Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is really a good option?

INTRODUCTION

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (LUKA) account for only < 1% of all knee arthroplasties and for only 5-10% of all unicompartmental knee replacements. This means that there is less published literature on these procedures and that the surgeon's experience with them is smaller than with medial UKA. The aim of this study was to analyze the survival and the clinical-functional outcomes of LUKA according to the type of bearing surface (all-polyethylene versus metal-backed) used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study including 42 LUKAs operated between 2009 and 2021. Two fixed polyethylene-bearing models were used: the all-polyethylene ACCURIS knee (38%) and the metal-backed Triathlon PKR system (62%). Demographic parameters, knee range of motion (ROM), tibiofemoral alignment, implant survival (as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier curve), and clinical-functional outcomes (as measured with the Knee Society Score) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Average patient age was 65.5 (range, 36-87) years and mean follow-up was 8.2 (range, 2.1-12.8) years. Thirty LUKAs (71.4%) were implanted in women. The main reason for performing a LUKA was osteoarthritis (88.1%). No patient developed post-surgical complications or had to be re-operated. Overall LUKA survival was 100% at 1-year and 5-year's follow-up. Knee Society Score, knee ROM and tibiofemoral alignment all improved significantly post-surgery (p < 0.001). The clinical Knee Society Score increased from 46.5 ± 14.5 pre-surgery to 93.5 ± 10.3 post-surgery, the functional Knee Society Score increased from 48.1 ± 13.5 pre-surgery to 94.6 ± 9.3 post-surgery, maximum flexion increased from 108.5 ± 8.7 degrees pre-surgery to 121 ± 8.9 degrees post-surgery and tibiofemoral alignment was corrected from 13.1 ± 1.74 degrees pre-surgery to 5.7 ± 0.8 degrees post-surgery. There were no statistically significant clinical-functional improvement or knee ROM differences between groups (p < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LUKA is a valid and definitive option for patients with lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, with a survival rate of > 95% at 5-years follow-up. Clinical-functional outcomes are the same, irrespective of the tibial component used.

In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty during High Flexion Activities

Mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has high conformity between the femoral articular surface and the meniscal bearing; therefore, the surface and subsurface contact stress is reduced. Additionally, the survival rate is high. However, the in vivo kinematics of MB UKA knees during high-flexion activities of daily living remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate in vivo the three-dimensional kinematics of MB UKA knees during high-flexion activities of daily living. A total of 17 knees of 17 patients who could achieve kneeling after MB UKA were examined. Under fluoroscopy, each patient performed squatting and kneeling motions. To estimate the spatial position and orientation of the knee, a two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used. We evaluated the femoral rotation and varus-valgus angle relative to the tibia and the anteroposterior translation of the medial sulcus (medial side) and lateral epicondyle (lateral side) of the femur on the plane perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis in each flexion angle. From 130° to 140° of flexion, the femoral external rotation during squatting was significantly smaller than that during kneeling. Additionally, the medial side of the femur during squatting was significantly more posteriorly located compared with that during kneeling. There was no significant difference between squatting and kneeling in terms of the lateral side of the femur and the varus-valgus position in each flexion angle. At high flexion angle, the kinematics of MB UKA knees may differ depending on the performance.

Unicompartmental knee replacement: controversies and technical considerations

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is one of the effective interventions for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, it has multiple advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including reduced intraoperative blood loss, decreased risk of transfusion, and faster recovery. This study aimed to discuss critical technical considerations regarding UKR and some of the controversies and updates.

METHODS

We conducted a review to provide an overview of the controversies and technical considerations about UKR in several aspects. Only peer-reviewed articles were included, up to December 2023 using PubMed, Google Scholar, ERIC, and Cochrane database for systematic reviews databases.

RESULT

UKR is associated with superior patient-reported clinical and functional outcomes, as well as shorter hospital stays, fewer postoperative complications, and revealed favorable outcomes in patients' return to sport. The choice between mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses depends, in part, on the surgeon's preference. The mobile-bearing UKR is a less constrained prosthesis and can potentially result in less wear, but it is more technically demanding. While no significant difference between mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing prostheses, cementless is superior to cemented design. Furthermore, UKR can be a good alternative for high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and still can be considered after a failed HTO. Lastly, recent reviews have shown a revision rate comparable to that of TKA. This is probably influenced by Improved comprehension of the best indications, patient selection criteria, as well as of the design, materials, and technological advances.

CONCLUSION

UKR treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis is secure and effective. Based on clinical and functional outcomes, decreased morbidity and mortality, and cost-effectiveness, long-term studies suggest that UKR is superior to TKA. Further investigation in this area is warranted.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: does the type of tibial component selected influence implant survival?

INTRODUCTION

Few information has been published on the survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and fixed-bearing tibial components. The aim of this study is to analyze if UKA survival varies according to UKA model used and to analyze the possible risk factors for UKA revision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study analyzing 301 UKAs (ACCURIS, all-polyethylene tibial component, 152; Triathlon PKR, metal-backed tibial component, 149) was performed. Demographic parameters as well as implant survival and cause of prosthetic revision were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the log-rank test and the Cox multiple regression were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 8.1 ± 3.08-years. Average age was 68.1 ± 8.6-years; 70.4% of subjects were women. The ACCURIS UKA group had a UKA revision rate higher compared to the Triathlon PKR group (16/152, 10.6% vs 5/149, 3.4%, respectively; p < 0.001). The main cause of prosthetic revision was aseptic loosening (5/21, 23.8%). All aseptic loosening cases and tibial component collapse were reported with the ACCURIS UKA group. Overall UKA survival was 98.01% (95% CI 95.62-99.1) at 1-year, 94.27% (95% CI 90.95-96.4) at 5-years and 92.38% (95% CI 88.48-94.99) at 10-years' follow-up. There were no differences in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves regarding operated side or affected tibiofemoral compartment (log-rank test = 0.614 and 0.763, respectively). However, Kaplan-Meier survival curve according to UKA model used was different (log-rank test = 0.033). The metal-backed component appeared to be a protector factor for UKA revision when adjusted for age, sex, operated side, and affected tibiofemoral compartment (Hazard Ratio 0.32, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Fixed-bearing UKAs showed excellent mid- and long-term survival rates. Aseptic loosening is the main cause of implant failure. PKR group (metal-backed component) seem to be a protector factor to UKA revision when it was compared with ACCURIS UKA group (all-polyethylene tibial component).

Application strategy of finite element analysis in artificial knee arthroplasty

Artificial knee arthroplasty, as the most effective method for the treatment of end-stage joint diseases such as knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, is widely used in the field of joint surgery. At present, Finite element analysis (FEA) has been widely used in artificial knee replacement biomechanical research. This review presents the current hotspots for the application of FEA in the field of artificial knee replacement by reviewing the existing research literature and, by comparison, summarizes guidance and recommendations for artificial knee replacement surgery. We believe that lower contact stress can produce less wear and complications when components move against each other, in the process of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), mobile-bearing prostheses reduce the contact surface stress of the tibial-femoral joint compared with fixed-bearing prostheses, thus reducing the wear of the polyethylene insert. Compared with mechanical alignment, kinematic alignment reduces the maximum stress and maximum strain of the femoral component and polyethylene insert in TKA, and the lower stress reduces the wear of the joint contact surface and prolongs the life of the prosthesis. In the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the femoral and tibial components of mobile-bearing prostheses have better conformity, which can reduce the wear of the components, while local stress concentration caused by excessive overconformity of fixed-bearing prostheses should be avoided in UKA to prevent accelerated wear of the components, the mobile-bearing prosthesis maintained in the coronal position from 4° varus to 4° valgus and the fixed-bearing prosthesis implanted in the neutral position (0°) are recommended. In revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA), the stem implant design should maintain the best balance between preserving bone and reducing stress around the prosthesis after implantation. Compared with cemented stems, cementless press-fit femoral stems show higher fretting, for tibial plateau bone defects, porous metal blocks are more effective in stress dispersion. Finally, compared with traditional mechanical research methods, FEA methods can yield relatively accurate simulations, which could compensate for the deficiencies of traditional mechanics in knee joint research. Thus, FEA has great potential for applications in the field of medicine.

Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Restores Native Knee Kinematics During Activities of Daily Living: A Pilot Study

The ability of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to restore native knee kinematics during activities of daily living remains unclear. The objectives of this prospective study were to identify changes in knee kinematics after medial UKA (mUKA) and to determine if mUKA restores native knee kinematics during activities of daily living. We hypothesized that kinematics are different between the mUKA knee and contralateral knee before surgery, that mUKA restores native knee kinematics, and that mUKA does not affect lateral compartment dynamic joint space. Nine participants performed walking, chair rise, stair ascent and stair descent within a biplane radiography system before and after mUKA. Bilateral knee kinematics were determined for each activity using a validated tracking process that matched subject-specific bones and implants to the biplane radiographs. Compared to contralateral knee, the pre-UKA knee was more adducted (p ≤ 0.019), and more laterally translated (p ≤ 0.008) during all four activities. Additionally, compared to contralateral knee, pre-UKA knee was less internally rotated (p ≤ 0.044) during chair rise and stair ascent. Lateral compartment dynamic joint space did not change during any activity from pre to post mUKA. Our results indicate that mUKA generally restores native kinematics during activities of daily living without altering lateral compartment dynamic joint space.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Risk-adjusted Comparison of 30-day Outcomes Using National Data From 2014 to 2018

Background

When clinically indicated, the choice of performing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) vs a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is dictated by patient and surgeon preferences. Increased understanding of surgical morbidity may enhance this shared decision-making process. This study compared 30-day risk-adjusted outcomes in TKA vs UKA using a national database.

Methods

We analyzed data from the National Safety and Quality Improvement Program database, for patients who received TKA or UKA between 2014-2018. The main outcomes were blood transfusion, operation time, length of stay, major complication, minor complication, unplanned reoperation, and readmission. Comparisons of odds of the outcomes of interest between TKA and UKA patients were analyzed using multivariate regression models accounting for confounders.

Results

We identified 274,411 eligible patients, of whom 265,519 (96.7%) underwent TKA, while 8892 (3.3%) underwent UKA. Risk-adjusted models that compared perioperative and postoperative outcomes of TKA and UKA showed that the odds of complications such as blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 19.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.19-47.60), major (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI: 1.27-2.77) and minor complications (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI: 1.14-1.79), and readmission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI: 1.16-1.72) were significantly higher among patients who received TKA than among those who received UKA. In addition, operation time (aOR, 7.72; 95% CI: 6.72-8.72) and hospital length of stay (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05-1.17) were also higher among the TKA recipients compared to those who received UKA.

Conclusions

UKA is associated with lower rates of adverse perioperative outcomes compared to TKA. Clinical indications and surgical morbidity should be considered in the shared-decision process

Mobile bearing versus fixed bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement: an independent two center matched-pairs analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcome between patients following fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) for antero-medial knee osteoarthrosis (OA) at two independent orthopedic centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Matched-pairs were built between 35 patients receiving FB-UKR and 52 patients following MB-UKR regarding age at time of surgery, body mass index (BMI) and range of motion (ROM) preoperatively. Clinical and functional outcome was measured postoperatively by the American Knee Society Score (AKSS-O/AKSS-F), ROM, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) as well as the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

The average treatment effect of the treated (ATT) after propensity score matching showed a significantly superior ROM in patients following MB-UKR (FB: 118°, MB: 124°). All remaining parameters had no statistically significant differences between both groups involving TAS, AKSS and SF-36.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that MB-UKR can provide a greater ROM compared to FB-UKR on comparable patients. The authors believe that both designs are suitable for adequate improvement of clinical outcome and ROM for patients suffering from antero-medial osteoarthrosis of the knee joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.

A Morphometric Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Can Reproduce Normal Knee Kinematics. An In Vitro Robotic Evaluation

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Evaluation of Knee Kinematics and Moments during Active Deep Flexion Activity after Oxford Mobile-Bearing Medial UKA-A Two-Year Follow-Up Study

Few studies have assessed knee range of motion (ROM) and moments of patients with mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB UKA) during active deep flexion activities. We analyze knee kinematic and kinetic parameters during postoperative squatting-standing activity, aiming to evaluate the efficacy of MB UKA and postoperative rehabilitation progress. This was a clinical cohort study. We followed up with 37 patients diagnosed with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) with primary UKA. After screening 31 patients were recruited to take gait tests. Squatting-standing activities were performed under the test of 10-camera motion analysis system and force plates preoperatively at different stages after UKA (12, 18, and 24 months). The average duration of follow-up was 24.4 months (from 22.8 to 26.7 months). Hip-knee-ankle angle improved significantly compared with pre-UKA as well as scores of American Knee Society Score, numeric rating scale, ORS, and Western Ontario and McMasters. University Osteoarthritis Index. About 83.6% (31/37) of follow-up patients completed squatting-standing activity independently. At 1-year follow-up, peak varus angle (20.6 ± 2.8 degrees), internal rotation angle (13.6 ± 1.8 degrees), extensor moment (1.44 ± 0.04N*m/kg), and internal rotator moment (0.02 ± 0.005N*m/kg) of UKA knees were inferior to contralateral knees. Peak adductor moment (0.76 ± 0.05N*m/kg) was superior to contralateral knees. At 2-year follow-up, peak flexion angle (125.0 ± 2.8 degrees) showed a growing trend meanwhile extensor (1.70 ± 0.03N*m/kg) and adductor (0.68 ± 0.06 N*m/kg) moment closely resembled those of the contralateral knee. MB UKA could alleviate the affected knee mainly in flexion-extension ROM and moment meanwhile did not affect the biomechanical indicators of healthy limbs. OA knees in the early postoperative period showed decreased extensor moment and increased adductor moment during active deep flexion activity. Better ROM and relatively more natural extensor and adductor moment of UKA knee with rehabilitation time increasing may predict ideal rehabilitation outcome in the medium or longer term.

Evaluation of Safety and Medium-Term Functional Outcomes of a Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Ultra-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo safety of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with sequentially annealed cross-linked polyethylene by evaluating reoperation rate, in particular those related to excessive polyethylene wear or breakage. The secondary objective was to examine functional outcomes via standardized questionnaires. This was a 5-year institutional review board-approved prospective single-surgeon case series of the first 152 consecutive patients with symptomatic medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis implanted with a partial knee replacement between May 2010 and December 2014. Study participants were asked to complete the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthrtis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires at preoperation and 2 to 5 years postoperation. Major complications and all reoperations were recorded and we produced Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves with the end point of revision to TKA. Pre- and postoperative differences for KOOS and WOMAC were evaluated by paired t-tests. The median length of follow-up was 7.2 (0-9.72) years. Seven patients required revision surgery to TKA (4.9% of patients): four with progression of arthritis in other compartments, two for infection, and one for loosening of the femoral component and subsequent progression of pain. There were no failures of polyethylene. Survival of cohort was 99.3 and 97.9% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Patients significantly improved (p-value < 0.001) between preoperative assessment and at 2 years, with no decline at 5 years postoperation. These preliminary midterm results with this fixed-bearing design and cross-linked polyethylene were encouraging with no catastrophic failures of polyethylene. Patient reported outcomes were significantly improved and revision rates were acceptable and lower than registry reported results.

