A rose by any other name: is stage 3a chronic kidney disease really a disease?

Relationship between vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity and vancomycin trough concentration in older adults: A retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to investigate the risk factors of vancomycin-induced renal toxicity in older adults, especially in those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages 3-5.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, serum vancomycin trough concentrations (VTCs) in patients aged g65 years treated with vancomycin were analyzed, and independent risk factors of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN) were determined by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 321 patients were included in this study. Serum VTC was an independent risk factor for vancomycin-induced renal toxicity in total cohort (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; P = 0.004) as well as in the cohort with CKD Stages 3-5 (OR, 1.09; P = 0.010). A daily dose of vancomycin and Charlson comorbidity index was an independent risk factor for vancomycin-induced renal toxicity in total cohort (OR, 3.63; P = 0.006) and in the cohort with CKD Stage 3-5 (OR, 1.83; P = 0.002), respectively. In older adults with CKD Stages 3a and 3b-5, the VTCs associated with higher risk for vancomycin-induced renal toxicity were 21.5 mg/L and 16.5 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults, serum VTC is an independent risk factor for VIN. VTCs over 21.5 mg/L and 16.5 mg/L are associated with increased risk of VIN in this population with CKD Stage 3a and 3b-5, respectively.

CKD: A Call for an Age-Adapted Definition

Current criteria for the diagnosis of CKD in adults include persistent signs of kidney damage, such as increased urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio or a GFR below the threshold of 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 This threshold has important caveats because it does not separate kidney disease from kidney aging, and therefore does not hold for all ages. In an extensive review of the literature, we found that GFR declines with healthy aging without any overt signs of compensation (such as elevated single-nephron GFR) or kidney damage. Older living kidney donors, who are carefully selected based on good health, have a lower predonation GFR compared with younger donors. Furthermore, the results from the large meta-analyses conducted by the CKD Prognosis Consortium and from numerous other studies indicate that the GFR threshold above which the risk of mortality is increased is not consistent across all ages. Among younger persons, mortality is increased at GFR <75 ml/min per 1.73 m2, whereas in elderly people it is increased at levels <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 Therefore, we suggest that amending the CKD definition to include age-specific thresholds for GFR. The implications of an updated definition are far reaching. Having fewer healthy elderly individuals diagnosed with CKD could help reduce inappropriate care and its associated adverse effects. Global prevalence estimates for CKD would be substantially reduced. Also, using an age-specific threshold for younger persons might lead to earlier identification of CKD onset for such individuals, at a point when progressive kidney damage may still be preventable.

Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: think (at least) twice!

The introduction of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines has substantially contributed to the early detection of different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several recent studies from different parts of the world mention a CKD prevalence of between 8 and 13%. There are several reasons the CKD prevalence found in a study of a particular population is clearly overestimated. The structure of the population pyramid (young or older age) of the study sample may result in high or low CKD prevalence. The absence of using an isotope dilution mass spectrometry creatinine assay can be the source of high bias in CKD prevalence. In addition, using an arbitrary single threshold of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) for classifying CKD leads to a substantial 'overdiagnosis' (false positives) in the elderly (>65 years of age), particularly in those without albuminuria (or proteinuria), haematuria or hypertension. It also results in a significant 'underdiagnosis' (false negatives) in younger individuals with an eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and below the third percentile for their age/gender category. The use of third percentile eGFR rates as a cut-off based on age/gender-specific reference values of eGFR allows the detection of these false positives and negatives. In the present article, we focus on an important and frequently omitted criterion in epidemiological studies: chronicity. Indeed, the two most important factors introducing a high number (up to 50%) of false positives are lack of confirming proteinuria and the absence of proof of chronicity of the eGFR found at first screening. There is an urgent need for quality studies of the prevalence of CKD using representative randomized samples of the population, applying the KDIGO guidelines correctly.

Prophylactic hydration to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy: much ado about nothing?

Clinical guidelines recommend prophylactic hydration to reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in high-risk patients, including those with chronic kidney disease. A recent single-center randomized trial showed no significant difference in the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in ambulatory patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease who were randomized to no prophylactic hydration versus normal saline hydration. While these results may identify patients who are less likely to benefit from prophylactic hydration, nephrologists and interventionalists should carefully consider the generalizability of these results to individual patients.