoropopliteal veins in 7 of 15 patients (47%) in the cohort. The procedure was technically successful in 11 patients (73.33%). Resolution of acute symptoms was noted in 100% of the technically successful procedures. The 30-day mortality rate was 13% (2 of 15 patients). One intraprocedural death occurred from pulmonary embolism, and one patient died of malignancy complications. The surviving patients not lost to follow-up experienced stable or improving venous disease, with only one patient presenting with post-phlebitic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical and aspiration thrombectomy of IVCF-associated thrombus with the FlowTriever and ClotTriever systems have good technical success and resulted in significant improvement in acute symptoms with adequate clot clearance. Proximal embolic protection maneuvers for pulmonary embolism prophylaxis and preexisting filter protection are required intraprocedurally.

The Prevalence of Cardiovascular Complications and Causes of AngioJet Failure: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study Based on the MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) Database

Background and objective Aspiration thrombectomy devices, such as the AngioJet Solent Omni (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA) have been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of thrombi in peripheral arterial disease, venous disease, and AV fistulas. However, there is a dearth of real-world data on the most common modes of failure and complications associated with the AngioJet Solent Omni. In this study, we aimed to address this scarcity of data. Methods The MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database was queried for reports of device failure and adverse events spanning the period from October 2012 to December 2021. Results A total of 499 events were reported during the study period. After the exclusion of duplicate reports, the final analysis included 450 reports. The most common mode of failure was catheter breakage/kinking during suction thrombectomy with 137 reports (30%). The most common vessel associated with events was the superficial femoral artery or vein, which was documented in 82 reports (18.2%). The most common adverse clinical outcome was the embedding of a piece of the device in the patient, which occurred in seven reports (1.6%). There were seven (1.6%) events of death reported during the period studied. Conclusions Based on our findings, theAngioJet Solent Omni device provides promising results; however, it is important to evaluate device safety. It is associated with complications including device embedment, catheter breakage/kinking, and death, and these adverse events are linked to patient characteristics and risk factors.

Acute problems of hemodialysis access: Thrombosis, aneurysms, symptomatic high-flow fistulas, and complications related to central lines

Hemodynamic complications frequently affect vascular access and are important causes of morbidity and mortality. We present a review of acute complications affecting vascular accesses, focusing on classical and new treatments. Acute complications in hemodialysis vascular access are often underestimated and undertreated, and can present a challenge for both vascular surgeons and anesthesiologists. Accordingly, we considered different anesthesiologic approaches to both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic patients. A strict collaboration among nephrologists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists can potentially improve prevention and management of acute complications and quality of life.

Massive DVT from the proximal IVC to the pedal vein: Our approach using aspiration mechanical thrombectomy and open surgery thrombectomy

Deep venous thrombosis might present in an acute condition requiring early thrombus removal. Several endovascular and surgical approaches are available with a short treatment time and minimal complications compared to pharmacotherapies. However, due to a lack of evidence, these are not the first treatment choice for deep vein thrombosis. Our case report showed a successful multimodality treatment for an acute-on-chronic massive deep vein thrombosis from the inferior vena cava to the pedal vein. A 47-year-old with chief complaints of cold, significant swelling, and severe pain in her left leg was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis through Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The patient received aspiration mechanical thrombectomy with the "kissing catheter" technique, adjunctive stent, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and open surgical thrombectomy by Fogarty catheter without recurrence and complication.

Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on the Endovascular Management of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

PURPOSE

To establish the updated position of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) on the endovascular management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary writing group with expertise in treating venous diseases was convened by SIR. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies on the topic of interest. Recommendations were drafted and graded according to the updated SIR evidence grading system. A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus agreement on the recommendation statements.

RESULTS

A total of 84 studies, including randomized trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, prospective single-arm studies, and retrospective studies were identified and included in the review. The expert writing group developed 17 recommendations that pertain to the care of patients with acute iliofemoral DVT with the use of endovascular venous interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

SIR considers endovascular thrombus removal to be an acceptable treatment option in selected patients with acute iliofemoral DVT. Careful individualized risk assessment, high-quality general DVT care, and close monitoring during and after procedures should be provided.