Mobile Bearing versus Fixed Bearing for Unicompartmental Arthroplasty in Monocompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Whether mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performs better than fixed-bearing (FB) implants in patients with monocompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) still remains unclear. Therefore, a meta-analysis comparing MB versus FB for UKA was conducted to investigate the possible advantages of MB versus FB in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), and complications. We hypothesised that the MB design performs better than FB. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. In December 2021, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed, with no time constraints. All the clinical investigations comparing MB versus FB bearing for UKA were accessed. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were considered. Studies reporting data on revision settings were excluded, as were those combining unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. Results: Data from 25 studies (4696 patients) were collected; 58% (2724 of 4696 patients) were women. The mean length of follow-up was 45.8 ± 43.2. The mean age of the patients was 65.0 ± 5.6 years. No difference was found in range of motion (p = 0.05), Knee Scoring System (p = 0.9), function subscale (p = 0.2), and Oxford Knee Score (p = 0.4). No difference was found in the rate of revision (p = 0.2), aseptic loosening (p = 0.9), deep infections (p = 0.99), fractures (p = 0.6), and further extension of OA to the contralateral joint compartment (p = 0.2). Conclusion: The present meta-analysis failed to identify the possible superiority of the MB implants over the FB for UKA in patients with monocompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Long observational investigations are required to evaluate possible long-term complications and implant survivorship. These results should be interpreted within the limitations of the present study.

St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up

PURPOSE

The peri-operative and short-term benefits of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are well supported in the literature. However, there remains concern regarding the higher revision rate when compared with total knee replacement. This manuscript reports the functional outcome and survivorship of a large series of fixed bearing, medial unicompartmental replacements (St Georg Sled), with a minimum of 20 years follow-up.

METHODS

Between 1974 and 1994, 399 patients (496 knees) underwent a medial fixed-bearing UKA. Prospective data were collected pre-operatively and at regular intervals post-operatively using the Bristol Knee Score (BKS), Oxford Knee (OKS) and Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) scores. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine survivorship, with revision or need for revision as end point, and differences assessed using Mantel-Cox log rank test.

RESULTS

Functional knee scores improved post-operatively, but demonstrated a slight decline from 10 years of follow-up onwards. Survivorship is estimated as 86% at 10 years, 80% at 15 years, and 78% at 20 years. Sixty knees were revised, with progression of disease in another compartment the commonest reason. Eighty eight percent were revised using a primary prosthesis. For patients over the age of 65 years at the time of index procedure, 93% died with a functioning prosthesis in situ.

CONCLUSION

Medial UKA demonstrates good long-term function and survivorship, and represents an excellent surgical option for patients aged over 65 years of age, where few patients will require a revision procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis in the medial patellar facet due to lateral femoral placement after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A case report

Introduction and importance

Factors that affect patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain unclear. We report a case in which the lateral placement of the femoral component resulted in rapidly progressive OA in the medial patellar facet.

Case presentation

The patient was an 84-year-old woman who had increased pain in the left knee due to varus knee OA for 1 year and underwent medial UKA. One month after the surgery, the patient complained of limited knee flexion of 90° with anterior knee pain, and around 7-mm lateral placement of the femoral component was observed on a postoperative radiograph and computed tomography scan. Six months after the surgery, rapidly progressive OA with subchondral bone depression in the medial facet was observed and this has been ongoing till the last follow-up of 3 years. The knee flexion is limited 105° now, and the patient complains of quadriceps weakness with anterior knee pain when stair-climbing and standing up from a chair.

Clinical discussion

Lateral placement of the femoral component in medial UKA may cause progressive PF OA with limited knee flexion and anterior knee pain, which could be attributed to impingement between the femoral component and the medial patellar facet.

Conclusion

Surgeons should be careful regarding the lateral placement to prevent symptomatic PF OA from occurring after medial UKA.

•

Factors that affect patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) after UKA have been rarely reported.

•

An 84-year-old woman with rapidly progressive symptomatic PF OA after medial UKA is presented.

•

Impingement between the femoral component placed laterally and the medial patellar facet seems attributable to the PF OA.

•

The lateral placement would be one of risk factors for PF OA after medial UKA.

Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report and compare the long-term revision rate, revision indications and patient reported outcome measures of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR).

METHODS

Databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials were searched to identify all UKR studies reporting the ≥ 10 year clinical outcomes. Revision rates per 100 component years [% per annum (% pa)] were calculated by fixation type and then, subgroup analyses for fixed and mobile bearing UKRs were performed. Mechanisms of failure and patient reported outcome measures are reported.

RESULTS

25 studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 10,736 UKRs, in which there were 8790 cemented and 1946 cementless knee replacements. The revision rate was 0.73% pa (CI 0.66-0.80) and 0.45% pa (CI 0.34-0.58) per 100 component years, respectively, with the cementless having a significantly (p < 0.001) lower overall revision rate. Therefore, based on these studies, the expected 10-year survival of cementless UKR would be 95.5% and cemented 92.7%. Subgroup analysis revealed this difference remained significant for the Oxford UKR (0.37% pa vs 0.77% pa, p < 0.001), but for non-Oxford UKRs there were no significant differences in revision rates of cemented and cementless UKRs (0.57% pa vs 0.69% pa, p = 0.41). Mobile bearing UKRs had significantly lower revision rates than fixed bearing UKRs in cementless (p = 0.001), but not cemented groups (p = 0.13). Overall the revision rates for aseptic loosening and disease progression were significantly lower (p = 0.02 and p = 0.009 respectively) in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (0.06 vs 0.13% pa and 0.10 vs 0.21% pa respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless fixation had reduced long-term revision rates compared to cemented for the Oxford UKR. For the non-Oxford UKRs, the revision rates of cementless and cemented fixation types were equivalent. Therefore, cementless UKRs offer at least equivalent if not lower revision rates compared to cemented UKRs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Component positioning of the first 300 mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties

The Oxford® Partial Knee has excellent long-term survivorship but high surgical times indicate a learn curve. This retrospective review included a radiographic evaluation of component placement of the initial 300 procedures following conversion from fixed bearing implant use. The anteroposterior and sagittal femoral angles were considered inaccurate in 1.7% and 3.9% of cases, respectively. The anteroposterior and sagittal tibial angles were considered inaccurate in 18.7% and 6.0% of cases, respectively. Overall, a learning curve appears to be present regarding the anteroposterior tibial component angle, with the greatest percentage of inaccuracies occurring within the initial 20 cases.

Intraoperative rotational kinematics and its influence on postoperative clinical outcomes differ according to age in Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty

Background

Although Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is used in patients of wide age ranges, there is no clear information regarding the age differences in terms of intraoperative femorotibial rotational kinematics and its influence on clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the age differences in terms of intraoperative rotational kinematics and postoperative clinical outcomes and to analyze their relationship with classification according to the age group.

