Five-year extension study of patients from a randomized clinical trial (VeClose) comparing cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins

Real-World Safety and Efficiency of Treating Symptomatic Varicose Veins with Endovenous Closure of Great, Small, and Anterior Accessory Veins Using Cyanoacrylate Glue (VenaSeal™): A Single-surgeon Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of symptomatic varicose veins has changed dramatically in the last few years with guidelines now recommending endovenous surgery as first-line intervention. Previously, this was achieved by laser or radiofrequency ablation of the target vein, requiring infiltration of tumescent anesthesia to reduce the risks of thermal damage to surrounding tissue. Endovenous cyanoacrylate injection (VenaSeal™) is a nonthermal, nontumescent endovenous closure technique, increasing patient comfort and is readily performed under local anesthesia only and thus is a feasible technique for in-room treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the 16 month closure rates and safety of the VenaSeal system for the treatment of lower limb varicose vein surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-surgeon, multicenter study reporting outcomes for the treatment of varicose veins using endovenous closure with cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) using the VenaSeal system. Varicose tributary treatment was performed with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. Patients were followed up with duplex ultrasound within 72 hours, 4 months, and 16 months. The primary outcome of the study was the successful closure of the target vein. Secondary outcomes were complications including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding, admission, and mortality.

RESULTS

Briefly, 804 incompetent saphenous veins in 480 patients (712 legs) underwent CAC between December 2018 and August 2022. The sonographic closure rate was 99.6% (791/794) at first follow-up, 99.3% (731/736) at second follow-up, and 97.2% (520/535) at third follow-up. Secondary outcomes across all follow-ups included 0 clinically symptomatic or occlusive DVTs, or endovenous glue-induced thrombosis. Incidentally, there were 30 nonocclusive below-knee DVTs related to foam sclerotherapy, and 8 glue thrombus extension, all of which were successfully treated with anticoagulation and resolved by 3 months. There were no occlusive or above knee DVTs, related PEs, bleeding events, deaths, or complications requiring admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world study illustrates that CAC is an effective and safe method for treating saphenous incompetence.

Medical Devices in the Region of Tuscany, Italy: Definitions of Innovative Devices and Potentially Innovative Devices and Their Impact on Procurement Decisions

In the region of Tuscany in Italy, since 2019, medical devices belonging to risk classes 2b, 3, or active implantable have been managed by a multidisciplinary health-technology assessment body initially composed of eight members and extended to 23 members in 2022, thus creating the Centro Operativo. In 2021, an original algorithm for the identification of innovative devices based on objective criteria was developed and formally recognized over the following years. However, since these criteria identified only a small number of innovative devices, we tried to develop another algorithm aimed at identifying a new classification (called "potentially innovative device"), which was intended to be intermediate between full innovation and no innovation. Since preliminary analyses showed that objective criteria were not able to identify this intermediate classification, we relied on the expert opinion of the Centro Operativo for this purpose. In this article, we analyzed all the devices requested by Centro Operativo in the first half of 2024 for a total of 17 devices. Only one met the criteria of innovation and, therefore, was purchased; the other 11 were evaluated as adequate to be purchased based on clinical and/or economic reasons, whereas the remaining six did not. To create an operational relationship between these decisions and the definitions of innovativeness, the Centro Operativo explored a simple model wherein the 11 devices that failed to meet full innovativeness but were judged adequate to be purchased were classified as potentially innovative. In comparison, the remaining six devices were considered not innovative. On the one hand, we report the results of this preliminary experience; on the other hand, we plan to implement this form of management of high-technology devices into a regional regulation that will be applied for the next months in all hospitals of our region.

Mechanochemical chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins for venous insufficiency: American vein and lymphatic society position statement

Background: Mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation (MOCA) of incompetent saphenous veins has been utilized since its FDA approval in 2008. However, only recently have longer-term three and 5 year clinical follow up data become available. This updated information necessitates a societal update to guide treatment and ensure optimal patient outcomes. Method: The American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an expert panel to write a Position Statement with explanations and recommendations for the appropriate use of MOCA for patients with venous insufficiency. Result: This Position Statement was produced by the expert panel with recommendations for appropriate use, treatment technique, outcomes review, and potential adverse events. These recommendations were reviewed, edited, and approved by the Guidelines Committee of the Society. Conclusions: MOCA is effective in alleviating symptoms and a safe treatment option for venous insufficiency. It obviates the need for tumescent anesthesia, has less procedural discomfort and lower risk of thermal nerve or skin injury. It may be used in both the below knee distal GSV as well as the SSV. However, it is associated with significantly lower rates of vessel closure and higher recanalization rates compared to both RFA and EVLA and is less cost effective than thermal techniques. It is an available option for those in whom thermal ablation is not suitable.

Mid-term results of cyanoacrylate closure for the treatment of incompetent great and small saphenous veins: Findings from a Japanese prospective consecutive multi-center registry: Mid-term results of cyanoacrylate closure

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) for endovascular treatment of varicose veins with cyanoacrylate adhesive (VenaSeal® closure system) in Japan.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective consecutive registry study was conducted at 12 centers in Japan on 125 patients with primary varicose veins who underwent CAC. The patients were evaluated on target vein occlusion, postoperative complications, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), and EuroQol 5 dimensions 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) for 1-year after the surgery.

RESULTS

The closure rate was 92.6% at 1 year postoperatively, and 95.0% and 90.2% for GSV and SSV respectively with little difference (p = .491). The mean VAS in the immediate postoperative period was 18.9 ± 23.4. Postoperative complications were observed in 20 patients (16%). Hypersensitivity-type phlebitis occurred in 7 patients (5.6%). Infection of the treated vein resulted in resection of GSV. The rVCSS and AVVQ improved significantly after 90 days and 1 year postoperatively (p < .001), while the EQ-5D-5L have not changed.

CONCLUSION

Cyanoacrylate Closure was considered generally a safe and minimally invasive treatment with good mid-term outcomes including SSV. However further study is required for some CAC specific complications.

The anterior saphenous vein. Part 3. Systematic review of the literature and payor coverage policies. Endorsed by the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum and the International Union of Phlebology

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to systemically review the literature on Anterior Saphenous Vein (ASV) reflux treatment and insurance impediments to treatment coverage.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using a PRISMA framework. In addition, a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for ASV treatment was evaluated.

RESULTS

Published evidence and treatment considerations in the literature for ASV treatment are discussed. In 155 of 226 (68.6%) insurance policies reviewed coverage of ASV ablation was allowed while 62/226 (27.4%) did not specify coverage and 9/226 (4.0%) specified ASV treatment was not covered. Of the 155 that provide ASV coverage, 98 (62.2%) provide coverage with criteria such as requiring prior treatment of the great saphenous vein.

CONCLUSIONS

Vein treatment experts should continue to advocate to insurance carriers to update their varicose vein treatment policies to reflect the substantial clinical evidence so that patients with ASV reflux can be appropriately treated.

The anterior saphenous vein. Part 3. Systematic review of the literature and payor coverage policies. Endorsed by the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum, and the International Union of Phlebology

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to systemically review the literature on Anterior Saphenous Vein (ASV) reflux treatment and insurance impediments to treatment coverage.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using a PRISMA framework. In addition, a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for ASV treatment was evaluated.

RESULTS

Published evidence and treatment considerations in the literature for ASV treatment are discussed. In 155 of 226 (68.6%) insurance policies reviewed coverage of ASV ablation was allowed while 62/226 (27.4%) did not specify coverage and 9/226 (4.0%) specified ASV treatment was not covered. Of the 155 that provide ASV coverage, 98 (62.2%) provide coverage with criteria such as requiring prior treatment of the great saphenous vein.

CONCLUSIONS

Vein treatment experts should continue to advocate to insurance carriers to update their varicose vein treatment policies to reflect the substantial clinical evidence so that patients with ASV reflux can be appropriately treated.

Mechanochemical ablation: disappointing long-term anatomic results and worsening symptoms

An updated report on the five-year results in the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence with mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) provides additional evidence for higher rates of anatomic recanalization compared to other treatment modalities and progressive worsening of symptoms with time.

Current practice of cyanoacrylate endovenous ablation: American vein and lymphatic society position statement

BACKGROUND

Cyanoacrylate endovenous ablation and closure of incompetent saphenous veins have become increasingly utilized since its approval for use in the United States in 2015. This increase in usage necessitates a societal update to guide treatment and ensure optimal and consistent patient outcomes.