Exploration of risk factors for hemoglobinuria and acute kidney injury following iliofemoral venous mechanical thrombectomy

Objective

To evaluate the risk factors for hemoglobinuria and acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with or without catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT).

Methods

Patients with IFDVT who had MT with the AngioJet catheter (group A), MT plus CDT (group B), or CDT alone (group C) from January 2016 to March 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Hemoglobinuria was monitored throughout the treatment course, and postoperative AKI was assessed by comparing the preoperative (baseline) and postoperative serum creatinine (sCr) levels from the electronic medical records of all patients. AKI was defined as an elevation in the sCr level exceeding 26.5 ​μmol/L within 72 ​h after the operation according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria.

Results

A total of 493 consecutive patients with IFDVT were reviewed, of which 382 (mean age, 56 ​± ​11 years; 41% of them were females; 97 in group A, 128 in group B, and 157 in group C) were finally analyzed. Macroscopic hemoglobinuria was evident in 44.89% of the patients of the MT groups (101/225, 39 in group A, and 62 in group B), with no significant difference between the groups (P ​= ​0.219), but not in the patients in group C. None of the patients developed AKI (mean sCr difference -2.76 ​± ​13.80 ​μmol/L, range ​= ​-80.20 to 20.60 ​μmol/L) within 72 ​h after surgery.

Conclusions

Rheolytic MT is an independent risk factor for hemoglobinuria. A proper aspiration strategy, hydration, and alkalization following thrombectomy are particularly favorable for preventing AKI.

Catheter-Directed Interventions for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) leads to significant morbidity including pain, swelling, and difficulty walking in the affected limb. If left untreated, DVT increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and post thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The objective of this review was to identify catheter-directed interventions and their success rates for the treatment of lower extremity DVT. A comprehensive search of current and emerging catheter-directed interventions for lower extremity DVT treatment was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. Clinical trials, retrospective and prospective observational studies, and case reports were identified to classify percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and pharmacomechanical CDT (PCDT) devices based on their mechanism of action and indication of use. Catheter-directed interventions such as PMT, CDT, and PCDT offer an alternative therapeutic strategy for DVT management, particularly in patients with limb-threatening conditions and absolute contraindications to anticoagulants. Currently, there are limited guidelines for the use of mechanical and pharmacomechanical devices because of the lack of clinical evidence available for their use in treatment. Future studies are required to determine the short and long-term effects of using catheter-directed interventions as well as their effectiveness in treating acute versus subacute and chronic DVT.

A unique case of hypoplastic inferior vena cava leading to bilateral iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction and review of literature

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cardiovascular disease associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality whereas it induces substantial health care costs and increased use of resources. The current standard of treatment for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is anticoagulation, although revascularization can be considered in younger patients with severe symptoms and extensive thrombus burden to prevent long-term sequalae of VTE (eg, recurrent DVTs, post-thrombotic syndrome post-pulmonary embolism syndrome, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension). A rare cause of VTE is anomalous development of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and can challenge endovascular revascularization. This case report describes a case of hypoplastic supra hepatic IVC, associated with distal IVC occlusion and bilateral lower extremity DVTs treated successfully with suction thrombectomy and on table only thrombolysis, avoiding the higher risk for major bleeding, intensive care unit admission and prolonged hospitalization associated with prolonged tissue plasminogen activator infusion.