Methods

We investigated 111 knees of patients who underwent Oxford UKA using a navigation system and divided them into two groups: elderly (aged ≥75 years; 48 knees) and nonelderly (aged < 75 years; 63 knees). Intraoperative tibial internal rotational angles relative to the femur during passive knee flexion were measured using a navigation system, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using knee range of motion, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Knee Society Functional Score at 2 years postoperatively. The relationships between intraoperative tibiofemoral rotational angles and clinical outcomes were also evaluated in the two groups.

Results

The intraoperative tibial internal rotational angle relative to the femur during knee flexion was significantly larger in the nonelderly group (13.5°) than in the elderly group (9.0°). The intraoperative tibial internal rotational angle showed a positive correlation with the pain subscale of KOOS only in the nonelderly group.

Conclusion

Intraoperative rotational kinematics and its influence on clinical outcomes were different between elderly and nonelderly patients, and the tibial internal rotational angle could be a more important factor for successful UKA in nonelderly patients.

A Comparison of Mobile- and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties in the Treatment of Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 1,861 Patients

Many studies have compared mobile-bearing (MB) and fixed-bearing (FB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) in patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA). The present systematic review and meta-analysis examined the differences in the clinical and radiological outcomes of MB UKA and FB UKA. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, as well as Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that compared MB UKA and FB UKA were included. The weighted mean difference in the knee scores and range of motion (ROM) as well as the summary odds ratio of postoperative mechanical axis alignment, radiolucency, revision rate, and complications were calculated in the MB UKA and FB UKA groups. Finally, 2 RCTs and 11 cohort studies that involved 1,861 patients (1,996 knees) were included. The FB UKA group showed better postoperative Knee Society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and ROM than the MB UKA group. However, the MB UKA group had more knees with a neutral limb alignment and a lower incidence of polyethylene wear than the FB UKA group. No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to radiolucency, revision rate, and complications, such as arthritis progression, aseptic loosening, and postoperative pain. This meta-analysis has demonstrated that both prostheses provided excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship in patients with unicompartmental knee OA. The MB UKA group achieved the expected postoperative neutral limb alignment as compared with the FB UKA group, while the FB UKA group showed higher knee scores and superior ROM than the MB UKA group. Limited evidence is currently available; therefore, the results of our meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution.

[Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory]

BACKGROUND

A higher patient satisfaction stands in contrast to higher revision rates of unicondylar knee joint endoprosthetics (UKE) compared to total knee joint endoprosthetics (TKE). Furthermore, old "dogmas" regarding indications and contraindications persist, which is still reflected in the significantly different case numbers.

AIM

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current literature regarding 1. indication and contraindication (BMI, age, sport, arthrosis of other compartments, ligament status) and 2. the "eternal rival" fixed or mobile bearing for UKE.

RESULTS

The choice of the right patient remains essential, even if all the old "dogmas" of contraindications have been relativized or even outdated. Arthroses of the contralateral (in medial UKE correspondingly lateral) compartment and advanced arthroses of the lateral patella facet remain the only persistent contraindications. In contrast, a high BMI, age, chondrocalcinosis, medial patella facet and a defective (but particularly functionally stable) ACL are not contraindications; however, severe obesity is responsible for a significantly higher complication rate and probably a higher rate of loosening. Rather, the experience and thus the number of UKEs of the individual surgeon is decisive for the outcome, to which the discussion about mobile or fixed inlays must also be completely subordinated.

CONCLUSION

The indications for UKE can, therefore, be extended with a clear conscience on the basis of literature, and the current 1:10 UKE:TKE ratio in Germany can be shifted significantly.

Contemporary knee arthroplasty: one fits all or time for diversity?

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has historically been the preferred solution for any type of knee osteoarthritis, independently of the number of compartments involved. In these days of patient-specific medicine, mono-compartmental disease could also be approached with a more individualized treatment, such as partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). Off-the-shelf (OTS) implants are often the compromise of averages and means of a limited series of anatomical parameters retrieved from patients and the pressure of cost control by limited inventory. Personalized medicine requires respect and interest for the individual shape and alignment of each patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Pubmed and Google Scholar search were performed with the following terms: "patient-specific knee" and "arthroplasty" and "custom implant" and "total knee replacement" and "partial knee replacement" and "patellofemoral knee replacement" and "bicompartmental knee replacement". The full text of 90 articles was used to write this narrative review.

RESULTS

Unicondylar, patellofemoral and bicompartmental knee arthroplasty are successful treatment options, which can be considered over TKA for their bone and ligament sparing character and the superior functional outcome that can be obtained with resurfacing procedures. For TKA, where compromises dominate our choices, especially in patients with individual variations of their personal anatomy outside of the standard, a customized implant could be a preferable solution.

CONCLUSION

TKA might not be the only solution for every patient with knee osteoarthritis, if personalized medicine wants to be offered. Patient-specific mono-compartmental resurfacing solutions, such as partial knee arthroplasty, can be part of the treatment options proposed by the expert surgeon. Customized implants and personalized alignment options have the potential to further improve clinical outcome by identifying the individual morphotype and respecting the diversity of the surgical population.

One stage bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement: Similar early clinical outcome with shorter rehabilitation and better resources utilization compared with two stage

Introduction:

There are a lot of debates on the advantages and safety profile of one stage bilateral knee arthroplasty. Most of the studies focus on total knee replacement, and it may not be applied directly to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). We would like to compare the early results of one and two stage bilateral UKR in our center.

Methods:

This is a retrospective review of all the bilateral medial UKR done in our center in 2018–2019. Patients’ demographic data, operative time, postoperative blood, length of stay (LOS) and complications were recorded. The number of admissions, pre-operative assessment sessions (PAS), and weeks of post-operative physiotherapy were analyzed. Clinical outcome was measured by Knee society knee score and range of motion (ROM).

Results:

Our center performed 97 UKR in 2018–2019, with 50 UKR performed in 25 patients, among which 16 received one stage while 9 received two stage bilateral UKR. Both groups had similar mean age, BMI, sex ratio, ASA grading, pre-operative knee score and ROM. Patient in the one stage group required only 1 PAS/admission/operation to treat both knees with a mean LOS of 7.3 days and 7.8 weeks of physiotherapy, while those in the two stage group required 2 PAS/admissions/operations with a mean cumulative LOS of 9.8 days and 14.1 weeks of physiotherapy. The mean cumulative operative time was similar for both groups but the one stage group only required 1 operative session. There was no difference in blood loss and there was no transfusion or complication. The post-operative knee score and ROM at 3 and 6 months were similar for both groups.

Conclusion:

In suitable patients with bilateral medial OA knee, one stage bilateral UKR offers simliar early clinical outcome with shorter rehabilitation duration but without increasing complications compared with two stage. Resources can therefore be better utilized.

Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be either a fixed bearing (FB) or a mobile bearing (MB) construct with controversy as to which design is superior. This question is addressed with a systematic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Studies were reviewed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria developed in advance. We compared the differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the FB and MB UKAs. Analyses were performed with the Review Manager and STATA software. A total of 17 studies involving 2612 knees were included. No significant differences were presented between the FB and MB prostheses in clinical and radiological outcomes. However, it was evident that there were differences in the modes and timing of the failures, bearing dislocation led to earlier failures in the MB prosthesis, while the FB prosthesis failed later due to polyethylene wear. There was no evidence of publication bias using the incidence of revisions. There is no significant difference between the FB and MB UKAs; however, there are differences in the modes and timing of failures.