METHOD

The American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an expert panel to write an updated Position Statement with explanations and recommendations for the appropriate use of cyanoacrylate endovenous ablation for patients with venous insufficiency.

RESULT

A Position Statement was produced by the expert panel with recommendations for appropriate use, treatment technique, outcomes review, and potential adverse events. Their recommendations were reviewed, edited, and approved by the Guidelines Committee of the Society.

CONCLUSION

This societal Position Statement provides a useful document for reference for physicians and venous specialists to assist in the appropriate use of cyanoacrylate endovenous ablation in the treatment of patients with venous insufficiency.

3-year clinical outcomes of A Singapore VenaSeal™ real world post-market evaluation Study (ASVS) for varicose vein ablation

INTRODUCTION

Medium-term clinical outcome data are lacking for cyanoacrylate glue (CAG) ablation for symptomatic varicose veins, especially from the Asian population.

OBJECTIVES

Aim was to determine the 3-year symptomatic relief gained from using the VenaSeal™ device to close refluxing truncal veins from the Singaporean ASVS prospective registry.

METHODS

The revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and three quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were completed to assess clinical improvement in venous disease symptoms along with a dedicated patient satisfaction survey. 70 patients (107 limbs; 40 females; mean age of 60.9 ± 13.6 years) were included at 3 years.

RESULTS

At 3 years, rVCSS showed sustained improvement from baseline (5.00 to 0.00; p < 0.001) and 51/70 (72.9%) had improvement by at least 2 or more CEAP categories. Freedom from reintervention was 90% and 85.7% patients were extremely satisfied with the treatment outcome. No further reports of further hypersensitivity reactions after one year.

CONCLUSION

The 3-year follow-up results of the ASVS registry demonstrated continued and sustained clinical efficacy with few reinterventions following CAG embolization in Asian patients with chronic venous insufficiency.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03893201.

Ethical Considerations and Adverse Events in Cyanoacrylate Embolization for Non-Saphenous Veins: A Case Report

The cyanoacrylate embolization (CAE) technique for chronic venous disease treatment is less painful and leads to a faster recovery than conventional endovenous thermal treatment. According to the instructions for use (IFU) of the VenaSeal closure system (Medtronic), a representative CAE product, it has only been approved for treating saphenous veins, not non-saphenous veins. Here, we report a case of ignoring the VenaSeal IFU for treating testicular pain using CAE for non-saphenous veins within the abdominal wall, which is a baseless and non-scientific approach nearing malpractice. Hence, it is imperative for physicians to rigorously adhere to the IFU and abstain from experimenting with new treatment methods solely based on personal experience.

899 serious adverse events including 13 deaths, 7 strokes, 211 thromboembolic events, and 482 immune reactions: The untold story of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to retrieve and analyse the serious adverse events of venous occlusion systems used in cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC) submitted to regulatory agencies.

METHODS

The Total Product Life Cycle (TPLC) database of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) of the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), and the Yellow Card database of the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) were reviewed. Three Freedom of Information (FOI) requests had to be submitted to the MHRA to obtain data.

RESULTS

The TPLC contained 899 reports which included 13 cases of death, 7 strokes, 211 thromboembolic events, and 482 immune reactions. The DAEN recorded three reportable adverse events, and the MHRA recorded seven adverse incidents including one death.

CONCLUSION

CAC is associated with serious adverse events including death. These events are under-reported in the medical literature and only sub-optimally reported to the regulatory agencies.

Comparison of cyanoacrylate closure and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small saphenous veins

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the early and mid-term results of radiofrequency ablation and cyanoacrylate ablation used in the treatment of small saphenous insufficiency.

METHODS

A total of 84 patients with isolated small saphenous vein insufficiency who underwent either cyanoacrylate ablation (CA) (Group 1, n = 40) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (Group 2, n = 44) were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The occlusion rate of target vessel was 95% in Group 1 and 93.1% in Group 2 patients, respectively, at 1-year follow-up without any significant difference. Sural nerve injury was observed in 3 (6.8%) patients in Group 2 due to the thermal damage of the RFA device.

CONCLUSIONS

While both techniques can be used with satisfactory and safe results in 1-year follow-up period, cyanoacrylate ablation may have a better safety profile compared to radiofrequency ablation due to lower complication rates in terms of paresthesia and sural nerve damage with similar occlusion rates.

Cyanoacrylate closure for arteriovenous fistula in the lower extremity with saphenous vein insufficiency

A lower extremity arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is sometimes associated with venous disease following venous hypertension, especially when the saphenous vein is the main return route. This can cause venous dilation, leading to valve insufficiency. A complete cure can be difficult in cases with multiple vascular branches. We report three surgical cases of lower extremity AVF with saphenous vein insufficiency. All patients had saphenous vein insufficiency with long duration leg symptoms and underwent full-length occlusion of saphenous vein using cyanoacrylate closure. Substantial improvements in leg symptoms and appearance were observed immediately after surgery in all three patients. Cyanoacrylate closure could be a treatment option for lower extremity AVF.

Complex Hypersensitivity and Irritation Reaction (CHAIR) Phenomenon after Cyanoacrylate Closure of Varicose Vein

Cyanoacrylate glue is a non-thermal, non-tumescent agent used to treat saphenous reflux. It was introduced to overcome heat-related discomfort and complications. Multiple randomized controlled trials using this therapy have demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up. However, diffuse injection-site inflammation and systemic urticaria are worrisome complications. In preclinical studies, serial histopathological findings demonstrated acute inflammatory reaction, subacute vasculitis, chronic granulomatous foreign body reaction, fibrotic changes with partial vascular recanalization, and chronic foreign body-type inflammatory response. While the exact nature of this unique complication remains undefined, complex hypersensitivity and irritation reaction phenomena have been suggested based on reported clinical presentations. The incidence of this complication has been reported as ranging from 0.3%-25.4%. Typically, erythematous reactions can occur near treatment sites, with symptoms ranging from mild pruritus and/or erythema that resolves without treatment to recurrent severe inflammation and pruritus requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihistamines, and/or corticosteroids. Surgical excision has been rarely reported in patients with severe intractable inflammation or treatment-site infections. Although several anecdotal studies reported on using antihistaminics or corticosteroids, no effective strategies have been established to prevent this complication.

Natural history and role of anticoagulation in the management of endovenous glue-induced thrombus