Current trends in image-guided chest interventions

Interventional radiology (IR) is a rapidly expanding medical subspecialty and refers to a range of image‐guided procedural techniques. The image guidance allows real‐time visualization and precision placement of a needle, catheter, wire and device to deep body structures through small incisions. Advantages include reduced risks, faster recovery and shorter hospital stays, lower costs and less patient discomfort. The range of chest interventional procedures keeps on expanding due to improved imaging facilities, better percutaneous assess devices and advancing ablation and embolization techniques. These advances permit procedures to be undertaken safely, simultaneously and effectively, hence escalating the role of IR in the treatment of chest disorders. This review article aims to cover the latest developments in some image‐guided techniques of the chest, including thermal ablation therapy of lung malignancy, targeted therapy of pulmonary embolism, angioplasty and stenting of mediastinal venous/superior vena cava occlusion, pulmonary arteriovenous malformation treatment and bronchial artery embolization for haemoptysis.

Clinical outcomes of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy in the treatment of May-Thurner syndrome-related deep venous thrombosis

Objective

May–Thurner syndrome (MTS) is an anatomic stenotic variation associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left leg. The classical DVT treatment strategy is medical treatment without thrombus removal. This study was performed to assess the clinical outcomes of the combination of AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy and stenting for treatment of MTS-related DVT.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for MTS-related DVT from January 2017 to June 2020 at a single institution.

Results

Fourteen patients (nine women) underwent AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy for MTS-related DVT during the study period. The median DVT onset time was 8 days (interquartile range (IQR), 3–21 days). The median procedure time was 130 minutes (IQR, 91–189 minutes), and the median hospital stay was 7 days (IQR, 5–26 days). One patient had a residual thrombus and occluded iliac stent and underwent adjuvant catheter-directed thrombolysis for revascularization. The primary patency rate for the iliac stent was 92.9% at 12 months.

Conclusion

Concomitant AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy and stenting of MTS-induced lesions may be beneficial for patients with MTS-related DVT.

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Involving the Inferior Vena Cava: Interventional Perspectives

Extension of an iliofemoral thrombosis into the inferior vena cava (IVC), or from the IVC descending into the iliofemoral segments, can confer significant morbidity and mortality. Interventional management of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been controversial, but there is little doubt that certain subpopulations benefit, such as those with symptomatic IVC thrombosis. When considering an intervention, caval involvement introduces technical difficulties due to its larger diameter, high thrombus burden, bilateral limb clot extension and need for dual access. The frequent coexistence of an IVC filter increases the complexity even more. This review summarises the current indications and treatment modalities available for the management of acute DVT involving the vena cava.

Endovascular Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in the Oncologic Patient Population

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Venous thromboembolic disease causes significant mortality and morbidity in the oncologic patient population. Recently, minimally invasive endovascular technologies have been developed as an adjunct to antithrombotic therapy for the management of DVT and PE. The current and potential roles for endovascular treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be reviewed in this article.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent NCCN guidelines recommend endovascular therapy in patients eligible for therapeutic anticoagulation who present with life-, organ-, or limb-threatening thrombosis. However, symptomatic non-life-threatening VTE can negatively affect QOL and physical function, both of which have prognostic implications in the cancer population. Endovascular therapies have been shown to improve physical function and QOL in prospective trials performed in a non-oncologic patient population as well as small retrospective studies in the cancer population. In addition to treating life- and limb-threatening thrombosis, endovascular therapy for VTE can improve QOL and physical function in comparison to anticoagulation alone. Prospective trials are warranted to assess the benefit of endovascular therapy for quality of life-years, performance status, and overall survival in the oncologic patient population.

Invasive and Pharmacological Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Scoping Review

The annual occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is 300,000-600,000 cases in the United States and 700,000 in Europe. VTE includes deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of upper or lower extremities, superior and inferior vena cava thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism (PE) as well. The primary treatment of DVT includes oral anticoagulation to prevent the progression of the thrombus and decrease the risk of pulmonary embolism. Depending on the symptoms, more invasive treatments can be applied to target the iliofemoral thrombus and its removal. However, less emphasis is given to acute symptomatology, early recovery of function, quality of life improvement, and the individualized likelihood of developing post-thrombotic syndrome. While invasive therapy has been used to enhance the acute management of iliofemoral DVT, our knowledge about the overall outcomes associated with the invasive treatment of VTE is still limited. In this review, we illustrate the available data on pharmacological and endovascular management of iliofemoral VTE, including therapies such as catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), and pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT).