Ten-Year Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Psychological Distress

BACKGROUND

Although the influence of psychological distress on the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty has been described extensively, its effect on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is poorly defined. Furthermore, most studies in arthroplasty literature had short follow-ups of ≤1 year. We investigated the influence of psychological distress on long-term patient-reported outcomes and analyzed the change in mental health after UKA in a cohort with minimum 10 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 269 patients undergoing UKA in 2004-2007 were reviewed. Patients were stratified into those with psychological distress (36-item Short-Form health survey [SF-36] Mental Component Summary [MCS] <50, n = 111) and those without (SF-36 MCS ≥50, n = 158). Clinical outcomes were obtained preoperatively, at 2 years, and 10 years. Multiple regression was used to control for age, gender, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and baseline scores. The rate of expectation fulfillment and satisfaction was compared.

RESULTS

Psychologically distressed patients had poorer Knee Society Knee Score, Function Score, Oxford Knee Score, and SF-36 Physical Component Summary preoperatively, at 2 years, and 10 years. However, an equal proportion in each group attained the minimal clinically important difference for each score. Distressed patients had a comparable rate of satisfaction (91% vs 95%, P = .136) but lower fulfillment of expectations (89% vs 95%, P = .048). The percentage of distressed patients declined from 41% to 35% at follow-up. The mean SF-36 MCS improved by 6.9 points.

CONCLUSION

Although psychologically distressed patients had relatively greater pain and poorer function preoperatively and up to 10 years after UKA, a similar proportion of them experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcomes.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone- and ligament-sparing alternative to total knee arthroplasty in the patients with end-stage single-compartment degeneration of the knee. Despite being a successful procedure, the multiple advantages of UKA do not correlate with its usage, most likely due to the concerns regarding prosthesis survivability, patient selection, ideal bearing design, and judicious use of advanced technology among many others. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and summarize the debated literature and discuss the controversies as “Ten Enigmas of UKA.”

Comparison of implant position and joint awareness between fixed- and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a minimum of five year follow-up study

PURPOSE

To compare the implant position and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) regarding joint awareness using the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) following between fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with a minimum of five years' follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen consecutive UKAs (58 FB UKAs and 57 MB UKAs) performed were retrospectively evaluated. We compared the radiographic parameters including component positions and relationships as well as lower extremity alignment. Post-operative clinical outcomes were assessed using Knee Society Score (KSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Tegner activity score, and FJS.

RESULTS

The MB UKA group showed more convergent componentry relationship between femoral and tibial components (p < 0.001). The joint line of the MB UKA group was restored significantly better (p < 0.05). In addition, the positioning of femoral and tibial components of the MB UKA group showed less deviation from the weight-bearing line (WBL) (p < 0.05). Although there were no differences in KSS, WOMAC, and Tegner activity scores between the groups, the MB UKA group showed significantly better FJS than did the FB UKA group at five years post-operatively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The MB UKA group had a more convergent componentry relationship, less deviation from WBL, better joint-line restoration, and reduced joint awareness than did the FB UKA group at five years follow-up.

In vivo kinematic comparison before and after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities

BACKGROUND

Many patients who undergo unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have an expectation that their knee flexion would increase following its replacement. Additionally, the survival rate of mobile-bearing UKA (MB-UKA) is high. However, the effect on the patient's kinematics remains unknown. This study aimed to clarify the kinematic effect of MB-UKA knees during high-flexion activities by comparing the in vivo kinematics before and after surgery.

METHODS

A squatting motion was performed under fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane before and after MB-UKA. To estimate the spatial position and orientation of the knee, a two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used. The femoral rotation and varus-valgus angle relative to the tibia and anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral side of the femur on the plane perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis in each flexion angle were evaluated.

RESULTS

Regarding the varus-valgus angle, the preoperative knees indicated a significant varus alignment compared with the postoperative knees from 10° to 60° of flexion. There were no significant differences in the femoral rotation angle, AP translation, and kinematic pathway before and after MB-UKA in the mid-flexion of the range of motion.

CONCLUSION

There were differences between the varus-valgus knee kinematics before and after MB-UKA, from 10 to 60° of flexion, but no difference from midrange of flexion to deep flexion. In addition, the rotational knee kinematics before and after MB-UKA was not significantly different.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: US and Global Perspectives

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a treatment option for anteromedial osteoarthritis. Compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), UKA offers improved knee range of motion, functional recovery and decreased medical complications. Revision rates continue to be higher with UKA compared with TKA. With current UKA implants, there is no significant difference in mobile bearing or fixed bearing, or between cemented and cementless implants. Enabling technology, such as robotic-assisted surgery, has demonstrated improvements in component positioning, but no long-term difference in survival compared with traditional manual instruments.

Comparison of Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have compared fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (FB-UKA) with mobile-bearing UKA (MB-UKA), suggesting that both procedures have good clinical outcomes. However, which treatment is more beneficial for patients is controversial. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the postoperative outcomes, including the revision rate, complications, functional results, range of motion, and femoral-tibial angle, between the 2 procedures.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases starting from August 2017 to May 2018. The publication date of articles was not restricted. Before we submit our contribution, we have re-searched it again. Articles that directly compared the postoperative outcomes of the 2 prosthesis type were included.

RESULTS

A total of 15 comparative studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled data indicated no differences between the 2 operation modes in terms of revision rates, complications, and knee function, but earlier failure occurred more frequently with the MB design.

CONCLUSION

Both the arthroplasty types provided satisfactory clinical results for patients with classic indications. However, MB-UKA tended to fail in early postoperative years whereas fixed-bearing UKA in later postoperative years. Therefore treatment options should be carefully considered for each patient, and surgeons should still use their personal experience when deciding between these options.

Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

With unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) being increasingly performed for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for failed UKA is expected to increase. Our primary aim is to evaluate patients in our tertiary institution who underwent revision of failed UKA to TKA to compare their pre-operative clinical scores (patient-reported outcome measures, PROMs) to those of primary TKA.

METHODS

Retrospective review of our institutional arthroplasty registry between 2001 and 2014 was performed. We identified 70 patients who underwent revision of UKA to TKA. The revision UKA to TKA patients was matched with 140 patients who underwent primary TKA for OA in terms of preoperative demographics, gender, age at time of surgery, body mass index (BMI), primary surgeon, and PROMs. Intra-operative data and postoperative complications or re-revision surgeries performed were reviewed.

RESULTS

In the revision UKA to TKA group, more stems, augments or constrained implants were used compared to primary TKA. A greater proportion of patients with metal-backed UKA revision to TKA required stems, augments or constrained implants as compared to all-polyethylene UKA revision to TKA, but not a significant proportion (P = 0.250). At two years postoperatively, there were no significant differences observed between the groups in terms of patient satisfaction and PROMs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed similar outcomes following revision of failed UKA to TKA and primary TKA. There were significant improvements in PROMs for revision UKA to TKA, which is comparable to that of primary TKA.