OBJECTIVE

The natural history of endovenous glue-induced thrombus (EGIT) resolution and the role of anticoagulation (AC) and/or anti-platelet (AP) agents in their management is currently ill-defined. The goal of this investigation is to determine the clinical behavior of EGITs and whether or not AC or AP affects treatment outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all endovenous ablations utilizing cyanoacrylate glue (CAG) from January 2020 to December 2021 at the Center for Vein Restoration. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) patients who developed an EGIT (EGIT/CAG) and (2) patients treated with CAG and no EGIT development (CAG). Demographics, medical/surgical histories, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS), Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ), CEAP, EGIT category, type of anticoagulation, resolution time, location of any deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were analyzed, catheter tip distance, treatment length and proximal thigh diameters were all analyzed. EGITs were categorized as follows: EGIT 1: thrombus extension into the deep vein covering less than 25% of the luminal area; EGIT 2: thrombus between 25% and 49%; EGIT 3: thrombus between 50% and 74%; and EGIT 4: total occlusion. Our protocol is to perform post-procedure duplex scans within 3 to 7 days after endovenous ablations to assess for post-intervention DVTs.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2374 patients received 4321 CAG procedures. EGITs were observed in 133 patients (3.1%): EGIT 1 (n = 57); EGIT 2 (n = 35); EGIT 3 (n = 19); and EGIT 4 (n = 22). All EGITs were identified by surveillance scanning. No patient presented with limb or pulmonary symptoms suggestive of VTE. The average age, rVCSS, and CIVIQ 20 of the entire cohort was 65.3 ± 14.2 years, 8.2 ± 2.8, and 48 ± 18.3, respectively with 89 females and 44 males. For EGIT 1, 56 of 57 (98%) resolved at 4.2 ± 5.1 weeks, with one patient lost to follow-up. AC/AP regimen included two aspirin (ASA), one Eliquis, 5 Xarelto, and nothing in 49 patients (86%). For EGIT 2, 27 of 35 (77%) resolved at 4.4 ± 3.4 weeks, one was unresolved, six regressed to EGIT 1, and one remained an EGIT 2 at the last follow-up examination. AC/AP regimens included seven ASA, three Eliquis, three Xarelto, one Coumadin, and nothing in 21 patients (60%). For EGIT 3, 12 were in the common femoral vein (CFV), three in the popliteal vein (POPV), one in the external iliac vein, and three in the gastrocnemius veins. Nine of nineteen (47%) resolved at 6 ± 5.9 weeks, four regressed, one migrated to the proximal CFV, three became chronic, and two were lost to follow-up. AC/AP regimens included three ASA, three Eliquis, seven Xarelto, and nothing in six patients (32%). AC/AP compared with no AC/AP had no effect on clot resolution (P = .3). Of the 22 EGIT 4, one was in the CFV, two were in the POPV, and 18 (82%) were remote calf vein DVTs (15 gastrocnemius, one peroneal [PV], and three posterior tibial veins [PTVs]). The CFV EGIT became chronic, one POPV resolved, and one was lost to follow-up. For the gastrocnemius clots, five became chronic, eight resolved, and two were lost to follow-up. For the PTV clots, one resolved, one became chronic, and one was lost to follow-up. The PV clot became chronic. AC/AP regimen included four ASA, five Eliquis, six Xarelto, and nothing in seven patients. AC/AP compared with no AC/AP had no effect on clot resolution (P = .9). The average proximal thigh diameter (millimeters, mm), vein length treated (mm), and catheter distance (mm) from the junction were the following: EGIT 1 (5.9 ± 2.4, 37.5 ± 17.6, and 5.2 ± 1), EGIT 2 (5.9 ± 1.7, 38 ± 16.9, 4.79 ± 0.71), EGIT 3 (5.1 ± 2.6, 27.9 ± 16.6, and 5.26 ± 1.4), and EGIT 4 (5 ± 1.7, 29.9 ± 15.8, and 5.39 ± 2.18), respectively. Treatment length alone was significantly shorter in EGIT 3 and 4, compared with EGIT 1 and 2 (P ≤ .05). Catheter distance from the junction was longer in EGIT 1, 3, and 4 patients compared with CAG patients (P ≤ .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of EGIT class or severity, the majority of EGITs are not associated with clot extension or migration and tend to resolve or regress. For EGIT class 1 and 2 patients, AC or AP therapy is not necessary, as 86% and 60%, respectively, resolved with observation alone by 4 weeks. For EGIT 3, 68% resolved or regressed regardless of AC or AP use. The majority of EGIT 4 were remote calf vein DVTs. EGIT 3 and 4 associated with the saphenofemoral/popliteal junction are rare. When compared with CAG patients, proximal thigh diameters and treatment lengths were larger and longer in EGIT 1 and 2 patients. Catheter proximity to the junction was not associated with a higher incidence of EGIT formation.

Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction after Cyanoacrylate Venous Closure

BACKGROUND

Nonthermal endovenous closure techniques are routinely utilized to treat superficial axial venous reflux. Cyanoacrylate closure is a safe and effective modality implemented for truncal closure. However, an adverse reaction of type IV hypersensitivity (T4H), unique to cyanoacrylate, is a known risk. This study aims to evaluate the real-world incidence of T4H and examine risk factors that may predispose its development.

METHODS

A retrospective review between 2012- and 2022 was performed at four tertiary US institutions to examine patients who underwent cyanoacrylate vein closure of their saphenous veins. Patient demographics, comorbidities, CEAP (Clinical [C], Etiological [E], Anatomical [A], and Pathophysiological [P]) classification, and periprocedural outcomes were included. The primary endpoint was development of T4H post procedure. Logistic regression analysis for risk factors predictive of T4H was performed. Variables with a P-value of <0.05 were deemed significant.

RESULTS

595 patients underwent 881 cyanoacrylate venous closures. Mean age was 66.2 ± 14.9, and 66% of patients were female. There were 92 (10.4%) T4H events in 79 (13%) patients. Oral steroids were administered to 23% for persistent and/or severe symptoms. There were no systemic allergic reactions to cyanoacrylate. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age (P = 0.015), active smoking status (P = 0.033), and CEAP 3 (P < 0.001) and 4 (P = 0.005) classifications as independent risk factors associated with development of T4H.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world multicenter study shows the overall incidence of T4H to be 10%. CEAP 3 and 4 patients of younger age and smokers predicted a higher risk of T4H to cyanoacrylate.

Endovascular Occlusive or Sclerosing Agent Monotherapy for Varicose Veins: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This systematic review and network meta-analysis investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of chemical agent injections in patients with varicose veins. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible studies where patients administered endovascular agents comprised an intervention group, and patients administered other interventions comprised the comparison group. The endovascular agents included foam and liquid form sclerotherapy or cyanoacrylate glue. The other interventions in this study included surgery, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and placebo. A network meta-analysis for treatment effectiveness was performed. In addition, we illustrated the P-score lines of success rate and complication rate sorted by the P-score. Our results showed that at all postprocedural time intervals, cyanoacrylate glue therapy exhibited a significantly higher success rate compared with foam and liquid sclerotherapy. According to the plot of P-score lines, cyanoacrylate glue had an overall tendency of higher success rate and lower complication rate compared with foam and liquid sclerotherapy. Comparing with the other invasive treatments, cyanoacrylate glue may be non-inferior and could be considered as an option for treating varicose veins. However, the clinical benefits and safety of endovascular agents for the treatment of varicose veins require further corroboration through randomized control trials.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Endovenous Glue-Induced Hypersensitivity Among Patients Who Underwent Endovenous Cyanoacrylate Ablation Procedures: A Registry-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of endovenous glue-induced hypersensitivity (EGIH) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical impacts on patients with EGIH after endovenous cyanoacrylate-glue ablation (CA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively designed endovenous CA-specific registry was created, and a total of 335 limbs from 173 patients who underwent endovenous CA were enrolled for a cohort study.

RESULTS

Symptomatic EGIH was observed in 55 (31.8%) patients. Beyond the target vein area, systemic side effects were noted in 5.8% of the treated patients after CA. The median onset time was 13 postoperative days (range: 1-35 days). The median duration was 7 days, but about 10.9% of the affected patients experienced symptoms lasting longer than 4 weeks. In the EGIH and non-EGIH groups, significant improvements in venous clinical severity score and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire-14 scores were observed 3 months postoperatively. The development of EGIH did not affect the postoperative patient-reported satisfaction scores ( p = .524).

CONCLUSION

EGIH is observed in a substantial proportion of patients. The side effects do not affect the clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures. Further studies are required on the detailed pathogenesis and definition of EGIH.

Endovenous ablation for venous leg ulcers

BACKGROUND

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a serious manifestation of chronic venous disease affecting up to 3% of the adult population. This typically recalcitrant and recurring condition significantly impairs quality of life, and its treatment places a heavy financial burden upon healthcare systems. The longstanding mainstay treatment for VLUs is compression therapy. Surgical removal of incompetent veins reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence. However, open surgery is an unpopular option amongst people with VLU, and many people are unsuitable for it. The efficacy of the newer, minimally-invasive endovenous techniques has been established in uncomplicated superficial venous disease, and these techniques can also be used in the management of VLU. When used with compression, endovenous ablation aims to further reduce pressure in the veins of the leg, which may impact ulcer healing.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of superficial endovenous ablation on the healing and recurrence of venous leg ulcers and the quality of life of people with venous ulcer disease.