Learning curve for percutaneous thrombectomy in treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effect of the learning curve on percutaneous thrombectomy (PT) outcomes for the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

The present study was conducted between October 2019 and September 2020 and included 80 patients who had undergone PT to treat lower extremity DVT of the common iliac, external iliac, common femoral, femoral, and popliteal veins. For thrombectomy, aspiration and mechanical thrombectomy procedures were performed until the thrombus had completely dissolved using the Dovi aspiration system and Mantis mechanical thrombectomy system (Invamed, Ankara, Turkey). A total of 80 patients were divided equally into four groups, with the first 20 cases in group 1, the second 20 cases in group 2, the third 20 cases in group 3, and the final 20 cases in group 4. The groups were compared for the demographic characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, complication rates, and procedure success.

RESULTS

All demographic parameters were similar between the four groups. The mean operative time was 139.3 minutes for group 1, 134.8 minutes for group 2, 111.3 minutes for group 3, and 106.7 minutes for group 4. Statistical analysis revealed that the operative time was significantly shorter for groups 3 and 4 compared with that for groups 1 and 2. In addition, the fluoroscopy time was significantly decreased in groups 3 and 4 (P = .001). The complication rate was similar between the four groups (P = .899). However, success was significantly increased after the first 20 cases, and the remaining three groups had a significantly higher success rate compared with group 1 (70% for group 1, 90% for group 2, 95% for group 3, and 100% for group 4; P = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

Success in the performance of PT for the treatment of acute lower extremity DVT reaches satisfactory levels after 20 cases. Additionally, operation time and fluoroscopy time are significantly decreased after 40 cases and then start plateau.

Technical Success and Short-Term Results From Mechanical Thrombectomy for Lower Extremity Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis Using a Computer aided Mechanical Aspiration Thrombectomy Device

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of deep vein thrombosis include severe pain and swelling, and complications can include post-thrombotic syndrome or recurrent venous thromboembolism. Aspiration thrombectomy (AT) treats arterial and venous disease by removing acute thrombus without reliance on thrombolytics, but also has the potential to remove fresh blood. Intelligent aspiration is designed to minimize blood loss during AT by aspirating continuously while in thrombus but only intermittently when in a patent vascular segment with active flow. The Indigo System with Lightning 12 intelligent aspiration (Penumbra, Inc. Alameda, California) utilizes an automatic valve controlled by a proprietary computer algorithm to optimize thrombus removal and minimize blood loss. This Computer aided Mechanical Aspiration Thrombectomy (CMAT) system was used on 16 consecutive patients and initial results are discussed here.

METHODS

This retrospective review included patients undergoing CMAT for iliofemoral acute DVT between July 2020 and June 2021. The primary outcome was greater than 70% thrombus removal as determined by multiplanar venography. Secondary outcomes included single session therapy, blood loss during aspiration, the need for post-procedure blood transfusion, thrombolytic use, symptom resolution prior to discharge, and periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (mean age 58.6 years [range 31-80], 75.0% women) underwent CMAT using Lightning 12. All patients presented with pain and swelling from 2-16 days in duration. There were no cases of phlegmasia. Access was obtained via the popliteal (11), posterior tibial (3), small saphenous (1) or soleal (1) vein. Thrombus reduction of >70% or better was achieved in 100% (16/16) of patients. Single session therapy was successful in 93.8% (15/16) of patients. Eight patients (50%) received stents. All patients achieved symptom resolution prior to discharge. Median blood loss was 155.0 ml (Interquartile range [IQR] 95.0, 187.5), and no patients received post-procedure transfusion. One patient received angioplasty post-thrombectomy, and adjunctive tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was used in 6.2% (1/16) patients. No patients developed postoperative acute kidney failure. There were no periprocedural complications. At 1 to 8-month follow-up, 93.8% (15/16) patients had patency of the treated iliofemoral area and 87.5% (14/16) had no recurrent symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that CMAT using Lightning 12 is safe for clot removal in patients with acute iliofemoral DVT with a high rate of single-session technical success and symptom resolution. In this case series, Lightning 12 was also associated with low blood loss, and no patients required blood transfusion.