Activity Level Does Not Affect Survivorship of Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty at 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Patients are often cautioned against a high level of activity after knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to report on implant survivorship and outcomes of high-activity patients compared with low-activity patients after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

We identified 487 patients (576 knees) who underwent UKA with the Oxford mobile bearing knee (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) with a 5-year minimum follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups: low activity (LA) (University of California Los Angeles ≤6) and high activity (HA) (University of California Los Angeles ≥7). Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, Knee Society scores, complications, and reoperations were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 9 years (range, 4 to 13.1). The HA group had significantly more male patients, were younger, and had higher knee society clinical scores and knee society functional scores preoperatively. The HA group had significantly higher improvements in Knee Society scores and pain postoperatively. Revisions were performed in 8.4% of the LA group and 6.2% of the HA group (P = .43). At our mean of 9-year follow-up, there was 94.0% survival for the HA group and 92.1% for the LA group (P = .6085).

CONCLUSIONS

Highly active patients had no increased risk of revision after UKA with the Oxford mobile bearing knee at 5-year minimum follow-up.

Pre-existing patellofemoral disease does not affect 10-year survivorship in fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess 10-year functional outcome and survivorship analysis of patients with significant radiographic evidence of patellofemoral joint arthritis treated with fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixteen patients (263 knees) that underwent UKA from 2003 to 2005 for a mean of 10.5 ± 2.1 years were prospectively followed up. Preoperative radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint state was assessed according to the Ahlback classification by an independent assessor and radiographically significant patellofemoral disease was defined as grade 2 or more. Patients with significant bone-on-bone contact in the patellofemoral joint were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 263 knees, 222 (84.4%) had normal patellofemoral joint state and 41 (15.6%) radiologically significant patellofemoral disease. At 10 years' follow-up, the normal and patellofemoral groups had similar OKS (20 ± 7 vs 20 ± 8, n.s.) and KSS scores (79 ± 20 vs 81 ± 20, n.s.), respectively. There were 12 revision surgeries in the normal group and the most common indication for revision was progression of contralateral compartment osteoarthritis (6 of 12 cases). There was only one revision in the patellofemoral group and it was due to progression of contralateral compartment osteoarthritis (n.s.). When all secondary surgeries to the operated knee were considered as failures, the 10-year survival rate was 95.1% (CI 95%: 92.2-97.7%).

CONCLUSION

The presence of significant preoperative radiological patellofemoral disease does not affect long-term implant survival and patients have excellent functional outcomes 10 years postoperatively. These patients should not be contraindicated from undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Analysis of Retrieved Unicompartmental Knee Implants and Tissue: Third-Body Wear as a Potential Contributor to Progression of Arthritis to Adjacent Compartments

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of single-compartment osteoarthritis has been associated with polyethylene wear and progression of osteoarthritis into adjacent compartments, leading to revision. In this study, damage and clinical failure modes of retrieved UKA implants were investigated and protein expression profiles between articular cartilage adjacent to UKA and primary osteoarthritic cartilage were compared. Fifty retrieved UKA implants were analyzed for various damage. Records review and radiographic analysis were performed to collect clinical data and implant characteristics. Cartilage harvested from revision UKA and primary total knee arthroplasty surgeries was characterized with a proteome profiling array detecting levels of 36 different cytokines, chemokines, and acute phase inflammatory proteins. Progression of osteoarthritis (n=18, 36%) and component loosening (n=17, 34%) were the most common reasons for revision. Liners exhibited the highest frequency of damage modes. Progression of arthritis positively correlated with radiographic presence of extruded bone cement and burnishing of liner components. A protein-level profile between revision UKA and primary total knee arthroplasty cartilage showed 12 differentially expressed cytokines. Failure of UKA may be secondary to the effects of wear debris particulate migration into the adjacent compartment, suggesting an additional pathway of cartilage damage manifesting as traditional clinical symptoms. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):149-157.].

Age and Outcomes of Medial Meniscal-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

National joint registries report increasing revision rates with decreasing patient age for all types of joint arthroplasty. This study aimed to explore the effect of age on function and revision risk in patients undergoing medial meniscal-bearing UKA.

METHODS

A prospectively followed cohort of 1000 consecutive medial meniscal-bearing UKAs at a designer center was analyzed. All knees were implanted for recommended indications and had mean 10-year follow-up. Patients were grouped by age at surgery (<55, 55 to <65, 65 to <75, 75+). Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) were assessed at 5 and 10 years. Component-time revision incidence rates and Kaplan-Meier implant survival were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean patient age at surgery was 66.6 years (range, 33-88). All age-groups had significant (P < .001) improvement in OKS over time, and at 5 years achieved a median OKS of 44. At 10 years, median OKS, from youngest group to eldest, were 44, 45, 42, and 39, with the eldest group having a significantly lower OKS (P < .01). Ten-year implant survival rates were 97%, 94%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, and was not significantly associated with age at UKA.

CONCLUSION

Medial meniscal-bearing UKA provides good functional outcomes in all age-groups; however, in older patients (75+), the functional outcome deteriorated at 10 years presumably due to deteriorating health. Contrary to registry observations, the revision rate was not higher in younger patients. These results suggest that, with correct indications, patient age should not be considered a contraindication to medial meniscal-bearing UKA.

A Comparison of Mobile and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The long-term survivorship and functional outcomes of the mobile-bearing (MB) compared to the fixed-bearing (FB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implant design remain a topic of debate. The aim of the current study was to compare the survivorship and functional outcomes of MB and FB UKA at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 106 consecutive medial UKAs (89 patients) from our institution with a minimum 10-year follow-up. The 38 MB and 68 FB knees had follow-up of 14.2 years (12.9-15.5) and 11.5 years (10.2-15.1), respectively. Validated patient-reported outcomes and radiographs were evaluated as were etiology, timing, and complexity of revision. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival was calculated with revision to total knee arthroplasty as the end point.

RESULTS

The 10-year survival was 82.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65.8-91.9) for MB and 90.9% (95% CI 79.4-96.2) for FB UKA (P = .102), and 88.0% (95% CI 79.3-93.2) for the entire cohort. Patient outcomes were similar between groups, as were timing and etiologies for revision to total knee arthroplasty. One-third of revisions required either stems or tibial augments, and of these, all were of MB design.

CONCLUSION

Survival and functional outcomes were similar between MB and FB designs. One-third of revisions required either stems or augments, all were of MB design.

How does the inclination of the tibial component matter? A three-dimensional finite element analysis of medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using Oxford mobile-bearing prosthesis is performed in the treatment of medial compartmental arthritis of the knee. However, little is known about the stress distributions for mobile-bearing UKA on the medial tibial plateau.

METHODS

In this study, the stresses on the coronal plane were calculated in a three-dimensional model of the proximal tibia. The features of the stress distribution were investigated when the tibial tray was placed in 15°, 10°, six degrees, and three degrees varus, neutral (0°), and in three degrees, six degrees, 10°, and 15° valgus on the coronal plane of the medial plateau.

RESULTS

The peak von Mises stress was found on the cortex below the medial plateau while the stresses of cortical bone increased gradually as the inclination of the tibial tray was changed from varus to valgus. The amount of peak stress was almost the same as that in the normal knee model when the tibial tray was placed in six degrees valgus and consistently lower in varus inclination than in the normal knee model. Conversely, the peak stress of soft bone was found at the bottom of the slot.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the inclination of the tibial component affects stress distribution in the proximal tibia after UKA. Slight varus inclination of the mobile-bearing tibial component is acceptable as it lowers the peak stress on the medial cortex. Additionally, placing the tibial tray in slight varus avoids a rise in stress between the tip of the keel and the medial tibial cortex.