SEARCH METHODS

In April 2022 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scrutinised reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions on the language of publication, but there was a restriction on publication year from 1998 to April 2022 as superficial endovenous ablation is a comparatively new technology.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing endovenous ablative techniques with compression versus compression therapy alone for the treatment of VLU were eligible for inclusion. Studies needed to have assessed at least one of the following primary review outcomes related to objective measures of ulcer healing such as: proportion of ulcers healed at a given time point; time to complete healing; change in ulcer size; proportion of ulcers recurring over a given time period or at a specific point; or ulcer-free days. Secondary outcomes of interest were patient-reported quality of life, economic data and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data, carried out risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool, and assessed GRADE certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

The previous version of this review found no RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria. In this update, we identified two eligible RCTs and included them in a meta-analysis. There was a total of 506 participants with an active VLU, with mean durations of 3.1 months ± 1.1 months in the EVRA trial and 60.5 months ± 96.4 months in the VUERT trial. Both trials randomised participants to endovenous treatment and compression or compression alone, however the compression alone group in the EVRA trial received deferred endovenous treatment (after ulcer healing or from six months). There is high-certainty evidence that combined endovenous ablation and compression compared with compression therapy alone, or compression with deferred endovenous treatment, improves time to complete ulcer healing (pooled hazard ratio (HR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.47; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 466 participants). There is moderate-certainty evidence that the proportion of ulcers healed at 90 days is probably higher with combined endovenous ablation and compression compared with compression therapy alone or compression with deferred endovenous treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.14, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.30; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 466 participants). There is low-certainty evidence showing an unclear effect on ulcer recurrence at one year in people with healed ulcers with combined endovenous treatment and compression when compared with compression alone or compression with deferred endovenous treatment (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.48; I2 = 78%; 2 studies, 460 participants). There is also low-certainty evidence that the median number of ulcer-free days at one year may not differ (306 (interquartile range (IQR) 240 to 328) days versus 278 (IQR 175 to 324) days) following combined endovenous treatment and compression when compared with compression and deferred endovenous treatment; (1 study, 450 participants). There is low-certainty evidence of an unclear effect in rates of thromboembolism between groups (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.51 to 7.97; I2 = 78%, 2 studies, 506 participants). The addition of endovenous ablation to compression is probably cost-effective at one year (99% probability at GBP 20,000/QALY; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Endovenous ablation of superficial venous incompetence in combination with compression improves leg ulcer healing when compared with compression alone. This conclusion is based on high-certainty evidence. There is moderate-certainty evidence to suggest that it is probably cost-effective at one year and low certainty evidence of unclear effects on recurrence and complications. Further research is needed to explore the additional benefit of endovenous ablation in ulcers of greater than six months duration and the optimal modality of endovenous ablation.

Cyanoacrylate glue reactions: A systematic review, cases, and proposed mechanisms

OBJECTIVE

Cyanoacrylate glue closure was first used in humans 10 years ago to treat venous reflux of the axial veins. Studies have since shown its clinical efficacy in vein closure. However, great need exists to elucidate further the types of specific adverse reactions that cyanoacrylate glue can cause for better patient selection and to minimize these events. In the present study, we systematically reviewed the literature to identify the types of reported reactions. In addition, we explored the pathophysiology contributing to these reactions and proposed the mechanistic pathway with inclusion of actual cases.

METHODS

We searched the literature for reports of reactions following cyanoacrylate glue use in patients with venous diseases between 2012 and 2022. The search was performed using MeSH (medical subject headings) terms. The terms included cyanoacrylate, venous insufficiency, chronic venous disorder, varicose veins, vein varicosities, venous ulcer, venous wound, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic), vein, adverse events, phlebitis, hypersensitivity, foreign body granuloma, giant cell, endovenous glue-induced thrombosis, and allergy. The search was limited to the literature reported in English. These studies were evaluated for the type of product used and the reactions noted. A systematic review, in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method, was performed. Covidence software (Melbourne, VC, Australia) was used for full-text screening and data extraction. Two reviewers reviewed the data, and the content expert served as the tiebreaker.

RESULTS

We identified 102, of which, 37 reported on cyanoacrylate use other than in the context of chronic venous diseases and were excluded. Fifty-five reports were determined appropriate for data extraction. The adverse reactions to cyanoacrylate glue were phlebitis, hypersensitivity, foreign body granuloma, and endovenous glue-induced thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although cyanoacrylate glue closure for venous reflux is generally a safe and clinically effective treatment choice for patients with symptomatic chronic venous disease and axial reflux, some adverse events could be specific to the properties of the cyanoacrylate product. We propose mechanisms for how such reactions can occur based on histologic changes, published reports, and case examples; however, further exploration is necessary to confirm these theories.

Six Year Extension Study of Patients From a Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Venefit, Radiofrequency Induced Thermal Therapy, and Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins

OBJECTIVE

To compare long term outcomes after great saphenous vein (GSV) treatment with three radiofrequency (RF) thermal devices: Venefit (Closurefast), Radiofrequency Induced Thermal Therapy (RFITT), and Endovenous Radiofrequency (EVRF).

DESIGN

A 72 month follow up of patients who were treated in the randomised 3RF study.

METHODS

A total of 172 participants from the 3RF study were invited to take part in a single visit, long term, follow up study. Failure of GSV closure was assessed with duplex ultrasound (DUS) and constituted the primary outcome. Patients completed questionnaires for secondary outcomes: Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D), and patient reported varicose veins measured by counting vein occupying boxes in AVVQ question 1.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (12%) had already been re-treated. Of the remainder, 13 (7%) could not be contacted, 20 (11%) declined invitation, and one did not consent. Therefore, 116 (64%) and 95 (53%) participants completed questionnaires and DUS, respectively. Failure of GSV closure on 72 month DUS was 16%, 21%, and 37% for Venefit, RFITT, and EVRF, respectively (p = .14), whilst outcomes for all failures were 14%, 17%, and 44% (p < .001) (Venefit vs. EVRF: p < .001; RFITT vs. EVRF: p < .001; and Venefit vs. RFITT: p = .63). There were no between group differences in AVVQ or EQ-5D scores. Rates of patient reported presence of any varicose veins were high for all groups (97%, 92%, and 97% after Venefit, RFITT, and EVRF, respectively; p = .48). The EVRF treated participants reported more extensive recurrence than the Venefit and RFITT participants (p = .008).

CONCLUSION

Long term technical outcomes after RF ablation for GSV varicose veins were significantly better after Venefit and RFITT compared with EVRF treatment. However, quality of life scores showed no differences after 72 months. Rates of patient reporting any varicose veins were high for all treatments.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT04720027.

A network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of thermal and nonthermal endovenous ablation treatments

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the mid-term efficacy and safety of thermal and nonthermal endovenous ablation for the treatment of lower limb superficial venous insufficiency.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement and a Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary end points were great saphenous vein (GSV) closure and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) improvement. A meta-regression using GSV diameter as a covariate was undertaken for the two primary end points.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies and 4177 patients, with a mean follow-up of 25.7 months. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA; odds ratio [OR], 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-10.53), cyanoacrylate ablation (CAC; OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.35-8.37), and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA; OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.23-7.38) displayed increased odds for GSV closure compared with mechanochemical ablation (MOCA). MOCA inferiority compared with RFA (mean difference [MD], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71-1.20), EVLA (MD, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61-1.24), and CAC (MD, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65-1.15) was also depicted regarding VCSS improvement. EVLA resulted in an increased risk of postoperative paresthesia compared with MOCA (risk ratio [RR], 9.61; 95% CI, 2.32-62.29), CAC (RR, 7.90; 95% CI, 2.44-38.16), and RFA (RR, 6.96; 95% CI, 2.31-28.04). Although the overall analysis identified nonstatistically significant differences for Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire score improvement, thrombophlebitis, ecchymosis, and pain, further investigation revealed an increase pain profile for EVLA at 1470 nm compared with RFA (MD, 3.22; 95% CI, 0.93-5.47) and CAC (MD, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.05-4.97). A sensitivity analysis displayed a persistent underperformance of MOCA compared with RFA (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.15-55.54) for GSV closure and both RFA (MD, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.22-1.77) and CAC (MD, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.08-1.65) regarding VCCS improvement. Although no regression model reached statistical significance, the GSV closure regression model revealed a trend for considerably decreased efficacy for both CAC and MOCA with larger GSV diameters compared with RFA and EVLA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our analysis has produced skepticism regarding the efficacy of MOCA in the mid-term period for VCSS improvement and GSV closure rates, CAC showed equivalent results compared with both RFA and EVLA. Additionally, CAC displayed a decreased risk of postprocedural paresthesia and pigmentation and induration compared with EVLA. Also, both RFA and CAC had an improved pain profile compared with EVLA 1470 nm. The potential underperformance of nonthermal, nontumescent ablation modalities in ablating large GSVs necessitates further research.