Comparison of Aspiration Thrombectomy to other endovascular therapies for Proximal Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) provides an effective method for clearing deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Unfortunately, CDT is associated with hemorrhagic complications. This study evaluated the technical success of the various endovascular therapies including a new mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (AT) device for the treatment of acute upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of patients with acute symptomatic proximal UEDVT secondary to venous thoracic outlet syndrome. Undergoing endovascular therapy from December 2013 to June 2019. Patients were treated with a variety of methods including CDT, ultrasound assisted thrombolysis (USAT), rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) and aspiration thrombectomy (AT). We evaluated outcomes for patients undergoing AT compared to non-aspiration thrombectomy (NAT) techniques. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as resolution of >70% of thrombus. The secondary endpoint was the ability to complete the therapy in a single session.

RESULTS

There were 22 patients who had endovascular management of their symptomatic proximal UEDVT. All 22 (100%) patients were successfully treated with greater than 70% thrombus resolution. 10 patients underwent AT, of which 50% (5/10) had single session therapies. 12 patients underwent NAT (3 had CDT or USAT alone; 3 had USAT with RT; and 6 had CDT followed by RT), with single session therapy occurring in only 8.3% (1/12) of the NAT group. The average total dose of thrombolytics was 12.6mg (SD= 9.65) in the AT group compared to 19.0mg (SD= 5.78) in the NAT group (mean difference -6.4; 95% CI -1.1, 13.9). All but one of the patients in the AT group went on to have successful first rib resections. All NAT patients had successful first rib resections. Venogram was not performed at the time of decompression. All patients except one underwent resection via the infraclavicular approach, with rib removal posterior to the brachial plexus, a median of 8.0 [IQR 6.0, 12.0] days following DVT therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, technical success of 100% was achieved for acute symptomatic proximal UEDVT therapies. AT technology allows for higher rates of treatment in a single session thereby minimizing a patient's risks of bleeding complications. Further research is needed to further define the role of this new technology in the treatment paradigm of UEDVT management.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical intervention in deep venous thrombosis: what is the status after the ATTRACT trial?

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a major cause of acute and chronic morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Endovascular methods for thrombus removal and reestablishing venous patency are increasing in both scope and usage. The most commonly used method for endovascular thrombectomy is catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Several studies have shown promise for CDT in alleviating acute symptomatology in acute lower extremity DVT as well as mitigating potential long-term consequences of DVT, such as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial is the largest and most comprehensive randomized-controlled trial to date evaluating CDT compared to anticoagulation alone for the treatment of acute symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT. This review discusses the current status of CDT and adjunctive endovascular interventions for DVT, particularly in the context of the ATTRACT trial.

The role of ultrasound imaging in vascular compression syndromes

Vascular compression syndromes are rare alterations that have in common the compression of an arterial and/or venous vessel by contiguous structures and can be congenital or acquired. The best known are the Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, Nutcracker Syndrome, May–Thurner Syndrome, and Dunbar Syndrome. The incidence of these pathologies is certainly underestimated due to the non-specific clinical signs and their frequent asymptomaticity. Being a first-level method, Ultrasound plays a very important role in identifying these alterations, almost always allowing a complete diagnostic classification. If in expert hands, this method can significantly contribute to the reduction of false negatives, especially in the asymptomatic population, where the finding of the aforementioned pathologies often happens randomly following routine checks. In this review, we briefly discuss the best known vascular changes, the corresponding ultrasound anatomy, and typical ultrasound patterns.