The 180° spin of meniscal bearing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mobile-bearing Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been widely used and has produced good results in the treatment of medial compartmental osteoarthritis. But it is associated with the potential risk of meniscal bearing dislocation. Symptoms caused by most meniscal bearing dislocations include acute pain, knee swelling, and locking. We report two unusual cases of meniscal bearing spinning of 180° without remarkable symptoms, which would have been easily missed if we had not watched carefully. Therefore, if there is sudden locking, pain, swelling, or a slight locking history, the possibility of meniscal bearing spin out as well as meniscal bearing dislocation should be considered and the direction of meniscal bearing markers should be confirmed, especially on lateral radiographs.

Assessment of patient functional performance in different knee arthroplasty designs during unconstrained squat

Background

In this paper, squat named by Authors unconstrained because performed without constrains related to feet position, speed, knee maximum angle to be reached, was tested as motor task revealing differences in functional performance after knee arthroplasty. It involves large joints ranges of motion, does not compromise joint safety and requires accurate control strategies to maintain balance.

Methods

Motion capture techniques were used to study squat on a healthy control group (CTR) and on three groups, each characterised by a specific knee arthroplasty design: a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), a Mobile Bearing and a Fixed Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (respectively MBUA and FBUA). Squat was analysed during descent, maintenance and ascent phase and described by speed, angular kinematics of lower and upper body, the Center of Pressure (CoP) trajectory and muscle activation timing of quadriceps and biceps femoris.

Results

Compared to CTR, for TKA and MBUA knee maximum flexion was lower, vertical speed during descent and ascent reduced and the duration of whole movement was longer. CoP mean distance was higher for all arthroplasty groups during descent as higher was, CoP mean velocity for MBUA and TKA during ascent and descent.

Conclusions

Unconstrained squat is able to reveal differences in the functional performance among control and arthroplasty groups and between different arthroplasty designs. Considering the similarity index calculated for the variables showing statistically significance, FBUA performance appears to be closest to that of the CTR group.

Level of evidence

III a.

Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. However, certain aspects of the procedure are still debated. These areas of discussion include patient selection criteria, implant design and the discrepancy in survival rates between national registries and independent case series. These may contribute in limiting the more widespread acceptance of unicompartmental knee replacement. The aim of this paper is to review the up-to-date evidence on UKR and discuss the most relevant controversies regarding this procedure.

Early comparative outcomes of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in severely obese patients

BACKGROUND

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may have advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of obesity. There has been no direct comparison between the two cohorts. This study compares outcomes and complications of severely obese patients undergoing medial UKA versus TKA.

METHODS

Six hundred and fifty medial UKA and 1300 TKA were performed in patients with BMI >35kg/m² (mean 41kg/m²) between 2007 and 2012. Pre- and postoperative ROM, Knee Society scores, perioperative factors, complications and reoperations were compared.

RESULTS

UKA patients had higher preoperative ROM, and Knee Society pain (KSP), functional (KSF), and clinical (KSC) scores (p<0.001, p=0.0008, p=0.0003, p=0.051 respectively). Mean tourniquet times, operative times, and lengths of stay were lower after UKA. Four TKA patients required transfusion. Mean follow-up was 2.3years. The frequency of manipulation under anesthesia was higher in TKA patients (p<0.001), while the rate of component revision was similar between the two groups (1.2% vs. 1.7%, p=0.328). Frequency of deep infection was lower in the UKA group (p=0.016). Postoperative KSF, change in KSF, and ROM were higher (p<0.0001) after UKA, but KSP and KSC were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

Severely obese patients who underwent medial UKA demonstrated equal survivorship with substantially fewer reoperations, reduced deep infection, and less perioperative complications at short term follow-up. Severely obese patients had improved KSF scores and maintenance of ROM after UKA compared with TKA.

Predictors of Midterm Outcomes after Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Asians

Background

This study was designed to evaluate predictors of good outcomes following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in Asian patients.

Methods

Registry data of patients who underwent primary unilateral medial UKA from 2006 to 2011 were collected. Outcomes studied were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Physical Component Score (PCS) of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. These outcome scores were collected prospectively, pre- and postoperatively up to 5 years. Good outcome was defined as an overall improvement in score greater than or equal to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The MCID for the OKS was 5 while the MCID for the PCS was 10. Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of good outcomes following medial UKA.

Results

Primary medial UKA was performed in 1,075 patients. Higher (poorer) preoperative OKS (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; p < 0.001), lower (poorer) preoperative PCS (OR, 1.08; p < 0.001), lower (poorer) preoperative Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS; OR, 1.02; p < 0.001) and higher (better) preoperative SF-36 Mental Component Score (MCS; OR, 1.02; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of good outcomes.

Conclusions

Patients with poorer OKS, PCS and KSKS and better SF-36 MCS preoperatively tended to achieve good outcomes by the MCID criterion at 5 years following the index surgery.

Kinematics of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to native: results from an in vitro study

INTRODUCTION

Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) closely replicates native knee kinematics. As few studies have assessed kinematics following mobile-bearing (MB) UKA, the current study aimed to investigate whether MB UKA preserves natural knee kinematics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen full-leg cadaver specimens were prepared and mounted in a kinematic rig that allowed all degrees of freedom at the knee. Three motion patterns, passive flexion-extension (0°-110° flexion), open-chain extension (5°-70° flexion) and squatting (30°-100° flexion), were performed pre- and post-implantation of a medial MB UKA and compared in terms of rotational and translational knee joint kinematics in the different anatomical planes, respectively.

RESULTS

In terms of frontal plane rotational kinematics, MB UKA specimens were in a more valgus orientation for all motion patterns. In the axial plane, internal rotation of the tibia before and after UKA was consistent, regardless of motion task, with no significant differences. In terms of frontal plane, i.e., inferior-superior, translations, the FMCC was significantly higher in UKA knees in all flexion angles and motor tasks, except in early flexion during passive motion. In terms of axial plane, i.e., anteroposterior (AP), translations, during open-chain activities, the femoral medial condyle center (FMCC) tended to be more posterior following UKA relative to the native knee in mid-flexion and above. AP excursions of the FMCC were small in all tested motions, however. There was substantial AP translation of the femoral lateral condyle center during passive motion before and after UKA, which was significantly different for flexion angles > 38°.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study data demonstrate that the kinematics of the unloaded knee following MB UKA closely resemble those of the native knee while relative medial overstuffing with UKA will result in the joint being more valgus. However, replacing the conforming and rigidly fixed medial meniscus with a mobile inlay may successfully prevent aberrant posterior translation of the medial femoral compartment during passive motion and squatting motion.

The Interaction of Caseload and Usage in Determining Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are variable and influenced by caseload (UKA/y) and usage (percentage of knee arthroplasty that are UKA), which relates to indications. This meta-analysis assesses the relative importance of these factors.