The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex Scanning and Treatment of Superficial Truncal Reflux: Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine and the International Union of Phlebology

The Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society collaborated to update the 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum clinical practice guidelines and provide new evidence-based recommendations on critical issues affecting the care of patients with varicose veins. Each recommendation is based on a recent, independent systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic tests and treatments options for patients with lower extremity varicose veins. Part I of the guidelines includes evidence-based recommendations for the evaluation of patients with CEAP (Clinical Class, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathology) class 2 varicose vein using duplex ultrasound scanning and other diagnostic tests, open surgical treatment (ligation and stripping) vs endovenous ablation techniques, thermal vs nonthermal ablation of the superficial truncal veins, and management of incompetent perforating veins in CEAP class 2 disease. We have also made recommendations on the concomitant vs staged treatment of varicose tributaries using phlebectomy or liquid or foam sclerotherapy (with physician-compounded foam or commercially prepared polidocanol endovenous microfoam) for patients undergoing ablation of incompetent superficial truncal veins.

The First Latin American Consensus on Superficial and Perforating Venous Mapping

With the aim of obtaining a map which is useful as a diagnostic tool and therapeutical orientation, complementing the written report of duplex ultrasound venous study, Latin-American Scientific Societies of Phlebology, Vascular Surgery and Vascular Imaging were invited to participate, through their regional representatives, to the First Consensus of Superficial and Perforating Venous Mapping. A consensus process using a modified Delphi method was carried out. An International Working Group was formed, which developed a Prototype of the Venous Mapping that worked as a starting point for consensus, and was presented in a first virtual meeting of 54 experts (societies' representatives) when the methodology was explained. For the consensus process, two rounds of self-administrated questionnaires with feedback were used. In the first questionnaire a 100% consensus was obtained in the 15 statements (an agreement range of 85.2% to 100%) In the analysis of qualitative data, three categories according to the actions to implement were identified - actions which involved no action, minor changes and major changes. This analysis was used to build the second questionnaire, which reached a consensus in its six statements (agreement range of 87.1% to 98.1%). A final consensus on every field proposed was established with the approval of all the experts consulted and it was presented at a third online meeting. The document of the superficial and perforating venous mapping reached by consensus is presented hereafter.

Early results of cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency in the Chinese mainland population

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we present our early outcomes of cyanoacrylate ablation (CA) versus endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency in the Chinese mainland population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients (53 patients in the CA group and 55 patients in the EVLA group) with GSV insufficiency who were treated with CA and EVLA between May 2020 and May 2021. The Venous Clinical Severity Score and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire were used to assess clinical symptoms and quality of life, respectively. Total closure rates and procedure-related adverse events were also recorded in both groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between patients treated with CA or EVLA in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. The average procedure time was 17 min in the CA group and 35 min in the EVLA group (p < 0.001). The CA group had lower pain scores during the procedure and 3 days afterward than the EVLA group (p < 0.001). At month 12, the CA group had a 90.4% closure rate, while the EVLA group had an 83.0% closure rate, with no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the Venous Clinical Severity Score or Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score between the groups (p > 0.05). During follow-up, neither group experienced any significant adverse events, such as pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis. The incidence of ecchymosis and paresthesia was significantly lower in the CA group than in the EVLA group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cyanoacrylate ablation has a high feasibility profile and is an effective approach to accomplish complete GSV target vein closure at early follow-up in the Chinese patients. Compared to EVLA, the improvement in quality-of-life outcomes is also sustained and similar, with less pain and fewer complications due to the absence of tumescence anesthesia and postprocedural compression stockings.

Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Extremities: A State-of-the Art Review

Chronic venous disease is a common disease, the prevalence of which increases with age, and can cause debilitating symptoms that adversely affect the quality of life. The risk factors include family history, female sex, obesity, pregnancy, parity, and history of deep vein thrombosis. Moreover, it is associated with venous obstruction, reflux, or both, which, in turn, leads to ambulatory venous hypertension. Chronic venous disease is the leading cause of leg ulcers, which place a significant cost burden on the health care system. Compression therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment, particularly for more advanced disease. Superficial saphenous vein reflux can be associated with significant symptoms. Catheter techniques, both thermal and nonthermal, have demonstrated efficacy and safety in successful closure and symptom improvement. Deep vein obstruction can be broadly divided into thrombotic and nonthrombotic and can lead to symptomatic chronic venous disease. Recanalization using balloons and stents has been increasingly used and studied in such patients. It is critical to develop training opportunities and guidelines to improve evidence-based and appropriate care for cardiologists treating chronic venous disease.

Mid-term results of radiofrequency ablation with multiple heat cycles for incompetent saphenous veins

OBJECTIVE

Recent reports suggest that the number of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) cycles impacts the depth of vein wall damage. This study evaluates the mid-term occlusion rate after delivering increased energy during RFA of incompetent saphenous veins.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2019, consecutive patients who underwent RFA with multiple heat cycles were enrolled in the study. The exclusion criterion was previous treatment history for chronic venous disease. Duplex ultrasound data and medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 217 patients (345 veins). Follow-up examinations were performed for 65% of treated veins after 6 months, 31% after 12 months, and 26% after more than 24 months with a mean follow-up period of 23 ± 18.9 months. The numbers of great saphenous and small saphenous veins were 178 and 62, respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier method, the occlusion rate of saphenous veins was 100% at 3 years and 95.4% at 5 years. Except for one case (0.3%) of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis class 2, no significant side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of RFA with multiple heat cycles for incompetent saphenous veins exhibits good clinical outcomes considering mid-term occlusion rate without an increase in side effects.

Septicemia after cyanoacrylate glue closure of varicose veins

Cyanoacrylate glue closure (CAC) is being increasingly used as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of symptomatic incompetent saphenous veins. The most common adverse event associated with CAC has been phlebitis, including hypersensitivity phlebitis, superficial thrombophlebitis, and granulomatous phlebitis. This complication can be serious and debilitating. In the present report, we have described a case of symptomatic septicemia after CAC that required surgical excision of the treated saphenous veins.

Modification of protocol with one extra drop of endovascular cyanoacrylate improved closure rates in incompetent great saphenous veins

Introduction

Great saphenous vein diameter (GSV) of >8 mm was predictor of recanalization following Venaseal cyanoacrylate treatment. The aim of this study was to report our modified protocol with a single extra-drop for treatment for GSV>8 mm, and comparative duplex results in closure rates.

Methods

Patients in our single-centre registry treated with Venaseal were followed up by serial duplex examinations at week 1 and month(s)- 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and then annually. The primary endpoint was successful obliteration of the GSV, secondary endpoints were closure distance from Saphenofemoral junction (SFJ), presence of endovenous glue-induced thrombosis (EGIT) or deep vein thrombosis.

Results

A total of 243 legs in 123 consecutive patients with duplex-proven SFJ/GSV incompetence were included in this study between September 2014 and October 2020. The median duplex follow-up period of this cohort of patients was 24 (range 0.2–58) months. Comparing closure rates in GSV diameter ≥8 mm treated with normal protocol, the ‘extra-drop protocol’ significantly improved closure rates ( p = .034). However, the closure rates of ≥8 mm GSV treated with ‘extra-drop protocol’ was still not as good as GSV <8 mm ( p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the stump distance between the three groups and no difference in the occurrence of EGIT. There were no deep vein thrombosis.

Conclusion

Our experience showed that VenaSeal cyanoacrylate worked best in GSV<8 mm diameter. Even in GSV diameter of ≥8 mm which has a higher recanalization rate on follow-up duplex, our modified extra-drop protocol significantly improved the closure rates, and did not predispose to development of EGIT.

Third-generation treatment of varicose veins: cyanoacrylate adhesive closure and mechanochemical ablation

Background: The mainstream of incompetent saphenous veins treatment has dramatically changed from the first-generation conventional high ligation and stripping surgery to the second-generation endovenous thermal ablation as a minimally invasive technique using laser or radiofrequency. The third-generation treatment of nonthermal non-tumescent techniques is already available, including cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC) and mechanochemical ablation (MOCA).Current Concepts: The non-thermal non-tumescent techniques are developed to overcome the complications of thermal ablation, including nerve injury and vein perforation. The technique also reduces the need for painful tumescent anesthesia and postoperative compression. MOCA employs a dual injury using a single-catheter-based delivery system consisting of a mechanical abrasion with a rotating wire and chemical ablation with a sclerosant. CAC is executed by injecting a glue that produces a polymer with the blood and obliterates the lumen. CAC does not need tumescent anesthesia and postoperative compression. Therefore, patient recovery is fast and satisfaction is excellent. However, the new devices are expensive and not included in the medical insurance in Korea, and long-term effects of the new treatments are unproven; therefore, the cost-effectiveness is unconfirmed.Discussion and Conclusion: MOCA and CAC are newly developed minimal invasive treatments for varicose veins. They are reported to be safe and effective techniques. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Real-world short-term VenaSeal ablation outcomes for symptomatic saphenous incompetence

OBJECTIVE

Chronic venous insufficiency is a common vascular condition with significant resultant patient morbidity. There has been a shift towards minimally invasive treatment modalities with VenaSeal endovenous ablation among the more recent treatment modalities introduced. Long-term outcome data for this treatment modality is not widely available yet. We aim to report 6-week patient outcomes over a 5-year period from a high-volume tertiary vascular centre.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-centre study reporting short-term outcomes following VenaSeal endovenous ablation for symptomatic saphenous incompetence. Patients were followed-up at 6-weeks post-procedurally by telemedicine or in-person clinic appointment without routine venous ultrasound assessment.