The Protégé Nitinol Self-Expanding Stent for the Treatment of Iliofemoral Veno-Occlusive Disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Protégé nitinol self-expanding stent for the treatment of iliofemoral veno-occlusive disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 376 (284 left, 92 right) Protégé stents in 212 limbs of 183 patients (mean age: 53 ± 17 years, 52% female) treated for iliofemoral veno-occlusive disease between 2011 and 2018. Binary patency was assessed with duplex ultrasound and calculated by Kaplan Meier analysis. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology (CEAP) classification and Villalta scores. Adverse events were recorded and categorized per Society of Interventional Radiology reporting standards.

RESULTS

Of the 212 limbs, 125 presented with acute thrombosis and 28 with chronic thrombosis requiring thrombectomy (n = 44), catheter directed thrombolysis (n = 32), or both (n = 77). Fifty-nine limbs were non-thrombotic. Mean follow-up time was 11.44 ± 11.37 months. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed a primary limb-level patency of 92.3%, 88.6%, 86.9% and 86.9% at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. CEAP and Villalta scores improved from a median of C3 (range: 0-6) to C1 (0-5) (p < 0.001) and from a mean of 13.4 ± 7.5 to 5.3 ± 4.9 (p < 0.001), respectively. Nine minor and 2 major adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of iliofemoral veno-occlusive disease with the Protégé self-expanding stent appears to have good mid-term patency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, Case Series.

The efficacy of rotational pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: Is the standard treatment of deep vein thrombosis changing?

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency of rotational thrombectomy device in pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis for symptomatic acute ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 2013 and May 2018,82 patients with acute deep vein thrombosis comprising the iliofemoral segment whom underwent Pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis were evaluated retrospectively. The Cleaner thrombectomy device was used. The resolution of thrombi was examined and graded. Development of post-thrombotic syndrome was assessed with Villalta scores.

RESULTS

75 patients (91.4%) had complete thrombus resolution. Between 50-99% resolution was noted in 6 patients (7.4%) and in one (1.2%) case less than %50 thrombus resolution was obtained. Seventy-five patients (91%) of the cohort could be treated in a single session; 7 patients (8.6%) required reintervention(s). Although improved post-thrombotic syndrome rates were lower at the short term, Villalta scores gradually increased during follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, Pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis with Cleaner thrombectomy device is a safe and beneficial method for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Long term follow up data of large volume multicenter studies are warranted.

Management of inferior vena cava thrombosis with the FlowTriever and ClotTriever systems

OBJECTIVE

Although inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis is infrequently encountered, it carries a significant risk of post-thrombotic syndrome and pulmonary embolus. Recent studies show no difference in the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated with pharmacothrombolysis vs anticoagulation alone; however, there is an associated increased risk of bleeding. The treatment of IVC thrombosis is less well-studied and the hemodynamic changes may be more significant with pharmacothrombolysis, although the bleeding risk remains. The ClotTriever and FlowTriever systems remove thrombus from veins without the use of thrombolytics. Our study evaluates outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of IVC thrombosis using the ClotTriever and FlowTriever devices.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of IVC thrombosis using the ClotTriever and/or FlowTriever systems from November 2018 to January 2020 at four data-sharing institutions. The decision of which device(s) to use was at the discretion of the surgeon. Patient demographics, symptomatology, and imaging characteristics were captured at presentation and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients met the inclusion criteria; 10 were male, and the average age was 59 years. The majority of patients were symptomatic at presentation (n = 14), had a prior history of DVT (n = 13), and had a preexisting IVC filter (n = 8). Eleven patients presented with acute onset (<1 week) of symptoms, whereas three patients had subacute (1-4 weeks) symptoms. Most patients had an associated iliofemoral DVT (n = 13) and were treated with both ClotTriever and FlowTriever (n = 8); others were treated with either ClotTriever or FlowTriever alone (n = 5 and n = 2, respectively). Technical success was achieved in all but two patients, one who had a nonocclusive thrombus densely adherent to a preexisting IVC filter and another who had a chronic rubbery clot in the IVC that could not be cleared. No patient required concomitant lytic therapy or a postoperative stay in the intensive care unit. Furthermore, there were no postoperative bleeding events, myocardial infarctions, pulmonary emboli, renal impairments, or deaths. The median length of stay was 3 days (range, 1-37 days). Patients underwent postoperative follow-up (n = 7) as well as extended follow-up (>6 months; n = 8). All patients who achieved technical success were asymptomatic without evidence of reocclusion of the IVC on follow-up imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