METHODS

MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Web of Science (ISI) were searched for consecutive series of cemented Phase 3 Oxford medial UKA. The primary outcome was revision rate/100 observed component years (% pa) with subgroup analysis based on caseload and usage.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies (12,520 knees) with an annual revision-rate ranging from 0% to 4.35% pa, mean 1.21% pa (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.47), were identified. In series with mean follow-up of 10-years, the revision-rate was 0.63% pa (95% CI, 0.46-0.83), equating to a 94% (95% CI, 92%-95%) 10-year survival. Aseptic loosening, lateral arthritis, bearing dislocation, and unexplained pain were the predominant failure mechanisms with revision for patellofemoral problems and polyethylene wear exceedingly rare. The lowest revision-rates were achieved with caseload >24 UKA/y (0.88% pa; 95% CI, 0.63-1.61) and usage >30% (0.69% pa; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90). Usage was more important than caseload; with high usage (≥20%), the revision-rate was low, whether the caseload was high (>12 UKA/y) or low (≤12 UKA/y; (0.94% pa; 95% CI, 0.69-1.23 and 0.85% pa; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08), respectively); with low usage (<20%), the revision-rate was high, whether the caseload was high or low (1.58% pa; 95% CI, 0.57-3.05 and 1.76% pa; 95% CI, 1.21-2.41, respectively).

CONCLUSION

To achieve optimum results, surgeons, whether high or low caseload, should adhere to the recommended indications such that ≥20%, or ideally >30% of their knee arthroplasties are UKA. If they do this, then they can expect to achieve results similar to those of the long-term series, which all had high usage (>20%) and an average 10-year survival of 94%.

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: Key concepts

The concept of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been described as early as 1950s following the introduction of the MacIntosh and McKeever hemiarthroplasty. With improvements in implant design, patient selection, and surgical technique, there has been an increase in utilization of UKA as a less-invasive alternative to total joint arthroplasty for the treatment of localized symptomatic osteoarthritis. The purpose of this review article is to highlight five trending concepts in UKA based on current evidence: bearing design, fixation technique, medial vs. lateral UKA, implant survivorship, and revision surgery.

Non-Sagittal Knee Joint Kinematics and Kinetics during Gait on Level and Sloped Grounds with Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

After knee arthroplasty (KA) surgery, patients experience abnormal kinematics and kinetics during numerous activities of daily living. Biomechanical investigations have focused primarily on level walking, whereas walking on sloped surfaces, which is stated to affect knee kinematics and kinetics considerably, has been neglected to this day. This study aimed to analyze over-ground walking on level and sloped surfaces with a special focus on transverse and frontal plane knee kinematics and kinetics in patients with KA. A three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis was performed by means of optoelectronic stereophogrammetry 1.8 ± 0.4 years following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental arthroplasty surgery (UKA). AnyBody™ Modeling System was used to conduct inverse dynamics. The TKA group negotiated the decline walking task with reduced peak knee internal rotation angles compared with a healthy control group (CG). First-peak knee adduction moments were diminished by 27% (TKA group) and 22% (UKA group) compared with the CG during decline walking. No significant differences were detected between the TKA and UKA groups, regardless of the locomotion task. Decline walking exposed apparently more abnormal knee frontal and transverse plane adjustments in KA patients than level walking compared with the CG. Hence, walking on sloped surfaces should be included in further motion analysis studies investigating KA patients in order to detect potential deficits that might be not obvious during level walking.

Comparison of Alignment Correction Angles Between Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing UKA

Good outcomes have been reported with both fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, overcorrected alignment could induce the progression of arthritis on the non-arthroplasty side. Changes of limb alignment after UKA with both types of bearings (fixed bearing: 24 knees, mobile bearing: 28 knees) were investigated. The mean difference between the preoperative standing femoral-tibial angle (FTA) and postoperative standing FTA was significantly larger in mobile bearing UKA group. In fixed-bearing UKA, there must be some laxity in MCL tension so that a 2-mm tension gauge can be inserted. In mobile-bearing UKA, appropriate MCL tension is needed to prevent bearing dislocation. This difference in MCL tension may have caused the difference in the correction angle between the groups.

Patient Reported Kneeling Ability in Fixed and Mobile Bearing Knee Arthroplasty

Kneeling is an important function of the knee joint required for many daily activities. Bearing type is thought to influence functional outcome following UKA and TKA. Self-reported kneeling ability was recorded in 471 UKA and 206 TKA patients with fixed or mobile bearing implants. Kneeling ability was recorded from the Oxford Knee Score question 7. The self-reported ability to kneel was similar in patients with fixed and mobile bearing UKA implants following surgery. In TKA, greater proportions of patients were able to kneel in the fixed compared to the mobile bearing groups up to two years after surgery indicating that self-reported kneeling ability is enhanced in fixed compared to mobile bearing TKA.

Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Two design concepts are currently used for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) prostheses: fixed bearing (FB) and mobile bearing (MB). While MB prostheses have theoretical advantages over their FB counterparts, it is not clear whether they are associated with better outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to examine survivorship differences and differences in failure modes of between FB and MB designs.

METHODS

PubMed, Scirus and Cochrane library databases were searched for medial UKA outcome studies. A total of 44 papers, involving 9,463 knees, were eligible. Outcomes examined included knee function, survivorship and the reasons for, and incidence of, revision for FB and MB prostheses. Random effects meta-analysis was employed to obtain pooled revision rate estimates. Where available, cause-specific time to revision was extracted.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 8.7 years for FB and 5.9 years for MB prostheses. There were no other relevant baseline differences. The overall crude revision rate for FB and for MB prostheses was 0.90 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.21) and 1.51 (95 % CI 1.11-1.93) per 100 component years, respectively. After stratification on follow-up time and age, the revision rates were not substantially different, aside for younger patients in short term from studies with short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

No essential differences between the two designs were observed. MB and FB UKA designs have comparable revision rates. As our study is based on predominantly observational data, with large variations in reporting standards, inferences should be drawn with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee: a retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative results

Background

Excellent results have recently been reported for both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), but there have been few reports about which has a better long-term outcome. The preoperative and postoperative results of TKA and UKA for osteoarthritis of the knee were thus compared.

Methods

The results of 48 patients who underwent TKA and 25 patients who underwent UKA were evaluated based on clinical scores and survivorship in the middle long-term period. Preoperative, latest postoperative, and changes in the femoro-tibial angle (FTA), range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score), and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) were compared. The patients’ mean age was 73 years. The mean follow-up period was 9 years (TKA: mean, 10.5 years; range, 7–12 years; UKA: mean, 9 years; range, 6–11 years).

Results

Preoperative FTA and ROM were significantly higher in the UKA group than in the TKA group. Total changes in all scores were similar among the two groups, as were changes in scores for all JOA and JKOM domains. The cumulative revision rate was higher for UKA than for TKA (7 versus 4 %). Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 10 years was 84 % for UKA and 92 % for TKA.

Conclusions

This clinical study found no significant differences between TKA and UKA, except in long-term survivorship.

Outcome of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies between Fixed and Mobile Bearings Focusing on Complications

The purpose of this systematic review is to collate results of studies comparing fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), focusing on complications and timing for reoperations. Out of 723 results derived from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane database search engines on bearings in arthroplasty, 10 studies comparing clinical results of fixed bearings to mobile bearings in UKA were found eligible for analysis. The reoperation rate was calculated using a novel method such as reoperations per hundred component years, and the causes of specific reoperations were investigated. The overall reoperation rate per hundred component years was similar between the mobile bearings (1.392) and fixed bearings (1.377); however, mobile bearings were more susceptible to reoperations in cases with aseptic loosening (0.393>0.255), progression of arthritis (0.428>0.357) and implant dislocation (0.286>0). The overall incidence of complications is similar for fixed and mobile bearing designs in UKA. The discussion on complications presented above may assist surgeons in their choice of bearing design.