RESULTS

We report outcomes for 235 patients during this study period. All patients tolerated the procedure under local anaesthesia. Average age was 60.5 years (29-82 years) with slight male predominance (55.7%). The majority were New Zealand European (63.8%). Mean body mass index was 28.5 (22.2-41.4). We report a 21% rate of self-limiting phlebitis and 33 minor complication events. These include 15 cases of residual varicose veins, 9 saphenous nerve neuropraxia, 6 cases of puncture-site cellulitis and 3 deep vein thromboses. Patient demographics and primary surgeon did not have a statistically significant outcome on development of complications.

CONCLUSION

We report that VenaSeal endovenous ablation is a safe and effective method of treatment for symptomatic truncal saphenous vein incompetence. We report safely managing post-operative phlebitis conservatively and find a mixture of clinical and phone clinic follow-up sufficient without requirement for objective duplex ultrasound following the procedure to ensure objective saphenous vein closure.

Comparison of Modified Above-Knee and Conventional Surgery with the Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein of Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects of modified above-knee and conventional surgery with the stripping of the great saphenous vein of varicose veins of the lower extremities.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with a varicose vein of the lower extremity from May 2016 to May 2018 were collected. A retrospective study was conducted on the patients receiving modified above-knee and conventional surgery with the great saphenous vein stripping. The baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up data were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). The surgeries were successfully performed by the same group of surgeons under local anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia. The hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total length, and number of incisions in the above-knee group were comparable to those in the conventional surgery group (P > 0.05). The incidence of saphenous nerve injury and subcutaneous hematoma in the above-knee group was lower than that in the conventional surgery group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in recurrent varicose vein incidences (P > 0.05). After surgery, the venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) scores of both groups were higher than those before operation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in VCSS score or CIVIQ-14 scores between the two groups postoperation (P > 0.05). At 24 months after surgery, the above-knee group (71.8%) and conventional surgery group (73.2%) resulted in changes of at least two CEAP-C clinical classes lower than baseline, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The modified above-knee technique can ensure clinical outcomes, reduce intraoperative blood loss and complication incidences, and shorten the operative time. This gives evidence that the modified above-knee technique is worthy of clinical application.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovenous Laser Ablation, n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the long-term results regarding the effectiveness and reliability of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), endovenous n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) application and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) methods in the management of Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).

METHODS

Charts of patients treated with EVLA, NBCA and RFA methods for CVI between January 1^st, 2014 and January 1^st, 2017, were reviewed. Records were made of personal information including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) and admission symptoms. Great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter, score of CEAP (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy and Pathophysiology) classification, and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) were also noted. All patients were followed up with physical examination and CDUS at the first week, and 6^th and 12^th months after the procedures. After 12^th month, follow-ups were annual.

RESULTS

Enrolled in the study were a total of 232 patients who underwent lower limb CVI procedures (77 patients with EVLA, 73 patients with NBCA and 82 patients with RFA). The mean follow-up time was 67.5±4.7 months. Time of procedure was significantly shorter in patients treated with NBCA (13.5 minutes) in comparison of patients treated with EVLA (31.7 minutes) and RFA (27.9 minutes) (p= 0.001). Pain score was highest in EVLA group (p= 0.001). Significantly higher complication rates and longer time to return daily activity was recorded in those undergoing EVLA procedure (p= 0.001). Post hoc analysis revealed comparable occlusion success among groups on post-operative first day, and at 6^th month, first year and second year. However, significantly better success of occlusion rates were found for RFA in comparison of EVLA in third and fifth-years follow-ups (p= 0.024 and p= 0.011). The success of NBCA and RFA was similar in third and fifth-years follow-ups (p= 0.123 vs p= 0.330) CONCLUSION: Outcomes showed similar levels of early postoperative occlusion success among all three CVI treatment techniques, but RFA has a significantly higher success rate over EVLA in the third and fifth-year follow-ups. Additionally, NBCA and RFA procedures achieved comparable long-term success. EVLA was associated with significantly higher complication rates and pain scores, and longer time to return daily activities, while NBCA procedure had a significantly shorter operation time than the other procedures.

Cyanoacrylate Granuloma After Cyanoacrylate Closure of Incompetent Saphenous Veins

BACKGROUND

Cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) is a minimally invasive surgery to treat incompetent saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence, the risk factors for, and the management of cyanoacrylate granuloma (CAG) after CAC of incompetent saphenous veins in patients with chronic venous disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data specific to incompetent saphenous veins, including great saphenous veins, anterior accessory saphenous veins, and small saphenous veins, that were treated with CAC were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 126 saphenous veins from 101 patients were included. Recapture of the delivery catheter before withdrawal was not performed in all patients. Cyanoacrylate granuloma occurred in 3 of 101 (2.9%) patients, and in 3 of 126 (2.3%) treated saphenous veins. All patients with CAG presented with granuloma and abscess at the puncture site 3 to 5 months after CAC. All patients were treated with incision, drainage, and removal of the glue foreign body. No recurrent granuloma was observed during the study period. No patient or procedural predictive factor for CAG was identified.

CONCLUSION

Cyanoacrylate granuloma is not a rare complication after CAC when recapture of the delivery catheter is not performed. Patients should be advised of the possibility of CAG after CAC.

Comparative analysis of the results of cyanoacrylate ablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of venous insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Varicose vein treatment has shifted to less invasive techniques owing to the complications associated with traditional treatment. The present study was designed to compare the effectiveness of cyanoacrylate ablation (CAA) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

Patients who had undergone RFA vs CAA (634 vs 246 patients) to treat great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency during a 5-year period were included in the present study. The preoperative and postoperative CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) class, symptoms, recurrence, and Doppler ultrasound findings were compared.

RESULTS

All the veins in both groups were occluded at day 5. The 1-month closure rates were 97.3% and 98.7% for RFA and CAA, respectively. The overall postoperative closure rates at 5 years were 93.1% and 91.1% for RFA and CAA, respectively. The postoperative symptoms, CEAP class, and Doppler ultrasound findings were similar in both groups. The 5-year symptom-free survival rates were 73.5% and 72.0% in the RFA and CAA groups, respectively. The venous clinical severity scores had decreased from 5.9 ± 1.2 to 0.9 ± 0.8 and 5.8 ± 0.9 to 0.8 ± 0.6 in the RFA and CAA groups, respectively. The Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire scores had decreased from 19.7 ± 5.5 to 4.8 ± 1.5 in the RFA group and from 18.9 ± 5.8 to 4.9 ± 1.4 in the CAA group.

CONCLUSIONS

CAA seems to be the ideal treatment for GSV insufficiency because it is suitable for most patients and is nonthermal and nontumescent, with satisfactory results comparable to those with RFA. Long-term outcomes and cost analyses from larger series are required to confirm our findings.

Current strategies for endovascular management of varicose veins: An updated review of superficial ablation technologies

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) which causes varicose veins and venous ulcers, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the general population. The last several years have witnessed many revolutionary developments in the realms of minimally invasive techniques (both thermal and non-thermal) to treat CVI. Moreover, multiple newer societal recommendations have been published over the past one year on the basis of the current evidence. In this article, we will briefly summarise the imaging for varicose veins and review the existing evidence in literature as well as the current guidelines and recommendations for the management of varicose veins, especially focusing on the various superficial ablation technologies.

Infective thrombophlebitis after great saphenous vein cyanoacrylate embolization

The use of cyanoacrylate embolization has increased in interest as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive method to treat symptomatic saphenous reflux. The procedure is generally well tolerated by patients, and complications such as phlebitis are minor and usually self-limiting. Postprocedural infections have been described but occur infrequently and usually in the early postoperative course. In the present case report, we have described a late-onset infective thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein after cyanoacrylate embolization, requiring surgical excision of the treated vein.