In our multicenter series of 15 patients, The ClotTriever and FlowTriever showed promise in the treatment of IVC thrombosis without the use of fibrinolytic drugs, with no bleeding events and no requirement for intensive care unit stay.

Catheter Interventions for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis: Who, When and How

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is common and can be a source of morbidity by way of pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome. Recent trials have demonstrated both early and late symptomatic benefit in venous thrombolysis and early recanalisation of the iliocaval system of selected patients. Based on the emerging evidence, national societies have published guidelines that recommend early thrombus removal in iliofemoral DVT in patients with low bleeding risk and good life expectancy. In light of these recommendations, endovenous thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy have become more popular among vein specialists. As more venous technology becomes available, surgeons and interventionalists should take pause and ensure their patient selection and treatment algorithms parallel that of existing and emerging evidence. This article summarises current evidence, technology, and the approach used at a high-volume academic centre in treating iliofemoral DVT.

Challenging Management of a Patient With Severe Bilateral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Among patients with proximal iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and an elevated Villalta score, anticoagulation therapy alone may not be a sufficient management strategy in select cases. In this article, we report a case of severe bilateral iliofemoral DVT that resisted the standard treatment for DVT, requiring catheter-directed thrombolysis and subsequent mechanical thrombectomy.

Single-center experience with Indigo aspiration thrombectomy for acute lower limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) is a challenging vascular emergency with notable morbidity. Aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT) devices are an alternative approach to remove thrombus in the peripheral arterial system and to restore limb perfusion, but data are limited. We evaluated the outcomes of AMT for the treatment of ALLI at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients with ALLI treated with Indigo (Penumbra Inc, Alameda, Calif) AMT device from 2014 to 2017. The primary outcome was technical success (restoration of blood flow with <50% residual thrombus without need for catheter-directed thrombolysis [CDT] or open surgery) as main treatment or adjunctive treatment (after failure of another modality). Indications, anatomic segments treated, outcomes, and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 41 patients (68% male, 32% female; mean age, 67 years; range, 27-90 years) who underwent 43 procedures. The cause of ALLI was embolism (18), native vessel thrombosis (13), bypass thrombosis (7), intraluminal thrombus due to pseudoaneurysm (1), stent thrombosis (1), intraprocedural embolization (1), recurrent thrombosis of native vessel (1), and chronic thrombosis (1). AMT was the main treatment in 29 cases and adjunctive in 14. Technical success was 52% (15/29) as main treatment and 50% (7/14) as adjunctive treatment. Thrombolysis was avoided in 53% of patients (23/43). There were six thrombotic recurrences, one after successful isolated AMT. The other five required multiple modalities after AMT failure. There were no 30-day deaths. Five patients required amputations, but only one after successful AMT. Complications included intraoperative distal embolization (two), access site hematoma (one), pseudoaneurysm (one), acute kidney injury (one), and spontaneous calf hematoma (one). There were no blood transfusions required or severe bleeding complications.

CONCLUSIONS

With an overall success rate of 51% in selected patients, the Indigo AMT device avoided the need for CDT or open surgery in about half of patients with ALLI. The device has a favorable safety profile, particularly in high-risk cases. Given its moderate effectiveness, the role of Indigo AMT in the management of ALLI will further be defined by the description of optimal technique, the determination of treatment indications, and a direct comparison with CDT.