A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins

BACKGROUND

Several diagnostic tests and treatment options for patients with lower extremity varicose veins have existed for decades. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the latest evidence to support the forthcoming updates of the clinical practice guidelines on the management of varicose veins for the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), the American Venous Forum (AVF) and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for studies that addressed four clinical questions identified by the AVF and the SVS guideline committee about evaluating and treating patients with varicose veins. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted when feasible.

RESULTS

We included 73 original studies (45 were randomized controlled trials) and 1 systematic review from 12,915 candidate references. Moderate certainty of evidence supported the usefulness of duplex ultrasound (DUS) examination as the gold standard test for diagnosing saphenous vein incompetence in patients with varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency (clinical, etiological, anatomic, pathophysiological classification [CEAP] class C2-C6). High ligation and stripping (HL/S) was associated with higher anatomic closure rates at 30 days and 5 years when compared with radiofrequency ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) (moderate certainty), while no significant difference was seen when compared with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) at 5 years. UGFS was associated with an increased risk of recurrence compared with HL/S. EVLA was associated with lower anatomic closure rates at 30 days than cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) and higher rates at one and 5 years when compared with UGFS. Thermal interventions were associated with lower generic quality of life scores and an increased risk of adverse events when compared with CAC or n-butyl cyanoacrylate (low certainty). Thermal interventions were associated with a lower risk of recurrent incompetence when compared with UGFS and an increased risk of recurrent incompetence than CAC. The evidence for great saphenous vein ablation alone to manage perforator disease was inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

The current systematic review summarizes the evidence to develop and support forthcoming updated SVS/AVF/American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guideline recommendations. The evidence supports duplex scanning for evaluating patients with varicose veins and confirms that HL/S resulted in similar long-term saphenous vein closure rates as EVLA and in better rates than radiofrequency ablation and UGFS. Thermal interventions were associated with inferior generic quality of life scores than nonthermal interventions, but had a lower risk of recurrent incompetence than UGFS. The recommendations in the guidelines should consider this information as well as other factors such as patients' values and preferences, anatomic considerations of individual patients, and surgical expertise.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Current Varicose Veins Treatments

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of technologies for treatment of varicose veins over 5 years - conservative care (CONS), surgery (HL/S), ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) and cyanoacrylate glue occlusion (CAE).

METHODS

A systematic review was updated and used to construct a Markov decision model. Outcomes were re-intervention on the truncal vein, re-treatment of residual varicosities and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs over five years.

RESULTS

UGFS has a significantly greater re-intervention rate than other procedures, while there is no significant difference between the other procedures. The cost per QALY of EVLA versus UGFS in our base-case model is £16966 ($23700) per QALY, which is considered cost-effective in the UK. RFA, MOCA and CAE have greater procedure costs than EVLA with no evidence of greater benefit for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

EVLA is the most cost-effective therapeutic option, with RFA a close second, in adult patients requiring treatment in the upper leg for incompetence of the GSV. MOCA, UGFS, CAE, CONS and HL/S are not cost-effective at current prices in the UK National Health Service. MOCA and CAE appear promising but further evidence on effectiveness, re-interventions and health-related quality of life is needed, as well as how cost-effectiveness may vary across settings and reimbursement systems.

A multicenter randomized controlled trial of cyanoacrylate closure and surgical stripping for incompetent great saphenous veins

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of varicose veins has shifted from conventional surgical stripping (SS) to minimally invasive endovenous modalities. Cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) with the VenaSeal system (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) has increased in popularity owing to its nonthermal and nontumescent technique. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of CAC and SS for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins.

METHODS

An open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted. The subjects were randomized to either the CAC or SS procedure. The primary endpoint of the present study was to evaluate complete closure of the target vein at 3 months. Target vein occlusion was assessed on the third day and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using duplex ultrasound. The pain and ecchymosis grades were also assessed. Additionally, the clinical outcomes, such as the venous clinical severity score and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score, were assessed.

RESULTS

Three-month follow-up data were obtained for all 126 enrolled and randomized subjects (63 with CAC and 63 with SS). At 3 months, complete target vein closure was observed in both groups. The postoperative pain score was significantly better in the CAC group than in the SS group (0.3 ± 0.6 in the CAC group and 1.1 ± 1.5 in the SS group; P < .001). In addition, the mean ecchymosis grade was 0.3 ± 0.5 in the CAC group and 1.1 ± 1.1 in the SS group (P < .001). The venous clinical severity score and quality of life had improved equally in both groups. The adverse events after both procedures were mostly minor complications (9 events in CAC group and 20 events in SS group). Major complications occurred in one patient who had undergone the SS procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAC and SS procedures were both associated with complete occlusion of the target vein at 3 months. The postoperative pain and ecchymosis grades were significantly lower in the CAC group. Other differences between the two groups included the frequency and nature of the complications. The results showed that CAC has high success with few complications.

Changes of stump length depending on starting position of glue injection related to venous diameter during cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent saphenous veins

OBJECTIVES

A common pattern of recurrence after cyanoacrylate treatment of incompetent saphenous veins has been associated with reflux from the residual stump. The purpose of this study was to analyze the starting point of cyanoacrylate glue injection from the junction to decrease stump length.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed using prospectively collected data of patients with cyanoacrylate closure (CAC). Preoperatively, the diameter of the saphenous vein was measured. CAC was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. After the procedure, clinical outcomes including pain, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and quality of life (QoL) using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) were evaluated. Postoperative duplex scanning was performed to evaluate the occlusion rate of the target vein, stump length, and presence of endovenous glue-induced thrombosis (EGIT). The stump length was analyzed according to the preoperative venous diameter to determine the proper point of glue injection to decrease the stump length.

RESULTS

During the study period, CAC was performed in 408 patients. Mean age was 56.2±11.5 years (range, 19 to 84 years). A total of 279 patients (68.4%) were women. Occlusion of the target vein was achieved in all patients. After the procedure, pain, VCSS, and QoL were improved (P<.001). EGIT developed in 5.8% of patients. There was a 1.53-fold linear increase in the stump length by for every 1-mm increment of the preoperative venous diameter. In 20 patients with a venous diameter ≥5 mm, glue injection was performed safely 4 cm distal to the junction to decrease the stump length.

CONCLUSION

The stump length linearly increased with an increase in the saphenous vein diameter. If the diameter of the saphenous vein is more than 5 mm, cyanoacrylate glue may be injected 4 cm distal to the junction to decrease stump length.

Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence

BACKGROUND

Great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, causing varicose veins and venous insufficiency, makes up the majority of lower-limb superficial venous diseases. Treatment options for GSV incompetence include surgery (also known as high ligation and stripping), laser and radiofrequency ablation, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. Newer treatments include cyanoacrylate glue, mechanochemical ablation, and endovenous steam ablation. These techniques avoid the need for a general anaesthetic, and may result in fewer complications and improved quality of life (QoL). These treatments should be compared to inform decisions on treatment for varicosities in the GSV. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endovenous steam ablation (EVSA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), cyanoacrylate glue, mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) and high ligation and stripping (HL/S) for the treatment of varicosities of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and AMED databases, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 2 November 2020. We undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) treating participants for varicosities of the GSV using EVLA, RFA, EVSA, UGFS, cyanoacrylate glue, MOCA or HL/S. Key outcomes of interest are technical success, recurrence, complications and QoL.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, applied Cochrane's risk of bias tool, and extracted data. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 new RCTs for this update. Therefore, we included 24 RCTs with 5135 participants. Duration of follow-up ranged from five weeks to eight years. Five comparisons included single trials. For comparisons with more than one trial, we could only pool data for 'technical success' and 'recurrence' due to heterogeneity in outcome definitions and time points reported. All trials had some risk of bias concerns. Here we report the clinically most relevant comparisons. EVLA versus RFA Technical success was comparable up to five years (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.38; 5 studies, 780 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); over five years, there was no evidence of a difference (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.41; 1 study, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported recurrence, showing no clear difference at three years (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.99; 291 participants; low-certainty evidence), but a benefit for RFA may be seen at five years (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.06; 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). EVLA versus UGFS Technical success may be better in EVLA participants up to five years (OR 6.13, 95% CI 0.98 to 38.27; 3 studies, 588 participants; low-certainty evidence), and over five years (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.60 to 16.10; 3 studies, 534 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was no clear difference in recurrence up to three years and at five years (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.36; 2 studies, 443 participants; and OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.87; 2 studies, 418 participants; very low-certainty evidence, respectively). EVLA versus HL/S Technical success may be better in EVLA participants up to five years (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.23; 6 studies, 1051 participants; low-certainty evidence). No clear difference in technical success was seen at five years and beyond (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.50; 5 studies, 874 participants; low-certainty evidence). Recurrence was comparable within three years and at 5 years (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.29; 7 studies, 1459 participants; and OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.76; 7 studies, 1267 participants; moderate-certainty evidence, respectively). RFA versus MOCA There was no clear difference in technical success (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.06 to 54.15; 3 studies, 435 participants; low-certainty evidence), or recurrence (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.81; 3 studies, 389 participants; low-certainty evidence). Long-term data are not available. RFA versus HL/S No clear difference in technical success was detected up to five years (OR 5.71, 95% CI 0.64 to 50.81; 2 studies, 318 participants; low-certainty evidence); over five years, there was no evidence of a difference (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.69; 1 study, 289 participants; low-certainty evidence). No clear difference in recurrence was detected up to three years (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.51; 4 studies, 546 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but a possible long-term benefit for RFA was seen (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.75; 1 study, 289 participants; low-certainty evidence). UGFS versus HL/S Meta-analysis showed a possible benefit for HL/S compared with UGFS in technical success up to five years (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.94; 4 studies, 954 participants; low-certainty evidence), and over five years (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30; 3 studies, 525 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No clear difference was detected in recurrence up to three years (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.77; 3 studies, 822 participants; low-certainty evidence), and after five years (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.71; 3 studies, 639 participants; low-certainty evidence). Complications were generally low for all interventions, but due to different definitions and time points, we were unable to draw conclusions (very-low certainty evidence). Similarly, most studies evaluated QoL but used different questionnaires at variable time points. Rates of QoL improvement were comparable between interventions at follow-up (moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our conclusions are limited due to the relatively small number of studies for each comparison and differences in outcome definitions and time points reported. Technical success was comparable between most modalities. EVLA may offer improved technical success compared to UGFS or HL/S. HL/S may have improved technical success compared to UGFS. No evidence of a difference was detected in recurrence, except for a possible long-term benefit for RFA compared to EVLA or HL/S. Studies which provide more evidence on the breadth of treatments are needed. Future trials should seek to standardise clinical terminology of outcome measures and the time points at which they are measured.

Interventions for great saphenous vein reflux: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

A variety of endovascular and open surgical interventions exist to treat great saphenous vein reflux. However, comparisons of treatment outcomes have been inconsistent.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to compare rates of incomplete stripping or non-occlusion of the great saphenous vein with or without reflux (anatomical failure) at early, mid- and long-term follow-up; and secondary outcomes (reintervention and clinical recurrence) among intervention groups. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) method was used to estimate the probability of the intervention with the lowest anatomical failure rates.

RESULTS

Some 72 RCTs were included. Comparisons of endothermal techniques with open surgery were mostly not significantly different, except for endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), which had higher long-term anatomical failure rates (pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.87, 95 per cent c.i. 1.14 to 3.07). Mechanochemical ablation had higher anatomical failure rates than radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (pooled RR 2.77, 1.38 to 5.53), and cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) had a RR 0.56 (0.34 to 0.93) times lower than either RFA or EVLA at the early term. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy had a higher risk of anatomical failure and reintervention than open surgery, with the lowest SUCRA value, and CAC was ranked first, third and first for best intervention for anatomical failure at early, mid and long term respectively. However, clinical recurrence rates were not significantly different between all comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Mechanochemical ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy performed poorly, with higher anatomical failure rates in the long term. The other treatment modalities had similar rates of anatomical failure in the short and mid term.

Symptom improvement after cyanoacrylate glue adhesion and endovenous laser ablation in low-grade CEAP clinical classes

OBJECTIVE

Low-grade primary superficial venous reflux (C₀ - C₃EpAsPr) is a common feature of chronic venous disease. However, the procedural efficacy focusing on symptom characteristics and improvement patterns in this population has not been fully explored.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2019, 325 limbs from 279 patients with C₀ - C₃EpAsPr (including 66.1% with C0-1) who underwent cyanoacrylate ablation (CA) with ultrasonography-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with UGFS were included in this study. Venous symptoms were classified into five categories: leg heaviness, calf cramping, itching sensation, pain, and numbness. A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of a prospectively designed case report form (CRF) was performed to identify the improvement magnitude of each symptom. As secondary outcomes, postoperative changes in symptom severity (0 - 5 points), the Venous Reflux Originated Severity Score (VROSS), the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the ChronIc Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) were evaluated by performing a three-month postoperative data analysis.

RESULTS

After adjusting the data, 174 limbs (87 CA with UGFS and 87 EVLA with UGFS) were matched. Symptoms that showed the greatest improvement after treatment were night cramping (94.7%) and itching (93.8%), followed by heaviness (85.2%), numbness (77.8%), and pain (60.9%). All symptom improvement scores after each endovenous procedure showed similar patterns in both groups. Advantages of CA with UGFS over EVLA with UGFS were observed in procedure time (20.1± 10.6 min vs. 28.4± 10.9 min, p = .001) and perioperative visual analogue pain scores (2.99± 2.34 vs. 3.74 ± 2.49, p = .03). Compared to preoperative values, VROSS, VCSS, CIVIQ-14, and symptom severity scores were significantly improved in both groups (all p < .001). Improvements in all five symptoms (p = .085 to 1.0), VCSS (p = .435), CIVIQ-14 (p = .788) and satisfaction scores (p = .392) three months postoperatively were comparable between the two groups. There were two cases of endovenous glue-induced thrombosis and 24 (27.6%) cases of type IV hypersensitivity reactions in the CA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive endovenous surgery with CA and EVLA provides significant symptom improvement for patients with low-grade CEAP classes.

Registry to investigate the efficacy and safety of the VenaBlock© VeIn SEaling system for VaRicose veins in SingApore - Six months results of the RIVIERA trial

BACKGROUND

The Venablock^© Venous Closure System (Invamed, Ankara, Turkey) is a novel cyanoacrylate-based non-thermal non-tumescent embolization device to block refluxing truncal veins for chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. The aim was to prospectively evaluate the safety and 6 months efficacy of Venablock^© for the treatment of primary great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetency in a multi-ethnic cohort from Singapore.

METHODS

This was a single arm, single investigator prospective study of 29 patients (39 limbs, 39 truncal veins) recruited over a 5-month period (August 2019 to February 2020), who were treated with the Venablock^© device at a tertiary vascular unit in Singapore. Patients with symptomatic varicose veins (C2-6) and had truncal reflux > 0.5 second on venous Duplex ultrasound were included. Follow-up occurred at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months with dedicated quality of life questionnaires and a targeted Duplex ultrasound performed to check for continued venous occlusion.

RESULT

Mean age was 61.4 (±11.0) years and mean BMI was 26.2 (±5.7) kg/m². 11/29 (37.9%) were males. Most common CEAP class treated was 2 (12/29, 41.3%). Mean diameter of treated GSV was 5.7 (±2.0) mm, 4.8 (±1.7) mm and 4.2 (±1.3) mm for the proximal, mid and distal above knee segments respectively. Mean time from access puncture to sheath removal was 23.4 (±10.0) mins. Vein occlusion at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months was 39/39 (100%), 39/39 (100%) and 36/37 (97.2%) respectively. 5/29 (17.2%) developed puncture site infections, of which 3/29 (7.7%) required formal surgical drainage. 3/29 (7.7%) developed phlebitis. At 6 months, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score improved from 5.2 (±3.5) to 2.1 (±2.9; p < .001); EuroQol-5 Dimension score, from 7.4 (±2.1) to 5.7 (±1.4; p < .001); Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score, from 18.1 (±15.5) to 7.9 (±8.9; p = .007); and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire, from 18.6 (±16.2) to 4.5 (±6.3; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Venablock^© is a safe and efficacious option of treating truncal venous insufficiency in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort from Singapore in the short term. There is a significant improvement in QoL. Longer follow-up is required to assess the durability of this technique, in particular the higher puncture site infection rates observed compared to other glue-based therapies.